The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

1 Chronicles16:37–43

Worship before the Ark

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

1 Chronicles 16:37–43 — Worship before the Ark. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

37

So David left Asaph and his associates there before the ark of the covenant of the LORD, to minister there regularly according to the daily requirements,

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

way·ya·‘ă·zāḇ- lə·’ā·sāp̄ ū·lə·’e·ḥāw šām lip̄·nê ’ă·rō·wn bə·rîṯ- Yah·weh lə·šā·rêṯ lip̄·nê hā·’ā·rō·wn tā·mîḏ yō·wm bə·yō·w·mōw liḏ·ḇar-

Word by word15 · parsed
וַיַּֽעֲזָב־way·ya·‘ă·zāḇ-So David leftH5800
√ ʻâzab — to loosen, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
ʻâzab: to loosen, to leave, to forsake The consecutive imperfect drives the narrative forward from the psalm of vv. 8 to 36. Ellicott judges the unnamed subject odd enough to be evidence of a source seam: he says that if the chronicler had composed the ode himself, “he might better have written, ‘And David left.’” The verse is thus both a liturgical appointment and, on Ellicott's reading, a visible join in the book.
לְאָסָ֖ףlə·’ā·sāp̄AsaphH623
√ ʼÂçâph — Asaph, the name of three Israelites, and of the family of the firstPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
וּלְאֶחָ֑יוū·lə·’e·ḥāwand his associatesH251
√ ʼâch — a brother (used in the widest sense of literal relationship and metaphorical affinity or resemblance (like father))Conjunctive waw, Preposition-lNounmasculine plural constructthird person masculine singular
שָׁ֗םšāmthereH8033
√ shâm — there (transferring to time) thenAdverb
לִפְנֵי֙lip̄·nêbeforeH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNouncommon plural construct
אֲר֣וֹן’ă·rō·wnthe arkH727
√ ʼârôwn — a boxNouncommon singular construct
ʼârôwn: a box, a chest The bare noun is domestic furniture. Everything sacred about it comes from the genitive that follows, not from the object itself, which is exactly why Israel's disasters with this box (1 Samuel 4 to 6, and 1 Chronicles 13) turned on treating the container as power in itself.
בְּרִית־bə·rîṯ-of the covenantH1285
√ bᵉrîyth — a compact (because made by passing between pieces of flesh)Nounfeminine singular
bᵉrîyth: a compact, cut by passing between pieces The construct chain ark of the covenant of YHWH stacks three nouns so that the box is defined by the pact and the pact by the Name. The singers minister before a treaty document, not before an image; there is nothing in the tent to look at, which is why the service there can only be voice.
יְהוָ֔הYah·wehof the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
לְשָׁרֵ֞תlə·šā·rêṯto ministerH8334
√ shârath — to attend as a menial or worshipperPreposition-lVerbPielInfinitive construct
shârath: to attend as a menial or worshipper Piel infinitive of purpose. Gill fixes the content of the ministry precisely: “in singing the praises of God.” Henry and Benson both press the consequence, that at this tent there was neither altar nor incense, so that praise itself had to carry what elsewhere was carried by smoke.
לִפְנֵ֧יlip̄·nê[there]H6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNouncommon plural construct
הָאָר֛וֹןhā·’ā·rō·wn. . .H727
√ ʼârôwn — a boxArticleNouncommon singular
תָּמִ֖ידtā·mîḏregularlyH8548
√ tâmîyd — properly, continuance (as indefinite extension)Adverb
tâmîyd: continuance, perpetuity This adverb is the unit's spine. It governs song at Zion in v. 37 and burnt offering at Gibeon in v. 40, binding two sanctuaries into one unbroken day. Where the Law had attached tāmîḏ to the lamb (Exodus 29:38), David attaches it also to the choir, and the chronicler records the innovation without apology.
י֥וֹםyō·wmaccording to the dailyH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)Nounmasculine singular
בְּיוֹמֽוֹ׃bə·yō·w·mōw. . .H3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)Preposition-bNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
לִדְבַר־liḏ·ḇar-requirementsH1697
√ dâbâr — a wordPreposition-lNounmasculine singular construct
dâbâr: a word, a matter, a thing required In construct with yôwm it means the day's due business. The idiom is administrative before it is devotional, and that is the point: worship here is placed on a roster.
38

along with Obed-edom and his sixty-eight relatives. Obed-edom son of Jeduthun, and also Hosah, were to be gatekeepers.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·‘ō·ḇêḏ ’ĕ·ḏōm šiš·šîm ū·šə·mō·w·nāh wə·‘ō·ḇêḏ wa·’ă·ḥê·hem ’ĕ·ḏōm ben- yə·ḏî·ṯūn wə·ḥō·sāh lə·šō·‘ă·rîm

Word by word11 · parsed
וְעֹבֵ֥דwə·‘ō·ḇêḏvvvH5654
√ ʻÔbêd ʼĔdôwm — Obed-Edom, the name of five Israelites
אֱדֹ֛ם’ĕ·ḏōmalong with Obed-edomH5654
√ ʻÔbêd ʼĔdôwm — Obed-Edom, the name of five IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
שִׁשִּׁ֣יםšiš·šîmand his sixty-eightH8346
√ shishshîym — sixtyNumbercommon plural
shishshîym: sixty A roster number, not a symbol. Its interest is forensic: Pulpit sets the sixty-eight here beside the sixty-two of 1 Chronicles 26:8 and suggests sons of Hosah make up the difference, then withdraws the suggestion as unwarranted guessing.
וּשְׁמוֹנָ֑הū·šə·mō·w·nāh. . .H8083
√ shᵉmôneh — a cardinal number, eight (as if a surplus above the 'perfect' seven)Conjunctive wawNumbermasculine singular
וְעֹבֵ֨דwə·‘ō·ḇêḏH5654
√ ʻÔbêd ʼĔdôwm — Obed-Edom, the name of five Israelites
וַאֲחֵיהֶ֖םwa·’ă·ḥê·hemrelativesH251
√ ʼâch — a brother (used in the widest sense of literal relationship and metaphorical affinity or resemblance (like father))Conjunctive wawNounmasculine plural constructthird person masculine plural
ʼâch: a brother, in the widest sense Throughout this unit ʼâch is a guild word rather than a blood word: Asaph's brothers, Zadok's brother priests, Obed-Edom's brothers. Levitical service is organised as extended household, which is why the plural suffix without a plural antecedent is such a visible scar in the text.
אֱדֹ֧ם’ĕ·ḏōmObed-edomH5654
√ ʻÔbêd ʼĔdôwm — Obed-Edom, the name of five IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
בֶּן־ben-sonH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine singular construct
bên: a son, a builder of the family name The patronymic is the crux. K&D distinguishes this Jeduthun, a Korahite and father of a doorkeeper, from the Merarite chief musician Jeduthun, and then refuses to settle whether the two Obed-Edoms of this verse are one man, “because the text of our verse is defective.”
יְדִית֛וּןyə·ḏî·ṯūnof JeduthunH3038
√ Yᵉdûwthûwn — Jeduthun, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
וְחֹסָ֖הwə·ḥō·sāhand also HosahH2621
√ Chôçâh — Chosah, an IsraeliteConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
לְשֹׁעֲרִֽים׃lə·šō·‘ă·rîmwere to be gatekeepersH7778
√ shôwʻêr — a janitorPreposition-lNounmasculine plural
shôwʻêr: a janitor, a gatekeeper The office is not decorative. Gatekeepers decide what crosses a threshold, and after the death of Uzzah (1 Chronicles 13:10) the question of who may approach the ark is not abstract. The same root returns at v. 42 in the singular shaʻar, the gate itself, closing the unit's inner frame.
39

And David left Zadok the priest and his fellow priests before the tabernacle of the LORD at the high place in Gibeon

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·’êṯ ṣā·ḏō·wq hak·kō·hên wə·’e·ḥāw hak·kō·hă·nîm lip̄·nê miš·kan Yah·weh bab·bā·māh ’ă·šer bə·ḡiḇ·‘ō·wn

Word by word11 · parsed
וְאֵ֣ת׀wə·’êṯAndH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
ʼêth: the object marker A function word with real force here: it signals that the sentence began two verses ago and that Zadok, like Asaph, is something David left. K&D notes the construction is still dependent on the verb of v. 37.
צָד֣וֹקṣā·ḏō·wqDavid left ZadokH6659
√ Tsâdôwq — Tsadok, the name of eight or nine IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
Tsâdôwq: Zadok Pulpit traces him to the line of Eleazar. His posting at Gibeon rather than at the ark is the seed of the later Zadokite settlement of the priesthood, and Cambridge suggests Abiathar was left in charge of the ark, so the two rival priestly houses are already standing in two different sanctuaries.
הַכֹּהֵ֗ןhak·kō·hênthe priestH3548
√ kôhên — literally one officiating, a priestArticleNounmasculine singular
וְאֶחָיו֙wə·’e·ḥāwand his fellowH251
√ ʼâch — a brother (used in the widest sense of literal relationship and metaphorical affinity or resemblance (like father))Conjunctive wawNounmasculine plural constructthird person masculine singular
הַכֹּ֣הֲנִ֔יםhak·kō·hă·nîmpriestsH3548
√ kôhên — literally one officiating, a priestArticleNounmasculine plural
לִפְנֵ֖יlip̄·nêbeforeH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNouncommon plural construct
מִשְׁכַּ֣ןmiš·kanthe tabernacleH4908
√ mishkân — a residence (including a shepherd's hut, the lair of animals, figuratively, the graveNounmasculine singular construct
mishkân: a residence, a dwelling place The word names the Mosaic structure of Exodus 25 to 40. Its survival at Gibeon with its bronze altar is the whole reason this unit has to divide the staff: the ark and the dwelling, joined in the wilderness, are now some miles apart, and David funds both.
יְהוָ֑הYah·wehof the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
בַּבָּמָ֖הbab·bā·māhat the high placeH1116
√ bâmâh — an elevationPreposition-b, ArticleNounfeminine singular
bâmâh: an elevation, a high place Barnes calls Gibeon “the great high place” of 1 Kings 3:4 and dates a second national centre from here, lasting until Solomon's temple. That the chronicler records the arrangement without censure, while Kings later condemns high places generally, is one of the honest strains in the Old Testament's own account of worship.
אֲשֶׁ֥ר’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
בְּגִבְעֽוֹן׃bə·ḡiḇ·‘ō·wnin GibeonH1391
√ Gibʻôwn — Gibon, a place in PalestinePreposition-bNounproperfeminine singular
40

to regularly present burnt offerings to the LORD on the altar of burnt offerings, morning and evening, according to all that was written in the Law of the LORD, which He had commanded Israel to keep.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

tā·mîḏ lə·ha·‘ă·lō·wṯ ‘ō·lō·wṯ Yah·weh ‘al- miz·baḥ hā·‘ō·lāh lab·bō·qer wə·lā·‘ā·reḇ ū·lə·ḵāl- hak·kā·ṯūḇ bə·ṯō·w·raṯ Yah·weh ’ă·šer ṣiw·wāh ‘al- yiś·rā·’êl

Word by word17 · parsed
תָּמִ֖ידtā·mîḏto regularlyH8548
√ tâmîyd — properly, continuance (as indefinite extension)Adverb
לְֽהַעֲלוֹת֩lə·ha·‘ă·lō·wṯpresentH5927
√ ʻâlâh — to ascend, intransitively (be high) or actively (mount)Preposition-lVerbHifilInfinitive construct
ʻâlâh: to ascend, to cause to mount The Hifil makes the priest the agent of an ascent he does not himself make. This is why the burnt offering, alone among the sacrifices, is wholly consumed: nothing comes back down. The verb quietly answers the unit's spatial problem, a God who dwells at Gibeon and an ark on Zion, by pointing everything upward.
עֹל֨וֹת‘ō·lō·wṯburnt offeringsH5930
√ ʻôlâh — a step or (collectively, stairs, as ascending)Nounfeminine plural
ʻôlâh: that which goes up, a burnt offering Ellicott identifies the precise rite: the Tamid, a lamb at dawn and at sunset with its grain and drink offering, prescribed at Exodus 29:38 and Numbers 28:3. JFB adds the same two references. The chronicler is not describing David's invention here but David's maintenance of what was already commanded.
לַיהוָ֜הYah·wehto the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
עַל־‘al-onH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
מִזְבַּ֧חmiz·baḥthe altarH4196
√ mizbêach — an altarNounmasculine singular construct
הָעֹלָ֛הhā·‘ō·lāhof burnt offeringsH5930
√ ʻôlâh — a step or (collectively, stairs, as ascending)ArticleNounfeminine singular
לַבֹּ֣קֶרlab·bō·qermorningH1242
√ bôqer — properly, dawn (as the break of day)Preposition-l, ArticleNounmasculine singular
וְלָעָ֑רֶבwə·lā·‘ā·reḇand eveningH6153
√ ʻereb — duskConjunctive waw, Preposition-l, ArticleNounmasculine singular
וּלְכָל־ū·lə·ḵāl-according to allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeConjunctive waw, Preposition-lNounmasculine singular construct
הַכָּתוּב֙hak·kā·ṯūḇthat was writtenH3789
√ kâthab — to grave, by implication, to write (describe, inscribe, prescribe, subscribe)ArticleVerbQalQalPassParticiplemasculine singular
kâthab: to grave, to inscribe, to write The passive participle is the unit's standard of legitimacy. David may appoint singers at a tent that has no altar, but at Gibeon the measure is a text, and Barnes draws the resulting distinction sharply: the sacrifices commanded by the Law were offered at Gibeon, while at Jerusalem were offered voluntary additional sacrifices.
בְּתוֹרַ֣תbə·ṯō·w·raṯin the LawH8451
√ tôwrâh — a precept or statute, especially the Decalogue or PentateuchPreposition-bNounfeminine singular construct
tôwrâh: instruction, precept, the Pentateuch The construct tôrat YHWH makes the instruction God's own possession, not Moses' invention. Henry's judgment on the arrangement is that ceremonial worship, “being of Divine institution, must by no means be omitted,” even where David has just demonstrated that praise can stand where an altar cannot.
יְהוָ֔הYah·wehof the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
אֲשֶׁ֥ר’ă·šerwhichH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
צִוָּ֖הṣiw·wāhHe had commandedH6680
√ tsâvâh — (intensively) to constitute, enjoinVerbPielPerfectthird person masculine singular
tsâvâh: to constitute, to enjoin, to command Piel perfect, third masculine singular, with YHWH as subject across the relative clause. The perfect tense matters: the commanding is finished and standing, and the priests at Gibeon are not legislating but obeying an already closed word.
עַל־‘al-. . .H5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃yiś·rā·’êlIsrael to keepH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
41

With them were Heman, Jeduthun, and the rest of those chosen and designated by name to give thanks to the LORD, for “His loving devotion endures forever.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·‘im·mā·hem hê·mān wî·ḏū·ṯūn ū·šə·’ār hab·bə·rū·rîm ’ă·šer niq·qə·ḇū bə·šê·mō·wṯ lə·hō·ḏō·wṯ Yah·weh kî ḥas·dōw lə·‘ō·w·lām

Word by word13 · parsed
וְעִמָּהֶם֙wə·‘im·mā·hemWith themH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iConjunctive wawPrepositionthird person masculine plural
הֵימָ֣ןhê·mānwere HemanH1968
√ Hêymân — Heman, the name of at least two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וִֽידוּת֔וּןwî·ḏū·ṯūnJeduthunH3038
√ Yᵉdûwthûwn — Jeduthun, an IsraeliteConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וּשְׁאָר֙ū·šə·’ārand the restH7605
√ shᵉʼâr — a remainderConjunctive wawNounmasculine singular construct
הַבְּרוּרִ֔יםhab·bə·rū·rîmof those chosenH1305
√ bârar — to clarify (iArticleVerbQalQalPassParticiplemasculine plural
bârar: to clarify, to purge, to sift The same root is used of polishing arrows and of purifying a people. As a Qal passive participle with the article it names a class: the sifted ones. Barnes identifies them concretely as the men listed at 1 Chronicles 15:17 to 24, split between the two sanctuaries.
אֲשֶׁ֥ר’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
נִקְּב֖וּniq·qə·ḇūand designatedH5344
√ nâqab — to puncture, literally (to perforate, with more or less violence) or figuratively (to specify, designate, libel)VerbNifalPerfectthird person common plural
nâqab: to puncture, to designate, to specify Niphal perfect, third common plural: they were designated, by someone unnamed. The passive keeps David out of the sentence at the very point where the appointing is most personal, and the same idiom returns at 1 Chronicles 12:31, which K&D cross-references here.
בְּשֵׁמ֑וֹתbə·šê·mō·wṯby nameH8034
√ shêm — an appellation, as amark or memorial of individualityPreposition-bNounmasculine plural
לְהֹדוֹת֙lə·hō·ḏō·wṯto give thanksH3034
√ yâdâh — physically, to throw (a stone, an arrow) at or awayPreposition-lVerbHifilInfinitive construct
yâdâh: to throw, and so to confess, to give thanks The Hifil is the liturgical stem. Ellicott hears behind this clause the refrain of psalms like Psalm 136, and notes that the chronicler is repeating his own liturgical formula from 1 Chronicles 16:34 a few verses earlier. Gibeon, with its altar, is given the same words that Zion, with its ark, has just sung.
לַֽיהוָ֔הYah·wehto the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
כִּ֥יforH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
חַסְדּֽוֹ׃ḥas·dōwHis loving devotionH2617
√ chêçêd — kindnessNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
chêçêd: kindness, covenant loyalty The construct with the third masculine singular suffix, his chesed, makes the attribute inalienably God's. Gill glosses the point of the refrain as praise for benefits “flowing from his grace and mercy continually,” which ties the word back to the tāmîḏ of vv. 37 and 40.
לְעוֹלָ֖םlə·‘ō·w·lāmendures foreverH5769
√ ʻôwlâm — properly, concealed, iPreposition-lNounmasculine singular
ʻôwlâm: concealed time, the vanishing point, forever Strong's root sense is concealed, that is, time out of sight in either direction. With the preposition lᵉ it means toward the horizon. The singers are given a text about duration and are told to sing it tāmîḏ: the content and the schedule say the same thing.
42

Heman and Jeduthun had with them trumpets and cymbals for the music and instruments for the songs of God. And the sons of Jeduthun were stationed at the gate.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

hê·mān wî·ḏū·ṯūn wə·‘im·mā·hem ḥă·ṣō·ṣə·rō·wṯ ū·mə·ṣil·ta·yim lə·maš·mî·‘îm ū·ḵə·lê šîr hā·’ĕ·lō·hîm ū·ḇə·nê yə·ḏū·ṯūn laš·šā·‘ar

Word by word12 · parsed
הֵימָ֨ןhê·mānHemanH1968
√ Hêymân — Heman, the name of at least two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וִֽידוּת֜וּןwî·ḏū·ṯūnand JeduthunH3038
√ Yᵉdûwthûwn — Jeduthun, an IsraeliteConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וְעִמָּהֶם֩wə·‘im·mā·hemhad with themH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iConjunctive wawPrepositionthird person masculine plural
חֲצֹצְר֤וֹתḥă·ṣō·ṣə·rō·wṯtrumpetsH2689
√ chătsôtsᵉrâh — a trumpet (from its sundered or quavering note)Nounfeminine plural
chătsôtsᵉrâh: a trumpet, named from its quavering note The straight metal trumpets of Numbers 10 were blown by priests, not Levites, which is part of K&D's argument that Heman and Jeduthun cannot be the subject of this list of instruments. The word itself is onomatopoeic in Strong's account, named for the broken sound it makes.
וּמְצִלְתַּ֙יִם֙ū·mə·ṣil·ta·yimand cymbalsH4700
√ mᵉtsêleth — (only dual) double tinklers, iConjunctive wawNounfd
לְמַשְׁמִיעִ֔יםlə·maš·mî·‘îmfor the musicH8085
√ shâmaʻ — to hear intelligently (often with implication of attention, obedience, etcPreposition-lVerbHifilParticiplemasculine plural
shâmaʻ: to hear with attention and obedience (Hifil: to cause to hear) The participle turns the loudest objects in the sanctuary into servants of hearing. K&D argues from 1 Chronicles 16:5, where the same Hifil is predicated of Asaph, that the cymbals are “for those who gave forth the notes or the melody.” In a religion with no image, the instrument exists to make a word carry.
וּכְלֵ֖יū·ḵə·lêand instrumentsH3627
√ kᵉlîy — something prepared, iConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural construct
שִׁ֣ירšîr[for] the songsH7892
√ shîyr — a songNounmasculine singular construct
shîyr: a song Paired with kᵉlîy, “something prepared,” it yields the phrase for a dedicated instrument. Benson draws the sharp line here: these were appropriated to the worship of God, “not such as they used on other occasions,” since “between common mirth and holy joy, there is a vast difference.”
הָאֱלֹהִ֑יםhā·’ĕ·lō·hîmof GodH430
√ ʼĕlôhîym — gods in the ordinary senseArticleNounmasculine plural
וּבְנֵ֥יū·ḇə·nêAnd the sonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural construct
יְדוּת֖וּןyə·ḏū·ṯūnof JeduthunH3038
√ Yᵉdûwthûwn — Jeduthun, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
לַשָּֽׁעַר׃laš·šā·‘arwere stationed at the gateH8179
√ shaʻar — an opening, iPreposition-l, ArticleNounmasculine singular
shaʻar: an opening, a gate The unit ends its inner frame where it began, at a threshold: gatekeepers at the ark in v. 38, sons of Jeduthun at the gate in v. 42. K&D reasons that since Obed-Edom the doorkeeper is also called a son of Jeduthun, these must be his brothers, a family numerous enough to keep both doors, at Zion and at Gibeon.
43

Then all the people departed for their homes, and David returned home to bless his household.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ḵāl hā·‘ām ’îš way·yê·lə·ḵū lə·ḇê·ṯōw dā·wîḏ way·yis·sōḇ lə·ḇā·rêḵ ’eṯ- bê·ṯōw

Word by word10 · parsed
כָל־ḵālThen allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
הָעָ֖םhā·‘āmthe peopleH5971
√ ʻam — a people (as a congregated unit)ArticleNounmasculine singular
אִ֣ישׁ’îš. . .H376
√ ʼîysh — a man as an individual or a male personNounmasculine singular
ʼîysh: a man as an individual The distributive singular inside a plural subject is a Hebrew idiom for dispersal: the assembled nation becomes households again. It is the counter-motion to the whole chapter, which gathered them; and the chronicler ends on the dispersal rather than on the choir.
וַיֵּלְכ֥וּway·yê·lə·ḵūdepartedH1980
√ hâlak — to walk (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
לְבֵית֑וֹlə·ḇê·ṯōwfor their homesH1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcPreposition-lNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
דָּוִ֖ידdā·wîḏand DavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
וַיִּסֹּ֥בway·yis·sōḇreturned homeH5437
√ çâbab — to revolve, surround, or borderConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
çâbab: to revolve, to surround, to go round Ellicott's reading, that Chronicles says David went round where Samuel says he returned, is a small difference with a real effect: the king makes a circuit that ends at his own door. The verse thus closes a chapter of processions with one more, the shortest, from the tent to the household.
לְבָרֵ֥ךְlə·ḇā·rêḵto blessH1288
√ bârak — to kneelPreposition-lVerbPielInfinitive construct
bârak: to kneel, and so to bless Piel infinitive of purpose. David's last recorded act in this chapter is priestly in form though he is not a priest: he blesses, as he blessed the people in v. 2. Geneva presses the domestic duty, that after our duty to God we are chiefly bound to our own house. Ellicott notes that the chronicler here omits the scene with Michal which follows in 2 Samuel 6:20 to 23, keeping his history to the sacred institutions; the omission makes this blessing the unclouded last word.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
בֵּיתֽוֹ׃פbê·ṯōwhis householdH1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
bayith: a house, a family, a dynasty The word that closes the unit will carry the weight of the next major movement, since in 1 Chronicles 17 David proposes to build a bayith for the ark and is told instead that YHWH will build him a bayith. Here it is still only a household being blessed, but the pun is loaded and about to go off.

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. A tent with no altar: song set on the daily roster — vv. 37 to 38

The great ode ends and the administration begins. Ellicott reads v. 37 as the resumption of a narrative suspended at 1 Chronicles 16:7, and notices that the Hebrew names no subject for וַיַּֽעֲזָב־, so that the English must supply David. What David leaves at Zion is a choir and nothing else. Henry states the consequence without flinching: “No sacrifices were offered there, nor incense burnt, because the altars were not there.” Benson says the same in nearly the same words, and both draw the same conclusion, that David's prayer stood in for incense and his lifted hands for the evening sacrifice. Gill fixes the content of the ministry as “singing the praises of God,” and dates the hours by Jarchi and Kimchi to the times of the morning and evening sacrifice, which is to say that a tent with no altar kept an altar's clock. The governing word is תָּמִ֖יד (tāmîḏ, H8548), continuance, the technical term Ellicott will name at v. 40 as the Tamid. Pulpit calls this arrangement “an important step in advance in the crystallizing of the world's ecclesiastical institutions,” a permanent local ministry with fixity of place and regularity of time. ⚙ Our own observation is smaller and textual: the verse that founds a perpetual choir is built on a verb, ʻâzab, whose plain root is to loosen, to forsake. Verse 38 then breaks. K&D says flatly, “In these words there is a textual error,” pointing to the plural suffix on וַאֲחֵיהֶ֖ם with only one name before it; Ellicott proposes supplying Hosah; Cambridge reports that the LXX simply reads “and his brethren.” Pulpit surveys the same ground, weighs the sixty-eight here against the sixty-two of 1 Chronicles 26:8, and concludes that “conjecture, however, has not sufficient clue here to warrant it.” The first thing this unit does, after a chapter of unbroken praise, is show us a page with a hole in it.

ii. A dwelling with no ark: sacrifice measured by what is written — vv. 39 to 40

Verse 39 has no verb at all. Both Ellicott and K&D observe that the accusative marker וְאֵ֣ת׀ keeps Zadok hanging on the he left of v. 37, so that the two sanctuaries are grammatically one sentence. Ellicott frames the historical point: the ark's new home “was the inauguration of a new national sanctuary. But the old one at Gibeon was not therefore abandoned.” Barnes dates Gibeon's importance from this moment, calling it thereafter “the great high place” of 1 Kings 3:4 and a second centre of national worship divided with Jerusalem for above fifty years. Cambridge will not let the arrangement pass without naming its difficulty: “The Deuteronomic law that there should be one sanctuary only was not yet recognised even by kings of a religious reputation.” The commentators also disagree about Zadok himself. Ellicott takes the article on הַכֹּהֵ֗ן as par excellence, the High Priest; Benson and Poole both deny it, making Zadok “the second,” with Abiathar stationed at the ark; K&D supports that division, saying “Without doubt Abiathar as high priest had the oversight of the sacrificial worship,” while noting it is surprising that no priest is named at the ark at all. We record the dispute and do not settle it. What v. 40 supplies is the standard the Gibeon staff is held to: הַכָּתוּב֙, the written thing. Ellicott identifies the rite precisely as the Tamid of Exodus 29:38 and Numbers 28:3, and JFB names the same texts. K&D reads the construction as a second commission rather than a mere measure, covering “everything that it was the priests' duty to do in the sanctuary.” Barnes draws the sharpest line between the two sites: the sacrifices commanded by the Law were offered at Gibeon, while at Jerusalem were offered voluntary additional sacrifices. ⚙ The Hebrew presses one figure through the whole verse: lə·ha·‘ă·lō·wṯ ʻōlōwṯ ʻal mizbaḥ hā‘ōlāh, causing the ascent-offering to ascend on the altar of ascent. Two sanctuaries stand miles apart on the ground, and the verb of the altar points straight up out of the argument.

iii. Heman, Jeduthun, and a text that stutters — vv. 41 to 42

Ellicott notes that the narrative now returns to its principal topic, the Levitical minstrels, and that Heman and Jeduthun serve at Gibeon as Asaph does at Zion. Poole catches the temper of v. 41 exactly: “so exceeding careful was this good king of God's worship, that he would have no person employed in it but such as he appointed to it.” Barnes identifies the men as those of 1 Chronicles 15:17 to 24, split between the two houses. Cambridge raises the awkward question of why Jeduthun stands here where other lists have Ethan, and answers with a conjecture, offered as a conjecture: “Probably there was a variation in the tradition as to the third name, two families competing each for the honour of its own ancestor.” The refrain given to Gibeon is the refrain already sung at Zion. Ellicott observes that the chronicler “repeats the liturgical formula of 1 Chronicles 16:34; probably with an allusion to odes like Psalms 136, in which these words constitute a continual refrain.” ⚙ The clause itself, כִּ֥י לְעוֹלָ֖ם חַסְדּֽוֹ, has no verb: English must add “endures.” Verse 42 then stutters. Ellicott, K&D and Cambridge all judge the repeated “Heman and Jeduthun” to be a copyist's importation from v. 41, absent from the LXX; K&D adds that the instruments listed include the priests' chătsôtsᵉrâh trumpets, which these two Levites did not blow. Poole and Benson both take שִׁ֣יר הָאֱלֹהִ֑ים as consecration, Benson adding the line that gives this movement its edge: “Between common mirth and holy joy, there is a vast difference.” Note what the chronicler does not do: he does not smooth his sources. A book often charged with idealising David preserves a doubled name, a dropped name, and a number that will not reconcile with its own chapter 26.

iv. Everyone home, and the king to his own door — v. 43

The chapter ends in dispersal. Gill notes that the people had accompanied the ark to its place and been refreshed with food, referring to 2 Samuel 6:19. Ellicott identifies v. 43 as a duplicate of 2 Samuel 6:19 to 20a, with two small differences he presses: “Departed. —Plural; Samuel has singular. Returned. —Rather, went round.” He then observes the chronicler's silence about what comes next in Samuel, Michal's encounter with David, “omitted by the chronicler as a matter of purely domestic interest.” K&D says the same and adds the constructive point about the last verb: לברך “is not to greet, but to bless his house, just as in 1 Chronicles 16:2 he had already pronounced a blessing on his people.” Geneva turns it into a rule of life, that after our duty to God we are chiefly bound to our own house. ⚙ One word does the closing work. Bayith (H1004) appears twice, for the people's houses and for David's, and the chronicler has just spent a chapter on a tent that is not a house and a dwelling that is not the ark's. In the very next chapter David will propose to build a bayith for the ark and be told that YHWH will build him one instead. This verse sets the word down on the table.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested by Scripture and not to be received on our authority. Read plainly, 1 Chronicles 16:37 to 43 is an administrative paragraph, and that is exactly what makes it strange. David has just brought the ark to Zion with a psalm, and the first thing he does afterward is split the staff. Song goes to a tent with no altar; blood goes to an altar with no ark. The chronicler does not call this a problem, and he does not call it ideal either. He simply writes the roster and leaves the seam showing, down to a plural pronoun with no plural antecedent that K&D calls a textual error and Pulpit refuses to repair by conjecture. We take that honesty as instruction. The word holding the two halves together is tāmîḏ, continuance. It is attached first to singing at Zion and then to burning at Gibeon, and in both places the content is the same confession, that his chesed is to forever. Henry's judgment seems to us right, that spiritual worship here takes its place early and that ceremonial worship, being divinely instituted, may not on that account be dropped. What we would add is that neither site is sufficient on its own, and the text knows it: the ark has the covenant but no altar, the dwelling has the altar but not the covenant chest, and Israel's worship is for two generations a thing split across two hills. That unfinished state is not a failure in the narrative; it is the narrative. It ends only when both are gathered into one, and the New Testament claims that gathering happened in a person rather than a building. We hold that reading as a conviction, not as a demonstration from this passage alone. What this passage demonstrates is smaller and surer: that God accepted worship on a schedule, from sifted men designated by name, in a divided arrangement He had not yet resolved, and that the king who set it up went home and blessed his own household. The line below is our own sentence, not Scripture, and should be weighed as such.

The ark had the covenant and no altar; the dwelling had the altar and no ark; and God accepted both, continually, until there should be One who was both.

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The three guilds fixed: Asaph, Heman, Jeduthun structural / thematic: confirmed

The names appointed in this unit become the standing rubric of Israel's temple music. The Verifier finds the same personal lexemes in the Levitical rosters of 1 Chronicles 25, in Solomon's dedication at 2 Chronicles 5:12, in Hezekiah's cleansing at 2 Chronicles 29:14 and Josiah's passover at 2 Chronicles 35:15, and still in the post-exilic list of Nehemiah 11:17. Ellicott already reads this unit as the founding division, with Heman and Jeduthun at Gibeon “as their colleague Asaph did in the tent on Zion,” and Pulpit calls the arrangement a permanent local ministry with fixity of place and regularity of time. ⚙ The link is one of institutional continuity, not of quotation: later writers are naming the same guilds, not citing this verse.

1 Chronicles 25:1 · 1 Chronicles 25:6 · 2 Chronicles 5:12 · 2 Chronicles 29:14 · 2 Chronicles 35:15 · Nehemiah 11:17

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H623 ʼÂçâph (in 41 vv) and H3038 Yᵉdûwthûwn (in 14 vv) across all six refs, with H1968 Hêymân (in 15 vv) at 2 Chronicles 29:14 and 1 Chronicles 15:19, and H4196 mizbêach (in 338 vv) at 2 Chronicles 5:12. Personal names recurring in parallel rosters establish a shared institution, not a verbal citation; tiered structural for that reason.

Jeduthun's name on the Psalter structural / thematic: confirmed

The guild leader appointed at Gibeon here leaves his name in three psalm superscriptions. Cambridge makes the connection explicit at this verse, listing “Psalms 39, 62, 77 (titles)” under Jeduthun, and notes the competing tradition in which Ethan stands third instead. ⚙ What the thread shows is that the administrative paragraph in front of us is the back office of the hymnbook: a roster entry in Chronicles becomes an attribution line over songs that Israel then sang for centuries. We claim no more than the shared name, which is what the Verifier records.

Psalm 39:1 · Psalm 62:1 · Psalm 77:1

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H3038 Yᵉdûwthûwn (in 14 vv) in all three superscriptions and in 1 Chronicles 16:38, 41, 42. A relatively infrequent name, but name-sharing across a title line and a roster is a link of personnel and attribution, not a quotation; Psalm 77:1 additionally shares H623 ʼÂçâph (in 41 vv).

Hosah at the gate verbal / quotation: confirmed

Hosah appears in v. 38 with no explanation and is not mentioned again in this unit. The Verifier locates him in David's full organisation of the doorkeepers, at 1 Chronicles 26:11, where his sons and brothers are numbered, and at 1 Chronicles 26:16, where the same rare name stands beside the word for gate. Cambridge sends the reader to that chapter for the doorkeeper system; Ellicott proposes supplying Hosah's name in the damaged clause at the head of v. 38, and Pulpit weighs the same proposal before declining it. ⚙ The lexeme is genuinely rare, which is why the link is firm: this is the same man, not a common noun.

1 Chronicles 26:11 · 1 Chronicles 26:16

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H2621 Chôçâh, rare (in 5 vv), plus H8179 shaʻar (in 302 vv) at 1 Chronicles 26:16. The rare lexeme fixes the identification at word level within one author's work; we note honestly that this is lexical identity of an uncommon personal name, not a citation of one passage by another.

The other Hosah: a homonym, flagged flagged: verify source

The Verifier also returns Joshua 19:29 on the same rare lexeme H2621. That verse, however, places Hosah on the border of Asher near Tyre, where it is a town, not the Levitical gatekeeper of this unit. ⚙ We include the candidate rather than suppress it, because suppressing it would hide how these links are computed: a shared Strong's number is evidence of a shared word, not of a shared referent. No commentator in our sourced set connects the two. Anyone building on this pair should verify the referent before using it.

Joshua 19:29

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H2621 Chôçâh, rare (in 5 vv). The shared lexeme is real, but the referents differ, a place-name in Asher against a Levitical doorkeeper, and no commentator in the brief links them; flagged rather than tiered.

The Tamid, and a sacrifice of praise offered continually structural / thematic: confirmed

Verse 40's תָּמִ֖יד is the standing morning and evening burnt offering; Ellicott names it the Tamid and cites Exodus 29:38 and Numbers 28:3, and JFB cites the same. Verse 37 attaches that same adverb to song. Hebrews works both halves: 10:11 describes a priest standing daily offering the same sacrifices which can never take away sins, and 13:15 calls for a sacrifice of praise offered to God through Him without interruption. ⚙ This is our reading of a shared pattern, and we are explicit about its limits. A Greek text cannot share a Hebrew Strong's number, so no verbal claim is possible here; the link is the doubled schedule, blood and voice, that this unit itself created and that Hebrews addresses in that order.

Exodus 29:38 · Numbers 28:3 · Hebrews 10:11 · Hebrews 13:15

basis: Within the Old Testament the basis is lexical and sourced: H8548 tâmîyd (in this unit at 16:37 and 16:40) is the technical term of the daily burnt offering, and Ellicott and JFB both cite Exodus 29:38 and Numbers 28:3 at this verse. The Hebrews refs are cross-Testament and therefore cannot share Strong's lexemes; they are joined on the pattern of perpetual offering and perpetual praise, never on a claim of quotation.

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

Ceremonies kept because they were types of the Mediator ancient/widely-held

The commentators in our set read v. 40 christologically without hesitation, and they say why. Benson: the sacrifices “must be kept up, because, however in their own nature they were inferior to prayer and praise, yet, as they were types of the mediation of Christ, the observance of them was of mighty importance.” Henry says the same, that the ceremonies being types of the mediation of Christ, their observance was of great consequence. ⚙ We note what this settles and what it does not. It settles that the persistence of the Gibeon altar, alongside a Zion tent where praise had already proved sufficient, is not mere conservatism on David's part; the older economy is still carrying something the new one cannot yet carry. Hebrews 9:11 to 12 and 10:1 make the same argument in the same terms, a shadow of the good things to come and a better tent not made with hands. This is the standard reading of the older commentators, recorded verbatim in the brief, and we pass it on as theirs.

Hebrews 9:11-12 · Hebrews 10:1

Two sanctuaries, one priesthood to come novel

This unit leaves Israel worshipping in two places with two priests. Cambridge notes that Abiathar may have been in charge of the ark while Zadok stood at Gibeon; K&D says without doubt Abiathar had the oversight of the sacrificial worship, and finds it surprising that no priest is named at the ark. Barnes counts above fifty years of a national worship divided between Gibeon and Jerusalem until Solomon's temple. ⚙ Our reading, offered as our own: the division is not resolved by Solomon's building either, since the rival priestly houses of this verse end with one deposed (1 Kings 2:26 to 27). The New Testament's answer is not a better building but a priest after the order of Melchizedek, appointed by an oath and holding his priesthood permanently because He continues forever (Hebrews 7:21, 7:24). We mark the christological frame as the ancient reading and the specific use of this verse's Zadok and Abiathar problem as our own construction.

Hebrews 7:21 · Hebrews 7:24

The king who goes round to bless his house novel

The chapter's last clause has David turning back to bless his household, and K&D ties it to v. 2, where he had already blessed the people in God's name. Geneva takes it as a duty of the head of a house, to pray for his family and to instruct them to praise God's Name. ⚙ Our reading: a king performing a priestly act on his own doorstep is a small anomaly in Israel, and Chronicles records it without comment, just as it records David wearing a linen ephod at 15:27. The New Testament's blessing of a household comes from a King who is also Priest, and Ephesians 1:3 gives the blessing in that order, from God through Christ to a people called a household. We do not claim any commentator in our sourced set draws this line from 1 Chronicles 16:43; the connection is ours, and it is the kind of figural reading that should be tested rather than assumed.

Ephesians 1:3 · Acts 3:25-26

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

Text. This unit sits on genuinely unsettled Hebrew and we have not hidden it. At v. 38 the plural suffix of וַאֲחֵיהֶ֖ם has no plural antecedent; K&D calls it a textual error and says at least one name has dropped out, Ellicott proposes supplying Hosah, Cambridge reports that the LXX reads simply “and his brethren,” and Pulpit weighs the proposals and declines them all. At v. 42 the opening “Heman and Jeduthun” is suspected by Ellicott, K&D and Cambridge alike of being copied in from v. 41; Ellicott notes the LXX, Syriac and Arabic omit the names. BSB prints the received text in both places, and so do we.

Numbers. The sixty-eight of v. 38 does not agree with the sixty-two assigned to Obed-Edom's house at 1 Chronicles 26:8. Ellicott and Pulpit both register the gap; neither resolves it, and neither do we.

Disagreement among sources. Was Zadok the high priest here? Ellicott reads the article as par excellence and says yes; Benson and Poole say no, he is the second priest, with Abiathar at the ark; K&D sides with the second view. Is the Jeduthun of v. 38 the chief musician? Gill allows the identification with Ethan; K&D separates them by tribe, Merarite against Korahite. We have recorded both sides in the voices rather than choosing.

Interlinear alignment. In vv. 37 and 43 the numbered word list follows the English word order rather than the Hebrew, so the index numbers used in our notes do not everywhere run in Hebrew sequence. Our literal renderings restore the Hebrew order and say so in the divergences.

What is machine and what is not. Every quotation above is a verbatim substring of a public-domain commentary named by its tag and resolved by code, never retyped by us. The lexicon glosses, parsings and Strong's numbers come from the Berean interlinear. Every paragraph marked ⚙ is our own fallible synthesis and carries no authority. The thread bases are the Verifier's computed shared lexemes, quoted with their frequencies; where a shared lexeme is a personal name we have said so, and where the referents plainly differ, as at Joshua 19:29, we have flagged the link rather than deleted it.

What we could not check. We have not verified the manuscript evidence behind the LXX readings reported by Ellicott, Cambridge and K&D; we report their reports. The Targum reading at v. 43, that David returned to bless the people rather than his house, reaches us through Gill and is likewise unverified here.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)