The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

1 Kings14:21–24

Rehoboam Reigns in Judah

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

1 Kings 14:21–24 — Rehoboam Reigns in Judah. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

21

Meanwhile, Rehoboam son of Solomon reigned in Judah. He was forty-one years old when he became king, and he reigned seventeen years in Jerusalem, the city the LORD had chosen from all the tribes of Israel in which to put His Name. His mother’s name was Naamah the Ammonite.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ū·rə·ḥaḇ·‘ām ben- šə·lō·mōh mā·laḵ bî·hū·ḏāh rə·ḥaḇ·‘ām ’ar·bā·‘îm wə·’a·ḥaṯ šā·nāh ben- bə·mā·lə·ḵōw mā·laḵ ū·šă·ḇa‘ ‘eś·rêh šā·nāh bî·rū·šā·lim hā·‘îr Yah·weh bā·ḥar mik·kōl šiḇ·ṭê yiś·rā·’êl ’ă·šer- lā·śūm ’eṯ- šə·mōw šām ’im·mōw wə·šêm na·‘ă·māh hā·‘am·mō·nîṯ

Word by word31 · parsed
וּרְחַבְעָם֙ū·rə·ḥaḇ·‘āmMeanwhile, RehoboamH7346
√ Rᵉchabʻâm — Rechabam, an Israelite kingConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
בֶּן־ben-sonH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine singular construct
שְׁלֹמֹ֔הšə·lō·mōhof SolomonH8010
√ Shᵉlômôh — Shelomah, David's successorNounpropermasculine singular
מָלַ֖ךְmā·laḵreignedH4427
√ mâlak — to reignVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
mâlak — to reign (Qal perfect) The perfect states the reign as an accomplished whole before any evaluation is offered. Note what is not said: the formula that governs this second half of the book normally adds a verdict, and here the verdict is withheld until verse 22, where it falls not on Rehoboam but on Judah.
בִּֽיהוּדָ֑הbî·hū·ḏāhin JudahH3063
√ Yᵉhûwdâh — Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five IsraelitesPreposition-bNounpropermasculine singular
רְחַבְעָ֨םrə·ḥaḇ·‘ām[He]H7346
√ Rᵉchabʻâm — Rechabam, an Israelite kingNounpropermasculine singular
אַרְבָּעִ֣ים’ar·bā·‘îmwas forty-oneH705
√ ʼarbâʻîym — fortyNumbercommon plural
וְאַחַ֣תwə·’a·ḥaṯ. . .H259
√ ʼechâd — properly, united, iConjunctive wawNumberfeminine singular construct
שָׁנָה֩šā·nāhyearsH8141
√ shâneh — a year (as a revolution of time)Nounfeminine singular
בֶּן־ben-oldH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine singular construct
bên — a son, in the widest sense The age idiom, a son of forty and one year. Poole and Gill both press the arithmetic: born a year before Solomon's accession, "he was old enough to have been wiser" (Poole). Cambridge records the counter-pressure, that 2 Chronicles 13:7 calls him young and tender-hearted, and that a few manuscripts read 21; the Hebrew before us reads 41 and we have kept it.
בְּמָלְכ֜וֹbə·mā·lə·ḵōwwhen he became kingH4427
√ mâlak — to reignPreposition-bVerbQalInfinitive constructthird person masculine singular
מָלַ֣ךְmā·laḵand he reignedH4427
√ mâlak — to reignVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
וּֽשֲׁבַ֨עū·šă·ḇa‘seventeenH7651
√ shebaʻ — seven (as the sacred full one)Conjunctive wawNumberfeminine singular construct
עֶשְׂרֵ֥ה‘eś·rêh. . .H6240
√ ʻâsâr — ten (only in combination), iNumberfeminine singular
שָׁנָ֣ה׀šā·nāhyearsH8141
√ shâneh — a year (as a revolution of time)Nounfeminine singular
בִּירוּשָׁלִַ֗םbî·rū·šā·limin JerusalemH3389
√ Yᵉrûwshâlaim — Jerushalaim or Jerushalem, the capital city of PalestinePreposition-bNounproperfeminine singular
הָ֠עִירhā·‘îrthe cityH5892
√ ʻîyr — a city (a place guarded by waking or a watch) in the widest sense (even of a mere encampment or post)ArticleNounfeminine singular
ʻîyr — a city, a place guarded by a watch The one noun the historian pauses over, and he pauses by piling four clauses on it: the city, which YHWH chose, out of all the tribes, to set His Name there. Ellicott measures what that meant politically, that in the north "one capital succeeded another; Shechem, Tirzah, Samaria, Jezreel, became rival cities," while in Judah no city could stand beside Jerusalem. The weight of the noun is borrowed entirely from the verb that follows it.
יְהוָ֜הYah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
בָּחַ֨רbā·ḥarhad chosenH977
√ bâchar — properly, to try, iVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
bâchar — to choose, properly to try The theological pivot of the verse. YHWH is the subject of the only verb in the sentence that is not about Rehoboam. Pulpit draws the consequence: Bethel and Dan were no sanctuaries of God's choosing, and however shrunken the realm, Rehoboam still reigned in the capital of God's choice. K&D reads the same clause as a deliberate contrast with the idolatry of verse 23 rather than only a jab at the ten tribes.
מִכֹּל֙mik·kōlfrom allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholePreposition-mNounmasculine singular construct
שִׁבְטֵ֣יšiḇ·ṭêthe tribesH7626
√ shêbeṭ — a scion, iNounmasculine plural construct
יִשְׂרָאֵ֔לyiś·rā·’êlof IsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
אֲשֶׁר־’ă·šer-in whichH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
לָשׂ֨וּםlā·śūmto putH7760
√ sûwm — to put (used in a great variety of applications, literal, figurative, inferentially, and elliptically)Preposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
sûwm — to put, to set Qal infinitive construct with lᵉ: the purpose of the choosing. The city is not chosen for its site or its king but as the place where a Name is deposited. Everything the next three verses report happens inside that purpose clause.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
שְׁמ֥וֹšə·mōwHis NameH8034
√ shêm — an appellation, as amark or memorial of individualityNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
shêm — an appellation, a mark or memorial of individuality His Name is marked as a definite direct object by אֶת־, as if the Name were a thing set down in a place. The same noun returns four words later for Naamah's name, so the verse closes by setting the Name God put in Jerusalem beside the name of the Ammonite queen mother in the palace.
שָׁם֙šām. . .H8033
√ shâm — there (transferring to time) thenAdverb
אִמּ֔וֹ’im·mōwHis mother’sH517
√ ʼêm — a mother (as the bond of the family)Nounfeminine singular constructthird person masculine singular
ʼêm — a mother, as the bond of the family K&D denies that she is named because she seduced the king, and grounds the notice in the standing influence of the queen mother, since the mother is named for every king of Judah. JFB and Gill read it the other way, as an explanation of Rehoboam's drift. The text itself only names her.
וְשֵׁ֣םwə·šêmnameH8034
√ shêm — an appellation, as amark or memorial of individualityConjunctive wawNounmasculine singular construct
נַעֲמָ֖הna·‘ă·māhwas NaamahH5279
√ Naʻămâh — Naamah, the name of an antediluvian woman, of an Ammonitess, and of a place in PalestineNounproperfeminine singular
הָעַמֹּנִֽית׃hā·‘am·mō·nîṯthe AmmoniteH5984
√ ʻAmmôwnîy — an Ammonite or (the adjective) AmmonitishArticleNounproperfeminine singular
ʻAmmôwnîy — an Ammonite, Ammonitish Poole presses the law: a people "shut out of the congregation of his people for ever, Deu 23:3." The final word of a verse about the city God chose is the nationality God had excluded.
22

And Judah did evil in the sight of the LORD, and by the sins they committed they provoked Him to jealous anger more than all their fathers had done.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

yə·hū·ḏāh way·ya·‘aś hā·ra‘ bə·‘ê·nê Yah·weh bə·ḥaṭ·ṭō·ṯām ḥā·ṭā·’ū way·qan·’ū ’ō·ṯōw mik·kōl ’ă·šer ’ă·šer ’ă·ḇō·ṯām ‘ā·śū

Word by word14 · parsed
יְהוּדָ֛הyə·hū·ḏāhAnd JudahH3063
√ Yᵉhûwdâh — Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉhûwdâh — Judah The subject is the tribe, not the king. Pulpit makes the observation load-bearing: "the historian says 'Judah' (not Rehoboam) 'did evil.'" Ellicott draws the same line, that these sins are ascribed "not, as in the case of Solomon and most other kings, to the action of Rehoboam, but to that of the people at large."
וַיַּ֧עַשׂway·ya·‘aśdidH6213
√ ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest applicationConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
ʻâsâh — to do or make Qal consecutive imperfect: the narrative verb that moves the story on. It is answered at the end of the verse by the same root in the perfect (word 13) for what the fathers had done, so the sentence is built as a comparison of two doings.
הָרַ֖עhā·ra‘evilH7451
√ raʻ — bad or (as noun) evil (natural or moral)ArticleAdjectivemasculine singular
raʻ — bad, evil, natural or moral With the article, the evil, and set "in the eyes of YHWH." The evaluation is not the historian's private judgment but a report of what is seen from the one vantage point the book treats as decisive.
בְּעֵינֵ֣יbə·‘ê·nêin the sightH5869
√ ʻayin — an eye (literally or figuratively)Preposition-bNouncdc
יְהוָ֑הYah·wehof the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
בְּחַטֹּאתָ֖םbə·ḥaṭ·ṭō·ṯāmand by the sinsH2403
√ chaṭṭâʼâh — an offence (sometimes habitual sinfulness), and its penalty, occasion, sacrifice, or expiationPreposition-bNounfeminine plural constructthird person masculine plural
chaṭṭâʼâh — an offence, and its penalty or expiation The noun covers both the act and what the act incurs. Gill reads the plural concretely: "that is, with their idolatries; for they were the sins which moved the Lord to jealousy."
חָטָֽאוּ׃ḥā·ṭā·’ūthey committedH2398
√ châṭâʼ — properly, to missVerbQalPerfectthird person common plural
וַיְקַנְא֣וּway·qan·’ūthey provoked Him to jealous angerH7065
√ qânâʼ — to be (causatively, make) zealous, iConjunctive wawVerbPielConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
qânâʼ — to be or make zealous, jealous (Piel) The theological centre of the verse. K&D grounds the metaphor: the relation of God to His people "was regarded under the figure of a marriage, in which Jehovah appears as the husband of the nation, who is angry at the unfaithfulness of his wife." Pulpit adds the ethical edge, that Baal and Ashtoreth worship involved immoralities, "hence the special fitness of the word, which is only used of idolatry of one kind or other."
אֹת֗וֹ’ō·ṯōwH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object markerthird person masculine singular
מִכֹּל֙mik·kōlmore than allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholePreposition-mNounmasculine singular
kôl — the whole With the comparative min: "more than all."
אֲשֶׁ֣ר’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
אֲשֶׁ֥ר’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
אֲבֹתָ֔ם’ă·ḇō·ṯāmtheir fathersH1
√ ʼâb — father, in a literal and immediate, or figurative and remote applicationNounmasculine plural constructthird person masculine plural
ʼâb — father, literal and remote Which fathers? K&D supplies "under the Judges"; Gill enlarges it to "the times of Moses, Joshua, and the judges, and of their kings before their separation, Saul, David, and Solomon." Either way the comparison is internal to Israel's own history, which is what makes the charge unbearable: the worst generation of Judah is measured against the worst of its own past and exceeds it.
עָשׂ֣וּ‘ā·śūhad doneH6213
√ ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest applicationVerbQalPerfectthird person common plural
23

They also built for themselves high places, sacred pillars, and Asherah poles on every high hill and under every green tree.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

hêm·māh ḡam- way·yiḇ·nū lā·hem bā·mō·wṯ ū·maṣ·ṣê·ḇō·wṯ wa·’ă·šê·rîm ‘al kāl- ḡə·ḇō·hāh giḇ·‘āh wə·ṯa·ḥaṯ kāl- ra·‘ă·nān ‘êṣ

Word by word15 · parsed
הֵ֧מָּהhêm·māhTheyH1992
√ hêm — they (only used when emphatic)Pronounthird person masculine plural
גַם־ḡam-alsoH1571
√ gam — properly, assemblageConjunction
gam — properly, assemblage; also, even The emphatic particle that ties Judah's sin to the north's.
וַיִּבְנ֨וּway·yiḇ·nūbuiltH1129
√ bânâh — to build (literally and figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
bânâh — to build, literally and figuratively Qal consecutive imperfect. Cambridge explains the odd object: "We read constantly of 'houses' of the high places, and it is to these erections on some lofty hills that the 'building' here spoken of applies." Against the one house YHWH chose to have built for His Name (v. 21), Judah builds many.
לָהֶ֛םlā·hemfor themselves
Preposition-lPronounthird person masculine plural
בָּמ֥וֹתbā·mō·wṯhigh placesH1116
√ bâmâh — an elevationNounfeminine plural
bâmâh — an elevation The neutral topographical word that became the technical term for illicit sanctuaries. Gill concedes they were "allowed of, or at least connived at, before the temple was built," which is precisely what makes their revival damning: "the tribe of Judah could have no excuse for them, who had the temple in their tribe."
וּמַצֵּב֖וֹתū·maṣ·ṣê·ḇō·wṯsacred pillarsH4676
√ matstsêbâh — something stationed, iConjunctive wawNounfeminine plural
matstsêbâh — something stationed, a pillar K&D traces the whole slide: these stones were "originally dedicated to Jehovah" and commemorated divine revelation (Genesis 28:18), yet the law forbade them, "chiefly because the Canaanites had erected such monuments to Baal by the side of his altars," so that the worship of YHWH was "unconsciously identified with the worship of Baal." The corruption documented here is not only adopted paganism but native memorial piety gone over.
וַאֲשֵׁרִ֑יםwa·’ă·šê·rîmand Asherah polesH842
√ ʼăshêrâh — Asherah (or Astarte) a Phoenician goddessConjunctive wawNounfeminine plural
ʼăshêrâh — Asherah, a Phoenician goddess Pulpit sets the pair in order: the matstsêbâh of stone belongs to Baal, god of generation, the Asherah of wood to Ashtoreth, goddess of productive power. K&D notes the name travels from the object to the goddess herself (1 Kings 15:13; 18:19). What Judah builds on the hills is a theology of fertility, and verse 24 will show what such a theology asks of bodies.
עַ֚ל‘alonH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
כָּל־kāl-everyH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
גְבֹהָ֔הḡə·ḇō·hāhhighH1364
√ gâbôahh — elevated (or elated), powerful, arrogantAdjectivefeminine singular
gâbôahh — elevated, and so elated, arrogant The same adjective that describes a high hill describes a proud heart elsewhere in the canon. Here it is simply topography, but topography chosen: worship carried up above the chosen city.
גִּבְעָ֣הgiḇ·‘āhhillH1389
√ gibʻâh — a hillockNounfeminine singular
וְתַ֖חַתwə·ṯa·ḥaṯand underH8478
√ tachath — the bottom (as depressed)Conjunctive wawPreposition
כָּל־kāl-everyH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
רַעֲנָֽן׃ra·‘ă·nāngreenH7488
√ raʻănân — verdantAdjectivemasculine singular
raʻănân — verdant Paired with the high hill to make the standing Deuteronomic formula for Canaanite worship sites.
עֵ֥ץ‘êṣtreeH6086
√ ʻêts — a tree (from its firmness)Nounmasculine singular
ʻêts — a tree, from its firmness The last word of the Hebrew clause and the first material of the Asherah: the living tree overhead, the lopped trunk planted below.
24

There were even male shrine prostitutes in the land. They imitated all the abominations of the nations the LORD had driven out before the Israelites.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

hā·yāh wə·ḡam- qā·ḏêš ḇā·’ā·reṣ ‘ā·śū kə·ḵōl hat·tō·w·‘ă·ḇōṯ hag·gō·w·yim ’ă·šer Yah·weh hō·w·rîš mip·pə·nê bə·nê yiś·rā·’êl

Word by word14 · parsed
הָיָ֣הhā·yāhThere wereH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
hâyâh — to exist, to become A bare existence statement, singular, with no agent named. Nobody in the sentence is said to have installed them; they simply were in the land, which is how the historian reports a corruption that no longer needs sponsoring.
וְגַם־wə·ḡam-evenH1571
√ gam — properly, assemblageConjunction
gam — also, even The particle of accumulation, second in two verses, and K&D leans on it to argue that the consecrated men were incomers rather than native Judeans.
קָדֵ֖שׁqā·ḏêšmale shrine prostitutesH6945
√ qâdêsh — a (quasi) sacred person, iAdjectivemasculine singular
qâdêsh — a quasi sacred person, a devotee The unit's most terrible word, because it is a holiness word. Ellicott: the term "indicates the license, and even the sanction, of unnatural lusts in those consecrated to the abominations of Nature-worship." Barnes ties them to the Dea Syra; K&D, following Movers, to self-mutilated devotees of the Canaanite nature goddess. Deuteronomy 23:17 forbids the office by this exact noun, so the land is holding an office the law had abolished by name.
בָאָ֑רֶץḇā·’ā·reṣin the landH776
√ ʼerets — the earth (at large, or partitively a land)Preposition-b, ArticleNounfeminine singular
ʼerets — the earth, or a land With the article: the land, the covenant grant. Not a private vice but a state of the inheritance.
עָשׂ֗וּ‘ā·śūThey imitatedH6213
√ ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest applicationVerbQalPerfectthird person common plural
כְּכֹל֙kə·ḵōlallH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholePreposition-kNounmasculine singular construct
הַתּוֹעֲבֹ֣תhat·tō·w·‘ă·ḇōṯthe abominationsH8441
√ tôwʻêbah — properly, something disgusting (morally), iArticleNounfeminine plural construct
tôwʻêbah — properly, something disgusting (morally) The Torah's technical word for what defiles the land itself, and a construct here: the abominations of the nations. The charge is not that Judah sinned but that Judah reproduced a catalogue, and Gill points the reader to the list in Leviticus 18.
הַגּוֹיִ֔םhag·gō·w·yimof the nationsH1471
√ gôwy — a foreign nationArticleNounmasculine plural
אֲשֶׁר֙’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
יְהוָ֔הYah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
הוֹרִ֣ישׁhō·w·rîšhad driven outH3423
√ yârash — to occupy (by driving out previous tenants, and possessing in their place)VerbHifilPerfectthird person masculine singular
yârash — to occupy by driving out previous tenants (Hiphil) The verb of the conquest turned into an indictment. K&D draws the conclusion the grammar invites: "This sinking into heathen abominations was soon followed by the punishment, that Judah was given up to the power of the heathen." In the next verses Shishak comes up against Jerusalem.
מִפְּנֵ֖יmip·pə·nêbeforeH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-mNouncommon plural construct
pânîym — the face, as the part that turns "From before the face of" the sons of Israel: the eviction was a removal from God's people's presence, which is why their imitation is not merely disobedience but a reversal of the conquest.
בְּנֵ֥יbə·nêthe IsraelitesH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural construct
יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃פyiś·rā·’êl. . .H3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, the symbolic name of Jacob The unit's last word, and it is the covenant name, used here of the whole people for whose sake the land was cleared.

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. The city God chose, the king God did not — 14:21

⚙ The verse is built out of two names and one divine verb. Rehoboam is named twice (words 0 and 5), his mother is named at the end, and between them stands the single clause in which YHWH is the subject: בָּחַר (bâchar, H977, perfect), "had chosen," with the infinitive of purpose לָשׂוּם, to set His Name there. Cambridge presses the tense, that "the choice had been made long before," and Pulpit draws out why the historian bothers to say it here: God's appointment made Jerusalem the religious centre, so that Bethel and Dan were no sanctuaries of His choosing, and however shrunken the kingdom, Rehoboam "still reigned in the capital of God's choice." K&D reads the same clause forward rather than northward: the contrast is not chiefly with the ten tribes but with the idolatry of verse 23. Ellicott takes the political measure of it, that in Israel one capital succeeded another, Shechem, Tirzah, Samaria, Jezreel, while "In Judah no city could be for a moment placed on the level of the hallowed city of Jerusalem." On the age, the commentators split without resolving: Benson holds to the Hebrew's forty-one and concludes he "was born in the last year of David's life"; Poole and Gill turn the number into an accusation, that he was old enough to have known better; Cambridge records the pressure from 2 Chronicles 13:7 and the minority reading of 21, and asks whether the compilers simply used different documents. The last word of the verse belongs to Naamah, and here the voices genuinely conflict: JFB and Gill make her the explanation of Rehoboam's drift, Gill saying she was "the instrument of drawing him into idolatry," while K&D refuses that reading and grounds the notice in the standing office of the queen mother, since her name is given for every king of Judah. Poole supplies the legal weight neither side disputes: an Ammonitess, of "a people cursed by God, and shut out of the congregation of his people for ever, Deu 23:3."

ii. Judah made Him jealous — 14:22

⚙ The verdict falls on a people, not a person. Pulpit fixes on the subject: "the historian says 'Judah' (not Rehoboam) 'did evil'"; Ellicott says the same and explains it by Rehoboam's weakness, "unfit for taking the initiative either in good or evil." Ellicott also supplies the genealogy of the sin: "The apostasy of Judah was evidently the harvest of the deadly seed sown by the commanding influence of Solomon, under whose idolatry the young men had grown up." The verb is וַיְקַנְאוּ (qânâʼ, H7065) in the Piel, with אֹתוֹ making God its object: they made Him jealous. Cambridge traces the word back to Sinai, where "Jehovah had called himself a jealous God" (Exodus 20:5); Barnes sends the reader to the same place and to Exodus 34:15; K&D explains the figure, a marriage in which YHWH is the husband angered at his wife's unfaithfulness; Benson had already put it plainly, "as the adulterous wife provokes her husband by breaking the marriage covenant"; Pulpit adds that the rites in question "involved unutterable immoralities, hence the special fitness of the word." On the timing, JFB, Poole, Barnes, Gill, Pulpit and K&D agree that the defection came after three faithful years, and all of them are reading that from 2 Chronicles 11:17 and 12:1, not from Kings. Kings itself gives no date. The comparison מִכֹּל, "more than all that their fathers had done," is measured against Israel's own past: K&D supplies "under the Judges," Gill widens it to Moses, Joshua, the judges and the united kings.

iii. On every high hill and under every verdant tree — 14:23

⚙ Three objects are built: בָּמוֹת high places, מַצֵּבוֹת pillars, אֲשֵׁרִים Asherim. Cambridge and K&D agree that matstsêbâh means a stone set up and nothing more, so that the AV's "images" overtranslates; K&D then shows how the neutral object went bad, since such stones were "originally dedicated to Jehovah" and marked divine revelations (Genesis 28:18), and were forbidden chiefly because the Canaanites set the same monuments beside Baal's altars until YHWH's worship was "unconsciously identified with the worship of Baal." Pulpit supplies the pairing, stone pillar to Baal, wooden Asherah to Ashtoreth, and insists with K&D that "grove" is simply a mistranslation. Barnes reads the emphatic גַם־הֵמָּה as the point of the verse: not only Israel, but Judah too. Poole and Benson both press the aggravation, that Judah had the temple, access to it, priests and Levites, and the warning example of the north, so the building of high places "expressed a greater contempt of God and his express command." Barnes locates the tree concretely: the notable single trees that served as local landmarks and shade for travellers. ⚙ One grammatical detail deserves weight that the commentators pass over: the verb they built governs all three objects, including the wooden Asherim, so the sentence treats the whole apparatus as one construction project. Judah is not drifting; Judah is building.

iv. The consecrated abomination — 14:24

⚙ The unit ends on a holiness word used of an obscenity. קָדֵשׁ (qâdêsh, H6945) is properly "a consecrated one": Barnes renders it literally "(men) consecrated"; Ellicott names the horror, that the derivation "indicates the license, and even the sanction, of unnatural lusts in those consecrated to the abominations of Nature-worship"; Pulpit identifies them from Deuteronomy 23:18 as male devotees set apart to Astarte; K&D, citing Movers, describes them as emasculated Canaanite hierodules, and argues from the particle וְגַם that they were foreigners who entered Judah when idolatry took the upper hand. Poole and Benson both read the verse through Paul, Poole noting that "God doth frequently punish idolatry with corporeal uncleanness, Romans 1:21, 28"; Geneva compresses it to a maxim, that where idolatry reigns all horrible vices are committed. Then the final clause turns the knife with a verb: הוֹרִישׁ, the Hiphil of yârash, the very word of the conquest, "which the LORD dispossessed from before the sons of Israel." Pulpit quotes Wordsworth: "Here we see a reason for God's command, requiring the extirpation of the Canaanites." K&D states the consequence the narrative is about to record: Judah "was given up to the power of the heathen." ⚙ The unit's last word is Israel, the covenant name, and the sentence has just used it of the people for whose sake the land was cleared of exactly what they now practise.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested against the text. Four verses, and the structure is a ring: the Name that YHWH set (לָשׂוּם) in a city He chose (בָּחַר), against the pillars Judah set up and the shrines Judah built on every hill. The grammar makes the contrast for us. God's two verbs in this unit are perfects, settled before the story starts: He had chosen (bâchar), He had dispossessed (hôrîsh). Judah's are the consecutive imperfects that push the narrative along, they did, they made Him jealous, they built, with perfects trailing behind them for the habit already formed (they sinned, they did). The settled acts are His; the accumulating ones are theirs, and each of the last two verses opens its charge with a particle of piling on, gam and then and gam. What the passage exposes is not that Judah lacked religion but that Judah had too much of it in too many places. Jerusalem stood, the temple stood, the priesthood was in the tribe, and the temple service never stopped: K&D observes that the external worship of Jehovah was still maintained there and performed by Rehoboam himself with princely pomp (1 Kings 14:28) while the hills filled with Asherim. Proximity to the chosen place saved nobody. The most frightening word in the unit is the one that sounds religious: קָדֵשׁ, consecrated. Judah did not abandon the vocabulary of holiness; it kept the vocabulary and filled it with abomination, which is a sin available to every age that still says the words. Henry's diagnosis seems right to us and we cannot improve on it: the splendour of the temple and the pomp of the priesthood "could not prevail to keep them close to it," and nothing less than the pouring out of the Spirit will. The historian's own remedy, if he offers one, is buried in verse 21: the choosing was God's before it was anybody's, and a covenant that rests on His perfect verbs can survive a generation of theirs.

Judah kept every holy word and emptied them one by one; the last of them, consecrated, it hung on a man in a shrine.

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The consecrated ones: a rare noun that maps the whole disease verbal / quotation: confirmed

קָדֵשׁ (qâdêsh, H6945) is one of the rarest nouns in the unit, and every one of its few canonical occurrences belongs to the same story. Deuteronomy 23:17 forbids the office; here it exists under Rehoboam; Asa purges it (1 Kings 15:12); Jehoshaphat removes the remnant (1 Kings 22:46); Josiah tears down their houses beside the Asherah in the temple itself (2 Kings 23:7); and Job 36:14 uses the word for a life that ends in shame. Pulpit and K&D both read the noun collectively and both connect it with Deuteronomy 23:18. The chain is not a motif imposed on the texts: it is the actual legislative, historical and wisdom track of a single word.

Deuteronomy 23:17 · 1 Kings 15:12 · 1 Kings 22:46 · 2 Kings 23:7 · Job 36:14

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H6945 qâdêsh, attested in only 6 verses of the canon, so the overlap is lexically rare rather than incidental; 2 Kings 23:7 additionally shares H842 ʼăshêrâh (in 40 vv). No quotation is claimed, only a rare verbal link.

"On every high hill and under every verdant tree": a Deuteronomic formula recited back as indictment verbal / quotation: confirmed

⚙ The closing phrase of v. 23 is not the historian's own wording but a set formula from the law of the sanctuary. Pulpit states the provenance flatly: "The phrase is from the Pentateuch, Deuteronomy 12:2," the very passage commanding Israel to destroy the places where the nations served their gods on the high mountains and under every verdant tree. K&D sends the reader to the same verse. The formula then becomes the standing charge sheet of the historians and prophets: Israel under Hoshea (2 Kings 17:10), Ahaz (2 Kings 16:4; 2 Chronicles 28:4), and Jeremiah's twice repeated accusation (Jeremiah 2:20; 3:6), with Jeremiah 17:2 adding the Asherim beside the green trees. Judah in Rehoboam's day is being described in the exact words of the command it was breaking.

Deuteronomy 12:2 · 2 Kings 17:10 · 2 Kings 16:4 · 2 Chronicles 28:4 · Jeremiah 2:20 · Jeremiah 3:6 · Jeremiah 17:2

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H7488 raʻănân (in 20 vv, the controlling rare term), with H1389 gibʻâh (71 vv) and H6086 ʻêts (288 vv) recurring in the same fixed order in every listed verse; Deuteronomy 12:2 additionally shares H1364 gâbôahh with Jeremiah 3:6. Pulpit and K&D both name Deuteronomy 12:2 as the source of the phrase. This is a recited formula, not a citation formula, so no quotation marker is claimed.

The annal doubled: 1 Kings 14:31 and the Chronicler's notice structural / thematic: confirmed

⚙ Two other passages carry nearly this same sentence. Ten verses later, 1 Kings 14:31 repeats the Ammonite mother's name, which K&D and Gill both note as deliberate repetition, K&D explaining it from the standing practice of naming the queen mother for every king of Judah. 2 Chronicles 12:13 gives the parallel annal, with the age, the seventeen years, the chosen city and the Ammonitess. Cambridge, Barnes, Ellicott and K&D all work back and forth across these three notices, and Cambridge suggests the compilers may have "used different documents and did not try to reconcile them."

1 Kings 14:31 · 2 Chronicles 12:13

basis: Verifier: 2 Chronicles 12:13 shares H5984 ʻAmmôwnîy (21 vv), H7626 shêbeṭ (178 vv), H705 ʼarbâʻîym (123 vv); 1 Kings 14:31 shares H5984 ʻAmmôwnîy (21 vv), H7346 Rᵉchabʻâm (41 vv), H4427 mâlak (284 vv). None of these lexemes is rare enough to carry a verbal claim on frequency alone, so the link is recorded as a synoptic and formulaic parallel rather than a quotation.

Naamah: a name shared, and nothing else (recorded so it is not mistaken for a link) flagged: verify source

⚙ The Verifier's lexical scan returns two further hits on נַעֲמָה (Naʻămâh, H5279), a name that occurs in only five verses: Genesis 4:22, where Naamah is the sister of Tubal-cain in the line of Lamech, and Joshua 15:41, where Naamah is a town in the Shephelah of Judah. Rarity alone would tempt a verbal tier here, and it should not. None of our commentators draws any connection, and a shared proper name across an antediluvian genealogy, a town list and a queen mother of Judah is homonymy, not intertextuality. We record the machine's result and decline its implication.

Genesis 4:22 · Joshua 15:41

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H5279 Naʻămâh (in only 5 vv), plus H6240 ʻâsâr (291 vv) at Joshua 15:41. The lexical overlap is genuine but semantically empty: three unrelated referents share one name, and no commentator in this unit proposes a link. Flagged so the rarity score is not read as evidence.

Jealousy: the word of Sinai turned back on the covenant people structural / thematic: confirmed

⚙ Four of our commentators independently route וַיְקַנְאוּ (qânâʼ, H7065) back to the Decalogue. Cambridge: "Jehovah had called himself a jealous God, when the Law was given on Sinai (Exodus 20:5)." Pulpit cites Exodus 20:5, Exodus 34:14 and Numbers 5:14 as the same word; Barnes sends the reader to Exodus 20:5 and to his own note on Exodus 34:15; K&D refers the whole figure to his comment on Exodus 20:5 and cites Numbers 5:14 for the marital use. The relation is a marriage and the charge is adultery, which is why Numbers 5, the law of the jealous husband, belongs on the list.

Exodus 20:5 · Exodus 34:14 · Numbers 5:14

basis: No Verifier-computed shared-lexeme basis was supplied for these pairs, and the Sinai phrase uses the adjectival form of the root rather than the Piel verb found here, so we claim no identity of Strong's number. The link is recorded on the converging authority of Cambridge, Pulpit, Barnes and K&D, all of whom name Exodus 20:5 for this word, with K&D and Pulpit adding Numbers 5:14.

Idolatry answered by being handed over (cross-Testament) structural / thematic: confirmed

⚙ Poole reads v. 24 through Paul in as many words: "God doth frequently punish idolatry with corporeal uncleanness, Romans 1:21, 28." Benson states the same order of cause and effect: "They dishonoured God by the sin of idolatry, and therefore God left them to dishonour their own bodies in this abominable manner." The pattern Paul describes, exchange of the glory of God followed by a giving over, is the pattern Kings narrates in sequence: v. 23 the built shrines, v. 24 the consecrated men. ⚙ We note honestly that Kings juxtaposes without asserting the causal link; the causation is Paul's, applied here by Poole and Benson.

Romans 1:21-28 · Leviticus 18:24-30

basis: A Greek to Hebrew pair cannot share Strong's numbers, so no verbal tier is possible and none is claimed. The basis is the shared pattern (idolatry, then bodily defilement, then loss of the land) recorded by Poole and Benson on this verse, with Leviticus 18:24 to 30 supplying the land-vomiting sanction that Gill cites here for the abominations of the nations.

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

The Name set in a place, and the Name made flesh ancient/widely-held

⚙ The single divine purpose clause of the unit is לָשׂוּם אֶת־שְׁמוֹ שָׁם, "to set His Name there." The Name is treated as an object placed in a location, which is how Deuteronomy 12:5 already spoke of the chosen place, and it is the whole reason Jerusalem outranks Bethel and Dan, as Pulpit says here. The New Testament does not abolish that grammar; it relocates it. John says the Word tabernacled among us and we beheld His glory, and Jesus applies the temple itself to His body. ⚙ Read from this unit, the movement is exact: a Name set in a city that could not keep it, and then a Name borne in a body that could. This is the ordinary apostolic reading of the temple, not a novelty, though the particular route through this verse is ours.

Deuteronomy 12:5 · John 1:14 · John 2:19-21

The son of Solomon who failed, and the Son of David who did not ancient/widely-held

⚙ The unit opens with a genealogy in miniature, רְחַבְעָם בֶּן־שְׁלֹמֹה, Rehoboam son of Solomon, and Matthew's genealogy of Jesus carries the same link (Matthew 1:7). Benson's verdict on him is the point: with every advantage of birth and education "he was a weak and inconsiderate prince, who, instead of being a blessing, proved a curse to his kingdom." Yet the throne promised in 2 Samuel 7:12 to 16 was promised with the express provision of chastening and not of withdrawal, and Luke 1:32 to 33 announces the throne of David to a son whose kingdom has no end. ⚙ Kings tells the story of that promise being carried by men who cannot keep it: the verse that names the failing heir is the same verse that reports God's choice standing unrevoked behind him. The Davidic typology is ancient and widely held; the reading of the chosen-city clause as the promise's survival mechanism in this particular verse is our own emphasis.

2 Samuel 7:12-16 · Matthew 1:7 · Luke 1:32-33

Consecration reclaimed: qâdêsh and the one who sanctifies Himself novel

⚙ The unit's final outrage is carried by a word from the holiness root: קָדֵשׁ, "a consecrated one" (Barnes, literally "(men) consecrated"; Ellicott on the horrible significance of the derivation). Judah's last stage of decay is not the loss of the language of consecration but its capture. Against that, John 17:19 has Jesus say "for them I sanctify myself," and Hebrews 13:12 says He suffered outside the gate to sanctify the people by His own blood, which returns the word to a body that does not defile it. ⚙ We mark this as novel: no commentator in this unit draws the contrast, and it rests on a wordplay between a Hebrew noun and a Greek verb, which is a resonance of concept and not a verbal link. It is offered to be tested, not leaned on.

John 17:19 · Hebrews 13:12

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

⚙ Text and translation. The Hebrew here is not in doubt except at one number. Rehoboam's age at accession stands as אַרְבָּעִים וְאַחַת, forty and one, and we have translated it so. Ellicott records the difficulty (the youth ascribed to him in chapter 12, and the pressure it puts on Solomon's forty years) and the proposal to read "twenty-one" by a slight change of numerals, but concludes "the combined authority supporting the present reading is strong." Benson notes Houbigant's sixteen, following the Seventy, and declines it. Cambridge reports 21 in a few manuscripts and asks whether different documents lie behind Kings and Chronicles. Pulpit prints "forty [or twenty]". We have followed the Hebrew and flagged the dispute rather than resolving it. Pulpit also records an LXX variant of the queen mother's name, Naanan for Naamah.

⚙ Words where the English tradition is known to be wrong. "Groves" for אֲשֵׁרִים is a mistranslation, as Cambridge (R.V. Ashêrim), K&D ("does not mean a grove") and Pulpit ("proves conclusively that the translation 'grove' is a mistaken one") all state; BSB's "Asherah poles" is nearer. "Images" for מַצֵּבוֹת reads idolatry into a neutral noun meaning a stone set up (Cambridge, K&D). "Sodomites" for קָדֵשׁ is an English tradition, not a translation; the word means a consecrated person, and BSB renders the sense correctly while losing the root.

⚙ What our sources import from outside Kings. The three faithful years, the fortified cities, the immigration of priests and Levites, and the dating of the defection to the fourth year all come from 2 Chronicles 11 and 12, not from this chapter. JFB, Poole, Barnes, Gill, Pulpit, Ellicott and K&D all use them; Kings says none of it. Benson's identification of Naamah as the daughter of Shobi the Ammonite is inference, not a statement of any text we hold. The claim that Naamah seduced Rehoboam (Gill, JFB) is contested by K&D in this same unit, and the text asserts only her name and nation. Gill's Herodotus, Xenophon and Strabo citations describe Persian and Thracian practice and illustrate rather than evidence v. 23; K&D's account of the galli depends on Movers and on Augustine's report about Carthage, which are late comparanda.

⚙ Machine layer. The thread bases are Verifier-computed shared Strong's lexemes with canonical frequencies, quoted in each badge. Two honesty flags: the Naamah pair (Genesis 4:22, Joshua 15:41) is a rare-lexeme hit with no semantic content and is tiered flagged rather than verbal; the Exodus 20:5 jealousy link has no Verifier basis and rests on the commentators, so it is tiered structural even though the connection is strongly attested. The Romans 1 thread is cross-Testament and therefore cannot be tiered verbal on principle. Everything marked ⚙ is fallible synthesis and should be tested against the text.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)