The sons of Shobal: Alvan, Manahath, Ebal, Shepho, and Onam. The sons of Zibeon: Aiah and Anah.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
bə·nê šō·w·ḇāl ‘al·yān ū·mā·na·ḥaṯ wə·‘ê·ḇāl šə·p̄î wə·ʾō·nå̄·ms ū·ḇə·nê ṣiḇ·‘ō·wn ’ay·yāh wa·‘ă·nāh
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
1 Chronicles 1:40 — . Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
The sons of Shobal: Alvan, Manahath, Ebal, Shepho, and Onam. The sons of Zibeon: Aiah and Anah.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
bə·nê šō·w·ḇāl ‘al·yān ū·mā·na·ḥaṯ wə·‘ê·ḇāl šə·p̄î wə·ʾō·nå̄·ms ū·ḇə·nê ṣiḇ·‘ō·wn ’ay·yāh wa·‘ă·nāh
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
⚙ Nothing in this verse advances Israel. Shobal and Zibeon are, on K&D's reading of the wider list, Seirite and not Esauite: the older population of the mountain, whom “Esau with his descendants… subdued by degrees” until the two stocks “became fused with them into one people.” Gill makes the same separation at the head of the section, observing that Seir's family “were not of the race of Esau, but are mentioned because they were a family into which Esau, and a son of his, married, and whose possessions he and his obtained.” So the chain of בְּנֵי (bên, H1121) running through this verse is a chain of aborigines, kept on the Chronicler's page by marriage and by conquest. A post-exilic writer assembling a register for a returned remnant had every motive to begin at Abraham and stop there. Henry notices where the book is actually heading, saying the genealogy “is from hence confined to the posterity of Abraham.” It is precisely because that narrowing is about to happen that these dispossessed names are worth counting: they are the width the narrowing leaves behind.
⚙ Two of this verse's names are spelled against their source. The Hebrew reads עַלְיָ֧ן (ʻal·yān, H5935) where Genesis 36:23 reads Alvan, and שְׁפִ֣י (šə·p̄î, H8195) where Genesis reads Shepho; Strong's lexicon simply prints both forms of each. Gill states the relation plainly: the account here “is the same with Genesis 36:20, with some little variation of names.” Cambridge, for its part, writes nothing on this verse except “See Genesis 36:24.” Barnes, working a few names earlier on the same page, offers the principle that covers a good deal of such divergence, that “the writer has in his mind rather the tribes descended from Eliphaz than his actual children.” The significant thing is what nobody did: no scribe silently conformed the Chronicler to Genesis, and no translator's footnote is needed to see the seam. The rarest word in the verse, ʻAlvân, occurs in exactly two verses in the Hebrew Bible, this one and its Genesis parent, which is why the dependence is demonstrable rather than merely likely. A list that has been copied and not smoothed is a list you can check, and that is worth more than a clean one.
⚙ Offered to be tested, not believed on our word. The doctrinal weight of a verse like this is not in what it says but in the fact that it was kept. Eleven words, ten of them names, seven of those names belonging to a people outside the covenant and to a mountain God gave away from Israel. The Chronicler is writing to a small, shaken community that wants to know who it is, and before he tells them, he spends his ink on Alyan, Manahath, Ebal, Shephi, Onam, Aiah and Anah. Scripture does not treat election as a reason to stop counting the unelected. It counts them, spells them badly, and keeps them anyway, and it drops only the one name it drops, Aholibamah, whose absence K&D records rather than explains. If the Bible were a book about the important, this verse would not exist. It exists because the God who chose Abraham did not therefore forget Seir, and because a text willing to preserve names nobody needs is a text that has not been curated to flatter its readers. We hold this reading loosely: the Chronicler states no motive, and the argument runs from what he preserved, not from what he claimed.
Election never became a reason to stop counting. (⚙ a fallible line of ours, not Scripture.)
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
This verse is not parallel to Genesis 36:23-24; it is taken from it. The Verifier finds עַלְוָן (ʻAlvân, H5935) shared with Genesis 36:23 and occurring in only two verses in the entire Hebrew Bible, alongside Shôwbâl (H7732) and ʻÊybâl (H5858); and it finds the second half of our verse matched at Genesis 36:24 by ʼAyâh (H345), Tsibʻôwn (H6649) and ʻĂnâh (H6034) together. Gill says the same from the commentator's side: the account “is the same with Genesis 36:20, with some little variation of names.” Cambridge's only note on the verse is “See Genesis 36:24.” The Genesis text adds what the Chronicler omits, that this Anah is the one who found the hot springs in the wilderness while pasturing his father Zibeon's donkeys; the copy keeps the names and lets the story go.
Genesis 36:23 · Genesis 36:24 · Genesis 36:20
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H5935 ʻAlvân (in 2 vv, the rarest possible witness, this verse and Genesis 36:23) plus H7732 Shôwbâl (in 9 vv) and H5858 ʻÊybâl (in 8 vv); with Genesis 36:24, the triple H345 ʼAyâh (in 6 vv) + H6649 Tsibʻôwn (in 7 vv) + H6034 ʻĂnâh (in 10 vv) co-occurring in the same clause order. Hebrew to Hebrew, so a verbal tier is available, and the two-verse lexeme carries it.
Our verse is the expansion of a heading two verses earlier. 1 Chronicles 1:38 lists the sons of Seir, and v. 40 opens the households of two of them. The Verifier records Shôwbâl (H7732), Tsibʻôwn (H6649) and ʻĂnâh (H6034) shared between the two verses, which is repetition of a roster rather than quotation of a source. K&D reads the arrangement as deliberate: the chapter notices “the tribal princes of the Seirite inhabitants of the land” in v. 38, and then in vv. 39-42 “their sons (eighteen men and one woman, Timna).” The shape is head, then house, head, then house, the Chronicler's standard joinery.
1 Chronicles 1:38 · Genesis 36:29 · Genesis 36:20
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H7732 Shôwbâl (in 9 vv), H6649 Tsibʻôwn (in 7 vv), H6034 ʻĂnâh (in 10 vv) across 1 Chronicles 1:38, Genesis 36:20 and Genesis 36:29. Real shared vocabulary, but it is a roster repeated inside one register, not one text citing another; no rare lexeme, so no verbal claim.
Two of the Edomite names in this verse reappear later in the Chronicler's own book on the Israelite side of the line. ʼÔwnâm (H208) stands here as a son of Shobal the Seirite and again at 1 Chronicles 2:26 and 2:28 in the house of Jerahmeel son of Judah. Mânachath (H4506) is an Edomite here, but Strong's already glosses it as “an Edomite and… a place in Moab,” and the Verifier finds it at 1 Chronicles 2:52 and 2:54 in Caleb's territory and at 1 Chronicles 8:6 in Benjamin's. We claim only what the lexemes show: the same words, not the same men. Whether the recurrence reflects migration, shared naming custom, or land taken over, the text does not say, and we will not supply a reason it withholds.
1 Chronicles 2:26 · 1 Chronicles 2:28 · 1 Chronicles 2:52 · 1 Chronicles 8:6
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H208 ʼÔwnâm (in 4 vv) and H4506 Mânachath (in 5 vv). Genuine lexeme identity, but the link is recurrence of a name across different persons and places, explicitly not a quotation; tiered structural for that reason despite the low frequencies.
The name that closes this verse's first pair, אַיָּה (ʼAyâh, H345), is borne elsewhere only by the father of Rizpah, Saul's concubine, whose long vigil over her executed sons at 2 Samuel 21:10-11 is one of the most desolate scenes in the Old Testament. Strong's gloss, tellingly, defines H345 as “the name of two Israelites” and does not mention this Edomite at all. That gap is the point worth recording: the lexicon summarizes the famous usage and our verse falls outside the summary. We draw no thematic bridge between an Edomite chief's son and Rizpah's father. There is a shared word, six verses wide, and nothing more, and pretending otherwise would be the kind of link this project exists to refuse.
2 Samuel 3:7 · 2 Samuel 21:8 · 2 Samuel 21:10 · 2 Samuel 21:11
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H345 ʼAyâh (in 6 vv). The lexeme is confirmed; the connection is homonymy between distinct persons, and the note above states that limit explicitly rather than building a motif on it.
Edom is the nation Scripture keeps and does not choose, and Paul makes that pairing the test case of election, setting Jacob and Esau side by side before either had done anything. The Chronicler's habit is the same in narrative form: he writes Esau's house and Seir's house out in full, then turns and follows only Abraham's chosen line. Henry sees the turn, noting that from here the genealogy “is from hence confined to the posterity of Abraham.” The connection is a pattern, not a citation: no shared lexeme is possible, since the link runs Hebrew to Greek, and Paul is reasoning from Genesis and Malachi rather than from Chronicles. We tier it structural on that basis and claim no more.
Romans 9:10-13 · Malachi 1:2-3
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's numbers are impossible and no verbal tier is available. The recorded basis is the shared structure of the registers themselves: Chronicles writes Esau's and Seir's lines out fully and then narrows to Abraham's, which is the pattern Paul argues from. Paul cites Genesis and Malachi, not this verse.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ The register in which this verse sits is under a strong current. Henry marks it at exactly this point: from here the genealogy “is from hence confined to the posterity of Abraham.” Chapter 1 has run from Adam through the nations, through Ishmael, through Keturah's sons, through Esau's dukes and Seir's chiefs, and every branch it names is a branch it is about to leave; the width exists so that the narrowing can be seen. The channel runs on to Judah, to Jesse, to David, and the New Testament opens by picking up that same thread at its end, “the book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham,” while Luke runs it backward past Abraham to Adam, which is where 1 Chronicles 1 began. That Christ is the terminus of this genealogical motion is the apostolic reading itself, held from the Evangelists onward; what we add is only the observation that a verse about seven Edomite chiefs is part of the same instrument, one of the branches whose pruning gives the line its direction.
Matthew 1:1-2 · Luke 3:34-38 · Genesis 12:3
⚙ Alyan, Manahath, Ebal, Shephi, Onam, Aiah, Anah. Seven men of a people Israel dispossessed, whose only appearance in the canon is a list, and even here their names are spelled two ways. Henry, reading these chapters, says the thing a modern reader is trying not to say: “Short is our passage through time into eternity. May we be distinguished as the Lord's people.” We would press it one step further and mark the step as ours. The Gospel's promise is not that the important are remembered but that the obscure are, and the last book of the canon shows a multitude no one could number, drawn out of every tribe and tongue and people and nation, with the Lord telling his disciples to rejoice that their names are written in heaven rather than at any power they wield. That these Seirite names function as a figure of such keeping is a reading of ours, not the Chronicler's claim and not one we found asserted in any voice on this verse. Henry supplies the devotional instinct; the typology is ours and is offered as novel.
Luke 10:20 · Revelation 7:9 · Isaiah 56:5
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text. The Hebrew here diverges from BSB's English in two places and we have followed the Hebrew in the literal line: עַלְיָ֧ן is Alyan where BSB prints “Alvan,” and שְׁפִ֣י is Shephi where BSB prints “Shepho.” Both English forms are the Genesis 36:23 spellings, and Strong's records both variants under H5935 and H8195, so the difference is a real feature of the transmission, not an error in either text. The final samek in וְאוֹנָ֑םס is the Masoretic closed-section marker carried into the transcription, not part of the name Onam.
Sources. Poole has no note on this verse. The Geneva entry supplied to us contains only the verse text and a section heading, so it is not quoted as a voice. Barnes' note on this page concerns Timna at 1 Chronicles 1:39 rather than v. 40, and is cited in the second movement as a general principle only, with that limit stated. Cambridge's entire note is the cross reference “See Genesis 36:24,” quoted whole. K&D's entry is capped in our brief; the sentences used here fall well inside the supplied text, but readers should know his full argument against Bertheau's count of seventy tribes continues past our excerpt.
Uncertain. Who these Seirite chiefs were, and in what relation they stood to Esau's house, rests on K&D's reconstruction from Genesis 36:20-30, not on any statement in this verse. Whether the Ebal of v. 40 has any connection to Mount Ebal is unknown to us; the lexicon gives them one Strong's number and one geographical gloss, and asserts no relation. The recurrence of Onam and Manahath in Judah's and Caleb's lines is a fact about lexemes, and we have deliberately not converted it into a claim about persons or migrations. The christological readings are marked separately: the genealogical narrowing toward David and Christ is the widely-held apostolic reading, while the figure of unremembered names being written down is our own and is labeled novel.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)