The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

1 Samuel26:21–25

Saul Acknowledges His Sin

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

1 Samuel 26:21–25 — Saul Acknowledges His Sin. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

21

Then Saul replied, “I have sinned. Come back, David my son. I will never harm you again, because today you considered my life precious. I have played the fool and have committed a grave error!”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

šā·’ūl way·yō·mer ḥā·ṭā·ṯî šūḇ ḏā·wiḏ bə·nî- kî lō- ’ā·ra‘ lə·ḵā ‘ō·wḏ ta·ḥaṯ ’ă·šer hay·yō·wm haz·zeh hin·nêh bə·‘ê·ne·ḵā nap̄·šî yā·qə·rāh his·kal·tî har·bêh mə·’ōḏ wā·’eš·geh

Word by word23 · parsed
שָׁא֨וּלšā·’ūlThen SaulH7586
√ Shâʼûwl — Shaul, the name of an Edomite and two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֹּאמֶר֩way·yō·merrepliedH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
חָטָ֜אתִיḥā·ṭā·ṯîI have sinnedH2398
√ châṭâʼ — properly, to missVerbQalPerfectfirst person common singular
châṭâʼ — properly, to miss (Qal perfect 1cs) The root is archery, not courtroom: to miss the mark. Saul's perfect tense states a completed fact about himself, and Gill notes it is “more than he acknowledged before.” But Poole's verdict is that the mouth outran the heart: he “not only confesseth, but aggravateth his fault, because his conscience was fully convinced, though his heart was not changed.” The same verb, on David's lips at 2 Samuel 24:10, will be followed by an altar; here it is followed by nothing.
שׁ֣וּבšūḇCome backH7725
√ shûwb — to turn back (hence, away) transitively or intransitively, literally or figuratively (not necessarily with the idea of return to the starting point)VerbQalImperativemasculine singular
shûwb — to turn back, return A Qal imperative: Return. This root is the spine of the whole unit. Saul commands David to turn back (v. 21); David asks YHWH to turn back (Hiphil, v. 23) to every man his own righteousness; and in the last line it is Saul who turns back, to his place (v. 25). Gill reads the invitation as hollow on its face, since Saul had already given David's wife to another man.
דָוִ֗דḏā·wiḏDavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
בְּנִֽי־bə·nî-my sonH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine singular constructfirst person common singular
bên — a son “My son David.” Saul uses the word he used in the cave (1 Samuel 24), and will use again in v. 25 — the only affection he has left to offer, and the one thing he cannot make binding.
כִּ֠יH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
Causal kîy (H3588) introducing the promise.
לֹֽא־lō-I will neverH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absAdverbNegative particle
אָרַ֤ע’ā·ra‘harmH7489
√ râʻaʻ — properly, to spoil (literally, by breaking to pieces)VerbHifilImperfectfirst person common singular
râʻaʻ — properly, to spoil, to break to pieces (Hifil imperfect 1cs) The Hiphil is causative: I will not cause harm to you. The imperfect leaves it open-ended — never again, at any future time. K&D, quoting the Berleburg Bible, calls this “a good intention, which he never carried out,” and Pulpit observes that Saul's “return” proved “the most evanescent of good purposes.”
לְךָ֙lə·ḵāyou
Prepositionsecond person masculine singular
ע֔וֹד‘ō·wḏagainH5750
√ ʻôwd — properly, iteration or continuanceAdverb
תַּ֠חַתta·ḥaṯbecauseH8478
√ tachath — the bottom (as depressed)Preposition
Preposition tachath (H8478), “underneath,” here the head of the transactional idiom discussed above.
אֲשֶׁ֨ר’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
הַיּ֣וֹםhay·yō·wmtodayH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)ArticleNounmasculine singular
hay·yō·wm with the article — “this day,” the day marker that will recur in vv. 23 and 24 and knit the three speeches together.
הַזֶּ֑הhaz·zeh. . .H2088
√ zeh — the masculine demonstrative pronoun, this or thatArticlePronounmasculine singular
הִנֵּ֥הhin·nêh. . .H2009
√ hinnêh — lo!Interjection
Presentative hinnêh (H2009) — “behold,” marking the turn from promise to self-accusation.
בְּעֵינֶ֖יךָbə·‘ê·ne·ḵāyou consideredH5869
√ ʻayin — an eye (literally or figuratively)Preposition-bNouncdcsecond person masculine singular
נַפְשִׁ֛יnap̄·šîmy lifeH5315
√ nephesh — properly, a breathing creature, iNounfeminine singular constructfirst person common singular
יָקְרָ֥הyā·qə·rāhpreciousH3365
√ yâqar — properly, apparently, to be heavy, iVerbQalPerfectthird person feminine singular
yâqar — to be heavy, costly, precious A rare verb (11 verses). It is the word Scripture uses for the price of a soul that no man can pay (Psalm 49:8), for the weight of God's thoughts (Psalm 139:17), and for thirty pieces of silver in bitter irony (Zechariah 11:13). Benson catches the sting of Saul's phrase: “My soul was precious in thine eyes — which I thought had been odious.”
הִסְכַּ֛לְתִּיhis·kal·tîI have played the foolH5528
√ çâkal — to be sillyVerbHifilPerfectfirst person common singular
çâkal — to be silly (Hifil perfect 1cs) The rarest word in the verse, and the hinge of the unit's canonical memory. Samuel used it to Saul at Gilgal; David will use it of himself after the census; Hanani used it to Asa. Saul's confession is therefore exactly right in vocabulary and exactly empty in effect — Ellicott, crediting the Dean of Canterbury, suspects the self-blame is military rather than moral, for “putting himself again in David’s power through overweening confidence in his own strength.”
הַרְבֵּ֥הhar·bêhand have committed a graveH7235
√ râbâh — to increase (in whatever respect)VerbHifilInfinitive absolute
Infinitive absolute of râbâh (H7235) used adverbially, “much, greatly,” bound with H3966 mᵉʼôd into a doubled intensifier.
מְאֹֽד׃mə·’ōḏ. . .H3966
√ mᵉʼôd — properly, vehemence, iAdverb
וָאֶשְׁגֶּ֖הwā·’eš·geherrorH7686
√ shâgâh — to stray (causatively, mislead), usually (figuratively) to mistake, especially (morally) to transgressConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectfirst person common singular
shâgâh — to stray, to go astray, to err A verb of wandering. Whatever Saul means, he has now catalogued his conduct twice: once as self-made folly, once as drifting. The BSB's single noun “error” cannot carry both.
22

“Here is the king’s spear,” David answered. “Let one of the young men come over and get it.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

hin·nêh ham·me·leḵ ha·ḥă·nīṯ dā·wiḏ way·yō·mer way·ya·‘an ’e·ḥāḏ mê·han·nə·‘ā·rîm wə·ya·‘ă·ḇōr wə·yiq·qā·ḥe·hā

Word by word10 · parsed
הִנֵּ֖הhin·nêhHereH2009
√ hinnêh — lo!Interjection
Presentative hinnêh (H2009) — “behold,” here opening a speech of restitution rather than of confession.
הַמֶּ֑לֶךְham·me·leḵis the king’sH4428
√ melek — a kingArticleNounmasculine singular
הַחֲנִיתha·ḥă·nīṯspearH2595
√ chănîyth — a lance (for thrusting, like pitching a tent)Nounfeminine singular
chănîyth — a lance (for thrusting, like pitching a tent) The lexicon's own image is telling: the spear is what gets driven into the ground. It stood planted at Saul's head all night as the mark of where the king slept, and Gill suggests it functioned as a sceptre, so that David “would not keep” it “lest it should be thought… that he had deprived him of an ensign of his royalty.” Returning the spear is a public abdication of any claim.
דָּוִד֙dā·wiḏDavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֹּ֔אמֶרway·yō·mer. . .H559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
וַיַּ֤עַןway·ya·‘anansweredH6030
√ ʻânâh — properly, to eye or (generally) to heed, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
ʻânâh — properly, to eye or heed, hence to answer The verb of responding to what one has attended to. David's entire reply answers Saul's confession without accepting its invitation.
אֶחָ֥ד’e·ḥāḏLet one ofH259
√ ʼechâd — properly, united, iNumbermasculine singular
מֵֽהַנְּעָרִ֖יםmê·han·nə·‘ā·rîmthe young menH5288
√ naʻar — (concretely) a boy (as active), from the age of infancy to adolescencePreposition-m, ArticleNounmasculine plural
naʻar — a boy, a servant A deliberately low-ranking intermediary; no one important need be risked on either side.
וְיַעֲבֹ֛רwə·ya·‘ă·ḇōrcome overH5674
√ ʻâbar — to cross overConjunctive wawVerbQalConjunctive imperfectthird person masculine singular
ʻâbar — to cross over The crossing is the whole point of the verse. David has already crossed over to a far hill (v. 13); he will not cross back. Benson states the calculation plainly: “He did not think it proper to put himself in Saul's power.”
וְיִקָּחֶֽהָ׃wə·yiq·qā·ḥe·hāand get itH3947
√ lâqach — to take (in the widest variety of applications)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConjunctive imperfectthird person masculine singularthird person feminine singular
lâqach — to take, in the widest variety of applications A servant may take the spear. David will not take the kingdom.
23

May the LORD repay every man for his righteousness and faithfulness. For the LORD delivered you into my hand today, but I would not extend my hand against the LORD’s anointed.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

Yah·weh yā·šîḇ lā·’îš ’eṯ- ṣiḏ·qā·ṯōw wə·’eṯ- ’ĕ·mu·nā·ṯōw ’ă·šer Yah·weh nə·ṯā·nə·ḵā bə·yāḏ hay·yō·wm wə·lō ’ā·ḇî·ṯî liš·lō·aḥ yā·ḏî Yah·weh bim·šî·aḥ

Word by word18 · parsed
וַֽיהוָה֙Yah·wehMay the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
יָשִׁ֣יבyā·šîḇrepayH7725
√ shûwb — to turn back (hence, away) transitively or intransitively, literally or figuratively (not necessarily with the idea of return to the starting point)VerbHifilImperfectthird person masculine singular
shûwb — to turn back, transitively to cause to return (Hifil) The unit's governing root, used here of divine recompense: God will turn back onto a man exactly what that man's own conduct was. K&D render the whole clause as one sentence of recompense; Cambridge points to Psalm 7:8 and Psalm 18:20, where David's own psalmody says the same thing in the first person.
לָאִ֔ישׁlā·’îševery manH376
√ ʼîysh — a man as an individual or a male personPreposition-l, ArticleNounmasculine singular
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
צִדְקָת֖וֹṣiḏ·qā·ṯōwfor his righteousnessH6666
√ tsᵉdâqâh — rightness (abstractly), subjectively (rectitude), objectively (justice), morally (virtue) or figuratively (prosperity)Nounfeminine singular constructthird person masculine singular
tsᵉdâqâh — rightness, rectitude, justice Geneva enters the necessary caveat before this verse can be misused: David “protests his innocency toward Saul, not defending his justice in the sight of God, in whose presence none is righteous.” The righteousness claimed is relative and forensic between two men, not absolute before God.
וְאֶת־wə·’eṯ-andH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
אֱמֻנָת֑וֹ’ĕ·mu·nā·ṯōwfaithfulnessH530
√ ʼĕmûwnâh — literally firmnessNounfeminine singular constructthird person masculine singular
ʼĕmûwnâh — literally firmness Steadiness, reliability, the quality of a thing that holds. Paired with tsᵉdâqâh it names the two halves of covenant conduct: doing right, and continuing to. Saul has just promised; David has already performed.
אֲשֶׁר֩’ă·šerForH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
יְהוָ֤ה׀Yah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
נְתָנְךָ֨nə·ṯā·nə·ḵādelivered youH5414
√ nâthan — to give, used with greatest latitude of application (put, make, etcVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singularsecond person masculine singular
nâthan — to give, with the greatest latitude A Qal perfect with 2ms suffix: He gave thee. Abishai had said the same thing in v. 8 to justify a spear-thrust; David says it to justify restraint. The identical theological premise yields opposite conclusions, and the difference lies entirely in what each man thinks a gift from God licenses.
בְּיָ֔דbə·yāḏinto [my] handH3027
√ yâd — a hand (the open one (indicating power, means, direction, etcPreposition-bNounfeminine singular
yâd — a hand, the open one, indicating power and means Unsuffixed here. The word appears twice in this verse, once as the hand God filled and once as the hand David would not lift — the same organ, the same night.
הַיּוֹם֙hay·yō·wmtodayH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)ArticleNounmasculine singular
hay·yō·wm, “today” — the third occurrence of the day-marker across vv. 21, 23, 24, fixing all three speeches to one night's evidence.
וְלֹ֣אwə·lōbutH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absConjunctive wawAdverbNegative particle
אָבִ֔יתִי’ā·ḇî·ṯîI would notH14
√ ʼâbâh — to breathe after, iVerbQalPerfectfirst person common singular
ʼâbâh — to breathe after, hence to be willing, to consent A verb of inclination, here negated in the perfect: I was not willing. The distinction matters against Abishai, who in v. 8 wanted the blow and asked only for permission. David is not claiming he resisted a temptation; he is claiming the appetite was never there. BSB's “I would not” reads as a decision withheld, where the Hebrew denies the desire behind it.
לִשְׁלֹ֥חַliš·lō·aḥextendH7971
√ shâlach — to send away, for, or out (in a great variety of applications)Preposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
shâlach — to send away, out, forth The infinitive construct with l-, “to stretch out.” The idiom “send forth the hand” is the standard Hebrew for laying violent hands on someone.
יָדִ֖יyā·ḏîmy handH3027
√ yâd — a hand (the open one (indicating power, means, direction, etcNounfeminine singular constructfirst person common singular
יְהוָֽה׃Yah·wehagainst the LORD’sH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
בִּמְשִׁ֥יחַbim·šî·aḥanointedH4899
√ mâshîyach — anointedPreposition-bAdjectivemasculine singular construct
mâshîyach — anointed The pivot of the entire David-Saul narrative and the reason this book will not let David take the throne by his own arm. The word is a passive form — one who has been anointed — so the status is something done to Saul by God through Samuel, not something Saul maintains by conduct; that is exactly why his manifest unfitness does not dissolve it. Both men in this scene had been anointed by the same prophet, and only one of them still acts as though the anointing means anything. The Greek Old Testament renders this noun Christos, and David's scruple here is the same one he will enforce with a death sentence over the Amalekite who claims to have finished Saul off (2 Samuel 1:14-16).
24

As surely as I valued your life today, so may the LORD value my life and rescue me from all trouble.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·hin·nêh ka·’ă·šer bə·‘ê·nāy gā·ḏə·lāh nap̄·šə·ḵā hay·yō·wm haz·zeh kên Yah·weh bə·‘ê·nê tiḡ·dal nap̄·šî wə·yaṣ·ṣi·lê·nî mik·kāl ṣā·rāh

Word by word15 · parsed
וְהִנֵּ֗הwə·hin·nêhAs surely asH2009
√ hinnêh — lo!Conjunctive wawInterjection
wə·hin·nêh — “and behold,” opening the formal comparison that structures the verse (ka’ăsher… kên, “as… so”).
כַּאֲשֶׁ֨רka·’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPreposition-kPronounrelative
בְּעֵינָ֑יbə·‘ê·nāyI valuedH5869
√ ʻayin — an eye (literally or figuratively)Preposition-bNouncdcfirst person common singular
ʻayin — an eye (literally or figuratively) “In my eyes.” The verse turns on two courts of appraisal: Saul's eyes (v. 21), David's eyes, and finally YHWH's eyes. Gill catches the omission precisely — David “does not say in the eyes of Saul, as it should have been by way of retaliation.”
גָּדְלָ֧הgā·ḏə·lāh. . .H1431
√ gâdal — to be (causatively make) large (in various senses, as in body, mind, estate or honor, also in pride)VerbQalPerfectthird person feminine singular
gâdal — to be, or causatively make, large Qal perfect 3fs, agreeing with the feminine nephesh. David has just weighed Saul's life and found it heavy. The claim is an act of appraisal already performed, not a promise.
נַפְשְׁךָ֛nap̄·šə·ḵāyour lifeH5315
√ nephesh — properly, a breathing creature, iNounfeminine singular constructsecond person masculine singular
nephesh — properly, a breathing creature Not an immaterial soul but the breathing self — the thing that can be hunted, spared, or stopped. It is the standard object of the psalms' verbs of pursuit (“they seek my nephesh”), and David has spent this chapter as its object. Its doubling here, one nephesh in each half of the comparison, turns the verse into a set of scales with a man in each pan and God holding the beam.
הַיּ֥וֹםhay·yō·wmtodayH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)ArticleNounmasculine singular
hay·yō·wm haz·zeh, “this day” — the last of the day-markers, closing David's speech where Saul's began.
הַזֶּ֖הhaz·zeh. . .H2088
√ zeh — the masculine demonstrative pronoun, this or thatArticlePronounmasculine singular
כֵּ֣ןkênsoH3651
√ kên — properly, set uprightAdverb
יְהוָ֔הYah·wehmay the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
בְּעֵינֵ֣יbə·‘ê·nêvalueH5869
√ ʻayin — an eye (literally or figuratively)Preposition-bNouncdc
ʻayin — an eye “In the eyes of YHWH,” construct and unsuffixed — the one court David actually trusts. K&D insist this is “not any ‘sounding of his own praises’ (Thenius)” but “the testimony of a good conscience before God in the presence of an enemy.”
תִּגְדַּ֤לtiḡ·dal. . .H1431
√ gâdal — to be (causatively make) large (in various senses, as in body, mind, estate or honor, also in pride)VerbQalImperfectthird person feminine singular
gâdal — to be great (Qal imperfect 3fs) The imperfect answering the perfect: what David has done for Saul, may God do for David. This is measure-for-measure piety, and Poole reduces it to one sentence: “I desire that God would deal no otherwise with me than I have dealt with thee.”
נַפְשִׁי֙nap̄·šîmy lifeH5315
√ nephesh — properly, a breathing creature, iNounfeminine singular constructfirst person common singular
וְיַצִּלֵ֖נִיwə·yaṣ·ṣi·lê·nîand rescue meH5337
√ nâtsal — to snatch away, whether in a good or a bad senseConjunctive wawVerbHifilConjunctive imperfect Jussivethird person masculine singularfirst person common singular
nâtsal — to snatch away, whether in a good or a bad sense Hiphil jussive with 1cs suffix. Cambridge sends the reader to Psalm 34:17 and Psalm 54:7 — the second of which is headed as a Ziphite psalm, tying David's prayer here to the very betrayal that set this night in motion.
מִכָּל־mik·kālfrom allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholePreposition-mNounmasculine singular construct
צָרָֽה׃פṣā·rāhtroubleH6869
√ tsârâh — tightness (iNounfeminine singular
tsârâh — tightness, hence distress A narrow place. The metaphor of salvation as being brought out into a wide place depends on it.
25

Saul said to him, “May you be blessed, David my son. You will accomplish great things and will surely prevail.” So David went on his way, and Saul returned home.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

šā·’ūl way·yō·mer ’el- dā·wiḏ ’at·tāh bā·rūḵ ḏā·wiḏ bə·nî gam ṯa·‘ă·śeh ‘ā·śōh wə·ḡam yā·ḵōl tū·ḵāl dā·wiḏ way·yê·leḵ lə·ḏar·kōw wə·šā·’ūl šāḇ lim·qō·w·mōw

Word by word20 · parsed
שָׁא֜וּלšā·’ūlSaulH7586
√ Shâʼûwl — Shaul, the name of an Edomite and two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֹּ֨אמֶרway·yō·mersaidH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
אֶל־’el-toH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPreposition
דָּוִ֗דdā·wiḏhimH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
אַתָּה֙’at·tāh[May] youH859
√ ʼattâh — thou and thee, or (plural) ye and youPronounsecond person masculine singular
בָּר֤וּךְbā·rūḵ[be] blessedH1288
√ bârak — to kneelVerbQalQalPassParticiplemasculine singular
bârak — to kneel, hence to bless A blessing pronounced by the man who has spent three chapters trying to kill its recipient. Benson takes it at something near face value: Saul “could not forbear blessing him, foretelling his success, applauding him, and condemning himself, even in the hearing of his own soldiers.” K&D read it as forced concession, “an acknowledgment… that God was blessing all his undertakings.” The Hebrew form settles nothing; it states the fact and leaves the heart unexamined.
דָוִ֔דḏā·wiḏDavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
בְּנִ֣יbə·nîmy sonH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine singular constructfirst person common singular
bên — a son “My son David,” for the last time. They never spoke again.
גַּ֚םgam. . .H1571
√ gam — properly, assemblageConjunction
תַעֲשֶׂ֔הṯa·‘ă·śeh. . .H6213
√ ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest applicationVerbQalImperfectsecond person masculine singular
ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense The finite imperfect completing the emphatic pair. The verb is bare “do”; every English rendering that supplies an object is supplying it.
עָשֹׂ֣ה‘ā·śōhYou will accomplish great thingsH6213
√ ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest applicationVerbQalInfinitive absolute
ʻâsâh — to do (Infinitive absolute) The infinitive absolute preceding its finite verb is Hebrew's strongest affirmation. Ellicott, quoting Bishop Wordsworth, hears in it something prophetic — Saul “again ‘among the prophets.’”
וְגַ֖םwə·ḡamandH1571
√ gam — properly, assemblageConjunction
יָכֹ֣לyā·ḵōlwill surely prevailH3201
√ yâkôl — to be able, literally (can, could) or morally (may, might)VerbQalInfinitive absolute
yâkôl — to be able, literally or morally Infinitive absolute of ability. K&D take the sense as “to vanquish, i.e., to carry out what one undertakes.” The tragedy is exact: Saul names the one thing he himself could never do, and names it of the man he cannot stop.
תּוּכָ֑לtū·ḵāl. . .H3201
√ yâkôl — to be able, literally (can, could) or morally (may, might)VerbQalImperfectsecond person masculine singular
דָּוִד֙dā·wiḏSo DavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֵּ֤לֶךְway·yê·leḵwentH1980
√ hâlak — to walk (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
hâlak — to walk, in a great variety of applications The verb of ongoing journey. David walks; he does not return.
לְדַרְכּ֔וֹlə·ḏar·kōwon his wayH1870
√ derek — a road (as trodden)Preposition-lNouncommon singular constructthird person masculine singular
derek — a road (as trodden) Not a destination but a way already worn by walking. David's next recorded act is to cross into Philistine territory (1 Samuel 27:1), which K&D note is the very thing David had just called his greatest calamity in v. 19.
וְשָׁא֖וּלwə·šā·’ūland SaulH7586
√ Shâʼûwl — Shaul, the name of an Edomite and two IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
שָׁ֥בšāḇreturnedH7725
√ shûwb — to turn back (hence, away) transitively or intransitively, literally or figuratively (not necessarily with the idea of return to the starting point)VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
shûwb — to turn back The last use of the root that governs the unit, and the one that closes it. Saul's whole reign is summarized by which direction he faces at the end of a conversation.
לִמְקוֹמֽוֹ׃פlim·qō·w·mōwhomeH4725
√ mâqôwm — properly, a standing, iPreposition-lNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
mâqôwm — properly, a standing place Cambridge compares 1 Samuel 2:20. K&D point instead to Numbers 24:25, where Balaam, having blessed Israel against his will, likewise “returned to his place” — the closest verbal parallel to this ending anywhere in the Torah.

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. The right words, twice over — 26:21

Saul's confession is lexically flawless. He says חָטָ֜אתִי (châṭâʼ, H2398, “I have missed”), he says הִסְכַּ֛לְתִּי (çâkal, H5528, Hiphil: “I have made myself a fool”), and he says וָאֶשְׁגֶּ֖ה הַרְבֵּ֥ה מְאֹֽד (“and I have strayed exceedingly”). Gill observes that this is “more than he acknowledged before.” Benson goes further and believes it: “Nothing can be more full and ingenuous than this confession. God surely now touched his heart.” The commentators are genuinely divided here, and it is worth saying so plainly rather than harmonizing them. Poole grants the words and denies the heart — the fault is confessed and even aggravated “because his conscience was fully convinced, though his heart was not changed.” Henry is blunter: “he showed no evidence of true repentance towards God.” Pulpit hears not sorrow but irritation — “a sense of vexation seems uppermost… because his own military arrangements had been so unsoldierlike” — and Ellicott, following the Dean of Canterbury, thinks Saul is blaming himself for having walked into David's power a second time. K&D hand the verdict to the Berleburg Bible: Saul “ought rather to have taken refuge with God… yea, he should have entreated David himself to pray for him.” ⚙ What the Hebrew itself contributes to this dispute is the rarity of çâkal: eight verses in the entire canon, one of which is Samuel's own sentence over Saul at Gilgal. Saul has learned the prophet's vocabulary. Nothing in the grammar tells us whether he has learned anything else.

ii. The spear sent back across the ravine — 26:22

David's answer is an act, not an argument. Pulpit argues from the consonantal text that the line should be read as a vocative — “Behold the spear, O king,” not “the king's spear,” the received division being “an unnecessary correction of the Kri.” Either way the object goes home. Gill explains why it must: the spear was possibly Saul's sceptre, and David “would not keep” it “lest it should be thought or said that he had deprived him of an ensign of his royalty.” The man who could have kept the crown's emblem hands it back and asks a boy to walk it over. And yet the same verse measures David's trust exactly. Cambridge: “he durst not now venture to put himself in Saul's power, as he appears to have done upon the former occasion.” Benson agrees, and Gill adds the further calculation that David would not send one of his own men either, “lest they should be seized as traitors.” ⚙ The verb וְיַעֲבֹ֛ר (ʻâbar, H5674, “cross over”) keeps the ravine in the sentence. Reconciliation is offered in words from one side and declined in geography from the other.

iii. Two scales, and the one court that matters — 26:23–26:24

David's prayer is built on a root-pun the English cannot carry: Saul commanded שׁ֣וּב (“return”), and David answers יָשִׁ֣יבmay YHWH cause to return to every man his own צִדְקָת֖וֹ and אֱמֻנָת֑וֹ. Cambridge argues the verb should be read as future indicative — “Better, shall render” — and that David “is not sounding his own praises, but… declaring his confidence that God will eventually recompense him,” comparing Psalm 7:8 and Psalm 18:20. Pulpit reads the prayer as double-edged: God will “requite David for his upright conduct towards Saul, and by implication punish Saul himself.” Geneva inserts the indispensable caution, that David “protests his innocency toward Saul, not defending his justice in the sight of God, in whose presence none is righteous.” Gill notices the textual detail that BSB smooths away: the Hebrew is “into a hand,” which he takes of Abishai, “who had it in his power to slay him.” Then v. 24 changes the scale-word. Saul had said David held his life yâqar, costly; David replies with gâdal, great — and Cambridge points out the switch explicitly, “a different Heb. word is used here: lit. ‘was great.’” K&D defend the whole sentence against Thenius's charge of self-praise, calling it “the testimony of a good conscience before God in the presence of an enemy, who is indeed obliged to confess his wrong-doing, but who no longer feels or acknowledges his need of forgiveness.” Gill sees the pointed omission: David “does not say in the eyes of Saul, as it should have been by way of retaliation… but he had no dependence on Saul.” Poole condenses the ethic to a line: “I desire that God would deal no otherwise with me than I have dealt with thee.”

iv. A blessing, a road, and a standing place — 26:25

Saul's last recorded word to David is בָּר֤וּךְ, a passive participle — not a wish but a verdict — followed by two infinitive-absolute constructions that Pulpit renders “Thou shalt both do mightily, and thou shalt surely prevail.” Benson takes the moment at face value: Saul “could not forbear blessing him… even in the hearing of his own soldiers.” Ellicott, quoting Bishop Wordsworth, calls Saul here “again ‘among the prophets.’” K&D deny any goodwill in it and call it “an acknowledgment, forced upon him by this fresh experience of David's magnanimity, that God was blessing all his undertakings.” Pulpit supports that reading by comparison: the words are “very general as compared with those in 1 Samuel 24:20, 21,” where Saul had named the kingdom outright and commended his family — evidence, on Keil's judgment, “that Saul's character had deteriorated in the interval.” Then the narrator stops commenting and simply moves two bodies in opposite directions: David walked to his road, Saul turned back to his place. JFB: David “placed no confidence in his professions or promises, but wisely kept at a distance and awaited the course of Providence.” Poole says the same of Saul's “unstable and deceitful heart.” Ellicott writes the epitaph for the scene: “Here the two whom Samuel had anointed as kings… parted for ever.” K&D note the exact wording — nothing is said of Saul returning to his house, as in 1 Samuel 24:22 — and send the reader to Numbers 24:25, where Balaam, after blessing against his will, also “returned to his place.”

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested against the text and the fathers. The unit is an argument about who is allowed to settle accounts. Saul settles his own: he audits himself in the right words, prices David's mercy with yâqar, and issues a pardon and a blessing on his own authority — and every one of those acts is legally void, because none of them is addressed to God. He says “I have sinned” to the man he wronged and not one syllable to the God he sinned against; K&D's Berleburg source puts its finger exactly there. David, holding the spear and the advantage, refuses to settle anything. He hands back the sceptre, declines the invitation, and refers the entire case — his righteousness, Saul's guilt, his own future — to a court he cannot convene: may YHWH cause to return to each man his own. The two men part along that line. Saul goes back to his standing place, where nothing will change; David walks onto a road, because a man who has left judgment with God can afford to keep moving. ⚙ And the restraint has a name in the text, not merely a motive: David will not stretch out his hand against מְשִׁ֥יחַ יְהוָה. He spares Saul not because Saul deserves it — Saul manifestly does not — but because the anointing is God's property. That is a harder ethic than mercy and a more durable one, and it is the ethic that will later let David weep over the corpse of the man who hunted him.

Saul confessed to the man he had wronged and never once to the God he had sinned against; that is the whole distance between remorse and repentance. (⚙ This line is the tool's own summary, not a verse of Scripture.)

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

“Thou hast done foolishly” — the word a prophet used first verbal / quotation — confirmed

The rare Hiphil הִסְכַּ֛לְתִּי (çâkal, H5528) that Saul turns on himself is the same verb Samuel pronounced over him at Gilgal, and the same verb Hanani used to sentence Asa, and the verb Laban flung at Jacob. The Verifier records it as the shared lexeme with all three passages. ⚙ The bitterness is that Saul's self-diagnosis is verbally identical to the prophetic verdict he received years earlier and never acted on: he can now say the sentence himself, which changes nothing. Pulpit reads even this admission as vexation rather than penitence — “a sense of vexation seems uppermost… because his own military arrangements had been so unsoldierlike.”

1 Samuel 13:13 · 2 Chronicles 16:9 · Genesis 31:28 · Isaiah 44:25

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H5528 çâkal, present in only 8 verses in the whole canon — a genuinely rare word, which is what licenses a verbal tier here. 1 Samuel 13:13 additionally shares H7586 Shâʼûwl (in 335 vv), which carries no weight on its own. No quotation is claimed; the link is lexical identity of a rare root.

David will one day say Saul's sentence about himself verbal / quotation — confirmed

After the census, David says to God what Saul here says to David: I have sinned greatly… I have done very foolishly. The Verifier confirms that 2 Samuel 24:10 and its parallel in 1 Chronicles 21:8 share three lexemes with this verse — châṭâʼ, çâkal and mᵉʼôd — the same three Saul strings together. ⚙ The difference is not in the vocabulary, which is nearly identical, but in the addressee and the sequel: David speaks to YHWH and buys a threshing floor to build an altar; Saul speaks to David and goes home. Gill, weighing this very confession, suspects Saul was “like Pharaoh” in Exodus 9:27 — guilty conscience forcing the words out — and Poole allows the confession while denying the change of heart.

2 Samuel 24:10 · 1 Chronicles 21:8 · Exodus 9:27

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H5528 çâkal (in 8 vv — rare), H2398 châṭâʼ (in 220 vv) and H3966 mᵉʼôd (in 279 vv) across 2 Samuel 24:10 and 1 Chronicles 21:8. The rare çâkal carries the verbal tier; the other two are common and corroborative only. Exodus 9:27 is added on Gill's authority as a thematic comparison, not on a Verifier-computed lexeme.

Costly in whose eyes — the arithmetic of yâqar verbal / quotation — confirmed

יָקְרָ֥ה (yâqar, H3365) stands in only eleven verses, and the Verifier links this one to nearly all of them. Earlier in the same book, the identical root reports that David's name became costly in Israel's eyes (1 Samuel 18:30) — the beginning of the jealousy that produced this manhunt; here it is David's valuation of Saul's life that Saul must acknowledge. ⚙ The same root ends the story of an anointed king betrayed for a price in Zechariah 11:13, “a goodly price that I was prised at of them,” and denies in Psalm 49:8 that any man can pay the ransom of a soul. Cambridge, reading v. 24, notes that David does not reuse Saul's word but answers with gâdal instead — so the two men do not even weigh on the same scale.

1 Samuel 18:30 · Psalm 49:8 · Zechariah 11:13 · Psalm 139:17 · Isaiah 43:4

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H3365 yâqar (in 11 vv — rare) across all five references; 1 Samuel 18:30 additionally shares H3966 mᵉʼôd (in 279 vv) and H7586 Shâʼûwl (in 335 vv). The rarity of yâqar is the basis. No quotation and no literary dependence is claimed between these passages — only shared possession of an uncommon root.

Balaam's exit line — “and returned to his place” structural / thematic — confirmed

K&D, commenting on this unit, send the reader to Numbers 24:25 for the closing formula: after blessing Israel against his own intention and his employer's wishes, Balaam “rose up, and went and returned to his place.” Saul, having blessed David against his own intention, does exactly the same, and K&D stress that unlike 1 Samuel 24:22 the text pointedly does not say he returned to his house. ⚙ The pattern is a narrative one: a man who has just been made to speak God's verdict on someone else's future, and who is then moved offstage without comment. Pulpit reaches the same judgment by a different route, noting how much thinner Saul's blessing is than the one at 1 Samuel 24:20–21.

Numbers 24:25 · 1 Samuel 24:22

basis: The link is a shared closing formula and narrative shape, recorded by K&D in the sourced commentary ("cf. Numbers 24:25"), not a Verifier-computed lexeme — Numbers 24:25 does not appear in the thread candidates, so no shared-Strong's basis is claimed for it. Tiered structural on the strength of the commentator's citation plus the parallel scene-shape.

Leaving the account with God rather than the hand structural / thematic — confirmed

David's refusal is not passivity: he states a principle — may YHWH cause to return to the man his righteousness — and then acts on it by returning the spear. ⚙ The New Testament argues the same ethic in Greek: Paul forbids self-avenging on the ground that repayment belongs to God, and Peter describes Christ as one who, being reviled, “kept entrusting himself to Him who judges justly.” Gill reads David's line as “a prayer of faith; for David doubted not that, though Saul might fail, yet God could not.”

Romans 12:19 · 1 Peter 2:23

basis: Cross-Testament (Hebrew ↔ Greek), so no shared Strong's number is possible and no verbal tier is claimed. The basis is a shared ethical structure — vengeance renounced and recompense deferred to God — which is a motif link, not a quotation. The New Testament passages do not cite this verse.

The doublet question: 1 Samuel 24 and 1 Samuel 26 flagged — verify source

Cambridge simply notes at v. 21, “Compare and contrast 1 Samuel 24:16 ff.” Maclaren addresses the harder issue head on: “It is fashionable at present to regard this incident and the other instance of David's sparing Saul, when in his power, as two versions of one event,” and he argues against it — the hunted outlaw could well have sheltered twice in the same country, and “the whole cast of the two incidents is so different that it is impossible to see how the one could have been evolved from the other.” ⚙ This entry is flagged deliberately. Whether 1 Samuel 24 and 26 are two events or two tellings is a live source-critical dispute that the Hebrew text itself does not adjudicate, and the answer changes how every comparison between the chapters should be read. Pulpit and K&D assume two events and build an argument about Saul's moral deterioration between them; that argument stands or falls with the assumption.

1 Samuel 24:16 · 1 Samuel 24:20 · 1 Samuel 24:22

basis: Contested provenance. The link between the chapters is asserted by the sourced commentators (Cambridge's "compare and contrast", Maclaren's explicit defence of two distinct events, Pulpit's and K&D's comparison of Saul's two speeches), but the underlying question — one event or two — is disputed and unresolved in the sources themselves. 1 Samuel 24 is not in the Verifier candidate list, so no computed shared-lexeme basis supports it. Verify before relying on any comparative argument built on it.

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

The hand that would not touch the anointed ancient/widely-held

The reason David gives is a single word: מְשִׁ֥יחַ יְהוָה (mâshîyach, H4899), the LORD's anointed — the noun the Greek Old Testament renders Christos. That identification is not a devotional stretch; it is the apostolic church's own reading, which prays Psalm 2's “against the LORD and against His Anointed” and applies it directly to “Thy holy servant Jesus, whom Thou hast anointed” in Acts 4. ⚙ David's restraint therefore rests on a category the New Testament inherits whole: the anointed one belongs to God, and a hand raised against him is raised past him. The dark side of the type is that when hands finally were laid on the true Anointed, Peter preaches that this too happened by God's determined counsel — so the category David honoured was not, in the end, a shield. What David refused to do to a failed anointed king, Israel's rulers did to the faithful one.

Psalm 2:2 · Acts 4:26 · Acts 2:23

“The LORD render to every man his righteousness” ancient/widely-held

David refuses to be his own judge and lodges the case with God — and the New Testament makes that deferral a doctrine with a date attached: the Son of Man will come and “render to every man according to his works,” and the risen Christ says “My reward is with Me, to render to each one according to what he has done.” ⚙ The verb David uses is shûwb in the Hiphil, “cause to return”; the Greek apodidōmi carries the same commercial logic of paying back. Henry draws the christological conclusion for the whole unit rather than for the clause: “No reconciliation among men is firm, which is not founded in an cemented by peace with God through Jesus Christ” — which is exactly why Saul's reconciliation held for one night. Geneva's caution belongs here too: the righteousness David claims is his innocence toward Saul, “not defending his justice in the sight of God, in whose presence none is righteous.”

Matthew 16:27 · Romans 2:6 · Revelation 22:12

A true word out of a false mouth novel

Saul pronounces בָּר֤וּךְ אַתָּה and predicts, in two emphatic infinitive-absolute constructions, that David will both act and prevail — and it is true, and he has no intention of helping it come true. Ellicott, quoting Bishop Wordsworth, calls him here “again ‘among the prophets.’” K&D call it acknowledgment “forced upon him.” ⚙ Scripture has a recognizable category for this: the unwilling true prophecy, Balaam blessing the people he was hired to curse (to which K&D compare this verse's ending), and Caiaphas declaring that one man should die for the people — which John says “he did not say of himself.” The pattern points forward: the verdict on the true Anointed's kingship is spoken most publicly by his enemies, in a title nailed above his head by the governor who condemned him. This last step is the tool's own figural reading and is offered as such, not as a claim any of the sourced commentators make about this verse.

Numbers 24:25 · John 11:49 · John 19:19

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Alexander Maclaren, Expositions of Holy Scripture (c. 1905)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

Text and translation. The base English is the Berean Standard Bible (CC0); the interlinear, Strong's numbers and morphological parsings are the Berean data. Two places in this unit where the English makes a choice the Hebrew leaves open are recorded above: at v. 22 the received division gives “the king's spear,” while Pulpit argues from the consonantal text for the vocative “Behold the spear, O king,” calling the alternative “an unnecessary correction of the Kri”; and at v. 23 the Hebrew בְּיָ֔ד is unsuffixed — literally “into a hand” — where BSB supplies “my,” a point Gill raises explicitly, citing Pagninus and Montanus, and takes of Abishai's hand rather than David's.

Sources. All ✦ material is verbatim public-domain commentary quoted from the brief: Ellicott, Maclaren, Benson, Henry, Barnes, JFB, Poole, Gill, Geneva, Cambridge, Pulpit and Keil & Delitzsch. Three secondhand attributions should be tracked rather than absorbed: K&D's most pointed paragraph on v. 21 is a quotation from the Berleburg Bible, not their own prose; Ellicott's remark on v. 25 is a quotation from Bishop Wordsworth, including the Julian legend, which is homiletic ornament with no bearing on the Hebrew; and Henry's note is his Concise commentary on the whole span 26:21–25, so it appears against several verses in the source and should not be read as a comment on any single one.

What is uncertain. (1) The commentators genuinely disagree about Saul's sincerity, and the text does not settle it: Benson holds that “God surely now touched his heart,” while Poole, Henry, Pulpit and K&D all read the confession as conviction without change. We have recorded the disagreement rather than resolving it. (2) Whether 1 Samuel 24 and 1 Samuel 26 report two events or two versions of one is disputed; Maclaren argues for two, and every comparative argument in this unit — including Keil's claim, reported by Pulpit, that Saul's character had deteriorated in the interval — depends on that. The relevant thread is tiered “flagged — verify source” for this reason. (3) Barnes's note in the brief and JFB's both belong to 26:19–20, the verses immediately preceding this unit, and are reproduced by the source against these verses; neither has been quoted here as commentary on 26:21–25 except JFB's own note at v. 25. (4) No thread in this unit claims a New Testament quotation of these verses, because there is none; the two cross-Testament entries are tiered structural and typological accordingly, and the christological readings are marked ancient/widely-held or novel as honestly as we can judge.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)