The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

1 Chronicles7:6–12

The Descendants of Benjamin

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

1 Chronicles 7:6–12 — The Descendants of Benjamin. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

6

The three sons of Benjamin: Bela, Becher, and Jediael.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

šə·lō·šāh bin·yā·min be·la‘ wā·ḇe·ḵer wî·ḏî·‘ă·’êl

Word by word5 · parsed
שְׁלֹשָֽׁה׃šə·lō·šāhThe threeH7969
√ shâlôwsh — threeNumbermasculine singular
shâlôwsh: three A bare numeral, but the load-bearing word of the verse. It is the Chronicler's count, and it agrees with none of the parallel rolls: ten in Genesis 46:21, five in 1 Chronicles 8:1, seven families in Numbers 26:38-41. Benson and Poole offer the same two explanations, that these three were the most eminent or that the other houses had gone extinct; Barnes and JFB add war losses. Scripture here preserves a number the reader must hold alongside other numbers.
בִּנְיָמִ֗ןbin·yā·min[sons] of BenjaminH1144
√ Binyâmîyn — Binjamin, youngest son of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
Binyâmîyn: Benjamin, youngest son of Jacob The tribal head named without the construct bnê that grammar demands. Both Ellicott and Cambridge account for the gap by haplography, the scribe's eye skipping from one bn to the next. This is one of the plainest places in Chronicles where the received text shows its own seam, and the translators mark it with brackets rather than paper over it.
בֶּ֧לַעbe·la‘BelaH1106
√ Belaʻ — Bela, the name of a place, also of an Edomite and of two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
Belaʻ: Bela, the name of a place, also of an Edomite and of two Israelites A rare name (14 verses in the canon) that is also Edomite: Bela son of Beor was the first king of Edom. Bela is the one son who holds his place in every Benjamite list, Genesis, Numbers, and both Chronicles registers; he is the fixed point around which the variants turn.
וָבֶ֛כֶרwā·ḇe·ḵerBecherH1071
√ Beker — Beker, the name of two IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
Beker: Beker, the name of two Israelites Rare (4 verses). Barnes conjectures that Becher, or his heir, married an Ephraimite heiress, so that his house passed into Ephraim and appears as the Bachrites of Numbers 26:35, retaining his place here only "by right of blood." K&D reject the idea that his name simply dropped out of Numbers and argue instead that his descendants were too few to form a clan then and multiplied later. Two careful readings, one text, no way to settle it from the verse.
וִידִֽיעֲאֵ֖לwî·ḏî·‘ă·’êland JediaelH3043
√ Yᵉdîyʻăʼêl — Jediael, the name of three IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉdîyʻăʼêl: Jediael, the name of three Israelites Rare (6 verses). Cambridge reads the name, "Known to God," as a deliberate replacement for the heathen-sounding Ashbel, and says the Chronicler here conforms to Hosea 2:17, where the names of the Baals are taken out of Israel's mouth. K&D agree the identification with Ashbel is "very probable" but refuse to call it certain; Barnes suspects a later chieftain whose "son" means only descendant. The name is where the unit's whole question sits: a register is also an act of naming, and naming is an act of allegiance.
7

The sons of Bela: Ezbon, Uzzi, Uzziel, Jerimoth, and Iri, heads of their families—five in all. There were 22,034 mighty men of valor listed in their genealogies.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ū·ḇə·nê ḇe·la‘ ’eṣ·bō·wn wə·‘uz·zî wə·‘uz·zî·’êl wî·rî·mō·wṯ wə·‘î·rî rā·šê ’ā·ḇō·wṯ bêṯ ḥă·miš·šāh ‘eś·rîm ū·šə·na·yim ’e·lep̄ ū·šə·lō·šîm wə·’ar·bā·‘āh gib·bō·w·rê ḥă·yā·lîm wə·hiṯ·yaḥ·śām

Word by word19 · parsed
וּבְנֵ֣יū·ḇə·nêThe sonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural construct
bên: a son, in the widest sense including grandson, subject, nation The lexicon itself warns that bên is elastic. Benson, Poole, Barnes and K&D all apply that elasticity here: comparing 1 Chronicles 8:3, these are probably not Bela's immediate sons but later descendants who were heads of households when the register was drawn. Poole adds the human detail that the intervening fathers are omitted "because they were obscure persons."
בֶ֗לַעḇe·la‘of BelaH1106
√ Belaʻ — Bela, the name of a place, also of an Edomite and of two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
אֶצְבּ֡וֹן’eṣ·bō·wnEzbonH675
√ ʼEtsbôwn — Etsbon, the name of two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וְעֻזִּ֡יwə·‘uz·zîUzziH5813
√ ʻUzzîy — Uzzi, the name of six IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וְ֠עֻזִּיאֵלwə·‘uz·zî·’êlUzzielH5816
√ ʻUzzîyʼêl — Uzziel, the name of six IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וִירִימ֨וֹתwî·rî·mō·wṯJerimothH3406
√ Yᵉrîymôwth — Jerimoth or Jeremoth, the name of twelve IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וְעִירִ֜יwə·‘î·rîand IriH5901
√ ʻÎyrîy — Iri, an IsraeliteConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
רָאשֵׁי֙rā·šêheadsH7218
√ rôʼsh — the head (as most easily shaken), whether literal or figurative (in many applications, of place, time, rank, itcNounmasculine plural construct
rôʼsh: the head, whether literal or figurative, of place, time, rank The organising word of the whole unit, used at vv. 7, 9 and 11. A rôʼsh bêṯ ʼāḇôṯ is the responsible man of a household group, the one the muster roll names on behalf of everyone behind him. Ellicott's "chieftains" is right; this is the structure by which a tribe could be counted and called out at all.
אָב֔וֹת’ā·ḇō·wṯof their familiesH1
√ ʼâb — father, in a literal and immediate, or figurative and remote applicationNounmasculine plural
ʼâb: father, literal and immediate, or figurative and remote In the phrase bêṯ ʼāḇôṯ the plural is deliberately remote: not "their fathers" but "the fathers," the ancestral houses as institutions that outlive any one man.
בֵּ֣יתbêṯ. . .H1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcNounmasculine singular construct
bayith: a house, especially family Untranslated in the English line (the interlinear marks it with dots) because "house of fathers" collapses into "families."
חֲמִשָּׁ֗הḥă·miš·šāhfive [in all]H2568
√ châmêsh — fiveNumbermasculine singular
châmêsh: five The tally of Bela's heads. JFB contrasts it with Numbers 26:38, where seven great Benjamite families stand, five from Benjamin's own sons and two from Bela's, and concludes that war or time had reshaped the tribe.
עֶשְׂרִ֤ים‘eś·rîmThere were 22,034H6242
√ ʻesrîym — twentyNumbercommon plural
וּשְׁנַ֙יִם֙ū·šə·na·yim. . .H8147
√ shᵉnayim — twoConjunctive wawNumbermd
אֶ֔לֶף’e·lep̄. . .H505
√ ʼeleph — hence (the ox's head being the first letter of the alphabet, and this eventually used as a numeral) a thousandNumbermasculine singular
וּשְׁלֹשִׁ֖יםū·šə·lō·šîm. . .H7970
√ shᵉlôwshîym — thirtyConjunctive wawNumbercommon plural
וְאַרְבָּעָֽה׃סwə·’ar·bā·‘āh. . .H702
√ ʼarbaʻ — fourConjunctive wawNumbermasculine singular
גִּבּוֹרֵ֖יgib·bō·w·rêmighty menH1368
√ gibbôwr — powerfulAdjectivemasculine plural construct
gibbôwr: powerful Not a compliment but a classification. In a muster roll gibbôrê ḥăyālîm marks the men who can be fielded; the genealogy is also a war office document.
חֲיָלִ֑יםḥă·yā·lîmof valorH2428
√ chayil — probably a force, whether of men, means or other resourcesNounmasculine plural
chayil: probably a force, whether of men, means or other resources The lexicon's breadth matters: chayil covers strength, wealth, an army, and moral worth (the ʼêšeṯ chayil of Proverbs 31:10). Here it is manpower, and the plural ḥăyālîm stacked under gibbôrê makes a set phrase.
וְהִתְיַחְשָׂ֗םwə·hiṯ·yaḥ·śāmlisted in their genealogiesH3187
√ yâchas — to enroll by pedigreeConjunctive wawVerbHitpaelInfinitive constructthird person masculine plural
yâchas: to enroll by pedigree (Hitpael) The verb exists in the Hebrew Bible almost only in this reflexive stem and almost only in Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah. It is the technical act on which the post-exilic community turned: Ezra 2:62 and Nehemiah 7:64 record priests who could not find their entry and were put out of the priesthood. To be enrolled is to have a place; the Chronicler is writing for readers who know what it costs to lose one.
8

The sons of Becher: Zemirah, Joash, Eliezer, Elioenai, Omri, Jeremoth, Abijah, Anathoth, and Alemeth; all these were Becher’s sons.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ū·ḇə·nê ḇe·ḵer zə·mî·rāh wə·yō·w·‘āš we·’ĕ·lî·‘e·zer wə·’el·yō·w·‘ê·nay wə·‘ā·mə·rî wî·rê·mō·wṯ wa·’ă·ḇî·yāh wa·‘ă·nā·ṯō·wṯ wə·‘ā·lā·meṯ kāl- ’êl·leh ḇā·ḵer bə·nê-

Word by word15 · parsed
וּבְנֵ֣יū·ḇə·nêThe sonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural construct
בֶ֗כֶרḇe·ḵerof BecherH1071
√ Beker — Beker, the name of two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
Beker: Beker, the name of two Israelites Becher's nine houses are recorded nowhere else in Scripture. Ellicott notes they might have been known as "sons of the firstborn," given the vowel ambiguity of the name, and flatly states "They are nowhere else recorded." A whole branch of Benjamin survives on this verse alone.
זְמִירָ֡הzə·mî·rāhZemirahH2160
√ Zᵉmîyrâh — Zemirah, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
וְיוֹעָ֡שׁwə·yō·w·‘āšJoashH3135
√ Yôwʻâsh — Joash, the name of two IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וֶ֠אֱלִיעֶזֶרwe·’ĕ·lî·‘e·zerEliezerH461
√ ʼĔlîyʻezer — Eliezer, the name of a Damascene and of ten IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וְאֶלְיוֹעֵינַ֤יwə·’el·yō·w·‘ê·nayElioenaiH454
√ ʼElyᵉhôwʻêynay — Eljehoenai or Eljoenai, the name of seven IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וְעָמְרִי֙wə·‘ā·mə·rîOmriH6018
√ ʻOmrîy — Omri, an IsraeliteConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וִירֵמ֣וֹתwî·rê·mō·wṯJeremothH3406
√ Yᵉrîymôwth — Jerimoth or Jeremoth, the name of twelve IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וַאֲבִיָּ֔הwa·’ă·ḇî·yāhAbijahH29
√ ʼĂbîyâh — Abijah, the name of several Israelite men and two IsraelitessesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וַעֲנָת֖וֹתwa·‘ă·nā·ṯō·wṯAnathothH6068
√ ʻĂnâthôwth — Anathoth, the name of two Israelites, also of a place in PalConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
ʻĂnâthôwth: Anathoth, the name of two Israelites, also of a place Ellicott and Cambridge take Anathoth and Alemeth as Levitical towns of Benjamin (1 Chronicles 6:60); K&D generalise the principle, that the cities "received their names from the heads of the families which inhabited them." If they are right, this dry name is the origin point of the village where Jeremiah was born and where he later bought a field as a sign that Judah would return (Jeremiah 32:7-9).
וְעָלָ֑מֶתwə·‘ā·lā·meṯand AlemethH5964
√ ʻÂlemeth — Alemeth, the name of a place in Palestine and of two IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
ʻÂlemeth: Alemeth, the name of a place in Palestine and of two Israelites Rare (4 verses). It recurs in the Benjamite line of Saul at 1 Chronicles 8:36 and 9:42, which is one small sign that the Chronicler's Benjamite sources overlap even where their lists differ.
כָּל־kāl-allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
אֵ֖לֶּה’êl·lehtheseH428
√ ʼêl-leh — these or thosePronouncommon plural
ʼêl-leh: these or those The demonstrative that closes a sub-list. It carries no weight of its own here beyond binding the nine names into one house.
בָֽכֶר׃ḇā·ḵerwere Becher’sH1071
√ Beker — Beker, the name of two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
Beker: Beker The repetition of the father's name at the end of his sons' list is the register's way of ruling a line under the entry.
בְּנֵי־bə·nê-sonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural construct
9

Their genealogies were recorded according to the heads of their families—20,200 mighty men of valor.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

lə·ṯō·lə·ḏō·w·ṯām wə·hiṯ·yaḥ·śām rā·šê ’ă·ḇō·w·ṯām bêṯ ‘eś·rîm ’e·lep̄ ū·mā·ṯā·yim gib·bō·w·rê ḥā·yil

Word by word10 · parsed
לְתֹלְדוֹתָ֗םlə·ṯō·lə·ḏō·w·ṯāmTheir genealogiesH8435
√ tôwlᵉdâh — (plural only) descent, iPreposition-lNounfeminine plural constructthird person masculine plural
tôwlᵉdâh: (plural only) descent, generations The word is plural by nature: no one has a single tôlᵉdâh. It is the structural spine of Genesis and it reappears here as an administrative standard, which is the Chronicler's whole method: the promise-shaped word of Genesis put to work as a register.
וְהִתְיַחְשָׂ֣םwə·hiṯ·yaḥ·śāmwere recordedH3187
√ yâchas — to enroll by pedigreeConjunctive wawVerbHitpaelInfinitive constructthird person masculine plural
yâchas: to enroll by pedigree (Hitpael) Second occurrence in three verses, the repetition marking the seam between Bela's house and Becher's. K&D read rāʼšê bêṯ ʼăḇôṯām as standing in apposition to lᵉṯōlᵉḏôṯām, explaining it: the generations in question are the birth lists of the household heads.
רָאשֵׁי֙rā·šêaccording to the headsH7218
√ rôʼsh — the head (as most easily shaken), whether literal or figurative (in many applications, of place, time, rank, itcNounmasculine plural construct
אֲבוֹתָ֔ם’ă·ḇō·w·ṯāmof their familiesH1
√ ʼâb — father, in a literal and immediate, or figurative and remote applicationNounmasculine plural constructthird person masculine plural
בֵּ֣יתbêṯ. . .H1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcNounmasculine singular construct
עֶשְׂרִ֥ים‘eś·rîm20,200H6242
√ ʻesrîym — twentyNumbercommon plural
ʻesrîym: twenty With ʼeleph and mêʼâh, the figure 20,200.
אֶ֖לֶף’e·lep̄. . .H505
√ ʼeleph — hence (the ox's head being the first letter of the alphabet, and this eventually used as a numeral) a thousandNumbermasculine singular
ʼeleph: a thousand The lexicon preserves the word's origin in the ox head that begins the alphabet. In muster contexts ʼeleph can also denote a clan or contingent rather than a literal thousand, which is one honest reason the large totals of Chronicles are debated; the brief supplies no ruling on that, and neither do we.
וּמָאתָֽיִם׃סū·mā·ṯā·yim. . .H3967
√ mêʼâh — a hundredConjunctive wawNumberfd
גִּבּוֹרֵ֖יgib·bō·w·rêmighty menH1368
√ gibbôwr — powerfulAdjectivemasculine plural construct
gibbôwr: powerful Becher's 20,200 fighting men are the fact K&D use against the theory that his name simply fell out of Numbers 26: a house that fields twenty thousand men is not a house the Mosaic register would have overlooked, so they conclude its growth came later.
חָ֑יִלḥā·yilof valorH2428
√ chayil — probably a force, whether of men, means or other resourcesNounmasculine singular
10

The son of Jediael: Bilhan. The sons of Bilhan: Jeush, Benjamin, Ehud, Chenaanah, Zethan, Tarshish, and Ahishahar.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ū·ḇə·nê yə·ḏî·‘ă·’êl bil·hān ū·ḇə·nê ḇil·hān yə·ʿīš ū·ḇin·yā·min wə·’ê·hūḏ ū·ḵə·na·‘ă·nāh wə·zê·ṯān wə·ṯar·šîš wa·’ă·ḥî·šā·ḥar

Word by word12 · parsed
וּבְנֵ֥יū·ḇə·nêThe sonH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural construct
יְדִיעֲאֵ֖לyə·ḏî·‘ă·’êlof JediaelH3043
√ Yᵉdîyʻăʼêl — Jediael, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
בִּלְהָ֑ןbil·hānBilhanH1092
√ Bilhân — Bilhan, the name of an Edomite and of an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
Bilhân: Bilhan, the name of an Edomite and of an Israelite Rare (3 verses). The other two occurrences, 1 Chronicles 1:42 and Genesis 36:27, are both Edomite, a son of Seir the Horite. Ellicott draws the conclusion carefully: "Perhaps an Edomite element in Benjamin," and points to Caleb the Kenizzite as the comparable case. Pulpit says the same of Jeush and Bela. If they are right, Israel's registers are less racially tidy than they look, and the Chronicler shows no embarrassment about it.
וּבְנֵ֣יū·ḇə·nêThe sonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural construct
בִלְהָ֗ןḇil·hānof BilhanH1092
√ Bilhân — Bilhan, the name of an Edomite and of an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
יְעִישׁyə·ʿīšJeushH3266
√ Yᵉʻûwsh — Jeush, the name of an Edomite and of four IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉʻûwsh: Jeush, the name of an Edomite and of four Israelites The written form in the Hebrew text differs from the read form; Ellicott records "So Heb., margin. Text, Jeish," and notes Jeush is also a son of Esau at 1 Chronicles 1:35. A small Ketiv and Qere variation preserved rather than smoothed away.
וּ֠בִנְיָמִןū·ḇin·yā·minBenjaminH1144
√ Binyâmîyn — Binjamin, youngest son of JacobConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
Binyâmîyn: Benjamin, youngest son of Jacob A descendant carrying the tribal name within the tribal list. Whatever else a genealogy does, it shows a people naming children after the man they came from, which is how a tribe keeps its own memory alive without a written archive.
וְאֵה֤וּדwə·’ê·hūḏEhudH164
√ ʼÊhûwd — Ehud, the name of two or three IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וּֽכְנַעֲנָה֙ū·ḵə·na·‘ă·nāhChenaanahH3668
√ Kᵉnaʻănâh — Kenaanah, the name of two IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
Kᵉnaʻănâh: Kenaanah, the name of two Israelites The form is the feminine of Canaan. Ellicott suggests "perhaps a Canaanite house which had amalgamated with the bnê Jediael"; K&D answer that the name "does not necessarily indicate a Canaanite family." We record both and settle neither.
וְזֵיתָ֔ןwə·zê·ṯānZethanH2133
√ Zêythân — Zethan, an IsraeliteConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וְתַרְשִׁ֖ישׁwə·ṯar·šîšTarshishH8659
√ Tarshîysh — Tarshish, a place on the Mediterranean, hence, the ephithet of a merchant vessel (as if for or from that port)Conjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וַאֲחִישָֽׁחַר׃wa·’ă·ḥî·šā·ḥarand AhishaharH300
√ ʼĂchîyshachar — Achishachar, an IsraeliteConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
ʼĂchîyshachar: Achishachar, an Israelite Ellicott and K&D agree on the sense, Ellicott glossing it "Brother of dawn" and K&D "Brother of the Dawn". K&D suggest the child was born toward daybreak; Ellicott compares Shaharaim (1 Chronicles 8:8) and the ben-shahar, son of the dawn, of Isaiah 14:12. The English transliteration keeps none of it.
11

All these sons of Jediael were heads of their families, mighty men of valor; there were 17,200 fit for battle.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

kāl- ’êl·leh bə·nê yə·ḏî·‘ă·’êl lə·rā·šê hā·’ā·ḇō·wṯ gib·bō·w·rê ḥă·yā·lîm šiḇ·‘āh- ‘ā·śār ’e·lep̄ ū·mā·ṯa·yim yō·ṣə·’ê ṣā·ḇā lam·mil·ḥā·māh

Word by word15 · parsed
כָּל־kāl-AllH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
אֵ֜לֶּה’êl·lehtheseH428
√ ʼêl-leh — these or thosePronouncommon plural
בְּנֵ֤יbə·nêsonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural construct
יְדִֽיעֲאֵל֙yə·ḏî·‘ă·’êlof JediaelH3043
√ Yᵉdîyʻăʼêl — Jediael, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉdîyʻăʼêl: Jediael The third house is closed with the same formula that closed the first two, and the sum of the three (22,034 + 20,200 + 17,200) is 59,434. Cambridge and K&D both give that figure; Ellicott prints 54,434 and Gill 59,430. The numbers on the page do not all agree, and we have not silently harmonised them.
לְרָאשֵׁ֣יlə·rā·šê[were] headsH7218
√ rôʼsh — the head (as most easily shaken), whether literal or figurative (in many applications, of place, time, rank, itcPreposition-lNounmasculine plural construct
הָאָב֔וֹתhā·’ā·ḇō·wṯof their familiesH1
√ ʼâb — father, in a literal and immediate, or figurative and remote applicationArticleNounmasculine plural
גִּבּוֹרֵ֖יgib·bō·w·rêmighty menH1368
√ gibbôwr — powerfulAdjectivemasculine plural construct
gibbôwr: powerful Third and final use of the muster formula in this unit, which is the point of the whole pericope: three genealogical sections, each ending in a count of men who can fight.
חֲיָלִ֑יםḥă·yā·lîmof valorH2428
√ chayil — probably a force, whether of men, means or other resourcesNounmasculine plural
שִׁבְעָֽה־šiḇ·‘āh-there were 17,200H7651
√ shebaʻ — seven (as the sacred full one)Numbermasculine singular
עָשָׂ֥ר‘ā·śār. . .H6240
√ ʻâsâr — ten (only in combination), iNumbermasculine singular
אֶ֙לֶף֙’e·lep̄. . .H505
√ ʼeleph — hence (the ox's head being the first letter of the alphabet, and this eventually used as a numeral) a thousandNumbermasculine singular
וּמָאתַ֔יִםū·mā·ṯa·yim. . .H3967
√ mêʼâh — a hundredConjunctive wawNumberfd
יֹצְאֵ֥יyō·ṣə·’êfitH3318
√ yâtsâʼ — to go (causatively, bring) out, in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively, direct and proximVerbQalParticiplemasculine plural construct
yâtsâʼ: to go out, bring out, in a great variety of applications The common verb of leaving, and the covenant verb of the exodus, here in the military idiom yōṣᵉʼê ṣāḇāʼ, those who go out with the host. Numbers 1:3 uses the same idiom for everyone in Israel "able to go forth to war," which is the register this one is measured against.
צָבָ֖אṣā·ḇāfor battleH6635
√ tsâbâʼ — a mass of persons (or figuratively, things), especially regNouncommon singular
tsâbâʼ: a mass of persons, especially regimented for war The word behind "LORD of hosts." Here it is the ordinary human army; the same noun elsewhere names the armies of heaven and the stars. A Benjamite levy is being counted with the vocabulary Scripture also uses for the armies God himself commands.
לַמִּלְחָמָֽה׃lam·mil·ḥā·māh. . .H4421
√ milchâmâh — a battle (iPreposition-l, ArticleNounfeminine singular
milchâmâh: a battle Definite, lam·mil·ḥā·māh, "to the battle," with article: not war in the abstract but the fighting these men were liable for. Ellicott and Cambridge both look back from here to Judges 20:47, where the tribe was reduced to six hundred men; the register is the measure of a recovery.
12

The Shuppites and Huppites were descendants of Ir, and the Hushites were descendants of Aher.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·šup·pim wə·ḥup·pim bə·nê ‘îr ḥu·šim bə·nê ’a·ḥêr

Word by word7 · parsed
וְשֻׁפִּ֤םwə·šup·pimThe ShuppitesH8206
√ Shuppîym — Shuppim, an IsraeliteConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
Shuppîym: Shuppim, an Israelite A rare lexeme (3 verses). Ellicott traces the same house through four spellings: Muppim in Genesis 46:21, Shephupham in Numbers 26:39, Shephuphan in 1 Chronicles 8:5, Shuppim here, and calls Muppim "a mere slip of the pen." K&D reach the same conclusion by a different route and also warn that the Shuppim of 1 Chronicles 7:15 belongs to Manasseh, so the two must not be merged.
וְחֻפִּם֙wə·ḥup·pimand HuppitesH2650
√ Chuppîym — Chuppim, an IsraeliteConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
Chuppîym: Chuppim, an Israelite The second rare lexeme of the verse (3 verses), and the two never appear apart: Muppim and Huppim at Genesis 46:21, Shupham and Hupham at Numbers 26:39, Shephuphan and Huram at 1 Chronicles 8:5. Ellicott calls Shupham and Hupham "quite natural variants of Shuppim and Huppim" and derives the Shuphami and Huphami clans of Numbers 26 from them. This pair is the firmest tie between the appendix in v. 12 and the family that went down into Egypt, and it is also the pair K&D warn is easily confused with the Manassite names of v. 15.
בְּנֵ֣יbə·nêwere descendantsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural construct
bên: a son, in the widest sense Ellicott's defence of the verse turns on this word's range: Shuppim and Huppim are called sons of Benjamin in Genesis, sons of Bela in 1 Chronicles 8, and sons of Ir here, and he answers that there is "no more contradiction here than there would be in calling the same person a son of David, son of Judah, and son of Abraham." Pulpit disagrees and calls the descent as stated "a thing impossible."
עִ֔יר‘îrof IrH5893
√ ʻÎyr — Ir, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
חֻשִׁ֖םḥu·šimand the HushitesH2366
√ Chûwshîym — Chushim, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
Chûwshîym: Chushim, the name of three Israelites Hushim is Dan's only son in Genesis 46:23, a Benjamite clan at 1 Chronicles 8:8 and 8:11, and in that second passage a woman. K&D therefore refuse to connect this Hushim with Dan at all.
בְּנֵ֥יbə·nêwere descendantsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural construct
אַחֵֽר׃’a·ḥêrof AherH313
√ ʼAchêr — Acher, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
ʼAchêr: Acher, an Israelite The unit ends on its hardest word. K&D say outright that this verse "is unintelligible to us" and call the clause "utterly enigmatical." Poole, JFB, Cambridge and Ellicott all canvass the reading "sons of another," a covert reference to Dan, whose name is missing from this chapter; Poole reports the rabbinic usage in which "another thing" names something too loathsome to say. Ellicott lists three considerations against it, including that Zebulun is missing too, and Gill concludes Hushim "rather seems to belong to Benjamin." We leave it where the commentators leave it: unresolved, and worth the reader's attention precisely because it is.

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. The line with a hole in it — 7:6

The unit begins with a defect. Hebrew v. 6 opens בִּנְיָמִ֗ן with no construct bnê before it, and Ellicott says why: the word "has been lost, because Benjamin in Hebrew begins with the same three letters." Cambridge calls it an error of transcription. BSB brackets the supplied "[sons]" and lets the reader see the seam. ⚙ It is worth stopping there before the names begin. This is a book about keeping records, and its Benjamite record opens with a scribe's eye slipping. The Chronicler does not repair it. Three sons are then counted where Genesis 46:21 has ten and 1 Chronicles 8:1 five; Benson and Poole give the same pair of explanations, that these were "most eminent" or that "the other families were now extinct," and JFB add the wars of Judges 20. Barnes goes further and calls Jediael "perhaps a later chieftain," so that "son" would mean only descendant. Ellicott's own summary of the method is the sharpest line in the brief: the chronicler "has faithfully followed or rather transcribed his sources, without a thought of harmonising their apparent inconsistencies."

ii. Known to God, not to Baal — 7:6

Cambridge makes the unit's one openly theological claim: the three names come from Genesis 46:21, with Jediael, "Known to God," substituted for the name Cambridge calls heathen-sounding, Ashbel, which he equates with Ishbaal, Man of Baal, and "The Chronicler in this case conforms literally to the principle laid down in Hosea 2:17," where the names of the Baals are taken out of Israel's mouth. K&D, working only from the lists, call the identification with Ashbel "very probable" but refuse certainty; Geneva simply glosses Jediael as "Also called Ashbel." ⚙ Two things should be said honestly. The identification is well attested across the commentators. The motive is Cambridge's reconstruction: no verse says the Chronicler renamed anyone. But if Cambridge is right, this genealogy is doing something more than bookkeeping. It is refusing to let a Baal name stand in Israel's register, and replacing it with a name that says the man's security lies in being known by God rather than in being known by anyone.

iii. Three houses, three musters — 7:7-7:11

The body of the pericope is a formula run three times: names, a tally, וְהִתְיַחְשָׂם (Hitpael of yâchas, to have oneself enrolled by pedigree), and a count of גִּבּוֹרֵי חֲיָלִים. K&D refuse to read the five "sons of Bela" as literal sons: they are "more distant descendants, who, at the time when this register was made up, were heads of the five groups of related households." Benson, Poole and Barnes agree, and Barnes ties it to a date, "the chief men of the family at the time of David's census." Ellicott says the same of Bela's list and adds that "the names before us represent the chieftains and clans of Bela as they existed at a given epoch." Poole notices the human cost of that compression: the intervening fathers are left out "because they were obscure persons, as their sons are mentioned for their eminency." ⚙ That is a genealogy admitting that it is selective. The arithmetic admits something too. 22,034 plus 20,200 plus 17,200 is 59,434, which Cambridge and K&D both print; Ellicott prints 54,434 and Gill 59,430. K&D use the total as an argument: at Numbers 26:41 all Benjamin numbered 45,600, and Judges 20:47 left the tribe six hundred men, so these figures "point unquestionably to post-Mosaic times." The register is not a snapshot of the patriarchal family. It is the measure of a tribe that was nearly wiped out and came back.

iv. Names that are also places, and a tribe that is not all Israelite — 7:8, 7:10

Becher's nine houses are recorded nowhere else in Scripture; Ellicott says so flatly. Two of the nine, Anathoth and Alemeth, are towns: Ellicott and Cambridge both point to the Levitical towns of 1 Chronicles 6:60, and K&D state the principle, that "the cities received their names from the heads of the families which inhabited them." Gill reports Kimchi to the same effect and names Anathoth "the native place of Jeremiah the prophet." In Jediael's branch the names lean the other way, outward: Ellicott reads Bilhan against 1 Chronicles 1:42, "a son of Seir. Perhaps an Edomite element in Benjamin," and Pulpit says Bilhan, Jeush and Bela are all "of Edomitish origin." Chenaanah is the feminine of Canaan, which Ellicott thinks may mark "a Canaanite house which had amalgamated with the bnê Jediael" and K&D say need not. Tarshish is a Phoenician port and a gem. ⚙ The register that looked like a wall around a bloodline turns out to be full of doors. The Chronicler writes the foreign-sounding names down without a word of apology.

v. Sons of another — 7:12

The last verse has no verb and no agreement among its readers. K&D begin "1 Chronicles 7:12 is unintelligible to us" and call the second clause "utterly enigmatical." The dispute is over אַחֵֽר׃, which Ellicott notes "happens to mean another." JFB report that "some eminent critics" read it as a common noun, "and Hushim, another son," and add the strongest piece of evidence: Hushim is Dan's son at Genesis 46:23, v. 13 here ends "the sons of Bilhah," the mother of Dan and Naphtali, and Dan is never named in the chapter. Poole marshals four arguments for the Dan reading, including the rabbinic idiom in which "another thing" names what is too loathsome to say aloud. Ellicott answers point by point: Numbers 26:42 calls Dan's offspring Shuham, not Hushim; Zebulun is omitted here as well; and "the chronicler's dislike of the tribe of Dan is probably an unfounded supposition." Cambridge takes a quieter line, that a copyist found the word Dan illegible. Gill decides Hushim "rather seems to belong to Benjamin." ⚙ We do not resolve it, and we note that Henry, writing on the chapter as a whole, had already drawn the conclusion the Dan reading makes explicit: "Dan is omitted, Re 7. Men become abominable when they forsake the worship of the true God, for any creature object."

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ This is a fallible reading, offered to be tested against the text. Fifty-nine thousand four hundred and thirty-four men are counted here and not one of them speaks. The pericope has no narrative, no miracle, no oracle. What it has is a procedure: wə·hiṯ·yaḥ·śām, they had themselves enrolled, repeated at the close of each house. The reflexive stem matters. These men came forward and gave their names. Read this chapter next to Ezra 2:62 and Nehemiah 7:64, where men who sought their register and could not find it were put out of the priesthood as unclean, and the dry list turns into something with stakes in it: to be written down is to belong, to be missing is to be excluded. And then read it with the seams left in, as the Chronicler left them. The first word of the Benjamite section has fallen out. The count is three where Genesis says ten. Becher's twenty thousand are nowhere else in Scripture. The last verse may be quietly carrying the tribe whose name the chapter will not say. This is a register that does not work. ⚙ Our reading is that the Chronicler's refusal to fix it is the point he is making. If belonging rested on the accuracy of the document, Benjamin would be in trouble on this page. Cambridge's suggestion about the substituted name sharpens it: the son whose name honoured Baal is entered as Jediael, Known to God. The register may be broken; the knowing is not. Every worry a reader can raise about these lists, that they contradict each other, that a name has dropped out, that a whole tribe is missing, is a worry about whether the record can bear the weight of a person's standing. Chronicles answers by handing us the flawed record and going on counting. We hold this loosely: it is an inference about the Chronicler's purpose, and the text does not state it.

Not Scripture, and not a verse: an editorial line only. The register is damaged and the Chronicler will not repair it, because what secures a name here is being known, not being legible.

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The three names come from Genesis verbal / quotation: confirmed

The Verifier's strongest match for this unit is Genesis 46:21, the seventy who went down into Egypt, where Benjamin's sons are listed ten deep. Bela and Becher stand at the head of that list exactly as they do here, and Cambridge states the relation directly: "These three names come from Genesis 46:21." The third name differs, Ashbel there and Jediael here, which is the whole crux of v. 6. ⚙ The link is textual, not merely thematic: the Chronicler is working from the Genesis roll, and every commentator in the brief, Ellicott, Benson, Barnes, JFB, Poole, Gill, Geneva, Cambridge, Pulpit and K&D alike, reads the two passages against each other.

Genesis 46:21

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H1071 Beker (in 4 vv, rare) and H1106 Belaʻ (in 14 vv, rare), plus H1144 Binyâmîyn (in 160 vv). Two rare proper-name lexemes shared in the same order supports a genuine verbal dependence on the Genesis list; Cambridge names the dependence explicitly. No quotation formula is claimed.

Anathoth and Alemeth: two men who became two towns verbal / quotation: confirmed

Two of Becher's nine sons carry names that are also Benjamite Levitical towns. Ellicott notes that Anathoth and Alameth, as he spells it, "were Levitical towns in Benjamin" and cites 1 Chronicles 6:60; Cambridge cites the same verse and Jeremiah 1:1; K&D generalise the mechanism, that the cities "received their names from the heads of the families which inhabited them." ⚙ If that is right, one entry in this list is the origin of the village where Jeremiah was born, and of the field Jeremiah later bought there as a sign that exiles would come home (Jeremiah 32:7-9). A name in a census became a place on a map became the setting of a prophecy.

1 Chronicles 6:60 · Jeremiah 1:1

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H5964 ʻÂlemeth (in 4 vv, rare) with 1 Chronicles 6:60, alongside H1144 Binyâmîyn and H7969 shâlôwsh. The Jeremiah 1:1 leg has no Verifier-computed shared-lexeme basis in this unit and rests on the named citations of Cambridge, Ellicott and K&D, who all point to Anathoth (H6068).

Shuppim and Huppim, and the trap four verses later flagged: verify source

The Verifier's second-ranked candidate is 1 Chronicles 7:15, which shares both rare names of v. 12. That match is exactly the one K&D warn against: they argue that "the peculiar forms of those names" here "seem to have arisen from an improper comparison of them with" the pair in v. 15, "in which the fact was overlooked that the Huppim and Shuppim of 1 Chronicles 7:15 belong to the Manassites." ⚙ So the lexical link is real and the historical link is probably an error, possibly an ancient one lodged in the text. Ellicott instead traces this house through Genesis 46:21 (Muppim, which he calls "a mere slip of the pen"), Numbers 26:39 (Shephupham and Hupham) and 1 Chronicles 8:5 (Shephuphan and Huram, the last of which he judges to be a scribe's error for Hupham). We flag the pairing rather than assert it.

1 Chronicles 7:15 · Numbers 26:39

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H8206 Shuppîym (in 3 vv) and H2650 Chuppîym (in 3 vv), both rare, with 1 Chronicles 7:15. Flagged because K&D hold that the 7:15 pair are Manassites and that the resemblance may itself be a transmission error, so the shared lexemes do not establish a shared referent. Numbers 26:39 is carried on Ellicott's and Gill's named equation of Shupham and Hupham with these names, not on a Verifier basis.

Jediael: one rare name, several men structural / thematic: confirmed

Jediael occurs in only six verses of the Hebrew Bible, and half of them are David's men: Jediael son of Shimri among the mighty men (1 Chronicles 11:45), the Manassite captain who deserted to David at Ziklag (1 Chronicles 12:20), and Jediael the Korahite gatekeeper (1 Chronicles 26:2). ⚙ These are not the same person as Benjamin's son, and we make no claim that they are. What the shared rare lexeme shows is narrower and still worth seeing: a name meaning "Known to God" clusters in the Chronicler's own material about David's establishment, which is consistent with Cambridge's reading of v. 6, that the Chronicler favours names confessing the God of Israel.

1 Chronicles 11:45 · 1 Chronicles 12:20 · 1 Chronicles 26:2

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H3043 Yᵉdîyʻăʼêl (in 6 vv, rare) with all three references. Deliberately tiered structural rather than verbal because the shared lexeme is a personal name borne by different individuals; the link is onomastic and thematic, not referential.

Becher among the Ephraimites structural / thematic: confirmed

Numbers 26:35 places a Becher and his clan the Bachrites in Ephraim, not Benjamin. Barnes builds a whole reconstruction on it: Becher "or his heir, married an Ephraimite heiress," so his house "passed over in a certain sense into the tribe of Ephraim," retaining a place here "because, by right of blood, he really belonged to Benjamin." Pulpit follows the same line and credits the discussion to Lord A. C. Hervey. K&D reject it and argue instead that Becher's descendants were simply too few to form a clan in Moses' day and multiplied afterwards into the nine houses and 20,200 men of vv. 8 and 9. ⚙ The two accounts cannot both be right, and the verse does not decide between them.

Numbers 26:35 · 1 Chronicles 8:1

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H1071 Beker (in 4 vv, rare) with Numbers 26:35. Tiered structural rather than verbal by deliberate under-claim: the lexeme is genuinely rare and genuinely shared, but whether the Ephraimite Becher is the Benjamite Becher is a conjecture Barnes labels as such and K&D reject. 1 Chronicles 8:1 is named by Benson, Poole, Gill and K&D and carries no computed lexeme basis here.

The tribe that is not named flagged: verify source

Dan is absent from 1 Chronicles 7, and v. 12 is where that absence becomes audible: Hushim is Dan's only son at Genesis 46:23, and the very next verse of this chapter closes with "the sons of Bilhah," Dan's mother. Poole gives four arguments that aher here means "another," a coded Dan; JFB call the coincidence a presumption in favour of that rendering; Cambridge suspects an illegible manuscript; Ellicott gives three counter-considerations, among them that Zebulun is missing too. Henry, on the chapter as a whole, connects the silence to Judges 18 and to Revelation 7, where Dan is likewise not sealed. ⚙ We tier this low on purpose: the Revelation link is cross-Testament and rests on an omission in both lists, which is an argument from silence twice over.

Genesis 46:23 · Judges 18:30 · Revelation 7:5-8

basis: No Verifier-computed shared-lexeme basis exists for any of these pairs in this unit, and the Revelation leg is Greek against Hebrew, so a verbal tier is impossible in principle. The whole link rests on a contested reading of H313 ʼAchêr as the common noun "another" (asserted by Poole and reported by JFB, Cambridge and Ellicott, and rejected by Ellicott and K&D) plus Henry's association of the Judges 18 idolatry with the omission in Revelation 7. Provenance genuinely disputed; recorded as flagged.

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

Known to God: the name that replaces the name of Baal novel

Cambridge's reading of v. 6 is that Jediael, "Known to God," stands in the register where Ashbel, "Man of Baal," stood, and that the Chronicler is enacting Hosea 2:17, the taking of the names of the Baals out of Israel's mouth. ⚙ Our extension is this. The New Testament ends the same movement: to the one who overcomes is given a white stone "and in the stone a new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth it" (Revelation 2:17), and his name is not blotted out of the book of life but confessed before the Father (Revelation 3:5). Paul reverses the ordinary direction of knowing in the same terms: "now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God" (Galatians 4:9), and "if any man love God, the same is known of him" (1 Corinthians 8:3). A Benjamite entry whose whole name means known to God is the small Old Testament shape of the thing the gospel makes large: the register that saves is the one God keeps, and the name that counts is the one he gives. Marked novel: Cambridge supplies the Hosea link and the etymology, and the Christward extension is ours.

Hosea 2:17 · Revelation 2:17 · Revelation 3:5 · Galatians 4:9

Enrolled by pedigree, or written in heaven novel

The verb that closes each of the three Benjamite houses is וְהִתְיַחְשָׂם, the Hitpael of yâchas: they had themselves enrolled by pedigree. It is nearly a technical term of the restoration community, and Ezra 2:62 and Nehemiah 7:64 show its edge, where priests who sought their register and could not find it were excluded from the priesthood. ⚙ The New Testament takes up exactly that anxiety and answers it with a different register. The seventy return elated and are told to rejoice instead "because your names are written in heaven" (Luke 10:20); Paul names his fellow workers "whose names are in the book of life" (Philippians 4:3); the Hebrews are told they have come to "the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven" (Hebrews 12:23). The structure is the same in both Testaments, an enrolment that establishes who belongs, and the difference is who holds the book. Marked novel as a reading of this pericope: none of the commentators in the brief draws the line, and the connection is one of shared institution and vocabulary, not of quotation.

Ezra 2:62 · Luke 10:20 · Philippians 4:3 · Hebrews 12:23

Benjamin counted, Benjamin spared, Benjamin sent novel

Ellicott and Cambridge both read the totals of this unit against Judges 20:47, where the whole tribe was reduced to six hundred men hiding at the rock of Rimmon. K&D make the same point from the arithmetic: 45,600 at Numbers 26:41, then near annihilation, then 59,434 here. ⚙ The redemptive-historical line runs from that near extinction through this muster roll: the tribe that survived it gave Israel its first king, and after that king's house fell, gave the church the apostle who introduced himself as "of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin" (Philippians 3:5) and who argued from his own pedigree that God had not cast away his people (Romans 11:1). The 17,200 "going out in host to the battle" of v. 11 are the ancestors of a man whose warfare was of another kind (2 Corinthians 10:3-4). Marked novel: the survival of Benjamin after Judges 20 is the sourced observation of Ellicott, Cambridge and K&D, while the line drawn from this census to Paul is ours and rests on no commentator in the brief.

Judges 20:47 · Philippians 3:5 · Romans 11:1

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

Text. The Hebrew of v. 6 lacks the construct bnê that the syntax requires; Ellicott and Cambridge both explain it as haplography before בִּנְיָמִ֗ן, and BSB brackets the supplied "[sons]." At v. 10 the written and read forms of Jeush differ, which Ellicott records as "So Heb., margin. Text, Jeish." Verse 12 is the hardest in the unit; K&D's own verdict is that it "is unintelligible to us."

Numbers. The three totals in this unit (22,034, 20,200, 17,200) sum to 59,434. Cambridge and K&D print that figure. Ellicott prints 54,434 in his note on v. 11 and Gill prints 59,430; both figures are reproduced from the printed commentaries without correction, and both differ from the sum of the verses as they stand. Whether ʼeleph (H505) in such musters always denotes a literal thousand rather than a clan or contingent is a standing question in Old Testament study; the brief takes no position and neither do we.

Sources. Every quotation is a contiguous verbatim span from the public-domain commentaries named by tag, resolved from the brief by code rather than retyped. Ellicott, Cambridge, K&D, JFB, Poole, Gill and Pulpit carry the exegetical weight here; Henry's note is a comment on the whole chapter and is labelled as such where it is used; Geneva contributes only a marginal gloss; Benson and Poole are near-identical on v. 6, which is a known dependence between those two works. Pulpit's "us well" at v. 10 is a typographical error in the printed text and is reproduced rather than corrected.

What is uncertain. A great deal, and we have not hidden it. Whether Jediael is Ashbel renamed (Cambridge and Geneva yes, K&D probable, Barnes a later chieftain). Whether the Ehud of v. 10 is the judge of Judges 3:15 (Gill yes, K&D and Ellicott no). Whether Becher's house passed into Ephraim (Barnes and Pulpit yes, K&D no). Whether aher in v. 12 is a name or the common noun "another" concealing Dan (Poole, JFB and Cambridge lean yes, Ellicott and K&D no, Gill no). Whether the Bilhan and Jeush of v. 10 mark Edomite blood inside Benjamin (Ellicott "perhaps," Pulpit yes). The Chronicler preserved sources he did not harmonise, as Ellicott observes; our synthesis follows that discipline and leaves the disagreements standing where the evidence in this unit cannot close them.

Machine layer. Every paragraph marked ⚙ is fallible synthesis, including all three Christ readings, all of which are marked novel because no commentator in the brief draws them. The badges above state their own basis; two links are flagged rather than asserted.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)