The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

2 Kings18:13–16

Sennacherib Invades Judah

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

2 Kings 18:13–16 — Sennacherib Invades Judah. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

13

In the fourteenth year of Hezekiah’s reign, Sennacherib king of Assyria attacked and captured all the fortified cities of Judah.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ū·ḇə·’ar·ba‘ ‘eś·rêh šā·nāh ḥiz·qî·yāh lam·me·leḵ san·ḥê·rîḇ me·leḵ- ’aš·šūr ‘ā·lāh ‘al way·yiṯ·pə·śêm kāl- hab·bə·ṣu·rō·wṯ ‘ā·rê yə·hū·ḏāh

Word by word15 · parsed
וּבְאַרְבַּע֩ū·ḇə·’ar·ba‘In the fourteenthH702
√ ʼarbaʻ — fourConjunctive waw, Preposition-bNumberfeminine singular
ʼarbaʻ: four The unit's most contested datum sits in its first word. Ellicott, Barnes and Pulpit all note that Sennacherib's own annals fix the Judean campaign at 701 B.C., roughly twenty years after Samaria fell, while this synchronism with 2 Kings 18:10 leaves only eight. The Fallible Synthetic Study Bible records the tension rather than resolving it: the number stands in the Hebrew text, and the Assyrian records stand too.
עֶשְׂרֵ֨ה‘eś·rêh. . .H6240
√ ʻâsâr — ten (only in combination), iNumberfeminine singular
שָׁנָ֜הšā·nāhyearH8141
√ shâneh — a year (as a revolution of time)Nounfeminine singular
חִזְקִיָּ֗הḥiz·qî·yāhof Hezekiah’sH2396
√ Chizqîyâh — Chizkijah, a king of Judah, also the name of two other IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
לַמֶּ֣לֶךְlam·me·leḵreignH4428
√ melek — a kingPreposition-l, ArticleNounmasculine singular
סַנְחֵרִ֤יבsan·ḥê·rîḇSennacheribH5576
√ Çanchêrîyb — Sancherib, an Assyrian kingNounpropermasculine singular
מֶֽלֶךְ־me·leḵ-kingH4428
√ melek — a kingNounmasculine singular construct
אַשּׁוּר֙’aš·šūrof AssyriaH804
√ ʼAshshûwr — Ashshur, the second son of ShemNounproperfeminine singular
עָלָ֞ה‘ā·lāhattackedH5927
√ ʻâlâh — to ascend, intransitively (be high) or actively (mount)VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
ʻâlâh: to ascend, go up The verb of ascent used for worshippers going up to the house of the LORD is here used of an invader. Judah's own idiom of pilgrimage is turned into the idiom of siege, and what comes up to Jerusalem in this chapter is Asshur rather than Israel.
עַ֣ל‘al. . .H5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
וַֽיִּתְפְּשֵֽׂם׃way·yiṯ·pə·śêmand capturedH8610
√ tâphas — to manipulate, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singularthird person masculine plural
tâphas: to lay hold of, seize A hand-verb: to grasp, to handle (it is used of handling a harp, a sword, a bow). The narrator does not say Sennacherib besieged or destroyed; he says he took the cities in hand. Pulpit gives Sennacherib's own count from the Eponym Canon, forty-six strong cities “I besieged, I captured.”
כָּל־kāl-allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
kôl: the whole Read absolutely, this “all” contradicts 2 Kings 18:17 and 2 Kings 19:8 within the same narrative. K&D, Poole, Benson and JFB independently read it as the ordinary Hebrew hyperbole of totality.
הַבְּצֻר֖וֹתhab·bə·ṣu·rō·wṯthe fortifiedH1219
√ bâtsar — to gather grapesArticleAdjectivefeminine plural
bâtsar: to make inaccessible, fortify Cambridge explains the strategy the word implies: the fortified cities “were subjugated first, that there might be no chance of help from them if it became necessary to assault the capital.” Every place of refuge is taken before the capital is approached, so that Jerusalem stands with nothing between it and Asshur except the LORD.
עָרֵ֧י‘ā·rêcitiesH5892
√ ʻîyr — a city (a place guarded by waking or a watch) in the widest sense (even of a mere encampment or post)Nounfeminine plural construct
יְהוּדָ֛הyə·hū·ḏāhof JudahH3063
√ Yᵉhûwdâh — Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉhûwdâh: Judah The southern kingdom, whose sister kingdom was deported six or eight chapters' worth of judgment earlier. Benson and Henry both read this invasion as God trying the faith of Hezekiah and chastising a people who had not joined his reformation with their hearts.
14

So Hezekiah king of Judah sent word to the king of Assyria at Lachish, saying, “I have done wrong; withdraw from me, and I will pay whatever you demand from me.” And the king of Assyria exacted from Hezekiah king of Judah three hundred talents of silver and thirty talents of gold.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ḥiz·qî·yāh me·leḵ- yə·hū·ḏāh way·yiš·laḥ ’el- me·leḵ- ’aš·šūr lā·ḵî·šāh lê·mōr ḥā·ṭā·ṯî šūḇ mê·‘ā·lay ’êṯ ’eś·śā ’ă·šer- tit·tên ‘ā·lay me·leḵ- ’aš·šūr way·yā·śem ‘al- ḥiz·qî·yāh me·leḵ- yə·hū·ḏāh šə·lōš mê·’ō·wṯ kik·kar- ke·sep̄ ū·šə·lō·šîm kik·kar zā·hāḇ

Word by word31 · parsed
חִזְקִיָּ֣הḥiz·qî·yāhSo HezekiahH2396
√ Chizqîyâh — Chizkijah, a king of Judah, also the name of two other IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
מֶֽלֶךְ־me·leḵ-kingH4428
√ melek — a kingNounmasculine singular construct
יְהוּדָ֣הyə·hū·ḏāhof JudahH3063
√ Yᵉhûwdâh — Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיִּשְׁלַ֣חway·yiš·laḥsentH7971
√ shâlach — to send away, for, or out (in a great variety of applications)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
shâlach: to send The narrative verb of the whole embassy. Gill weighs the reversal: Hezekiah had first encouraged his people not to fear the king of Assyria (2 Chronicles 32:1), and now sends to sue for peace.
אֶל־’el-word toH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPreposition
מֶֽלֶךְ־me·leḵ-the kingH4428
√ melek — a kingNounmasculine singular construct
אַשּׁוּר֩׀’aš·šūrof AssyriaH804
√ ʼAshshûwr — Ashshur, the second son of ShemNounproperfeminine singular
לָכִ֨ישָׁה׀lā·ḵî·šāhat LachishH3923
√ Lâkîysh — Lakish, a place in PalestineNounproperfeminine singularthird person feminine singular
Lâkîysh: Lachish K&D locates it at Um Lakis in the Judean plain, on the road to Egypt; JFB and Pulpit both report the British Museum bas-relief in which Sennacherib sits enthroned before the city. The submission is carried to the very place where Assyria was demonstrating what resistance costs.
לֵאמֹ֤ר׀lê·mōrsayingH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Preposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
חָטָ֙אתִי֙ḥā·ṭā·ṯîI have done wrongH2398
√ châṭâʼ — properly, to missVerbQalPerfectfirst person common singular
châṭâʼ: to miss, to sin One word, and the unit's whole moral question turns on its object, which Hebrew leaves unstated. Poole and Gill supply “against thee,” a political confession; Poole then allows the other reading, that Hezekiah's ill success “might make him think that he had sinned against God in this action.” K&D refuses to press it at all, holding that the confession was forced out by distress.
שׁ֣וּבšūḇwithdrawH7725
√ shûwb — to turn back (hence, away) transitively or intransitively, literally or figuratively (not necessarily with the idea of return to the starting point)VerbQalImperativemasculine singular
shûwb: to turn back An imperative aimed outward. In the mouth of every prophet this verb calls Israel home; in Hezekiah's mouth it asks an emperor to go home. The king who had broken the images (2 Kings 18:4) now asks the invader to do what he does not do himself.
מֵֽעָלַ֔יmê·‘ā·layfrom meH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition-mfirst person common singular
אֵ֛ת’êṯH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
אֶשָּׂ֑א’eś·śāand I will payH5375
√ nâsâʼ — to lift, in a great variety of applications, literal and figurative, absolute and relativeVerbQalImperfectfirst person common singular
nâsâʼ: to lift, to bear A very common verb (612 verses) whose weight here is contextual, not statistical. Hezekiah offers to carry whatever is laid on him; within a generation Isaiah will use the same verb of a Servant who bears what was laid on him by someone other than an emperor (Isaiah 53:4). Hezekiah's bearing buys a respite that Cambridge, citing Josephus, says Sennacherib did not honor.
אֲשֶׁר־’ă·šer-whateverH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
תִּתֵּ֥ןtit·tênyou demandH5414
√ nâthan — to give, used with greatest latitude of application (put, make, etcVerbQalImperfectsecond person masculine singular
nâthan: to give, to put The hinge verb of the unit. Sennacherib gives a burden; Hezekiah gives the silver (v. 15) and gives the gold (v. 16). Judah's giving here runs in exactly the wrong direction: away from the house of the LORD and into a pagan treasury.
עָלַ֖י‘ā·layfrom meH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPrepositionfirst person common singular
מֶֽלֶךְ־me·leḵ-And the kingH4428
√ melek — a kingNounmasculine singular construct
אַשּׁ֜וּר’aš·šūrof AssyriaH804
√ ʼAshshûwr — Ashshur, the second son of ShemNounproperfeminine singular
וַיָּ֨שֶׂםway·yā·śemexactedH7760
√ sûwm — to put (used in a great variety of applications, literal, figurative, inferentially, and elliptically)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
sûwm: to set, to lay upon Hezekiah asked what would be “given” upon him; the narrator answers with a heavier word, set or imposed. The open-ended offer is met with a fixed and crushing assessment.
עַל־‘al-fromH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
חִזְקִיָּ֣הḥiz·qî·yāhHezekiahH2396
√ Chizqîyâh — Chizkijah, a king of Judah, also the name of two other IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
מֶֽלֶךְ־me·leḵ-kingH4428
√ melek — a kingNounmasculine singular construct
יְהוּדָ֗הyə·hū·ḏāhof JudahH3063
√ Yᵉhûwdâh — Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
שְׁלֹ֤שׁšə·lōšthreeH7969
√ shâlôwsh — threeNumberfeminine singular construct
מֵאוֹת֙mê·’ō·wṯhundredH3967
√ mêʼâh — a hundredNumberfeminine plural
כִּכַּר־kik·kar-talentsH3603
√ kikkâr — a circle, iNounfeminine singular construct
kikkâr: a circle, a talent Literally a round loaf or disc, hence a weight. The commentators' modern equivalents differ widely (Gill cites Brerewood at 247,500 pounds; JFB gives 351,000 pounds; K&D reckons more than two and a half million thalers), which is itself worth recording: the sum is undoubtedly enormous, and no one can price it exactly.
כֶּ֔סֶףke·sep̄of silverH3701
√ keçeph — silver (from its pale color)Nounmasculine singular
וּשְׁלֹשִׁ֖יםū·šə·lō·šîmand thirtyH7970
√ shᵉlôwshîym — thirtyConjunctive wawNumbercommon plural
כִּכַּ֥רkik·kartalentsH3603
√ kikkâr — a circle, iNounfeminine singular construct
זָהָֽב׃zā·hāḇof goldH2091
√ zâhâb — gold, figuratively, something gold-colored (iNounmasculine singular
zâhâb: gold Named here as a figure on a ledger; named again in v. 16 as the skin of the temple doors. The same substance moves from the sanctuary to the invoice.
15

Hezekiah gave him all the silver that was found in the house of the LORD and in the treasuries of the royal palace.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ḥiz·qî·yāh ’eṯ- way·yit·tên kāl- hak·ke·sep̄ han·nim·ṣā ḇêṯ- Yah·weh ū·ḇə·’ō·ṣə·rō·wṯ ham·me·leḵ bêṯ

Word by word11 · parsed
חִזְקִיָּ֔הḥiz·qî·yāhHezekiahH2396
√ Chizqîyâh — Chizkijah, a king of Judah, also the name of two other IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
וַיִּתֵּן֙way·yit·têngave himH5414
√ nâthan — to give, used with greatest latitude of application (put, make, etcConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
nâthan: to give Consecutive imperfect: the narrative simply proceeds. There is no lament, no prophetic word, no oracle in this verse. The historian records the transfer and moves on, and the silence is part of the record.
כָּל־kāl-allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
הַכֶּ֖סֶףhak·ke·sep̄the silverH3701
√ keçeph — silver (from its pale color)ArticleNounmasculine singular
הַנִּמְצָ֣אhan·nim·ṣāthat was foundH4672
√ mâtsâʼ — properly, to come forth to, iArticleVerbNifalParticiplemasculine singular
mâtsâʼ: to come forth to, to find The Nifal participle makes the silver the thing found rather than the thing kept. The phrase “all the silver that was found” is not a boast of wealth but an audit of what was left after Ahaz.
בֵית־ḇêṯ-in the houseH1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcNounmasculine singular construct
יְהוָ֑הYah·wehof the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉhôvâh: the LORD The divine name appears in this unit only as the owner of the house that is being emptied (here and v. 16). He is named, and He does not speak. Not until 2 Kings 19, after the tribute has bought nothing, does the LORD answer through Isaiah.
וּבְאֹצְר֖וֹתū·ḇə·’ō·ṣə·rō·wṯand in the treasuriesH214
√ ʼôwtsâr — a depositoryConjunctive waw, Preposition-bNounmasculine plural construct
ʼôwtsâr: a depository, treasury The same noun stands in 2 Kings 24:13, where Nebuchadnezzar carries off the treasures of the house of the LORD and the treasures of the king's house, and cuts in pieces the vessels of gold. Hezekiah's emptying of these two treasuries prefigures, in miniature and with the same vocabulary, the emptying that ends the kingdom.
הַמֶּֽלֶךְ׃ham·me·leḵof the royalH4428
√ melek — a kingArticleNounmasculine singular
melek: king The word governs this unit: a king of Judah, a king of Asshur, a king's house, and the temple of the God who is the actual King. Only one of these is not named as receiving anything.
בֵּ֥יתbêṯpalaceH1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcNounmasculine singular construct
16

At that time Hezekiah stripped the gold with which he had plated the doors and doorposts of the temple of the LORD, and he gave it to the king of Assyria.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ha·hî bā·‘êṯ ḥiz·qî·yāh ’eṯ- qiṣ·ṣaṣ ḥiz·qî·yāh ṣip·pāh dal·ṯō·wṯ wə·’eṯ- hā·’ō·mə·nō·wṯ ’ă·šer hê·ḵal Yah·weh me·leḵ yə·hū·ḏāh way·yit·tə·nêm lə·me·leḵ ’aš·šūr

Word by word18 · parsed
הַהִ֗יאha·hîAt thatH1931
√ hûwʼ — he (she or it)ArticlePronounthird person feminine singular
בָּעֵ֣תbā·‘êṯtimeH6256
√ ʻêth — time, especially (adverb with preposition) now, when, etcPreposition-b, ArticleNouncommon singular
ʻêth: time “At that time” brackets the act as an episode rather than a policy, which is how Gill reads Hezekiah's intent: he stripped the gold “no doubt with a full purpose to replace it.”
חִזְקִיָּ֜הḥiz·qî·yāhHezekiahH2396
√ Chizqîyâh — Chizkijah, a king of Judah, also the name of two other IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
קִצַּ֨ץqiṣ·ṣaṣstripped [the gold]H7112
√ qâtsats — to chop off (literally or figuratively)VerbPielPerfectthird person masculine singular
qâtsats: to chop off A rare and violent verb (14 verses) that carries a genealogy of desecration: Ahaz cuts off the borders of the bases and the temple vessels (2 Kings 16:17; 2 Chronicles 28:24), Hezekiah cuts off the gold of the doors here, and Nebuchadnezzar cuts in pieces all the vessels of gold in the temple of the LORD (2 Kings 24:13). The same verb, three kings, one direction of travel.
חִזְקִיָּ֖הḥiz·qî·yāhwith whichH2396
√ Chizqîyâh — Chizkijah, a king of Judah, also the name of two other IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
צִפָּ֔הṣip·pāhhe had platedH6823
√ tsâphâh — to sheet over (especially with metal)VerbPielPerfectthird person masculine singular
tsâphâh: to sheet over with metal A Piel perfect describing Hezekiah's own earlier reformation (2 Chronicles 29:3, cited by K&D). Cambridge draws the pathos out: “He had been rejoiced at the purification and adornment of the temple, and must have been very hard driven ere he consented to undo the work which he had so lately done.”
דַּלְת֨וֹתdal·ṯō·wṯthe doorsH1817
√ deleth — something swinging, iNounfeminine plural construct
וְאֶת־wə·’eṯ-andH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
הָאֹ֣מְנ֔וֹתhā·’ō·mə·nō·wṯdoorpostsH547
√ ʼômᵉnâh — a columnArticleNounfeminine plural
ʼômᵉnâh: a support, column A word so rare that the translations divide (supports, posts, pillars, framework). K&D, Ellicott, Poole and Gill all comment on it separately, which is the honest sign of a term whose precise referent is not recoverable. What is certain is that the load-bearing parts of the doorway were gilded, and now are not.
אֲשֶׁ֣ר’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
הֵיכַ֤לhê·ḵalof the templeH1964
√ hêykâl — a large public building, such as a palace or templeNounmasculine singular construct
hêykâl: palace, temple The construct chain hêykal YHWH, the palace of the LORD. The unit's entire economy runs downhill from this noun: gold that was put on the LORD's palace is taken off and carried to Nineveh.
יְהוָה֙Yah·wehof the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉhôvâh: the LORD The second and last appearance of the divine name in the unit, again as possessor of what is being carried away. He is the silent party to every transaction here.
מֶ֣לֶךְme·leḵand [he]H4428
√ melek — a kingNounmasculine singular construct
יְהוּדָ֑הyə·hū·ḏāh. . .H3063
√ Yᵉhûwdâh — Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַֽיִּתְּנֵ֖םway·yit·tə·nêmgave itH5414
√ nâthan — to give, used with greatest latitude of application (put, make, etcConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singularthird person masculine plural
nâthan: to give The third and final nâthan of the unit (vv. 14, 15, 16), and the plural suffix (“gave them”) points back to the stripped plates. The chain that began with “whatever you give upon me” ends with the temple's gold in an Assyrian wagon.
לְמֶ֥לֶךְlə·me·leḵto the kingH4428
√ melek — a kingPreposition-lNounmasculine singular construct
אַשּֽׁוּר׃פ’aš·šūrof AssyriaH804
√ ʼAshshûwr — Ashshur, the second son of ShemNounproperfeminine singular
ʼAshshûwr: Asshur, Assyria The unit's last word. Cambridge, citing Josephus (Ant. x. 1. 1), reports that Sennacherib took the payment and sent his officers against Jerusalem anyway, which is exactly what v. 17 goes on to narrate.

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. A date that will not be harmonized — 13

The unit opens on a number the sources cannot reconcile, and the honest thing is to say so first. Ellicott lays out the arithmetic: Samaria falls in 722 or 721 B.C., which 2 Kings 18:10 makes Hezekiah's sixth year, so his fourteenth would be 714 or 713, while “Sennacherib's own monuments, however, fix the date of the expedition against Judah and Egypt at 701 B.C.” His verdict is the one this edition adopts: the divergence must not be explained away. Barnes calls the synchronism “hopelessly at variance” with the Assyrian data and proposes removing the note of time as a marginal intrusion; Pulpit goes further and reconstructs how a later redactor might have taken the fourteen from 2 Kings 20:6. ⚙ These are conjectures, and this edition marks them as conjectures: no manuscript evidence is offered for the excision, and the number stands in the Hebrew. What is not conjecture is the invasion itself. Pulpit quotes Sennacherib's own prism, “forty-six strong cities, fortresses, and smaller cities round about them without number... I besieged, I captured,” and JFB describes the Lachish bas-reliefs in which the king's own scribes name the city and the king. The enemy's archive corroborates the narrative it was written to glorify.

ii. The word that means two things — 14

Hezekiah's embassy contains one verb of confession, חָטָ֙אתִי֙ (ḥā·ṭā·ṯî, H2398), and the commentators split over its object because the Hebrew supplies none. Ellicott gives the diplomatic reading, observing that in the Assyrian inscriptions “the term ‘sin’ is constantly used of ‘revolts’”; Gill agrees, glossing “not the Lord, but the king of Assyria.” Poole allows both: Hezekiah confesses to Sennacherib, yet his ill success “might make him think that he had sinned against God in this action.” K&D declines to weigh it at all, since the confession “is not to be pressed, inasmuch as it was forced from Hezekiah by the pressure of distress,” and then argues that shaking off a yoke imposed by Tiglath-pileser's faithlessness toward Ahaz was no real wrong; Hezekiah's actual fault, on this reading, lay in losing his nerve afterward. Cambridge takes the opposite view, that the confession shows the rebellion had no provocation behind it. Geneva, in one sentence, records what all of them see: “As his zeal was before praised, so his weakness is here set forth, that no one should glory in himself.” ⚙ Note what the Hebrew does that none of the English versions can: the only imperative Hezekiah utters is שׁ֣וּב (šūḇ, H7725), the prophets' word for repentance, and he spends it on Sennacherib.

iii. Undoing his own work — 15-16

Two verses, one verb repeated: nâthan, to give. Hezekiah gives the silver of the LORD's house and the king's house (v. 15), then cuts off the gold he had himself laid on the temple doors and gives that too (v. 16). Barnes states the tragedy without ornament: “Ahaz had already exhausted the treasuries 2 Kings 16:8; Hezekiah was therefore compelled to undo his own work.” Pulpit and Cambridge both note there had been only about thirty years to rebuild a reserve Ahaz had drained. JFB adds that the tribute obliged him “not only to drain all the treasures of the palace and the temple, but even to strip the doors and pillars of the sacred edifice of the gold that adorned them.” Poole reads the plating itself as an act of repair, Hezekiah “repairing the injury which his father had done to them, and putting them into the same condition in which Solomon left them.” Which means the gold now going to Nineveh is precisely the gold of the reformation. Gill preserves two further judgments: that Hezekiah stripped it “no doubt with a full purpose to replace it,” and that the Talmudic writers counted this among three things they disapproved of in him. Cambridge closes the account by reporting Josephus's claim that Sennacherib pocketed the payment and sent his officers against Jerusalem regardless. Scripture does not make that claim; it simply narrates v. 17.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested. Scripture here does exactly what it does not do elsewhere: it declines to comment. There is no prophet in these four verses, no oracle, no “and the LORD said,” no verdict on Hezekiah's embassy. The divine name occurs twice, both times as the owner of a building being stripped. Every commentator fills the silence with a judgment, and their judgments contradict one another: K&D says the confession cannot be pressed, Cambridge says it proves the rebellion unprovoked, Geneva says it is weakness set down so that no one may glory, Gill says it betrayed distrust of God's providence, Poole and Benson say God permitted the whole calamity to try Hezekiah's faith. ⚙ The text itself permits all of these and demands none. What the text does insist on is the vocabulary. Hezekiah offers to bear (nâsâʼ) whatever is given (nâthan) upon him; he then gives the silver, cuts off (qâtsats) the gold, and gives that. A man can pay a real price, empty a real treasury, strip a real sanctuary, and purchase nothing at all: three verses later the officers of Asshur are at the conduit of the upper pool. The deliverance, when it comes in 2 Kings 19, costs Hezekiah nothing and comes only after he has nothing left to spend. ⚙ Read that way, this unit is not primarily about Hezekiah's failure of nerve, though it may be that; it is about the difference between a ransom a king can raise and a deliverance only God can give.

Hezekiah paid everything he had and bought nothing; what saved Jerusalem cost him nothing at all. (a fallible synthesis, not a verse of Scripture)

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The same campaign told three times verbal / quotation: confirmed

2 Kings 18:13 is reproduced almost word for word at Isaiah 36:1, and again, with the tribute omitted, at 2 Chronicles 32:1. JFB records the relation plainly: the account of Sennacherib's invasion and the destruction of his army “is repeated almost verbatim in 2Ch 32:1-33 and Isa 36:1-37:38.” K&D adds the source-critical judgment, that all three narratives are “drawn independently of one another from a collection of the prophecies of Isaiah, which was received into the annals of the kingdom (2 Chronicles 32:32).” The Verifier confirms shared lexemes at each parallel, including the rare royal name. Cambridge notes the one substantive difference: “The Chronicler takes no notice of the payment of tribute to Sennacherib.”

Isaiah 36:1 · 2 Chronicles 32:1 · 2 Chronicles 32:9

basis: Verifier: Isaiah 36:1 shares H5576 Çanchêrîyb (rare, in 13 vv), H702 ʼarbaʻ (277 vv), H6240 ʻâsâr (291 vv); 2 Chronicles 32:1 shares H5576 (13 vv), H1219 bâtsar (37 vv), H804 ʼAshshûwr (138 vv); 2 Chronicles 32:9 shares H5576 (13 vv), H2396 Chizqîyâh (116 vv), H804 (138 vv). The rare name plus near-identical wording at Isaiah 36:1 supports a verbal tier

Qâtsats: three kings who cut the temple apart verbal / quotation: confirmed

The verb Hezekiah uses on the temple doors, קִצַּ֨ץ (qâtsats, H7112, to chop off), is rare, and its occurrences form a line. Ahaz cut in pieces the borders of the bases and the temple vessels (2 Chronicles 28:24; Ellicott points to the parallel act at 2 Kings 16:17). Hezekiah cuts the gold from the doors here. Nebuchadnezzar cuts in pieces all the vessels of gold that Solomon made in the temple of the LORD, and carries off the treasures of the LORD's house and the king's house, at 2 Kings 24:13, which also shares this unit's words for gold and treasury. ⚙ The sequence is the tool's own observation; the shared lexemes are the Verifier's. Barnes, Pulpit and Cambridge independently note the Ahaz link at the level of history.

2 Chronicles 28:24 · 2 Kings 24:13

basis: Verifier: 2 Chronicles 28:24 shares H7112 qâtsats (rare, in 14 vv) and H1817 deleth (78 vv); 2 Kings 24:13 shares H7112 qâtsats (14 vv), H2091 zâhâb (336 vv) and H214 ʼôwtsâr (70 vv). The rarity of qâtsats carries the verbal tier; no quotation is claimed, only a shared rare lexeme

The tribute that bought nothing structural / thematic: confirmed

Hezekiah pays in v. 16 and the Assyrian officers arrive in v. 17, sent from the same Lachish to which the tribute was carried. The Verifier records the shared vocabulary between this unit and 2 Kings 18:17, and between it and the campaign's end at 2 Kings 19:36 and Isaiah 37:37, where Sennacherib departs without the city. ⚙ The link is narrative and thematic rather than quotational, so it is tiered structural. Cambridge supplies the extra-biblical explanation from Josephus, that the terms were broken; the biblical text offers no explanation at all, and the bare juxtaposition of vv. 16 and 17 is the whole argument.

2 Kings 18:17 · 2 Kings 19:36 · Isaiah 37:37

basis: Verifier: 2 Kings 18:17 shares H2396 Chizqîyâh (116 vv), H804 ʼAshshûwr (138 vv), H3923 Lâkîysh (22 vv); 2 Kings 19:36 and Isaiah 37:37 share H5576 Çanchêrîyb (13 vv) and H804 (138 vv). Real shared lexemes, but the link asserted here is sequence and outcome, not quotation, so the tier is downgraded to structural

Emptying the same two treasuries structural / thematic: confirmed

“All the silver that was found in the house of the LORD, and in the treasuries of the king's house” describes an act that had already happened in living memory and would happen again. Cambridge: “The like emptying of the treasuries both of the temple and of the king had been made a very few years before (2 Kings 16:8) by Ahaz to purchase the alliance of Tiglath-pileser against Pekah and Rezin.” Gill notes it “had been done more than once before by the kings of Judah,” pointing to Joash at 2 Kings 12:18. The pattern ends at 2 Kings 24:13, where the treasuries are emptied by an enemy rather than by a king trying to buy one off.

2 Kings 16:8 · 2 Kings 12:18 · 2 Kings 24:13

basis: Verifier basis available for 2 Kings 24:13 only (shared H214 ʼôwtsâr, in 70 vv; H2091 zâhâb, 336 vv; H7112 qâtsats, 14 vv). The links to 2 Kings 16:8 and 2 Kings 12:18 are carried by named commentary (Cambridge, Pulpit, Gill) and by repeated motif, not by a Verifier-computed lexeme overlap, so the whole thread is tiered structural

“I will bear it”: a king's word and a Servant's structural / thematic: confirmed

Hezekiah's promise is אֶשָּׂ֑א (’eś·śā, H5375 nâsâʼ), “I will bear.” The same root stands in Isaiah 53:4, “Surely he hath borne our griefs.” ⚙ The tool checked this pair directly: the Verifier returns the shared lexeme and refuses a verbal tier, because nâsâʼ occurs in 612 verses and proves nothing by itself. What is worth recording is the contrast, not the vocabulary: Hezekiah offers to bear a burden an emperor lays on him, in exchange for a peace that lasts three verses; the Servant of Isaiah 53, in the same prophetic book that reports this very campaign, bears a burden laid on him by the LORD. Both texts belong to the Isaianic corpus, which K&D identifies as this narrative's source.

Isaiah 53:4

basis: Verifier pair check on 2 Kings 18:14 and Isaiah 53:4 returns shared lexeme H5375 nâsâʼ (in 612 vv), a common word: the link is a deliberate thematic contrast within the Isaianic corpus, not a verbal allusion, and is tiered accordingly

Where the fourteenth year may have come from flagged: verify source

Pulpit proposes that the original writer gave no date at all, and that a later redactor supplied “In the fourteenth year of King Hezekiah,” “having obtained the number from 2 Kings 20:6,” where Hezekiah is granted fifteen added years. Barnes independently judges the note of time an intrusion “having crept in from the margin.” ⚙ This edition records the proposal and does not adopt it. No manuscript evidence is cited by either commentator; the number is present in the Hebrew text; and the link between this verse and 2 Kings 20:6 exists only inside a reconstruction of how the book was edited. It is listed here so the reader can weigh it, flagged rather than affirmed.

2 Kings 20:6 · 2 Kings 18:10

basis: No Verifier lexeme overlap supports this link. Its only basis is a source-critical conjecture by Pulpit (a redactor borrowing the number from 2 Kings 20:6), paralleled by Barnes's proposal that the date crept in from a margin. The provenance of the date is genuinely disputed against the Assyrian records, and the proposed remedy is unattested in any manuscript named by these sources

Silver and gold that cannot redeem typological

Three hundred talents of silver and thirty of gold are stripped from the sanctuary to ransom a city, and the ransom fails. ⚙ Peter names the general principle without naming Hezekiah: those redeemed were “not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold,” but with precious blood (1 Peter 1:18-19); Hebrews contrasts the blood of goats and calves with an eternal redemption obtained once (Hebrews 9:12). This is a cross-Testament link, so no shared Strong's number is possible between the Hebrew and the Greek and none is claimed. The connection is the shape of the transaction: a sanctuary's metal offered as a price, and a price that does not hold.

1 Peter 1:18-19 · Hebrews 9:12

basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's lexemes are impossible by definition and no verbal tier is available. The basis is a figural reading of the failed ransom against the apostolic teaching on redemption; the reading is the tool's own and is marked novel in the Christ section

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

The temple whose glory could not be stripped ancient/widely-held

The gold comes off the doors of הֵיכַ֤ל יְהוָה֙ (hêkal YHWH), and K&D notes the plates were ones Hezekiah had laid on himself during his own restoration (2 Chronicles 29:3). A sanctuary's visible glory proved to be removable, chargeable, and in the end insufficient. ⚙ The Gospel of John records Jesus identifying his own body as the temple that would be destroyed and raised in three days (John 2:19-21), and Hebrews sets a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, against the one whose furniture could be inventoried (Hebrews 9:11). The identification of Christ with the true temple is ancient and widely held; the particular contrast drawn here from Hezekiah's chisel is the tool's own extension of it.

John 2:19-21 · Hebrews 9:11

A ransom that failed and a ransom that held novel

⚙ Hezekiah's payment is described with complete financial precision and no spiritual comment: three hundred talents of silver, thirty of gold, the doors, the supports. It secured, at most, a pause. Peter's language is the exact negative of this scene: not with corruptible things, as silver and gold (1 Peter 1:18), and Jesus speaks of the Son of Man giving his life a ransom for many (Mark 10:45). ⚙ No commentator in this brief draws that line, and this edition does not claim one does. It is offered as a reading to be tested: the Old Testament repeatedly shows kings buying deliverance and losing it, which is one of the ways it teaches what kind of ransom would have to be paid instead.

Mark 10:45 · 1 Peter 1:18-19

The king who said “I have sinned” and the King who could not novel

The best king Judah had since David (2 Kings 18:5) opens his one recorded speech in this unit with חָטָ֙אתִי֙, “I have sinned,” and the commentators cannot agree whether he meant it toward Sennacherib or toward God. Geneva draws the conclusion the narrative invites: his weakness “is here set forth, that no one should glory in himself.” ⚙ The Fallible Synthetic Study Bible reads this as the book of Kings doing what it always does, presenting a good king and then showing precisely where he is not the one Israel needs. Isaiah, whose prophecies K&D identifies as the source of this very narrative, announces a Servant in whose mouth was no deceit (Isaiah 53:9), and the apostolic witness names him as the one who knew no sin (2 Corinthians 5:21). The pattern of a failing Davidic king pointing beyond himself is an ancient reading; its application to this particular sentence is the tool's own.

Isaiah 53:9 · 2 Corinthians 5:21 · 2 Kings 18:5

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

Text. The Hebrew of these four verses is not disputed, but its chronology is. The phrase “in the fourteenth year of king Hezekiah” is irreconcilable with the Assyrian records of Sennacherib's 701 B.C. campaign, and this edition records the conflict rather than resolving it. Ellicott calls the divergence remarkable and refuses to explain it away; Barnes judges the synchronism “hopelessly at variance” with the inscriptions and proposes deleting the note of time as a marginal gloss; Pulpit proposes a later redactor who took the number from 2 Kings 20:6. ⚙ Both emendation proposals are conjectural and rest on no manuscript evidence cited in these sources.

Grammar. Two roughnesses are preserved rather than smoothed. K&D notes that the suffix on וַֽיִּתְפְּשֵֽׂם (v. 13) is masculine where the feminine plural “cities” would require feminine. And the interlinear supplied for v. 16 lists the two occurrences of Chizqîyâh at indices 2 and 5 with the second glossed “with which,” which does not match the Hebrew word: the name is the subject of the relative clause about the plating. This edition has followed the Hebrew surface forms, not the English gloss alignment, in the literal rendering.

Sums. Sennacherib's own inscription claims eight hundred talents of silver where the Hebrew has three hundred. Ellicott explains the gap by the light Babylonian talent standing to the heavy Palestinian talent as eight to three; Pulpit offers three alternatives (exaggeration, the total silver taken from all Judea, or a distinction between a peace payment and a fixed tribute). No source in this brief settles it. Modern equivalents given by the commentators diverge widely and should not be quoted as precise.

Extra-biblical material. The Sennacherib prism, the Lachish bas-reliefs, Josephus's claim that the terms were broken, the Talmudic censure of Hezekiah reported by Gill, and Bishop Hall's judgment quoted by Cambridge are all reported here as what named sources say, never as Scripture. ⚙ The synthesis layer in this unit (marked ⚙ throughout) is fallible and is offered to be tested; the silence of the text about Hezekiah's motive is real, and any confident account of that motive, including this edition's, is inference.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)