Then Rehoboam went to Shechem, for all Israel had gone there to make him king.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
rə·ḥaḇ·‘ām way·yê·leḵ šə·ḵe·māh kî ḵāl yiś·rā·’êl bā·’ū šə·ḵem lə·ham·lîḵ ’ō·ṯōw
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
Rebellion against Rehoboam
2 Chronicles 10:1–15 — Rebellion against Rehoboam. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
Then Rehoboam went to Shechem, for all Israel had gone there to make him king.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
rə·ḥaḇ·‘ām way·yê·leḵ šə·ḵe·māh kî ḵāl yiś·rā·’êl bā·’ū šə·ḵem lə·ham·lîḵ ’ō·ṯōw
When Jeroboam son of Nebat heard about this, he returned from Egypt, where he had fled from King Solomon.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·hî yā·rā·ḇə·‘ām ben- nə·ḇāṭ kiš·mō·a‘ yā·rā·ḇə·‘ām way·yā·šāḇ mim·miṣ·rā·yim wə·hū ḇə·miṣ·ra·yim ’ă·šer bā·raḥ ham·me·leḵ šə·lō·mōh mip·pə·nê
So they sent for Jeroboam, and he and all Israel came to Rehoboam and said,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·yiš·lə·ḥū way·yiq·rə·’ū- lōw yā·rā·ḇə·‘ām wə·ḵāl yiś·rā·’êl way·yā·ḇō ’el- rə·ḥaḇ·‘ām way·ḏab·bə·rū lê·mōr
“Your father put a heavy yoke on us. But now you must lighten the burden of your father’s service and the heavy yoke he put on us, and we will serve you.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
’ā·ḇî·ḵā hiq·šāh ‘ul·lê·nū ’eṯ- wə·‘at·tāh hā·qêl haq·qā·šāh ’ā·ḇî·ḵā mê·‘ă·ḇō·ḏaṯ hak·kā·ḇêḏ ’ă·šer- ū·mê·‘ul·lōw nā·ṯan ‘ā·lê·nū wə·na·‘aḇ·ḏe·kā
Rehoboam answered, “Come back to me in three days.” So the people departed.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·yō·mer wə·šū·ḇū ’ê·lāy ’ă·lê·hem ‘ō·wḏ šə·lō·šeṯ yā·mîm hā·‘ām way·yê·leḵ
Then King Rehoboam consulted with the elders who had served his father Solomon during his lifetime. “How do you advise me to respond to these people?” he asked.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ham·me·leḵ rə·ḥaḇ·‘ām way·yiw·wā·‘aṣ ’eṯ- haz·zə·qê·nîm ’ă·šer- hā·yū ‘ō·mə·ḏîm lip̄·nê ’ā·ḇîw šə·lō·mōh bih·yō·ṯōw ḥay ’êḵ ’at·tem nō·w·‘ā·ṣîm lə·hā·šîḇ dā·ḇār haz·zeh lā·‘ām- lê·mōr
They replied, “If you will be kind to these people and please them by speaking kind words to them, they will be your servants forever.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·ḏab·bə·rū ’ê·lāw lê·mōr ’im- tih·yeh lə·ṭō·wḇ haz·zeh lə·hā·‘ām ū·rə·ṣî·ṯām wə·ḏib·bar·tā ṭō·w·ḇîm də·ḇā·rîm ’ă·lê·hem wə·hā·yū lə·ḵā ‘ă·ḇā·ḏîm kāl- hay·yā·mîm
But Rehoboam rejected the advice of the elders; instead, he consulted the young men who had grown up with him and served him.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·ya·‘ă·zōḇ ’eṯ- ‘ă·ṣaṯ haz·zə·qê·nîm ’ă·šer yə·‘ā·ṣu·hū way·yiw·wā·‘aṣ ’eṯ- hay·lā·ḏîm ’ă·šer gā·ḏə·lū ’it·tōw hā·‘ō·mə·ḏîm lə·p̄ā·nāw
He asked them, “What message do you advise that we send back to these people who have spoken to me, saying, ‘Lighten the yoke your father put on us’?”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·yō·mer ’ă·lê·hem māh dā·ḇār ’eṯ- ’at·tem nō·w·‘ā·ṣîm wə·nā·šîḇ haz·zeh hā·‘ām ’ă·šer dib·bə·rū ’ê·lay lê·mōr hā·qêl min- hā·‘ōl ’ă·šer- ’ā·ḇî·ḵā nā·ṯan ‘ā·lê·nū
The young men who had grown up with him replied, “This is how you should answer these people who said to you, ‘Your father made our yoke heavy, but you must make it lighter.’ This is what you should tell them: ‘My little finger is thicker than my father’s waist!
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hay·lā·ḏîm ’ă·šer gā·ḏə·lū ’it·tōw ’it·tōw way·ḏab·bə·rū kōh- lê·mōr ṯō·mar lā·‘ām ’ă·šer- dib·bə·rū ’ê·le·ḵā lê·mōr ’ā·ḇî·ḵā ‘ul·lê·nū hiḵ·bîḏ ’eṯ- wə·’at·tāh hā·qêl mê·‘ā·lê·nū kōh tō·mar ’ă·lê·hem qā·ṭān·nî ‘ā·ḇāh ’ā·ḇî mim·mā·ṯə·nê
Whereas my father burdened you with a heavy yoke, I will add to your yoke. Whereas my father scourged you with whips, I will scourge you with scorpions.’”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·‘at·tāh ’ā·ḇî he‘·mîs kā·ḇêḏ ‘ōl wa·’ă·nî ’ō·sîp̄ ‘al- ‘ă·lê·ḵem ‘ul·lə·ḵem ’ā·ḇî yis·sar ’eṯ·ḵem baš·šō·w·ṭîm wa·’ă·nî bā·‘ăq·rab·bîm
After three days, Jeroboam and all the people returned to Rehoboam, since the king had said, “Come back to me on the third day.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
haš·šə·li·šî bay·yō·wm yā·rā·ḇə·‘ām wə·ḵāl hā·‘ām way·yā·ḇō ’el- rə·ḥaḇ·‘ām ka·’ă·šer ham·me·leḵ dib·ber lê·mōr šū·ḇū ’ê·lay haš·šə·li·šî bay·yō·wm
And the king answered them harshly. King Rehoboam rejected the advice of the elders
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ham·me·leḵ way·ya·‘ă·nêm qā·šāh ham·me·leḵ rə·ḥaḇ·‘ām ’êṯ way·ya·‘ă·zōḇ ‘ă·ṣaṯ haz·zə·qê·nîm
and spoke to them as the young men had advised, saying, “Whereas my father made your yoke heavy, I will add to your yoke. Whereas my father scourged you with whips, I will scourge you with scorpions.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·ḏab·bêr ’ă·lê·hem hay·lā·ḏîm ka·‘ă·ṣaṯ lê·mōr ‘ul·lə·ḵem ’aḵ·bîḏ ’eṯ- wa·’ă·nî ’ō·sîp̄ ‘ā·lāw ’ā·ḇî yis·sar ’eṯ·ḵem baš·šō·w·ṭîm wa·’ă·nî bā·‘ăq·rab·bîm
So the king did not listen to the people, and indeed this turn of events was from God, in order that the LORD might fulfill the word that He had spoken through Ahijah the Shilonite to Jeroboam son of Nebat.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ham·me·leḵ wə·lō- šā·ma‘ ’el- hā·‘ām kî- nə·sib·bāh hā·yə·ṯāh mê·‘im hā·’ĕ·lō·hîm lə·ma·‘an Yah·weh ’eṯ- hā·qîm də·ḇā·rōw ’ă·šer dib·ber bə·yaḏ ’ă·ḥî·yā·hū haš·ši·lō·w·nî ’el- yā·rā·ḇə·‘ām ben- nə·ḇāṭ
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
The Chronicler has already said that Rehoboam reigned in his father's stead, and yet the king must travel. שְׁכֶ֑מָה carries the directional ending Ellicott records ("with accusative ending; Kings, Sh'kem"), and the place is not neutral ground: Pulpit calls Shechem "the ancient capital, and the prized position of the high-spirited tribe of Ephraim," Cambridge notes only that it was "Chosen for its central position." Pulpit then declines the obvious political reading, holding that the journey was probably not a designed stroke of policy to flatter Ephraim at all. What forces the issue is the grammar: לְהַמְלִ֥יךְ is a Hifil, to cause him to reign, and its subject is all Israel. Cambridge grounds that in precedent, the people claiming "their ancient right to a voice in the appointment of a king" (1 Samuel 11:14-15; 2 Samuel 5:1-3). A crown that must be conferred can be made conditional, and in v. 4 it is. The petition is one root against another: lighten (qâlal) the service (ʻăbôdâh) and we will serve (ʻâbad) you. Cambridge locates the grievance in the forced labor of 1 Kings 5:13-14, a passage Chronicles never reproduces; Pulpit adds the taxation of 1 Kings 4. Geneva stands alone against them all, reading the request itself as murmuring "without cause" and suggesting "that God hardened their hearts." Benson had already reached for the same explanation at the level of Solomon: "It is probable, when Solomon had declined from God, that God left him to himself to act thus impoliticly." Both of those are theological verdicts, not observations from the text, and the text makes neither.
The narrative's spine is a single verb used twice. וַיִּוָּעַ֞ץ (Nifal of yâʻats) convenes the elders in v. 6 and the boys in v. 8, and between the two stands וַֽיַּעֲזֹ֛ב, ʻâzab, the verb Scripture uses for forsaking a covenant. Rehoboam did not weigh the elders and decline them; he let them go. The elders' counsel in v. 7 is one adjective, ṭôwb, spent twice. JFB translates it into policy: "If thou wilt make some reasonable concessions, redress their grievances, and restore their abridged liberties, thou wilt secure their strong and lasting attachment to thy person and government." Henry reduces it further, that good words "cost only a little self-denial, yet they purchase great things." But Cambridge and Ellicott both show that the Chronicler has already blunted the counsel: Kings reads "If thou wilt be a servant unto this people, and wilt serve them" (BSB at 1 Kings 12:7: "If you will be a servant to these people and serve them this day"), and Cambridge's judgment is that "The words which were too blunt for Rehoboam were also too blunt for the Chronicler." So the sharpest thing the elders ever said survives only in the parallel. Note too that Ellicott's râtsâh is a word of gracious reception, the verb of Genesis 33:10, not of crowd-pleasing. Against this, the boys. The narrator calls them הַיְלָדִים֙, children, though Pulpit reasonably asks how men of Rehoboam's own age can be young, and floats the Speaker's Commentary conjecture that 41 should be read as 21 at 1 Kings 14:21 and 2 Chronicles 12:13. Their speech is built on two rare words: qôṭen, a pettiness, which Ellicott insists simply means the little finger, and ʻâbâh, to be thick, which the Verifier finds in only three verses. Pulpit's verdict is unimprovable: "Language perhaps never spoke more clearly what was in man. And it spoke in this case the mad infatuation of insolent temerity itself." The threat then reaches for yâçar, the verb of a father correcting a child, and for two instruments, shôwṭ and ʻaqrâb. Cambridge reports that a whip "was among the insignia of an Egyptian (and perhaps also of an Israelite) king," and refuses to decide whether the scorpions are proverbial or a named lash "the lash of which was provided with thorns or hooks." Henry names the mechanism of the whole movement without mentioning a single Hebrew word: "No more needs to be done to ruin men, than to leave them to their own pride and passion."
The people keep the appointment exactly, returning on the third day at the king's own word, and Pulpit notices what Scripture withholds: not one line about those three days of suspense. Then v. 13 answers them קָשָׁ֑ה, and the irony is lexical. The grievance in v. 4 was that Solomon made hard (hiqšāh) the yoke; the king's reply is now that same root turned into his manner. Ellicott renders it "Hardly." Pulpit sets him under his father's proverb, an "ill pupil indeed of him who wrote and taught, 'A soft answer tumeth away wrath' ( Proverbs 15:1 )," and Cambridge asks the dynastic question straight: "Could the good fortune of the House of David fail at this third crisis?" Then v. 15, and the ground moves. The king "did not hear," shâmaʻ, the verb of heeding, though he had quoted the petition back verbatim in v. 9. The reason given is נְסִבָּה֙, a turning, a word Ellicott shows to be isolated in the Old Testament along with its counterpart in Kings. It came mê·‘im hā·’ĕlōhîm, from with God, so that YHWH might cause to stand a word spoken by the hand of Ahijah, a prophecy Chronicles never records and only names at 2 Chronicles 9:29. Here the commentators divide, and we will not pretend otherwise. JFB holds both ends at once: the actors "each acted as free agents, obeying their own will and passions," while God "permitted the revolt of the northern tribes" and "intended it as a punishment of the house of David for Solomon's apostasy." Geneva presses toward determination: God's will "overrides all so that nothing can be done but according to the same," and yet man's will "works by itself, so that he cannot use the excuse that his deed was of God's ordinance." Pulpit presses the other way, denying that the cause is from God "in this sense that he has made it, but in the sense that he has pronounced it, through knowing it with an absolute knowledge." Keil and Delitzsch decline the ground altogether, referring the reader to their work on 1 Kings 12 where they treat "the deeper and more latent causes of this event, so important in its consequences." The Hebrew preposition will bear all three readings, and no philology here decides between them. One textual note belongs to this movement: 1 Kings 12:15 says the turning was "from the LORD," and Chronicles writes "from God" and then names YHWH in the purpose clause. The Chronicler does not weaken the claim; he distributes it.
⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested, not a sourced finding. The chapter is usually read as a lesson in management, and the commentators encourage it: Henry and Benson both say gentleness would have kept the kingdom. That is true and it is not the point. Read the vocabulary instead. Every party in this story speaks the language of weight, and none of them speaks the language of right. The people do not say Solomon's levy was unjust; they ask for less of it. The elders do not tell the king to repent; they tell him to be pleasant. The boys do not defend the levy; they promise more of it. Nobody in fifteen verses asks what the LORD requires of a king, and the one word that finally decides the outcome was spoken years before by a prophet none of them consults and the Chronicler never quotes. That, on this reading, is the actual indictment: not that Rehoboam chose badly between two councils, but that a nation and a court and a king conducted the most consequential negotiation in the history of the united kingdom entirely in the currency of burden, and God's word arrived from outside the room. When v. 15 says the turning was from with God, it is not solving a puzzle about freedom and decree. It is telling us where the decisive speech came from, and it was not from Shechem. The sentence set apart below is the tool's own line and not a verse of Scripture.
Not a verse: they argued about the weight of the yoke, and never once about whose neck it was.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
This unit is not merely parallel to 1 Kings 12:1-15, it is in long stretches the same Hebrew. Barnes disposes of every verse with one sentence, that "The narrative of Kings (marginal reference) is repeated with only slight verbal differences." JFB says the chapter "is, with a few verbal alterations, the same as in 1Ki 12:1-19." Keil and Delitzsch will not expound it at all, referring the reader to 1 Kings 12 because the event is narrated "except in so far as a few unessential differences in form are concerned, exactly as we have it" there. Ellicott, verse by verse, catalogues the differences that do exist: a locative ending in v. 1, a singular verb for a plural subject in vv. 3, 5 and 12, a softened counsel in v. 7, an added royal title in v. 13. In BSB the English of 2 Chronicles 10:11 and 1 Kings 12:11 is word for word identical, as is 10:14 against 12:14 (both verified against the text). The Verifier's shared lexemes are ordinary words, so the verbal tier here does not rest on rarity; it rests on whole-verse identity, which is a stronger and more checkable thing.
1 Kings 12:4 · 1 Kings 12:10 · 1 Kings 12:11 · 1 Kings 12:14
basis: Verifier shared Hebrew lexemes at 1 Kings 12:10 (H5923 ʻôl, 34 vv; H7043 qâlal, 79 vv; H3206 yeled, 76 vv), 12:11 (H3515 kâbêd, 40 vv; H5923 ʻôl), 12:14 (H5923 ʻôl; H3206 yeled; H6098 ʻêtsâh, 85 vv) and 12:4 (H7185 qâshâh, 28 vv; H3515 kâbêd; H7186 qâsheh, 36 vv). None of these lexemes is rare, so the verbal tier rests instead on whole-verse identity: BSB renders 2 Chronicles 10:11 and 10:14 word for word as 1 Kings 12:11 and 12:14, and Barnes, JFB and K&D all record the two accounts as one text with minor formal variation.
Verse 15 grounds the schism in a prophecy the Chronicler never narrates. Cambridge says so plainly, that the Ahijah incident "is not narrated in Chron., being assumed to be known," sending the reader to 1 Kings 11:29-39, where Ahijah tears a new cloak into twelve pieces and gives Jeroboam ten. Ellicott notes that the Chronicler "does not deviate from the text of Kings here, although he has not mentioned Ahijah's prophecy to Jeroboam before," and points to 2 Chronicles 9:29, which cites "the Prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite" among the Chronicler's sources, along with visions of Iddo "concerning Jeroboam son of Nebat" (verified). One substitution is worth recording: 1 Kings 12:15 says the turning was "from the LORD," while 2 Chronicles 10:15 says "from God" and then names YHWH in the purpose clause. Both verses are otherwise saying the same thing, and the Chronicler's version holds both divine names in one sentence. The same divine-doing formula surfaces again a few verses later at 1 Kings 12:24, where the LORD stops the war with "for this is My doing" (verified).
1 Kings 11:29 · 1 Kings 11:31 · 1 Kings 12:15 · 1 Kings 12:24 · 2 Chronicles 9:29
basis: Verifier shared Hebrew lexemes: 1 Kings 12:15 (H5028 Nᵉbâṭ, 25 vv; H3379 Yârobʻâm, 95 vv), 1 Kings 11:29 (H3379 Yârobʻâm), 2 Chronicles 9:29 (H8010 Shᵉlômôh, 263 vv; H5028 Nᵉbâṭ; H3379 Yârobʻâm). H5028 is comparatively narrow (25 vv), and the link is reinforced by near-identity of the whole clause with 1 Kings 12:15, verified in BSB. 1 Kings 12:24 is adduced for the divine-doing formula only, with no shared-lexeme basis computed for it.
The boast of v. 10 turns on עָבָ֖ה (ʻâbâh, H5666, to be dense), and the Verifier finds this verb in only three verses of the Old Testament. One of the other two is Deuteronomy 32:15, where the Song of Moses says of Jeshurun that he grew thick and then "abandoned the God who made him and scorned the Rock of his salvation" (BSB, verified). ⚙ The connection is a shared rare word inside a shared idea, that becoming thick in Hebrew is rarely a compliment: it is the physical vocabulary of a gorged and kicking prosperity. Rehoboam intends the word as a claim of strength over his father. Moses had already used it of a nation whose strength was its ruin. No commentator in the brief draws this line, and the badge below therefore records the lexical basis rather than a source.
Deuteronomy 32:15
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H5666 ʻâbâh, found in only 3 verses of the Old Testament. The rarity would license a verbal tier and we deliberately under-claim: no quotation or citation runs in either direction, the two passages predicate the word of different subjects, and the thematic reading of the link is the tool's own. In this unit the verbal tier is kept for demonstrable textual identity, as in the 1 Kings 12 parallel.
בָּֽעֲקְרַבִּֽים (ʻaqrâb, H6137) is a rare noun, six verses in all, and the Verifier puts two of them beside this one. Deuteronomy 8:15 remembers "the vast and terrifying wilderness with its venomous snakes and scorpions" through which the LORD led Israel (BSB, verified). Ezekiel 2:6 tells the prophet not to fear "though briers and thorns surround you, and you dwell among scorpions," naming Israel itself as the scorpion-country (verified). Cambridge is careful about what the word means in Rehoboam's mouth: "most probably proverbial and metaphorical," though some authorities take it for a particular hooked scourge. ⚙ Either way the king has reached for a word that Scripture otherwise attaches to wilderness and to rebellion, and the northern tribes are about to become both.
Deuteronomy 8:15 · Ezekiel 2:6
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H6137 ʻaqrâb, a rare word occurring in 6 verses, matched at Deuteronomy 8:15 and Ezekiel 2:6. The rarity would justify a verbal tier and we deliberately under-claim: no quotation or citation is involved, and the word does different work in each passage (a wilderness hazard, a figure for a rebellious house, a royal threat). The reading of the link is the tool's own; only the lexeme and its frequency are sourced.
The whips of vv. 11 and 14 are שׁוֹטִ֔ים (shôwṭ, H7752), a noun the Verifier finds in ten verses. Its other occurrences are almost all about judgment from above rather than discipline from a throne: Isaiah 28:18 warns that "When the overwhelming scourge passes through, you will be trampled by it"; Job 5:21 promises the blessed man he "will be hidden from the scourge of the tongue"; Job 9:23 has "When the scourge brings sudden death, He mocks the despair of the innocent" (all three verified in BSB). Cambridge adds a concrete possibility from the material record, that a whip or flail "was among the insignia of an Egyptian (and perhaps also of an Israelite) king." ⚙ We tier this structural rather than verbal deliberately: the lexeme is uncommon but the sense shifts, from an instrument God swings over nations to an instrument a king promises his own people, and that shift is the point rather than the link.
Isaiah 28:18 · Job 5:21 · Job 9:23
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H7752 shôwṭ (in 10 vv) at Isaiah 28:18, Job 5:21 and Job 9:23. A real verbal link at the level of vocabulary, deliberately tiered structural because the referent changes hands between the passages and no quotation or citation is involved.
Pulpit makes this connection himself at v. 4: after listing the forced labor and taxation behind the grievance, he writes that "The refreshing New Testament contrast to all this ( Matthew 11:28-30 ) will occur to every memory." The verified text is the contrast: "Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For My yoke is easy and My burden is light" (Matthew 11:29-30). Set that against what the elders actually said in the older text, 1 Kings 12:7: "If you will be a servant to these people and serve them this day" (verified), a sentence Cambridge says was "too blunt" for both Rehoboam and the Chronicler. ⚙ Jesus answers both halves. He is the king who takes the servant's place, as Mark 10:43-45 and Luke 22:26-27 put it, and He is the one who offers a light yoke instead of adding to a heavy one. This is a cross-Testament link, Greek against Hebrew, so no shared Strong's number is possible and none is claimed.
Matthew 11:28-30 · 1 Kings 12:7 · Mark 10:43-45 · Luke 22:26-27
basis: Cross-Testament, Greek against Hebrew, so shared Strong's lexemes are impossible by definition and no verbal claim is made. The recorded basis is the shared yoke-and-burden motif plus an explicit source citation: Pulpit cross-references Matthew 11:28-30 at 2 Chronicles 10:4, and the elders' counsel in the parallel 1 Kings 12:7 uses the servant-king language Mark 10:43-45 and Luke 22:26-27 take up. All quoted verses verified against BSB.
⚙ When Israel first asked for a king, Samuel described what a king would do in one repeated verb, he will take: sons, daughters, fields, flocks, "and you yourselves will become his slaves," and "When that day comes, you will beg for relief from the king you have chosen, but the LORD will not answer you on that day" (1 Samuel 8:17-18, verified in BSB). At Shechem the nation is doing precisely that begging, and receives precisely that non-answer, from the throne rather than from heaven. The reading is attractive and we are flagging it rather than asserting it: the Verifier returned no shared-lexeme basis for this pair, no commentator in the brief draws the line, and 1 Samuel 8 is talking about kingship as such where 2 Chronicles 10 is talking about one king's levy. Treat it as a proposal to be checked, not a finding.
1 Samuel 8:11 · 1 Samuel 8:17 · 1 Samuel 8:18
basis: No Verifier basis: this pair does not appear among the computed thread candidates for the unit, and no shared Strong's lexeme has been established. The link is thematic and is the tool's own proposal; the only verified element is the BSB text of 1 Samuel 8:11, 17-18. Flagged for a reader to test.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
The whole negotiation at Shechem is conducted in one image, עֹ֣ל, the yoke, and in two Hifil verbs that are exact opposites: hā·qêl, lighten (vv. 4, 9, 10), and ’ō·sîp̄, add (vv. 11, 14). Pulpit himself sets the passage against Matthew 11:28-30, calling it "The refreshing New Testament contrast to all this," and the verified words are the contrast down to the vocabulary: "For My yoke is easy and My burden is light." Deeper than the yoke is the sentence Chronicles softened away. Ellicott and Cambridge both show that 1 Kings 12:7 had the elders tell the king to become a servant to this people and serve them, and Cambridge judges that the words "which were too blunt for Rehoboam were also too blunt for the Chronicler." The advice the son of David would not take is the advice the Son of David embodies: "whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant... For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many" (Mark 10:43, 45, verified), and "I am among you as one who serves" (Luke 22:27, verified). Rehoboam was offered a throne on the condition that he serve, and lost ten tribes refusing. Christ takes the servant's place and receives an unbreakable kingdom. This reading of Matthew 11 against the yoke of Rehoboam is the ancient and widely-held one, and Pulpit records it here.
Matthew 11:28-30 · 1 Kings 12:7 · Mark 10:43-45 · Luke 22:25-27
What happens in this chapter is the tearing that Ahijah acted out with a new cloak cut into twelve pieces (1 Kings 11:29-31, verified), and it does not heal in the Old Testament. The prophets answer it with a promise about a single king: "I will make them one nation in the land, on the mountains of Israel, and one king will rule over all of them. Then they will no longer be two nations and will never again be divided into two kingdoms," and "My servant David will be king over them, and there will be one shepherd for all of them" (Ezekiel 37:22, 24, verified). ⚙ Cambridge asks at v. 13 whether "the good fortune of the House of David" could fail at this third crisis, and the answer the narrative gives is yes. The answer the canon gives is that the house of David is restored not in Rehoboam's line as a political fact but in one Son who is both David's servant and Israel's one shepherd. The typology of a divided kingdom reunited under the one Davidic shepherd is ancient and widely held in Christian reading; what this unit adds is the diagnosis, that the division began where a Davidic king refused to serve.
Ezekiel 37:22 · Ezekiel 37:24 · 1 Kings 11:29 · 1 Kings 11:31
Verse 15 puts two things in one sentence without reconciling them: the king "did not listen," and the turning "was from with God" so that His word might stand. JFB states both ends: the actors "each acted as free agents, obeying their own will and passions," and yet God "permitted the revolt of the northern tribes" and "intended it as a punishment of the house of David for Solomon's apostasy," which he calls an instance "of divine predictions, uttered long before, being accomplished by the operation of human passions, and in the natural course of events." Geneva presses the sovereignty harder and still refuses the excuse; Pulpit refuses the causal reading altogether. ⚙ The New Testament states the same double fact at its sharpest point: "He was delivered up by God's set plan and foreknowledge, and you, by the hands of the lawless, put Him to death by nailing Him to the cross" (Acts 2:23, verified), and of Herod, Pilate and the rest, "They carried out what Your hand and will had decided beforehand would happen" (Acts 4:28, verified). Note that Chronicles uses the same idiom of agency, bə·yaḏ, by the hand of Ahijah, that Acts 2:23 uses of lawless hands. We do not offer this as a solution to v. 15; the commentators divide precisely because there is no solution in the Hebrew. We offer it as the canon's own habit of asserting both, which is ancient and widely held, and which reaches its limit case at the cross.
Acts 2:23 · Acts 4:27-28 · 1 Kings 12:15
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text. This unit runs parallel to 1 Kings 12:1-15, and three of our commentators treat that as reason not to comment: Barnes gives one sentence for the whole chapter, JFB refers the reader to his notes on 1 Kings 12, and Keil and Delitzsch expound nothing here, saying they have discussed "the deeper and more latent causes of this event" in their work on Kings. Gill's entry for every verse of this unit reads only "See Introduction to Chapter 9," so Gill is not quoted at all; Poole has text on v. 3 only and is marked "No text from Poole on this verse" elsewhere. The real exegetical weight in the brief is carried by Ellicott, Cambridge and Pulpit.
Two textual forks are live. At v. 14 the Berean interlinear parses אַכְבִּיד֙ as a Hifil imperfect first person singular ("I will make heavy") with no word for "my father" in that clause, while BSB renders "Whereas my father made your yoke heavy" with 1 Kings 12:14; Ellicott judges the first person reading an error arising from a fusion of two words, and notes that all the versions support the text he prefers. Both facts are reported above and neither is suppressed. At v. 2 the difference between "Jeroboam returned out of Egypt" and Kings' "Jeroboam dwelt in Egypt" is, on Cambridge's account, one consonant, and on Ellicott's, a matter of pointing only.
Word order. The interlinear supplied in the brief lists words in English-gloss order, not Hebrew order, at several points (v. 1, v. 5, v. 10, v. 12, v. 15 among them). The literal renderings above are built from the Hebrew clause order, while the note keys follow the interlinear indices as required, so a note index will not always fall where the word sits in the literal line.
Uncertain. Whether the scorpions of vv. 11 and 14 name a specific hooked scourge or are proverbial, Cambridge leaves open and so do we. Whether the "old men" of v. 6 were an office or simply Solomon's contemporaries, Pulpit leaves open. Whether Rehoboam was forty-one or twenty-one rests on a conjectural emendation Pulpit takes from the Speaker's Commentary, not on a manuscript. The brief's Pulpit text at v. 13 reads "tumeth" for "turneth" in its quotation of Proverbs 15:1, evidently a defect of the printed or scanned source, and is quoted unaltered.
Left unsettled on purpose. The divine causation of v. 15 divides our own sources: Geneva says God's will "overrides all," JFB holds free agency and divine intention together, Pulpit denies that God made the cause and says only that He pronounced what He foreknew, Benson and Geneva both reach for a hardening, and K&D decline the question here. The Hebrew mê·‘im hā·’ĕlōhîm with the hapax nᵉçibbâh will bear all of these. We have recorded the positions and their owners and have not chosen among them.
Provenance of our own work. Every Scripture quotation from outside this pericope above has been checked against data/raw/bsb.txt: 1 Kings 11:29-31, 1 Kings 12:4, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 24, 2 Chronicles 9:29, 2 Chronicles 13:7, Deuteronomy 8:15, Deuteronomy 32:15, Proverbs 15:1, 1 Samuel 8:11, 17-18, Job 5:21, Job 9:23, Isaiah 28:18, Ezekiel 2:6, Ezekiel 37:22, 24, Matthew 11:28-30, Mark 10:42-45, Luke 22:25-27, Acts 2:23, Acts 4:27-28. Thread bases are the Verifier's computed shared lexemes except where the badge says otherwise; the 1 Samuel 8 thread has no computed basis and is flagged accordingly. Passages marked ⚙ are the tool's own fallible synthesis and carry no more authority than the argument they show.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)