The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

1 Samuel15:24–35

Saul’s Confession

Generated by AI. It can be wrong, and it has no authority. Every note here is fallible commentary — never the Word itself. Public-domain sources are quoted and named; machine synthesis is marked and meant to be checked. Weigh all of it against Scripture. “They received the word with all readiness… and searched the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” — Acts 17:11
Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

1 Samuel 15:24–35 — Saul’s Confession. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

24“Then Saul said to Samuel, “I have sinned; I have transgressed th…”+

24Then Saul said to Samuel, “I have sinned; I have transgressed the LORD’s commandment and your instructions, because I feared the people and obeyed their voice.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

šā·’ūl way·yō·mer ’el- šə·mū·’êl ḥā·ṭā·ṯî kî- ‘ā·ḇar·tî ’eṯ- Yah·weh wə·’eṯ- pî- də·ḇā·re·ḵā kî yā·rê·ṯî ’eṯ- hā·‘ām wā·’eš·ma‘ bə·qō·w·lām

Literal — word-for-word from the original

And-said Saul unto-Samuel: “I-have-sinned, for I-crossed-over the-mouth of-YHWH and-thy-words; because I-feared the-people and-I-hearkened to-their-voice.”

Where the English smooths the original

  • פִּֽי־ פִּי־יְהוָה (pî-YHWH, H6310 peh) is not “commandment” but the mouth of the LORD — the organ of speech itself, the means of blowing. BSB smooths a bodily metaphor into a legal noun. Saul did not merely break a statute; he walked past a spoken word out of a mouth. Poole reads the construct with the next noun as “the commandment of the Lord delivered to me by thy words; another hendiadis.”
  • עָבַ֥רְתִּי עָבַרְתִּי (‘āḇartî, H5674 ʻâbar, Qal perfect 1cs) — “I crossed over.” English “transgressed” is Latin for the same picture, but it has gone dead; the Hebrew is still spatial. Saul stepped over a line that a mouth had drawn.
  • וָאֶשְׁמַ֖ע וָאֶשְׁמַע בְּקוֹלָם (wā’ešma‘ bəqōlām, H8085 + H6963) — “and I hearkened to their voice.” BSB’s “obeyed their voice” is right in sense but hides the verbal echo: the whole chapter’s indictment is that Saul did not shemaʻ bəqol YHWH. He heard a voice; he simply heard the wrong one.
  • יָרֵ֙אתִי֙ יָרֵאתִי אֶת־הָעָם (yārê’ṯî ’eṯ-hā‘ām, H3372) — the verb of the fear of God is here aimed at the people, and takes them as a direct object with ’eṯ. The English “I feared the people” is accurate but flat; the Hebrew places the people in the grammatical slot reserved elsewhere for YHWH.
Word by word18 · parsed+
שָׁא֤וּלšā·’ūlThen SaulH7586
√ Shâʼûwl — Shaul, the name of an Edomite and two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֹּ֨אמֶרway·yō·mersaidH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
אֶל־’el-toH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPreposition
שְׁמוּאֵל֙šə·mū·’êlSamuelH8050
√ Shᵉmûwʼêl — Shemuel, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
חָטָ֔אתִיḥā·ṭā·ṯîI have sinnedH2398
√ châṭâʼ — properly, to missVerbQalPerfectfirst person common singular
châṭâʼ — properly, to miss (Qal perfect) The root means to miss the mark, and the perfect states it as a settled fact, not a feeling. The confession itself is exact; the commentators divide over what stands behind it. Benson holds that Saul “nakedly declares the thing as it was”; Poole, Gill, JFB, Cambridge and K&D all judge it the repentance of a man who shrank from the sentence and not from the sin. Barnes puts the question most sharply by setting it beside David’s confession in Psalm 51.
כִּֽי־kî-H3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
עָבַ֥רְתִּי‘ā·ḇar·tîI have transgressedH5674
√ ʻâbar — to cross overVerbQalPerfectfirst person common singular
ʻâbar — to cross over A verb of movement, not of legal category. It is the word for fording a river or passing a boundary; sin is here spatial trespass across a spoken line.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
יְהוָ֖הYah·wehthe LORD’sH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
וְאֶת־wə·’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
פִּֽי־pî-commandmentH6310
√ peh — the mouth (as the means of blowing), whether literal or figurative (particularly speech)Nounmasculine singular construct
peh — the mouth (as the means of blowing) The construct pî-YHWH makes the standard Saul violated an act of divine speech, not a code. This is the same figure as “by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of the LORD.” Coupled by waw to דְּבָרֶיךָ (“thy words”), it puts God's mouth and the prophet's words in one breath — which Poole calls a hendiadys, and which Gill and Pulpit both read as flattery of the prophet. Pulpit: “It seems, too, as if it were Samuel whom he feared more than Jehovah.”
דְּבָרֶ֑יךָdə·ḇā·re·ḵāand your instructionsH1697
√ dâbâr — a wordNounmasculine plural constructsecond person masculine singular
כִּ֤יbecauseH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
יָרֵ֙אתִי֙yā·rê·ṯîI fearedH3372
√ yârêʼ — to fearVerbQalPerfectfirst person common singular
yârêʼ — to fear The pivot of the verse and of Saul's reign. The fear owed upward is spent sideways. Ellicott: he “preferred… the sweets of transient popular applause to the solitary consciousness that he was a faithful servant of the Highest.” Poole flatly disbelieves the excuse and points to 1 Samuel 11:7 and 14:24, where Saul cowed the people at will.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
הָעָ֔םhā·‘āmthe peopleH5971
√ ʻam — a people (as a congregated unit)ArticleNounmasculine singular
ʻam — a people (as a congregated unit) The collective noun; the king's constituency, and here his idol.
וָאֶשְׁמַ֖עwā·’eš·ma‘and obeyedH8085
√ shâmaʻ — to hear intelligently (often with implication of attention, obedience, etcConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectfirst person common singular
shâmaʻ — to hear intelligently (Qal consecutive imperfect) Hearing and obeying are one act in Hebrew; the consecutive imperfect makes the obedience follow the fear as its direct consequence. Saul's grammar convicts him: fear produced hearing, and the voice he heard was the people's.
בְּקוֹלָֽם׃bə·qō·w·lāmtheir voiceH6963
√ qôwl — a voice or soundPreposition-bNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine plural
The Voices✦ public domain+
He, with stammering lips, while deprecating the Divine sentence, still seeks to justify himself; but all that he could allege in excuse only more plainly marked out his unfitness for his high post.
It does by no means appear that Saul acts the hypocrite herein, in assigning a false cause of his disobedience. Rather, he nakedly declares the thing as it was.
Benson stands nearly alone here. Poole, Gill, JFB, Cambridge, Pulpit and K&D all read the confession as self-serving; Benson takes Saul at his word and reads the excuse as candour rather than hypocrisy. We record the minority reading because the Hebrew alone does not settle it.
But how little he feared the people, may be seen by 1 Samuel 11:7 14:24 . But this was a false cause; nor doth he acknowledge the true cause, which was his covetousness, and because he did not fear God.
25“Now therefore, please forgive my sin and return with me so I can…”+

25Now therefore, please forgive my sin and return with me so I can worship the LORD.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·‘at·tāh nā ’eṯ- śā ḥaṭ·ṭā·ṯî wə·šūḇ ‘im·mî wə·’eš·ta·ḥă·weh Yah·weh

Literal — word-for-word from the original

“And-now lift, I-pray, my-sin, and-return with-me, and-I-will-bow-myself-down to-YHWH.”

Where the English smooths the original

  • שָׂ֥א שָׂא (śā, H5375 nâsâʼ, Qal imperative) — “lift, carry, bear away,” not “forgive” as a courtroom verb. Hebrew pardon is a load being picked up and carried off. BSB’s “forgive my sin” loses the weight being shifted, and with it the question Gill presses: onto whom?
  • חַטָּאתִ֑י חַטָּאתִי (ḥaṭṭā’ṯî, H2403 chaṭṭâʼâh) — one noun covering the offence, its penalty, and the sacrifice that expiates it. Gill notes that “pardon” here may mean no more than “averting a threatened judgment,” which is exactly the ambiguity the Hebrew noun carries.
  • וְאֶֽשְׁתַּחֲוֶ֖ה וְאֶשְׁתַּחֲוֶה (wə’eštaḥăweh, H7812 shâchâh, Hitpael cohortative) — the root is “to depress, prostrate.” It is a body thrown flat, not the English abstraction “worship.” The cohortative makes it Saul’s own resolve, and it is grammatically dependent on Samuel first returning.
  • וְשׁ֣וּב וְשׁוּב (wəšūḇ, H7725 shûwb, imperative) — “turn back.” The king commands the prophet with the very verb that elsewhere names repentance. Saul asks Samuel to shuwb; he does not himself shuwb.
Word by word9 · parsed+
וְעַתָּ֕הwə·‘at·tāhNow thereforeH6258
√ ʻattâh — at this time, whether adverb, conjunction or expletiveConjunctive wawAdverb
נָ֖אpleaseH4994
√ nâʼ — 'I pray', 'now', or 'then'Interjection
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
שָׂ֥אśāforgiveH5375
√ nâsâʼ — to lift, in a great variety of applications, literal and figurative, absolute and relativeVerbQalImperativemasculine singular
nâsâʼ — to lift, in a great variety of applications An imperative addressed to a man. Gill weighs whether Saul thinks Samuel can absolve, or only intercede, and decides for intercession plus a reversal of sentence; Poole allows both — “he had sinned not only against God, but against Samuel also, as God's prophet.” The verb's physicality is why Scripture can later speak of sin being lifted and carried away by another.
חַטָּאתִ֑יḥaṭ·ṭā·ṯîmy sinH2403
√ chaṭṭâʼâh — an offence (sometimes habitual sinfulness), and its penalty, occasion, sacrifice, or expiationNounfeminine singular constructfirst person common singular
וְשׁ֣וּבwə·šūḇand returnH7725
√ shûwb — to turn back (hence, away) transitively or intransitively, literally or figuratively (not necessarily with the idea of return to the starting point)Conjunctive wawVerbQalImperativemasculine singular
shûwb — to turn back (Qal imperative) K&D observes that the imperative “presupposes that Samuel was about to go away after the executing his commission.” It is the hinge-verb of the whole scene: Samuel will refuse it in v. 26 and perform it in v. 31.
עִמִּ֔י‘im·mîwith meH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iPrepositionfirst person common singular
וְאֶֽשְׁתַּחֲוֶ֖הwə·’eš·ta·ḥă·wehso I can worshipH7812
√ shâchâh — to depress, iConjunctive wawVerbHitpaelConjunctive imperfect Cohortative if contextualfirst person common singular
shâchâh — to depress, prostrate oneself (Hitpael) The Hitpael is reflexive: he flattens himself. Note the sequence Saul proposes — pardon, then the prophet's company, then prostration. Poole and JFB both read the request as partly political: if Samuel stands beside him at the altar, the reserved cattle look sanctioned.
לַֽיהוָֽה׃Yah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of God Saul says simply “to YHWH” here; in v. 30 he will say “YHWH thy God."
The Voices✦ public domain+
It was not true and serious repentance, or the result of genuine sorrow of heart because he had offended God, but was merely repentance of the lips arising from fear of losing the kingdom, and of incurring public disgrace
K&D is quoting the Jesuit commentator Cornelius a Lapide, and says so; the judgment is a seventeenth-century one carried into a nineteenth-century commentary.
It can hardly be thought that Saul was so ignorant as to imagine that Samuel could pardon his sin, as committed against God, which none but God can do, but that he would forgive it, so far as he had offended him;
This was not true repentance, but deceit out of fear for the loss of his kingdom.
26““I will not return with you,” Samuel replied. “For you have reje…”+

26“I will not return with you,” Samuel replied. “For you have rejected the word of the LORD, and He has rejected you as king over Israel.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

lō ’ā·šūḇ ‘im·māḵ šə·mū·’êl way·yō·mer ’el- šā·’ūl kî mā·’as·tāh ’eṯ- də·ḇar Yah·weh Yah·weh way·yim·’ā·sə·ḵā mih·yō·wṯ me·leḵ ‘al- yiś·rā·’êl

Literal — word-for-word from the original

And-said Samuel unto-Saul: “I-will-not return with-thee; for thou-hast-rejected the-word of-YHWH, and-YHWH-hath-rejected-thee from-being king over-Israel.”

Where the English smooths the original

  • מָאַ֙סְתָּה֙ מָאַסְתָּה … וַיִּמְאָסְךָ (mā’astāh … wayyim’āseḵā, H3988 mâʼaç, “to spurn”) — the same root twice, active then reflected back. English “rejected… rejected” keeps the word but not the sting: mâʼaç is contemptuous refusal, to spurn as worthless. The sentence is measure for measure, and the grammar says so before the theology does.
  • מִהְי֥וֹת מִהְיוֹת מֶלֶךְ (mihyōwṯ meleḵ, H1961 hâyâh infinitive with min) — literally “from being king,” not BSB’s “as king.” The preposition min severs; it removes Saul from the very state of kingship, not merely from a title.
  • עִמָּ֑ךְ עִמָּךְ (‘immāḵ) — the parse here is second person feminine singular, an anomaly in a speech addressed to Saul. The consonantal text permits the reading; BSB renders the expected masculine “with you.” We flag the oddity rather than explain it away.
Word by word18 · parsed+
לֹ֥אI will notH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absAdverbNegative particle
אָשׁ֖וּב’ā·šūḇreturnH7725
√ shûwb — to turn back (hence, away) transitively or intransitively, literally or figuratively (not necessarily with the idea of return to the starting point)VerbQalImperfectfirst person common singular
shûwb — to turn back (Qal imperfect 1cs) Samuel answers Saul's imperative with the same root in the negative. Benson and Poole both defend the honesty of this refusal against the fact that Samuel does return in v. 31: “his words and his intentions agreed together, though afterward he saw reason to change his intentions.” Poole draws a pastoral conclusion from it about promises lawfully reconsidered.
עִמָּ֑ךְ‘im·māḵwith youH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iPrepositionsecond person feminine singular
שְׁמוּאֵל֙šə·mū·’êlSamuelH8050
√ Shᵉmûwʼêl — Shemuel, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֹּ֤אמֶרway·yō·merrepliedH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
אֶל־’el-H413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPreposition
שָׁא֔וּלšā·’ūlH7586
√ Shâʼûwl — Shaul, the name of an Edomite and two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
כִּ֤יForH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
מָאַ֙סְתָּה֙mā·’as·tāhyou have rejectedH3988
√ mâʼaç — to spurnVerbQalPerfectsecond person masculine singular
mâʼaç — to spurn The governing verb of the whole chapter (see v. 23). Saul spurned a word; he is spurned from a throne. Gill notes that the sentence “is repeated from 1 Samuel 15:23 for the confirmation of it” — repetition in Hebrew narrative is ratification, not redundancy.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
דְּבַ֣רdə·ḇarthe wordH1697
√ dâbâr — a wordNounmasculine singular construct
dâbâr — a word The object Saul spurned is dᵉbar YHWH, and in v. 24 he named his own offence against pî YHWH, the mouth. Mouth and word bracket the confession and the verdict: the whole transaction is about speech honoured or despised.
יְהוָ֔הYah·wehof the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
יְהוָ֔הYah·wehand [He]H3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
וַיִּמְאָסְךָ֣way·yim·’ā·sə·ḵāhas rejected youH3988
√ mâʼaç — to spurnConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singularsecond person masculine singular
mâʼaç — to spurn (consecutive imperfect with 2ms suffix) The suffix makes Saul himself the object. Benson enters an honest caveat that the text does not say God “hath rejected thee from salvation. And who besides hath authority to say so?”
מִהְי֥וֹתmih·yō·wṯasH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iPreposition-mVerbQalInfinitive construct
מֶ֖לֶךְme·leḵkingH4428
√ melek — a kingNounmasculine singular
melek — a king Anarthrous and absolute: not “the king,” but the office itself, which is what is being withdrawn.
עַל־‘al-overH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃סyiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
The Voices✦ public domain+
This was no lie, though he afterward returned, because he spoke what he meant; his words and his intentions agreed together, though afterward he saw reason to change his intentions.
which is repeated from 1 Samuel 15:23 for the confirmation of it, and to let Saul know that his pretended confession and repentance had made no alteration in the decree and sentence of God respecting the kingdom.
Samuel too clearly sees what are the true springs of Saul’s repentance, and refuses at first.
27“As Samuel turned to go, Saul grabbed the hem of his robe, and it…”+

27As Samuel turned to go, Saul grabbed the hem of his robe, and it tore.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

šə·mū·’êl way·yis·sōḇ lā·le·ḵeṯ way·ya·ḥă·zêq biḵ·nap̄- mə·‘î·lōw way·yiq·qā·ra‘

Literal — word-for-word from the original

And-turned-about Samuel to-go, and-he-seized on-the-wing of-his-robe, and-it-was-torn.

Where the English smooths the original

  • בִּכְנַף־ כְּנַף (kənap̄, H3671 kânâph) is a wing — the edge or extremity of a garment named after a bird’s pinion. “Hem” (BSB) and “skirt” (AV) are both attempts at a word that means the outermost reach of a covering. Pulpit insists it was the outer border “probably at Samuel’s neck or shoulder”; Cambridge calls it “some kind of a lappet or flap hanging down behind.”
  • וַיִּקָּרַֽע׃ וַיִּקָּרַע (wayyiqqāra‘, H7167 qâraʻ, Nifal) — passive: “and it was torn,” not “he tore it.” K&D defends the Nifal against the LXX’s active reading, and the grammar carries the whole sign: no one intended the tearing. BSB’s “and it tore” is a fair English middle voice, but the Hebrew passive is what makes the accident an omen.
  • וַיַּחֲזֵ֥ק וַיַּחֲזֵק (wayyaḥăzêq, H2388 châzaq, Hifil) — “to fasten upon,” causative: he made himself strong upon it. BSB’s “grabbed” is close; what it loses is that this is the standard verb for strengthening, here bent into a grip of desperation.
  • מְעִיל֖וֹ מְעִילוֹ (mə‘îlōw, H4598 mᵉʻîyl) — the meil, a close-fitting over-tunic, not the prophet’s addereth. Ellicott and Pulpit are emphatic that the AV’s “mantle” imports a later prophetic costume back into Samuel’s day; and Pulpit adds that because the meil fitted closely, the tearing “implies a considerable amount of violence on Saul’s part.”
Word by word7 · parsed+
שְׁמוּאֵ֖לšə·mū·’êlAs SamuelH8050
√ Shᵉmûwʼêl — Shemuel, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיִּסֹּ֥בway·yis·sōḇturnedH5437
√ çâbab — to revolve, surround, or borderConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
çâbab — to revolve, surround, or border Samuel pivots. The verb of turning sets up the pun the scene runs on: Samuel turns away (çâbab), Saul begs him to turn back (shûwb), and in the end YHWH turns the kingdom to another.
לָלֶ֑כֶתlā·le·ḵeṯto goH1980
√ hâlak — to walk (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively)Preposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
וַיַּחֲזֵ֥קway·ya·ḥă·zêqSaul grabbedH2388
√ châzaq — to fasten uponConjunctive wawVerbHifilConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
châzaq — to fasten upon (Hifil) A grip meant to hold a verdict in place. K&D: “Saul was about to hold back the prophet by force, that he might obtain from him a revocation of the divine sentence.”
בִּכְנַף־biḵ·nap̄-the hemH3671
√ kânâph — an edge or extremityPreposition-bNounfeminine singular construct
kânâph — an edge or extremity (a wing) The same noun is used of the corner of a garment that a man spreads over a woman to claim her, and of the wings under which Israel takes refuge. Here the wing tears in the king's hand. Gill records a rabbinic dispute over whose garment was torn, and reports that some read this as pointing forward to David cutting the kânâph of Saul's robe.
מְעִיל֖וֹmə·‘î·lōwof his robeH4598
√ mᵉʻîyl — a robe (iNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
וַיִּקָּרַֽע׃way·yiq·qā·ra‘and it toreH7167
√ qâraʻ — to rend, literally or figuratively (revile, paint the eyes, as if enlarging them)Conjunctive wawVerbNifalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
qâraʻ — to rend, literally or figuratively (Nifal) The verse's theological weight sits on this passive stem. Samuel will pick the same root up in v. 28 as an active perfect with YHWH as subject: what happened accidentally in a man's fist is declared to have already happened in heaven. Cambridge: “The accident served Samuel as an emblem of the complete severance of the sovereignty from Saul.”
The Voices✦ public domain+
What Saul took hold of was the hem , the outer border of the garment, probably at Samuel's neck or shoulder, as he turned to go away. He seized him, as we should say, by the collar, and endeavoured by main force to retain him, and in the struggle the hem rent.
The accident served Samuel as an emblem of the complete severance of the sovereignty from Saul.
some say it was Samuel that rent the skirt of Saul, and by this signified to him, that he that cut off the skirt of his garment should reign in his stead; whereby Saul knew that David would be king when he cut off the skirt of his robe, 1 Samuel 24:4 ,
Gill is reporting a rabbinic reading (Midrash Schemuel, via Jarchi, Kimchi and Abarbinel), not endorsing it; he goes on to say “the plain sense is, that Saul rent the skirt of Samuel's mantle.”
28“So Samuel said to him, “The LORD has torn the kingdom of Israel …”+

28So Samuel said to him, “The LORD has torn the kingdom of Israel from you today and has given it to your neighbor who is better than you.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

šə·mū·’êl way·yō·mer ’ê·lāw Yah·weh ’eṯ- qā·ra‘ mam·lə·ḵūṯ yiś·rā·’êl mê·‘ā·le·ḵā hay·yō·wm ū·nə·ṯā·nāh lə·rê·‘ă·ḵā haṭ·ṭō·wḇ mim·me·kā

Literal — word-for-word from the original

And-said unto-him Samuel: “Hath-torn YHWH the-kingship of-Israel from-upon-thee this-day, and-hath-given-it to-thy-neighbour who-is-better than-thou.”

Where the English smooths the original

  • קָרַ֨ע קָרַע (qāra‘, H7167, Qal perfect) — “has torn,” completed action, with YHWH as subject and in the emphatic first position of the clause. The Hebrew word order is “Torn has YHWH…”; BSB’s “The LORD has torn” is idiomatic English but retires the fronting that makes the verb the hammer-blow.
  • מַמְלְכ֧וּת מַמְלְכוּת (mamləḵūṯ, H4468 mamlâkûwth) — dominion, the abstract exercise of rule, a rarer noun than mamlâkâh. Not the territory but the ruling itself is torn away. The gloss “kingdom” lets an English reader hear real estate.
  • מֵעָלֶ֖יךָ מֵעָלֶיךָ (mê‘āleḵā, min + ʻal) — “from off you,” a double preposition. BSB’s “from you” drops the second: the kingship is pictured as a garment lying upon Saul and stripped off him — which is precisely the torn meil still in his hand.
  • לְרֵעֲךָ֖ לְרֵעֲךָ (lərê‘ăḵā, H7453 rêaʻ) — “an associate, more or less close.” BSB “your neighbor” is right; the point is its vagueness. K&D: “Samuel did not yet know to whom Jehovah would give it.” Geneva's gloss simply supplies “That is, to David”; the Hebrew does not.
Word by word14 · parsed+
שְׁמוּאֵ֔לšə·mū·’êlSo SamuelH8050
√ Shᵉmûwʼêl — Shemuel, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֹּ֤אמֶרway·yō·mersaidH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
אֵלָיו֙’ê·lāwto himH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPrepositionthird person masculine singular
יְהוָ֜הYah·wehThe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
אֶֽת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
קָרַ֨עqā·ra‘has tornH7167
√ qâraʻ — to rend, literally or figuratively (revile, paint the eyes, as if enlarging them)VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
qâraʻ — to rend (Qal perfect) The perfect turns an accident into a fait accompli in heaven. Read against v. 27's Nifal, the pair is one of the cleanest examples in Scripture of a sign-act that no human agent intended: the man who tore the robe is the man from whom the kingdom is torn.
מַמְלְכ֧וּתmam·lə·ḵūṯthe kingdomH4468
√ mamlâkûwth — {dominion, iNounfeminine singular construct
mamlâkûwth — dominion, kingship The rarer of the two Hebrew nouns for kingdom, and the abstract one: not the land but the exercise of rule. What is torn away is therefore not territory — Saul keeps Gibeah, keeps his army, keeps the throne for years — but the right to rule as YHWH's man. Pulpit puts the practical consequence plainly: Saul “was de facto king, and would continue to be so during his lifetime,” and the anointing, “once bestowed, was a consecration for life.”
יִשְׂרָאֵ֛לyiś·rā·’êlof IsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
מֵעָלֶ֖יךָmê·‘ā·le·ḵāfrom youH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition-msecond person masculine singular
הַיּ֑וֹםhay·yō·wmtodayH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)ArticleNounmasculine singular
yôwm — a day hay-yōwm, “this day.” The rejection is dated even though the deposition will take years; Pulpit notes that Saul “was de facto king, and would continue to be so during his lifetime.”
וּנְתָנָ֕הּū·nə·ṯā·nāhand has givenH5414
√ nâthan — to give, used with greatest latitude of application (put, make, etcConjunctive wawVerbQalConjunctive perfectthird person masculine singularthird person feminine singular
לְרֵעֲךָ֖lə·rê·‘ă·ḵāit to your neighborH7453
√ rêaʻ — an associate (more or less close)Preposition-lNounmasculine singular constructsecond person masculine singular
rêaʻ — an associate (more or less close) A deliberately empty slot. Poole suggests “one of the neighbouring tribe, even Judah”; Gill agrees David is meant but insists Samuel did not yet know it, “for after this he is bid to go to Jesse's family.” The indefiniteness is itself the mercy and the menace of the oracle.
הַטּ֥וֹבhaṭ·ṭō·wḇ[who is] betterH2896
√ ṭôwb — good (as an adjective) in the widest senseArticleAdjectivemasculine singular
ṭôwb — good (as an adjective) in the widest sense haṭ-ṭōwḇ mimmeḵā — “the good one, more than thou.” In 1 Samuel 9:2 Saul was introduced as the choicest young man in Israel; the same adjectival world now names someone better. Gill: “more holy, just, and wise than Saul.”
מִמֶּֽךָּ׃mim·me·kāthan youH4480
√ min — properly, a part ofPrepositionsecond person masculine singular
The Voices✦ public domain+
A neighbour of thine; either another man, or another Israelite; for the word neighbour is used both ways; or rather, one of the neighbouring tribe, even Judah
and by a like sign was signified the rending of the ten tribes from the kingdom of Solomon in his son Rehoboam, 1 Kings 11:30 ,
It had not yet been revealed to the seer who was to replace the rebellious king, so he simply refers to the future anointed one quite indefinitely
29“Moreover, the Glory of Israel does not lie or change His mind, f…”+

29Moreover, the Glory of Israel does not lie or change His mind, for He is not a man, that He should change His mind.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·ḡam nê·ṣaḥ yiś·rā·’êl lō yə·šaq·qêr yin·nā·ḥêm kî lō hū wə·lō ’ā·ḏām lə·hin·nā·ḥêm

Literal — word-for-word from the original

And-also the-Enduring-One of-Israel doth-not-deal-falsely and-doth-not-relent; for not a-man is-He, that-He-should-relent.

Where the English smooths the original

  • נֵ֣צַח נֵצַח (nêṣaḥ, H5331) — “properly, a goal,” hence perpetuity, endurance, and only by a later Aramaising usage “glory.” BSB’s “the Glory of Israel” takes the least likely sense for this context. K&D argues for constancy and trust: “He is ישׂראל נצח, the unchangeable One, in whom Israel can trust.” Ellicott would render “the Changeless One of Israel”; JFB and Pulpit take it as “Victory” or “Triumph.” Barnes concedes only that the phrase “occurs only here.”
  • יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר יְשַׁקֵּר (yəšaqqêr, H8266 shâqar, Piel) — not simply “lie” but “to cheat, to deal falsely, to break faith.” A rare verb: it stands in only six verses in the canon. The Piel is intensive and relational — this is covenant-breaking, not misinformation.
  • יִנָּחֵ֑ם יִנָּחֵם (yinnāḥêm, H5162 nâcham, Nifal) — the root is “to sigh, to breathe deeply,” hence to be moved to pity or to change course. “Change His mind” (BSB) is an interpretation; the Hebrew is bodily — to draw a hard breath over something done. This is the same verb, and the same stem, that v. 35 applies to YHWH over Saul.
  • אָדָ֛ם אָדָם (’āḏām, H120) — “ruddy,” the earth-man. The denial is not of emotion but of creatureliness: the reason God does not nâcham like a man is that He is not made of the dust that changes.
Word by word12 · parsed+
וְגַם֙wə·ḡamMoreoverH1571
√ gam — properly, assemblageConjunction
נֵ֣צַחnê·ṣaḥthe GloryH5331
√ netsach — properly, a goal, iNounmasculine singular construct
netsach — properly, a goal; enduringness A divine title found nowhere else, and the commentators split on it cleanly. K&D and Cambridge read constancy or trust; Ellicott reads “the Changeless One”; JFB and Pulpit read “the Victory of Israel,” taking it as a rebuke to the Carmel monument Saul had just raised for himself; Gill lists all three senses without deciding. Barnes is the most honest: the word “means, perpetuity, truth, glory, victory, and trust, or confidence.” We do not resolve it; the context of unchangeableness favours K&D.
יִשְׂרָאֵ֔לyiś·rā·’êlof IsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
לֹ֥אdoes notH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absAdverbNegative particle
יְשַׁקֵּ֖רyə·šaq·qêrlieH8266
√ shâqar — to cheat, iVerbPielImperfectthird person masculine singular
shâqar — to cheat, to deal falsely Rare — six verses in the whole Hebrew Bible. In Genesis 21:23 Abimelech makes Abraham swear not to shâqar with him; in Leviticus 19:11 Israel is forbidden it; in Psalm 44:17 the sufferers protest they have not dealt falsely (shâqar) in the covenant; and in Psalm 89:33 God swears He will not shâqar in His faithfulness to David. The verb belongs to sworn relationships. Its denial of God in this verse is therefore not an abstract claim about truthfulness but a covenant guarantee.
יִנָּחֵ֑םyin·nā·ḥêmor change His mindH5162
√ nâcham — properly, to sigh, iVerbNifalImperfectthird person masculine singular
nâcham — properly, to sigh (Nifal) The crux of the chapter: v. 11 and v. 35 say YHWH did nâcham over making Saul king, and v. 29 says He does not nâcham. The standard resolution, given by Cambridge and K&D alike, is that v. 11 speaks ἀνθρωποπαθῶς and v. 29 θεοπρεπῶς. Cambridge refuses to call that a full answer: “This is only a partial solution… Scripture is content to state both sides of the question, and leave conscience rather than reason to reconcile them.”
כִּ֣יforH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
לֹ֥א. . .H3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absAdverbNegative particle
ה֖וּאHeH1931
√ hûwʼ — he (she or it)Pronounthird person masculine singular
וְלֹ֣אwə·lōis notH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absConjunctive wawAdverbNegative particle
אָדָ֛ם’ā·ḏāma manH120
√ ʼâdâm — ruddy iNounmasculine singular
ʼâdâm — ruddy; the earth-man The ground of the denial. Poole and Benson both argue that lying and changing of counsel are effects of weakness — a man lies because he cannot otherwise accomplish his design — and God, having absolute power, needs no such artifice.
לְהִנָּחֵֽם׃lə·hin·nā·ḥêmthat He should change His mindH5162
√ nâcham — properly, to sigh, iPreposition-lVerbNifalInfinitive construct
nâcham — to sigh, relent (Nifal infinitive construct) The repetition of the verb within one verse, first as a finite denial and then as an infinitive of capacity, is the writer's way of closing the door: not merely He does not, but He is not the sort of being who does.
The Voices✦ public domain+
It is precisely because God is unchangeable, that in His dealing with men He must seem to change His action as they change their conduct.
signifies constancy, endurance, then confidence, trust, because a man can trust in what is constant.
A phrase which occurs only here. The word means, perpetuity, truth, glory, victory, and trust, or confidence.
Barnes declines to choose among the senses. We keep him in because his refusal is the most accurate report of the lexical evidence, and it checks the confidence of the other voices.
a further rebuke of his pride in rearing the Carmel trophy, and an intimation that no loss would be sustained in Israel by his rejection.
30““I have sinned,” Saul replied. “Please honor me now before the e…”+

30“I have sinned,” Saul replied. “Please honor me now before the elders of my people and before Israel. Come back with me, so that I may worship the LORD your God.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ḥā·ṭā·ṯî way·yō·mer nā kab·bə·ḏê·nî ‘at·tāh ne·ḡeḏ ziq·nê- ‘am·mî wə·ne·ḡeḏ yiś·rā·’êl wə·šūḇ ‘im·mî wə·hiš·ta·ḥă·wê·ṯî Yah·weh ’ĕ·lō·he·ḵā

Literal — word-for-word from the original

And-he-said: “I-have-sinned. Now honour-me, I-pray, before the-elders-of my-people and-before Israel; and-return with-me, and-I-will-bow-myself-down to-YHWH thy-God.”

Where the English smooths the original

  • כַּבְּדֵ֥נִי כַּבְּדֵנִי (kabbəḏênî, H3513 kâbad, Piel imperative) — the root means “to be heavy.” To honour is to give weight. BSB’s “honor me” is correct and colourless; the Hebrew is a demand to be made weighty in public — from a man who has just been told the kingship was torn off him.
  • נֶ֥גֶד נֶגֶד (neḡeḏ, H5048) — “a front,” what is straight in view. Doubled (before the elders, and before Israel), it makes the request explicitly about visibility. The whole petition is staged for eyes.
  • אֱלֹהֶֽיךָ יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ (YHWH ’ĕlōheḵā) — “YHWH thy God,” the second-person suffix, exactly as in v. 15. In v. 25 Saul said simply “to YHWH.” Barnes flags the same phrase; the possessive has drifted to the prophet's side of the sentence, and BSB preserves it, but an English reader can pass over it.
  • וְהִֽשְׁתַּחֲוֵ֖יתִי וְהִשְׁתַּחֲוֵיתִי (wəhištaḥăwêṯî, H7812, Hitpael conjunctive perfect) — where v. 25 had a cohortative (“let me bow down”), here the waw-consecutive perfect makes the prostration a settled consequence of Samuel's returning. The bargain has hardened.
Word by word15 · parsed+
חָטָ֔אתִיḥā·ṭā·ṯîI have sinnedH2398
√ châṭâʼ — properly, to missVerbQalPerfectfirst person common singular
châṭâʼ — to miss (Qal perfect) The second confession, verbally identical to v. 24 but now stripped of the excuse. Gill notes this precisely — “his confession there was attended with an extenuation of his sin… but here it is without any” — and yet judges it less sincere, because of what immediately follows it.
וַיֹּ֣אמֶרway·yō·merSaul repliedH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
נָ֛אPleaseH4994
√ nâʼ — 'I pray', 'now', or 'then'Interjection
כַּבְּדֵ֥נִיkab·bə·ḏê·nîhonor meH3513
√ kâbad — to be heavy, iVerbPielImperativemasculine singularfirst person common singular
kâbad — to be heavy; (Piel) to honour The imperative that unmasks the confession. Kâbad is the root behind kâbôd, glory: Saul asks the prophet to lend him weight before witnesses. Ellicott quotes Gregory: “If Saul had been really penitent, he would pray to have been humble rather than to be honoured.” Cambridge sends the reader to John 5:44 and 12:43 — the love of the glory of men rather than the glory of God — as “the radical defect in Saul's character.”
עַתָּ֗ה‘at·tāhnowH6258
√ ʻattâh — at this time, whether adverb, conjunction or expletiveAdverb
נֶ֥גֶדne·ḡeḏbeforeH5048
√ neged — a front, iPreposition
זִקְנֵֽי־ziq·nê-the eldersH2205
√ zâqên — oldAdjectivemasculine plural construct
zâqên — old; (plural) the elders The standing council of Israel, the body whose opinion could unmake a king in practice long before God's sentence took visible effect. Pulpit argues that Samuel's refusal at this point would have “given an occasion for intrigue and resistance to all who were disaffected.”
עַמִּ֖י‘am·mîof my peopleH5971
√ ʻam — a people (as a congregated unit)Nounmasculine singular constructfirst person common singular
וְנֶ֣גֶדwə·ne·ḡeḏand beforeH5048
√ neged — a front, iConjunctive wawPreposition
יִשְׂרָאֵ֑לyiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
וְשׁ֣וּבwə·šūḇCome backH7725
√ shûwb — to turn back (hence, away) transitively or intransitively, literally or figuratively (not necessarily with the idea of return to the starting point)Conjunctive wawVerbQalImperativemasculine singular
עִמִּ֔י‘im·mîwith meH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iPrepositionfirst person common singular
וְהִֽשְׁתַּחֲוֵ֖יתִיwə·hiš·ta·ḥă·wê·ṯîso that I may worshipH7812
√ shâchâh — to depress, iConjunctive wawVerbHitpaelConjunctive perfectfirst person common singular
לַֽיהוָ֥הYah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
אֱלֹהֶֽיךָ׃’ĕ·lō·he·ḵāyour GodH430
√ ʼĕlôhîym — gods in the ordinary senseNounmasculine plural constructsecond person masculine singular
ʼĕlôhîym — gods in the ordinary sense; God The suffix is the tell. Whatever Saul's theology, his speech puts the God of Israel in Samuel's possession, not his own.
The Voices✦ public domain+
If Saul had been really penitent, he would pray to have been humble rather than to be honoured
Ellicott is quoting St. Gregory at second hand, through Wordsworth; the sentence is patristic, not Victorian.
John 5:44 ; John 12:43 point to the radical defect in Saul’s character.
Here he plainly discovers his hypocrisy, and the true motive of this and his former confession; he was not solicitous for the favour of God, but for his honour and power with Israel.
31“So Samuel went back with Saul, and Saul worshiped the LORD.”+

31So Samuel went back with Saul, and Saul worshiped the LORD.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

šə·mū·’êl way·yā·šāḇ ’a·ḥă·rê šā·’ūl šā·’ūl way·yiš·ta·ḥū Yah·weh

Literal — word-for-word from the original

And-turned-back Samuel after Saul; and-Saul bowed-himself-down to-YHWH.

Where the English smooths the original

  • וַיָּ֥שָׁב וַיָּשָׁב (wayyāšāḇ, H7725 shûwb) — the verb Samuel refused in v. 26 now takes him as its subject. BSB’s “went back with Saul” is smooth; the Hebrew simply repeats shuwb, so that the refusal and the compliance are audibly the same word.
  • אַחֲרֵ֣י אַחֲרֵי שָׁאוּל (’aḥărê šā’ūl, H310 ʼachar, “the hind part”) — “after Saul,” not “with Saul.” BSB’s “with” imports companionship the preposition does not give. Poole builds a whole argument on this: Samuel followed, but “not to worship the Lord with him, for that he did not; and therefore it is here mentioned that Saul only worshipped the Lord.”
  • וַיִּשְׁתַּ֥חוּ וַיִּשְׁתַּחוּ (wayyištaḥū, H7812, Hitpael) — the subject is Saul alone, singular. The narrator is careful; the prostration Saul had twice requested as a joint act is recorded as a solo one.
Word by word7 · parsed+
שְׁמוּאֵ֖לšə·mū·’êlSo SamuelH8050
√ Shᵉmûwʼêl — Shemuel, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיָּ֥שָׁבway·yā·šāḇwent backH7725
√ shûwb — to turn back (hence, away) transitively or intransitively, literally or figuratively (not necessarily with the idea of return to the starting point)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
shûwb — to turn back Three occurrences of this root in eight verses (Saul's plea, Samuel's refusal, Samuel's act) trace the scene's whole arc. Benson, Poole, JFB, Gill, Cambridge and K&D are unanimous on the motive: not fellowship, but the preservation of public order and the execution of the ban Saul had neglected.
אַחֲרֵ֣י’a·ḥă·rêwithH310
√ ʼachar — properly, the hind partPreposition
ʼachar — properly, the hind part A preposition of following, not of accompaniment. The grammar keeps Samuel behind Saul rather than beside him.
שָׁא֑וּלšā·’ūlSaulH7586
√ Shâʼûwl — Shaul, the name of an Edomite and two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
שָׁא֖וּלšā·’ūland SaulH7586
√ Shâʼûwl — Shaul, the name of an Edomite and two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיִּשְׁתַּ֥חוּway·yiš·ta·ḥūworshipedH7812
√ shâchâh — to depress, iConjunctive wawVerbHitpaelConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
shâchâh — to prostrate oneself (Hitpael) The last recorded act of worship by Saul in this narrative, and the narrator gives it without comment. Barnes observes the pathos from the other side: “The pertinacity with which Saul clings to Samuel for support is a striking testimony to Samuel's integrity.”
לַֽיהוָֽה׃סYah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
The Voices✦ public domain+
That the people might not, upon pretence of this sentence of rejection, withdraw their obedience from their sovereign; whereby they would both have sinned against God, and have been as sheep without a shepherd.
and remained whilst Saul worshipped, not merely "for the purpose of preserving the outward order until a new king should take his place" (O. v. Gerlach), but also to carry out the ban upon Agag, whom Saul had spared.
The pertinacity with which Saul clings to Samuel for support is a striking testimony to Samuel's integrity.
32“Then Samuel said, “Bring me Agag king of the Amalekites.” Agag c…”+

32Then Samuel said, “Bring me Agag king of the Amalekites.” Agag came to him cheerfully, for he thought, “Surely the bitterness of death is past.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

šə·mū·’êl way·yō·mer hag·gî·šū ’ê·lay ’eṯ- ’ă·ḡaḡ me·leḵ ‘ă·mā·lêq ’ă·ḡaḡ way·yê·leḵ ’ê·lāw ma·‘ă·ḏan·nōṯ ’ă·ḡāḡ way·yō·mer ’ā·ḵên mar- ham·mā·weṯ sār

Literal — word-for-word from the original

And-said Samuel: “Bring-near unto-me Agag king-of Amalek.” And-came unto-him Agag maʻădannōṯ; and-said Agag: “Surely hath-turned-aside the-bitterness of-death.”

Where the English smooths the original

  • מַעֲדַנֹּ֑ת מַעֲדַנֹּת (ma‘ăḏannōṯ, H4575) — the single most uncertain word in the unit, and BSB’s “cheerfully” hides the uncertainty entirely. Its only other canonical occurrence, Job 38:31, means bands or chains; the LXX read “trembling,” the Vulgate rendered it twice over (“sleek and trembling”), and the Syriac dropped it. Pulpit argues for “in fetters”; K&D, Benson, Poole, Gill and JFB for cheerfulness. We leave it untranslated.
  • הַגִּ֤ישׁוּ הַגִּישׁוּ (haggîšū, H5066 nâgash, Hifil imperative plural) — “cause to draw near.” The verb is the ordinary one for presenting an offering at the altar. Samuel is standing at Gilgal where Saul has just sacrificed, and he uses sanctuary language to summon a man. BSB’s “Bring me Agag” is accurate and loses the liturgical colouring.
  • סָ֥ר סָר (sār, H5493 çûwr, Qal perfect) — “has turned aside, departed.” BSB’s “is past” reads it as time elapsed; the Hebrew verb is spatial — the bitterness has stepped out of the way. Agag speaks as of a thing that moved off a road, which is exactly the hope that is about to be disappointed.
  • אָכֵ֖ן אָכֵן (’āḵên, H403, “firmly”) — an adverb of asseveration, but one Hebrew often uses when a speaker is bracing himself. Pulpit hears it exactly so: “Though put affirmatively, there is underlying doubt.”
Word by word18 · parsed+
שְׁמוּאֵ֗לšə·mū·’êlThen SamuelH8050
√ Shᵉmûwʼêl — Shemuel, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֹּ֣אמֶרway·yō·mersaidH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
הַגִּ֤ישׁוּhag·gî·šūBringH5066
√ nâgash — to be or come (causatively, bring) near (for any purpose)VerbHifilImperativemasculine plural
nâgash — to be or come (causatively, bring) near (Hifil) The verb of approach to holy things. Its use here, at the altar at Gilgal, sets Agag's execution inside the frame of the ḥērem rather than of ordinary justice; K&D says the slaying “being the execution of the ban, was an act performed for the glory of God.”
אֵלַי֙’ê·laymeH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPrepositionfirst person common singular
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
אֲגַג֙’ă·ḡaḡAgagH90
√ ʼĂgag — Agag, a title of Amalekitish kingsNounpropermasculine singular
ʼĂgag — Agag, a title of Amalekitish kings A dynastic title rather than a personal name, which is why the lexicon glosses it as a title. It stands in only six verses in the canon, one of them Balaam's oracle that Israel's king would be “higher than Agag.”
מֶ֣לֶךְme·leḵkingH4428
√ melek — a kingNounmasculine singular construct
עֲמָלֵ֔ק‘ă·mā·lêqof the AmalekitesH6002
√ ʻĂmâlêq — Amalek, a descendant of EsauNounpropermasculine singular
אֲגַ֖ג’ă·ḡaḡAgagH90
√ ʼĂgag — Agag, a title of Amalekitish kingsNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֵּ֣לֶךְway·yê·leḵcameH1980
√ hâlak — to walk (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
אֵלָ֔יו’ê·lāwto himH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPrepositionthird person masculine singular
מַעֲדַנֹּ֑תma·‘ă·ḏan·nōṯcheerfullyH4575
√ maʻădannâh — a bond, iAdverb
maʻădannâh — a bond The lexicon's own gloss is “a bond,” which sides with Job 38:31 and with Pulpit against the common English rendering. That the standard lexical gloss and the standard English translation point opposite ways is itself the honest state of the evidence here.
אֲגָ֔ג’ă·ḡāḡfor heH90
√ ʼĂgag — Agag, a title of Amalekitish kingsNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֹּ֣אמֶרway·yō·merthoughtH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
אָכֵ֖ן’ā·ḵênSurelyH403
√ ʼâkên — firmlyAdverb
מַר־mar-the bitternessH4751
√ mar — bitter (literally or figuratively)Adjectivemasculine singular construct
mar — bitter (literally or figuratively) The construct mar-hammāweṯ, “the bitterness of death,” is the phrase that outlived this verse in English proverb. Henry turns it on the reader: “Many think the bitterness of death is past when it is not gone by; they put that evil day far from them, which is very near.”
הַמָּֽוֶת׃סham·mā·weṯof deathH4194
√ mâveth — death (natural or violent)ArticleNounmasculine singular
סָ֥רsāris pastH5493
√ çûwr — to turn off (literal or figurative)VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
çûwr — to turn off (literal or figurative) A verb of departure, in the perfect: Agag states it as accomplished fact. K&D reads the whole sentence as a reasonable inference rather than bravado — he had not been killed at once, and was now being presented to a prophet.
The Voices✦ public domain+
The very word, however, occurs in Job 38:31 , where the A.V. renders it bands , and this seems the right sense
not from any special pleasure at the thought of death, or from a heroic contempt of death, but because he thought that his life was to be granted him
Many think the bitterness of death is past when it is not gone by; they put that evil day far from them, which is very near.
33“But Samuel declared: “As your sword has made women childless, so…”+

33But Samuel declared: “As your sword has made women childless, so your mother will be childless among women.” And Samuel hacked Agag to pieces before the LORD at Gilgal.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

šə·mū·’êl way·yō·mer ka·’ă·šer ḥar·be·ḵā nā·šîm šik·kə·lāh kên- ’im·me·ḵā tiš·kal min·nā·šîm šə·mū·’êl ’eṯ- ’ă·ḡāḡ way·šas·sêp̄ lip̄·nê Yah·weh bag·gil·gāl

Literal — word-for-word from the original

And-said Samuel: “As hath-bereaved-of-children women thy-sword, so shall-be-bereaved-of-children among-women thy-mother.” And-hewed-in-pieces Samuel Agag before YHWH in-Gilgal.

Where the English smooths the original

  • שִׁכְּלָ֤ה שִׁכְּלָה (šikkəlāh, H7921 shâkôl, Piel) — the root means properly “to miscarry,” to be made childless by loss. BSB’s “made women childless” is right; what the Piel adds is causation with intent. Gill notes the women were bereaved “not of their children only, but of their husbands also, and so made them both childless and widows.”
  • מִנָּשִׁ֖ים מִנָּשִׁים (minnāšîm) — BSB reads the min as partitive, “among women.” K&D reads it as comparative and takes the whole as a superlative: “more childless than (other) women, i.e., the most childless of women, namely, because her son was the king.” Both are grammatically open; the English fixes one.
  • וַיְשַׁסֵּ֨ף וַיְשַׁסֵּף (wayšassêp̄, H8158 shâçaph, Piel) — a hapax legomenon; it occurs nowhere else in the Hebrew Bible. Barnes: “Only found in this passage.” Cambridge: it “occurs nowhere else. It may perhaps mean no more than ‘executed’ (Sept. ἔσφαξε ).” Every English rendering of “hewed in pieces” descends from the Vulgate's in frusta concidit, not from known Hebrew usage.
  • לִפְנֵ֥י לִפְנֵי יְהוָה (lip̄nê YHWH) — literally “to the face of YHWH.” The noun is pānîm, faces, plural. BSB’s “before the LORD” is standard and correct; the Hebrew idiom makes the execution an act done in a face's presence, which is why Poole and Gill debate whether the ark or the altar was physically there.
Word by word17 · parsed+
שְׁמוּאֵ֔לšə·mū·’êlBut SamuelH8050
√ Shᵉmûwʼêl — Shemuel, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֹּ֣אמֶרway·yō·merdeclaredH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
כַּאֲשֶׁ֨רka·’ă·šerAsH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPreposition-kPronounrelative
חַרְבֶּ֔ךָḥar·be·ḵāyour swordH2719
√ chereb — droughtNounfeminine singular constructsecond person masculine singular
chereb — drought; a sword The noun's root sense is dryness and desolation, which is why the same word covers a sword and a wasteland. Making it the subject of the bereaving verb is the sentence's hinge: not Agag but his sword is arraigned, and the punishment is then fitted to it.
נָשִׁים֙nā·šîmhas made womenH802
√ ʼishshâh — a womanNounfeminine plural
שִׁכְּלָ֤הšik·kə·lāhchildlessH7921
√ shâkôl — properly, to miscarry, iVerbPielPerfectthird person feminine singular
shâkôl — properly, to miscarry (Piel) Repeated in the next clause as a Qal imperfect with Agag's mother as subject: the identical root, active then passive, is the grammar of the lex talionis. Cambridge: “By the law of retaliation Agag's life was forfeit. Cp. Jdg 1:7.” Poole adds the historical defence: Agag is not punished for ancestors four centuries dead, but as “one that allowed and persisted in the same evil courses.”
כֵּן־kên-soH3651
√ kên — properly, set uprightAdverb
אִמֶּ֑ךָ’im·me·ḵāyour motherH517
√ ʼêm — a mother (as the bond of the family)Nounfeminine singular constructsecond person masculine singular
תִּשְׁכַּ֥לtiš·kalwill be childlessH7921
√ shâkôl — properly, to miscarry, iVerbQalImperfectthird person feminine singular
מִנָּשִׁ֖יםmin·nā·šîmamong womenH802
√ ʼishshâh — a womanPreposition-mNounfeminine plural
שְׁמוּאֵ֧לšə·mū·’êlAnd SamuelH8050
√ Shᵉmûwʼêl — Shemuel, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
אֲגָ֛ג’ă·ḡāḡhacked AgagH90
√ ʼĂgag — Agag, a title of Amalekitish kingsNounpropermasculine singular
וַיְשַׁסֵּ֨ףway·šas·sêp̄to piecesH8158
√ shâçaph — to cut in pieces, iConjunctive wawVerbPielConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
shâçaph — to cut in pieces A hapax, and the commentators know it. Ellicott and Pulpit both guess at a specific judicial method (Pulpit: “like the quartering of the middle ages”); Pulpit adds that the Piel stem may mean Samuel “commanded it to be done” rather than did it himself. Gill canvasses the possibilities at length and concludes he cannot say. ⚙ The honest position is that we do not know what was done to Agag, only that the ban was carried out.
לִפְנֵ֥יlip̄·nêbeforeH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNouncommon plural construct
יְהוָ֖הYah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
בַּגִּלְגָּֽל׃סbag·gil·gālat GilgalH1537
√ Gilgâl — Gilgal, the name of three places in PalestinePreposition-b, ArticleNounproperfeminine singular
Gilgâl — Gilgal The place where Saul had been confirmed king (1 Samuel 11:15) and where he had earlier forfeited a dynasty by sacrificing without Samuel (1 Samuel 13). The chapter's judgment falls where the reign was made.
The Voices✦ public domain+
From these words of Samuel, it is very evident that Agag had carried on his wars with great cruelty, and had therefore forfeited his life according to the lex talionis.
which Saul had violated, and so both saved the nation from the guilt of a broken oath, and gave a final example to Saul, but apparently in vain, of uncompromising obedience to the commandments of God. There is something awful in the majesty of the prophet rising above and eclipsing that of the king
But these are no precedents for private persons to take the sword of justice into their hands; for we must live by thee laws of God, and not by extraordinary examples.
Poole defends the act as done by express divine command and in the same breath forbids its imitation. We keep both halves together, because quoting either alone misrepresents him.
34“Then Samuel went to Ramah, but Saul went up to his home in Gibea…”+

34Then Samuel went to Ramah, but Saul went up to his home in Gibeah of Saul.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

šə·mū·’êl way·yê·leḵ hā·rā·mā·ṯāh wə·šā·’ūl ‘ā·lāh ’el- bê·ṯōw giḇ·‘aṯ šā·’ūl

Literal — word-for-word from the original

And-went Samuel to-Ramah; and-Saul went-up unto-his-house, to-Gibeah-of-Saul.

Where the English smooths the original

  • עָלָ֥ה עָלָה (‘ālāh, H5927) — “went up, ascended,” against Samuel's plain wayyêleḵ (“went”). BSB keeps “went up,” but an English reader hears only topography. Gibeah sits high; the verb is also the standard one for going up to worship, and the writer has just refused to say that Samuel worshipped with Saul.
  • הָרָמָ֑תָה הָרָמָתָה (hārāmāṯāh) — the he-locale ending, “to-Ramah,” a directional suffix English can only render with a preposition. The name itself means “the height.” Both men go up; they go up to different heights.
  • גִּבְעַ֥ת גִּבְעַת שָׁאוּל (giḇ‘aṯ šā’ūl) — “Gibeah of Saul,” a construct that attaches the king's name to the town. BSB renders it faithfully, but the effect is easy to miss: the last thing said of Saul in this chapter's narrative is that he went home to a place called by his own name.
Word by word9 · parsed+
שְׁמוּאֵ֖לšə·mū·’êlThen SamuelH8050
√ Shᵉmûwʼêl — Shemuel, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֵּ֥לֶךְway·yê·leḵwentH1980
√ hâlak — to walk (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
hâlak — to walk (in a great variety of applications) The plainest verb in Hebrew, and here it does the work of a closing curtain: the prophet simply walks away.
הָרָמָ֑תָהhā·rā·mā·ṯāhto RamahH7414
√ Râmâh — Ramah, the name of four places in PalestineArticleNounproperfeminine singularthird person feminine singular
וְשָׁא֛וּלwə·šā·’ūlbut SaulH7586
√ Shâʼûwl — Shaul, the name of an Edomite and two IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
עָלָ֥ה‘ā·lāhwent upH5927
√ ʻâlâh — to ascend, intransitively (be high) or actively (mount)VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
ʻâlâh — to ascend, intransitively (be high) or actively (mount) Saul's exit verb. K&D reads the whole verse as the formal end of the relationship: “From that time forward Samuel broke off all intercourse with the king whom Jehovah had rejected.”
אֶל־’el-toH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPreposition
בֵּית֖וֹbê·ṯōwhis homeH1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
bayith — a house (especially family) The same noun means dynasty. Saul goes up to his bayith in the narrow sense in the same chapter in which his bayith in the large sense is refused a future; JFB notes the sentence fell on “Saul and his family.”
גִּבְעַ֥תgiḇ·‘aṯin GibeahH1390
√ Gibʻâh — GibahNounproperfeminine singular
שָׁאֽוּל׃šā·’ūlof SaulH7586
√ Shâʼûwl — Shaul, the name of an Edomite and two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
The Voices✦ public domain+
which was also his birth place, and where was his father's house, and where he had his palace, and kept his court
he returned to his own home at Ramah; and Saul went to his house at Gibeah. From that time forward Samuel broke off all intercourse with the king whom Jehovah had rejected.
Saul seems unconcerned at the token of God's displeasure which he lay under, yet Samuel mourns day and night for him.
35“And to the day of his death, Samuel never again visited Saul. Sa…”+

35And to the day of his death, Samuel never again visited Saul. Samuel mourned for Saul, and the LORD regretted that He had made Saul king over Israel.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

‘aḏ- yō·wm mō·w·ṯōw kî- šə·mū·’êl wə·lō- yā·sap̄ lir·’ō·wṯ ’eṯ- šā·’ūl šə·mū·’êl hiṯ·’ab·bêl ’el- šā·’ūl Yah·weh ni·ḥām kî- šā·’ūl him·lîḵ ’eṯ- ‘al- yiś·rā·’êl

Literal — word-for-word from the original

And-not did-add Samuel to-see Saul until the-day-of his-death; for Samuel mourned over Saul, and-YHWH had-relented that He-had-made-Saul-king over Israel.

Where the English smooths the original

  • יָסַ֨ף וְלֹא־יָסַף … לִרְאוֹת (wəlō-yāsap̄ … lir’ōwṯ, H3254 yâçaph with an infinitive) — a Hebrew idiom for “did not do it again.” BSB’s “never again visited” is idiomatic English; Gill gives the wooden form, “added not to see him,” which is what lets Poole and Benson square the statement with the later meeting at 1 Samuel 19:24.
  • לִרְא֤וֹת לִרְאוֹת (lir’ōwṯ, H7200 râʼâh, “to see”) — the verb is plain seeing; BSB supplies “visited,” an interpretation. Poole defends it (“Seeing is put for visiting here , and 2 Kings 8:29 ”), but the reader should know the Hebrew says only “to see.”
  • הִתְאַבֵּ֥ל הִתְאַבֵּל (hiṯ’abbêl, H56 ʼâbal, Hitpael) — “to bewail,” in the reflexive stem: to put oneself into mourning, the formal grief performed for the dead. BSB’s “mourned for Saul” is correct and understated; the stem means Samuel conducted funeral grief over a man still alive and still on the throne.
  • נִחָ֔ם נִחָם (niḥām, H5162 nâcham, Nifal perfect) — the identical root and stem that v. 29 denied of God six verses earlier. BSB renders it “regretted” here and “change His mind” there, which quietly softens a collision the Hebrew makes unmissable by using one word twice.
Word by word22 · parsed+
עַד־‘aḏ-And toH5704
√ ʻad — as far (or long, or much) as, whether of space (even unto) or time (during, while, until) or degree (equally with)Preposition
י֣וֹםyō·wmthe dayH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)Nounmasculine singular construct
מוֹת֔וֹmō·w·ṯōwof his deathH4194
√ mâveth — death (natural or violent)Nounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
כִּֽי־kî-. . .H3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
שְׁמוּאֵ֜לšə·mū·’êlSamuelH8050
√ Shᵉmûwʼêl — Shemuel, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וְלֹא־wə·lō-neverH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absConjunctive wawAdverbNegative particle
יָסַ֨ףyā·sap̄againH3254
√ yâçaph — to add or augment (often adverbial, to continue to do a thing)VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
yâçaph — to add or augment (often adverbial, to continue to do a thing) The idiom governs the whole clause. Barnes: “In the sense of visiting or conversing on public affairs.” Benson and Poole both note the qualification the Hebrew allows — they did meet once more (1 Samuel 19:24), but that meeting was Saul's doing.
לִרְא֤וֹתlir·’ō·wṯvisitedH7200
√ râʼâh — to see, literally or figuratively (in numerous applications, direct and implied, transitive, intransitive and causative)Preposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
שָׁאוּל֙šā·’ūlSaulH7586
√ Shâʼûwl — Shaul, the name of an Edomite and two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
שְׁמוּאֵ֖לšə·mū·’êlSamuelH8050
√ Shᵉmûwʼêl — Shemuel, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
הִתְאַבֵּ֥לhiṯ·’ab·bêlmournedH56
√ ʼâbal — to bewailVerbHitpaelPerfectthird person masculine singular
ʼâbal — to bewail (Hitpael) The stem of formal, self-imposed mourning. That it is aimed at a living king is the verse's quiet devastation: Samuel treats the reign as a death. Ellicott's reading of the grief is the fullest in the apparatus, and it is not sentimental — he sees in it both love for the man and the beginning of a physician's fear about Saul's mind.
אֶל־’el-forH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPreposition
שָׁא֑וּלšā·’ūlSaulH7586
√ Shâʼûwl — Shaul, the name of an Edomite and two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיהוָ֣הYah·wehand the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
נִחָ֔םni·ḥāmregrettedH5162
√ nâcham — properly, to sigh, iVerbNifalPerfectthird person masculine singular
nâcham — properly, to sigh (Nifal perfect) The chapter's last theological word, and it contradicts v. 29 at the level of the lexeme, not merely of the sense. Gill draws the practical conclusion: neither Saul's confession nor Samuel's grief “altered his mind.” Cambridge's counsel elsewhere in this chapter holds here too — Scripture states both sides and leaves the reconciling to conscience.
כִּֽי־kî-thatH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
שָׁא֖וּלšā·’ūlHe had made SaulH7586
√ Shâʼûwl — Shaul, the name of an Edomite and two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
הִמְלִ֥יךְhim·lîḵkingH4427
√ mâlak — to reignVerbHifilPerfectthird person masculine singular
mâlak — to reign (Hifil) Causative: “He had caused Saul to reign.” The sentence names God as the one who made this king, in the same clause in which He sighs over having done it. The writer will not let the reader detach the making from the regret.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
עַל־‘al-overH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃פyiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
The Voices✦ public domain+
This first great king only lacked one thing: true faith in that God who loved Israel with a peculiar love.
Saul was no longer the representative of Jehovah, and consequently Samuel no more came to him, bearing messages and commands, and giving him counsel and guidance from God.
because of his sin, his impenitence, and hypocrisy; and because of the loss of the kingdom to him, and to his posterity

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read wholesynthesis · verify+

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. The confession that will not let go of the crown — 15:24–15:26

Saul's words are formally perfect: חָטָאתִי (ḥāṭā’ṯî) — “I have missed.” What follows them is the problem. He names his trespass as a crossing-over (‘āḇartî) of פִּי־יְהוָה, the mouth of YHWH, and then immediately supplies a cause: “because I feared the people and hearkened to their voice.” Ellicott hears the self-defence inside the confession — “all that he could allege in excuse only more plainly marked out his unfitness for his high post.” Poole disbelieves the excuse outright and sends the reader to 1 Samuel 11:7 and 14:24, where this same king cowed the nation at will; the true cause, Poole says, “was his covetousness, and because he did not fear God.” K&D judges it “rather the effect of alarm at the rejection which had been announced to him, than the fruit of any genuine consciousness of sin,” and reinforces the point with Cornelius a Lapide's phrase, “repentance of the lips.” Against this near-consensus stands Benson, who will not have it: “It does by no means appear that Saul acts the hypocrite herein… Rather, he nakedly declares the thing as it was.” ⚙ The Hebrew does not decide between them. What the Hebrew does show is a grammatical displacement: yārê’ṯî ’eṯ-hā‘ām puts the people in the object slot of the verb of the fear of God, and wā’ešma‘ bəqōlām gives to their voice the obedience the chapter demanded for YHWH's. Barnes frames the theological question that the unit never closes: why was this confession unavailing when David's was not? His answer — “Saul only shrank from the punishment of his sin. David shrank in abhorrence from the sin itself” — is a judgment about interiors, offered honestly as such.

ii. An accident in a fist, a verdict in heaven — 15:27–15:28

The most important word in this unit is a verb stem. In v. 27 the robe is torn in the Nifal: וַיִּקָּרַע, “and it was torn.” K&D defends that passive against the Septuagint's active reading and against Thenius's proposed emendation, and everything hangs on it — “the tearing of the mantle, which took place accidentally, and evidently without any such intention on the part of Saul, was to serve as a sign of the rending away of the sovereignty from him.” In v. 28 Samuel takes the identical root qâraʻ and puts it in the Qal perfect with YHWH as its subject and in the emphatic first position: qāra‘ YHWH. The accident is declared to have been the announcement. Pulpit, reading the garment closely, insists it was the meil and not a prophet's addereth, and that because the meil fitted close to the body, the tearing “implies a considerable amount of violence on Saul's part”; Ellicott follows Payne Smith on the same point. Cambridge supplies the canonical parallel — “Compare Ahijah's symbolical action ( 1 Kings 11:30-31 )” — and Gill the same, noting that “by a like sign was signified the rending of the ten tribes from the kingdom of Solomon.” The recipient is left deliberately blank: לְרֵעֲךָ, “to thy associate.” K&D: “Samuel did not yet know to whom Jehovah would give it.” Geneva's marginal gloss supplies the name — “That is, to David” — but supplies it, as a gloss, from later knowledge.

iii. The Enduring One of Israel, and the verb that will not sit still — 15:29

Here the text sets a trap for any reader who wants a tidy doctrine cheaply. Verse 11 said YHWH nâchamed that He had made Saul king; verse 35 will say it again; verse 29 says He does not and cannot nâcham, because He is not אָדָם. The title carrying that claim, נֵצַח יִשְׂרָאֵל, occurs nowhere else in Scripture, and the commentators cannot agree on it. K&D argues from the root's sense of constancy for “the unchangeable One, in whom Israel can trust,” and rejects the sense gloria as Aramaising and “altogether unsuitable here.” Ellicott would render “the Changeless One of Israel.” JFB and Pulpit take it as Israel's Victory or Triumph, and JFB reads it as “a further rebuke of his pride in rearing the Carmel trophy.” Gill lists strength, victory and eternity together. Barnes gives the most disciplined answer of all: the phrase “occurs only here,” and the word “means, perpetuity, truth, glory, victory, and trust, or confidence.” On the contradiction itself, the traditional solution — v. 11 spoken ἀνθρωποπαθῶς, v. 29 θεοπρεπῶς — is stated by K&D and by Cambridge; but Cambridge refuses to let it settle the matter: “This is only a partial solution. It is precisely because God is unchangeable, that in His dealing with men He must seem to change His action as they change their conduct… Scripture is content to state both sides of the question, and leave conscience rather than reason to reconcile them.” ⚙ We take Cambridge's restraint as the model. The second verb in the line is the harder guarantee: יְשַׁקֵּר (shâqar) is a rare covenant word, and its most striking other use is God's oath about the house of David — “nor will I deal falsely in my faithfulness” (Psalm 89:33). The sentence that removes one king rests on the character that will secure another.

iv. Weight before the elders — 15:30–15:31

Saul confesses a second time, now without the excuse — Gill notices this exactly — and then asks for the one thing that exposes him: כַּבְּדֵנִי, “make me weighty,” before the elders and before Israel. Ellicott, quoting Gregory through Wordsworth, puts it in a line: “If Saul had been really penitent, he would pray to have been humble rather than to be honoured.” Cambridge points to John 5:44 and 12:43 as naming “the radical defect in Saul's character”; Poole says the request “plainly discovers his hypocrisy.” And Samuel goes. The commentators are unanimous about why, and none of them says fellowship: Benson and Poole give two reasons, that the people might not withdraw obedience from their king and “have been as sheep without a shepherd,” and that Samuel might “rectify Saul's error, and execute God's judgment upon Agag”; JFB and Cambridge agree; K&D adds O. v. Gerlach's phrase about “preserving the outward order until a new king should take his place,” and then the same second reason, the ban. ⚙ The Hebrew reinforces the coldness: Samuel turned back ’aḥărê Saul, behind him, and the prostration in the next clause has one subject only.

v. The ban executed by the man who never held the sword — 15:32–15:33

Agag comes מַעֲדַנֹּת (ma‘ăḏannōṯ) — a word that occurs in only one other verse in the canon, Job 38:31, where it means the bands of the Pleiades. The versions split irreconcilably. Pulpit argues from Job for “in fetters,” and says the cheerful reading “is contradicted by the next clause.” Cambridge reports the evidence without deciding: “The Sept. has ‘trembling;’ the Vulg. a curious double rendering, ‘sleek and trembling.’” Barnes calls the phrase “very obscure.” K&D, Benson, Poole, Gill and JFB take it as cheerfulness, K&D adding that it was “not from any special pleasure at the thought of death, or from a heroic contempt of death, but because he thought that his life was to be granted him.” ⚙ We do not resolve it, and the reader should know the English rendering is a choice. What is not obscure is the sentence: ka’ăšer šikkəlāh nāšîm ḥarbeḵā — “as thy sword has bereaved women.” K&D: “it is very evident that Agag had carried on his wars with great cruelty, and had therefore forfeited his life according to the lex talionis.” Then the prophet does what the king would not. Barnes measures it exactly: Samuel “executed the חרם chērem… which Saul had violated, and so both saved the nation from the guilt of a broken oath… There is something awful in the majesty of the prophet rising above and eclipsing that of the king.” Poole, who defends the act as done by express command, immediately fences it: “these are no precedents for private persons to take the sword of justice into their hands.”

vi. Two men go home, and one of them mourns — 15:34–15:35

The narrative separates them geographically before it separates them theologically: Samuel to Ramah, Saul up to his house at Gibeah of Saul — a town, as Gill notes, that carried the king's own name. Then v. 35 closes three things at once. Samuel “added not again to see Saul unto the day of his death”; Poole and Benson both insist the idiom means visiting, counselling, seeking God for him, since they did meet once more at 1 Samuel 19:24, and, as Benson notes, that meeting was Saul's doing, not Samuel's. Pulpit reads the deeper sense: “Saul was no longer the representative of Jehovah, and consequently Samuel no more came to him, bearing messages and commands, and giving him counsel and guidance from God.” Samuel הִתְאַבֵּל — the Hitpael of ʼâbal, mourning as for the dead, performed upon himself. Ellicott's account of that grief is the most humane thing in the whole apparatus: Samuel “had known Saul from the days of his splendid youthful promise… This first great king only lacked one thing: true faith in that God who loved Israel with a peculiar love.” And the last clause returns the verb of v. 29 — wa-YHWH niḥām. Verse 29 denied it; verse 35 asserts it; the book lets both stand on the same page.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested against the text. The unit is organised around three things that are torn, and the order matters. First a robe tears in a Nifal — no one tore it; it was torn. Then a kingdom is declared torn in a Qal perfect, with YHWH as subject, and the thing that happened by accident in a man's fist is revealed to have already been decided. Third, and unnamed, a friendship tears: Samuel goes home to Ramah and mourns a living man as though burying him. Underneath all three lies the chapter's real subject, which is not disobedience but weight. Saul feared the people because their opinion was heavy to him and God's mouth was light; and the last thing he asks for, after everything is lost, is kabbədênî — make me heavy, in front of the elders, in front of Israel. He wants the glory (kâbôd) he spent the kingdom to keep. ⚙ Here is what I think verse 29 is doing in the middle of this, and I hold it loosely, because Cambridge is right that Scripture states both sides and leaves conscience to reconcile them. Verse 29 is not a philosophical aside about divine immutability dropped into a narrative. It is an answer to a specific question Saul has just asked. Saul has asked Samuel to get the sentence lifted. Samuel answers that the One who gave it is nêṣaḥ yiśrā’êl, and that He does not shâqar — the rare covenant verb of breaking faith with someone you swore to. That is to say: the reason the sentence cannot be negotiated is the same reason any promise of God can be trusted at all. The unchangeableness that is Saul's doom is Israel's only security, and, when the throne passes to the unnamed neighbour, David's. Verse 11 and verse 35 say God sighed over Saul. Verse 29 says God is not the kind of being whose purposes sigh. ⚙ I do not think the writer was embarrassed by putting those two on one page; I think he knew that a God who could not grieve would not be worth obeying, and a God who could be talked out of a verdict would not be worth trusting.

⚙ Not a verse — a fallible editorial line: the same unchangeableness that made Saul's sentence irreversible is the only reason any promise of God is worth anything.

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripturecross-refs · verify+

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

Cheerfully, or in chains? The one other verse that holds this word verbal / quotation — confirmed

The adverb describing how Agag came, מַעֲדַנֹּת (ma‘ăḏannōṯ, H4575), stands in only two verses in the whole Hebrew Bible. The other is Job 38:31, where God asks whether Job can loose the bands of Orion or bind the chains of the Pleiades. Pulpit takes that as decisive — “The very word, however, occurs in Job 38:31 , where the A.V. renders it bands , and this seems the right sense: ‘Agag came unto him in fetters.’” Ellicott allows the derivation but prefers “cheerfully”; Cambridge reports the Septuagint's “trembling” and the Vulgate's doubled “sleek and trembling” and declines to choose; Barnes calls it “very obscure.” ⚙ The Verifier confirms the lexeme is shared and rare; what it cannot do is tell us which sense the writer intended. Every English Bible here is making a decision the Hebrew does not force.

Job 38:31

basis: Verifier: shared rare Hebrew lexeme H4575 maʻădannâh (in 2 vv) — this unit and Job 38:31 are the only two occurrences in the canon; a genuine verbal link, though no quotation in either direction is claimed

“He will not deal falsely” — the six verses that hold shâqar verbal / quotation — confirmed

The verb Samuel uses for what God does not do, יְשַׁקֵּר (shâqar, H8266), is rare: six verses. Its company is instructive. Abimelech makes Abraham swear not to shâqar with him (Genesis 21:23); Israel is forbidden it in the holiness code (Leviticus 19:11); the psalmist protests that the nation has not shâqared in God's covenant though crushed (Psalm 44:17); Isaiah recalls God saying of His people “they will not deal falsely” (Isaiah 63:8); and in Psalm 89:33, in the middle of the oracle about David's throne, God swears that He will not shâqar in His faithfulness. ⚙ That last is the one to sit with. The same rare verb whose denial seals Saul's rejection is the verb whose denial secures the dynasty of the neighbour “better than thou.” One king loses a throne on God's unbreakable word; another receives one on the same word.

Psalm 89:33 · Isaiah 63:8 · Genesis 21:23 · Leviticus 19:11 · Psalm 44:17

basis: Verifier: shared rare Hebrew lexeme H8266 shâqar (in 6 vv) across all five listed verses — verbal link on a rare covenant verb; no quotation is claimed in either direction

The wing of the robe, torn and cut structural / thematic — confirmed

What Saul seizes is the כְּנַף (kânâph, H3671) of Samuel's מְעִיל (mᵉʻîyl, H4598), and it tears. Nine chapters later, in a cave at En-gedi, David cuts the kânâph of Saul's mᵉʻîyl and his heart smites him for it (1 Samuel 24:4–5). Cambridge notes the parallel at this verse (“Cp. 1 Samuel 24:4”), and Gill reports a rabbinic tradition that read the sign in exactly that direction — “he that cut off the skirt of his garment should reign in his stead” — while himself holding to the plain sense that Saul tore Samuel's. ⚙ The narrative symmetry is hard to miss: the king who tore a prophet's hem to keep a kingdom loses it; the man who cut a king's hem and repented of it receives one. But the tiering must stay honest — both nouns are moderately common, and no quotation is involved.

1 Samuel 24:4

basis: Verifier (pair check, 1 Samuel 15:27 ↔ 1 Samuel 24:4): shared Hebrew lexemes H4598 mᵉʻîyl (in 27 vv) and H3671 kânâph (in 85 vv) — a real verbal contact inside a shared narrative motif, but neither lexeme is rare enough to carry a verbal-quotation claim; Cambridge and Gill both record the cross-reference

Ahijah's ten pieces — a torn garment as a torn kingdom structural / thematic — confirmed

Both Gill and Cambridge send the reader from Samuel's torn hem to Ahijah the Shilonite, who tore his new garment into twelve pieces and gave ten to Jeroboam with the words “I will rend the kingdom out of the hand of Solomon.” Gill: “by a like sign was signified the rending of the ten tribes from the kingdom of Solomon in his son Rehoboam, 1 Kings 11:30 .” ⚙ The two scenes are not related by shared vocabulary in the Verifier's candidate list; they are related as a genre — the prophetic sign-act, in which a garment is destroyed so that a dynasty's fate can be seen rather than merely heard. The difference is worth holding: Ahijah tore deliberately, Samuel's robe tore by accident in another man's hand.

1 Kings 11:30-31

basis: Shared prophetic sign-act pattern (a garment rent to signify a kingdom rent), recorded by Gill and Cambridge as a cross-reference at this verse; the Verifier's candidate list for this unit did not surface a shared-lexeme basis, so the basis here is the pattern plus the commentators' citation, not a computed verbal link

“God is not a man, that he should lie” — Balaam's oracle beside Samuel's structural / thematic — confirmed

Cambridge notes that the words of v. 29 “closely resemble Numbers 23:19,” and K&D cites the same verse. The resemblance is real: Balaam declares that God is not ’îš that He should lie, nor a son of man that He should repent. ⚙ One honest qualification belongs on this link. The verb for “repent” is the same in both places — nâcham — but the verb for “lie” is not: Numbers 23:19 uses kâzab, while our verse uses the rarer shâqar. So the resemblance is a shared formula about the difference between God and man, not a quotation.

Numbers 23:19

basis: Verifier (pair check, 1 Samuel 15:29 ↔ Numbers 23:19): shared lexemes H5162 nâcham (in 100 vv), H120 ʼâdâm (in 526 vv), H1931 hûwʼ, H3808 lôʼ — a genuine shared formula, but nâcham at 100 verses is not rare enough for a verbal-quotation tier and the two verses use different verbs for 'lie' (kâzab vs H8266 shâqar); Cambridge and K&D both cite the parallel

The sworn word that does not relent — Psalm 110:4 structural / thematic — confirmed

The Nifal יִנָּחֵם that Samuel denies of God in v. 29 reappears, in the same stem and the same negated form, in Psalm 110:4: “YHWH has sworn and will not relent — you are a priest for ever.” ⚙ The theological shape is identical and the direction is opposite. In 1 Samuel 15 the unrelenting word takes a crown away; in Psalm 110 it establishes an unending priesthood by oath. Hebrews later builds its argument for the permanence of Christ's priesthood on precisely that oath and its irrevocability — though that is a New Testament reading of the psalm, not of this chapter.

Psalm 110:4

basis: Verifier (pair check, 1 Samuel 15:29 ↔ Psalm 110:4): shared lexemes H5162 nâcham (in 100 vv) and H3808 lôʼ — the same verb in the same negated Nifal, but at 100 verses the lexeme is not rare, so the link is tiered structural rather than verbal

Worldly grief and godly grief — a cross-Testament reading of Saul's two confessions structural / thematic — confirmed

Barnes puts the question the unit raises but does not answer: why were Saul's repeated confessions unavailing when David's was not? His answer is that “Saul only shrank from the punishment of his sin. David shrank in abhorrence from the sin itself.” ⚙ Paul draws the same distinction in 2 Corinthians 7:10 between the grief that works repentance and the grief of the world that works death, and Hebrews 12:17 describes Esau seeking the blessing with tears and finding no place for a change of mind. Both are offered here as a frame for reading Saul, not as claims that either passage has 1 Samuel 15 in view.

2 Corinthians 7:10 · Hebrews 12:17

basis: Cross-Testament (Greek ↔ Hebrew): no shared Strong's lexeme is possible between these texts, so no verbal tier can be claimed. The basis is a shared motif — remorse over consequence distinguished from repentance over sin — explicitly drawn at this verse by Barnes (citing David, Psalm 51:4) and by Cambridge (2 Samuel 12:13; Psalm 51:4). Neither commentator cites 2 Corinthians 7:10 or Hebrews 12:17; both New Testament references are ⚙ our own, offered as a frame for reading Saul and not as a claim that either passage has this chapter in view

Christ in the Unittypology · verify+

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

“To thy neighbour, better than thou” — the unnamed recipient ancient/widely-held

The oracle leaves the successor deliberately blank: לְרֵעֲךָ הַטּוֹב מִמֶּךָּ, “to thy associate, the good one, more than thou.” K&D is careful that “Samuel did not yet know to whom Jehovah would give it,” and Gill agrees, noting that the summons to Jesse's house comes only afterward. Geneva's margin names David; Poole reasons to the tribe of Judah from geography. ⚙ And the line does not stop at David. Pulpit draws it out explicitly: Saul “laid the foundation for the throne of David, who in so many points was the ideal of the theocratic king; and Israel in like manner prepared the way for the coming of the true Messianic King.” The kingdom taken from the man who feared the people is given to a man after God's own heart, and through him by covenant oath to the Son of David — an oath guaranteed, as Psalm 89:33 says using this chapter's own rare verb, by the God who does not deal falsely. This reading of the Davidic promise as reaching to Christ is the ancient and near-universal one, held in this apparatus by Pulpit and implied by Gill and Geneva.

1 Samuel 16:1 · Psalm 89:33 · Matthew 1:1 · Luke 1:32-33

The prophet who carried out the ban the king refused novel

Barnes sees the point of the Agag scene most clearly: Samuel “executed the חרם chērem 1 Samuel 15:3 which Saul had violated, and so both saved the nation from the guilt of a broken oath, and gave a final example to Saul… of uncompromising obedience to the commandments of God. There is something awful in the majesty of the prophet rising above and eclipsing that of the king.” ⚙ The structure is the one the whole Old Testament keeps repeating: the anointed king fails to do the whole will of God, and someone else must complete it or the nation stands under a broken oath. Henry's closing question at these verses is the same one from the other side — “Do we desire to do the whole will of God?” The office that finally unites the failed king and the obedient prophet in one person, and so leaves nothing for another to complete, is the reason the New Testament speaks of one who came saying “Lo, I come to do thy will, O God.” ⚙ We mark this as our own synthesis: the typological joining of Samuel's completed ban to Christ's completed obedience is a reading, not a citation, and no voice in this apparatus makes it in these terms.

Hebrews 10:7 · John 4:34 · Philippians 2:8

Samuel mourning a living king ancient/widely-held

Samuel הִתְאַבֵּל over Saul — the Hitpael of ʼâbal, the verb of mourning for the dead, performed over a man still reigning. Henry sets it beside the Gospels without elaboration and the sentence lands: “Saul seems unconcerned at the token of God's displeasure which he lay under, yet Samuel mourns day and night for him. Jerusalem was carnally secure while Christ wept over it.” Ellicott fills in the human cost — Samuel had known Saul “from the days of his splendid youthful promise,” had loved him, “regarded him as his own adopted child,” and had built on him “all his hopes for the future of the Israel he loved so well.” ⚙ The pattern Henry names — a prophet weeping over the secure and unconcerned — is the same one that reaches its end on the descent of Olivet. This comparison is Henry's own, recorded verbatim in the apparatus, and belongs to the long tradition of reading Israel's mourning prophets as foreshadowing the weeping of Christ.

Luke 19:41-42 · Matthew 23:37

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

⚙ Honesty notes for this unit. Text. The Hebrew is stable here, with one significant exception: at v. 27 the Septuagint reads an active verb (“Saul tore off the lappet”) where the Masoretic Text has the Nifal וַיִּקָּרַע, “and it was torn.” Thenius proposed emending to match the LXX; K&D defends the Masoretic passive, and since the sign in v. 28 depends on the tearing being unintended, we follow K&D — but the reader should know an ancient version disagrees.

The word at v. 32. מַעֲדַנֹּת is genuinely undecided. The Septuagint read “trembling,” the Vulgate gives a double rendering (“sleek and trembling”), the Syriac omits it, and the only other canonical occurrence (Job 38:31) means “bands.” Pulpit and Barnes lean to fetters or obscurity; Benson, Poole, Gill, JFB and K&D to cheerfulness; Cambridge and Ellicott report both. BSB's “cheerfully” is a choice among these, not a translation of a clear word. Our literal leaves the Hebrew untranslated at that point on purpose.

The contradiction at vv. 11, 29 and 35. We have not resolved it and do not think this unit resolves it. The traditional distinction (anthropopathic language in vv. 11 and 35; theoprepic in v. 29) is reported here from K&D and Cambridge, and Cambridge's own verdict that it is “only a partial solution” is reported with it.

Parse anomaly. At v. 26 the pronominal suffix on עִמָּךְ is parsed second person feminine singular in a speech addressed to Saul. We have flagged this rather than silently normalised it; no voice in this apparatus comments on it.

Interlinear order. The word indices in this unit follow the Berean interlinear's display sequence, which is aligned to English word order, not to the Hebrew clause order. Our literal renderings are rebuilt from the Hebrew sequence, so the order of words in the literal does not always match the order of the note indices.

Voices. All commentary is verbatim public-domain material, quoted as contiguous spans and named. Benson's dissent at v. 24 is a genuine minority position and is marked as such. K&D at v. 25 is quoting Cornelius a Lapide, a Roman Catholic commentator, and Ellicott at v. 30 is quoting Gregory at second hand through Wordsworth; both are flagged in their editorial notes. Gill at v. 27 reports rabbinic opinions he does not himself hold.

Thread bases. Three links here (1 Samuel 24:4, Numbers 23:19, Psalm 110:4) were checked by running the Verifier on the pair directly; their computed bases are quoted in full in the badges. The Ahijah link (1 Kings 11:30-31) has no computed lexeme basis and rests on the sign-act pattern plus Gill's and Cambridge's citations — it is tiered structural accordingly. The cross-Testament link to 2 Corinthians 7:10 and Hebrews 12:17 cannot be verbal by definition and is not claimed as such.

Ethics of v. 33. This unit contains a prophet executing a captive king. Ellicott attempts a theodicy of the ban; Poole and Benson both immediately fence the passage against imitation — “these are no precedents for private persons to take the sword of justice into their hands.” ⚙ We record both the defence and the fence, and claim neither as settled.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)