The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

1 Chronicles29:21–25

Solomon Anointed King

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

1 Chronicles 29:21–25 — Solomon Anointed King. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

21

The next day they offered sacrifices and presented burnt offerings to the LORD: a thousand bulls, a thousand rams, and a thousand lambs, along with their drink offerings, and other sacrifices in abundance for all Israel.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

lə·mā·ḥo·raṯ hay·yō·wm ha·hū way·yiz·bə·ḥū zə·ḇā·ḥîm way·ya·‘ă·lū Yah·weh ‘ō·lō·wṯ Yah·weh ’e·lep̄ pā·rîm ’e·lep̄ ’ê·lîm ’e·lep̄ kə·ḇā·śîm wə·nis·kê·hem ū·zə·ḇā·ḥîm lā·rōḇ lə·ḵāl yiś·rā·’êl

Word by word20 · parsed
לְֽמָחֳרַת֮lə·mā·ḥo·raṯThe next dayH4283
√ mochŏrâth — the morrow or (adverbially) tomorrowPreposition-lNounfeminine singular construct
mochŏrâth: the morrow, tomorrow H4283 occurs in only 32 verses, and Ellicott notes that this particular three-word formula, "on the morrow after that day," is found here only. The Chronicler is not padding the narrative: he separates the assembly's confession (v. 20) from its ratification in blood, so that the vow of one day is answered by the altar of the next.
הַיּ֣וֹםhay·yō·wm. . .H3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)ArticleNounmasculine singular
הַהוּא֒ha·hū. . .H1931
√ hûwʼ — he (she or it)ArticlePronounthird person masculine singular
וַיִּזְבְּח֣וּway·yiz·bə·ḥūthey offeredH2076
√ zâbach — to slaughter an animal (usually in sacrifice)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
zâbach: to slaughter an animal, usually in sacrifice A Qal consecutive imperfect, third masculine plural: the subject is the whole assembly of v. 20, not the priests alone. Gill identifies the actors as "David and the congregation." The verb names the killing itself, the point at which a confession stops being speech.
זְ֠בָחִיםzə·ḇā·ḥîmsacrificesH2077
√ zebach — properly, a slaughter, iNounmasculine plural
וַיַּעֲל֨וּway·ya·‘ă·lū. . .H5927
√ ʻâlâh — to ascend, intransitively (be high) or actively (mount)Conjunctive wawVerbHifilConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
ʻâlâh: to ascend, to cause to mount (Hifil) The causative stem is doing theological work: the worshippers cannot ascend, so they cause something else to ascend in their place. Paired with its cognate noun in the next word, the clause reads "they made-ascend ascendings."
לַיהוָ֣ה׀Yah·wehH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
The first of two occurrences of the covenant name in this verse, attached to the slaughter-offerings; BSB collapses it into the second.
עֹל֜וֹת‘ō·lō·wṯand presented burnt offeringsH5930
√ ʻôlâh — a step or (collectively, stairs, as ascending)Nounfeminine plural
ʻôlâh: that which goes up, the whole burnt offering Strong's glosses the root as "a step or stairs, as ascending." This is the offering in which nothing returns to the offerer. The Pulpit Commentary traces it back to Genesis 8:20 as the only sacrifice Genesis knows, which sets the thousand-fold offering here inside the oldest layer of worship rather than the newest layer of statecraft.
לַיהוָ֗הYah·wehto the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
אֶ֜לֶף’e·lep̄a thousandH505
√ ʼeleph — hence (the ox's head being the first letter of the alphabet, and this eventually used as a numeral) a thousandNumbermasculine singular
ʼeleph: a thousand Ellicott notes the word order, "Bullocks a thousand, rams a thousand," belongs to the later mode of Hebrew speech, one of the Chronicler's own linguistic fingerprints.
פָּרִ֨יםpā·rîmbullsH6499
√ par — a bullock (apparently as breaking forth in wild strength, or perhaps as dividing the hoof)Nounmasculine plural
par: a bullock Strong's derives the sense from breaking forth in wild strength. The heaviest and costliest animal heads the list, and the list descends by value: bulls, rams, lambs.
אֶ֛לֶף’e·lep̄a thousandH505
√ ʼeleph — hence (the ox's head being the first letter of the alphabet, and this eventually used as a numeral) a thousandNumbermasculine singular
אֵילִ֥ים’ê·lîmramsH352
√ ʼayil — properly, strengthNounmasculine plural
אֶ֖לֶף’e·lep̄and a thousandH505
√ ʼeleph — hence (the ox's head being the first letter of the alphabet, and this eventually used as a numeral) a thousandNumbermasculine singular
כְּבָשִׂ֥יםkə·ḇā·śîmlambsH3532
√ kebes — a ram (just old enough to butt)Nounmasculine plural
kebes: a lamb, a ram just old enough to butt The smallest of the three, and the one the daily offering used. Abundance here is not extravagance for its own sake but the ordinary offering multiplied a thousand times.
וְנִסְכֵּיהֶ֑םwə·nis·kê·hemalong with their drink offeringsH5262
√ neçek — a libationConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural constructthird person masculine plural
neçek: a libation, a drink offering H5262 is a construct plural with a third masculine plural suffix, "their libations," that is, the libations belonging to those animals. Barnes states the law behind the phrase: the drink offerings "appropriate to each kind of burnt-offering, and required by the Law to accompany them" (Numbers 15). Geneva glosses the word as "all kinds of liquor which they mingled with their sacrifices, as wine, oil, etc."
וּזְבָחִ֥יםū·zə·ḇā·ḥîmand other sacrificesH2077
√ zebach — properly, a slaughter, iConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural
zebach: properly a slaughter, a sacrifice The second use of the word, which Ellicott, Barnes and K&D all narrow to the thank-offering or peace-offering, the one sacrifice the offerer eats. This single word is the hinge into v. 22: the feast of the next clause is made of these carcasses.
לָרֹ֖בlā·rōḇin abundanceH7230
√ rôb — abundance (in any respect)Preposition-l, ArticleNounmasculine singular
rôb: abundance in any respect Not a decorative superlative. Because only the peace-offering was shared, abundance is the precondition of a national meal; Ellicott: "So that every one present might partake of the sacrificial meal."
לְכָל־lə·ḵālfor allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholePreposition-lNounmasculine singular construct
Construct "for-all-of": the preposition governs the whole nation, whether the whole nation was bodily present (Benson's first option) or represented by its assembled governors (Poole's second).
יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃yiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
The nation as one liturgical body, which is the Chronicler's constant subject.
22

That day they ate and drank with great joy in the presence of the LORD. Then, for a second time, they designated David’s son Solomon as king, anointing him before the LORD as ruler, and Zadok as the priest.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ha·hū bay·yō·wm way·yō·ḵə·lū way·yiš·tū ḡə·ḏō·w·lāh bə·śim·ḥāh lip̄·nê Yah·weh šê·nîṯ dā·wîḏ ḇen- liš·lō·mōh way·yam·lî·ḵū way·yim·šə·ḥū Yah·weh lə·nā·ḡîḏ ū·lə·ṣā·ḏō·wq lə·ḵō·hên

Word by word18 · parsed
הַה֖וּאha·hūThatH1931
√ hûwʼ — he (she or it)ArticlePronounthird person masculine singular
בַּיּ֥וֹםbay·yō·wmdayH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)Preposition-b, ArticleNounmasculine singular
וַיֹּאכְל֨וּway·yō·ḵə·lūthey ateH398
√ ʼâkal — to eat (literally or figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
ʼâkal: to eat Qal consecutive imperfect plural. The eating is liturgical, not incidental: it is the peace-offerings of v. 21 being consumed, which is why Barnes and the Pulpit Commentary spend v. 21 establishing whose share the meat was.
וַיִּשְׁתּ֜וּway·yiš·tūand drankH8354
√ shâthâh — to imbibe (literally or figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
shâthâh: to imbibe, to drink Paired with eating as the standard idiom of covenant meal (compare Exodus 24:11). Ellicott sends the reader to the feast at David's own accession in 1 Chronicles 12:39-40.
גְדוֹלָ֑הḡə·ḏō·w·lāhwith greatH1419
√ gâdôwl — great (in any sense)Adjectivefeminine singular
בְּשִׂמְחָ֣הbə·śim·ḥāhjoyH8057
√ simchâh — blithesomeness or glee, (religious or festival)Preposition-bNounfeminine singular
simchâh: gladness, blithesomeness, festival glee H8057 is the Chronicler's signature word for authorized worship, and the adjective gədōlāh (great) intensifies it. The joy is a stated fact of the text, not a mood the narrator supplies: this is the last thing the Chronicler records the nation doing under David.
לִפְנֵ֧יlip̄·nêin the presenceH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNouncommon plural construct
pânîym: the face, the part that turns The construct plural of face, governed by lamed. Poole, Benson and JFB each allow two senses, the ark's vicinity or the disposition of worship, and neither can be proved from the word alone.
יְהוָ֛הYah·wehof the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
שֵׁנִית֙šê·nîṯThen, for a secondH8145
√ shênîy — properly, double, iNumberordinal feminine singular
shênîy: second, double An ordinal feminine used adverbially. K&D: "The שׁנית refers back to 1 Chronicles 23:1, and the first anointing of Solomon narrated in 1 Kings 1:32." This one word is the Chronicler's own cross-reference, and every commentator in the brief builds their chronology on it.
דָּוִ֔ידdā·wîḏtime, they designated David’sH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
David named as father in the very sentence that transfers his throne; the Chronicler never lets Solomon appear apart from him.
בֶן־ḇen-sonH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine singular construct
לִשְׁלֹמֹ֣הliš·lō·mōhSolomonH8010
√ Shᵉlômôh — Shelomah, David's successorPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
וַיַּמְלִ֤יכוּway·yam·lî·ḵūas kingH4427
√ mâlak — to reignConjunctive wawVerbHifilConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
mâlak: to reign (Hifil: to make reign) Causative: the assembly makes Solomon reign. Human agency is real here, yet v. 23 will call the seat YHWH's own throne, and v. 25 will make YHWH the one who magnifies. The text holds both without resolving them.
וַיִּמְשְׁח֧וּway·yim·šə·ḥūanointing himH4886
√ mâshach — to rub with oil, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
mâshach: to rub with oil, to anoint H4886, the root behind mâshîach, Messiah. Qal, with no expressed object. The office is conferred by oil poured in public, and both Cambridge and Barnes stress that the earlier anointing (1 Kings 1:39) was hurried and partial, so that this is the deliberate, witnessed one.
לַיהוָ֛הYah·wehbefore the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
לְנָגִ֥ידlə·nā·ḡîḏas rulerH5057
√ nâgîyd — a commander (as occupying the front), civil, military or religiousPreposition-lNounmasculine singular
nâgîyd: a commander, one occupying the front H5057, in only 44 verses. Ellicott: "The king was Jehovah's vicegerent, as Zadok was His priest. The theocratic nature of the Israelite monarchy is again insisted upon." The noun keeps the throne derivative: a nāgîd leads at someone else's appointment.
וּלְצָד֖וֹקū·lə·ṣā·ḏō·wqand ZadokH6659
√ Tsâdôwq — Tsadok, the name of eight or nine IsraelitesConjunctive waw, Preposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
Zadok, of the line of Eleazar, anointed while Abiathar still lived. Benson holds that the act "only settled the reversion" of the office; JFB reads it as popular ratification of the coming change; Cambridge observes that the Chronicler "avoids narrating anything so derogatory to the highpriesthood" as Abiathar's deposition. The brief's sources genuinely disagree, and this note does not settle it.
לְכֹהֵֽן׃lə·ḵō·hênas the priestH3548
√ kôhên — literally one officiating, a priestPreposition-lNounmasculine singular
kôhên: one officiating, a priest Ellicott calls the notice "peculiar to the Chronicles." That a priest is anointed in the same breath as a king is the structural fact this unit rests on.
23

So Solomon sat on the throne of the LORD as king in place of his father David. He prospered, and all Israel obeyed him.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

šə·lō·mōh way·yê·šeḇ ‘al- kis·sê Yah·weh lə·me·leḵ ta·ḥaṯ- ’ā·ḇîw dā·wîḏ way·yaṣ·laḥ kāl- yiś·rā·’êl way·yiš·mə·‘ū ’ê·lāw

Word by word14 · parsed
שְׁ֠לֹמֹהšə·lō·mōhSo SolomonH8010
√ Shᵉlômôh — Shelomah, David's successorNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֵּ֣שֶׁבway·yê·šeḇsatH3427
√ yâshab — properly, to sit down (specifically as judgeConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
yâshab: to sit down, to sit as judge, to dwell Qal consecutive imperfect singular. Sitting is the formal act of accession, and the same root underlies the enthronement language of the Psalms and of Zechariah 6:13, where a priest sits on a throne.
עַל־‘al-onH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
כִּסֵּ֨אkis·sêthe throneH3678
√ kiççêʼ — properly, covered, iNounmasculine singular construct
kiççêʼ: a throne, properly a covered seat H3678, in 124 verses, but in construct with the divine name in only a handful. Ellicott sends the reader back to 1 Chronicles 28:5, where the phrase is "the throne of the kingdom of the LORD." The Chronicler's whole political theology sits in this construct: the seat is not Solomon's property, and abdication is not what is being described. Ellicott is careful that "It is not meant that David abdicated."
יְהוָ֧ה׀Yah·wehof the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
The covenant name as the possessor of the throne. Geneva takes the step the Hebrew invites: the kings of Judah "were figures of Christ, who was the true anointed."
לְמֶ֛לֶךְlə·me·leḵas kingH4428
√ melek — a kingPreposition-lNounmasculine singular
melek: a king With lamed, "for king," a purpose or capacity phrase. Note that v. 22 anointed him nāgîd and v. 23 seats him melek: the Chronicler moves from designation to office within two verses.
תַּֽחַת־ta·ḥaṯ-in place ofH8478
√ tachath — the bottom (as depressed)Preposition
tachath: the bottom, underneath, in place of Spatial before it is substitutional. Its second appearance in v. 24 makes the unit's shape visible.
אָבִ֖יו’ā·ḇîwhis fatherH1
√ ʼâb — father, in a literal and immediate, or figurative and remote applicationNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
David named as father, not as predecessor. The Chronicler binds the two reigns into one work.
דָּוִ֥ידdā·wîḏDavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
וַיַּצְלַ֑חway·yaṣ·laḥHe prosperedH6743
√ tsâlach — to push forward, in various senses (literal or figurative, transitive or intransitive)Conjunctive wawVerbHifilConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
tsâlach: to push forward, to prosper H6743, Hifil. The verb elsewhere carries the rush of the Spirit upon a man (its other candidate context in this brief is 1 Samuel 18:10, where the same root is used of a spirit coming forcefully on Saul). Here it is a bare narrative statement, and K&D ties it to David's charge in 1 Chronicles 22:13 that Solomon be strong and prosper.
כָּל־kāl-and allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
Construct "all of," governing Israel: the Chronicler's standard totality formula.
יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃yiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
וַיִּשְׁמְע֥וּway·yiš·mə·‘ūobeyed himH8085
√ shâmaʻ — to hear intelligently (often with implication of attention, obedience, etcConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
shâmaʻ: to hear intelligently, with attention and obedience H8085. The plural verb has all Israel for subject; the nation's hearing is the counterpart of the king's prospering. This is the same verb the Shema uses of hearing God, now used of hearing God's appointed king, which is exactly the tension Poole's four readings of "throne of the Lord" are trying to hold.
אֵלָ֖יו’ê·lāw. . .H413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPrepositionthird person masculine singular
24

All the officials and mighty men, as well as all of King David’s sons, pledged their allegiance to King Solomon.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·ḵāl haś·śā·rîm wə·hag·gib·bō·rîm wə·ḡam kāl- ham·me·leḵ dā·wîḏ bə·nê nā·ṯə·nū yāḏ ta·ḥaṯ ham·me·leḵ šə·lō·mōh

Word by word13 · parsed
וְכָל־wə·ḵālAllH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeConjunctive wawNounmasculine singular construct
הַשָּׂרִים֙haś·śā·rîmthe officialsH8269
√ sar — a head person (of any rank or class)ArticleNounmasculine plural
sar: a head person of any rank or class H8269. Ellicott identifies them as the administrative grandees enumerated in 1 Chronicles 27 and assembled in 28:1. The Chronicler's submission list is institutional before it is personal.
וְהַגִּבֹּרִ֔יםwə·hag·gib·bō·rîmand mighty menH1368
√ gibbôwr — powerfulConjunctive waw, ArticleAdjectivemasculine plural
gibbôwr: powerful, mighty H1368 is an adjective, "the powerful ones," used as a noun of David's warrior corps. Cambridge points to the decisive fact behind the word: "the faithfulness of Benaiah and the Cherethites and Pelethites was the main factor in the elevation of Solomon" (1 Kings 1:10, 38). The men who could have contested the throne are the first named as submitting.
וְגַ֕םwə·ḡamas well asH1571
√ gam — properly, assemblageConjunction
gam: also, even (properly assemblage) A small particle carrying the verse's whole force: not merely the officials, but even the rival heirs.
כָּל־kāl-allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
הַמֶּ֣לֶךְham·me·leḵof KingH4428
√ melek — a kingArticleNounmasculine singular
דָּוִ֑ידdā·wîḏDavid’sH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
בְּנֵ֖יbə·nêsonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural construct
bên: a son, a builder of the family name Construct plural. Benson faces the difficulty honestly: "by seniority, the title of David's other sons to the crown was prior to that of Solomon," and he attributes their submission to God inclining their hearts.
נָ֣תְנוּnā·ṯə·nūpledgedH5414
√ nâthan — to give, used with greatest latitude of application (put, make, etcVerbQalPerfectthird person common plural
nâthan: to give, to put, to set H5414, Qal perfect (not the consecutive imperfect that drives the rest of the unit). The shift of form sets the homage apart from the sequence of events as a settled state rather than another act in the chain. The same verb returns in v. 25 for what YHWH gives Solomon: the nation gives hand, and God gives majesty.
יָ֔דyāḏtheir allegianceH3027
√ yâd — a hand (the open one (indicating power, means, direction, etcNounfeminine singular
yâd: a hand, the open one, indicating power and means H3027. The commentators do not agree what the gesture was. JFB reports a living Eastern custom; Poole and Benson connect it to the oath of Genesis 24:2 and 47:29 while conceding it may be only "a phrase taken from that practice formerly used, though now neglected"; K&D rejects both derivations. The lexical sense (hand as instrument of power) is the one thing all of them can stand on.
תַּ֖חַתta·ḥaṯtoH8478
√ tachath — the bottom (as depressed)Preposition
tachath: underneath, beneath The unit's second use of the word, and the one that makes its shape audible: under David (v. 23), under Solomon (v. 24), while the throne itself belongs to YHWH.
הַמֶּֽלֶךְ׃ham·me·leḵKingH4428
√ melek — a kingArticleNounmasculine singular
melek: a king The title is repeated twice in one verse, once for David and once for Solomon, so that the homage is rendered to an office and not to a man.
שְׁלֹמֹ֥הšə·lō·mōhSolomonH8010
√ Shᵉlômôh — Shelomah, David's successorNounpropermasculine singular
Shᵉlômôh: Solomon, David's successor The name stands last in the Hebrew clause, after the preposition taḥaṯ that puts every other hand beneath him, so that the word order enacts the homage: officials, warriors and rival heirs are named first and the king last, at the bottom of the sentence and the top of the state. Ellicott notes that the accompanying phrase itself is unparalleled in Hebrew, which leaves the syntax carrying more of the meaning than the idiom does.
25

The LORD highly exalted Solomon in the sight of all Israel and bestowed on him royal majesty such as had not been bestowed on any king in Israel before him.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

Yah·weh ’eṯ- lə·ma‘·lāh way·ḡad·dêl šə·lō·mōh lə·‘ê·nê kāl- yiś·rā·’êl way·yit·tên ‘ā·lāw mal·ḵūṯ hō·wḏ ’ă·šer lō- hā·yāh ‘al- kāl- me·leḵ ‘al- yiś·rā·’êl lə·p̄ā·nāw

Word by word21 · parsed
יְהוָ֤הYah·wehThe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
The subject changes for the first time in the unit. Verses 21 to 24 have human plural subjects (they sacrificed, they ate, they made king, they gave hand); here YHWH is the actor, and everything Solomon holds is received.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
לְמַ֔עְלָהlə·ma‘·lāhhighlyH4605
√ maʻal — properly, the upper part, used only adverbially with prefix upward, above, overhead, from the top, etcPreposition-lAdverbthird person feminine singular
maʻal: the upper part, upward, above H4605 is an adverb of place, not degree. Solomon is set upward, which is the same picture as the burnt offering going up in v. 21, now inverted: what ascended from the nation to God returns as greatness placed on the king.
וַיְגַדֵּ֨לway·ḡad·dêlexaltedH1431
√ gâdal — to be (causatively make) large (in various senses, as in body, mind, estate or honor, also in pride)Conjunctive wawVerbPielConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
gâdal: to be great, causatively to make large H1431 in the Piel, with YHWH as subject. The same root and stem is used of God's own being magnified, and Psalm 104:1 pairs the root with hôd as the LORD's own clothing. The Chronicler's grammar therefore does something careful: the king's greatness is a derivative of the greatness that properly belongs to God.
שְׁלֹמֹה֙šə·lō·mōhSolomonH8010
√ Shᵉlômôh — Shelomah, David's successorNounpropermasculine singular
לְעֵינֵ֖יlə·‘ê·nêin the sightH5869
√ ʻayin — an eye (literally or figuratively)Preposition-lNouncdc
ʻayin: an eye Construct plural with lamed: the exaltation is placed where the nation can see it. Gill specifies the content of the greatness from the later narrative: "By giving him such a large share of wisdom and understanding in government."
כָּל־kāl-of allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
יִשְׂרָאֵ֑לyiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
וַיִּתֵּ֤ןway·yit·tênand bestowedH5414
√ nâthan — to give, used with greatest latitude of application (put, make, etcConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
nâthan: to give, to put The second nâthan of the unit. In v. 24 the nation gave hand under Solomon; here YHWH gives majesty upon him. The bare repetition of the verb, with the prepositions reversed (under, upon), is the Chronicler's summary of the whole transaction.
עָלָיו֙‘ā·lāwon himH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPrepositionthird person masculine singular
מַלְכ֔וּתmal·ḵūṯroyalH4438
√ malkûwth — a ruleNounfeminine singular
malkûwth: a rule, a kingdom, royalty H4438 is the abstract noun of kingship rather than the person of the king. The construct chain makes the splendour belong to the office.
ה֣וֹדhō·wḏmajestyH1935
√ hôwd — grandeur (iNounmasculine singular construct
hôwd: grandeur, majesty, splendour H1935, in only 24 verses, and one of the rarest weighty nouns in this unit. Elsewhere it is the majesty in which God clothes himself (Psalm 104:1, Psalm 111:3), the splendour Moses is told to place on Joshua as successor (Numbers 27:20), and the majesty the crowned priest bears in Zechariah 6:13. Ellicott adds Psalm 8:2 for the idiom "put glory upon." That this rare word is given to Solomon rather than possessed by him is the point of the verse.
אֲ֠שֶׁר’ă·šersuch asH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
לֹֽא־lō-had notH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absAdverbNegative particle
Negation governing kōl. K&D: "כּל is to be taken along with לא, nullus, and does not presuppose a number of kings before Solomon; it involves only more than one."
הָיָ֧הhā·yāhbeenH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
hâyâh: to exist, to become, to be Qal perfect. Literally the majesty "had not become upon" any other king: the verb keeps the majesty as something that comes to rest on a man from outside him.
עַל־‘al-bestowed onH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
כָּל־kāl-anyH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
מֶ֛לֶךְme·leḵkingH4428
√ melek — a kingNounmasculine singular
melek: a king Benson and Poole both read the comparison as covering Saul and David (and Poole adds "any of the former governors of Israel, the word king being oft used in a large sense"); K&D counts Ish-bosheth as well.
עַל־‘al-inH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃פyiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
לְפָנָ֖יוlə·p̄ā·nāwbefore himH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNouncommon plural constructthird person masculine singular
pânîym: the face, before The crux of the verse. Cambridge argues the word here expresses comparison rather than priority in time; K&D and the Pulpit Commentary read it temporally and then have to reckon with how few kings there were to be compared with. The Hebrew permits both, and this unit does not decide it.

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. The morrow that answers the vow — 29:21

⚙ The unit opens on a date, not an event: לְמָחֳרַת הַיּוֹם הַהוּא, "to the morrow of that day." Ellicott records that this exact formula stands here only in the Hebrew Bible. The Chronicler has just reported the assembly's blessing of the LORD in v. 20, and he refuses to let the confession end in the same day's breath. K&D states the logic: "To seal their confession, thus made in word and deed, the assembled dignitaries prepared a great sacrificial feast to the Lord on the following day." Gill supplies the mundane reason as well, that there was "not having time enough on that day to perform" it all, and locates the altar at the threshingfloor of Araunah (an inference from 1 Chronicles 21, not from this verse). The offerings themselves come in two classes, and the Hebrew marks the two with two separate לַיהוָה phrases that the English collapses into one. First the ascending offerings, of which nothing returns: the Pulpit Commentary traces the burnt offering back to Genesis 8:20 as the only sacrifice Genesis knows, "wholly consumed on the altar of fire, and supposed to ascend to heaven." Then זְבָחִים לָרֹב, which Ellicott, Barnes and K&D agree has narrowed by the end of the verse into thank-offerings, the one sacrifice the worshipper eats. Barnes gives the Levitical arithmetic: of peace-offerings for thanksgivings "only a small part was the priest's; the sacrificer and his friends feasted on the remainder." So the word "abundance" is not rhetoric but provision. Ellicott: "So that every one present might partake of the sacrificial meal." Benson and Poole each leave open whether "for all Israel" means on behalf of the nation or enough meat for the nation, and Poole adds a third option, that the assembled governors "may well pass under the name of all Israel, because they represented them all."

ii. One anointing, two offices — 29:22

⚙ The feast of v. 22 is the carcasses of v. 21, eaten לִפְנֵי יְהוָה with שִׂמְחָה גְדוֹלָה. Poole and Benson both allow that "before the LORD" may mean the ark's vicinity, "in courts or places as near to it as they conveniently could," or may name the manner of the act, worship rather than location; JFB weighs it the same way. Then the Chronicler drops in his own cross-reference, the single word שֵׁנִית, second. K&D: "The שׁנית refers back to 1 Chronicles 23:1, and the first anointing of Solomon narrated in 1 Kings 1:32." Cambridge describes what the first time had been: "Solomon hastily anointed in order to assert his claim to the throne against his brother Adonijah," and Barnes draws the consequence, that because the first appointment "was hurried and, comparatively speaking, private, David now thought it best formally to invest Solomon a second time with the sovereignty, in the face of all Israel." The grammar of the anointing is where this verse becomes theology. There is no object on the verb (Ellicott: "perhaps the suffix has fallen out"), and the anointing is לַיהוָה. K&D will not let that be spatial: "not: before Jahve, which ל cannot signify, but: 'to Jahve,' in accordance with His will expressed in His choice of Solomon." And the one verb governs two men: Ellicott offers the resulting reading, "anointed him as prince, and Zadoh as priest, to Jehovah," and draws the conclusion the Chronicler wants, "The king was Jehovah's vicegerent, as Zadok was His priest. The theocratic nature of the Israelite monarchy is again insisted upon." Note also that Solomon is anointed לְנָגִיד, prince or commander, not melek: Cambridge prefers the Revised Version's "prince." Zadok's anointing is the hardest thing in the verse, since Abiathar was still alive and still in office. Ellicott calls the notice "peculiar to the Chronicles"; JFB reads it as evidence "that his appointment met the popular approval"; Benson holds that the act "did not actually constitute him high-priest, but only settled the reversion"; the Pulpit Commentary suggests either a re-anointing or an anointing never before completed and admits "the fact of any previous ceremony of the kind does not happen to be narrated"; Cambridge says the Chronicler has Abiathar's deposition in mind but "avoids narrating anything so derogatory to the highpriesthood." These are five different solutions to one silence, and none of them is in the text.

iii. The throne that is not the king's — 29:23

⚙ Then the phrase the whole unit exists for: כִּסֵּא יְהוָה, the throne of YHWH, with Solomon sitting on it. Ellicott and Cambridge both refer it to 1 Chronicles 28:5, where the seat is called "the throne of the kingdom of the LORD." Barnes explains the construct by institution and promise, "because God had set it up and had promised to establish it." JFB is terse: "As king of Israel, he was the Lord's vicegerent." Benson grounds it in Israel's constitution, that the LORD "had the founding, he had the filling of their throne, by immediate direction." Poole is the most honest of them, listing four possible senses side by side, from the general truth that all thrones are the Lord's, to the messianic ("the throne of Christ the Lord, whose vicegerents David, and Solomon, and their successors were"), to a Hebrew brevity for the throne of the people of the LORD, to a genitive of the giver, since Solomon "had elder brethren" and came to the seat by gift rather than by right. Ellicott adds the necessary historical caution, "It is not meant that David abdicated," and observes that vv. 23 to 25 are "anticipative of the history of Solomon's reign," a summary placed here to show David's last wishes fulfilled. Two verbs close the verse. וַיַּצְלַח, he prospered, which K&D ties directly to David's charge: it "corresponds to the hope expressed by David (1 Chronicles 22:13)." And וַיִּשְׁמְעוּ אֵלָיו, they hearkened to him, which Gill reads against David's own history: "all Israel obeyed him; at once; whereas it was some time, even years, before all Israel obeyed David."

iv. Hands under, majesty upon — 29:24-25

⚙ The homage of v. 24 is described by an idiom nobody can quite locate. נָתְנוּ יָד תַּחַת, they gave hand under. Ellicott: the phrase "put hand under" is "not met with elsewhere" and "appears to be different from 'give hand to'" in 2 Chronicles 30:8, Lamentations 5:6 and Ezekiel 17:18; he concludes only that "An ancient mode of doing homage may be intended." JFB confidently describes a living custom, "putting a hand under the king's extended hand and kissing the back of it," citing 2 Kings 10:15. Poole and Benson connect it to the oath gesture of Genesis 24:2 and 47:29 while conceding it may be no more than "a phrase taken from that practice formerly used, though now neglected." K&D rejects both derivations and falls back on the lexicon: "The hand, as the instrument of all activity, is here simply a symbol of power." We follow K&D here, because it claims least. What the verse does state is who submitted: the sārîm whom Ellicott identifies as the grandees of chapters 27 and 28, the gibbôrîm of whom Cambridge notes that "the faithfulness of Benaiah and the Cherethites and Pelethites was the main factor in the elevation of Solomon," and then, with the emphatic וְגַם, the king's own sons. Benson names the difficulty without flinching: "by seniority, the title of David's other sons to the crown was prior to that of Solomon, and they might think themselves wronged by his advancement." Cambridge hears a glance at Adonijah's submission in 1 Kings 1:53; K&D says such a reference can "hardly" be there. Verse 25 then changes subject for the first time in the unit. Every prior verb had a human plural subject; now YHWH magnifies (Piel of gâdal) and YHWH gives. What he gives is הוֹד מַלְכוּת, and Ellicott gives the literal force, "and put upon him a glory of kingship that had not become on any king over Israel before him," noting the idiom's occurrence in Psalm 8:2. Benson unpacks the content as "great honour and reputation, together with riches and power"; Gill adds "such a large share of wisdom and understanding in government"; Poole allows that "king" here may be "used in a large sense for any governor." The final clause is a real crux. K&D reads it temporally and restricts the scope, "כּל is to be taken along with לא, nullus, and does not presuppose a number of kings before Solomon; it involves only more than one." Cambridge dissolves the problem grammatically: the preposition "is sometimes used to express comparison without reference to time," so the sense is that no king of Israel ever exceeded him. The Pulpit Commentary looks forward instead, to the larger promise of 2 Chronicles 1:12, as "what may really have been present to the mind of the historian." The unit therefore ends where it began, with a gift: the nation gave hand under Solomon, and God gave majesty upon him.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ Read on its own terms, this is the least triumphant coronation in Scripture, and that is deliberate. Count the givers. The assembly gives slaughter, ascent and libation (v. 21). It gives a meal and an anointing (v. 22). The officials, the mighty men and the rival heirs give hand (v. 24). And then the subject changes, and God gives majesty (v. 25). Everything the nation can hand over goes downward or underneath: offerings ascend out of their possession, hands go under the king, the king himself sits in place of his father. Only one thing in the unit comes down from above, and it is the rare noun hôd, the splendour that Psalm 104:1 says God wears. The Chronicler will not let Solomon own anything: not the throne (it is YHWH's), not the office (he is anointed nāgîd, a commander at another's appointment), not the glory (it is placed on him), not even the prospering (a Hifil that K&D reads as David's prayer answered). Even the two anointings of v. 22 refuse to separate crown from altar: one verb, two men, king and priest sworn in the same act to the same LORD. What follows in the canon is the test of this reading. The man who received a kingdom he did not own will build a house, and then divide a nation, and the throne called YHWH's will outlast the dynasty that sat on it. So the unit is not finally about Solomon at all. It is about a seat that can be occupied but never inherited, and a majesty that can be worn but never earned, which is why Henry, Geneva, Poole and Barnes all reach past Solomon for someone who could hold both without reservation. We hold that reading as theirs, and as ours, and offer it to be tested.

Not a verse, a reading: every hand in this chapter goes under, and only the majesty comes down.

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The hurried anointing and the deliberate one structural / thematic: confirmed

The Chronicler's own word שֵׁנִית (H8145, "a second time") points back to the anointing of 1 Kings 1:34 and 1:39, and the Verifier confirms three shared lexemes across the pair. K&D states the reference: "The שׁנית refers back to 1 Chronicles 23:1, and the first anointing of Solomon narrated in 1 Kings 1:32." Cambridge describes what that first act was, "Solomon hastily anointed in order to assert his claim to the throne against his brother Adonijah," and Barnes draws out why a second was needed: the first "was hurried and, comparatively speaking, private." ⚙ We tier this structural rather than verbal: the shared lexemes are a proper name, a priest's name and a common verb of anointing, none of them rare, and Chronicles quotes nothing from Kings here. What is confirmed is a deliberate internal back-reference, not a quotation.

1 Kings 1:34 · 1 Kings 1:39 · 1 Chronicles 23:1

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H4886 mâshach (in 66 vv), H6659 Tsâdôwq (in 50 vv), H8010 Shᵉlômôh (in 263 vv). All three are common, so the link is a real narrative and lexical parallel, not a verbal citation; the Chronicler's own שֵׁנִית supplies the internal reference.

The majesty placed on a successor structural / thematic: confirmed

הוֹד (hôd, H1935) is rare, standing in only 24 verses, and Numbers 27:20 is the one other place where it passes from one man to his appointed successor: Moses is told to place some of his own hôd on Joshua. ⚙ Running the pair through the Verifier returns both hôd and nâthan as shared, so the construction "give hôd upon" as well as the noun links the two successions. Ellicott independently gathers the idiom from elsewhere: "The phrase 'put glory upon . . .' ( nāthan hôd ‘al . . . ) occurs in Psalm 8:2." The difference is the giver. Moses transfers what he has; here YHWH himself is the subject of both verbs, so Solomon's majesty is not David's handed down but God's laid on.

Numbers 27:20 · Psalm 8:2

basis: Verifier pair check (1 Chronicles 29:25 / Numbers 27:20): shared H1935 hôwd (in 24 vv) and H5414 nâthan (in 1817 vv). The Verifier's own computed tier for this pair is structural / thematic; hôd is rare but the shared construction is an idiom of investiture, not a quotation.

Majesty as God's own clothing structural / thematic: confirmed

The same rare hôd that YHWH places on Solomon is what YHWH wears. Psalm 104:1 joins the noun to the very root used of Solomon here, גָּדַל (H1431), and Psalm 111:3 uses it of the LORD's work. ⚙ The Chronicler's grammar therefore does something careful that the English hides: God magnifies (Piel) the king with the splendour that properly describes God. The king's glory in v. 25 is loaned, and the two psalms are the register from which it is loaned. No commentator in this unit's brief makes the connection; the lexical basis is the Verifier's, the reading is ours.

Psalm 104:1 · Psalm 111:3

basis: Verifier: Psalm 104:1 shares H1431 gâdal (in 115 vv) and H1935 hôwd (in 24 vv); Psalm 111:3 shares H1935 hôwd (in 24 vv). Shared vocabulary of divine splendour, with no quotation in either direction.

A priest who sits on the throne structural / thematic: confirmed

Two things happen in this unit that the Law kept apart: a king is enthroned on a seat called YHWH's (v. 23), and a priest is anointed in the same act as the king (v. 22). Zechariah 6:13 is the passage where the two converge in one man, and the Verifier's pair check on 29:23 returns כִּסֵּא (H3678) and יָשַׁב (H3427) as shared, while the unit-level candidate list adds the rare hôd that Zechariah's crowned figure bears. ⚙ Chronicles keeps the offices in two men, Solomon and Zadok, joined only by one verb. Zechariah expects them in one. Ellicott sees the Chronicler's point exactly, "The king was Jehovah's vicegerent, as Zadok was His priest," and it is the seam between those two clauses that Zechariah's oracle closes.

Zechariah 6:13

basis: Verifier pair (1 Chronicles 29:23 / Zechariah 6:13): shared H3678 kiççêʼ (in 124 vv), H3427 yâshab (in 973 vv); unit candidate list also records H1935 hôwd (in 24 vv). Shared enthronement vocabulary and a shared king-and-priest pattern; no quotation is claimed.

Bulls, rams and their drink offerings: the prescribed pattern structural / thematic: confirmed

The triple offering of v. 21 with נִסְכֵּיהֶם (H5262, "their libations") is not improvised. Numbers 28:14 and Leviticus 23:18 are the statutes that fix which drink offering accompanies which animal, and Numbers 7:88 records the same bull, ram and lamb inventory at the dedication of the tabernacle. Barnes states the rule this verse is obeying: the drink-offerings "appropriate to each kind of burnt-offering, and required by the Law to accompany them." Ellicott cites Exodus 29:40 and Leviticus 23:13 for the same point, and Geneva glosses the libation as "all kinds of liquor which they mingled with their sacrifices, as wine, oil, etc." ⚙ The thousandfold scale is David's; the pattern is Moses'.

Numbers 28:14 · Leviticus 23:18 · Numbers 7:88

basis: Verifier: Numbers 28:14 and Leviticus 23:18 each share H352 ʼayil (in 170 vv), H5262 neçek (in 62 vv), H6499 par (in 119 vv); Numbers 7:88 shares H2077 zebach (in 153 vv), H352 ʼayil (in 170 vv), H6499 par (in 119 vv). All common cultic lexemes, so the link is a shared prescribed pattern rather than a citation.

The same abundance, refused structural / thematic: confirmed

Isaiah 1:11 has the same three words as this verse: zebach (H2077), ʼayil (H352) and rôb (H7230), abundance. There the LORD asks what the multitude of their sacrifices is to him and declares that he has had enough of burnt offerings, rams among them. ⚙ The Verifier records the shared vocabulary; the judgment is ours, and it is a warning, not a verdict on this unit. Chronicles gives no hint that the thousand bulls of 29:21 were unwelcome; the Chronicler frames them as the seal of a confession already made in word (K&D). But the identical vocabulary of abundance is why the Chronicler's insistence on שִׂמְחָה גְדוֹלָה and on offerings given to YHWH matters: the same inventory can be either.

Isaiah 1:11

basis: Verifier: shared H2077 zebach (in 153 vv), H352 ʼayil (in 170 vv), H7230 rôb (in 142 vv). Common lexemes in a shared motif of sacrificial abundance, read here as contrast; no quotation and no dependence is claimed in either direction.

Do "all the sons of David" mean Adonijah? flagged: verify source

The emphatic וְגַם before "all the sons of King David" has been read for centuries as a glance at the defeated claimant. Cambridge: "The Chronicler glances at the submission of Adonijah (1 Kings 1:53)." Ellicott agrees that "The whole sentence may contain an allusive reference to the attempt of Adonijah." K&D flatly denies it: "There can hardly, however, be in these last words a reference to the frustrating of Adonijah's attempted usurpation of the throne." ⚙ We flag this rather than affirm it. No shared-lexeme basis exists (the Verifier returned no candidate for 1 Kings 1:53), the Chronicler never names Adonijah anywhere in this unit, and the sources in this brief are in open disagreement. Benson's more cautious version, that the elder sons "might think themselves wronged by his advancement," is what the verse itself supports.

1 Kings 1:53 · 1 Kings 1:5

basis: No Verifier-computed lexeme basis for this pair; the link rests entirely on commentators' inference from the emphatic particle וְגַם, and the brief's own sources contradict each other (Cambridge and Ellicott affirm the allusion, K&D denies it). Flagged as contested.

The throne of the LORD and the throne promised to David's son typological

The construct כִּסֵּא יְהוָה of v. 23 is the seat Gabriel's announcement takes up when it promises David's descendant "the throne of his father David" and a kingdom without end (Luke 1:32-33), and which Hebrews 1:8 addresses as God's own throne, forever. ⚙ This is a cross-Testament link, so no shared Strong's number can exist between them: the Hebrew of Chronicles and the Greek of Luke and Hebrews have no lexeme in common to compute. The connection is figural and is held by the sources here: Henry ("Solomon's kingdom typified the kingdom of the Messiah, whose throne is the throne of the Lord"), Geneva (the kings of Judah "were figures of Christ"), Poole ("the throne of Christ the Lord, whose vicegerents David, and Solomon, and their successors were"), and Barnes and JFB by way of God's promise to establish it.

Luke 1:32-33 · Hebrews 1:8 · 1 Chronicles 28:5

basis: Cross-Testament (Hebrew to Greek), so shared Strong's numbers are impossible by construction and no verbal tier is available. The basis is a figural reading of the phrase "throne of the LORD," attested in this unit's own commentary (Henry, Geneva, Poole, Barnes, JFB) and ancient in the church's reading of the Davidic promise.

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

The seat that was never Solomon's ancient/widely-held

✦ The commentators in this brief converge here without prompting. Henry: "Solomon sat on the throne of the Lord. Solomon's kingdom typified the kingdom of the Messiah, whose throne is the throne of the Lord." Geneva: the kings of Judah "were figures of Christ, who was the true anointed, and to whom God gave the chief government of all things." Poole lists as one of four senses that it is "the throne of Christ the Lord, whose vicegerents David, and Solomon, and their successors were, for whom this throne was reserved." Barnes and JFB reach the same place by the promise and the vicegerency. ⚙ What the Hebrew contributes is the bare construct with no hedge: כִּסֵּא יְהוָה, and a man sitting on it. Every king after him sits on a seat that belongs to another, which is why the Chronicler can write the phrase at all and why it becomes unbearable by the time the dynasty ends. Luke 1:32-33 answers by promising the throne of David to one whose kingdom does not end, and Hebrews 1:8 addresses that throne as God's own. Ellicott's caution belongs here too: vv. 23 to 25 are "anticipative," a summary placed early, which is exactly how the typology works. The reign is described before it is lived.

1 Chronicles 29:23 · 1 Chronicles 28:5 · Luke 1:32-33 · Hebrews 1:8

King and priest anointed by one verb novel

✦ Ellicott reads the syntax of v. 22 as one act with two objects: "anointed him as prince, and Zadoh as priest, to Jehovah," and he draws the theology out, "The king was Jehovah's vicegerent, as Zadok was His priest." K&D supports the grammar, noting the lamed before Zadok is nota accus., as before Solomon. ⚙ The reading we add is that the verse holds the two offices together and still keeps them in two men. One anointing verb, one day, one LORD, two heads: לְנָגִיד and לְכֹהֵן. Israel's law could not put both on one man, and this verse comes as close as the Law allows. Zechariah 6:13 says the quiet thing out loud, a priest who bears the majesty and sits on the throne with the counsel of peace between the two offices, and Hebrews 7 argues the same convergence from Melchizedek. The priest-king hope is ancient; the specific observation that Chronicles binds the two anointings with a single verb, and that hôd links Solomon's investiture to Zechariah's crowned priest, is our own inference and is offered as such.

1 Chronicles 29:22 · Zechariah 6:13 · Hebrews 7:1-3

The last sacrifice David's assembly could offer novel

⚙ A thousand bulls, a thousand rams, a thousand lambs, and the feast that followed, are here for a reason the text states: to seal a confession (K&D) and to feed a nation (Ellicott, Barnes). Both purposes are provisional by design. The ascending offerings go up and are consumed; the thank-offerings are eaten the same day or the next, as the Pulpit Commentary notes from Leviticus 7; and the day after this one, the altar will need more. The Chronicler's own arithmetic of abundance is what Isaiah 1:11 will later turn into an accusation, and what Hebrews 10:11-12 settles by contrasting a priest who stands daily with one who sat down. ⚙ We mark this reading as ours and not the brief's: no commentator here draws the line from 29:21 to Hebrews. What is sourced is the nature of the offerings, their repetition and their scale; the contrast with a single sacrifice and a seated priest is our inference, and it depends on the New Testament's own argument rather than on anything Chronicles says.

1 Chronicles 29:21 · Hebrews 10:11-12 · Isaiah 1:11

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

⚙ Text and translation. The base text is the BSB with the Berean interlinear and Strong's numbering as supplied in this unit's brief; the Hebrew surface forms, parsings and lexeme identifications above are taken from it and not re-derived. Two places where the interlinear's word order follows the English rather than the Hebrew have been re-ordered in the literal renderings (notably 29:25, where the Hebrew begins with the verb wayḡaddêl, and 29:21, where לַיהוָה appears twice, at word 6 and word 8, and the English prints it once).

⚙ What is genuinely uncertain in this unit, stated plainly. First, the chronology. Poole sets out at length two incompatible readings of "the second time," one placing the anointing after David's death and one during his life, and concludes only that the second "the text seems most to favour"; his own objection, that Zadok's anointing fits badly before Abiathar's removal, he calls "a difficulty, but not insoluble." Ellicott, Barnes, JFB, Cambridge, the Pulpit Commentary and Benson each propose a different accommodation. This synthesis does not decide it and has not smoothed it over. Second, Zadok. The anointing of a priest here is, in Ellicott's words, "peculiar to the Chronicles," and the brief's sources disagree about whether it was a first anointing, a re-anointing, or the settling of a reversion. Third, the homage gesture of 29:24. Ellicott states that the phrase "put hand under" occurs nowhere else in the Hebrew Bible; JFB explains it from a nineteenth-century Eastern custom; Poole and Benson from the oath of Genesis 24:2; K&D rejects both and reduces it to the hand as a symbol of power. We have followed K&D as the least speculative and have left the disagreement visible. Fourth, the final clause of 29:25, where Cambridge's grammatical solution (comparison, not priority in time) and the temporal reading of K&D and the Pulpit Commentary are both permitted by the Hebrew.

⚙ Thread bases. Every verbal basis cited in the badges is a Verifier-computed shared Strong's lexeme with its canonical frequency, quoted as computed. Two pairs (Numbers 27:20 and Zechariah 6:13) were re-checked individually with the Verifier, which returned a structural / thematic tier for both, and we have not upgraded either. No thread in this unit is tiered verbal: the shared lexemes are common cultic and royal vocabulary or proper names, and Chronicles quotes no other text here. The Adonijah thread is flagged because its only basis is a commentators' inference over which the brief's own sources openly disagree. The Luke and Hebrews thread is typological by necessity, since a Hebrew text and a Greek text share no Strong's numbers.

⚙ Provenance of readings. Where a claim is ✦ it is a verbatim excerpt from the named public-domain commentator, resolved from the brief's raw text and not retyped. Where a claim is ⚙ it is this tool's own fallible synthesis, including the whole sola reading, the ascent-and-descent pattern traced through the unit, the observation about the change of grammatical subject at 29:25, and the third christological entry. Gill's identification of the altar with the threshingfloor of Araunah is his inference from 1 Chronicles 21, flagged as such in the note where it appears. No commentator quoted here has been paraphrased, modernized or stitched together, and no Scripture has been quoted beyond the BSB text and the references supplied by the brief.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)