For the entrance to the inner sanctuary, Solomon constructed doors of olive wood with five-sided doorposts.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’êṯ pe·ṯaḥ had·də·ḇîr ‘ā·śāh dal·ṯō·wṯ šā·men ‘ă·ṣê- ḥă·mi·šîṯ hā·’a·yil mə·zū·zō·wṯ
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Doors
1 Kings 6:31–35 — The Doors. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
For the entrance to the inner sanctuary, Solomon constructed doors of olive wood with five-sided doorposts.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’êṯ pe·ṯaḥ had·də·ḇîr ‘ā·śāh dal·ṯō·wṯ šā·men ‘ă·ṣê- ḥă·mi·šîṯ hā·’a·yil mə·zū·zō·wṯ
The double doors were made of olive wood, and he carved into them cherubim, palm trees, and open flowers and overlaid the cherubim and palm trees with hammered gold.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·šə·tê dal·ṯō·wṯ še·men ‘ă·ṣê- wə·qā·la‘ miq·lə·‘ō·wṯ ‘ă·lê·hem kə·rū·ḇîm wə·ṯi·mō·rō·wṯ ū·p̄ə·ṭū·rê ṣiṣ·ṣîm wə·ṣip·pāh ‘al- hak·kə·rū·ḇîm wə·‘al- hat·ti·mō·rō·wṯ zā·hāḇ way·yā·reḏ ’eṯ- haz·zā·hāḇ
In the same way he made four-sided doorposts of olive wood for the sanctuary entrance.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·ḵên ‘ā·śāh rə·ḇi·‘îṯ mə·zū·zō·wṯ šā·men mê·’êṯ ‘ă·ṣê- ha·hê·ḵāl lə·p̄e·ṯaḥ
The two doors were made of cypress wood, and each had two folding panels.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·šə·tê ḏal·ṯō·wṯ ḇə·rō·wō·šîm ‘ă·ṣê hā·’a·ḥaṯ had·de·leṯ šə·nê gə·lî·lîm ṣə·lā·‘îm haš·šê·nîṯ had·de·leṯ ū·šə·nê gə·lî·lîm qə·lā·‘îm
He carved into them cherubim, palm trees, and open flowers, and he overlaid them with gold hammered evenly over the carvings.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·qā·la‘ kə·rū·ḇîm wə·ṯi·mō·rō·wṯ ū·p̄ə·ṭu·rê ṣiṣ·ṣîm wə·ṣip·pāh zā·hāḇ mə·yuš·šār ‘al- ham·mə·ḥuq·qeh
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
⚙ The unit opens on the one threshold in Israel that mattered most, פֶּתַח הַדְּבִיר, the opening of the shrine, and then hands the reader a sentence that will not resolve. Benson states the textual fact bluntly: the words “of the wall” are not in the Hebrew. Poole offers three readings and decides for none. Barnes reads lintel and post each as a fifth; Cambridge and K&D agree on a doorway of four cubits square in a wall of twenty; the Pulpit Commentary records that the Rabbins made it a pentagon and that Gesenius spent pages of the Thesaurus on the phrase, then rejects the pentagon because Eastern architecture offers no example of one. K&D calls the words obscure outright and still ventures a reading. What every one of them agrees on is what the Hebrew actually says without ambiguity: the wood was ʻăṣê-shemen, trees of oil. Gill takes that as typical of Christ, “the true olive tree.” The grammar supports nothing so far, but the house's own vocabulary does: the cherubim inside this room were carved of the same wood (1 Kings 6:23), and oil is what makes a king and lights the lamp.
⚙ The Hebrew of v. 32 puts a verb next to its own noun, וְקָלַע מִקְלְעוֹת, he carved carvings, and the English loses the doubling. Then it does something the English also loses: it names two operations, not one. Tsâphâh sheets the door with metal; râdad, a Hiphil of a root used in only three verses and meaning to tread down or subdue, drives the gold into the figures. Barnes states the distinction exactly, that these doors were not simply sheeted like the floors but had the gold hammered to fit the forms. Cambridge says the text requires “and he spread the gold” and that this is a different process from the flat plates nailed to walls and floors. K&D, following Rashi, describes the result: the elevations and depressions of the carving were impressed upon the gold leaf and so remained plainly visible. The Geneva marginal note reaches the same end in one clause, that the fashion of the carved work might still appear. Benson adds what none of the technical readings supply, the occasion: on the day of atonement, when the veil was drawn aside for the high priest, these doors were displayed to his view, and otherwise were seldom seen.
⚙ The outer doorway is built וְכֵן, thus, likewise, and the likeness is the point of the two differences. The fraction moves from a fifth to a fourth: Cambridge computes five cubits each way here against four there, a doorway one cubit wider than the one behind it, and Gill turns the extra cubit into a sermon, more entering the one than the other, as more go into the church on earth than into the heavenly glory. That is Gill's inference and not the text's claim, and it rests on a measurement the commentators cannot agree about. The timber changes too. JFB sets the contrast in a line: solid olive at the most holy place, cypress at the holy place with the sides still of olive. K&D supplies the engineering reason, that cypress is lighter and therefore less likely to sink on its hinges, and Barnes notes that the weight of such doors made it inconvenient to open the whole leaf every time. Hence the folding: each door divided again into two גְּלִילִים, turning-leaves. Whether they folded side to side or top to bottom is unresolved in the brief itself, K&D arguing for halves so that a priest could open only the lower, the Pulpit Commentary calling a vertical division more natural. And the Hebrew of v. 34 carries a word that is probably a mistake: קְלָעִים, slings, which both K&D and the Pulpit Commentary judge a copyist's slip for צְלָעִים, ribs, caught from the carving verb in the verses on either side.
⚙ The unit ends on a Pual participle, מְיֻשָּׁר, made straight, and on a second Pual participle naming what it was made straight upon, הַמְּחֻקֶּה, the engraved thing, from a root the writer has not used until now. Cambridge marks the change of vocabulary and follows the RV in rendering it graven work, and argues from the clause that the embossed and carved portions were covered but not the whole surface of the doors. The Pulpit Commentary takes the opposite view on the extent of gilding, reasoning from v. 22 that all the house blazed with gold, and K&D argues the same against Thenius at length, holding that kol-habbayit ʻad-tom in v. 22 will not bear a partial gilding. The brief preserves the disagreement and does not settle it. What is not in dispute is the mechanics: the gold was beaten thin and laid so that it fitted closely to the figures, or in the Pulpit Commentary's literal phrase, made straight upon the engraved work, close to all the uneven and indented surface. And the figures themselves repeat: cherubim, palms, burst-open blossoms, the same three on both doors, which the Pulpit Commentary treats as proof in itself that they were significant and not ornament.
⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested against the text. Five verses of joinery, and the whole of it is about a way in. Two openings are named with the same noun, pethach, and the second is deliberately the wider one: the nearer you come to the ark, the narrower the door, until the last door of all opens once a year for one man. Israel is being taught the shape of access by carpentry. On both doors stand the cherubim, the figures that have guarded a way since Genesis 3:24, and beside them palms and blossoms burst open, the garden vocabulary of a place no one can re-enter. Here the guardians are cut into the door itself, which is to say that the sentries are now part of the thing that swings. And then the gold. The text does not say the carving was smoothed away under the metal; it says the opposite, in two participles: the gold was beaten down (râdad, a verb of subduing) and made straight (yâshar) upon what had been engraved. Glory took the shape of the cut. That is the grammar, and it is where this reading stops making claims and starts making one: the God of this house does not gild over the figure, he conforms the glory to it. What the reading cannot do is tell you how wide the door was. A fifth of what, and of which dimension, no commentator in this brief can establish, and one word in v. 34 is probably a scribal slip. The line below is machine synthesis, not Scripture.
The gold was not laid over the carving to smooth it out; it was driven down until the figure underneath decided the shape of the glory above.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The program on these doors is not invented for them. 1 Kings 6:18 has the cedar of the house carved with gourds and open flowers, using miqlaʻath and pâṭar and tsîyts; 1 Kings 6:29 has the walls round about carved with cherubim, palms and open flowers, using qâlaʻ, kᵉrûwb and tsîyts. The Verifier confirms both sets of shared lexemes. The doors therefore carry the wall's own vocabulary: what is on the room is on the way into the room. Gill makes the link explicitly at v. 32, referring the carvings back to 1 Kings 6:29.
1 Kings 6:18 · 1 Kings 6:29
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H4734 miqlaʻath (rare, in 4 vv) and H7049 qâlaʻ (rare, in 7 vv), with H6362 pâṭar (in 8 vv), H6731 tsîyts (in 15 vv) and H3742 kᵉrûwb (in 66 vv). Same author, same chapter, same technical vocabulary; a verbal link within one composition, not a quotation of another book
מִקְלְעוֹת (H4734, a sculpture probably in bas-relief) stands in only four verses of the canon, and three of them are Solomon's temple: the cedar of 1 Kings 6:18, the doors here, and the carved panels of the bronze stands at 1 Kings 7:31. The Verifier records the shared lexeme with 7:31. The practical conclusion is small and worth stating: this is close to a trade term belonging to one building project, which is why its precise technique (relief, and how deep) is recoverable only from context.
1 Kings 7:31
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H4734 miqlaʻath, rare (in 4 vv); a genuine verbal link, no quotation claimed
The verb that drives the gold into the carving, וַיָּרֶד (H7286 râdad), appears in only three verses. One is Isaiah 45:1, where the LORD takes Cyrus by the right hand to subdue nations before him and to open דְּלָתַיִם, doors, that gates may not be shut; another is Psalm 144:2, of a people subdued. The Verifier records both the rare râdad and the shared deleth with Isaiah 45:1. ⚙ This is a real verbal overlap, but the senses run apart: here the object is metal, there it is peoples, and Isaiah 45 is prophecy about an empire, not a comment on temple doors. Tiered structural, not verbal, on purpose: the connection worth keeping is that the same root covers hammering a thing into shape and breaking a thing into submission, and that both Isaiah 45 and this unit are about doors being opened by the LORD's chosen builder.
Isaiah 45:1 · Psalm 144:2
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H7286 râdad (rare, in 3 vv) and H1817 deleth (in 78 vv). The lexemes are shared and rare, but the sense diverges (metalwork here, subjugation there), so the claim is deliberately downgraded to a motif link about doors and the LORD's opening of them
הַמְּחֻקֶּה (H2707 châqâh, to carve) is a rare root, four verses in all. Ezekiel 8:10 uses it of what the prophet sees on the wall inside this same house: every form of creeping thing and detestable beast, portrayed all around. The Verifier records the shared lexeme. ⚙ The vocabulary of Solomon's gilded cherubim returns, in the same building, for idols in a dark room. Nothing in either text makes the allusion explicit; what the shared rare root supplies is the category, engraved figures on the surfaces of the LORD's house, and the reader is left to feel the difference between figures under gold and figures in the dark.
Ezekiel 8:10
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H2707 châqâh, rare (in 4 vv). The lexeme link is real and rare; the ironic reading built on it is machine synthesis, so the tier stays structural rather than claiming quotation
The Verifier links this unit to 1 Samuel 17:49 (David slinging the stone), Judges 20:16 (the left-handed Benjamites who could sling at a hair), Jeremiah 10:18 and 1 Samuel 25:29 (the soul of the LORD's enemies slung out as from the hollow of a sling), all through H7049 qâlaʻ, rare at seven verses, and H7050 qelaʻ, a sling. The same number in this unit means to carve. ⚙ The standard lexica generally treat these as two distinct roots that happen to share consonants, and Strong's files them together; Strong's own headword here is “to sling.” There is a further complication: the קְלָעִים of v. 34 that helps generate this link is judged by K&D and the Pulpit Commentary to be a copyist's error for צְלָעִים. Flagged, not because the Verifier is wrong about the numbers, but because the numbers here may be joining two unrelated words across a probable scribal slip. No theological weight should be hung on it.
1 Samuel 17:49 · Judges 20:16 · 1 Samuel 25:29
basis: Verifier: shared Strong's H7049 qâlaʻ (in 7 vv) and H7050 qelaʻ (in 22 vv). Flagged because the shared number covers two probably distinct roots (to sling / to carve), and because one of the linking words in v. 34 is judged textually corrupt by K&D and the Pulpit Commentary
This unit describes what stood in front of the Most Holy Place and, as K&D and the Pulpit Commentary both insist, it was not the only barrier: 2 Chronicles 3:14 records the curtain, which K&D argues hung within the doors so that even when they were opened outward for the high priest the priests in the Holy Place could not look in. Benson describes that same moment from the high priest's side. Hebrews 9:3 and 9:8 read the arrangement as deliberate instruction, that the way into the holy places was not yet disclosed while the first tent stood; Matthew 27:51 reports the curtain torn from top to bottom. ⚙ This is a cross-Testament link and cannot be verbal: the Greek of Hebrews shares no Strong's number with the Hebrew of 1 Kings, and Hebrews never cites this passage. What it shares is the architecture and the argument about access.
2 Chronicles 3:14 · Hebrews 9:3 · Matthew 27:51
basis: Cross-Testament (Hebrew to Greek), so no shared Strong's lexeme is possible and no verbal tier is claimed. The basis is the shared architecture of the inner barrier, sourced in this brief from K&D and the Pulpit Commentary on the curtain of 2 Chronicles 3:14 standing behind these doors
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
Gill reads the two-leaved door of olive wood at the entrance of the oracle as typical of Christ, the door into the church above and below, the way to heaven and eternal life, the true olive tree. Henry, writing over this whole section, says the same in another key: Christ is the true Temple, in whom all the fulness of the Godhead dwells, and through whom we have access with confidence to God. ⚙ The texts they are reading toward are John 10:9, where Jesus says he is the door and that whoever enters through him will be saved, and Hebrews 10:19-20, where the way into the holy places is called new and living and is identified with his flesh. The point the Hebrew supplies and the English hides is that this door was built of the anointing-wood, ʻăṣê-shemen, trees of oil, the same timber as the cherubim within.
John 10:9 · Hebrews 10:19-20 · 1 Kings 6:31
Since Genesis 3:24 the cherubim have stood at a door with a flaming sword to guard the way to the tree of life. Solomon's craftsmen put them on the veil's successors: here they are cut into the leaves of both doors, with palms and blossoms burst open beside them. ⚙ The synthesis offered here is that the guardians have been carved into the hinge-work itself, so that the figures who barred the garden now travel with the panel that swings, and that this is why the tearing of the curtain in Matthew 27:51 is reported as a direction (from top to bottom) rather than as a mere event. The cherubim-and-garden reading of temple ornament is old and widely held; this specific inference about the door as the thing that moves is the machine's own and should be weighed as such.
Genesis 3:24 · Exodus 26:31 · Matthew 27:51
The last clause of the unit says the gold was made straight (yâshar, Pual) upon the engraved thing (châqâh, Pual). K&D describes the technique: beaten thin and laid so that the plate fitted closely to the figures. The Geneva note gives the purpose in a clause, that the fashion of the carved work might still appear. ⚙ Read toward the incarnation, this is the grammar of Colossians 2:9 and John 1:14: the fulness does not abolish the form it covers, it takes its shape, and the figure underneath remains visible through the glory. Offered as a reading of the mechanics, not as a claim that the writer of 1 Kings intended it; the ancient sources in this brief go as far as saying the temple is typical of Christ (Henry, Gill) and no further on this clause.
John 1:14 · Colossians 2:9
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
⚙ Honesty notes for this unit. (1) The interlinear word order in the brief follows the Berean alignment to English, not the Hebrew sequence; at 6:31 the Hebrew runs הָאַיִל מְזוּזוֹת חֲמִשִׁית, and the literal rendering above restores that order. (2) Two words in this unit have no English gloss in the Berean interlinear at all: הָאַיִל at 6:31 (marked only with a placeholder) and קְלָעִים at 6:34. Both are real words in the Hebrew text and the English reader never meets them. (3) The measurement clauses at 6:31 and 6:33 are the acknowledged crux. Benson states that “of the wall” is not in the Hebrew; K&D calls the words obscure and notes that Gesenius filled pages with them; Poole, Barnes, Cambridge, the Pulpit Commentary and K&D between them offer at least four incompatible readings. Nothing in this synthesis depends on any one of them being right. (4) קְלָעִים (slings) at 6:34 is judged a copyist's error for צְלָעִים (ribs) by both K&D and the Pulpit Commentary; the Verifier's links from this unit to the sling passages partly rest on it, which is why that thread is flagged. (5) בְרוֹשִׁים at 6:34 is a conifer of uncertain identity: Strong's itself prints a question mark, AV has fir, Barnes argues juniper, BSB prints cypress. (6) The extent of the gilding is disputed within the brief: Cambridge holds that only the embossed and carved portions were covered, while the Pulpit Commentary and K&D argue from 1 Kings 6:22 that the whole was. (7) The curtain of 2 Chronicles 3:14 is not mentioned in 1 Kings; its relation to these doors is reconstruction, argued by K&D and the Pulpit Commentary. (8) Matthew Henry's note is a single block on 1 Kings 6:15-38 and is repeated by the source at every verse of this unit, so its appearance at 6:35 is not a comment on that verse in particular. (9) All commentary excerpts are verbatim public-domain text resolved from anchors; every sentence marked ⚙ is fallible machine synthesis and carries no authority.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)