The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

1 Chronicles19:10–19

David Defeats Ammon and Aram

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

1 Chronicles 19:10–19 — David Defeats Ammon and Aram. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

10

When Joab saw the battle lines before him and behind him, he selected some of the best men of Israel and arrayed them against the Arameans.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

yō·w·’āḇ way·yar kî- hā·yə·ṯāh ham·mil·ḥā·māh ’ê·lāw pā·nîm p̄ə·nê- wə·’ā·ḥō·wr way·yiḇ·ḥar mik·kāl bā·ḥūr bə·yiś·rā·’êl way·ya·‘ă·rōḵ liq·raṯ ’ă·rām

Word by word16 · parsed
יוֹאָ֗בyō·w·’āḇWhen JoabH3097
√ Yôwʼâb — Joab, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיַּ֣רְאway·yarsawH7200
√ râʼâh — to see, literally or figuratively (in numerous applications, direct and implied, transitive, intransitive and causative)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
râʼâh: to see The unit is built on four acts of seeing (here, and at verses 15, 16, 19), and each one produces a decision. Joab sees a geometry, not an omen.
כִּֽי־kî-H3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
הָיְתָ֧הhā·yə·ṯāhH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iVerbQalPerfectthird person feminine singular
הַמִּלְחָמָ֛הham·mil·ḥā·māhthe battle linesH4421
√ milchâmâh — a battle (iArticleNounfeminine singular
milchâmâh: a battle Fronted here in construct with pânîm, so the noun is not the subject of a report but the thing that has a face turned toward Joab. It recurs at verses 14 and 17 to bracket the whole campaign.
אֵלָ֖יו’ê·lāwH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPrepositionthird person masculine singular
פָּנִ֣יםpā·nîmbefore himH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Nounmasculine plural
pânîm: the face, as the part that turns The lexicon's gloss is the point: a face is what turns. Joab's problem is that two faces are turned on him at once, and the same noun will describe his enemies' backs at verse 14 when they flee from his face.
פְנֵי־p̄ə·nê-H6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Nounmasculine plural construct
pânîm: the face (construct) The construct form binds face to battle. Ancient Hebrew has no word for a “line” in the military sense; the army's front is its face, and its rear is literally its behind.
וְאָח֑וֹרwə·’ā·ḥō·wrand behind himH268
√ ʼâchôwr — the hinder partConjunctive wawNounmasculine singular
ʼâchôwr: the hinder part A plain spatial noun, not a military term. The pairing of pânîm with ʼâchôwr is the whole tactical crisis in two words: whichever way Joab turns his face, his back is exposed.
וַיִּבְחַ֗רway·yiḇ·ḥarhe selectedH977
√ bâchar — properly, to try, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
מִכָּל־mik·kālsome ofH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholePreposition-mNounmasculine singular construct
בָּחוּר֙bā·ḥūrthe bestH977
√ bâchar — properly, to try, iVerbQalQalPassParticiplemasculine singular
bâchar: properly, to try, i(.e. select) The lexicon's root sense is to test and so to pick, which is why the same root yields both Joab's verb and the noun for his picked men. Cambridge explains the choice tactically: the chariots made the Arameans the graver threat, so Joab spent his best troops on them.
בְּיִשְׂרָאֵ֔לbə·yiś·rā·’êlmen of IsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobPreposition-bNounpropermasculine singular
וַֽיַּעֲרֹ֖ךְway·ya·‘ă·rōḵand arrayed themH6186
√ ʻârak — to set in a row, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
ʻârak: to set in a row The signature verb of this unit, used of Joab here, of Abishai's division in verse 11, and twice of David in verse 17. Ellicott observes that the same Hebrew phrase recurs in verse 11, so the two brothers do the identical thing in opposite directions.
לִקְרַ֥אתliq·raṯagainstH7122
√ qârâʼ — to encounter, whether accidentally or in a hostile mannerPreposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
qârâʼ: to encounter, whether accidentally or in a hostile manner The infinitive liqraṯ is not a preposition meaning “against” but a verb of meeting, and BSB flattens it. Ellicott notes on verse 14 that this same preposition was elsewhere rendered “to meet.” Joab does not merely oppose Aram; he goes out to meet it.
אֲרָֽם׃’ă·rāmthe ArameansH758
√ ʼĂrâm — Aram or Syria, and its inhabitantsNounproperfeminine singular
11

And he placed the rest of the troops under the command of his brother Abishai, who arrayed them against the Ammonites.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·’êṯ nā·ṯan ye·ṯer hā·‘ām bə·yaḏ ’ā·ḥîw ’aḇ·šay way·ya·‘ar·ḵū liq·raṯ bə·nê ‘am·mō·wn

Word by word11 · parsed
וְאֵת֙wə·’êṯAndH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
נָתַ֕ןnā·ṯanhe placedH5414
√ nâthan — to give, used with greatest latitude of application (put, make, etcVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
nâthan: to give, used with greatest latitude of application A Qal perfect rather than the consecutive imperfect chain around it, which slows the sentence at exactly the point where Joab divests himself of half his army.
יֶ֣תֶרye·ṯerthe restH3499
√ yether — properly, an overhanging, iNounmasculine singular construct
yether: properly, an overhanging, i(.e. a remainder) What is left over after the choosing of verse 10. The narrative arithmetic is blunt: the best go with Joab, the overhang goes to Abishai.
הָעָ֔םhā·‘āmof the troopsH5971
√ ʻam — a people (as a congregated unit)ArticleNounmasculine singular
בְּיַ֖דbə·yaḏunder the commandH3027
√ yâd — a hand (the open one (indicating power, means, direction, etcPreposition-bNounfeminine singular construct
yâd: a hand (the open one, indicating power, means, direction) The idiom of handing over. Joab keeps the harder enemy and gives his brother the rest, which JFB reads as deliberate: he attacks the more numerous and formidable host himself and directs Abishai against the Ammonites.
אָחִ֑יו’ā·ḥîwof his brotherH251
√ ʼâch — a brother (used in the widest sense of literal relationship and metaphorical affinity or resemblance (like father))Nounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
ʼâch: a brother, in the widest sense Named here, and again at verse 15 when the Ammonites break before him. The unit's command structure is a family, and the mutual pledge of verse 12 is the speech of one brother to another.
אַבְשַׁ֣י’aḇ·šayAbishaiH52
√ ʼĂbîyshay — Abishai, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
וַיַּ֣עַרְכ֔וּway·ya·‘ar·ḵūwho arrayed themH6186
√ ʻârak — to set in a row, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
ʻârak: to set in a row Plural here (“they arrayed”) against the singular of verse 10, which Ellicott flags: Samuel has the singular in both places. Two verbs of the same root, one for each front, is the sentence-level shape of a two-front war.
לִקְרַ֖אתliq·raṯagainstH7122
√ qârâʼ — to encounter, whether accidentally or in a hostile mannerPreposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
בְּנֵ֥יbə·nêthe AmmonitesH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural construct
עַמּֽוֹן׃‘am·mō·wn. . .H5983
√ ʻAmmôwn — Ammon, a son of LotNounpropermasculine singular
12

“If the Arameans are too strong for me,” said Joab, “then you will come to my rescue. And if the Ammonites are too strong for you, then I will come to your rescue.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

’im- ’ă·rām te·ḥĕ·zaq mim·men·nî way·yō·mer wə·hā·yî·ṯā lî liṯ·šū·ʿå̄·hs wə·’im- bə·nê ‘am·mō·wn ye·ḥez·qū mim·mə·ḵā wə·hō·wō·ša‘·tî·ḵā

Word by word14 · parsed
אִם־’im-IfH518
√ ʼim — used very widely as demonstrative, lo!Conjunction
אֲרָ֔ם’ă·rāmthe ArameansH758
√ ʼĂrâm — Aram or Syria, and its inhabitantsNounproperfeminine singular
תֶּחֱזַ֤קte·ḥĕ·zaqare too strongH2388
√ châzaq — to fasten uponVerbQalImperfectthird person feminine singular
châzaq: to fasten upon The root is grip, not force. The same verb returns twice in verse 13 as imperative and cohortative, so Joab measures the enemy's grip and then calls for his own: the word that names the danger becomes the word that names the remedy.
מִמֶּ֙נִּי֙mim·men·nîfor meH4480
√ min — properly, a part ofPrepositionfirst person common singular
min: properly, a part of Comparative min. One preposition carries the whole conditional.
וַיֹּ֗אמֶרway·yō·mersaid JoabH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
וְהָיִ֥יתָwə·hā·yî·ṯāthen you will comeH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConjunctive perfectsecond person masculine singular
hâyâh: to exist Conjunctive perfect after the conditional, the standard apodosis form: “then thou shalt become.” Joab does not ask Abishai to act; he tells him what he will be, namely a rescue.
לִּ֖יto my
Prepositionfirst person common singular
לִתְשׁוּעָ֑הסliṯ·šū·ʿå̄·hsrescueH8668
√ tᵉshûwʻâh — rescue (literal or figurative, persons, national or spiritual)Preposition-lNounfeminine singular
tᵉshûwʻâh: rescue (literal or figurative, persons, national or spiritual) Ellicott's observation that this is the rarer synonym, chosen by the Chronicler where Samuel has yĕshûʻāh, is the single most load-bearing lexical fact in the unit. The one word covers both a battlefield extraction and what the lexicon itself calls spiritual rescue, and its verbal cousin yâshaʻ closes the unit at verse 19.
וְאִם־wə·’im-And ifH518
√ ʼim — used very widely as demonstrative, lo!Conjunction
בְּנֵ֥יbə·nêthe AmmonitesH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural construct
עַמּ֛וֹן‘am·mō·wn. . .H5983
√ ʻAmmôwn — Ammon, a son of LotNounpropermasculine singular
יֶֽחֶזְק֥וּye·ḥez·qūare too strongH2388
√ châzaq — to fasten uponVerbQalImperfectthird person masculine plural
châzaq: to fasten upon Plural here for the sons of Ammon against the singular used of Aram, matching the grammatical gender and number the interlinear assigns each nation.
מִמְּךָ֖mim·mə·ḵāfor youH4480
√ min — properly, a part ofPrepositionsecond person masculine singular
וְהוֹשַׁעְתִּֽיךָ׃wə·hō·wō·ša‘·tî·ḵāthen I will come to your rescueH3467
√ yâshaʻ — properly, to be open, wide or free, iConjunctive wawVerbHifilConjunctive perfectfirst person common singularsecond person masculine singular
yâshaʻ: properly, to be open, wide or free The lexicon's root sense is spatial: to be made roomy, and so to be delivered out of a tight place. Joab's pledge is literally to make room for his brother. This verb and its noun in this verse are the two ends of one root, and the same Hiphil is what Aram refuses the Ammonites in verse 19.
13

Be strong and let us fight bravely for our people and for the cities of our God. May the LORD do what is good in His sight.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ḥă·zaq wə·niṯ·ḥaz·zə·qāh bə·‘aḏ- ‘am·mê·nū ū·ḇə·‘aḏ ‘ā·rê ’ĕ·lō·hê·nū Yah·weh haṭ·ṭō·wḇ ya·‘ă·śeh bə·‘ê·nāw

Word by word11 · parsed
חֲזַ֤קḥă·zaqBe strongH2388
√ châzaq — to fasten uponVerbQalImperativemasculine singular
châzaq: to fasten upon (Qal imperative) Addressed to Abishai alone, singular. The command is the answer to the two conditionals of verse 12: having named what might overpower them, Joab tells his brother to take hold.
וְנִֽתְחַזְּקָה֙wə·niṯ·ḥaz·zə·qāhand let us fight bravelyH2388
√ châzaq — to fasten uponConjunctive wawVerbHitpaelConjunctive imperfect Cohortativefirst person common plural
châzaq: to fasten upon (Hitpael cohortative) The reflexive stem turns the command inward and the cohortative turns it plural: let us make ourselves strong. Ellicott marks it as the same verb in reflexive form. Courage here is not a feeling that arrives but something an army does to itself, and Joab includes himself in the order he has just given.
בְּעַד־bə·‘aḏ-forH1157
√ bᵉʻad — in up to or over againstPreposition
bᵉʻad: in up to or over against Repeated at index 4 to cover both objects, people and cities.
עַמֵּ֔נוּ‘am·mê·nūour peopleH5971
√ ʻam — a people (as a congregated unit)Nounmasculine singular constructfirst person common plural
וּבְעַ֖דū·ḇə·‘aḏand forH1157
√ bᵉʻad — in up to or over againstConjunctive wawPreposition
עָרֵ֣י‘ā·rêthe citiesH5892
√ ʻîyr — a city (a place guarded by waking or a watch) in the widest sense (even of a mere encampment or post)Nounfeminine plural construct
ʻîyr: a city, a place guarded by waking or a watch The lexicon derives the noun from watching, which is precisely what these men are doing for them. Plural and in construct with God, not with Israel.
אֱלֹהֵ֑ינוּ’ĕ·lō·hê·nūof our GodH430
√ ʼĕlôhîym — gods in the ordinary senseNounmasculine plural constructfirst person common plural
ʼĕlôhîym: gods in the ordinary sense Suffixed “our God.” Cambridge draws the consequence that if these cities fell, false gods would be worshipped in them, and adds the sober historical observation that religious feeling often supplies the place of patriotism in the East. The stake Joab names is not territory but whose name is called on in the streets.
וַֽיהוָ֔הYah·wehMay the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉhôvâh: Jewish national name of God Fronted, with the waw. Ellicott notes the emphasis falls here, on the One who is Lord of hosts and God of battles, so that the sentence which began with a command to be strong ends by handing the verdict to someone else.
הַטּ֥וֹבhaṭ·ṭō·wḇdoH2896
√ ṭôwb — good (as an adjective) in the widest senseArticleAdjectivemasculine singular
ṭôwb: good (as an adjective) in the widest sense Definite, “the good,” and the object of the final verb. Ellicott: the Chronicler “lays stress on the auspicious word ‘good.’”
יַעֲשֶֽׂה׃ya·‘ă·śehwhat is goodH6213
√ ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest applicationVerbQalImperfectthird person masculine singular
ʻâsâh: to do or make, in the broadest sense Jussive force: a wish, not a prediction. Ellicott calls it “expressive of a pious wish that right may not miscarry.” Joab does not say the LORD will give victory; he says the LORD may do what He sees fit, which is a harder sentence to say while standing between two armies.
בְּעֵינָ֖יוbə·‘ê·nāwin His sightH5869
√ ʻayin — an eye (literally or figuratively)Preposition-bNouncdcthird person masculine singular
ʻayin: an eye (literally or figuratively) “In his eyes.” The unit's other eyes are all human and all see danger (verses 10, 15, 16, 19); this pair sees what is good, and its verdict is the one that stands.
14

So Joab and his troops advanced to fight the Arameans, who fled before him.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

yō·w·’āḇ wə·hā·‘ām ’ă·šer- ‘im·mōw way·yig·gaš lam·mil·ḥā·māh ’ă·rām way·yā·nū·sū mip·pā·nāw lip̄·nê

Word by word10 · parsed
יוֹאָ֜בyō·w·’āḇSo JoabH3097
√ Yôwʼâb — Joab, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וְהָעָ֧םwə·hā·‘āmand his troopsH5971
√ ʻam — a people (as a congregated unit)Conjunctive waw, ArticleNounmasculine singular
אֲשֶׁר־’ă·šer-H834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
ʼăsher: who, which, what, that Relative particle introducing the clause that binds the people to Joab.
עִמּ֛וֹ‘im·mōwH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iPrepositionthird person masculine singular
וַיִּגַּ֨שׁway·yig·gašadvancedH5066
√ nâgash — to be or come (causatively, bring) near (for any purpose)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
nâgash: to be or come near (for any purpose) Singular verb with a compound subject, standard Hebrew when the leader is named first: the army moves as one man because one man moves it. Cambridge reads the tactic exactly: “Without fear for their own rear advanced against the Syrian front.”
לַמִּלְחָמָ֑הlam·mil·ḥā·māhto fightH4421
√ milchâmâh — a battle (iPreposition-l, ArticleNounfeminine singular
milchâmâh: a battle Definite and preceded by l: he drew near to the battle, the one already described.
אֲרָ֖ם’ă·rāmthe ArameansH758
√ ʼĂrâm — Aram or Syria, and its inhabitantsNounproperfeminine singular
וַיָּנ֖וּסוּway·yā·nū·sūwho fledH5127
√ nûwç — to flit, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
nûwç: to flit, i(.e. vanish away) The lexicon's root sense is flitting, disappearing, not orderly retreat. Used three times in the next two verses, it is the verb that decides the first engagement: the mercenaries simply go.
מִפָּנָֽיו׃mip·pā·nāwbeforeH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-mNouncommon plural constructthird person masculine singular
pânîm: the face (as the part that turns) With min: from before his face. The face that was turned on Joab in verse 10 has now turned away from him.
לִפְנֵ֥יlip̄·nêhimH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNouncommon plural construct
pânîm: the face (construct) The interlinear splits the final phrase across indices 8 and 9 to match the English word order; in the Hebrew lip̄·nê stands earlier in the verse, before Aram.
15

When the Ammonites saw that the Arameans had fled, they too fled before Joab’s brother Abishai, and they entered the city. So Joab went back to Jerusalem.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ū·ḇə·nê ‘am·mō·wn rā·’ū kî- ’ă·rām nās hêm ḡam- way·yā·nū·sū mip·pə·nê ’ā·ḥîw ’aḇ·šay way·yā·ḇō·’ū hā·‘î·rāh yō·w·’āḇ way·yā·ḇō yə·rū·šā·lim

Word by word17 · parsed
וּבְנֵ֨יū·ḇə·nêWhen the AmmonitesH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural construct
עַמּ֤וֹן‘am·mō·wn. . .H5983
√ ʻAmmôwn — Ammon, a son of LotNounpropermasculine singular
רָאוּ֙rā·’ūsawH7200
√ râʼâh — to see, literally or figuratively (in numerous applications, direct and implied, transitive, intransitive and causative)VerbQalPerfectthird person common plural
כִּי־kî-thatH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
אֲרָ֔ם’ă·rāmthe ArameansH758
√ ʼĂrâm — Aram or Syria, and its inhabitantsNounproperfeminine singular
נָ֣סnāshad fledH5127
√ nûwç — to flit, iVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
nûwç: to flit, i(.e. vanish away) Qal perfect, singular, with Aram as a collective. Grammar alone tells you the mercenaries acted as one body and the allies did not.
הֵ֗םhêmtheyH1992
√ hêm — they (only used when emphatic)Pronounthird person masculine plural
hêm: they (only used when emphatic) Redundant by grammar, deliberate by rhetoric. The verb already carries “they”; the pronoun is added so the reader hears the echo of the first flight in the second.
גַם־ḡam-tooH1571
√ gam — properly, assemblageConjunction
gam: properly, assemblage “Also.” Two words of pure emphasis stand between the two flights.
וַיָּנ֣וּסוּway·yā·nū·sūfledH5127
√ nûwç — to flit, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
nûwç: to flit (consecutive imperfect, plural) The hinge of the day. Joab's plan of verse 10 never needed Abishai to win; JFB records the result exactly, that the mercenaries being defeated, the courage of the Ammonites failed.
מִפְּנֵי֙mip·pə·nêbeforeH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-mNouncommon plural construct
אָחִ֔יו’ā·ḥîwJoab’s brotherH251
√ ʼâch — a brother (used in the widest sense of literal relationship and metaphorical affinity or resemblance (like father))Nounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
אַבְשַׁ֣י’aḇ·šayAbishaiH52
√ ʼĂbîyshay — Abishai, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
וַיָּבֹ֖אוּway·yā·ḇō·’ūand they enteredH935
√ bôwʼ — to go or come (in a wide variety of applications)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
bôwʼ: to go or come (in a wide variety of applications) Plural, of the retreat into the walls. JFB notes they entrenched themselves within the fortified walls, which is why the war is not over at the end of this verse.
הָעִ֑ירָהhā·‘î·rāhthe cityH5892
√ ʻîyr — a city (a place guarded by waking or a watch) in the widest sense (even of a mere encampment or post)ArticleNounfeminine singularthird person feminine singular
ʻîyr: a city, a place guarded by waking or a watch The final he is parsed in our data as a third person feminine singular affix; the ordinary reading of the form is directional, into the city. A city is a guarded place, which is exactly what the Ammonites want from it and exactly what Joab said his own cities were for in verse 13.
יוֹאָ֖בyō·w·’āḇSo JoabH3097
√ Yôwʼâb — Joab, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיָּבֹ֥אway·yā·ḇōwent backH935
√ bôwʼ — to go or come (in a wide variety of applications)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃פyə·rū·šā·limto JerusalemH3389
√ Yᵉrûwshâlaim — Jerushalaim or Jerushalem, the capital city of PalestineNounproperfeminine singular
Yᵉrûwshâlaim: the capital city of Palestine The unit's one named Israelite place. Cambridge suggests Joab was wanted for the new danger gathering in the North; Pulpit reads the same departure as a decision not to besiege, and traces the rally of verse 16 to it. Both are inferences, not statements of the text, which simply says he came.
16

When the Arameans saw that they had been defeated by Israel, they sent messengers to bring more Arameans from beyond the Euphrates, with Shophach the commander of Hadadezer’s army leading them.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

’ă·rām way·yar kî nig·gə·p̄ū lip̄·nê yiś·rā·’êl way·yiš·lə·ḥū mal·’ā·ḵîm way·yō·w·ṣî·’ū ’eṯ- ’ă·rām ’ă·šer mê·‘ê·ḇer han·nā·hār wə·šō·w·p̄aḵ śar- hă·ḏaḏ·‘e·zer ṣə·ḇā lip̄·nê·hem

Word by word19 · parsed
אֲרָ֗ם’ă·rāmWhen the ArameansH758
√ ʼĂrâm — Aram or Syria, and its inhabitantsNounproperfeminine singular
וַיַּ֣רְאway·yarsawH7200
√ râʼâh — to see, literally or figuratively (in numerous applications, direct and implied, transitive, intransitive and causative)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
כִּ֣יthatH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
נִגְּפוּ֮nig·gə·p̄ūthey had been defeatedH5062
√ nâgaph — to push, gore, defeat, stub (the toe), inflict (a disease)VerbNifalPerfectthird person common plural
nâgaph: to push, gore, defeat, stub (the toe), inflict (a disease) The rarest of the verbs shared with the Verifier's cross-reference candidates (46 verses). It is the word used of a beast goring and of a plague striking, and its Niphal leaves the striker unnamed, which in a book written to David's glory is a restraint worth noticing. It returns in verse 19 to end the war.
לִפְנֵ֣יlip̄·nêbyH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNouncommon plural construct
יִשְׂרָאֵל֒yiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
וַֽיִּשְׁלְחוּ֙way·yiš·lə·ḥūthey sentH7971
√ shâlach — to send away, for, or out (in a great variety of applications)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
shâlach: to send away, for, or out The same diplomatic verb that set this whole war going earlier in the chapter. Aram's answer to defeat is not surrender but another embassy.
מַלְאָכִ֔יםmal·’ā·ḵîmmessengersH4397
√ mălʼâk — a messengerNounmasculine plural
mălʼâk: a messenger Human envoys. Kings in this chapter move by sending men, and every such sending so far has enlarged the war.
וַיּוֹצִ֣יאוּway·yō·w·ṣî·’ūto bringH3318
√ yâtsâʼ — to go (causatively, bring) out, in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively, direct and proximConjunctive wawVerbHifilConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
אֲרָ֔ם’ă·rām[more] ArameansH758
√ ʼĂrâm — Aram or Syria, and its inhabitantsNounproperfeminine singular
אֲשֶׁ֖ר’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
מֵעֵ֣בֶרmê·‘ê·ḇerfrom beyondH5676
√ ʻêber — properly, a region acrossPreposition-mNounmasculine singular construct
ʻêber: properly, a region across A relational noun: the far side, reckoned from the speaker's bank. Ellicott builds a source-critical argument on exactly this, that the phrase betrays a Palestinian writer.
הַנָּהָ֑רhan·nā·hārthe EuphratesH5104
√ nâhâr — a stream (including the seaArticleNounmasculine singular
nâhâr: a stream (including the sea) Definite and unqualified. The lexicon gives no proper name; the article does all the work, and Ellicott traces the Babylonian and Assyrian Purât back to an Accadian phrase meaning great river.
וְשׁוֹפַ֛ךְwə·šō·w·p̄aḵwith ShophachH7780
√ Shôwphâk — Shophak, a SyrianConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
Shôwphâk: Shophak, a Syrian Called Shobach at 2 Samuel 10:16. Ellicott notes the Hebrew letters p and b are much alike and compares the name with an Arabic root meaning to shed blood; Pulpit records that nothing else at all is known of the man except his death two verses later.
שַׂר־śar-the commanderH8269
√ sar — a head person (of any rank or class)Nounmasculine singular construct
הֲדַדְעֶ֖זֶרhă·ḏaḏ·‘e·zerof Hadadezer’sH1909
√ Hădadʻezer — Hadadezer, a Syrian kingNounpropermasculine singular
צְבָ֥אṣə·ḇāarmyH6635
√ tsâbâʼ — a mass of persons (or figuratively, things), especially regNouncommon singular construct
לִפְנֵיהֶֽם׃lip̄·nê·hemleading themH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNounmasculine plural constructthird person masculine plural
pânîm: the face (as the part that turns) Plural with suffix, “before them.” The verse opens and closes with the same noun, once for a rout and once for a command.
17

When this was reported to David, he gathered all Israel, crossed the Jordan, advanced toward the Arameans, and arrayed for battle against them. When David lined up to engage them in battle, they fought against him.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

way·yug·gaḏ lə·ḏā·wîḏ way·ye·’ĕ·sōp̄ ’eṯ- kāl- yiś·rā·’êl way·ya·‘ă·ḇōr hay·yar·dên way·yā·ḇō ’ă·lê·hem ’ă·rām way·ya·‘ă·rōḵ ’ă·lê·hem dā·wîḏ way·ya·‘ă·rōḵ liq·raṯ mil·ḥā·māh way·yil·lā·ḥă·mū ‘im·mōw

Word by word19 · parsed
וַיֻּגַּ֣דway·yug·gaḏWhen this was reportedH5046
√ nâgad — properly, to front, iConjunctive wawVerbHofalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
nâgad: properly, to front, i(.e. stand boldly out opposite) Hofal, the causative passive: it was made to be told. The lexicon's root sense is standing out in front of someone, which is what a report does. No messenger is credited, which keeps the sentence's weight on what David does next.
לְדָוִ֗ידlə·ḏā·wîḏto DavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JessePreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֶּאֱסֹ֤ףway·ye·’ĕ·sōp̄he gatheredH622
√ ʼâçaph — to gather for any purposeConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
ʼâçaph: to gather for any purpose Not a conscription term but the plain verb of collecting. What Joab did with a picked remnant in verse 10, David now does with all Israel; the escalation is in the object, not the verb.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
כָּל־kāl-allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
יִשְׂרָאֵל֙yiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
וַיַּעֲבֹ֣רway·ya·‘ă·ḇōrcrossedH5674
√ ʻâbar — to cross overConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
ʻâbar: to cross over The Jordan crossing is stated as bare fact. In the Chronicler's telling the king leaves the land to meet a threat from beyond another river entirely.
הַיַּרְדֵּ֔ןhay·yar·dênthe JordanH3383
√ Yardên — Jarden, the principal river of PalestineArticleNounproperfeminine singular
וַיָּבֹ֣אway·yā·ḇōadvancedH935
√ bôwʼ — to go or come (in a wide variety of applications)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
אֲלֵהֶ֔ם’ă·lê·hemtowardH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPrepositionthird person masculine plural
ʼêl: near, with or among “Unto them.” Ellicott records Professor Sayce's suggestion that the Helam of Samuel is Aleppo, the Halman of the Assyrian monuments, and offers the alternative that Helâmah was read as a common noun meaning “to their army.” Both are conjectures about a place nobody has found.
אֲרָם֙’ă·rāmthe ArameansH758
√ ʼĂrâm — Aram or Syria, and its inhabitantsNounproperfeminine singular
וַֽיַּעֲרֹ֖ךְway·ya·‘ă·rōḵand arrayed for battleH6186
√ ʻârak — to set in a row, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
ʻârak: to set in a row The unit's governing verb reaches the king. Joab arrayed, Abishai's men arrayed, and now David arrays, twice.
אֲלֵהֶ֑ם’ă·lê·hemagainst themH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPrepositionthird person masculine plural
דָּוִ֜ידdā·wîḏWhen DavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
וַיַּעֲרֹ֨ךְway·ya·‘ă·rōḵlined upH6186
√ ʻârak — to set in a row, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
ʻârak: to set in a row (second occurrence) Ellicott judges the repetition needless and suspects the subject has been changed in transmission. We keep the Hebrew as it stands and flag the difficulty rather than smoothing it.
לִקְרַ֤אתliq·raṯto engage [them]H7122
√ qârâʼ — to encounter, whether accidentally or in a hostile mannerPreposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
qârâʼ: to encounter, whether accidentally or in a hostile manner The same infinitive of meeting used of Joab in verses 10 and 11. The king's tactics are his commander's, repeated on a larger field.
מִלְחָמָ֔הmil·ḥā·māhin battleH4421
√ milchâmâh — a battle (iNounfeminine singular
וַיִּֽלָּחֲמ֖וּway·yil·lā·ḥă·mūthey foughtH3898
√ lâcham — to feed onConjunctive wawVerbNifalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
lâcham: to feed on Niphal, reciprocal: they fought with him, each side consuming the other. The lexicon's root gloss is not a curiosity here; it is the ancient metaphor that makes war and bread share a verb.
עִמּֽוֹ׃‘im·mōwagainst himH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iPrepositionthird person masculine singular
18

But the Arameans fled before Israel, and David killed seven thousand of their charioteers and forty thousand foot soldiers. He also killed Shophach the commander of their army.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

’ă·rām way·yā·nās mil·lip̄·nê yiś·rā·’êl dā·wîḏ mê·’ă·rām way·ya·hă·rōḡ šiḇ·‘aṯ ’ă·lā·p̄îm re·ḵeḇ wə·’ar·bā·‘îm ’e·lep̄ ’îš raḡ·lî wə·’êṯ hê·mîṯ šō·w·p̄aḵ śar- haṣ·ṣā·ḇā

Word by word19 · parsed
אֲרָם֮’ă·rāmBut the ArameansH758
√ ʼĂrâm — Aram or Syria, and its inhabitantsNounproperfeminine singular
וַיָּ֣נָסway·yā·nāsfledH5127
√ nûwç — to flit, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
nûwç: to flit, i(.e. vanish away) Singular again for Aram as one body, and the fourth flight in five verses. The second campaign ends the way the first did.
מִלִּפְנֵ֣יmil·lip̄·nêbeforeH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-m, Preposition-lNouncommon plural construct
יִשְׂרָאֵל֒yiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
דָּוִ֜ידdā·wîḏand DavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
מֵאֲרָ֗םmê·’ă·rām. . .H758
√ ʼĂrâm — Aram or Syria, and its inhabitantsPreposition-mNounproperfeminine singular
וַיַּהֲרֹ֨גway·ya·hă·rōḡkilledH2026
√ hârag — to smite with deadly intentConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
hârag: to smite with deadly intent The lexicon's gloss carries the intent, which is why this verb rather than a neutral one is used of a king counting his dead. Chronicles credits David directly, where verse 14 credited Joab only with drawing near.
שִׁבְעַ֤תšiḇ·‘aṯsevenH7651
√ shebaʻ — seven (as the sacred full one)Numbermasculine singular construct
shebaʻ: seven (as the sacred full one) The lexicon ties the number to fullness. Whatever the transmitted figure once was, the number as it stands reads as a complete slaughter.
אֲלָפִים֙’ă·lā·p̄îmthousandH505
√ ʼeleph — hence (the ox's head being the first letter of the alphabet, and this eventually used as a numeral) a thousandNumbermasculine plural
רֶ֔כֶבre·ḵeḇof their charioteersH7393
√ rekeb — a vehicleNounmasculine singular
rekeb: a vehicle The single most disputed word in the unit. Samuel has seven hundred chariots, Chronicles seven thousand of something; Barnes calls the related figure corrupt outright, JFB reports the scholarly split, and Cambridge and Pulpit both prefer Samuel. We record the Hebrew and the disagreement rather than choosing for the reader.
וְאַרְבָּעִ֥יםwə·’ar·bā·‘îmand fortyH705
√ ʼarbâʻîym — fortyConjunctive wawNumbercommon plural
אֶ֖לֶף’e·lep̄thousandH505
√ ʼeleph — hence (the ox's head being the first letter of the alphabet, and this eventually used as a numeral) a thousandNumbermasculine singular construct
ʼeleph: a thousand The lexicon derives the numeral from the ox's head being the first letter of the alphabet. Used twice in this verse, once for the chariot force and once for the infantry.
אִ֣ישׁ’îšfoot soldiersH376
√ ʼîysh — a man as an individual or a male personNounmasculine singular
ʼîysh: a man as an individual Singular collective with an adjective: literally “man, foot-going.” Hebrew counts armies by the single representative man.
רַגְלִ֑יraḡ·lî. . .H7273
√ raglîy — a footman (soldier)Adjectivemasculine singular
raglîy: a footman (soldier) An adjective from the word for foot. Against it stands Samuel's “horsemen,” and Cambridge's regional argument favours Samuel.
וְאֵ֛תwə·’êṯH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
הֵמִֽית׃hê·mîṯHe also killedH4191
√ mûwth — to die (literally or figuratively)VerbHifilPerfectthird person masculine singular
mûwth: to die (literally or figuratively), Hiphil Causative: David made Shophach die. Verse 16 introduced him as the commander of Hadadezer's whole allied army; two verses later he is a clause. The Hebrew keeps his title in both places, so the rank is what falls.
שׁוֹפַ֥ךְšō·w·p̄aḵShophachH7780
√ Shôwphâk — Shophak, a SyrianNounpropermasculine singular
שַֽׂר־śar-the commanderH8269
√ sar — a head person (of any rank or class)Nounmasculine singular construct
הַצָּבָ֖אhaṣ·ṣā·ḇāof their armyH6635
√ tsâbâʼ — a mass of persons (or figuratively, things), especially regArticleNouncommon singular
19

When Hadadezer’s subjects saw that they had been defeated by Israel, they made peace with David and became subject to him. So the Arameans were unwilling to help the Ammonites anymore.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

hă·ḏaḏ·‘e·zer ‘aḇ·ḏê way·yir·’ū kî nig·gə·p̄ū lip̄·nê yiś·rā·’êl way·yaš·lî·mū ‘im- dā·wîḏ way·ya·‘aḇ·ḏu·hū ’ă·rām wə·lō- ’ā·ḇāh lə·hō·wō·šî·a‘ ’eṯ- bə·nê- ‘am·mō·wn ‘ō·wḏ

Word by word19 · parsed
הֲדַדְעֶ֗זֶרhă·ḏaḏ·‘e·zerWhen Hadadezer’sH1909
√ Hădadʻezer — Hadadezer, a Syrian kingNounpropermasculine singular
עַבְדֵ֣י‘aḇ·ḏêsubjectsH5650
√ ʻebed — a servantNounmasculine plural construct
ʻebed: a servant The word that frames the verse. They are Hadadezer's servants in the first clause and David's servants by the third, and the Hebrew uses one root for both, so the transfer of allegiance is visible in the vocabulary before it is stated as a fact.
וַיִּרְא֞וּway·yir·’ūsawH7200
√ râʼâh — to see, literally or figuratively (in numerous applications, direct and implied, transitive, intransitive and causative)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
כִּ֤יthatH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
נִגְּפוּ֙nig·gə·p̄ūthey had been defeatedH5062
√ nâgaph — to push, gore, defeat, stub (the toe), inflict (a disease)VerbNifalPerfectthird person common plural
nâgaph: to push, gore, defeat, stub (the toe), inflict (a disease) The same Niphal as verse 16, and the same unnamed agent. Chronicles reports two seeings of the identical verb, and the second one ends the war: what Aram saw in verse 16 sent for reinforcements, what the vassals see here sends for terms.
לִפְנֵ֣יlip̄·nêbyH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNouncommon plural construct
יִשְׂרָאֵ֔לyiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
וַיַּשְׁלִ֥ימוּway·yaš·lî·mūthey made peaceH7999
√ shâlam — to be safe (in mind, body or estate)Conjunctive wawVerbHifilConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
shâlam: to be safe (in mind, body or estate) Hiphil, a causative of the shalom root: to put oneself in a state of wholeness with another party. It is the only occurrence of this root in the unit, and it arrives only after the flight, the slaughter and the death of the commander.
עִם־‘im-withH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iPreposition
דָּוִ֖ידdā·wîḏDavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
וַיַּֽעַבְדֻ֑הוּway·ya·‘aḇ·ḏu·hūand became subject to himH5647
√ ʻâbad — to work (in any sense)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine pluralthird person masculine singular
ʻâbad: to work (in any sense) With a third person suffix: they worked for him. Matthew Henry reads the political fact theologically, that the only safety of sinners consists in submitting to the Lord, seeking peace with him, and becoming his servants, which is a legitimate application of a verse that is, at its own level, a note on tribute.
אֲרָ֔ם’ă·rāmSo the ArameansH758
√ ʼĂrâm — Aram or Syria, and its inhabitantsNounproperfeminine singular
וְלֹא־wə·lō-were unwillingH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absConjunctive wawAdverbNegative particle
lôʼ: not The negative that governs the unit's closing verb.
אָבָ֣ה’ā·ḇāh. . .H14
√ ʼâbâh — to breathe after, iVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
ʼâbâh: to breathe after, i(.e. to be willing) The lexicon's root sense is breathing after a thing, desiring it. Aram does not lack the power to help Ammon; it has lost the appetite. Ellicott notes Samuel says instead that Aram feared, which names the same refusal from the other side.
לְהוֹשִׁ֥יעַlə·hō·wō·šî·a‘to helpH3467
√ yâshaʻ — properly, to be open, wide or free, iPreposition-lVerbHifilInfinitive construct
yâshaʻ: properly, to be open, wide or free The unit's last significant word, and the same Hiphil Joab used at verse 12. The pledge that opened the campaign (“then I will save thee”) is the thing Aram will no longer do for its allies. Between those two occurrences the noun of the same family, tᵉshûwʻâh, has also been spoken. The war begins and ends on the verb for salvation.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
בְּנֵי־bə·nê-the AmmonitesH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural construct
עַמּ֖וֹן‘am·mō·wn. . .H5983
√ ʻAmmôwn — Ammon, a son of LotNounpropermasculine singular
עֽוֹד׃פ‘ō·wḏanymoreH5750
√ ʻôwd — properly, iteration or continuanceAdverb
ʻôwd: properly, iteration or continuance “Any more.” One adverb closes the Aramean chapter of the war; the Ammonites are still inside their city, and the account of them resumes in the next chapter.

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. Two faces, and a host divided — 19:10-11

The unit opens on a man doing arithmetic under pressure. פְנֵי־הַמִּלְחָמָה is not a line but a face, and Ellicott gives the clause literally: “the front of the battle had become towards him, front and rear.” Ellicott also supplies the ground plan our sources agree on, that the Ammonites lay in front of the city and their Aramean allies at some distance in the plain, so that attacking either with the whole army would expose Joab's rear to the other. Pulpit states the resulting decision in the plainest terms, that Joab took the flower of all under his own command to face the Syrians in the field; Cambridge supplies the reason, that the Syrians were the more formidable because of the chariots they had. JFB agrees on the priority, noting that Joab resolved to attack the more numerous and formidable host himself while directing his brother Abishai, with a suitable detachment, against the Ammonites. ⚙ The Hebrew tells the same story twice over in its verbs: וַיִּבְחַר and בָּחוּר are one root, so Joab chooses from the chosen, and וַיַּעֲרֹךְ in verse 10 is answered by the plural of the same verb in verse 11, one act of ordering per front. Ellicott notices that the Chronicler has the plural where Samuel has the singular, and that the same Hebrew phrase recurs in both verses. And what Joab hands his brother is named exactly: יֶתֶר, the overhang, put בְּיַד, into the hand.

ii. The word for rescue, twice — 19:12-13

Joab's speech is the theological centre of the unit, and its two halves work differently. The first half is a contract: if Aram is stronger than I, you are to me for a תְּשׁוּעָה; if Ammon is stronger than you, I will save you. Ellicott is precise about the noun, that tĕshû‘āh here is “a less frequent synonym of yĕshû‘āh, the term in Samuel,” and about the verb, that it is often rendered “to save” with its cognate noun “salvation.” ⚙ That lexical pairing is worth weighing: the Chronicler reaches for the rarer of two words for rescue, and the verb standing beside it, יָשַׁע, is the one the lexicon derives from being made open, wide, free. Joab's offer to his brother is to make room for him. The second half of the speech is not a contract at all. Ellicott renders it literally, “And Jehovah, the good in his own eyes may he do,” notes that the Chronicler's word order differs from Samuel's, and concludes that “the spirit which inspired the prayer, ‘Thy will be done,’ was not unknown to the warriors of the old theocracy.” The Geneva margin presses the ethical condition behind it, declaring that where the cause is evil the courage cannot be valiant, and that in good causes men should be courageous and commit the success to God. Cambridge explains what makes the cause good here: “The cities which our God has given us and in which He is worshipped,” adding that if these were captured false gods would be worshipped in them. Matthew Henry, in a note printed against the whole chapter, draws the mutual pledge outward into warning: let us assist each other in a good cause, but let us fear lest, while made instruments of good to others, we come short of salvation ourselves.

iii. The rout, and the rally from beyond the River — 19:14-17

Cambridge catches the tactic in seven words: “Without fear for their own rear advanced against the Syrian front.” ⚙ The Hebrew of verse 14 turns on one noun: Joab draws near to the face of Aram and Aram flees from his face, the same פָּנִים that had been turned against him in verse 10. Verse 15 needs no second battle. JFB states the sequence flatly, that the mercenaries being defeated the courage of the Ammonites failed, so that taking flight they entrenched themselves within the fortified walls, and Ellicott insists the Hebrew tense makes the Ammonites' flight a reaction to a finished fact: “Now the sons of Ammon had seen that Aram was routed.” Why Joab then went home our sources will not agree on. Cambridge guesses he was wanted for the new danger gathering in the North; Pulpit reads it as a decision not to besiege and traces the consequence directly, that “we find these latter soon made bold to rally and to get additional aid.” Both are inference. The text says only that he came to Jerusalem. What follows in verse 16 is described in a word the lexicon renders “to push, gore, defeat, stub (the toe), inflict (a disease)”: Aram saw that they were struck, and sent for more. Ellicott turns the geography into a source-critical argument, observing that the phrase “beyond the river” for the eastern Arameans “shows that the narrative here borrowed by the chronicler was originally written in Palestine.” Cambridge lays out the whole war in three stages, from David's securing a position on the Euphrates, through the stage in which Zobah's troops acted as auxiliaries to Ammon, to the final stage ending in a formal peace, and notes that the whole allied army was now united under one general. At verse 17 the king himself crosses the Jordan, and Ellicott finds the Chronicler smoothing a difficulty: where Samuel names Helam, Chronicles has the bare preposition “unto them,” one consonant short of the place name, so that the Chronicler “seems to have substituted an intelligible phrase for the name of an unknown locality.” Cambridge and Pulpit both prefer Samuel's reading here. ⚙ And the verse that begins with David advancing ends with the Niphal of a root the lexicon glosses “to feed on”: they fought with him.

iv. Seven thousand, and a peace — 19:18-19

Verse 18 is where our sources argue openly, and we let them. Ellicott renders the Hebrew “seven thousand chariotry” and observes that Samuel reads seven hundred chariots and forty thousand horsemen, concluding that “such deviations seem to indicate independent sources” and that “we can hardly choose between the two accounts,” though he leans to horsemen. Pulpit objects arithmetically: “There could not be ten fighting men to a chariot,” and prefers Samuel. Cambridge adds a regional argument, that swarms of horsemen have usually formed the strength of armies raised on the eastern bank of the Euphrates. JFB reports the scholarly split by name, either a corrupt text in one of the books, on Keil and Davidson's view, or a combination of the accounts, on Kennicott's, Houbigant's and Calmet's. Barnes, writing on the chariot numbers earlier in the chapter, is blunter still, that such a number as 32,000 chariots alone was never brought into battle on any occasion. The Geneva margin simply prints the figures and sends the reader to 2 Samuel 10:18. ⚙ We record the Hebrew as it stands, note that two different verbs of killing are used in the verse, הָרַג for the army and the Hiphil הֵמִית for Shophach, and flag the numbers as disputed rather than resolving them. Verse 19 closes the war on three roots. Hadadezer's עֲבָדִים see that they were struck; they make themselves whole with David, וַיַּשְׁלִימוּ from the root of shalom; and they serve him, the verb of the noun they began the verse as. Ellicott catches the Chronicler's angle exactly: Samuel has them make peace “with Israel” and serve “them,” because “to the writer of Samuel God's people is the main topic; to the chronicler the divinely-anointed king.” Cambridge notes that we are told nothing of Hadadezer himself, who may simply have ceased hostilities without any treaty. And the last verb of the unit is לְהוֹשִׁיעַ: Aram would no longer save the sons of Ammon. Ellicott records that Samuel says Aram feared to; the Chronicler says Aram was not willing, using a root the lexicon glosses as breathing after a thing.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ This is our own fallible reading, offered to be tested against the text. The chapter is a campaign report, and it is held together by one root. At verse 12 Joab promises his brother a תְּשׁוּעָה and says וְהוֹשַׁעְתִּיךָ, I will save thee. At verse 19 the same Hiphil is what Aram will no longer do for Ammon: it was not willing לְהוֹשִׁיעַ. Between those two occurrences the whole war happens. Read as a unit, the passage is an essay on who can be relied on to save, and it answers by elimination: a hired coalition cannot, and by the end will not; a brother can, but only within the reach of his own arm; and the One whose verdict Joab hands the outcome to in verse 13 is never said to act at all. That silence is the honest shape of the text. The Chronicler does not write “and the LORD gave them into David's hand” here; he writes a passive, נִגְּפוּ, twice, with no agent named, and leaves it there.

⚙ What we find most instructive is the order of Joab's speech. He arranges everything he can arrange, the picked men, the two fronts, the mutual pledge, and then ends by saying that the LORD may do what is good in His eyes. He does not predict victory. Ellicott hears in that clause the same spirit as the prayer “Thy will be done,” and the Geneva margin ties it to the justice of the cause. A commander who trusted his own arrangements would have finished the sentence differently. The line below is ours, not Scripture, and should be weighed as such.

Joab arranges everything he can arrange, and then refuses to predict the outcome: that refusal, and not the seven thousand, is the piety in this chapter.

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The same day, told twice: Chronicles and 2 Samuel 10 structural / thematic: confirmed

Every one of our sources reads this unit against 2 Samuel 10, and several read Samuel as the better witness. Keil and Delitzsch state the relation at length, arguing that the Chronicler's peculiar historical notes “prove that the author of the Chronicle has not derived his account from the second book of Samuel,” while holding that the two narratives are perfectly agreed even in individual details, the divergences being inconsiderable. Ellicott works verse by verse in the opposite direction, cataloguing the differences: the plural verb at verse 11 where Samuel has the singular, the substituted phrase for Helam at verse 17, the abridged killing of Shophach at verse 18, the change of “with Israel” to “with David” at verse 19. ⚙ The Verifier's computed bases confirm real shared vocabulary across the parallel, but the shared lexemes are all common ones, so we record this as a shared narrative pattern rather than as a quotation.

2 Samuel 10:9 · 2 Samuel 10:10 · 2 Samuel 10:14

basis: Verifier: 2 Samuel 10:10 shares H7122 qârâʼ (in 134 vv), H6186 ʻârak (in 71 vv), H3499 yether (in 95 vv); 2 Samuel 10:9 shares H977 bâchar (in 164 vv), H758 ʼĂrâm (in 128 vv), H7122 qârâʼ (in 134 vv); 2 Samuel 10:14 shares H758 ʼĂrâm, H3097 Yôwʼâb (in 124 vv), H5983 ʻAmmôwn (in 98 vv). Every shared lexeme is common, so the tier is structural even though K&D and Ellicott treat the two records as accounts of one history.

Hadadezer, the name that dates the campaign structural / thematic: confirmed

Ellicott treats the name itself as evidence: “The name ‘Hadarezer’ (Hadadezer) is important, as helping us to identify this campaign with that of 1Chronicles 18:3-8.” The Verifier's bases support the link at the lexical level, since the name is genuinely uncommon in the Hebrew Bible. ⚙ A rare shared proper name, however, identifies the same historical figure; it does not constitute a quotation of one passage by another, so we keep the tier structural rather than promoting it on rarity alone. Cambridge frames the same material as a three-stage war, of which the Euphrates campaign of 1 Chronicles 18:3-8 is the first stage and this chapter the last two.

2 Samuel 8:10 · 1 Chronicles 18:10 · 1 Chronicles 18:5

basis: Verifier: 2 Samuel 8:10 and 1 Chronicles 18:10 each share H1909 Hădadʻezer (in 18 vv), the rarest lexeme among all computed bases for this unit, plus H4421 milchâmâh (in 308 vv); 1 Chronicles 18:5 shares H758 ʼĂrâm (in 128 vv) three times. Rarity here belongs to a proper name identifying one king, not to a quoted phrase, so the link is recorded as structural.

Struck down before Israel, and struck down before the Philistines structural / thematic: confirmed

The verb that reports both Aramean defeats, נִגְּפוּ (H5062), is a Niphal with no agent named: they were struck. The lexicon's range for the root is violent and physical, “to push, gore, defeat, stub (the toe), inflict (a disease).” ⚙ The Verifier lists 1 Samuel 4:10 among the candidates on this same verb together with the verb for flight, and the comparison cuts against Israel rather than for it: at the defeat recorded in 1 Samuel 4 the same verb is used of Israel itself. The word does not take sides. That is worth holding beside verses 16 and 19 here, where Chronicles twice declines to say who did the striking.

1 Samuel 4:10

basis: Verifier: shared H5062 nâgaph (in 46 vv) and H5127 nûwç (in 141 vv). H5062 is the least common verb shared with any candidate in this unit, but 46 verses is not rare enough to claim a quotation, and at 1 Samuel 4:10 the striking runs in the opposite direction, so the tier is thematic and not verbal.

The verb that becomes a name typological

The unit's closing root, יָשַׁע (H3467), is the ordinary Hebrew verb for saving, and Ellicott remarks on this very verse that it is often rendered “to save” and its cognate noun “salvation.” ⚙ The same root stands behind the name Yehoshua, and behind the Greek name given at Matthew 1:21, where the name is explained by what its bearer will do. We mark the connection as typological, not verbal: a Greek New Testament text and a Hebrew Old Testament text cannot share a Strong's number, and no shared lexeme is computable across the Testaments. The etymology is ancient and widely held; its application to Joab's battlefield promise is ours, and readers should weigh it as such.

1 Chronicles 19:12 · Matthew 1:21

basis: Cross-Testament Greek and Hebrew, so no shared Strong's lexeme is possible and no verbal tier is available. The recorded basis is the root H3467 yâshaʻ in verses 12 and 19 of this unit, and the standard etymology of the name explained at Matthew 1:21. Ancient as an etymology, novel as a reading of this passage.

Seven thousand chariotry: a figure the sources will not agree on flagged: verify source

The single hardest textual question in the unit is the count at verse 18, and the disagreement is not ours but our sources'. Barnes calls the related chariot figure of this chapter corrupt outright and argues from comparative military history that “such a number as 32,000 chariots alone was never brought into battle on any occasion,” adding that the largest force an Assyrian king ever speaks of encountering is 3,940. JFB sets the two scholarly options side by side, a corrupt text in one of the books, or a combination of the accounts. Cambridge and Pulpit both prefer the reading of 2 Samuel 10:18, Pulpit on arithmetic and Cambridge on regional military practice. Ellicott declines to choose but leans to Samuel's “horsemen.” Geneva simply refers the reader across. ⚙ We flag the figure rather than confirming any reconstruction of it, and we have kept the Hebrew of the verse as transmitted.

2 Samuel 10:18

basis: Provenance contested within our own sources: Barnes calls the transmitted chariot figure corrupt; JFB reports the split between Keil and Davidson (corrupt text) and Kennicott, Houbigant and Calmet (combined accounts); Cambridge and Pulpit prefer 2 Samuel 10:18; Ellicott says the two accounts can hardly be chosen between; Geneva refers the reader to Samuel. No Verifier lexeme basis is claimed for this link beyond the shared narrative; it is flagged for that reason.

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

The verb in Joab's promise novel

⚙ Joab tells his brother וְהוֹשַׁעְתִּיךָ, one word: I will save thee. It is the Hiphil of H3467, a root the lexicon derives from being made open, wide, free, that is, from being brought out of a tight place. Ellicott's note on this verse records that the verb is often rendered “to save” and its cognate noun “salvation,” and that the Chronicler has chosen the rarer noun tĕshû‘āh where Samuel has yĕshû‘āh. Seven verses later the same Hiphil is negated: Aram was not willing to save. The unit therefore begins with a promise of rescue between brothers and ends with rescue refused between allies, and no one in the chapter is finally able to guarantee it. Matthew 1:21 explains a name built on this root by what its bearer will do for his people. We offer that as a reading to be tested, not as a claim the Chronicler makes: the root connection is ancient and standard, the application to this battlefield pledge is our own.

1 Chronicles 19:12 · 1 Chronicles 19:19 · Matthew 1:21

The good in His own eyes ancient/widely-held

Joab ends his exhortation by surrendering the verdict: literally, in Ellicott's rendering, “And Jehovah, the good in his own eyes may he do.” Ellicott himself draws the line forward, writing that “the spirit which inspired the prayer, ‘Thy will be done,’ was not unknown to the warriors of the old theocracy,” and noting the Chronicler's deliberate stress on the word “good” and on the divine name. The Geneva margin adds the condition that makes such a prayer honest, that the cause itself must be good and the success committed to God. ⚙ The posture Ellicott identifies is the same one Gethsemane names, and it is recorded here in the mouth of a soldier rather than a psalmist, which is part of why it is striking. The attribution belongs to Ellicott; the resonance with Matthew 6:10 and 26:42 is the church's long reading, not our invention.

1 Chronicles 19:13 · Matthew 6:10 · Matthew 26:42

Made peace with him, and served him ancient/widely-held

The last political fact of the chapter is stated in two verbs built on two roots: Hadadezer's servants made themselves whole with David, וַיַּשְׁלִימוּ from the root of shalom, and then served him. Ellicott notes that the Chronicler's version fixes both on the anointed king where Samuel fixes them on Israel, since “to the writer of Samuel God's people is the main topic; to the chronicler the divinely-anointed king.” Matthew Henry, commenting on the chapter as a whole, reads that submission straight through to the gospel: “The only safety of sinners consists in submitting to the Lord, seeking peace with him, and becoming his servants.” ⚙ We record Henry's reading as his, note that it is a typological application and not the Chronicler's stated point, and observe that the Hebrew supports its shape at least this far: the verse turns enemies into servants by using one root for what they were and what they become.

1 Chronicles 19:19 · Psalm 2:11 · Romans 5:1

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

Text. Scripture is the Berean Standard Bible (CC0); the interlinear surfaces, transliterations, parses and Strong's numbers are the Berean data supplied in our brief. Where we say “literally,” we mean the Hebrew word order and morphology as given there, not a competing translation.

Word indices. The interlinear index order follows the English rendering, not the Hebrew. This matters in three places in this unit. At verse 10 the verb וַיַּרְא stands first in Hebrew but is indexed second. At verse 12 וַיֹּאמֶר opens the Hebrew sentence but is indexed fourth, inside the quotation. At verse 13 the glosses of indices 8 and 9 are offset against their surfaces: index 8 is הַטּוֹב, “the good,” glossed “do,” and index 9 is יַעֲשֶׂה, “may he do,” glossed “what is good.” At verse 14 the English “before him” is spread across two different Hebrew words, מִפָּנָיו at index 8 and לִפְנֵי at index 9, although לִפְנֵי stands earlier in the Hebrew sentence than the word indexed before it. Our notes describe the Hebrew forms, and we have said so at each point rather than silently reindexing.

Sources. Four of our nine commentators do not comment on these verses individually. Matthew Henry's entry is one note printed against the whole of 1 Chronicles 19. Keil and Delitzsch's entry is a single introductory essay on chapters 18 to 20, repeated against every verse and capped in our brief; we have quoted it only for what it claims about the unit as a whole. Barnes' entry as printed against these verses is in fact his discussion of the chariot numbers of 1 Chronicles 19:7. Poole is silent on every verse but 19:19, where his whole comment is a referral to his notes on 2 Samuel 10:18. We have marked each of these in the relevant editorial note rather than presenting them as verse commentary.

Typography in the sources. Our public-domain texts carry scanning errors, and we reproduce them rather than correct them inside a quotation. Ellicott on verse 11 reads “They sot themselves in array” for “set”; Cambridge on verse 16 reads “the final stage which ended la the conclusion of a formal peace” for “in.” Both are flagged where quoted.

What is uncertain. The numbers at verse 18 are disputed by our own sources and we have not resolved them; see the flagged thread. The location of Helam, which Samuel names at the equivalent of verses 16 and 17 and which Chronicles does not, is unknown; Ellicott passes on Professor Sayce's private suggestion that it is Aleppo, and we pass it on as a suggestion. Shophach appears as Shobach in Samuel, Hadadezer as Hadarezer in several of our sources, and we have kept each spelling as its source prints it. Nothing else is known of Shophach beyond his death. The identity of the striker in the two Niphal verbs נִגְּפוּ at verses 16 and 19 is not stated by the text, and we have not supplied one.

Cross-references. Every thread basis is the Verifier's computed output, quoted with its lexeme frequencies. No thread in this unit is tiered “verbal / quotation: confirmed”: no rare shared lexeme and no explicit New Testament citation of this passage was found, and the one cross-Testament link is tiered typological, where no shared Strong's number is possible at all.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)