He made the veil of blue, purple, and crimson yarn and fine linen, with cherubim woven into it.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·ya·‘aś ’eṯ- hap·pā·rō·ḵeṯ tə·ḵê·leṯ wə·’ar·gā·mān wə·ḵar·mîl ū·ḇūṣ kə·rū·ḇîm way·ya·‘al ‘ā·lāw
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Veil and Pillars
2 Chronicles 3:14–17 — The Veil and Pillars. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
He made the veil of blue, purple, and crimson yarn and fine linen, with cherubim woven into it.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·ya·‘aś ’eṯ- hap·pā·rō·ḵeṯ tə·ḵê·leṯ wə·’ar·gā·mān wə·ḵar·mîl ū·ḇūṣ kə·rū·ḇîm way·ya·‘al ‘ā·lāw
In front of the temple he made two pillars, which together were thirty-five cubits high, each with a capital on top measuring five cubits.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
lip̄·nê hab·ba·yiṯ way·ya·‘aś šə·na·yim ‘am·mū·ḏîm šə·lō·šîm wə·ḥā·mêš ’am·mō·wṯ ’ō·reḵ wə·haṣ·ṣe·p̄eṯ ’ă·šer- ‘al- rō·šōw ḥā·mêš ’am·mō·wṯ
He made interwoven chains and put them on top of the pillars. He made a hundred pomegranates and fastened them into the chainwork.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·ya·‘aś bad·də·ḇîr šar·šə·rō·wṯ way·yit·tên ‘al- rōš hā·‘am·mu·ḏîm way·ya·‘aś mê·’āh rim·mō·w·nîm way·yit·tên baš·šar·šə·rō·wṯ
Then he set up the pillars in front of the temple, one on the south and one on the north. The pillar on the south he named Jachin, and the pillar on the north he named Boaz.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·yā·qem ’eṯ- hā·‘am·mū·ḏîm ‘al- pə·nê ha·hê·ḵāl ’e·ḥāḏ mî·yā·mîn wə·’e·ḥāḏ mê·haś·śə·mō·wl hay·mī·nī way·yiq·rā šêm- yā·ḵîn haś·śə·mā·lî wə·šêm bō·‘az
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
The Chronicler's temple gets a פָּרֹכֶת, and the parallel account does not. That is the first fact, and nearly every commentator printed here says so: Ellicott ("is not mentioned in the existing text of 1Kings 6:21"), Barnes ("an important addition to the description in Kings"), Keil and Delitzsch, Cambridge and Pulpit all mark the absence. They divide on what it means. Cambridge suspects literary borrowing: "The vail here described seems to have been borrowed by the Chronicler from the account of the tabernacle given in Exodus", noting that 1 Kings 6:31 to 6:32 gives olive wood doors with carved cherubim instead. Pulpit finds the silence of 1 Kings the stranger thing, since the veil is "a feature of which so much was always made", and lists Matthew 27:51, Mark 15:38, Luke 23:45, Hebrews 6:19 and Hebrews 9:3. ⚙ Our own observation is lexical and cuts slightly against Cambridge: the Chronicler's crimson is karmîyl (H3758), a word the Verifier finds in only 3 verses and whose nearest matches are his own 2 Chronicles 2:7 and 2:14, not Exodus. If he borrowed the object, he did not copy the wording.
Then the text gives a number that the rest of Scripture contradicts. Ellicott sets out the evidence without flinching: 1 Kings 7:15, 2 Kings 25:17 and Jeremiah 52:21 say eighteen cubits, "and no doubt correctly"; the LXX and Vulgate here say thirty-five, the Syriac and Arabic eighteen. Cambridge prints the whole tangle as a table and adds that the Hebrew here says length where Jeremiah says height. From there the commentators split into two camps. The harmonizers add the columns together: JFB ("The united height is here given"), Geneva ("Every one was eighteen cubits long, but the half cubit could not be seen"), Poole ("both of them"). The text critics call it an error: Keil and Delitzsch, "The number thirty-five has arisen by confounding יח equals 18 with לה equals 35"; Barnes reports the view without endorsing it, "Some suppose that there has been a corruption of the number in the present passage"; Pulpit weighs a third option, that thirty-five is the distance between the two pillars, then concludes "it is perhaps likelier that we have here simply a clerical error". ⚙ We do not adjudicate, and we notice what the disagreement costs no one: the number is wrong or oddly reckoned, and the two pillars still stand in every witness.
Verse 16 opens with two Hebrew words that no one can construe. Barnes: "This passage is probably corrupt." Keil and Delitzsch: "in (on) the most holy place, has no meaning", and they take Bertheau's rabîd, a neck ring, reconstructing the capital from 1 Kings 7:17 to 7:20 as a lower bulge netted with chainwork and set with two rows of pomegranates. Cambridge calls the words a gloss from 1 Kings 6:21. Ellicott defends the consonants with a single change of pointing, kad for bad, and adds that the LXX simply transliterated what it could not parse: "He made serserôth in the dabir." ⚙ The words survive in the text precisely because nobody could improve them, and the hundred pomegranates are themselves a partial count, since Ellicott, Poole, Geneva and Pulpit all reckon two hundred to a pillar from 1 Kings 7:20 and 2 Chronicles 4:13. Then, after all the measuring, the chapter's only speech: two names. Cambridge gives the margin, Jachin "he shall establish" and Boaz perhaps "In it is strength", and then says the honest thing, "The meaning of Boaz is quite uncertain". Pulpit is bolder, reading in them "the safety and sure strength that belong to those who wait on" God, and Benson glosses them "establishment and strength". Cambridge's structural point is the strongest one available: "The fact that names were given them ( 2 Chronicles 3:17 ) suggests that they were symbols, perhaps of the presence of Jehovah."
⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested by Scripture and not to be trusted above it. Count the finite verbs in these four verses: there are nine, and eight of them are work (he made, he made, he brought up, he made, he gave, he made, he gave, he caused to stand). The ninth is he called, and all it produces is two names. What the Chronicler puts at the front of the house and what he puts at the back of the room are the same argument in two directions. At the back, a woven partition with guardian figures in it: the shrine is entered by no one who reads this book. At the front, two columns that hold nothing up, named for establishing and for strength, standing where every worshipper must pass them. The house is therefore honest twice over. It tells you that you cannot come in, and it tells you, by two names, that the arrangement will not fall down. Note what is missing: in these four verses God neither speaks nor is spoken to. The only voice is Solomon's, naming pillars. That is not a criticism of the temple; it is the shape of the dispensation Benson calls dark, in which the worshippers are kept at a distance and the distance itself is upholstered in blue and purple and carmine. ⚙ We take the textual mess as part of the witness rather than an embarrassment to be tidied. A number that will not reconcile with 1 Kings, two words that no commentator can construe, and a pillar name that Cambridge admits is simply unknown: the record of this house has been copied by tired hands, and the two things nobody disputes are the curtain and the pillars. The line printed beside this reading is ours, not Scripture.
The house says both things at once: you may not come in, and this will not fall down.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
Exodus 26:31 reads, "Make a veil of blue, purple, and scarlet yarn, and finely spun linen, with cherubim skillfully worked into it", and 26:33 states its office: "So the veil will separate the Holy Place from the Most Holy Place." Every commentator printed in this unit sends the reader there: Ellicott ("See Exodus 26:31, which gives an identical description of the vail of the tabernacle"), Barnes, Poole, Geneva, Cambridge, Pulpit and Keil and Delitzsch, who says it "was made of the same materials and colours as the veil on the tabernacle". Cambridge goes further and suspects the Chronicler took the veil from Exodus because 1 Kings has doors there instead. ⚙ We stop short of a verbal claim: no Verifier basis was computed for this pair, and the Chronicler's own crimson word (karmîyl, 3 verses) is not the tabernacle's. The tent and the temple divide the same space in the same colors; the sentences are not the same sentence.
Exodus 26:31 · Exodus 26:33
basis: No Verifier lexeme basis exists for this pair: Exodus 26:31 is not in the candidate list, so no shared Strong's frequency can be cited and no verbal tier is claimed. The recorded basis is documentary and unanimous among the sourced voices (Ellicott, Barnes, Poole, Geneva, Cambridge, Pulpit, Keil and Delitzsch all cite Exodus 26:31 here), plus the negative lexical fact the Verifier does supply: karmîyl H3758 (in 3 verses) has its nearest matches at 2 Chronicles 2:7 and 2:14, not in Exodus.
שַׁרְשְׁרָה (sharshᵉrâh, H8333) occurs in only five verses of the Hebrew Bible, and the Verifier names four of them as candidates for this unit, which means this verse is the fifth and the whole vocabulary of the word is in view. Two of the five are priestly vestment: "and two chains of pure gold, made of braided cord work" (Exodus 28:14), "For the breastpiece they made braided chains like cords of pure gold" (Exodus 39:15). One is earlier in this same chapter, the main room "decorated with palm trees and chains" (2 Chronicles 3:5), which is exactly the room Ellicott appeals to when he defends reading "chainwork as in the chancel". One is the parallel capital: "a network of lattice, with wreaths of chainwork, seven for each capital" (1 Kings 7:17). ⚙ The observation is simply that the word is priestly before it is architectural. What hung on the high priest's chest now hangs on the head of a column standing outside, in public, where the priest's breastpiece never goes.
Exodus 28:14 · Exodus 39:15 · 2 Chronicles 3:5 · 1 Kings 7:17
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H8333 sharshᵉrâh, frequency "in 5 vv", a rare lexeme. The Verifier lists Exodus 28:14, Exodus 39:15, 2 Chronicles 3:5 and 1 Kings 7:17 as candidates carrying it; with 2 Chronicles 3:16 that accounts for all five occurrences. All refs are Hebrew, so a verbal tier is permissible. No quotation is claimed, only shared rare vocabulary.
1 Kings 7:21 is the same act in different words: "Thus he set up the pillars at the portico of the temple. The pillar to the south he named Jachin, and the pillar to the north he named Boaz." Four verses earlier that account measures them: "each eighteen cubits high and twelve cubits in circumference" (1 Kings 7:15). Ellicott, Barnes, Poole, Cambridge, Pulpit and Keil and Delitzsch all read our verse against that one, and all six register the collision between eighteen and thirty-five; Cambridge adds that 1 Kings gives the pillars as cast, hollow and crowned with bowl-shaped capitals, and that the Chronicler tells us none of this. ⚙ The link is the parallel narrative itself, not a quotation, and we decline a verbal tier: the Verifier's shared lexemes here are ʻammûwd (84 verses, far too common to carry weight) and sᵉmâʼlîy (9 verses).
1 Kings 7:21 · 1 Kings 7:15
basis: Verifier for 1 Kings 7:21: shared Hebrew lexemes H5982 ʻammûwd (in 84 vv) and H8042 sᵉmâʼlîy (in 9 vv). Both verses are Hebrew so a verbal tier would be formally available, but ʻammûwd is common and no shared rare lexeme is recorded, so the basis is the synoptic parallel plus moderate lexical overlap. 1 Kings 7:15 is added as the measurement the commentators (Ellicott, Barnes, Pulpit, Keil and Delitzsch, Geneva, Poole) all cite against 3:15; it is not itself in the Verifier candidate list.
The three fabrics of the curtain are not only sacred stock. The Verifier puts this verse next to a Persian throne room, "Hangings of white and blue linen were fastened with cords of fine white and purple material to silver rings on the marble pillars" (Esther 1:6), which happens to hang cloth on pillars too; next to Esther 8:15, which the Verifier lists with the same three lexemes; and next to Ezekiel 27:16, which shares the purple and the byssus. ⚙ The point is not a borrowing in either direction. It is that Israel's holiest partition is made of the most expensive things on the international market, and the Chronicler has already told us at 2 Chronicles 2:14 that the craftsman who could work them was hired out of Tyre.
Esther 1:6 · Esther 8:15 · Ezekiel 27:16 · 2 Chronicles 2:14
basis: Verifier: with Esther 1:6 and Esther 8:15, shared Hebrew lexemes H713 ʼargâmân (in 38 vv), H948 bûwts (in 8 vv) and H8504 tᵉkêleth (in 49 vv); with Ezekiel 27:16, H713 and H948; with 2 Chronicles 2:14 (top-ranked candidate, 0.51), H713, H948 and the rare H3758 karmîyl (in 3 vv). bûwts (8 vv) is the tightest of the common three. The shared material is a motif of costly imported cloth, not a quotation, so the tier is thematic and not verbal even though all refs are Hebrew.
Pulpit's note on this verse is the provenance for this link: he finds it remarkable that 1 Kings omits the veil, "though a feature of which so much was always made", and lists Matthew 27:51, Mark 15:38, Luke 23:45, Hebrews 6:19 and Hebrews 9:3. The Gospel report is flat and physical: "At that moment the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom" (Matthew 27:51). Hebrews 9:3 uses the partition as a simple fact of the building, "Behind the second curtain was a room called the Most Holy Place", and then Hebrews 10:19 to 10:20 turns it inside out: "since we have confidence to enter the Most Holy Place by the blood of Jesus, by the new and living way opened for us through the curtain of His body". Benson reads exactly this off our verse. ⚙ Note what the temple of 2 Chronicles 3 cannot say for itself: the veil here is being installed, and nothing in the Chronicler's report anticipates its removal.
Matthew 27:51 · Mark 15:38 · Hebrews 9:3 · Hebrews 10:19 · Hebrews 10:20
basis: Cross-Testament (Hebrew against Greek), so no shared Strong's number is possible and no verbal tier is claimed. The recorded basis is documentary: Pulpit, commenting on this very verse, lists Matthew 27:51, Mark 15:38, Luke 23:45, Hebrews 6:19 and Hebrews 9:3 as the places where the veil is made much of, and Benson reads Hebrews 10:19 directly off 2 Chronicles 3:14. The shared object is the temple partition, identified by the ancient commentators, not by lexical overlap.
⚙ Put these four verses beside the high priest's dress and the inventory matches item for item. The curtain is blue, purple, crimson and byssus; the robe's hem carries "pomegranates of blue, purple, and scarlet yarn all the way around the lower hem, with gold bells between them" (Exodus 28:33), repeated at Exodus 39:24 with the fine linen added. The pillar's capital carries chains, and the breastpiece carries "two chains of pure gold, made of braided cord work" (Exodus 28:14), in the same rare word sharshᵉrâh that verse 16 uses. So the two columns standing outdoors in front of the house are ornamented like the one man who may go behind the curtain inside it, and Keil and Delitzsch's reconstruction of the capital, a netted collar set with two rows of carved pomegranates, only sharpens the resemblance. ⚙ We claim no more than the match itself: it is our observation, not a commentator's.
Exodus 28:33 · Exodus 28:34 · Exodus 39:24 · Exodus 28:14
basis: Two grades of evidence, kept apart. For the chains the Verifier supplies a real lexeme basis: H8333 sharshᵉrâh (in 5 vv, rare) shared with Exodus 28:14. For the pomegranates and the color triad no Verifier basis was computed, since Exodus 28:33, 28:34 and 39:24 are not in the candidate list; the basis there is the shared motif as the BSB text of those verses states it, checked against data/raw/bsb.txt. Because half the basis is motif rather than computed lexeme overlap, the whole thread is tiered thematic and not verbal.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ Read forward, 3:14 is the installation of an obstacle. A woven wall with guardian figures worked into it says, in the only language architecture has, that the way in is shut. Benson says this of the very verse: the veil "denoted the darkness of that dispensation, and the distance at which the worshippers were kept", and then, "at the death of Christ this veil was rent; for through him we are brought nigh". Pulpit supplies the same connection as a list of texts. The Gospels report the event as demolition from above, torn "from top to bottom" (Matthew 27:51), and Hebrews names what replaced it, "the curtain of His body" (Hebrews 10:20). ⚙ We add only this caution: the Chronicler is not hinting. He is recording a purchase order. The reading is Christian hindsight, and it is honest hindsight only if it admits that the man who hung this cloth expected it to stay hung.
Matthew 27:51 · Hebrews 10:19 · Hebrews 10:20
⚙ The only words spoken in these four verses are two names, and both are about durability: Cambridge gives Jachin as "he shall establish" and Boaz as perhaps "In it is strength", Benson as "establishment and strength", Pulpit as "the safety and sure strength that belong to those who wait on" God. Jachin is a third person verb with no stated subject, so the name is a claim about someone who is not the pillar. Strong's glosses Boaz as "Boaz, the ancestor of David", which places a Davidic family name on the front of David's son's house. ⚙ The figural step is ours, and we mark it novel: in Revelation 3:12 the promise made to the overcomer is to be made "a pillar in the temple of My God", never again to leave it, with a name written on him. The bronze pillars carried names but held up nothing; the promise reverses the arrangement, giving the name to a person who is made to stand. We claim no verbal or authorial link, and we let Cambridge's warning stand: "The meaning of Boaz is quite uncertain."
1 Kings 7:21 · Revelation 3:12
Matthew Henry's comment on this chapter ends where the older commentators habitually end: "Beholding God, in Christ, his true Temple, more glorious than that of Solomon's, may we become a spiritual house, a habitation of God through the Spirit." That is the ordinary apostolic pattern, not a private reading: the church is "built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus Himself as the cornerstone" (Ephesians 2:20), and it is called "the pillar and foundation of the truth" (1 Timothy 3:15), which takes the very metaphor Solomon cast in bronze and applies it to an assembly. ⚙ Our own note is on the direction of travel. In 2 Chronicles 3 the craftsmanship is imported, the dyes are the world's most expensive, and the workmen come from Tyre (2 Chronicles 2:14); in the apostolic writings the material is people and the only imported thing is the Spirit.
Ephesians 2:20 · 1 Timothy 3:15
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
The thirty-five cubits. Our text says the pillars were thirty and five cubits, and three other passages say eighteen (1 Kings 7:15; 2 Kings 25:17; Jeremiah 52:21). Ellicott records the versional split (LXX and Vulgate thirty-five; Syriac and Arabic eighteen) and judges eighteen correct. Keil and Delitzsch, Barnes and Pulpit treat ours as a copying error; Pulpit notes that yod kheth (18) is easily displaced by lamed he (35). JFB, Geneva and Poole harmonize instead by adding the two columns. Cambridge observes that the Hebrew here says length where Jeremiah says height, which is what makes JFB's report of Poole's lying-in-the-mould suggestion possible. We have not emended the text and we do not choose between these; the reader should know the number is disputed in the sources themselves.
bad-debîr at 3:16. Two words in verse 16 are not construable as they stand. Barnes: "probably corrupt". Keil and Delitzsch: no meaning here, and they adopt Bertheau's rabîd (a ring or collar). Cambridge: a gloss carried in from 1 Kings 6:21. Ellicott: repoint bad to kad, "as in the chancel". Pulpit is reluctant to emend at all. BSB's "interwoven" is not a translation of the received Hebrew; our literal keeps the untranslated debîr visible so the reader can see the hole.
Interlinear row order. The Berean interlinear rows in this unit are aligned to the English rendering, not to Hebrew word order. Two places prove it from the text itself: at 3:14 the verse-ending marker stands on כְּרוּבִֽים׃ at row 7 although rows 8 and 9 follow, and at 3:15 it stands on חָמֵֽשׁ׃ at row 13 although row 14 follows. Our literal renderings follow the Hebrew sequence those markers imply and our note keys still use the interlinear indices, since qa.py validates against them.
The pomegranate count. Verse 16 says a hundred. All four commentators who compute a total read it against 1 Kings 7:20 and 2 Chronicles 4:13, and they do not agree. Poole and Geneva make it a hundred per row, two hundred in all. Ellicott makes it an upper and a lower row of a hundred on each pillar, four hundred in all, and Pulpit likewise says two hundred for each pillar. So the hundred in our verse is certainly partial and the total is disputed; we report the disagreement rather than resolve it.
Sources. Matthew Henry's entry in this unit is a single block on 2 Chronicles 3:1 to 3:17 and JFB's is a single block on 3:14 to 3:17, so neither is verse-specific; both are labeled by the verse the excerpt was filed under. Poole has no note at all on 3:17. Keil and Delitzsch's detailed reconstruction of the capital is built from 1 Kings 7:17 to 7:20 and 2 Chronicles 4:12 to 4:13, not from this verse, and their Bertheau emendation is a conjecture they themselves introduce as one. Ellicott quotes the critic Reuss in order to reject him, so the words "almost unintelligible" in that excerpt are Reuss's judgment, not Ellicott's.
What is machine work. Every paragraph or clause marked ⚙ is this tool's fallible synthesis: the karmîyl frequency argument against a literary borrowing from Exodus, the reading of the four verses as one double statement (no entry, sure standing), the priestly-to-public observation about sharshᵉrâh, the match between the priest's hem and the pillar's head, and the Revelation 3:12 pillar figure, which is marked novel. The cross-reference bases are Verifier lexeme overlaps with frequencies, which are evidence of shared vocabulary and never of quotation. No Scripture and no commentator's words in this unit were composed by the machine; the commentary excerpts were copied from the sourced text by code.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)