The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The LORD Calls Samuel
1 Samuel 3:1–14 — The LORD Calls Samuel. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
1And the boy Samuel ministered to the LORD before Eli. Now in those days the word of the LORD was rare, and visions were scarce.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·han·na·‘ar šə·mū·’êl mə·šā·rêṯ ’eṯ- Yah·weh lip̄·nê ‘ê·lî hā·hêm bay·yā·mîm ū·ḏə·ḇar- Yah·weh hā·yāh yā·qār ḥā·zō·wn ’ên nip̄·rāṣ
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-the-boy Samuel was-ministering [to] YHWH before-the-face-of Eli. And-the-word-of-YHWH was precious in-the-days those; there-was-no vision breaking-forth.
Where the English smooths the original
A demoralised priesthood, an alienated people, a silent God,-these are the outstanding features of the period when this fair life of continuous worship unfolded itself. This flower grew in a desert.
the word of the Lord had become dear, i.e., rare, in Israel, and "Prophecy was not spread." נפרץ, from פּרץ, to spread out strongly, to break through copiouslyK&D is translating from German; "dear" here carries the Hebrew yâqâr in its price sense, and he immediately glosses it "i.e., rare."
There are in Hebrew two words for vision : the one used here, hazon , refers to such sights as are revealed to the tranced eye of the seer when in a state of ecstasy
2And at that time Eli, whose eyesight had grown so dim that he could not see, was lying in his room.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·hî bay·yō·wm ha·hū wə·‘ê·lî wə·ʿē·nō hê·ḥêl·lū ḵê·hō·wṯ yū·ḵal lō lir·’ō·wṯ šō·ḵêḇ bim·qō·mō
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-it-came-to-pass in-the-day the-that, and-Eli lying in-his-place, and-his-eyes had-begun dim: not he-was-able to-see.
Where the English smooths the original
This rendering is possible, but the Heb. literally means on that day , the memorable day which left such a deep mark upon Samuel’s life
Some, as Kimchi and others, understand this not of the eyes of his body, but of his mind; and that the Holy Spirit, as a spirit of prophecy, was departing from him, because of his connivance at the sins of his sonsGill is reporting a figurative reading of the dim eyes, not asserting it; the Hebrew supports only physical failing sight.
This is added as an evidence of his old age, partly to show God’s contempt of him, notwithstanding his venerable age, and his preferring the child Samuel before him in this vision
3Before the lamp of God had gone out, Samuel was lying down in the temple of the LORD, where the ark of God was located.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ṭe·rem wə·nêr ’ĕ·lō·hîm yiḵ·beh ū·šə·mū·’êl šō·ḵêḇ bə·hê·ḵal Yah·weh ’ă·šer- ’ă·rō·wn ’ĕ·lō·hîm šām
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-the-lamp-of God not-yet had-gone-out, and-Samuel lying in-the-palace-of YHWH, where there [was] the-ark-of God.
Where the English smooths the original
In the deep silence of that early morning, before the sun had risen, when the sacred light was still burning, came through the mouth of the innocent child the doom of the house of Ithamar.Ellicott is quoting Dean Stanley's Lectures on the Jewish Church, not writing in his own voice here.
some by this lamp understand the lamp of prophecy, that before that was quite extinct in Eli, only began to depart, as his eyes are said to begin to wax dim, the spirit of prophecy came to Samuel; so that, as the Jews express it, before one sun was set another arose; thus before the sun of Moses set, the sun of Joshua arose; and before the sun of Eli set, the sun of Samuel aroseGill offers this as a received Jewish figure on the lamp, alongside the literal reading he gives first.
but the whole tabernacle, the tent with its court, as the palace of the God-king
4Then the LORD called to Samuel, and he answered, “Here I am.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
Yah·weh ’el- way·yiq·rā šə·mū·’êl way·yō·mer hin·nê·nî
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-called YHWH unto-Samuel, and-he-said: Behold-me!
Where the English smooths the original
the regular formula for expressing attention to a call and readiness to obey
By a voice which came forth from the most holy place, from between the cherubim, the seat of the divine MajestyThe location of the voice is Gill's inference from v. 3 and Exodus 25:22, not a statement of this verse.
5He ran to Eli and said, “Here I am, for you have called me.” “I did not call,” Eli replied. “Go back and lie down.” So he went and lay down.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·yā·rāṣ ’el- ‘ê·lî way·yō·mer hin·nî kî- qā·rā·ṯā lî lō- qā·rā·ṯî way·yō·mer šūḇ šə·ḵāḇ way·yê·leḵ way·yiš·kāḇ
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-he-ran unto-Eli and-said: Behold-me, for thou-calledst to-me. And-he-said: I-called-not; return, lie-down. And-he-went and-lay-down.
Where the English smooths the original
He ran; showing his great faithfulness and diligence in the service, either of the Lord, or of his master Eli.
Note Samuel’s alacrity to serve the aged priest, his spiritual father.
It is evident that his sleeping chamber was close to that of the aged high priest and that he was accustomed to be called during the night.
6Once again the LORD called, “Samuel!” So Samuel got up, went to Eli, and said, “Here I am, for you have called me.” “My son, I did not call,” Eli replied. “Go back and lie down.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·yō·sep̄ ‘ō·wḏ Yah·weh qə·rō šə·mū·’êl šə·mū·’êl way·yā·qām way·yê·leḵ ’el- ‘ê·lî way·yō·mer hin·nî kî qā·rā·ṯā lî ḇə·nî lō- qā·rā·ṯî way·yō·mer šūḇ šə·ḵāḇ
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-added YHWH to-call again: Samuel! And-arose Samuel and-went unto-Eli and-said: Behold-me, for thou-calledst to-me. And-he-said: I-called-not, my-son; return, lie-down.
Where the English smooths the original
by this appellation, my son, he expresses his affection to him, and signifies he took it kindly that he should show such readiness to do anything for him
The call which Divine grace designs shall be made effectual; will be repeated till it is so, till we come to the call.Henry's note is written over 3:1 to 3:10 as a block, so it comments on the repeated call rather than on this verse alone.
7Now Samuel did not yet know the LORD, because the word of the LORD had not yet been revealed to him.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·šə·mū·’êl ṭe·rem yā·ḏa‘ ’eṯ- Yah·weh də·ḇar- Yah·weh wə·ṭe·rem yig·gā·leh ’ê·lāw
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-Samuel not-yet knew [the-self-of] YHWH, and-not-yet was-uncovered unto-him the-word-of-YHWH.
Where the English smooths the original
8Once again, for the third time, the LORD called to Samuel. He got up, went to Eli, and said, “Here I am, for you have called me.” Then Eli realized that it was the LORD who was calling the boy.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·yō·sep̄ baš·šə·li·šîṯ Yah·weh qə·rō- šə·mū·’êl way·yā·qām way·yê·leḵ ’el- ‘ê·lî way·yō·mer hin·nî kî qā·rā·ṯā lî ‘ê·lî kî way·yā·ḇen Yah·weh qō·rê lan·nā·‘ar
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-added YHWH to-call Samuel in-the-third. And-he-arose and-went unto-Eli and-said: Behold-me, for thou-calledst to-me. And-discerned Eli that YHWH [was] calling to-the-boy.
Where the English smooths the original
The sleeping child is awakened by a voice uttering his name. He naturally supposes it is his half-blind old master summoning him. The same thing occurs a second and a third time. Then it flashed upon Eli the boy had had no dream.The dialogue Ellicott reconstructs ("Where did the voice come from?") is his imaginative filling of the scene, not in the text.
Such was the corruption of those times that the chief priest had become dull and negligent to understand the Lord's appearing.Geneva reads Eli's slowness as a symptom of the age; Pulpit, on the same verse, reads his eventual discernment more generously. The Hebrew reports only that he discerned at the third call.
9“Go and lie down,” he said to Samuel, “and if He calls you, say, ‘Speak, LORD, for Your servant is listening.’” So Samuel went and lay down in his place.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
lêḵ šə·ḵāḇ ‘ê·lî way·yō·mer liš·mū·’êl wə·hā·yāh ’im- yiq·rā ’ê·le·ḵā wə·’ā·mar·tā dab·bêr Yah·weh kî ‘aḇ·de·ḵā šō·mê·a‘ šə·mū·’êl way·yê·leḵ way·yiš·kaḇ bim·qō·w·mōw
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-said Eli to-Samuel: Go, lie-down. And-it-shall-be, if he-calls unto-thee, then-thou-shalt-say: Speak, YHWH, for hearing [is] thy-servant. And-went Samuel and-lay-down in-his-place.
Where the English smooths the original
10Then the LORD came and stood there, calling as before, “Samuel! Samuel!” And Samuel answered, “Speak, for Your servant is listening.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
Yah·weh way·yā·ḇō way·yiṯ·yaṣ·ṣaḇ way·yiq·rā ḵə·p̄a·‘am- bə·p̄a·‘am šə·mū·’êl šə·mū·’êl šə·mū·’êl way·yō·mer dab·bêr kî ‘aḇ·de·ḵā šō·mê·a‘
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-came YHWH and-stationed-himself, and-called as-stroke in-stroke: Samuel! Samuel! And-said Samuel: Speak, for hearing [is] thy-servant.
Where the English smooths the original
The Heb. is emphatic: presented himself. The Voice became a Vision ( 1 Samuel 3:15 ). Cp. Genesis 15:1 ; Numbers 12:6-8 . The visible manifestations of Jehovah or the Angel of Jehovah in the O. T. were foreshadowings of the Incarnation.Cambridge's closing clause is a theological judgment, not a statement about the Hebrew; it is the one place in this unit where a commentator draws the line to the Incarnation directly.
A personal presence, not a mere voice, or impression upon Samuel's mind, is here distinctly indicated.
he leaves out the word Lord, which Eli bid him use; for he might be afraid as yet to make mention of the name of the Lord in the vision of prophecy, as Kimchi speaksGill's reasons for the omission are conjecture (Kimchi and Jarchi); the omission itself is in the text.
11Then the LORD said to Samuel, “I am about to do something in Israel at which the ears of all who hear it will tingle.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
Yah·weh way·yō·mer ’el- šə·mū·’êl hin·nêh ’ā·nō·ḵî ‘ō·śeh ḏā·ḇār bə·yiś·rā·’êl ’ă·šer šə·tê ’ā·zə·nāw kāl- šō·mə·‘ōw tə·ṣil·le·nāh
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-said YHWH unto-Samuel: Behold, I [am] doing a-word in-Israel at-which everyone-hearing-it, they-shall-ring, the-two-of his-ears.
Where the English smooths the original
I am doing. The catastrophe is certain. With God the future is as the present.
This implies the announcement of some event so frightful and unlooked for that the news shall, as it were, slap both ears at once, and make them smart with pain.
The calamity which is here referred to was the capture of the Ark of the Covenant.The identification is drawn from 1 Samuel 4, not from this verse; Ellicott, Barnes, Cambridge and Pulpit agree on it independently.
12On that day I will carry out against Eli everything I have spoken about his house, from beginning to end.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ha·hū bay·yō·wm ’ā·qîm ’el- ‘ê·lî ’êṯ kāl- ’ă·šer dib·bar·tî ’el- bê·ṯōw hā·ḥêl wə·ḵal·lêh
Literal — word-for-word from the original
In-the-day the-that I-will-raise-up against-Eli all that I-have-spoken unto-his-house: beginning and-finishing.
Where the English smooths the original
I will excite and stir up into active energy all the denunciations of the man of God ( 1 Samuel 2:27 ), which hitherto have been as it were asleep and at rest.
In that time which I have appointed for this work, which was about twenty or thirty years after this threatening. So long space of repentance God allows to this wicked generation.The interval of twenty or thirty years is Benson's reckoning from the later narrative, not a figure given in the text.
he began in the death of Hophni and Phinehas, and went on in the slaughter of Abimelech, and the eighty five priests at Nob, in the times of Saul, and finished in the thrusting out of Abiathar from the priesthood, in the times of Solomon
13I told him that I would judge his house forever for the iniquity of which he knows, because his sons blasphemed God and he did not restrain them.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·hig·gaḏ·tî lōw kî- ’ă·nî ’eṯ- šō·p̄êṭ bê·ṯōw ‘aḏ- ‘ō·w·lām ba·‘ă·wōn ’ă·šer- yā·ḏa‘ kî- bā·nāw mə·qal·lîm lā·hem wə·lō ḵi·hāh bām
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-I-have-declared to-him that judging [am] I his-house unto-forever, for-the-iniquity which he-knew: that cursing [were] to-themselves his-sons, and-he-did-not weaken them.
Where the English smooths the original
Elsewhere the Heb. word always means to curse , or to blaspheme , and is here best rendered made themselves accursed. There is a Jewish tradition that the original reading was ‘cursed me ,’ which was altered by the scribes from motives of reverence.
But while thus there is much uncertainty about the right text, the evidence is too uncertain to act uponPulpit reviews the same tradition Cambridge reports and declines to emend; the two together show a real and unresolved textual question, not a settled one.
he did not frown upon and knit his brows at them in righteous anger, as the word means
14Therefore I have sworn to the house of Eli, ‘The iniquity of Eli’s house shall never be atoned for by sacrifice or offering.’”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·lā·ḵên niš·ba‘·tî lə·ḇêṯ ‘ê·lî ‘ă·wōn ‘ê·lî bêṯ- ’im- ‘aḏ- ‘ō·w·lām yiṯ·kap·pêr bə·ze·ḇaḥ ū·ḇə·min·ḥāh
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-therefore I-have-sworn to-the-house-of Eli: if [ever] shall-be-covered the-iniquity of-the-house-of-Eli by-sacrifice or-by-offering, unto-forever!
Where the English smooths the original
The sons of Eli had sinned, ‘with a high hand,’ against light and warnings, and for such unrepentant presumptuous offenders the Law had no atonement
in the sacrificial theory of the Mosaic Law we see there was a limit to the efficacy of sacrifice after a certain point in sin and evil example had been reached
The sin of the sons of Eli could not be purged by the appointed sacrifices of the Law. In blessed contrast with this declaration is the assurance of the New Testament
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
The unit opens on a participle, not an event: מְשָׁרֵת (mə·šā·rêṯ, H8334), Samuel kept serving. Maclaren hears a refrain carried over from 1 Samuel 2:11 and 2:18, and sets it against its background without softening either: "A demoralised priesthood, an alienated people, a silent God." Ellicott presses the same contrast in narrative terms, the grown priests "prostituted the holy work to their own vile worldly ends" while the child ministered in his little white robe. The silence is described twice and precisely. יָקָר (yā·qār, H3368) means costly; Benson and Poole keep the price in it ("such things being most precious in men's esteem"), Maclaren and Cambridge insist the point is only frequency, and the Hebrew genuinely holds both. The second clause is sharper than any English: נִפְרָץ (nip̄·rāṣ, H6555) is a Niphal of the verb for a wall breached or water bursting out. K&D: "to spread out strongly, to break through copiously." Gill reports the rendering perrupta and the image of vision "like water pent up, that cannot break through its fences." Then three circumstantial clauses hold the night still, and K&D shows that the sentence they begin does not finish until v. 4. Everything in them is unfinished: eyes that had begun (הֵחֵלּוּ, H2490) to dim, a lamp not yet (טֶרֶם, H2962) out. Ellicott preserves the rabbinic reading of that lamp from Kiddushin 72b, "The sun of Eli had not set before that of Samuel rose," and Gill repeats it. K&D and Cambridge both establish that הֵיכַל (H1964) here is not a holy place but the whole tabernacle "as the palace of the God-king," which makes the boy a sleeper on the floor of a throne room.
God calls by name, and the boy answers correctly every time: הִנֵּנִי (hin·nê·nî, H2005), "Behold me," which Cambridge identifies as "the regular formula for expressing attention to a call and readiness to obey," citing Genesis 22:1 and Isaiah 6:8. Gill notes it "was not intended to declare the place where he was." The obedience is not in question; the address is. Hebrew marks the cooling of a child's eagerness in a way no English version shows: at the first call he runs (וַיָּרָץ, rûwts, H7323, which Poole takes as proof of "his great faithfulness and diligence" and Cambridge as "alacrity to serve the aged priest"), and at the second and third he only arises and goes. JFB infers from the running that his chamber adjoined Eli's and that night calls were routine. Twice Eli sends him back with two bare imperatives, שׁוּב שְׁכָב, "return, lie-down," and once, only once, adds בְנִי, "my son," which Gill reads as affection meant to keep the child from being abashed. Verse 7 supplies the narrator's own explanation, and the commentators are unanimous that it is not a charge of impiety: Cambridge says the knowing in question is "not the general religious knowledge of a pious Israelite, but the special knowledge communicated by a personal revelation"; Benson, that Samuel "was not acquainted with the way wherein God made himself and his mind known unto the prophets"; Pulpit, that he knew God in conscience but not "as one who reveals his will unto men." K&D defends the rare perfect after טֶרֶם from Psalm 90:2 and Proverbs 8:25 rather than emending it. At the third call Eli discerns (וַיָּבֶן, bîyn, H995, "to separate mentally"). Geneva judges the delay severely, "the chief priest had become dull and negligent to understand the Lord's appearing"; Pulpit judges the recognition kindly. Gill passes on Aben Ezra's point that Eli lay nearer the ark than Samuel and still heard nothing. Whatever else is true of him, the old man's last act of office in this chapter is to teach a boy how to answer God, and Henry will not let the reader miss it: "Though it was a disgrace to Eli, for God's call to be directed to Samuel, yet he told him how to meet it."
The fourth call is different in kind, and the verbs say so. וַיָּבֹא and וַיִּתְיַצַּב (yâtsab, H3320, Hitpael): he came and stationed himself. Cambridge renders it "The Heb. is emphatic: presented himself," adds that "The Voice became a Vision," and is alone among these authors in drawing the line forward: the visible manifestations of Jehovah in the Old Testament "were foreshadowings of the Incarnation." Barnes agrees on the fact if not the trajectory: "A personal presence, not a mere voice, or impression upon Samuel's mind, is here distinctly indicated." K&D insists on the same point against the psychologizing reading: "These words show that the revelation of God was an objectively real affair, and not a mere dream of Samuel's." Benson and Poole record Kimchi's view that the verb implies a glorious appearance, on the analogy of the angel standing to oppose Balaam. Pulpit adds the philological support from v. 15, where the word for what Samuel saw is marʼeh, a waking sight, not hazon, the ecstatic vision of v. 1. Then the name is doubled, שְׁמוּאֵל שְׁמוּאֵל, which Poole says is "to engage him to the more speedy and diligent attention." And Samuel answers with Eli's words minus one: the interlinear shows no divine name in his reply. Gill saw it and did not explain it away: "he leaves out the word Lord, which Eli bid him use," whether from fear, or because the boy was still not certain. The most famous sentence of this chapter is, in the Hebrew, slightly shorter and considerably more frightened than the version usually quoted.
What the silent God finally says is a sentence of judgment on the house that housed the boy. "I am doing," not "I will do": Cambridge, "The catastrophe is certain. With God the future is as the present"; Pulpit, the ruin "is already in actual progress." The idiom of v. 11 is violent. תְּצִלֶּינָה (tsâlal, H6750) is a verb of tingling or ringing, and Pulpit gives it the force of a blow: "the news shall, as it were, slap both ears at once, and make them smart with pain." Poole compares the ringing left by thunder. Ellicott, Barnes, Cambridge and Pulpit agree on the referent: the capture of the ark, which Ellicott calls "a calamity unparalleled in their annals," and all four note that this rare phrase recurs only at 2 Kings 21:12 and Jeremiah 19:3, of the fall of Jerusalem. Verse 12 is built on two infinitive absolutes, הָחֵל וְכַלֵּה, "beginning and ending"; Cambridge and K&D read it as completeness, Barnes as "I will go through with the performance from first to last," and Gill traces the slow execution from Hophni and Phinehas through the eighty-five priests at Nob to Abiathar's expulsion under Solomon. Benson, honestly, puts twenty or thirty years of unused mercy between the threat and the blow. Verse 13 is the hardest verse in the unit textually, and the authors do not hide it: Cambridge reports the Jewish tradition that the original read "cursed me" and was "altered by the scribes from motives of reverence"; Pulpit weighs the same evidence and concludes "the evidence is too uncertain to act upon." Benson gives כִהָה its etymological sense, Eli "did not frown upon and knit his brows at them in righteous anger." Then the oath closes the door: K&D notes that אִם here is "a particle used in an oath, equivalent to assuredly not," and that "The oath makes the sentence irrevocable." Cambridge identifies the legal ground precisely, sin "with a high hand" for which, by Numbers 15:27 to 31, "the Law had no atonement." Ellicott draws the theological conclusion the Law itself permits: "there was a limit to the efficacy of sacrifice." Barnes sets the New Testament's answer beside it without pretending the Law contained it.
⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested against the text. Read the chapter by its not-yets. The lamp is not yet out; the eyes have only begun to fail; the boy does not yet know; the word is not yet uncovered. Nothing in 1 Samuel 3 has finished dying, and that is precisely when God speaks. He does not wait for the priesthood to collapse before raising a prophet, and he does not wait for the prophet to be ready before calling him by name. Notice what the call does not require. Samuel has the right answer from the first summons, hinnênî, behold me, the word of Abraham and of Isaiah. What he lacks is not willingness but an address, and God supplies that through the very man the message will condemn. Eli cannot see, cannot govern his sons, and cannot avert his own sentence, and he is still the one who teaches the child the sentence that will receive it: speak, for your servant is listening. Grace in this chapter runs through a failing institution without pausing to repair it first. And then the smallest detail in the unit, which Gill alone among these authors reports: when the boy finally answers, he drops the divine name. Eli told him to say "Speak, LORD"; the Hebrew of v. 10 records only "Speak, for your servant is listening." A first prophetic word is not fearless. It is short, and it leaves out what it is not yet sure of, and God accepts it and speaks anyway. What he then says would be easier to bear if it were not addressed to a child sleeping in the house of the man it destroys. The unit refuses the comfort of separating vocation from cost: Samuel's call and Eli's ruin are the same word. The line printed beside this reading is the tool's own sentence, not a verse of Scripture.
God did not raise his voice; he said a name until the boy stopped running to the wrong father.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
Verse 1 is not a fresh beginning but a return. Maclaren states it plainly: "The opening words of this passage are substantially repeated from 1 Samuel 2:11, 1 Samuel 2:18. They come as a kind of refrain, contrasting the quiet, continuous growth and holy service of the child Samuel with the black narrative of Eli's riotous sons." The Verifier confirms the verbal overlap at the level of the words themselves: נַעַר (H5288), שָׁרַת (H8334) and עֵלִי (H5941) co-occur in both verses in the same clause. The refrain is the writer's structural device for holding two stories in one frame: whenever he is about to record another stage of the priesthood's collapse, he first reminds the reader that a child is quietly serving in the same building.
1 Samuel 2:11 · 1 Samuel 2:18
basis: Verifier basis for 1 Samuel 2:11: shared H5941 ʻÊlîy (rare, in 30 vv), H5288 naʻar (in 221 vv), H8334 shârath (in 92 vv). The three lexemes co-occur in one clause in both verses, which is verbal repetition within a single author's work; Maclaren independently names it a refrain. 1 Samuel 2:18 is not in the Verifier candidate list and is included on Maclaren's naming of it, not on a computed basis.
The threat of v. 11 uses an idiom so unusual that the commentators track every occurrence of it. Barnes: "This expressive phrase occurs again twice." Ellicott: "The expression is a very singular one, and re-occurs in 2 Kings 21:12, and Jeremiah 19:3, on the occasion of the destruction of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar." Cambridge adds that in Jeremiah "there may be a tacit reference to this passage," and both Barnes and Pulpit note that Jeremiah repeatedly compares the fall of Jerusalem to the fall of Shiloh (Jeremiah 7:12, 14; 26:6, 9). The link is real and the honest caution is this: the Verifier's computed overlap with these two verses rests on common particles, not on the tingling verb צָלַל (H6750) itself. The recurrence of the idiom is reported by named commentators; the machine basis alone would not carry it.
2 Kings 21:12 · Jeremiah 19:3 · Jeremiah 7:12
basis: Verifier-computed shared lexemes are weak and common: for 2 Kings 21:12, H2005 hên (in 311 vv); for Jeremiah 19:3, H4725 mâqôwm (in 379 vv) and H2005 hên (in 311 vv). No shared Strong's entry for the tingling verb H6750 was returned. The recurrence of the full idiom is attested by Barnes, Ellicott, Cambridge, Pulpit and K&D, so the link is recorded as thematic rather than verbal. Jeremiah 7:12 is not in the candidate list and rests on Barnes's and Pulpit's citation.
Verse 3 places Samuel בְּהֵיכַל יְהוָה, in the hêykâl of YHWH, and the same noun appears at 1 Samuel 1:9, where Eli sat on his seat by the doorpost of the hêykâl and Hannah prayed. K&D uses that verse to fix the meaning here: not the holy place, but "the whole tabernacle, the tent with its court, as the palace of the God-king, as in 1 Samuel 1:9; Psalm 11:4." Cambridge concurs, adding that the chambers around it housed the priests. The link binds the two nights of this book: at the door of the palace a barren woman asked for a son, and inside the palace the son is called by the king. Eli is present and slow to understand at both.
1 Samuel 1:9 · Psalm 11:4
basis: Verifier basis for 1 Samuel 1:9: shared H5941 ʻÊlîy (in 30 vv) twice and H1964 hêykâl (in 76 vv). The hêykâl overlap is a genuine shared lexeme, but the word is not rare enough on its own to carry a quotation claim, so the tier is held at structural. Psalm 11:4 is not in the candidate list and is carried on K&D's citation.
God's message to Samuel does not deliver a new sentence; it ratifies one. "On that day I will carry out against Eli everything I have spoken about his house" refers back to the nameless man of God of 1 Samuel 2:27 to 36, as Gill, Cambridge, Pulpit, Benson and K&D all state. Pulpit gives the Hebrew verb its picture: אָקִים is "I will raise up," that is, "I will excite and stir up into active energy all the denunciations of the man of God, which hitherto have been as it were asleep and at rest." Gill draws the conclusion for the book's order of composition, that chapter 2's prophecy "was antecedent to this, contrary to the sense of some." Pulpit adds a moral reading worth weighing: the first oracle spelled out the severity to give room for repentance, and this one, spoken through a child, is briefer because no further moral object would be served.
1 Samuel 2:27 · 1 Samuel 2:30
basis: Verifier basis for 1 Samuel 2:27: shared H5941 ʻÊlîy (in 30 vv) three times, which alone is a weak basis since the name recurs throughout these chapters. The real link is the text's own explicit back-reference (kol-ʼăsher dibbartî ʼel-bêṯô, everything I have spoken about his house) as identified by Gill, Cambridge, Pulpit, Benson and K&D. 1 Samuel 2:30 is carried on K&D's citation, not on a computed basis.
⚙ Two lexical echoes run inside this unit that no English version can show. First, Eli's eyes had begun to fail, הֵחֵלּוּ (châlal, H2490, v. 2), and God's sentence in v. 12 is executed הָחֵל וְכַלֵּה, "beginning and ending" (H2490 again). Second, the eyes were כֵהוֹת (kêheh, H3544, "feeble, obscure"), and what Eli failed to do to his sons in v. 13 is כִהָה (kâhâh, H3543, "to be weak"), a verb Pulpit glosses "to weaken, humble, reduce to powerlessness." The man whose sight grew weak would not weaken his sons. The caution belongs in the same breath: H2490 in the sense of beginning is a very common verb, and H3544 and H3543 are separate Strong's entries, cognate but not identical. The sourced facts are the lexicon entries and the parses; the resonance between them is this tool's reading and nothing more.
1 Samuel 3:2 · 1 Samuel 3:12 · 1 Samuel 3:13
basis: Half-sourced, and flagged deliberately. Sourced: the brief's interlinear carries H2490 châlal at both 3:2 (hê·ḥêl·lū, Hifil perfect) and 3:12 (hā·ḥêl, Hifil infinitive absolute), and the lexicon gives H3544 kêheh (feeble, obscure) at 3:2 beside H3543 kâhâh (to be weak) at 3:13. Not sourced: no commentator in this brief draws either echo; no Verifier frequency was computed, since both members of each pair lie inside this unit; H3544 and H3543 are cognate but distinct Strong's entries; and H2490 in the sense of beginning is a common verb. The claim that the author intended a play is this tool's alone and should be checked against a Hebrew concordance before it is relied on.
Cambridge, glossing "was rare," sets v. 1 beside two texts that name the same condition as a judgment: "In the general decay of religion, prophetic communications from God had almost entirely ceased. Cp. Amos 8:11; Psalm 74:9." Amos threatens a famine "not of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD"; Psalm 74:9 laments that there is no more any prophet. K&D supplies the theology behind the silence: God had promised prophets (Deuteronomy 18:15), but "as a revelation from God presupposed susceptibility on the part of men, the unbelief and disobedience of the people might restrain the fulfilment," and God "might even withdraw His word to punish the idolatrous nation." The silence of 1 Samuel 3:1 is not divine absence. It is, on this reading, a sentence already in force, and the boy's call is its lifting.
Amos 8:11 · Psalm 74:9 · Deuteronomy 18:15
basis: No Verifier-computed shared lexeme: none of these three references appears in the thread candidate list, and no shared Strong's basis is claimed. The link is recorded entirely on Cambridge's citation of Amos 8:11 and Psalm 74:9 and K&D's citation of Deuteronomy 18:15, and stands or falls with those named sources.
Barnes and Gill both close their notes on v. 1 by pointing forward: "Samuel is mentioned as the first of the series of prophets, Acts 3:24" (Barnes); Gill adds that the drought of vision "served to set off with greater foil the glory of Samuel as a prophet of the Lord." Pulpit enlarges the claim to institutional history: Samuel was "called by the providence of God to be the founder of prophecy as an established institution, and henceforward, side by side with the king and priest, the prophet took his place as one of the three factors in the preparation for the coming of him who is a king to rule, a Priest to make atonement, and also a Prophet to teach his people." The link is between a Hebrew narrative and a Greek sermon, so no shared lexeme can support it; Peter's naming of Samuel as the head of the line is what carries it.
Acts 3:24
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's numbers are impossible in principle and none is claimed; this can never be tiered verbal. The basis is the explicit naming of Samuel as first of the prophetic series in Acts 3:24, cited independently by Barnes and Gill, plus Pulpit's reading of Samuel as founder of the prophetic office.
The oath of v. 14 is not a suspension of the sacrificial system but an application of it. Cambridge names the statute: "The sons of Eli had sinned, ‘with a high hand,’ against light and warnings, and for such unrepentant presumptuous offenders the Law had no atonement" (his citation is Numbers 15:27-31), and he adds the limit of his own claim, that the words refer "in the first instance" to the temporal punishment of Eli's family, comparing Isaiah 22:14. Pulpit identifies the two offerings named as the zebach, the blood sacrifice, and the minchah, the unbloody one, so that the pair covers the whole range. Ellicott states the doctrine the passage forces: "in the sacrificial theory of the Mosaic Law we see there was a limit to the efficacy of sacrifice." K&D notes that אִם is the oath particle, "equivalent to assuredly not," and that "The oath makes the sentence irrevocable."
Numbers 15:27-31 · Isaiah 22:14
basis: No Verifier-computed shared lexeme: neither reference appears in the candidate list and no shared Strong's basis is claimed. The link rests on Cambridge's citation of Numbers 15:27-31 and Isaiah 22:14 as the legal category (presumptuous sin, for which no offering is prescribed) matching the oath of 1 Samuel 3:14, supported by Pulpit's identification of zebach (H2077) and minchâh (H4503) as the exhaustive pair of offering types.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
Four of these authors, working independently, make the same connection. Ellicott: "Josephus tells us that Samuel, when the Lord first called him, was twelve years old. This was the age of the child Jesus when He disputed with the doctors in the Temple." Cambridge names the custom behind it, that a Jewish boy became "a son of the Law" at twelve, and cites Luke 2:42. Barnes and JFB report the same age from Josephus without drawing the line. Ellicott's comparison is a comparison, not a prophecy, and the age itself comes from Josephus rather than from Scripture, which is worth saying plainly. What the parallel does hold is a shape: in both cases a child is found in the house of God, occupied with his Father's business, while the established custodians of that house are somewhere behind him. Ellicott quotes Theodoret on the point: "See how God loves holiness in children. The child Samuel was preferred by Him to Eli, the aged high priest and judge."
Luke 2:42 · 1 Samuel 3:1
⚙ The answer Eli teaches and Samuel gives is a servant's answer: דַּבֵּר כִּי שֹׁמֵעַ עַבְדֶּךָ, speak, for your servant is hearing. ʻebed (H5650) is the plain word for a slave, and shâmaʻ (H8085) in Strong's carries "hear intelligently (often with implication of attention, obedience)." Hearing and obeying are one act in this verb. The reading offered here is that this posture, not the office, is what the Old Testament finally calls the Servant: the one whose ear is opened morning by morning and who is not rebellious (Isaiah 50:4 to 5). Samuel gives the answer while leaving out the divine name, as Gill observed of the Hebrew of v. 10; the Servant of Isaiah gives it without reservation. Cambridge, at this very verse, is the voice that opens the christological door here: the visible manifestations of Jehovah in the Old Testament "were foreshadowings of the Incarnation." That the one who came and stood beside a sleeping boy is the same who would later be found sleeping in a boat is this tool's reading, not the commentators'.
1 Samuel 3:10 · Isaiah 50:4-5
Verse 14 is one of the few places where Scripture names a sin the sacrificial system was not built to cover, and the older commentators do not soften it. Cambridge: "for such unrepentant presumptuous offenders the Law had no atonement" (Numbers 15:27 to 31). Ellicott: "No earthly sacrifice, bloody or unbloody, should ever purge on earth the sin of the doomed high priestly house," and he calls this "a great theological truth." Barnes sets the contrast in the plainest terms available to him: "The sin of the sons of Eli could not be purged by the appointed sacrifices of the Law. In blessed contrast with this declaration is the assurance of the New Testament, 1 John 1:7; Acts 13:39." Ellicott goes further and asks whether Eli himself, receiving the sentence in quiet resignation, looked past it: did such men not see "as in a glass darkly, the blood of another Victim, which should cleanse the repentant and sorrowing sinner from all sin?" That last is Ellicott's question, offered as a question. The grammar of the verse, as K&D notes, is an oath, and an oath cannot be revised. If the sentence is ever answered, it is answered by something the Law did not contain.
1 John 1:7 · Acts 13:39 · Numbers 15:27-31
Pulpit reads the whole chapter as the founding of an office, and states the redemptive-historical point explicitly at v. 1: Samuel was "called by the providence of God to be the founder of prophecy as an established institution, and henceforward, side by side with the king and priest, the prophet took his place as one of the three factors in the preparation for the coming of him who is a king to rule, a Priest to make atonement, and also a Prophet to teach his people and guide them into all the truth." This is the classical threefold-office reading, and it is Pulpit's own words, not a later imposition. Note what the chapter contributes to it: the prophetic office is instituted in the same night that the priestly house is condemned, and by the same word. The third factor arrives because the second has failed.
1 Samuel 3:1 · 1 Samuel 3:11-14
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
⚙ Honesty notes for this unit.
Verse 13 is textually disputed and this synthesis does not resolve it. The Masoretic text reads מְקַלְלִים לָהֶם, "cursing to/for themselves." Cambridge reports "a Jewish tradition that the original reading was 'cursed me,' which was altered by the scribes from motives of reverence" (one of the tiqqune sopherim); Pulpit cites Buxtorf for the same and then declines to act on it, "the evidence is too uncertain to act upon"; Gill reports the same tradition and the Septuagint's "his sons spake ill of God"; Barnes and K&D render "bringing a curse upon themselves" without emendation. BSB's "blasphemed God" follows the Greek reading. The brief's interlinear glosses word 14 as "blasphemed God" and leaves word 15 (lā·hem) unglossed, which reflects the same difficulty. Readers should know the English they are holding has chosen a side.
Word indices do not follow Hebrew word order. The Berean interlinear reorders words to track the English, most visibly at 3:4 (YHWH indexed before the verb), 3:8, 3:9, 3:10 and 3:12. The literal lines above are built from the Hebrew order, not the index order, so index numbers in the notes will not always run left to right through the literal rendering.
Two glosses in the brief are placeholders. At 3:2 word 5 and 3:11 word 10 and 3:13 word 7 the gloss column reads "vvv" or a row of dots, meaning the word is carried into an adjacent English phrase rather than glossed separately. The parse and Strong's number for those words are given and were used; the English gloss for them was not available.
What is not sourced. The age of twelve comes from Josephus (reported by Ellicott, Barnes, JFB, Cambridge and Gill), not from Scripture. The identification of the calamity of v. 11 with the capture of the ark is the commentators' inference from chapter 4, unanimous but still an inference. Ellicott's reconstructed dialogue at v. 8 and the rabbinic lamp figure at v. 3 (Kiddushin 72b, and Stanley's paragraph that Ellicott quotes) are reported as what they are. The wordplay between kêheh (3:2) and kâhâh (3:13), and the reuse of châlal in 3:2 and 3:12, are this tool's observations from the brief's own lexicon and parses; no commentator here draws them, and no Verifier frequency was computed for them.
On the threads. Only the 1 Samuel 2:11 link carries a verbal tier, and it does so on the rare lexeme ʻÊlîy (30 vv) together with two others in one clause. Every cross-Testament link here (Acts 3:24, Luke 2:42, 1 John 1:7, Acts 13:39) is tiered structural or carried in the christ section, never verbal, because Greek and Hebrew cannot share a Strong's number. Three threads rest entirely on named commentators' citations with no machine basis at all, and each says so in its badge. One thread, the internal wordplay between 3:2, 3:12 and 3:13, is tiered flagged because no source in this brief asserts it; the lexemes behind it are sourced, the intention read into them is not.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)