The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

1 Kings8:62–66

Sacrifices of Dedication

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

1 Kings 8:62–66 — Sacrifices of Dedication. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

62

Then the king and all Israel with him offered sacrifices before the LORD.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·ham·me·leḵ wə·ḵāl yiś·rā·’êl ‘im·mōw zō·ḇə·ḥîm ze·ḇaḥ lip̄·nê Yah·weh

Word by word8 · parsed
וְֽהַמֶּ֔לֶךְwə·ham·me·leḵThen the kingH4428
√ melek — a kingConjunctive waw, ArticleNounmasculine singular
melek: king Solomon is named by office, not by name, for the whole of v. 62. The dedication is an act of the crown before it is an act of a man.
וְכָל־wə·ḵāland allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeConjunctive wawNounmasculine singular construct
יִשְׂרָאֵ֖לyiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
עִמּ֑וֹ‘im·mōwwith himH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iPrepositionthird person masculine singular
זֹבְחִ֥יםzō·ḇə·ḥîmofferedH2076
√ zâbach — to slaughter an animal (usually in sacrifice)VerbQalParticiplemasculine plural
zâbach: to slaughter in sacrifice (Qal participle) The participle is durative: this is not one moment but a sustained slaughtering that will run through the fourteen days of v. 65. JFB reads the opening offering as the burnt offering answered by fire from heaven in 2 Chronicles 7:1; 1 Kings itself does not record the fire, and the Hebrew here says only that king and people were sacrificing.
זֶ֖בַחze·ḇaḥsacrificesH2077
√ zebach — properly, a slaughter, iNounmasculine singular
zebach: a sacrifice, properly a slaughter A common word (153 verses) that Leviticus reserves for the offerings whose flesh is eaten, which is why v. 63 can specify shelamim and v. 65 can turn the whole thing into a feast. Slaughter and supper are the same word here.
לִפְנֵ֥יlip̄·nêbeforeH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNouncommon plural construct
יְהוָֽה׃Yah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
YHWH: the covenant Name The divine Name closes the verse, as it closes vv. 64 and 65. Solomon's prayer asked that the Name dwell here; the narrative now simply reports that the nation sacrifices to that face.
63

And Solomon offered as peace offerings to the LORD 22,000 oxen and 120,000 sheep. So the king and all the Israelites dedicated the house of the LORD.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

šə·lō·mōh ’êṯ way·yiz·baḥ ze·ḇaḥ haš·šə·lā·mîm ’ă·šer zā·ḇaḥ Yah·weh ‘eś·rîm ū·šə·na·yim ’e·lep̄ bā·qār mê·’āh wə·‘eś·rîm ’ā·lep̄ wə·ṣōn ham·me·leḵ wə·ḵāl bə·nê yiś·rā·’êl way·yaḥ·nə·ḵū ’eṯ- bêṯ Yah·weh

Word by word24 · parsed
שְׁלֹמֹ֗הšə·lō·mōhAnd SolomonH8010
√ Shᵉlômôh — Shelomah, David's successorNounpropermasculine singular
אֵ֣ת’êṯH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
וַיִּזְבַּ֣חway·yiz·baḥoffered asH2076
√ zâbach — to slaughter an animal (usually in sacrifice)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
zâbach: to slaughter in sacrifice (Qal consecutive imperfect) The narrative verb form that drives Hebrew prose forward: “and then he sacrificed.” After the long static prayer of ch. 8, the wayyiqtol chain restarts the story.
זֶ֣בַחze·ḇaḥvvvH2077
√ zebach — properly, a slaughter, iNounmasculine singular construct
הַשְּׁלָמִים֮haš·šə·lā·mîmpeace offeringsH8002
√ shelem — properly, requital, iArticleNounmasculine plural
shelem: peace offering, requital Of the whole sacrificial vocabulary this is the only offering shared three ways, between altar, priest and worshipper. That is why the same verse can report a slaughter on this scale and v. 65 can call the result a feast. Cambridge grounds the arithmetic in Leviticus 7:15; K&D adds that under Leviticus 1 and 3 any Israelite, not only a priest, could slaughter and flay, which dissolves the objection that the priesthood could not have processed the numbers.
אֲשֶׁ֣ר’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
זָבַ֣חzā·ḇaḥH2076
√ zâbach — to slaughter an animal (usually in sacrifice)VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
לַיהוָה֒Yah·wehto the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
עֶשְׂרִ֤ים‘eś·rîm22,000 {}H6242
√ ʻesrîym — twentyNumbercommon plural
ʻesrîym: twenty Part of the compound numeral “twenty and two thousand.” Ellicott records that the figure is identical in Chronicles and in Josephus, so it cannot be dismissed as a scribal slip; Cambridge notes that Josephus lowers the oxen to twelve thousand while keeping the sheep at 120,000.
וּשְׁנַ֙יִם֙ū·šə·na·yim. . .H8147
√ shᵉnayim — twoConjunctive wawNumbermd
אֶ֔לֶף’e·lep̄. . .H505
√ ʼeleph — hence (the ox's head being the first letter of the alphabet, and this eventually used as a numeral) a thousandNumbermasculine singular
בָּקָ֗רbā·qāroxenH1241
√ bâqâr — beef cattle or an animal of the ox family of either gender (as used for plowing)Nounmasculine singular
bâqâr: beef cattle, the plow ox The ox of the yoke. Twenty-two thousand of these is a herd withdrawn from the fields at the height of the agricultural year, which is part of what the number is saying.
מֵאָ֥הmê·’āhand 120,000H3967
√ mêʼâh — a hundredNumberfeminine singular
וְעֶשְׂרִ֖יםwə·‘eś·rîm. . .H6242
√ ʻesrîym — twentyConjunctive wawNumbercommon plural
אָ֑לֶף’ā·lep̄. . .H505
√ ʼeleph — hence (the ox's head being the first letter of the alphabet, and this eventually used as a numeral) a thousandNumbermasculine singular
וְצֹ֕אןwə·ṣōnsheepH6629
√ tsôʼn — a collective name for a flock (of sheep or goats)Conjunctive wawNouncommon singular
tsôʼn: flock of sheep or goats A collective singular in Hebrew (wə·ṣōn), one word for the whole 120,000. Hebrew counts flocks, not sheep.
הַמֶּ֖לֶךְham·me·leḵSo the kingH4428
√ melek — a kingArticleNounmasculine singular
וְכָל־wə·ḵāland allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeConjunctive wawNounmasculine singular construct
בְּנֵ֥יbə·nêthe IsraelitesH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural construct
bên: son, in the widest sense bᵉnê Yisrāʼêl, “sons of Israel,” the covenant designation. The BSB's “the Israelites” is accurate and loses the family language: the house is dedicated by the descendants of the man whose name the nation carries.
יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃yiś·rā·’êl. . .H3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
וַֽיַּחְנְכוּ֙way·yaḥ·nə·ḵūdedicatedH2596
√ chânak — properly, to narrowConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
chânak: to dedicate, properly to narrow or train Rare: four verses in the Hebrew Bible. Its other occurrences are Deuteronomy 20:5, where a man is excused from war until he has dedicated his new house, and Proverbs 22:6, where a child is trained in the way he should go. The root idea behind the gloss “to narrow” is initiation into use, putting a thing into the channel it is meant to run in. The noun form stands behind Hanukkah. Benson and Poole both gloss it exactly this way: began to set it apart for the work and service of God.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
בֵּ֣יתbêṯthe houseH1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcNounmasculine singular construct
bayith: house The object of the rare verb is bêṯ YHWH, the house of YHWH, the same construct chain that has run through the whole chapter. Geneva's marginal note narrows the place of dedication further: before the oracle where the ark was.
יְהוָ֔הYah·wehof the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
64

On that same day the king consecrated the middle of the courtyard in front of the house of the LORD, and there he offered the burnt offerings, the grain offerings, and the fat of the peace offerings, since the bronze altar before the LORD was too small to contain all these offerings.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ha·hū bay·yō·wm ham·me·leḵ ’eṯ- qid·daš tō·wḵ he·ḥā·ṣêr ’ă·šer lip̄·nê ḇêṯ- Yah·weh kî- šām ’eṯ- ‘ā·śāh hā·‘ō·lāh wə·’eṯ- ham·min·ḥāh wə·’êṯ ḥel·ḇê haš·šə·lā·mîm kî- han·nə·ḥō·šeṯ ’ă·šer miz·baḥ lip̄·nê Yah·weh qā·ṭōn mê·hā·ḵîl ’eṯ- hā·‘ō·lāh wə·’eṯ- ham·min·ḥāh wə·’êṯ ḥel·ḇê haš·šə·lā·mîm

Word by word36 · parsed
הַה֗וּאha·hūOn that sameH1931
√ hûwʼ — he (she or it)ArticlePronounthird person masculine singular
בַּיּ֣וֹםbay·yō·wmdayH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)Preposition-b, ArticleNounmasculine singular
הַמֶּ֜לֶךְham·me·leḵthe kingH4428
√ melek — a kingArticleNounmasculine singular
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
קִדַּ֨שׁqid·dašconsecratedH6942
√ qâdash — to be (causatively, make, pronounce or observe as) clean (ceremonially or morally)VerbPielPerfectthird person masculine singular
qâdash: to make holy (Piel) The intensive stem used of sanctifying the tabernacle, the altar and Aaron's sons. Here it is applied to open pavement, and only for a season. Poole draws the distinction precisely: the great altar was consecrated for lasting and perpetual use, this court only for the present occasion, after which the temporary altars were demolished.
תּ֣וֹךְtō·wḵthe middleH8432
√ tâvek — a bisection, iNounmasculine singular construct
tâvek: the middle, a bisection Whether this is a section of the court or the entire court is the interpretive crux of the verse. Barnes takes it as the whole area, which thus became one huge altar; Pulpit allows either that, or temporary altars erected across the space; Benson and Poole assume the court of the priests specifically.
הֶחָצֵ֗רhe·ḥā·ṣêrof the courtyardH2691
√ châtsêr — a yard (as inclosed by a fence)ArticleNouncommon singular
châtsêr: a yard enclosed by a fence The word for the courtyard is the same used of the tabernacle enclosure. What is sanctified is an enclosure, not a structure.
אֲשֶׁר֙’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
לִפְנֵ֣יlip̄·nêin frontH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNouncommon plural construct
בֵית־ḇêṯ-of the houseH1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcNounmasculine singular construct
יְהוָ֔הYah·wehof the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
כִּי־kî-andH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
שָׁ֗םšāmthereH8033
√ shâm — there (transferring to time) thenAdverb
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
עָ֣שָׂה‘ā·śāhhe offeredH6213
√ ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest applicationVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
הָֽעֹלָה֙hā·‘ō·lāhthe burnt offeringsH5930
√ ʻôlâh — a step or (collectively, stairs, as ascending)ArticleNounfeminine singular
ʻôlâh: burnt offering, from a root meaning to ascend Strong's root sense is “a step, stairs, as ascending”: the ʻolah is the offering that goes wholly up. It is the one offering nothing is eaten from, which is exactly why the altar's capacity became the constraint. Note that Hebrew has the singular generic hā‘ōlāh, as Pulpit observes, not a plural.
וְאֶת־wə·’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
הַמִּנְחָ֔הham·min·ḥāhthe grain offeringsH4503
√ minchâh — a donationArticleNounfeminine singular
minchâh: a donation, gift, grain offering Cambridge flags the translation history: the older English “meat offering” now misleads, since these were flour with oil and incense (Leviticus 2:4-7), and the Revised Version moved to “meal offering.” The root sense is tribute, a gift brought to a superior.
וְאֵ֖תwə·’êṯH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
חֶלְבֵ֣יḥel·ḇêand the fatH2459
√ cheleb — fat, whether literally or figurativelyNounmasculine plural construct
cheleb: fat Leviticus 3 reserves the fat to YHWH absolutely. Its presence here explains how 142,000 animals and one altar can stand in the same sentence: only the fat of the shelamim was burned, and even that overwhelmed the bronze.
הַשְּׁלָמִ֑יםhaš·šə·lā·mîmof the peace offeringsH8002
√ shelem — properly, requital, iArticleNounmasculine plural
כִּֽי־kî-sinceH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
הַנְּחֹ֙שֶׁת֙han·nə·ḥō·šeṯthe bronzeH5178
√ nᵉchôsheth — copper, hence, something made of that metal, iArticleNounfeminine singular
nᵉchôsheth: copper, bronze The altar of Exodus 27 and of 2 Chronicles 4:1, twenty cubits square. Pulpit does the arithmetic and notes the irony: even a surface of roughly a hundred square yards was inadequate.
אֲשֶׁ֣ר’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
מִזְבַּ֤חmiz·baḥaltarH4196
√ mizbêach — an altarNounmasculine singular construct
לִפְנֵ֣יlip̄·nêbeforeH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNouncommon plural construct
יְהוָ֔הYah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
קָטֹ֗ןqā·ṭōnwas too smallH6996
√ qâṭân — abbreviated, iAdjectivemasculine singular
qâṭân: small, abbreviated The narrative's own verdict, and the hinge of the verse. The one fixed, divinely specified altar is declared small. That word, and not the numbers, is where the theological weight of this verse sits.
מֵֽהָכִיל֙mê·hā·ḵîlto containH3557
√ kûwl — properly, to keep inPreposition-mVerbHifilInfinitive construct
kûwl: to hold in, contain (Hiphil infinitive) The same root Solomon used in v. 27 of this chapter when he said the heavens cannot contain God. Here the altar cannot contain the offering. The chapter twice measures a vessel against what it must hold and finds it too small.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
הָעֹלָ֣הhā·‘ō·lāh[all these offerings]H5930
√ ʻôlâh — a step or (collectively, stairs, as ascending)ArticleNounfeminine singular
וְאֶת־wə·’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
הַמִּנְחָ֔הham·min·ḥāhH4503
√ minchâh — a donationArticleNounfeminine singular
וְאֵ֖תwə·’êṯH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
חֶלְבֵ֥יḥel·ḇêH2459
√ cheleb — fat, whether literally or figurativelyNounmasculine plural construct
הַשְּׁלָמִֽים׃haš·šə·lā·mîm. . .H8002
√ shelem — properly, requital, iArticleNounmasculine plural
65

So at that time Solomon and all Israel with him—a great assembly of people from Lebo-hamath to the Brook of Egypt—kept the feast before the LORD our God for seven days and seven more days—fourteen days in all.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ha·hî ’eṯ- ḇā·‘êṯ- šə·lō·mōh wə·ḵāl yiś·rā·’êl ‘im·mōw gā·ḏō·wl qā·hāl mil·lə·ḇō·w ḥă·māṯ ‘aḏ- na·ḥal miṣ·ra·yim way·ya·‘aś he·ḥāḡ lip̄·nê Yah·weh ’ĕ·lō·hê·nū šiḇ·‘aṯ yā·mîm wə·šiḇ·‘aṯ yā·mîm ’ar·bā·‘āh ‘ā·śār yō·wm

Word by word26 · parsed
הַהִ֣יא׀ha·hîSo at thatH1931
√ hûwʼ — he (she or it)ArticlePronounthird person feminine singular
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
בָֽעֵת־ḇā·‘êṯ-timeH6256
√ ʻêth — time, especially (adverb with preposition) now, when, etcPreposition-b, ArticleNouncommon singular
שְׁלֹמֹ֣הšə·lō·mōhSolomonH8010
√ Shᵉlômôh — Shelomah, David's successorNounpropermasculine singular
וְכָל־wə·ḵāland allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeConjunctive wawNounmasculine singular construct
יִשְׂרָאֵ֣לyiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
עִמּוֹ֩‘im·mōwwith himH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iPrepositionthird person masculine singular
גָּד֜וֹלgā·ḏō·wla greatH1419
√ gâdôwl — great (in any sense)Adjectivemasculine singular
קָהָ֨לqā·hālassembly of peopleH6951
√ qâhâl — assemblage (usually concretely)Nounmasculine singular
qâhâl: assemblage, congregation Not a crowd but a convoked body. The geography that follows defines it: this qahal is coextensive with the land itself, north border to south border, which is the narrator's way of saying that nothing of Israel was left out of this day.
מִלְּב֥וֹאmil·lə·ḇō·wvvvH935
√ bôwʼ — to go or come (in a wide variety of applications)Preposition-mVerbQalInfinitive construct
bôwʼ: to come, to enter (Qal infinitive construct) mil·lə·ḇō·w Ḥămāṯ, “from the entering in of Hamath”: an infinitive used as a place name, the approach or entrance to Hamath. Ellicott identifies it with the great valley between Lebanon and Anti-Lebanon, the road by which invasion would later come.
חֲמָ֣ת׀ḥă·māṯfrom Lebo-hamathH2574
√ Chămâth — Chamath, a place in SyriaNounproperfeminine singular
עַד־‘aḏ-toH5704
√ ʻad — as far (or long, or much) as, whether of space (even unto) or time (during, while, until) or degree (equally with)Preposition
נַ֣חַלna·ḥalthe BrookH5158
√ nachal — a stream, especially a winter torrentNounmasculine singular construct
nachal: a stream, especially a winter torrent The wadi, dry most of the year. Paired with Lebo-hamath it forms the standard merism of the promised territory (Numbers 34:8; Joshua 13:5), so the verse is quietly reporting that the land promise stands fulfilled on this one day.
מִצְרַ֗יִםmiṣ·ra·yimof EgyptH4714
√ Mitsrayim — Mitsrajim, iNounproperfeminine singular
וַיַּ֣עַשׂway·ya·‘aśkeptH6213
√ ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest applicationConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
הֶחָ֡גhe·ḥāḡthe feastH2282
√ chag — a festival, or a victim thereforArticleNounmasculine singular
chag: a festival, or the victim for it A relatively uncommon word (55 verses), and the technical term for the three pilgrimage feasts. Strong's notes it can mean the festal victim as well as the festival: the slaughter of v. 63 and the celebration of v. 65 are the same noun.
לִפְנֵי֙lip̄·nêbeforeH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNouncommon plural construct
יְהוָ֣הYah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
אֱלֹהֵ֔ינוּ’ĕ·lō·hê·nūour GodH430
√ ʼĕlôhîym — gods in the ordinary senseNounmasculine plural constructfirst person common plural
ʼĕlôhîym: God “Before YHWH our God”: a first person plural suffix breaking into third person narrative. Cambridge judges the last two words an editorial addition unlikely to stand in the original narrative. Whoever set them there, the effect is that the narrator momentarily stands inside the assembly he is describing.
שִׁבְעַ֥תšiḇ·‘aṯfor sevenH7651
√ shebaʻ — seven (as the sacred full one)Numbermasculine singular construct
shebaʻ: seven, the sacred full number Doubled, then summed: seven days and seven days, fourteen days. Geneva, Poole, Benson, JFB, Cambridge and K&D all read the doubling as two distinct observances, the dedication and Tabernacles; Poole, Benson and JFB further argue the odd phrasing signals that the fourteen were not consecutive, since the Day of Atonement fell on the tenth of the month.
יָמִ֖יםyā·mîmdaysH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)Nounmasculine plural
וְשִׁבְעַ֣תwə·šiḇ·‘aṯand seven [more]H7651
√ shebaʻ — seven (as the sacred full one)Conjunctive wawNumbermasculine singular construct
יָמִ֑יםyā·mîmdaysH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)Nounmasculine plural
אַרְבָּעָ֥ה’ar·bā·‘āhfourteenH702
√ ʼarbaʻ — fourNumbermasculine singular
ʼarbaʻ: four With ‘āśār, “fourteen.” The narrator adds the sum after giving the parts, which is what makes the phrasing so strange and so debated: he wants both the two sevens and the single fourteen on the page.
עָשָׂ֖ר‘ā·śār. . .H6240
√ ʻâsâr — ten (only in combination), iNumbermasculine singular
יֽוֹם׃yō·wmdays in allH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)Nounmasculine singular
yôwm: day Singular after the numeral, as Hebrew counts: “fourteen day.” The English plural is required; the Hebrew idiom is not a mistake.
66

On the fifteenth day Solomon sent the people away. So they blessed the king and went home, joyful and glad in heart for all the good things that the LORD had done for His servant David and for His people Israel.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

haš·šə·mî·nî bay·yō·wm hā·‘ām šil·laḥ ’eṯ- way·ḇā·ră·ḵū ’eṯ- ham·me·leḵ way·yê·lə·ḵū lə·’ā·ho·lê·hem śə·mê·ḥîm wə·ṭō·w·ḇê lêḇ ‘al kāl- haṭ·ṭō·w·ḇāh ’ă·šer Yah·weh ‘ā·śāh ‘aḇ·dōw lə·ḏā·wiḏ ‘am·mōw ū·lə·yiś·rā·’êl

Word by word23 · parsed
הַשְּׁמִינִי֙haš·šə·mî·nîOn the [fifteenth]H8066
√ shᵉmîynîy — eightArticleNumberordinal masculine singular
shᵉmîynîy: eighth A relatively rare ordinal (27 verses). In Leviticus 23:36 the eighth day is the atzereth, the closing assembly of Tabernacles, a day added after the seven. The chapter that has counted seven and seven ends on the day that belongs to neither week.
בַּיּ֤וֹםbay·yō·wmdayH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)Preposition-b, ArticleNounmasculine singular
הָעָ֔םhā·‘ām[Solomon] sent the peopleH5971
√ ʻam — a people (as a congregated unit)ArticleNounmasculine singular
שִׁלַּ֣חšil·laḥawayH7971
√ shâlach — to send away, for, or out (in a great variety of applications)VerbPielPerfectthird person masculine singular
shâlach: to send away (Piel) The intensive stem: a formal dismissal, the act of a sovereign releasing an assembly. It is the same verb used of releasing Israel from Egypt, and it closes the dedication the way a benediction closes a service.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
וַֽיְבָרֲכ֖וּway·ḇā·ră·ḵūSo they blessedH1288
√ bârak — to kneelConjunctive wawVerbPielConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
bârak: to kneel, to bless (Piel) Subjects and object are reversed from 8:14, where the king blessed the congregation. Here the congregation blesses the king. The root's literal sense, to kneel, keeps a posture inside the word even when the usage is a courtesy.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
הַמֶּ֑לֶךְham·me·leḵthe kingH4428
√ melek — a kingArticleNounmasculine singular
וַיֵּלְכ֣וּway·yê·lə·ḵūand wentH1980
√ hâlak — to walk (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
לְאָהֳלֵיהֶ֗םlə·’ā·ho·lê·hemhomeH168
√ ʼôhel — a tent (as clearly conspicuous from a distance)Preposition-lNounmasculine plural constructthird person masculine plural
ʼôhel: a tent, conspicuous from a distance The nation that has just built a permanent house goes back to a word for a portable one. The ʼohel moʻed, the tent of meeting, is the same noun: the dwelling God has just exchanged for a temple is the word the people still use for their own homes.
שְׂמֵחִים֙śə·mê·ḥîmjoyfulH8056
√ sâmêach — blithe or gleefulAdjectivemasculine plural
sâmêach: blithe, gleeful An adjective, not a verb: they went out being joyful. Deuteronomy 16:14-15 commands exactly this at the feast of Tabernacles, that Israel shall be nothing but joyful. The narrative reports obedience to a command it never quotes.
וְט֣וֹבֵיwə·ṭō·w·ḇêand gladH2896
√ ṭôwb — good (as an adjective) in the widest senseConjunctive wawAdjectivemasculine plural construct
לֵ֔בlêḇin heartH3820
√ lêb — the heartNounmasculine singular
lêb: the heart The seat of will and mind, not sentiment. “Good of heart” is a settled condition, not a mood, which is why Henry can turn it straight into an instruction about how to leave public worship.
עַ֣ל‘alforH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
כָּל־kāl-allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
הַטּוֹבָ֗הhaṭ·ṭō·w·ḇāhthe good thingsH2896
√ ṭôwb — good (as an adjective) in the widest senseArticleNounfeminine singular
ṭôwb: good, in the widest sense The noun form of the adjective in “good of heart,” four words earlier. One root, twice, joins the people's inward state to YHWH's outward acts: the good in them answers the good done by him.
אֲשֶׁ֨ר’ă·šerthatH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
יְהוָה֙Yah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
עָשָׂ֤ה‘ā·śāhhad doneH6213
√ ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest applicationVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
ʻâsâh: to do, to make The same verb Solomon governed in vv. 64 and 65 (he offered, he kept) now has YHWH as its subject. The chapter's last finite verb about God is simply that he did.
עַבְדּ֔וֹ‘aḇ·dōwfor His servantH5650
√ ʻebed — a servantNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
ʻebed: a servant David is named servant, Israel is named people, and both are possessed by the suffix “his.” K&D observes why David appears at the end at all: the finished house is the discharge of the promise made to him, so the people's joy runs back past Solomon to a covenant made with a dead king.
לְדָוִ֣דlə·ḏā·wiḏDavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JessePreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
Dâvid: beloved The verse ends the dedication by naming, not the builder, but his father. Pulpit calls David the real founder of the temple, Solomon having entered into his labours.
עַמּֽוֹ׃‘am·mōwand for His peopleH5971
√ ʻam — a people (as a congregated unit)Nounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
וּלְיִשְׂרָאֵ֖לū·lə·yiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobConjunctive waw, Preposition-lNounpropermasculine singular

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. Sacrificing-a-sacrifice: the verb that will not let the king act alone — 8:62-63

After the longest prayer in the Former Prophets, the narrative restarts with a participle: זֹבְחִים (zō·ḇə·ḥîm, H2076), masculine plural, durative. Pulpit fastens on exactly this, arguing that the words prove the sacrifices were offered by the people as well as by the king. K&D turns the same grammar against Thenius's famous arithmetic: because 8:62 names Solomon and all Israel as offerers, and 8:63 closes with “the king and all the children of Israel dedicated,” the numbers were never a royal private expenditure, and under Leviticus 1 and 3 any Israelite could slaughter and flay, the priest's exclusive province being only the blood and the fire. Cambridge supplies the other half of the arithmetic from Leviticus 7:15: the greater part of a shelem is eaten, so 142,000 animals are a fortnight's provision for a nation encamped, not a bonfire. JFB measures it against the pagan world, where hecatombs of a hundred and chiliombs of a thousand were the known extremes, and judges that Solomon's offering surpassed all the other oblations on record. Only Ellicott dissents in tone, hearing under the profusion the heathen notion that God is pleased with thousands of rams, and warning that in these ideas lurked the evils which would make the Temple a heap of stones. ⚙ The Hebrew itself passes no verdict; it simply doubles the root, zābaḥ zebaḥ, slaughter and slaughtering, and leaves the reader to decide whether abundance here is worship or display.

ii. The altar declared small — 8:64

The theological hinge of the unit is one adjective: קָטֹן (qā·ṭōn, H6996), “small.” The bronze altar, twenty cubits square by 2 Chronicles 4:1, the one piece of sacred furniture whose dimensions God specified, is reported inadequate. Pulpit cannot resist the irony that a surface of roughly a hundred square yards would not serve. The remedy is a Piel: קִדַּשׁ (qid·daš, H6942), the king made holy the תּוֹךְ (tō·wḵ, H8432) of the court. Barnes reads that noun as the whole area within the walls, which thus became one huge altar, on any part of which victims might be offered at one and the same time; Pulpit allows either that or temporary altars raised across the space; Poole and Benson restrict it to the priests' court. The commentators feel the pressure of a layman sanctifying ground: Poole and Benson both reach for Solomon as prophet as well as king to license it, and Poole is careful that the consecration was temporary, the improvised altars demolished after the solemnity. JFB says the same, a temporary erection in aid of the established altar. ⚙ Note the verb in the clause that explains the failure: מֵהָכִיל (mê·hā·ḵîl, kûwl, H3557), “from containing.” It is the root Solomon himself used in 8:27, where the heaven of heavens cannot contain God. Twice in one chapter a vessel is measured against what it must hold, and twice the vessel is too small. The house that cannot hold God stands over an altar that cannot hold the thanks for it.

iii. From Lebo-hamath to the wadi of Egypt: seven days and seven days — 8:65

The assembly is a קָהָל (qā·hāl, H6951), a convoked body, and the narrator measures it not in numbers but in borders, from the entering in of Hamath to the נַחַל (na·ḥal, H5158) of Egypt. Pulpit insists on the philology: nachal is a torrent bed, not nāhār, a river, and Ellicott identifies it with the wadi at El-Arish rather than the Nile, the same border Numbers 34:5 and Joshua 15:4 fix. K&D reads the pair as a merism, the whole land in its fullest extent from north to south; Geneva's marginal gloss says it plainly, from North to South, meaning all the country. On the doubled week the voices converge and then split. Geneva: seven days for the dedication, and seven for the feast. Pulpit: the two periods are thus distinguished because they were properly distinct. K&D argues from the article on הֶחָג (he·ḥāḡ, H2282), pointing back to 8:2, that “the feast” is Tabernacles, and that the eighth day of v. 66 is the atzereth of Leviticus 23:36. Poole, Benson and JFB press a further point from the odd phrasing: the fourteen were probably not continuous, since the Day of Atonement fell on the tenth of that month. ⚙ Whatever the calendar, the sentence does something the arithmetic cannot: it sets the full extent of the promised land inside the full sacred number, doubled. For fourteen days the land is as large as the promise and the nation is all in one place.

iv. Blessed, dismissed, good of heart — 8:66

The dedication ends not with fire but with dismissal. שִׁלַּח (šil·laḥ, H7971), a Piel, is a formal release; and then the direction of blessing reverses. In 8:14 the king blessed the congregation; here וַיְבָרֲכוּ (way·ḇā·ră·ḵū, H1288, root sense “to kneel”) has the people as subject and the king as object. Poole offers both senses, that they prayed God to bless him and that they praised him; Pulpit adds a third, that the word here means to felicitate on taking leave, as at Proverbs 27:14 and 1 Samuel 25:6; Cambridge reports Josephus's version, that they went away thanking the king and praying God to give them Solomon for a long time to come. They go לְאָהֳלֵיהֶם, to their tents, and Barnes, Cambridge, K&D and Pulpit all note the fossil idiom from the nomadic years; Ellicott alone suggests the word may have been drawn up by the Feast of Tabernacles itself, which the writer has just recorded. The last clause reaches backward: the good was done לְדָוִד עַבְדּוֹ, for David his servant. K&D explains why the dead king is named at the close, because the completed house was the fulfilment of the promise given to him; Pulpit calls David the real founder, Solomon having entered into his labours. Henry draws the only application any of them draws: thus should we go home, rejoicing, from holy ordinances, thankful for God's Goodness.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested against the text. Read the unit by its two measurements and it holds together. In 8:27 Solomon says the heaven of heavens cannot contain (kûwl, H3557) God; in 8:64 the bronze altar is small from containing (qāṭōn mê·hā·ḵîl, the same root) what the people bring. The house is too small for the God; the altar is too small for the gratitude. The narrator does not treat either as a failure. He reports the second the way one reports a flood: the remedy is not a bigger altar but a hallowed floor, the whole court turned altar for a season and then unmade. That is a strange thing for a book so attentive to divine specification to record without comment, and it is the honest centre of the passage: at the highest moment of Israel's cult, the prescribed apparatus is visibly exceeded, and the excess is accommodated by improvisation that will be demolished. The unit then measures time the same way, seven and seven, a week doubled past the ordinary week, ending on an eighth day that belongs to neither. ⚙ I would not press these into a system. But I notice that every container in the chapter, house, altar, week, is both honoured and overrun, and that the people go home to tents. Whatever was dedicated that day, the text's own vocabulary keeps declining to let it be final. Where the commentators divide, I follow the grammar rather than the harmonization: the plural participle of v. 62 and the plural verb of v. 63 make this the nation's act, and Ellicott's suspicion of the numbers, while it is a legitimate reading of Israel's later history, is not something this text says.

The house could not contain the God, and the altar could not contain the thanks. (This line is synthesis, not Scripture.)

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The rare verb of dedication: a new house, a young child, and the temple verbal / quotation: confirmed

The verb that dedicates the temple in 8:63, וַיַּחְנְכוּ (chânak, H2596), occurs in only four verses of the Hebrew Bible. At Deuteronomy 20:5 a man who has built a new house and not yet dedicated it is released from the army to go and do it; at Proverbs 22:6 the same root is used of training a child in the way he should go. Strong's root sense, “properly, to narrow,” holds both: to initiate a thing into the channel it is meant to run in. ⚙ Read together, the three occurrences say that dedication in Hebrew is not a ceremony of ownership but the first use of a thing for its purpose, which is precisely Benson's and Poole's gloss on this verse, that they began to set it apart for the work and service of God. The noun built on this root is the name of the later feast of Dedication.

Deuteronomy 20:5 · Proverbs 22:6

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H2596 chânak, which occurs in only 4 verses of the Hebrew Bible. The rarity makes this a genuine verbal link; it is a shared lexeme, not a quotation of one text by another.

The parallel account: Chronicles on the same seven days and seven days structural / thematic: confirmed

2 Chronicles 7:4-10 narrates this same dedication, and the Verifier records overlapping lexemes at three points: 7:5 shares zâbach (H2076), zebach (H2077) and bâqâr (H1241) with 8:62-63; 7:7 shares shelem (H8002), Shᵉlômôh (H8010) and châtsêr (H2691) with the hallowing of the court in 8:64; 7:10 shares the numerals and the king's name with 8:66. These lexemes are all common, so the link is not established by rarity but by the two texts being accounts of one event. The Chronicler is the source of nearly every harmonization the commentators use here: JFB and Gill get the fire from heaven from 2 Chronicles 7:1, Cambridge gets the Levites' music from 7:6, and K&D, Ellicott, Barnes, Poole and Pulpit all reconcile the “eighth day” of 8:66 against the “twenty-third day of the seventh month” in 7:10. K&D concedes the two dates do not strictly agree and attributes the difference to imprecision about a well-known matter.

2 Chronicles 7:5 · 2 Chronicles 7:7 · 2 Chronicles 7:10

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H2076 zâbach (127 vv), H2077 zebach (153 vv), H1241 bâqâr (172 vv) at 7:5; H8002 shelem (84 vv), H8010 Shᵉlômôh (263 vv), H2691 châtsêr (163 vv) at 7:7; H8010 and H6242 at 7:10. All common lexemes: the relation is that of parallel narrative, not quotation, and the two accounts differ on the day of dismissal.

Seven days and an eighth: the law of Tabernacles behind the doubled week structural / thematic: confirmed

Leviticus 23:39 prescribes the חַג (chag, H2282) of the seventh month for seven days beginning on the fifteenth, with a closing assembly on the eighth (23:36). 1 Kings 8:65-66 counts seven and seven and then dismisses on “the eighth day.” K&D builds his whole reconstruction on that correspondence, taking the eighth day as the atzereth of Leviticus 23:36 rather than as the eighth day of the fourteen, and Pulpit, Barnes, Ellicott and Cambridge follow the same law text. ⚙ The link is at the level of shared legal institution and shared festal vocabulary, not citation: Kings never quotes Leviticus here, and Cambridge in fact argues from this passage that the Pentateuchal ordinances were not yet in full observance, which is a contested claim of nineteenth-century criticism rather than a datum of the text.

Leviticus 23:39 · Leviticus 23:36

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H2282 chag (55 vv), H6240 ʻâsâr (291 vv), H7651 shebaʻ (343 vv) at Leviticus 23:39. Shared festal vocabulary and a shared institution; no quotation is claimed in either direction.

Nehemiah's booths: the same feast, seven days and the eighth, after the exile structural / thematic: confirmed

Nehemiah 8:18 reports the returned exiles keeping the chag seven days with a solemn assembly on the eighth (shᵉmîynîy, H8066), the identical three-word skeleton the Verifier finds here. ⚙ The two scenes bracket the temple: Solomon's assembly goes out from a house just dedicated to their tents, and Nehemiah's assembly, after that house has been destroyed, is living in booths again. The archaism Barnes, Cambridge and K&D note in 8:66, “tents” for homes, becomes literal in Nehemiah. I offer that as a reading, not as something either text states.

Nehemiah 8:18

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H2282 chag (55 vv), H7651 shebaʻ (343 vv), H8066 shᵉmîynîy (27 vv). H8066 is comparatively uncommon and the three co-occur in the same festal formula, but since both texts are describing the same standing institution this is a shared-liturgy link, deliberately not tiered verbal.

Jeroboam's counterfeit: the same words, the wrong altar, the wrong month structural / thematic: confirmed

Four chapters later, 1 Kings 12:32-33 reports Jeroboam making a חַג (chag, H2282) in the eighth month on the fifteenth day, going up to a מִזְבֵּחַ (mizbêach, H4196) to sacrifice (zâbach, H2076), “like the feast that is in Judah.” The narrator of Kings uses the same vocabulary for both scenes, and the Verifier confirms the overlap. ⚙ The comparison is the book's own: everything Solomon does here, Jeroboam will imitate with the calendar shifted a month and the altar of his own devising. What makes Solomon's improvised altar in 8:64 legitimate and Jeroboam's illegitimate is not stated in either text by any explicit rule, which is exactly why Poole and Benson feel compelled to invoke Solomon's prophetic office. That unease is worth keeping rather than resolving.

1 Kings 12:32 · 1 Kings 12:33

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H2076 zâbach (127 vv) and H4196 mizbêach (338 vv) at 12:32; H4196, H2282 chag (55 vv), H6240 ʻâsâr (291 vv) at 12:33. Common lexemes, but the same narrator is deliberately reusing the festal formula, so the link is literary and structural, not a quotation.

Peace offerings at Sinai and peace offerings at the house structural / thematic: confirmed

Exodus 24:5 has young men of Israel offering burnt offerings and sacrificing שְׁלָמִים (shelem, H8002) oxen to YHWH at the ratification of the covenant, after which the elders eat and drink before God. Exodus 20:24 had already authorized an altar of earth on which ʻolah and shelamim, sheep and oxen (bâqâr, H1241), could be offered wherever the Name is recorded. ⚙ That second text is the nearest thing in the Torah to a warrant for what Solomon does in 8:64 when he sanctifies open ground and sacrifices on it; I note it as a possible legal background, not as a citation the narrator makes. The commentators here do not appeal to it, preferring Solomon's prophetic status.

Exodus 24:5 · Exodus 20:24

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H2076 zâbach (127 vv), H2077 zebach (153 vv), H8002 shelem (84 vv) at Exodus 24:5; H2076, H1241 bâqâr (172 vv), H8002 at Exodus 20:24. Common sacrificial vocabulary, so this is a shared-institution link. The suggestion that Exodus 20:24 licenses the hallowing of the court in 8:64 is my inference and is not made by any voice in this unit.

The Feast of Dedication and the last great day: two Gospel scenes on this ground structural / thematic: confirmed

John 10:22-23 places Jesus in the temple at the Feast of Dedication, walking in Solomon's Colonnade, and John 7:37 places him there on the last and greatest day of the Feast of Tabernacles. 1 Kings 8:62-66 is the founding instance of both observances in one week: the dedication (chânak, H2596, the root behind the later feast's name) and the chag of the seventh month, and it ends on the eighth day of the latter. ⚙ No verbal link can be claimed: John is Greek, Kings is Hebrew, and there is no shared Strong's lexeme to appeal to across the two languages. The connection is that of institution and setting, and it is historically solid on that ground alone: the calendar and the colonnade in John are named after what happens in this unit.

John 10:22 · John 7:37

basis: Cross-Testament Greek to Hebrew: shared Strong's numbers are impossible, so no verbal tier can apply. The recorded basis is institutional and topographical continuity, the Feast of Dedication and the Feast of Tabernacles and Solomon's portico, all of which trace to the events of 1 Kings 8:62-66.

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

An altar too small, and a sacrifice that needed offering only once novel

⚙ The narrator's own verdict in 8:64 is that the prescribed bronze altar was קָטֹן (qā·ṭōn), small, measured against what had to be brought, and the remedy was to hallow the floor for a season and then unmake it. The apostolic argument about the Levitical cult in Hebrews 10:11 runs along the same grain from the other end: the priest stands daily offering the same sacrifices repeatedly, which can never take sins away, whereas one offering has perfected for all time those who are sanctified (10:14). This unit does not say that. What it does say is that the apparatus was visibly exceeded on the day of its greatest triumph, and that the excess was met by an improvisation with a demolition date. ⚙ I read 8:64 as the cult's own recorded confession of insufficiency, and I mark this as my synthesis: the general Christian reading of the temple sacrifices as provisional is ancient and widely held, but grounding it specifically in the “altar too small” of this verse is my own move and should be tested. Ellicott, from a different angle, already reads the profusion of these very offerings as containing the seed of what would ruin the Temple.

Hebrews 10:11-14 · 1 Kings 8:64

The dedicated house and the temple of his body ancient/widely-held

⚙ 8:63 dedicates the house with the rare verb chânak, whose sense Poole and Benson gloss as beginning to set a thing apart for the work and service of God. John 2:19-21 has Jesus answer a demand for a sign in the temple courts by speaking of destroying and raising “this temple,” and the evangelist glosses it: he was speaking of the temple of his body. ⚙ The link is not verbal and cannot be, since John is Greek and Kings Hebrew; it is the transfer of a category. The reading that the temple is fulfilled in the person of Christ is ancient and widely held, taught by the evangelist himself. What this unit contributes to it is precise and often missed: the house was dedicated by blood, by a nation, and for fourteen days, and at the end of it everybody went back to tents. The permanence was always in the promise rather than the masonry, which is why 8:66 closes by naming David and the goodness done to him rather than the building.

John 2:19-21 · 1 Kings 8:63

The king who blesses, is blessed, and sends the people away glad ancient/widely-held

⚙ The unit's final movement is a king dismissing a whole nation with a blessing, and Luke 24:50-52 ends the Gospel with Christ lifting his hands, blessing his disciples, parting from them, and their returning with great joy. Benson makes the typological connection explicitly on this passage, reading David his servant as a type of Christ, and applying the people's joy to believers, his spiritual Israel, under the covenant of grace; Henry turns the same verse into an instruction that we should go home rejoicing from holy ordinances. The Davidic typology is ancient and widely held, and 8:66 is unusually suited to it because the goodness the people rejoice in is said to have been done for David his servant, a man not present, whose promise the day has discharged. ⚙ The verbal echo with Luke is mine and is not a lexical link; what is sourced here is Benson's and Henry's reading of the joy, and K&D's observation that David is named because the finished house fulfilled the promise given to him.

Luke 24:50-52 · 2 Samuel 7:12-13 · 1 Kings 8:66

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

⚙ Honesty notes for this unit. (1) Numbers. The 22,000 oxen and 120,000 sheep of 8:63 are defended as transmitted by Ellicott (identical in Chronicles and Josephus), by Pulpit (all Versions agree; no ground for suspecting exaggeration, though numerals elsewhere are corrupted in transcription), by Barnes and by K&D. Cambridge reports that Josephus lowers the oxen to twelve thousand while keeping the sheep. The defenses turn on two claims from Leviticus, that non-priests could slaughter and flay (K&D) and that most of a peace offering was eaten (Cambridge, Pulpit); Ellicott alone floats the alternative that only representative victims of each hecatomb were actually offered, the rest dedicated and killed elsewhere. No voice here claims the text is corrupt.

(2) The eighth day. 8:66 says “the eighth day”; 2 Chronicles 7:10 says the twenty-third day of the seventh month. K&D states plainly that taken strictly the two are at variance and explains the Kings figure as want of precision in a well-known matter. Barnes, Ellicott, Poole, Gill, Cambridge and Pulpit all harmonize by taking the eighth day as the closing assembly of Tabernacles. The BSB's bracketed “[fifteenth]” in 8:66 is a translator's harmonization, not a reading of the Hebrew, which has only haš·šə·mînî, “the eighth.” I have kept the discrepancy visible rather than resolving it.

(3) Fire from heaven. JFB and Gill both describe fire descending to consume the sacrifice of 8:62. That is 2 Chronicles 7:1. The Kings text does not report it, and readers should know the image is imported.

(4) Solomon as prophet. Poole and Benson justify a king sanctifying the court by asserting he was endowed with God's Spirit as a prophet as well as a king. Nothing in 8:64 says this. It is their solution to a real difficulty, and I have flagged it rather than repeated it as fact.

(5) Cambridge's critical aside. On 8:65 Cambridge argues that Solomon's part in the ceremony shows the Pentateuchal ordinances were not yet in observance, while adding that this cannot of itself establish the non-existence of the Levitical law. That is a nineteenth-century critical position, carried here because it is in the public-domain source, not because this synthesis endorses it.

(6) Text of 8:65. Cambridge judges “our God” in “before the LORD our God” to have the appearance of an editorial addition unlikely to stand in the original narrative. Gill records that the Vatican copy of the Septuagint reads “seven days” only once. Both are noted as reported variants, not adopted.

(7) Word order. The interlinear in the brief is aligned to English phrase order at several points (notably 8:63, where bāqār is listed after the numerals, and 8:65-66, where the opening words are re-sequenced). The literal renderings above follow Hebrew order, so their sequence will not always match the index numbering of the notes.

(8) All cross-reference bases are the Verifier's computed shared-lexeme data; every cross-Testament link in this unit is tiered structural because shared Strong's numbers cannot exist across Hebrew and Greek.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)