The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

2 Kings2:19–22

Elisha Heals the Waters of Jericho

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

2 Kings 2:19–22 — Elisha Heals the Waters of Jericho. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

19

Then the men of the city said to Elisha, “Please note, our lord, that the city’s location is good, as you can see. But the water is bad and the land is unfruitful.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

’an·šê hā·‘îr way·yō·mə·rū ’el- ’ĕ·lî·šā‘ nā hin·nêh- ’ă·ḏō·nî hā·‘îr mō·wō·šaḇ ṭō·wḇ ka·’ă·šer rō·’eh wə·ham·ma·yim rā·‘îm wə·hā·’ā·reṣ mə·šak·kā·leṯ

Word by word17 · parsed
אַנְשֵׁ֤י’an·šêThen the menH582
√ ʼĕnôwsh — a man in general (singly or collectively)Nounmasculine plural construct
הָעִיר֙hā·‘îrof the cityH5892
√ ʻîyr — a city (a place guarded by waking or a watch) in the widest sense (even of a mere encampment or post)ArticleNounfeminine singular
וַיֹּ֨אמְר֜וּway·yō·mə·rūsaidH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
אֶל־’el-toH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPreposition
אֱלִישָׁ֔ע’ĕ·lî·šā‘ElishaH477
√ ʼĔlîyshâʻ — Elisha, the famous prophetNounpropermasculine singular
נָ֞אPleaseH4994
√ nâʼ — 'I pray', 'now', or 'then'Interjection
הִנֵּה־hin·nêh-noteH2009
√ hinnêh — lo!Interjection
hinnêh: lo! A pointing particle, not a verb. It hands the prophet an object to look at.
אֲדֹנִ֖י’ă·ḏō·nîour lordH113
√ ʼâdôwn — sovereign, iNounmasculine singular constructfirst person common singular
ʼâdôwn: sovereign, lord With the first person suffix, “my lord.” Deference from civic authorities to a prophet who, until a few days before, was known only as Elijah's attendant.
הָעִיר֙hā·‘îrthat the city’sH5892
√ ʻîyr — a city (a place guarded by waking or a watch) in the widest sense (even of a mere encampment or post)ArticleNounfeminine singular
מוֹשַׁ֤בmō·wō·šaḇlocationH4186
√ môwshâb — a seatNounmasculine singular construct
môwshâb: a seat The construct seat of the city. Cambridge notes that Jericho's position near the Jordan crossing drew a considerable population, and that for the sake of prosperity coming to them other ways the people were content to dwell in such an unwholesome place. The word therefore names the exact tension of the unit: a good place to sit, with death in the water.
ט֔וֹבṭō·wḇis goodH2896
√ ṭôwb — good (as an adjective) in the widest senseAdjectivemasculine singular
ṭôwb: good, in the widest sense The verdict word of Genesis 1 is spoken over the site and withheld from the spring. Pulpit gathers the travelers' testimony that Jericho was, even before the miracle, a pleasant place. Cambridge adds that Genesis 13:10 compares this country to the garden of the LORD. The unit opens with an Eden that kills.
כַּאֲשֶׁ֥רka·’ă·šerasH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPreposition-kPronounrelative
רֹאֶ֑הrō·’eh[you] can seeH7200
√ râʼâh — to see, literally or figuratively (in numerous applications, direct and implied, transitive, intransitive and causative)VerbQalParticiplemasculine singular
râʼâh: to see Qal participle, ongoing: “as my lord is seeing.” They appeal to what is visible, and then name what is not.
וְהַמַּ֥יִםwə·ham·ma·yimBut the waterH4325
√ mayim — waterConjunctive waw, ArticleNounmasculine plural
רָעִ֖יםrā·‘îm[is] badH7451
√ raʻ — bad or (as noun) evil (natural or moral)Adjectivemasculine plural
raʻ: bad, evil (natural or moral) Not a technical word for brackish or saline. Pulpit describes the bitter and brackish springs of the Jordan valley that spread disease rather than health, but the Hebrew simply calls the water evil, leaving open whether the evil is chemical, judicial, or both. Benson and Poole both raise the possibility that it came from the curse of God, whether from Joshua's day or from Hiel's rebuilding.
וְהָאָ֥רֶץwə·hā·’ā·reṣand the landH776
√ ʼerets — the earth (at large, or partitively a land)Conjunctive waw, ArticleNounfeminine singular
מְשַׁכָּֽלֶת׃mə·šak·kā·leṯis unfruitfulH7921
√ shâkôl — properly, to miscarry, iVerbPielParticiplefeminine singular
šâkôl: to miscarry, to bereave of children (Piel) The Piel participle is the theological hinge of the whole unit. Ellicott notes that the Piel may be factitive or intensive, so the phrase means either that the land bears dead births or that it has many miscarriages, and he cross-refers Exodus 23:26 and Malachi 3:11, the two covenant texts where God promises that nothing in Israel shall miscarry. The land is doing to Israel precisely what the covenant promised would never happen.
20

“Bring me a new bowl,” he replied, “and put some salt in it.” So they brought it to him,

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

qə·ḥū- lî ḥă·ḏā·šāh ṣə·lō·ḥîṯ way·yō·mer wə·śî·mū me·laḥ šām way·yiq·ḥū ’ê·lāw

Word by word10 · parsed
קְחוּ־qə·ḥū-BringH3947
√ lâqach — to take (in the widest variety of applications)VerbQalImperativemasculine plural
lâqach: to take Qal imperative, masculine plural. Elisha addresses the delegation, not a servant.
לִי֙me
Prepositionfirst person common singular
חֲדָשָׁ֔הḥă·ḏā·šāha newH2319
√ châdâsh — newAdjectivefeminine singular
châdâsh: new Ritual newness, the category of Numbers 19:2 and 2 Samuel 6:3 that Ellicott invokes. Cambridge reads the purity and freshness of the vessel as typifying the purification wrought upon the spring, and is careful to deny that it was the means of healing. Poole adds the negative argument: a used vessel would leave room both for suspicion of natural virtue and for legal pollution.
צְלֹחִ֣יתṣə·lō·ḥîṯbowlH6746
√ tsᵉlôchîyth — something prolonged or tall, iNounfeminine singular
tsᵉlôchîyth: something prolonged or tall Found nowhere else in the Hebrew Bible. Cambridge notes that the old English word “cruse,” akin to “cruet” and “crucible,” already stood at 1 Kings 14:3 for a different Hebrew word. Our English tradition is more confident about this vessel than the Hebrew ever was.
וַיֹּ֗אמֶרway·yō·merhe repliedH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
וְשִׂ֥ימוּwə·śî·mūand putH7760
√ sûwm — to put (used in a great variety of applications, literal, figurative, inferentially, and elliptically)Conjunctive wawVerbQalImperativemasculine plural
sûwm: to put, to set Qal imperative plural again. They fill the vessel; he alone will throw it.
מֶ֑לַחme·laḥsome saltH4417
√ melach — properly, powder, iNounmasculine singular
melach: salt (properly, powder) Barnes reads the new dish and the salt as chosen for symbolism, the salt being a common Scriptural symbol of incorruption, citing Leviticus 2:13, Ezekiel 43:24 and Matthew 5:13. Pulpit and Benson press the opposite edge: physically, salt is the worst possible remedy for a brackish spring, so the choice of it forecloses any naturalistic account of the cure. Both readings are in the text at once, and the unit needs both.
שָׁ֖םšāmin itH8033
√ shâm — there (transferring to time) thenAdverb
וַיִּקְח֖וּway·yiq·ḥūSo they brought [it]H3947
√ lâqach — to take (in the widest variety of applications)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
lâqach: to take The same root as the command, now in the narrative past. Obedience reported without comment.
אֵלָֽיו׃’ê·lāwto himH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPrepositionthird person masculine singular
21

and Elisha went out to the spring, cast the salt into it, and said, “This is what the LORD says: ‘I have healed this water. No longer will it cause death or unfruitfulness.’”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

way·yê·ṣê ’el- mō·w·ṣā ham·ma·yim way·yaš·leḵ- me·laḥ šām way·yō·mer kōh- Yah·weh ’ā·mar rip·pi·ṯî hā·’êl·leh lam·ma·yim lō- ‘ō·wḏ yih·yeh miš·šām mā·weṯ ū·mə·šak·kā·leṯ

Word by word20 · parsed
וַיֵּצֵא֙way·yê·ṣêand [Elisha] went outH3318
√ yâtsâʼ — to go (causatively, bring) out, in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively, direct and proximConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
yâtsâʼ: to go out Elisha leaves the city to reach the head of the water. The cure is not administered in the town square.
אֶל־’el-toH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPreposition
מוֹצָ֣אmō·w·ṣāthe springH4161
√ môwtsâʼ — a going forth, iNounmasculine singular construct
môwtsâʼ: a going forth, a source Barnes, Cambridge, K&D and Pulpit converge on Ain es Sultan, the one copious spring near the ancient site, described as a large and beautiful fountain of sweet and pleasant water, while the other springs of the region remain brackish to this day. That convergence is topographical, not textual: the Hebrew names no spring.
הַמַּ֔יִםham·ma·yim. . .H4325
√ mayim — waterArticleNounmasculine plural
וַיַּשְׁלֶךְ־way·yaš·leḵ-castH7993
√ shâlak — to throw out, down or away (literally or figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbHifilConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
šâlak: to throw out, down or away (Hiphil) A verb of casting away, used elsewhere for what is discarded. Poole weighs the quantity, the quality of salt, and the fact that a fountain quickly works out anything put into it, and concludes the act was a sign of God's presence and power, comparing Exodus 15:25, 2 Kings 4:41 and 2 Kings 6:6. Those three parallels are all prophetic sign-acts where a useless material accompanies a real word.
מֶ֑לַחme·laḥthe saltH4417
√ melach — properly, powder, iNounmasculine singular
שָׁ֖םšāminto itH8033
√ shâm — there (transferring to time) thenAdverb
וַיֹּ֜אמֶרway·yō·merand saidH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
כֹּֽה־kōh-This is whatH3541
√ kôh — properly, like this, iAdverb
kôh: thus, like this With ʼâmar following, this is the messenger formula. Elisha is quoting, not prescribing.
יְהוָ֗הYah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉhôvâh: the covenant name The name is the whole weight of the verse. Ellicott: not the prophet's own power, nor the natural virtues of the salt, but the Divine creative will was effectual to the healing of the spring. Geneva says the same from the other side, that God gave the power.
אָמַ֣ר’ā·marsaysH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
רִפִּ֙אתִי֙rip·pi·ṯîI have healedH7495
√ râphâʼ — properly, to mend (by stitching), iVerbPielPerfectfirst person common singular
râphâʼ: to mend, to heal (Piel perfect, 1cs) The Piel intensive of a verb whose root picture is stitching a tear. Spoken in the perfect by the LORD himself, it makes the salt a sign of an accomplished fact rather than a cause of a coming one. Cambridge presses the point that the prophet's words carry the thought from the sign to the thing signified.
הָאֵ֔לֶּהhā·’êl·lehthisH428
√ ʼêl-leh — these or thoseArticlePronouncommon plural
לַמַּ֣יִםlam·ma·yimwaterH4325
√ mayim — waterPreposition-l, ArticleNounmasculine plural
לֹֽא־lō-NoH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absAdverbNegative particle
ע֖וֹד‘ō·wḏlongerH5750
√ ʻôwd — properly, iteration or continuanceAdverb
יִהְיֶ֥הyih·yehwill it causeH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iVerbQalImperfectthird person masculine singular
hâyâh: to be, to exist Qal imperfect with lōʼ ʻōwḏ: “there shall not be any more.” The negation is durative, not a one-time repair, which is what v. 22 will verify.
מִשָּׁ֛םmiš·šām. . .H8033
√ shâm — there (transferring to time) thenPreposition-mAdverb
מָ֥וֶתmā·weṯdeathH4194
√ mâveth — death (natural or violent)Nounmasculine singular
mâveth: death (natural or violent) Poole notes that death here is used as it often is, for hurt or danger, to men or beasts, from drinking the water. The undoing is stated in the two hardest nouns available: death, and the death of the unborn.
וּמְשַׁכָּֽלֶת׃ū·mə·šak·kā·leṯor unfruitfulnessH7921
√ shâkôl — properly, to miscarry, iConjunctive wawVerbPielParticiplefeminine singular
šâkôl: to miscarry, to bereave (Piel participle) The people's word, returned to them in the mouth of the LORD. Whatever else the sign means, the covenant promise of Exodus 23:26 is being enforced at one spring in a city under a curse.
22

And the waters there have been healthy to this day, according to the word spoken by Elisha.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ham·ma·yim way·yê·rā·p̄ū ‘aḏ haz·zeh hay·yō·wm kiḏ·ḇar ’ă·šer dib·bêr ’ĕ·lî·šā‘

Word by word9 · parsed
הַמַּ֔יִםham·ma·yimAnd the waters [there]H4325
√ mayim — waterArticleNounmasculine plural
וַיֵּרָפ֣וּway·yê·rā·p̄ūhave been healthyH7495
√ râphâʼ — properly, to mend (by stitching), iConjunctive wawVerbNifalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
râphâʼ: to mend, to heal (Nifal) The passive of the verb Elisha spoke in the Piel. Hebrew narrative regularly verifies an oracle by echoing its verb in a new stem, and that is the entire literary argument of this verse: the word was true, and here is the same verb to prove it.
עַ֖ד‘aḏtoH5704
√ ʻad — as far (or long, or much) as, whether of space (even unto) or time (during, while, until) or degree (equally with)Preposition
הַזֶּ֑הhaz·zehthisH2088
√ zeh — the masculine demonstrative pronoun, this or thatArticlePronounmasculine singular
הַיּ֣וֹםhay·yō·wmdayH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)ArticleNounmasculine singular
yôwm: a day With ʻad and the demonstrative, the standing formula for a condition that has outlived its cause. Pulpit's summary is that it was not a mere temporary, but a permanent, benefit.
כִּדְבַ֥רkiḏ·ḇaraccording to the wordH1697
√ dâbâr — a wordPreposition-kNounmasculine singular construct
dâbâr: a word In construct with Elisha's name and governed by kaph: according to the word of Elisha. Yet v. 21 put the healing in the LORD's mouth in the first person. The narrator credits the prophet with the word precisely because the prophet claimed none of it, which is Gill's point when he adds that it was spoken in the name of the Lord.
אֲשֶׁ֥ר’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
דִּבֵּֽר׃פdib·bêrspokenH1696
√ dâbar — perhaps properly, to arrangeVerbPielPerfectthird person masculine singular
dâbar: to arrange, to speak (Piel) Cognate with the preceding noun. The Masoretic text marks a pe (petuchah) paragraph break immediately after this word, closing the Jericho episode before the Bethel scene begins.
אֱלִישָׁ֖ע’ĕ·lî·šā‘by ElishaH477
√ ʼĔlîyshâʻ — Elisha, the famous prophetNounpropermasculine singular

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. A good seat with death in the water — 2 Kings 2:19

The delegation says two true things and joins them with one waw. The מוֹשַׁב of the city is טוֹב, good, the Genesis verdict word; and the waters are רָעִים, bad, the Genesis antonym. Ellicott gathers the geography (Jericho, the city of palms of Deuteronomy 34:3, rising like an oasis from a broad plain of sand), and Pulpit fills it out from the travelers: palm groves, fig-mulberries, aromatic shrubs, the mountains of Moab in the distance. Cambridge adds that Genesis 13:10 compares this very country to the garden of the LORD, and that people put up with the unwholesomeness for the sake of the trade that came through the Jordan crossing. ⚙ So the complaint is not that Jericho is a bad place. It is that Jericho is a good place that kills, which is a harder thing to live with.

The key is the last word. מְשַׁכָּֽלֶת is a Piel participle of šâkôl, to miscarry or to bereave of children. Barnes translates “and the land apt to miscarry.” Ellicott declares the rendering “barren” an incorrect translation and reads the Piel as either factitive or intensive: the country bears dead births, or the country has many miscarriages. Cambridge cites the Revised Version's and the land miscarrieth and argues from the root that it applies in the first instance rather to deprivation of children than to sterility of soil. K&D dissents on one point only, holding that הארץ means the soil on account of the badness of the water, and rejecting Thenius's reading of it as the inhabitants, man and beast. Whichever way that falls, the word on the page is a womb word. These men have come to a prophet about their children.

ii. The least likely remedy, thrown at the source — 2 Kings 2:20-21

Elisha asks for two things, and the commentators split cleanly over why. Ellicott, Cambridge and Barnes read symbolism: a vessel uncontaminated by use, as at Numbers 19:2 and 2 Samuel 6:3, and salt as the standing Scriptural sign of incorruption, Leviticus 2:13 and Ezekiel 43:24 and Matthew 5:13. Poole and Benson read exclusion: a new vessel so no residue could be suspected and no legal pollution could offend, and salt because salt is the wrong medicine, since it makes waters brackish and lands barren. JFB, crediting Keil, adds the arithmetic: even if salt had the property, a dishful could not purify a whole spring for a day, much less in all future time. ⚙ The two readings are not rivals. The sign had to mean purity and had to be incapable of producing it, or it would not have been a sign at all.

Then the geography of the act. Elisha וַיֵּצֵא֙ goes out to the מוֹצָ֣א, the going-out, of the waters. He does not treat the fields where the miscarriages are counted. He walks up to the head of the stream and וַיַּשְׁלֶךְ־ flings the salt in, a Hiphil of a verb that ordinarily means to throw away. And the word he speaks is not a prayer or a promise but a report: רִפִּ֙אתִי֙, Piel perfect, first person, in the mouth of the LORD. Gill notes that he did not pretend to heal them in his own name. Ellicott says the Divine creative will, not the prophet's power and not the virtue of the salt, was effectual. Cambridge, honestly, admits a gap: we cannot suppose, though no mention is made of it, that the healing was attempted without a calling upon God. That is Cambridge supplying what the text withholds, and saying so.

iii. Unto this day, according to the word — 2 Kings 2:22

The narrator verifies the oracle by repeating its verb in the passive stem: Elisha's LORD said rippîṯî, I have healed, and the narrator writes way·yê·rā·p̄ū, they were healed. Then he dates it, עַ֖ד הַיּ֣וֹם הַזֶּ֑ה, and Cambridge reads that phrase as a seam: a note of a faithful reproduction by the compiler of what was written in some earlier document, the same kind of note he flags at 1 Kings 9:21. Ellicott dates it to the time when the narrative was first committed to writing. ⚙ Read that way, the verse is not claiming that the water is sweet in the reader's own year. It is preserving the testimony of whoever first wrote it down, and the compiler declined to update or delete it.

The later witnesses then pile on, and they should be weighed at their real value. Gill cites Josephus, Maundrell's basin nine or ten paces long, Egmont and Heyman, and Pliny's Calirroe. Barnes, Cambridge, Pulpit and K&D all identify the spot with Ain es Sultan, the one copious source near the ancient site, sweet where the other springs of the Jordan valley are brackish. That a sweet spring has stood near Jericho continuously is well attested. That it is the same water Elisha addressed is inference from location, not from evidence, and the honest form of the claim keeps those two apart. The verse itself ends where it should: כִּדְבַ֥ר ... דִּבֵּֽר, according to the word which he worded. Noun and verb from one root, closing the episode on speech.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ Fallible, offered to be tested. Two details govern this unit, and both cut against the way it is usually preached. First, the disease is named in the vocabulary of the covenant. מְשַׁכָּֽלֶת is the exact word of Exodus 23:26, where the LORD promises that none shall miscarry or be barren in the land, and of Leviticus 26:22 and Hosea 9:14, where the removal of that promise is the shape of judgment. So the men of Jericho are not reporting an inconvenience. They are reporting, without knowing the theology of it, that the covenant blessing has been withdrawn at their spring. Benson and Poole both suspect a curse, from Joshua or from Hiel's rebuilding, and Gill records Abarbinel's objection that if Joshua's curse were the cause the site would never have been reinhabited. The text itself assigns no cause, and neither will I.

Second, the remedy is placed where no one could mistake it for treatment. Elisha does not go to the fields, he goes to the מוֹצָ֣א, the going-out. And what he throws in is the one substance that would make the problem worse. Benson and Poole call it a most improper remedy; Gill relays the Jewish expression that it was a miracle within a miracle. ⚙ I take the point further: the only thing the salt can demonstrate is that the salt did nothing. Take the word away and you have a man ruining a spring. Every element of the scene is arranged so that the healing has one possible author and one possible instrument, and the instrument is speech.

Which is why the closing verse ends on a root repeated twice, dâbâr and dâbar, and why the narrator credits the word to Elisha immediately after Elisha has refused all credit for it. The prophet who claims nothing is the one the narrative names. And the place where a God who has judged chooses to begin again is the source, not the symptom: not the fields where the losses are counted, but the one spring everything downstream is drinking from.

Not a verse, a reading offered to be tested: the salt was chosen because it could not work, so that the word alone would be seen working.

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The word the covenant swore would never be said of Israel verbal / quotation: confirmed

At Exodus 23:26 the LORD promises that none shall miscarry in the land, and at Malachi 3:11 that the vine in the field shall not cast her fruit. The Verifier records šâkôl (H7921) as the shared lexeme in both, the same verb the men of Jericho use of their own ground. Ellicott cites exactly these two references at v. 19. The Verifier confirms the shared lexeme in both directions. ⚙ The force of the link is that Jericho's complaint is phrased, accidentally or not, as a report that a specific covenant clause has failed at a specific address, and the oracle of v. 21 repeals it by name.

Exodus 23:26 · Malachi 3:11

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H7921 šâkôl (in 20 vv), a rare covenant-fertility verb, occurring in 2 Kings 2:19 and 2:21 and in both cited promise texts. No claim of quotation or literary dependence is made; the tier rests on the rarity of the shared lexeme, and Ellicott independently cites both references.

Bereavement as judgment: the curse catalogue structural / thematic: confirmed

The same verb runs the other way through the covenant curses and the prophets: Leviticus 26:22 (wild beasts that shall bereave you of your children), Deuteronomy 32:25, Hosea 9:14, Ezekiel 5:17 and Lamentations 1:20, which pairs šâkôl with מָוֶת mâveth just as 2 Kings 2:21 does. ⚙ I record this as motif, not dependence. The claim is only that Hebrew has a standing register for this loss, that the register is covenantal, and that the Jericho complaint and the Jericho oracle both sit inside it.

Leviticus 26:22 · Hosea 9:14 · Lamentations 1:20 · Ezekiel 5:17

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H7921 šâkôl (in 20 vv) with all four; Lamentations 1:20 additionally shares H4194 mâveth (in 149 vv), matching the death-and-miscarriage pair of 2 Kings 2:21. Downgraded from verbal because the link is a shared curse register, not a citation.

Water healed, marshes given to salt: Ezekiel's inversion structural / thematic: confirmed

Ezekiel 47 sends a river east from the temple to heal a dead sea, and then makes one exception. Ezekiel 47:11 says the miry places and the marshes shall not be healed; they are given to salt. The Verifier records that single verse as sharing two lexemes with our unit: râphâʼ (H7495), the verb of 2 Kings 2:21 and 2:22, and melach (H4417), the word for what Elisha throws. ⚙ Both lexemes turn up in one Ezekiel verse, with their roles reversed. At Jericho salt is the sign of healing; in Ezekiel salt is what is left where healing is withheld. The observation is real and the shared vocabulary is computed, but no literary dependence is claimed in either direction, and I have not tiered this verbal.

Ezekiel 47:11

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H4417 melach (in 26 vv) and H7495 râphâʼ (in 62 vv). Two shared lexemes in one verse, but the relation is inverted usage within a shared water-healing motif, not quotation; tiered structural deliberately.

Jericho and its curse: a link the commentators themselves dispute flagged: verify source

Benson, Poole and Gill all raise Joshua's curse on the rebuilder of Jericho (Joshua 6:26, executed on Hiel at 1 Kings 16:34) as a candidate cause for the bad water. Benson and Poole leave it open, either when Joshua first took it or afterwards when Hiel rebuilt it. Gill records Abarbinel's view that it dated from Joshua, and then answers it: if so, the site would not have been inhabited again. ⚙ Our text names no cause at all. This is flagged, not because the verses do not exist, but because the connection between them is a commentator's inference that other commentators reject.

Joshua 6:26 · 1 Kings 16:34

basis: No Verifier lexeme basis was computed for this pair; the link is an inference offered by Benson, Poole and Gill and contested within Gill's own note (Abarbinel). 2 Kings 2:19 assigns no cause to the bad water.

A useless material and a real word: the prophetic sign-act structural / thematic: confirmed

Poole gathers the parallels himself at v. 21: the tree cast into the bitter water at Marah (Exodus 15:25), the meal cast into the deadly pot (2 Kings 4:41), the stick cast in to raise the iron (2 Kings 6:6). ⚙ In all four the verb is one of casting, the material is inadequate or contrary to the result, and the effect follows a word. The pattern is the point; the shared vocabulary across all four has not been computed here, so this stands as motif.

Exodus 15:25 · 2 Kings 4:41 · 2 Kings 6:6

basis: No Verifier lexeme basis computed for these pairs. The recorded basis is the shared sign-act pattern (inadequate material cast in, effect follows the word), named as a group by Poole in his note on 2 Kings 2:21. No quotation claimed.

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

Salt and the clean vessel ancient/widely-held

Barnes reads the new dish and the salt as chosen for symbolism, the salt being a common Scriptural symbol of incorruption, and cites Leviticus 2:13, Ezekiel 43:24 and Matthew 5:13 in one breath. Pulpit says the same and extends it: under the Law every offering was to be salted, and the same symbolism is still employed under the gospel, at Matthew 5:13, Mark 9:49 and Luke 14:34. Cambridge takes the vessel the same way, its purity and freshness typifying the purification wrought upon the spring. ⚙ Read forward, the pattern is not that salt is a nice metaphor for disciples, but that the Lord's chosen instrument for arresting corruption is always something set apart and small dropped into something large and spoiling, and that it works by what it signifies rather than by what it contains. Henry's whole reading of the unit is this: the salt is like the word of God, and the miracle is an apt emblem of the effect produced by the grace of God on the sinful heart of man.

Leviticus 2:13 · Matthew 5:13 · Mark 9:49-50 · Luke 14:34

Healed at the source, not the symptom novel

Elisha walks past every field where the losses are counted and goes to the מוֹצָ֣א, the going-out of the waters. ⚙ The New Testament's water sayings sit on the same instinct. Christ tells the woman at the well that the water he gives becomes a spring welling up (John 4:14), and the last vision of Scripture puts a river proceeding from the throne with leaves for the healing of the nations (Revelation 22:1-2), which is Ezekiel 47 carried to its end. The figure is real and the vocabulary of healing waters is genuinely shared, but these are Greek texts and no shared Strong's lexeme can be claimed across the Testaments; this is read as figure, not as citation, and I hold it loosely.

John 4:13-14 · Revelation 22:1-2 · Ezekiel 47:11

A word spoken in the perfect, before anything is seen novel

רִפִּ֙אתִי֙ is a perfect: I have healed, said over water that still tasted of death. The narrator then reports the Nifal, they were healed, and credits it to the word which was spoken. ⚙ That is the grammar of the centurion's request, only say the word and my servant shall be healed (Matthew 8:8), and of the nobleman at Capernaum who believed the word Jesus had spoken to him and went his way before he had any report (John 4:50). Ellicott's phrase for the Jericho miracle, the Divine creative will, is the right category: a healing that is complete at the moment it is declared. The apostolic writers make Christ the one through whom that word is spoken (Hebrews 1:2); applying the figure to this particular spring is my reading, not a claim about what Kings itself intends.

Matthew 8:8 · John 4:50 · Hebrews 1:2

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

Text: the Hebrew is untroubled here, but two places are worth recording. At 2 Kings 2:21 Ellicott reports that many manuscripts and all the versions except the Septuagint read “and there shall not be,” adding the conjunction; the BSB follows the shorter reading. The Septuagint's rendering of the v. 19 participle as ἀτεκνουμένη (childless-making) is noted by Pulpit and supports the miscarriage sense against “barren ground.” K&D judges מְשַׁכֶּלֶת in v. 21 to be a substantive, and Ellicott independently says it is apparently used as a substantive here; the BSB's “unfruitfulness” reflects that judgment while losing the root.

Translation: the single largest divergence in this unit is the rendering of šâkôl (H7921) as barrenness rather than miscarriage. Ellicott calls the older rendering incorrect, Cambridge prefers the Revised Version's “miscarrieth,” and Barnes translates “apt to miscarry.” The FSSB literal follows them. צְלֹחִ֣ית (v. 20) occurs nowhere else in the Hebrew Bible, so “bowl,” “dish,” “cup” and “cruse” are all guesses; Ellicott compares a related form at 2 Chronicles 35:16 and the Targum, which is the best evidence available and is not much.

Sources: Henry's entry covers 2 Kings 2:19 to 2:25 as one block, so his sentences here are about the whole chapter-end, including the Bethel judgment that our unit does not contain. The K&D entry supplied in this brief begins with the search for Elijah in vv. 16 to 18 and is capped before its geographical note on Ain es Sultan ends; quotations from it are taken from the portion supplied. The JFB entry on 2 Kings 2:21 in the source is a repeat of its note on v. 20 and is cited here at v. 20 only. Poole has no note on v. 22.

Uncertain: no commentator can say what was actually wrong with the water, and neither can this synthesis. The identification of the healed spring with Ain es Sultan is topographical inference shared by Barnes, Cambridge, Pulpit and K&D, not a claim the Hebrew makes. The later testimonies Gill assembles (Josephus, Pliny, Maundrell, Egmont and Heyman) establish that a good spring has long stood there; they cannot establish that it is this one. The cause of the curse, whether Joshua's word, Hiel's rebuilding, or nothing stated, is disputed among the sources themselves and is left open here.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)