In the inner sanctuary he made two cherubim, each ten cubits high, out of olive wood.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
bad·də·ḇîr way·ya·‘aś šə·nê ḵə·rū·ḇîm ‘e·śer ’am·mō·wṯ qō·w·mā·ṯōw šā·men ‘ă·ṣê-
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Cherubim
1 Kings 6:23–30 — The Cherubim. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
In the inner sanctuary he made two cherubim, each ten cubits high, out of olive wood.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
bad·də·ḇîr way·ya·‘aś šə·nê ḵə·rū·ḇîm ‘e·śer ’am·mō·wṯ qō·w·mā·ṯōw šā·men ‘ă·ṣê-
One wing of the first cherub was five cubits long, and the other wing was five cubits long as well. So the full wingspan was ten cubits.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
kə·nap̄ hā·’e·ḥāṯ hak·kə·rūḇ wə·ḥā·mêš ’am·mō·wṯ haš·šê·nîṯ kə·nap̄ hak·kə·rūḇ wə·ḥā·mêš ’am·mō·wṯ miq·ṣō·wṯ kə·nā·p̄āw wə·‘aḏ- qə·ṣō·wṯ kə·nā·p̄āw ‘e·śer ’am·mō·wṯ
The second cherub also measured ten cubits; both cherubim had the same size and shape,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
haš·šê·nî hak·kə·rūḇ wə·‘e·śer bā·’am·māh liš·nê hak·kə·ru·ḇîm ’e·ḥāḏ mid·dāh ’a·ḥaṯ wə·qe·ṣeḇ
and the height of each cherub was ten cubits.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
qō·w·maṯ hā·’e·ḥāḏ hak·kə·rūḇ wə·ḵên haš·šê·nî hak·kə·rūḇ ‘e·śer bā·’am·māh
And he placed the cherubim inside the innermost room of the temple. Since their wings were spread out, the wing of the first cherub touched one wall, while the wing of the second cherub touched the other wall, and in the middle of the room their wingtips touched.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·yit·tên ’eṯ- hak·kə·rū·ḇîm bə·ṯō·wḵ hap·pə·nî·mî hab·ba·yiṯ hak·kə·ru·ḇîm kan·p̄ê way·yip̄·rə·śū ’eṯ- kə·nap̄- hā·’e·ḥāḏ wat·tig·ga‘ baq·qîr ū·ḵə·nap̄ haš·šê·nî hak·kə·rūḇ nō·ḡa·‘aṯ haš·šê·nî baq·qîr ’el- tō·wḵ hab·ba·yiṯ wə·ḵan·p̄ê·hem kā·nāp̄ nō·ḡə·‘ōṯ ’el- kā·nāp̄
He also overlaid the cherubim with gold.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·ṣap̄ ’eṯ- hak·kə·rū·ḇîm zā·hāḇ
Then he carved the walls all around the temple, in both the inner and outer sanctuaries, with carved engravings of cherubim, palm trees, and open flowers.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’êṯ qā·la‘ qî·rō·wṯ kāl- mê·saḇ hab·ba·yiṯ mil·lip̄·nîm wə·la·ḥî·ṣō·wn miq·lə·‘ō·wṯ pit·tū·ḥê kə·rū·ḇîm wə·ṯi·mō·rōṯ ū·p̄ə·ṭū·rê ṣiṣ·ṣîm
And he overlaid the temple floor with gold in both the inner and outer sanctuaries.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’eṯ- ṣip·pāh hab·ba·yiṯ qar·qa‘ zā·hāḇ lip̄·nî·māh wə·la·ḥî·ṣō·wn
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
Four verses say almost one thing. Ten cubits high (v. 23), five and five and therefore ten across (v. 24), ten again for the second (v. 25), ten again for both (v. 26). ⚙ The narrator is not padding; he is measuring aloud, and the repetition is the reporting. Pulpit hears the pattern and calls the constant recurrence of ten the symbol of completeness, though that is a symbolic judgment the text does not make for itself. What the Hebrew does make for itself is the double formula of v. 25: מִדָּה אַחַת and וְקֶצֶב אֶחָד, one measurement and one qetseb. Cambridge presses that second word, insisting it means form and not size, the size having been stated already. Qetseb (H7095) occurs in only three verses of the Hebrew Bible, and it means a shape cut to a pattern. Gill draws out what the sameness might signify, the perfect agreement of angels or the consent of Christ's witnesses, and honestly leaves both open. Against all this precision stands a gap the commentators cannot close. Ellicott records that the form of the cherubim is nowhere distinctly stated in Scripture, and quotes Josephus saying that no one can tell or even conjecture what shape they were. K&D supplies a human form and an upright stance, but he does so from 2 Chronicles 3:13, not from 1 Kings. ⚙ The text measures exhaustively and describes almost nothing: we are told to the cubit how much space the guardians filled and not one word about their faces.
Solomon gives the cherubim to the room (וַיִּתֵּן, nâthan, H5414), and the verse then uses nâgaʻ, to touch, three times: the wing touched the wall, the second wing touching the other wall, their wings touching wing unto wing. Barnes marks the change from the tabernacle exactly: Moses' cherubim “covered with their wings over the mercy seat,” Solomon's “stretched out theirs to the full,” so that four wings of five cubits spanned the twenty-cubit room. Benson adds the axis: these touch the south and north walls, whereas the wings of Moses' pair ran east to west, since those two faced one another. Cambridge concludes that in Solomon's temple the cherubim did not face one another as they expressly did in the tabernacle (Exodus 25:20). ⚙ Ellicott, who reads the same evidence, proposes that the change of attitude marks a change of idea: the old attitude is worship of God, the new rather the manifestation of His glory to man. That is a real reading, and it is his, not the narrator's. One dispute here is grammatical and should not be smoothed over: וַיִּפְרְשׂוּ is a plural verb with no stated subject. Cambridge calls it the frequent Hebrew way of saying that the cherubim stretched forth their wings; Pulpit calls precisely that reading “altogether inadmissible”; Gill offers the carvers as the subject. The English versions choose quietly. The Hebrew does not.
The material is named twice and it matters both times. עֲצֵי־שָׁמֶן is literally “trees of oil,” and Poole, Gill, Barnes, Pulpit and K&D all pause on it: Poole and Gill note that oily trees are sometimes distinguished from olives (Isaiah 41:19), while Barnes, Pulpit and K&D settle on the oleaster, the wild olive, because its wood is firm, fine grained and durable. Pulpit observes the hierarchy of woods across the whole building: olive for the cherubim, the oracle doors and the doorposts; cedar for the walls; cypress for the floor and outer doors. Then v. 28 covers the olive with gold (tsâphâh, H6823, to sheet over with metal), and v. 30 covers the floor too, and JFB reports the finished effect: neither wood nor stone was seen, nothing met the eye but pure gold. Barnes explains the substitution plainly: the tabernacle cherubim were solid gold, and these, being so much larger, had to be wood merely plated. ⚙ There is an honest tension here worth naming rather than resolving. The room's whole visible surface is a covering. What bears the weight, the durable oleaster, is exactly what no one in the room could see.
Verse 29 turns from the two standing figures to the whole house, and the vocabulary goes technical and rare: מִקְלְעוֹת (miqlaʻath, H4734, in only four verses) and פִּתּוּחֵי (pittûwach, H6603), relief carvings of engravings, of cherubim, palm-figures and blossoms burst open. Pulpit notes that pittûwach is the word used of gravings in stone and in metal (Exodus 28:11, 36). Three commentators read the imagery three ways. Poole and Benson take the palms as emblems of peace and victory over enemies; Barnes observes that palms, cherubs and flowers together resemble Assyrian ornament closely enough that the resemblance “can scarcely be accidental”; Pulpit, following Bahr, reads cherubim, palms and flowers as animal, vegetable and blooming life brought before the Creator. K&D, reasoning from Ezekiel 41:18, holds that the palms alternated with the cherubs, one cherub between two palms, while admitting that 1 Kings says nothing about the distribution. Ellicott raises the difficulty that if the verse is taken literally the cherub carving covers the walls of the whole house, though the cherubim belong especially to the oracle. ⚙ Whatever the arrangement, the effect described is a room of living forms: guardians, trees and open flowers, worked into every wall, inner and outer, and floored with gold.
⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested against the text. Scripture's first cherubim stand at the east of the garden with a flaming sword, to guard the way to the tree of life (Genesis 3:24, the passage Cambridge names as their first mention). Here two of them stand again, and the whole paragraph is spent measuring how much of the room they fill: ten cubits tall, ten cubits wide, wing touching the wall on one side and wing touching wing in the middle. Nothing gets past them. And yet what lies beneath those spread wings, when the ark is finally carried in (1 Kings 8:6), is the mercy seat. The same figures that barred a way are now stationed over the place where blood is sprinkled and the LORD speaks, and the room takes its name, debir, from speaking. ⚙ I do not think the text says this, so I hold it loosely: the guardians have not been removed, they have been given a covering to stand over. The way is still guarded; the guarding has simply been relocated to a seat of mercy. Add the carved walls of v. 29, palms and blossoms burst open on every side, and the inner room begins to look like the garden the cherubim were first posted to close. It is furnished as Eden, staffed as Eden, and floored with gold, and a man may enter it once a year with blood. Pulpit and Barnes both note the room's resemblance to the sanctuaries of Egypt and Assyria; ⚙ the deeper resemblance may be to a garden east of nowhere, with the sword lowered and the wings spread.
Not Scripture, but this tool's fallible reading: the cherubim who once closed a garden are set over a mercy seat, and the guarding is not cancelled, it is relocated.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The decorative vocabulary of v. 29 is not new in the chapter. 1 Kings 6:18 describes the cedar of the house carved with gourds and צִצִּים (tsîyts, H6731) burst open (pâṭar, H6362), using the same technical carving noun מִקְלַעַת (miqlaʻath, H4734). The Verifier records all three lexemes as shared, and two of them are genuinely rare: miqlaʻath stands in only four verses of the Hebrew Bible and pâṭar in eight. ⚙ The repetition binds the cherub-and-palm work of v. 29 to the earlier flower work as one continuous decorative scheme rather than a second, separate program.
1 Kings 6:18
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H4734 miqlaʻath (in 4 vv), H6362 pâṭar (in 8 vv), H6731 tsîyts (in 15 vv). Two of the three are rare enough to make this a real verbal link within one chapter; it is lexical repetition by the same writer, not a quotation of another book.
1 Kings 6:32 and 6:35 carry the cherubim out of the oracle and toward the doorways; Ellicott, writing on v. 23, names those two verses as the places where cherubim were similarly carved. The Verifier records H8081 shemen (oil), H6086 ʻêts (wood) and H3742 kᵉrûwb shared with v. 23, and a triple recurrence of kᵉrûwb at v. 35. ⚙ All three lexemes are common, so the link is one of pattern rather than of rare wording: the same wood and the same figures return at the way in, so that whatever the cherubim stand over inside, they are also set at the entrance.
1 Kings 6:32 · 1 Kings 6:35
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H8081 shemen (in 176 vv), H3742 kᵉrûwb (in 66 vv), H6086 ʻêts (in 288 vv). All three are common, so the shared vocabulary is recorded as a repeated pattern of materials and figures, not as a rare verbal link.
2 Chronicles 3:11-12 gives the same wings and the same cubits, and 2 Chronicles 3:13 adds two details 1 Kings never states: that the cherubim stood upon their feet and that their faces were turned toward the house. Barnes, Pulpit and K&D all build their reconstruction of the figures on that verse; K&D also takes from 2 Chronicles 3:10 the phrase he renders as opus statuarium, admitting that its meaning “cannot be more precisely defined.” The Verifier confirms the shared lexemes with vv. 23 to 26. ⚙ The badge is deliberately not verbal: kᵉrûwb and ʼammâh are common words, and what binds the passages is a parallel account, not a quotation. The honest note for the reader is that every statement in the commentaries about the posture and the faces of these cherubim comes from Chronicles, not from 1 Kings.
2 Chronicles 3:11 · 2 Chronicles 3:12
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H3742 kᵉrûwb (in 66 vv) and H520 ʼammâh (in 132 vv). Both common; the link is a parallel narrative of the same event, tiered structural rather than verbal.
Two different Ezekiel passages meet this unit from two directions. At Ezekiel 10:5 the wings of the cherubim are heard as far as the outer court, the same nouns kᵉrûwb and kânâph that fill 1 Kings 6:23-27; at Ezekiel 41:25 cherubim and palm-figures are carved on the doors of the visionary temple, exactly as at 1 Kings 6:29. K&D uses Ezekiel 41:18 to argue that the palms alternated with the cherubs in Solomon's house. Ellicott points to the visions of Ezekiel 1 and 10 as the passages that “have determined the imagery of the Apocalypse.” ⚙ The shared lexemes are common, so the tie is thematic: Solomon's carvers cut in wood what Ezekiel later sees moving.
Ezekiel 10:5 · Ezekiel 41:25
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H3742 kᵉrûwb (in 66 vv), H3671 kânâph (in 85 vv), H6086 ʻêts (in 288 vv). Common lexemes shared across a strong motif (cherubim with wings; cherubim and palms carved on a temple), so thematic rather than verbal.
קֶצֶב (qetseb, H7095, “shape, as if cut out”) is one of the rarest nouns in this unit, standing in only three verses of the Hebrew Bible. One of the others is Jonah 2:6, where the prophet sinks to the qetsev of the mountains, their cut-off bases. Cambridge insists the word here means form and not size. ⚙ The link is lexical, not thematic: nothing in Jonah concerns cherubim, and no quotation is claimed in either direction. What the rare word shows is the semantic range a carver's term carries in Hebrew, a shape defined by where it has been cut.
Jonah 2:6
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H7095 qetseb (in 3 vv). The rarity of the lexeme is the whole basis and it is a real verbal tie; no quotation or literary dependence is claimed in either direction.
Cambridge names Genesis 3:24 as the first mention of the cherubim in Scripture, where they are set with the flame of a sword, and cautions that whether they wielded that weapon “is not certainly to be deduced from the words.” Ellicott traces the same figures forward: they ride beneath the Lord in Psalm 18:10, they bear the throne in Ezekiel 1:10, and in Revelation 4:6-8 the same living creatures join the elders in worship. Cambridge adds that their chief office in Scripture is to be a chariot for Jehovah (Psalm 18:11), “and for this reason they were set up in the most holy place.” ⚙ The move from Genesis to Revelation crosses the Testaments, so no shared Strong's number can be claimed and the Verifier returned no basis for this pair; the link rests on a continuous motif recorded by named commentators, and it is tiered accordingly.
Genesis 3:24 · Psalm 18:10 · Revelation 4:6-8
basis: No Verifier lexeme basis: Genesis and Psalms to Revelation is Hebrew to Greek, where shared Strong's numbers are impossible, and the Verifier returned no candidate for this pair. The recorded basis is a shared motif of winged guardians at throne and sanctuary, named explicitly by Ellicott (Genesis, Psalm 18:10, Ezekiel 1:10, Revelation 4:6-8) and by Cambridge (Genesis 3:24, Psalm 18:11). Never tiered verbal.
Gill proposes that the two olive-wood cherubim may figure “the two witnesses, said to be the two olive trees standing before the God of the whole earth, Revelation 11:3,” and cites Dr. Lightfoot's further suggestion that they resembled the two Testaments. ⚙ This is recorded here because it is in the sources, and flagged because the ground is thin: the connection runs entirely through the English word olive, the Hebrew of 1 Kings says trees of oil rather than zayith (the proper word for the olive, as Pulpit notes at Nehemiah 8:15), the cross-Testament link cannot be verbal in any case, and Gill himself offers an alternative reading of angels in the same sentence. Readers should verify the chain before leaning on it.
Revelation 11:3
basis: No Verifier basis and none possible: Hebrew to Greek admits no shared Strong's number. The connection depends on an English pun between 'olive wood' and Revelation's 'two olive trees'; the Hebrew here is ʻăṣê shemen (H6086 + H8081, trees of oil), not zayith. Recorded as Gill's allegory, flagged as contested.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
Matthew Henry reads this whole building typologically and states it flatly: “Christ is the true Temple. In him dwells all the fulness of the Godhead; in him meet all God's spiritual Israel; through him we have access with confidence to God.” The apostolic ground is explicit. Jesus says of the temple, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up,” and John adds that he spoke of the temple of his body (John 2:19-21); Paul writes that in him all the fulness of the Deity dwells bodily (Colossians 2:9), which is the sentence Henry is quoting. ⚙ The unit before us is the point in the building where that reading has its sharpest edge: this is the room where the presence is to settle, and every detail of it, the measuring, the wings, the gold, is preparation for an occupancy that 1 Kings 8 will describe as a cloud filling the house. Henry then extends the type outward in three more steps, to the believer as a living temple (1 Corinthians 3:16), to the church as the mystical temple, and to heaven as the everlasting temple. This is the ancient and widely-held reading, recorded here in Henry's own words.
John 2:19-21 · Colossians 2:9 · 1 Corinthians 3:16
The cherubim of this unit are guardians whose whole described action is to fill and to overshadow, and 1 Kings 8:6 will bring the ark in beneath their wings. The writer to the Hebrews looks back at exactly that furniture and names it: above the ark were “the cherubim of glory overshadowing the mercy seat” (Hebrews 9:5), in a room the high priest entered once a year, not without blood, and he draws the conclusion that the way into the holy place was not yet made manifest while the first tabernacle was still standing (Hebrews 9:7-8). The same letter then says the way is now open, a new and living way through the veil (Hebrews 10:19-20), and the Gospels report that at the death of Christ the veil of the temple was torn from top to bottom (Matthew 27:51). ⚙ Read with Genesis 3:24, where cherubim first bar the way to the tree of life, the movement is one line: guardians posted at a closed way, guardians stationed over a covered seat, and finally a torn curtain. The Hebrews reading is apostolic and ancient; the Eden-to-oracle arc is widely held among the commentators here, Ellicott and Cambridge both beginning the cherubim's history at the garden.
Hebrews 9:5 · Hebrews 10:19-20 · Matthew 27:51 · Genesis 3:24
⚙ This one is the tool's own and is marked novel accordingly. Barnes gives the plain reason for the material: the tabernacle cherubim were solid gold, and these, being so much larger, were wood merely overlaid with a golden plating. Pulpit adds that the wood chosen was nonetheless the most durable and beautiful available, the oleaster. So the figures that stand nearest the presence are, structurally, common wood, and what the eye meets is gold; JFB records that neither wood nor stone was visible anywhere in the room. ⚙ The temptation is to read this as concealment. It may instead be read as the pattern by which God fills what he has made: ordinary material, chosen for its firmness, entirely covered in glory it did not generate. That is the figure Paul reaches for when he calls believers earthen vessels holding a treasure (2 Corinthians 4:7), and it is the direction Henry takes when he speaks of stones being fitted and made ready for the everlasting temple. I mark this novel because no commentator in this unit draws it: Barnes gives the fact and treats it as practical economy, and the text itself offers no interpretation at all.
2 Corinthians 4:7 · 1 Kings 6:28
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
⚙ Honesty notes for this unit. (1) The interlinear word indices follow the Berean alignment to the English rendering, not the order of the Masoretic clause; the literal renderings above are built from the Hebrew as it stands in the text, so the sequence of words in a literal line will not always match the ascending order of the note keys (this is most visible at 6:23, where waya‘aś precedes baddᵉbîr in the Hebrew, and at 6:29).
(2) The single largest gap in this unit is the one Ellicott names: the form of the cherubim is nowhere stated, and he quotes Josephus that no one can tell or even conjecture what shape they were. Every statement in the commentaries that these figures had human form, stood on their feet, or faced the house is drawn from 2 Chronicles 3:10-13, not from 1 Kings. K&D says of the Chronicler's phrase for their workmanship that its meaning “cannot be more precisely defined.”
(3) Two sources contradict each other on the grammar of 6:27, and the contradiction is preserved rather than resolved: Cambridge calls “the cherubim stretched forth their wings” the frequent Hebrew form of expression, and Pulpit calls that marginal reading “altogether inadmissible.” Gill supplies a third subject, the carvers.
(4) Source defects in the public-domain texts quoted here: the Pulpit excerpt at 6:26 reads “the number ton,” an obvious scanning error for “ten,” and is quoted unaltered because these excerpts are verbatim; Ellicott's entry at 6:23 cites the first mention of the cherubim as “Genesis 4:24,” a misprint for Genesis 3:24 (Cambridge gives the correct reference). The Pulpit entry at 6:29 is capped in the source brief, with roughly 956 further characters not carried over; the excerpt used here falls well inside the available text.
(5) Geneva's note at 6:28, that the Mosaic cherubim had been carried off by Israel's enemies, is a gloss with no support in 1 Kings and is directly contradicted by Benson, who counts four cherubim in the room. Gill's identification of the two cherubim with Revelation's two witnesses, and Lightfoot's with the two Testaments, are recorded in the threads and flagged; they are allegories, not exegesis of this text.
(6) On the wood: the Hebrew is ʻăṣê shemen, trees of oil. Poole and Gill note that this is not necessarily the cultivated olive; Barnes, Pulpit and K&D identify it as the oleaster or wild olive; Pulpit observes that the proper Hebrew word for the olive tree is zayith (Nehemiah 8:15). The species is not certain and is not asserted here.
(7) Barnes' observation that palms, cherubs and flowers resemble Assyrian ornament, and Pulpit's citations of Bahr, Winer and Humboldt on the symbolism of palms and flowers, are nineteenth-century comparative judgments. They are reported with their authors' names attached and are not treated as claims of the text.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)