Tamar, Judah’s daughter-in-law, bore to him Perez and Zerah. Judah had five sons in all.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·ṯā·mār kal·lā·ṯōw yā·lə·ḏāh lōw ’eṯ- pe·reṣ wə·’eṯ- zā·raḥ yə·hū·ḏāh ḥă·miš·šāh bə·nê kāl-
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
1 Chronicles 2:4–55 — . Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
Tamar, Judah’s daughter-in-law, bore to him Perez and Zerah. Judah had five sons in all.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·ṯā·mār kal·lā·ṯōw yā·lə·ḏāh lōw ’eṯ- pe·reṣ wə·’eṯ- zā·raḥ yə·hū·ḏāh ḥă·miš·šāh bə·nê kāl-
The sons of Perez: Hezron and Hamul.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
bə·nê- p̄e·reṣ ḥeṣ·rō·wn wə·ḥā·mūl
The sons of Zerah: Zimri, Ethan, Heman, Calcol, and Dara—five in all.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·ḇə·nê ze·raḥ zim·rî wə·’ê·ṯān wə·hê·mān wə·ḵal·kōl wā·ḏā·ra‘ ḥă·miš·šāh kul·lām
The son of Carmi: Achar, who brought trouble upon Israel by violating the ban on devoted things.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·ḇə·nê kar·mî ‘ā·ḵār ‘ō·w·ḵêr yiś·rā·’êl ’ă·šer mā·‘al ba·ḥê·rem
The son of Ethan: Azariah.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·ḇə·nê ’ê·ṯān ‘ă·zar·yāh
The sons who were born to Hezron: Jerahmeel, Ram, and Caleb.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·ḇə·nê ’ă·šer nō·w·laḏ- ḥeṣ·rō·wn lōw ’eṯ- yə·raḥ·mə·’êl wə·’eṯ- rām wə·’eṯ- kə·lū·ḇāy
Ram was the father of Amminadab, and Amminadab was the father of Nahshon, a leader of the descendants of Judah.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·rām hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- ‘am·mî·nā·ḏāḇ wə·‘am·mî·nā·ḏāḇ hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- naḥ·šō·wn nə·śî bə·nê yə·hū·ḏāh
Nahshon was the father of Salmon, and Salmon was the father of Boaz.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·naḥ·šō·wn hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- śal·mā wə·śal·mā hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- bō·‘az
Boaz was the father of Obed, and Obed was the father of Jesse.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·ḇō·‘az hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- ‘ō·w·ḇêḏ wə·‘ō·w·ḇêḏ hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- yi·šāy
Jesse was the father of Eliab his firstborn; Abinadab was born second, Shimea third,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’î·šay hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- ’ĕ·lî·’āḇ bə·ḵō·rōw ’eṯ- wa·’ă·ḇî·nā·ḏāḇ haš·šê·nî wə·šim·‘ā haš·šə·lî·šî
Nethanel fourth, Raddai fifth,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
nə·ṯan·’êl hā·rə·ḇî·‘î rad·day ha·ḥă·mî·šî
Ozem sixth, and David seventh.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
’ō·ṣem haš·šiš·šî dā·wîḏ haš·šə·ḇi·‘î
Their sisters were Zeruiah and Abigail. And the three sons of Zeruiah were Abishai, Joab, and Asahel.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·ʾaḥ·yō·ṯē·hɛm ṣə·rū·yāh wa·’ă·ḇî·ḡā·yil šə·lō·šāh ū·ḇə·nê ṣə·rū·yāh ’aḇ·šay wə·yō·w·’āḇ wa·‘ă·śāh- ’êl
Abigail was the mother of Amasa, whose father was Jether the Ishmaelite.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wa·’ă·ḇî·ḡa·yil yā·lə·ḏāh ’eṯ- ‘ă·mā·śā ‘ă·mā·śā wa·’ă·ḇî ye·ṯer hay·yiš·mə·‘ê·lî
Caleb son of Hezron had children by his wife Azubah and by Jerioth. These were the sons of Azubah: Jesher, Shobab, and Ardon.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·ḵā·lêḇ ben- ḥeṣ·rō·wn hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- ’iš·šāh wə·’eṯ- ‘ă·zū·ḇāh yə·rî·‘ō·wṯ wə·’êl·leh ḇā·ne·hā yê·šer wə·šō·w·ḇāḇ wə·’ar·dō·wn
When Azubah died, Caleb married Ephrath, who bore to him Hur.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
‘ă·zū·ḇāh wat·tā·māṯ ḵā·lêḇ ’eṯ- way·yiq·qaḥ- lōw ’ep̄·rāṯ wat·tê·leḏ lōw ’eṯ- ḥūr
Hur was the father of Uri, and Uri was the father of Bezalel.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·ḥūr hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- ’ū·rî wə·’ū·rî hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- bə·ṣal·’êl
Later, Hezron slept with the daughter of Machir the father of Gilead. He had married her when he was sixty years old, and she bore to him Segub.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’a·ḥar ḥeṣ·rō·wn bā ’el- baṯ- mā·ḵîr ’ă·ḇî ḡil·‘āḏ wə·hū lə·qā·ḥāh wə·hū šiš·šîm ben- šā·nāh wat·tê·leḏ lōw ’eṯ- śə·ḡūḇ
Segub was the father of Jair, who had twenty-three cities in the land of Gilead.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·śə·ḡūḇ hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- yā·’îr way·hî- lōw ‘eś·rîm wə·šā·lō·wōš ‘ā·rîm bə·’e·reṣ hag·gil·‘āḏ
But Geshur and Aram captured Havvoth-jair, along with Kenath and its sixty surrounding villages. All these were descendants of Machir the father of Gilead.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
gə·šūr- wa·’ă·rām ’eṯ- way·yiq·qaḥ ḥaw·wōṯ yā·’îr mê·’it·tām ’eṯ- qə·nāṯ wə·’eṯ- šiš·šîm bə·nō·ṯe·hā ‘îr kāl- ’êl·leh bə·nê mā·ḵîr ’ă·ḇî- ḡil·‘āḏ
After Hezron died in Caleb-ephrathah, his wife Abijah bore to him Ashhur the father of Tekoa.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’a·ḥar ḥeṣ·rō·wn bə·ḵā·lêḇ mō·wṯ- ’ep̄·rā·ṯāh ḥeṣ·rō·wn wə·’ê·šeṯ ’ă·ḇî·yāh wat·tê·leḏ lōw ’eṯ- ’aš·ḥūr ’ă·ḇî ṯə·qō·w·a‘
The sons of Jerahmeel the firstborn of Hezron: Ram his firstborn, Bunah, Oren, Ozem, and Ahijah.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·yih·yū ḇə·nê- yə·raḥ·mə·’êl bə·ḵō·wr ḥeṣ·rō·wn rām hab·bə·ḵō·wr ū·ḇū·nāh wā·’ō·ren wā·’ō·ṣem ’ă·ḥî·yāh
Jerahmeel had another wife named Atarah, who was the mother of Onam.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
lî·raḥ·mə·’êl wat·tə·hî ’a·ḥe·reṯ ’iš·šāh ū·šə·māh ‘ă·ṭā·rāh hî ’êm ’ō·w·nām
The sons of Ram the firstborn of Jerahmeel: Maaz, Jamin, and Eker.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·yih·yū ḇə·nê- rām bə·ḵō·wr yə·raḥ·mə·’êl ma·‘aṣ wə·yā·mîn wā·‘ê·qer
The sons of Onam: Shammai and Jada. The sons of Shammai: Nadab and Abishur.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·yih·yū ḇə·nê- ’ō·w·nām šam·may wə·yā·ḏā‘ ū·ḇə·nê šam·may nā·ḏāḇ wa·’ă·ḇî·šūr
Abishur’s wife was named Abihail, and she bore to him Ahban and Molid.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
’ă·ḇî·šūr ’ê·šeṯ wə·šêm ’ă·ḇî·hā·yil wat·tê·leḏ lōw ’eṯ- ’aḥ·bān wə·’eṯ- mō·w·lîḏ
The sons of Nadab: Seled and Appaim. Seled died without children.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·ḇə·nê nā·ḏāḇ se·leḏ wə·’ap·pā·yim se·leḏ way·yā·māṯ lō ḇā·nîm
The son of Appaim: Ishi. The son of Ishi: Sheshan. The son of Sheshan: Ahlai.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·ḇə·nê ’ap·pa·yim yiš·‘î ū·ḇə·nê yiš·‘î šê·šān ū·ḇə·nê šê·šān ’aḥ·lāy
The sons of Jada the brother of Shammai: Jether and Jonathan. Jether died without children.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·ḇə·nê yā·ḏā‘ ’ă·ḥî šam·may ye·ṯer wə·yō·w·nā·ṯān ye·ṯer way·yā·māṯ lō ḇā·nîm
The sons of Jonathan: Peleth and Zaza. These were the descendants of Jerahmeel.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·ḇə·nê yō·w·nā·ṯān pe·leṯ wə·zā·zā ’êl·leh hā·yū bə·nê yə·raḥ·mə·’êl
Sheshan had no sons, but only daughters. He also had an Egyptian servant named Jarha.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
lə·šê·šān hā·yāh wə·lō- bā·nîm kî ’im- bā·nō·wṯ ū·lə·šê·šān miṣ·rî ‘e·ḇeḏ ū·šə·mōw yar·ḥā‘
Sheshan gave his daughter in marriage to his servant Jarha, and she bore to him Attai.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
šê·šān ’eṯ- bit·tōw way·yit·tên lə·’iš·šāh ‘aḇ·dōw lə·yar·ḥā‘ wat·tê·leḏ lōw ’eṯ- ‘at·tāy
Attai was the father of Nathan, Nathan was the father of Zabad,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·‘at·tay hō·lîḏ ’eṯ- nā·ṯān wə·nā·ṯān hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- zā·ḇāḏ
Zabad was the father of Ephlal, Ephlal was the father of Obed,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·zā·ḇāḏ hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- ’ep̄·lāl wə·’ep̄·lāl hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- ‘ō·w·ḇêḏ
Obed was the father of Jehu, Jehu was the father of Azariah,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·‘ō·w·ḇêḏ hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- yê·hū wə·yê·hū hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- ‘ă·zar·yāh
Azariah was the father of Helez, Helez was the father of Elasah,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wa·‘ă·zar·yāh hō·lîḏ ’eṯ- ḥā·leṣ wə·ḥe·leṣ hō·lîḏ ’eṯ- ’el·‘ā·śāh
Elasah was the father of Sismai, Sismai was the father of Shallum,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’el·‘ā·śāh hō·lîḏ ’eṯ- sis·māy wə·sis·may hō·lîḏ ’eṯ- šal·lūm
Shallum was the father of Jekamiah, and Jekamiah was the father of Elishama.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·šal·lūm hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- yə·qam·yāh wî·qam·yāh hō·lîḏ ’eṯ- ’ĕ·lî·šā·mā‘
The sons of Caleb the brother of Jerahmeel: Mesha his firstborn, who was the father of Ziph, and Mareshah his second son, who was the father of Hebron.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·ḇə·nê ḵā·lêḇ ’ă·ḥî yə·raḥ·mə·’êl mê·šā‘ bə·ḵō·rōw hū ’ă·ḇî- zîp̄ mā·rê·šāh ū·ḇə·nê ’ă·ḇî ḥeḇ·rō·wn
The sons of Hebron: Korah, Tappuah, Rekem, and Shema.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·ḇə·nê ḥeḇ·rō·wn qō·raḥ wə·ṯap·pu·aḥ wə·re·qem wā·šā·ma‘
Shema was the father of Raham the father of Jorkeam, and Rekem was the father of Shammai.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·še·ma‘ hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- ra·ḥam ’ă·ḇî yā·rə·qo·‘ām wə·re·qem hō·w·lîḏ ’eṯ- šam·māy
The son of Shammai was Maon, and Maon was the father of Beth-zur.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·ḇen- šam·may mā·‘ō·wn ū·mā·‘ō·wn ’ă·ḇî ḇêṯ- ṣūr
Caleb’s concubine Ephah was the mother of Haran, Moza, and Gazez. Haran was the father of Gazez.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
kā·lêḇ pî·le·ḡeš wə·‘ê·p̄āh yā·lə·ḏāh ’eṯ- ḥā·rān wə·’eṯ- mō·w·ṣā wə·’eṯ- gā·zêz wə·ḥā·rān hō·lîḏ ’eṯ- gā·zêz
The sons of Jahdai: Regem, Jotham, Geshan, Pelet, Ephah, and Shaaph.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·ḇə·nê yā·hə·dāy re·ḡem wə·yō·w·ṯām wə·ḡê·šān wā·p̄e·leṭ wə·‘ê·p̄āh wā·šā·‘ap̄
Caleb’s concubine Maacah was the mother of Sheber and Tirhanah.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
kā·lêḇ pi·le·ḡeš ma·‘ă·ḵāh yā·laḏ še·ḇer wə·’eṯ- tir·ḥă·nāh
She was also the mother of Shaaph father of Madmannah, and of Sheva father of Machbenah and Gibea. Caleb’s daughter was Acsah.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wat·tê·leḏ Ša·ʿap̲ ’ă·ḇî maḏ·man·nāh ’eṯ- šə·wā ’ă·ḇî maḵ·bê·nāh wa·’ă·ḇî ḡiḇ·‘ā kā·lêḇ ū·ḇaṯ- ‘aḵ·sāh
These were the descendants of Caleb. The sons of Hur the firstborn of Ephrathah: Shobal the father of Kiriath-jearim,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
’êl·leh hā·yū bə·nê ḵā·lêḇ ben- ḥūr bə·ḵō·wr ’ep̄·rā·ṯāh šō·w·ḇāl ’ă·ḇî qir·yaṯ yə·‘ā·rîm
Salma the father of Bethlehem, and Hareph the father of Beth-gader.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
śal·mā ’ă·ḇî ḇêṯ- lā·ḥem ḥā·rêp̄ ’ă·ḇî ḇêṯ- gā·ḏêr
These were the descendants of Shobal the father of Kiriath-jearim: Haroeh, half the Manahathites,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·yih·yū ḇā·nîm lə·šō·w·ḇāl ’ă·ḇî qir·yaṯ yə·‘ā·rîm hā·rō·’eh ḥă·ṣî ham·mə·nu·ḥō·wṯ
and the clans of Kiriath-jearim—the Ithrites, Puthites, Shumathites, and Mishraites. From these descended the Zorathites and Eshtaolites.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·miš·pə·ḥō·wṯ qir·yaṯ yə·‘ā·rîm hay·yiṯ·rî wə·hap·pū·ṯî wə·haš·šu·mā·ṯî wə·ham·miš·rā·‘î mê·’êl·leh yā·ṣə·’ū haṣ·ṣā·rə·‘ā·ṯî wə·hā·’eš·tā·’u·lî
The descendants of Salma: Bethlehem, the Netophathites, Atroth-beth-joab, half the Manahathites, the Zorites,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
bə·nê śal·mā bêṯ le·ḥem ū·nə·ṭō·w·p̄ā·ṯî ‘aṭ·rō·wṯ bêṯ yō·w·’āḇ wa·ḥă·ṣî ham·mā·naḥ·tî haṣ·ṣā·rə·‘î
and the clans of the scribes who lived at Jabez—the Tirathites, Shimeathites, and Sucathites. These are the Kenites who came from Hammath, the father of the house of Rechab.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·miš·pə·ḥō·wṯ sō·p̄ə·rîm yō·šə·ḇū ya‘·bêṣ tir·‘ā·ṯîm šim·‘ā·ṯîm śū·ḵā·ṯîm hêm·māh haq·qî·nîm hab·bā·’îm mê·ḥam·maṯ ’ă·ḇî ḇêṯ- rê·ḵāḇ
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
⚙ The first woman named in Judah's register is Tamar, and the first verb is hers: יָלְדָה, Qal perfect, she bore. Ellicott states the matter without euphemism, that the twins were the fruit of her incest with Judah, and Gill compresses it to two words, "Through incest." JFB supplies the reason Judah stands at the head of the whole book at all: the privileges of the primogeniture had been transferred to him, and from his tribe the Messiah was to spring. So the line that will end in a king begins in a case the law would have burned a woman for.
⚙ Then, three verses later, it produces a man renamed after his crime. The interlinear puts עָכָר and עוֹכֵר side by side, H5917 and H5916, the same consonants twice: Achar the troubler. Ellicott prints the Hebrew jingle whole, "Achar 'ocher Yisrael," and Barnes judges that the form Achar was adopted here to assimilate the name to the Hebrew for troubler. Notice what the Chronicler has done. Of all Zerah's line he keeps four sages and one thief, and he keeps the thief under a name that is a verdict. The register is not flattering Judah. It is keeping accounts.
⚙ From v. 10 the Qal gives way to the Hifil, הוֹלִיד, and the verse rhythm becomes a drumbeat. Only once does the chain pause to say anything about a man: Nahshon is נְשִׂיא, an exalted one, prince of the sons of Judah. K&D notes that he was prince at the Exodus (Numbers 1:7, 2:3, 7:12), and Gill transmits Kimchi's and Jarchi's view that the title is written here for the honour of David. K&D also does the arithmetic that unsettles the list: three names cover the 430 years in Egypt, and four cover the 400 years from Nahshon to David, so several links must have been passed over. The genealogy is a selection, and its compiler knew it.
⚙ Then the count of Jesse's sons runs to seven and stops at David, and 1 Samuel 16:10 and 17:12 say eight. Barnes, JFB, Poole, Cambridge and K&D each meet the difficulty and none of them can close it from evidence; the shared guess is that one son died without issue. Cambridge goes further and says one seems deliberately passed over. We record the disagreement rather than hide it. What the Hebrew does say is worth more than the harmonisation: Eliab is בְּכֹרוֹ, his firstborn, and the register names him first and then walks straight past him, exactly as the LORD did at Bethlehem.
⚙ And then two women. וְאַחְיֹתֵיהֶם carries a masculine plural suffix: their sisters, the seven brothers' sisters. Cambridge observes that Joab and his brothers are always named after their mother, and K&D quotes Bertheau's reason that the father goes unmentioned because their more famous mother challenged the greater attention. In a patrilineal document, that is a concession made to fact.
⚙ Here the text itself fails us in places, and honesty requires saying so. At v. 18 the Hebrew has אִשָּׁה, a woman, with no possessive suffix, and בָנֶיהָ, her sons, with no clear antecedent. K&D: "The first half of the 18th verse is obscure, and the text is probably corrupt." Ellicott, Cambridge, Barnes and JFB each reconstruct it differently. At v. 24 Ellicott says the text is evidently corrupt and follows the Septuagint; Pulpit concedes that the solution will probably not yield to anything but a justly restored text. We pass these on as open.
⚙ What is not obscure is the direction of travel. Hezron at sixty marries the daughter of Machir (v. 21), and by v. 23 the offspring are reckoned sons of Machir, Manassites, holding twenty three towns east of Jordan. Barnes states the principle: they were reckoned sons of Machir rather than sons of Hezron because they cast in their lot with the Manassites. JFB says Jair had been adopted into Manasseh. Ellicott reads the marriage as the figure for a whole Hezronite branch amalgamating with the Machirites of Gilead. A tribal register, read closely, turns out to record the places where the tribal boundaries would not hold.
⚙ And Cambridge tells us why vv. 18 to 20 are here at all: it is quite in accordance with the mind of the Chronicler to single out the artificer of the tabernacle and tell his family history. Bezalel, in the shadow of God, is the point of that branch.
⚙ The firstborn's line, held back sixteen verses, now runs for seventeen, and its centre is v. 34. עֶבֶד, a servant; מִצְרִי, an Egyptian; יַרְחָע, Jarha. Sheshan has no sons. So he gives his daughter to his own slave לְאִשָּׁה, for a wife, and the line of Jerahmeel the firstborn of Hezron continues for thirteen generations through a foreigner's body. Cambridge states the legal effect: this was equivalent to making his servant his heir. JFB argues that Jarha must first have embraced the Jewish faith, and that his marriage led to his adoption into the tribe of Judah as well as to his becoming heir of the family property; Benson says Sheshan first gave him his freedom and then his daughter. Ellicott adds the law that governs the case, Deuteronomy 23:7 to 8, and concludes that this whole section proves an Egyptian element was recognised in Judah.
⚙ Two of those readings are inference. That Jarha was freed first, and that he converted first, are supplied by the commentators to make the marriage lawful; the Chronicler says only that Sheshan gave. Under-claiming is the right instinct here. But the fact itself needs no help: the register of the tribe from which Messiah comes runs, in one of its branches, straight through a slave out of Egypt, and it says so on purpose.
⚙ From v. 42 the word אָב stops meaning father. Strong's own entry allows it, "in a literal and immediate, or figurative and remote application," and here the remote sense takes over: father of Ziph, of Hebron, of Tekoa, of Beth-zur, of Madmannah, of Kiriath-jearim, of Bethlehem. Benson says it plainly, that Madmannah, Machbenah and Gibea are the names not of persons but of places. Barnes lists them as names it is not probable were ever borne by persons. Ellicott gives the key: these lists are tribal and topographical, rather than genealogical. Geneva, reading v. 42, glosses father as the chief governor or prince, "because the prince should have a fatherly care and affection for his people."
⚙ K&D resists a full topographical reading and insists Hebron and Mareshah must be persons here, on the ground that v. 44 uses הוֹלִיד, which can only denote the propagation of a race. That disagreement is real and we do not resolve it. Either way the closing verses are a gazetteer of southern Judah written in the grammar of a family.
⚙ And the last verse of all is the strangest. Scribes, סֹפְרִים, from a root Strong's glosses as to score with a mark as a tally or record: the men whose trade is exactly the trade that produced this chapter. They dwell at Jabez, and then the register says what they are: These are the Kenites, who came of Hammath, father of the house of Rechab. Barnes calls it remarkable that people of a race quite distinct from the Israelites should be included in the descendants of Judah, and concludes that Kenite families were actually regarded as of one blood with them. Cambridge notes that the Rechabites are here traced to a non-Israelite source. The tribe's own record ends by naming outsiders as its own.
⚙ Under Sola Scriptura, offered to be tested and corrected: this chapter is usually skipped as fifty two verses of names, and that judgement mistakes what kind of document it is. A genealogy is a claim about who belongs. Read for that, the list is doing something deliberate and repeated.
⚙ Four times over it records an entry that should not have been admitted. Tamar, the daughter-in-law who got her sons by deceiving Judah, opens the register (v. 4). Jether the Ishmaelite fathers Amasa inside David's own generation (v. 17). Jarha the Egyptian slave marries his master's daughter and carries the firstborn's line thirteen generations (vv. 34 to 41). And the Kenites, of a race quite distinct from Israel as Barnes says, are written into the closing verse as the scribal clans of Judah (v. 55). Set beside these, notice what the same list does to insiders: Achar is entered under a nickname meaning troubler (v. 7); Eliab the firstborn is named and passed (v. 13); Seled and Jether die without sons and the lines simply stop (vv. 30, 32).
⚙ So the register's own logic is not blood but grafting. It is not that pedigree does not matter; it is that this pedigree keeps being saved by people who had no pedigree in it. That is not read into the text. It is the pattern the text keeps recording, in its own grammar, about itself. If the reading is wrong, it is wrong by over-reading a compiler's mere accuracy as a compiler's intent, and we hold it loosely on that point. But the facts it rests on are all in the interlinear, and none of them is ours.
Not Scripture, a fallible reading offered for testing: the tribe that produced the King keeps its records by naming the outsiders who saved its line.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
⚙ The sons of Zerah at v. 6 are Zimri, Ethan, Heman, Calcol and Dara. At 1 Kings 4:31 Solomon is said to be wiser than Ethan the Ezrahite, and Heman, and Chalcol, and Darda. The Verifier confirms the shared lexemes, and one of them is decisive: כַּלְכֹּל (H3633, Calcol) occurs in two verses of the entire canon, this one and that one. Ellicott adds that Ezrah and Zerah are equivalent forms and that many manuscripts, the Syriac, the Targum and the Vulgate read Darda here. Cambridge agrees that the same four names occur in the same order. K&D weighs the objections at length and concludes the persons are most probably identical, while noting the four were not brothers by blood. We follow the lexical evidence and hold K&D's identification as probable rather than proven.
1 Kings 4:31
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H3633 Kalkôl (in 2 vv, effectively unique to this pair), H387 ʼÊythân (in 8 vv), H1968 Hêymân (in 15 vv). The rarity of H3633 makes this a genuine verbal link between the two lists, not a coincidence of common names.
⚙ K&D states the dependence directly: the five sons of Judah are given according to Genesis 38, and the names are found also in Genesis 46:12, from which the two sons of Perez are taken. Ellicott says the same of v. 5, and adds that Numbers 26:21 registers the clans of the Hezronites and Hamulites in the census of Moses. The Verifier supplies the lexical basis, including the rare name חָמוּל (H2538, Hamul), which occurs in three verses of the whole canon.
Genesis 46:12 · Numbers 26:21
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H6557 Perets (in 13 vv) and H2226 Zerach (in 21 vv) with Genesis 46:12; H6557 Perets and H2538 Châmûwl (in 3 vv, rare) with Numbers 26:21. K&D and Ellicott both state that the Chronicler is drawing these names from the Genesis and Numbers lists.
⚙ Ruth closes with a genealogy from Perez to David that runs through Hezron and Ram exactly as vv. 9 to 12 do. The Verifier records the shared lexemes; רָם (H7410) is uncommon, six verses in the canon. Cambridge notes the parallel at Ruth 4:18 to 22, K&D observes that the same genealogy is found there, and Gill notes that the order here matches. What Chronicles adds is the single word נְשִׂיא over Nahshon, a title Ruth does not give him. We tier this structural rather than verbal: two records of one lineage, not a citation of one by the other.
Ruth 4:19
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H2696 Chetsrôwn (in 17 vv) and H7410 Râm (in 6 vv). The link is a shared ordered lineage attested independently in both books, with no claim that either quotes the other.
⚙ At v. 31 the children of Sheshan are given as Ahlai, and v. 34 says Sheshan had no sons but daughters. Benson concludes from the two verses together that Ahlai was not a son but a daughter, and K&D calls her the heiress of Sheshan. At 1 Chronicles 11:41 Zabad son of Ahlai stands among David's mighty men, and a Zabad appears in this very line at v. 36. Gill draws the connection and says it confirms that the daughter given to Jarha was Ahlai. The lexeme אַחְלָי (H304) occurs in two verses only. We stop short of calling this verbal: what is shared is an identification of persons, not a quotation, and Ellicott and Cambridge both think Ahlai may be a clan name rather than an individual's.
1 Chronicles 11:41
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H304 ʼAchlay (in 2 vv, rare) and H2066 Zâbâd (in 8 vv). Despite the rarity, the link is an identification of persons across two lists, argued by Gill and K&D, not a textual quotation, so it is tiered structural rather than verbal.
⚙ יְרַחְמְאֵל (H3396), which Ellicott glosses "God pitieth," is a rare name: eight verses in the canon. Two of them are outside Chronicles, and at Jeremiah 36:26 a Jerahmeel the king's son is sent to seize Jeremiah and Baruch. Ellicott, commenting on vv. 35 to 41, observes that the last name of this branch, Elishama, falls near the date of the Elishama who was a prince under Jehoiakim (Jeremiah 36:12), and that six of the thirteen names in the branch recur in the house of David. He calls it at least a coincidence, and so do we. There is no claim here that the men are the same.
Jeremiah 36:26 · 1 Chronicles 24:29
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H3396 Yᵉrachmᵉʼêl (in 8 vv) with both refs. The shared lexeme is real and uncommon; the persons are almost certainly distinct, and Ellicott himself calls the overlap of names a coincidence. No identification is claimed.
⚙ Matthew 1:3 to 6 and Luke 3:31 to 33 carry this lineage from Perez to David. Ellicott, Cambridge, Geneva and Gill all note the correspondence, and Ellicott adds that Matthew calls Ram by the form Aram, which Chronicles keeps as Ram. No verbal tier is possible or honest here: the Evangelists write Greek and this chapter is Hebrew, so a shared Strong's number cannot exist between them. What is shared is the ordered sequence of persons, including Tamar, whom Matthew names in his list as this chapter does in v. 4.
Matthew 1:3-6 · Luke 3:31-33
basis: Cross-Testament link, so no shared Strong's lexeme is possible (Greek against Hebrew) and no verbal tier may be claimed. The recorded basis is the identical ordered name sequence Perez, Hezron, Ram, Amminadab, Nahshon, Salma, Boaz, Obed, Jesse, David, plus the shared naming of Tamar, noted by Ellicott, Cambridge, Geneva and Gill.
⚙ Verse 6 makes Zimri a son of Zerah, and v. 7 makes Carmi the father of Achar. Joshua 7:1 makes Achan son of Carmi, son of Zabdi, son of Zerah. Poole, JFB, Benson and Cambridge all identify Zimri with Zabdi and so close the gap. K&D refuses: either name may be an error for the other, or Zabdi may have been a son of Zimri, and "nothing certain can, however, be ascertained." The Verifier returns no candidate pair here, so the link rests entirely on the commentators' conjecture, and one weighty commentator declines it.
Joshua 7:1
basis: No Verifier candidate for this pair, and no shared lexeme is recorded in the brief. The connection rests solely on the commentators' identification of Zimri (H2174) with Zabdi, which Poole, JFB and Cambridge accept and which K&D expressly leaves undecided. Flagged so the reader does not take a conjecture for a datum.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ JFB gives the Chronicler's own reason for placing Judah first: the right of the primogeniture had been transferred to him, and from his tribe the Messiah was to spring. K&D, arriving at v. 51, calls Bethlehem without ornament "the birth-place of David and Christ." Between those two remarks the chapter walks the whole distance: Perez at v. 5, Boaz at v. 11, Jesse at v. 12, David last of seven at v. 15, and then, forty verses later, the town itself entered as a name in the register (vv. 19, 50, 51, 54). Matthew 1 and Luke 3 take the same sequence into Greek and put a person at the end of it. This is the apostolic reading of Judah's genealogy, and it is recorded here by Ellicott, Cambridge, Geneva, Gill and K&D alike.
Matthew 1:3-6 · Luke 3:31-33 · Micah 5:2
⚙ Sheshan had no sons. He gave his daughter to Jarha his Egyptian slave לְאִשָּׁה, for a wife, and the firstborn's line ran on through him for thirteen generations (vv. 34 to 41). Cambridge states the legal substance: this was equivalent to making his servant his heir. JFB notes that the marriage led to Jarha's adoption into the tribe of Judah as well as to his becoming heir of the family property. Ellicott points to Deuteronomy 23:7 to 8, which rules that in the third generation persons of Egyptian blood are to be treated as full Israelites.
⚙ ⚙ The figural reading is ours and we mark it novel. Paul's argument in Galatians 4:7, that you are no longer a slave but a son, and if a son then an heir, is not drawn from this passage and does not cite it. But the shape is the same shape, and it is not an allegory imposed on the text: it is the legal transaction the text records, in the tribe whose genealogy this is. Henry, writing over the whole chapter, reaches the same instinct in different words when he says that in Christ all are welcome to his salvation who come to him, and all have equal privileges. We offer the connection as a resonance to be tested, not as a claim that the Chronicler intended it.
Galatians 4:7 · Deuteronomy 23:7-8 · Ephesians 2:12-13
⚙ Verse 7 keeps one man from Zerah's branch and keeps him under a name that means trouble: Achar, who מָעַל (acted covertly, broke faith) בַּחֵרֶם, in the devoted thing. Ellicott records the Hebrew jingle and the valley of Achor that took its name from his execution; Barnes and JFB say the form Achar was chosen here to make the verdict audible in the name. The chêrem is what has been handed over to God and so withdrawn from human use, and Achar died under it with all that was his.
⚙ ⚙ Ours, and marked novel: Galatians 3:13 says Christ was made a curse for us, and Hosea 2:15 promises the valley of Achor for a door of hope. Neither text is quoted in this chapter and neither commentator in this brief draws the line. We note only that the Chronicler chose to preserve, in a register otherwise built of bare names, one man defined entirely by having taken what was devoted, and that Scripture elsewhere takes both his valley and his curse and turns them. The reading is a resonance, offered to be tested, not an exegesis of v. 7.
Joshua 7:25-26 · Hosea 2:15 · Galatians 3:13
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text. Three places in this unit are textually disturbed and no reading here should be leaned on hard. (1) v. 18: the Hebrew has אִשָּׁה without a possessive suffix and בָנֶיהָ with no clear antecedent; K&D calls the verse obscure and the text probably corrupt, Cambridge says the Heb. seems to be corrupt and the Septuagint gives no help, and Ellicott, Barnes and JFB each reconstruct the family differently. (2) v. 24: Ellicott calls the text evidently corrupt and follows the Septuagint's reading that Caleb went in to Ephrath; Cambridge concurs; Pulpit concedes the problem will probably not yield to anything but a justly restored text. (3) v. 42: K&D devotes a long discussion to the phrase "sons of Mareshah the father of Hebron" and Barnes lists two rival emendations. We have translated the Masoretic text as it stands in every case and flagged the doubt rather than smoothed it.
Names as places. From v. 42 onward אָב functions as founder, chief or lord of a town at least as often as it means father. Benson, Barnes, Geneva, Poole and Ellicott all say so; Ellicott goes furthest and calls the lists tribal and topographical rather than genealogical. K&D expressly resists the full topographical reading for Hebron and Mareshah. Our notes follow the disagreement rather than choose a side.
Numbers that do not agree. v. 15 makes David the seventh son; 1 Samuel 16:10 to 11 and 17:12 make him the eighth. v. 22 gives Jair twenty three cities; Judges 10:4 gives thirty; Deuteronomy 3:4 and this verse together imply sixty for the whole district. No commentator in the brief resolves either, and we do not.
Sources. Scripture text is the Berean Standard Bible (CC0). Parsing, transliteration and Strong's numbers are from the Berean interlinear as supplied in the brief. All ✦ commentary is verbatim public domain (Ellicott 1878, Henry 1706, Barnes 1834, JFB 1871, Poole 1685, Gill 1746 to 1763, Geneva 1599, Keil and Delitzsch 1860s, Cambridge Bible 1880s, Benson 1810s, Pulpit Commentary 1880s), selected by anchor and copied by machine, never retyped. Several K&D and Pulpit entries in the brief are capped; excerpts were taken only from the visible portion. Henry's note is written once for the whole of chapter 2 and comments on no single verse, which is why it appears only once here and is labelled as such. Cross-reference bases are Verifier output; where none exists, the thread is flagged.
What is uncertain and is ours. The sola reading and two of the three ⚙ Christ entries are marked novel and are the machine's own fallible construction. Everything sourced is attributed; everything unattributed in those sections is ours and may be wrong.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)