The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

2 Kings23:21–27

Josiah Restores the Passover

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

2 Kings 23:21–27 — Josiah Restores the Passover. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

21

The king commanded all the people, “Keep the Passover of the LORD your God, as it is written in this Book of the Covenant.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ham·me·leḵ ’eṯ- way·ṣaw kāl- hā·‘ām lê·mōr ‘ă·śū p̄e·saḥ Yah·weh ’ĕ·lō·hê·ḵem kak·kā·ṯūḇ ‘al haz·zeh sê·p̄er hab·bə·rîṯ

Word by word15 · parsed
הַמֶּ֙לֶךְ֙ham·me·leḵThe kingH4428
√ melek — a kingArticleNounmasculine singular
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
וַיְצַ֤וway·ṣawcommandedH6680
√ tsâvâh — (intensively) to constitute, enjoinConjunctive wawVerbPielConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
tsâvâh: to constitute, enjoin (Piel) The verb of covenant charge, the same stem used of God charging Moses. A king enjoining Passover is doing something formally odd: the feast was already commanded from Sinai. The decree is therefore not legislation but restoration, the civil arm putting behind an ordinance that had never been repealed and had simply stopped being obeyed exactly.
כָּל־kāl-allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
הָעָ֣םhā·‘āmthe peopleH5971
√ ʻam — a people (as a congregated unit)ArticleNounmasculine singular
לֵאמֹ֔רlê·mōr. . .H559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Preposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
עֲשׂ֣וּ‘ă·śūKeepH6213
√ ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest applicationVerbQalImperativemasculine plural
ʻâsâh: to do or make (Qal imperative, m. pl.) Plural, addressed to all the people, not to the priesthood. The Passover in Exodus 12 is a household rite before it is a temple rite, and Josiah's imperative reaches every house. Both following verses report the outcome in the passive of this same verb, so that v. 21 to v. 23 form a single command-and-completion unit sealed by one root.
פֶ֔סַחp̄e·saḥthe PassoverH6453
√ peçach — a pretermission, iNounmasculine singular
peçach: a pretermission, a passing over Strong's glosses the noun by its causal event, the passing-over of the destroyer, so the feast is named for an act of divine restraint rather than for deliverance in the abstract. Note the absence of the article: a Passover, an occurrence of the thing, which is exactly Ellicott's rendering, "Hold a passover"; the definite "this Passover" appears only in v. 23, after the event has become historic. Pulpit locates the governing statutes precisely, Exodus 12:3 to 20 and 13:5 to 10 for the ordinance itself, Deuteronomy 16:1 to 8 "with much less fullness," and infers that the scroll Hilkiah found "must, therefore, certainly have contained Exodus."
לַֽיהוָ֖הYah·wehof the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
אֱלֹֽהֵיכֶ֑ם’ĕ·lō·hê·ḵemyour GodH430
√ ʼĕlôhîym — gods in the ordinary senseNounmasculine plural constructsecond person masculine plural
כַּכָּת֕וּבkak·kā·ṯūḇas [it is] writtenH3789
√ kâthab — to grave, by implication, to write (describe, inscribe, prescribe, subscribe)Preposition-k, ArticleVerbQalQalPassParticiplemasculine singular
kâthab: to grave, to write, to inscribe A passive participle, so no writer is named in the clause itself; the authority is the writtenness of the thing. This is the hinge of the entire Josianic reform as Kings tells it: a found text becomes the measure of a living practice. Cambridge draws the consequence, that "whatever may have come to be the manner of celebration from long usage" must now yield to "the authoritative book, recently brought to light."
עַ֛ל‘alinH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
הַזֶּֽה׃haz·zehthisH2088
√ zeh — the masculine demonstrative pronoun, this or thatArticlePronounmasculine singular
zeh: this (masculine demonstrative) Grammatically decisive: masculine, hence attached to the masculine sêpher. The covenant is not "this covenant" as opposed to some other; the scroll is "this scroll" as opposed to whatever else the priests had been using.
סֵ֥פֶרsê·p̄erBookH5612
√ çêpher — properly, writing (the art or a document)Nounmasculine singular construct
הַבְּרִ֖יתhab·bə·rîṯof the CovenantH1285
√ bᵉrîyth — a compact (because made by passing between pieces of flesh)ArticleNounfeminine singular
bᵉrîyth: a compact, a covenant Strong's derives the noun from the rite of passing between severed flesh. The book that names the covenant is the book that commands the Passover, and both hang on blood and on a passing-through. Benson reads the feast the same way, as "a token of their being dedicated to him who brought them out, and of their communion with him."
22

No such Passover had been observed from the days of the judges who had governed Israel through all the days of the kings of Israel and Judah.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

kî lō haz·zeh kap·pe·saḥ na·‘ă·śāh mî·mê haš·šō·p̄ə·ṭîm ’ă·šer šā·p̄ə·ṭū ’eṯ- yiś·rā·’êl wə·ḵōl yə·mê mal·ḵê yiś·rā·’êl ū·mal·ḵê yə·hū·ḏāh

Word by word17 · parsed
כִּ֣יH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
לֹ֤אNoH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absAdverbNegative particle
Simple negation; its scope is the comparison, not the event.
הַזֶּ֔הhaz·zehsuchH2088
√ zeh — the masculine demonstrative pronoun, this or thatArticlePronounmasculine singular
כַּפֶּ֣סַחkap·pe·saḥPassoverH6453
√ peçach — a pretermission, iPreposition-k, ArticleNounmasculine singular
peçach: the Passover (with prefixed k- of comparison) The comparative particle is the interpretive fulcrum of the verse, and every careful commentator in the brief leans on it. Cambridge: the verse "cannot be tortured into the meaning" that the feast had lapsed entirely. Pulpit names two Passovers still on record within the disputed span, Joshua 5:10 to 11 and 2 Chronicles 30:13 to 26. The historian is grading a celebration, not reporting a first.
נַֽעֲשָׂה֙na·‘ă·śāhhad been observedH6213
√ ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest applicationVerbNifalPerfectthird person masculine singular
ʻâsâh: to do or make (Niphal, passive) The passive removes the human subject and leaves only the deed. Because v. 21 used the active imperative of the same root, vv. 21 to 23 read as command, verdict on the past, and dated fulfilment, all bound by ʻâsâh.
מִימֵי֙mî·mêfrom the daysH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)Preposition-mNounmasculine plural construct
הַשֹּׁ֣פְטִ֔יםhaš·šō·p̄ə·ṭîmof the judgesH8199
√ shâphaṭ — to judge, iArticleVerbQalParticiplemasculine plural
shâphaṭ: to judge, to govern Used twice in two words, participle then perfect. The era of the judges is the Deuteronomistic historian's standing byword for covenant drift (Judges 2:10, cited by Cambridge in this very connection), so to reach back past every king to that period is to say the exact keeping of this feast is older than the monarchy and has outlived its neglect.
אֲשֶׁ֥ר’ă·šerwhoH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
שָׁפְט֖וּšā·p̄ə·ṭūhad governedH8199
√ shâphaṭ — to judge, iVerbQalPerfectthird person common plural
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
יִשְׂרָאֵ֑לyiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
וְכֹ֗לwə·ḵōlthrough allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeConjunctive wawNounmasculine singular construct
יְמֵ֛יyə·mêthe daysH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)Nounmasculine plural construct
מַלְכֵ֥יmal·ḵêof the kingsH4428
√ melek — a kingNounmasculine plural construct
יִשְׂרָאֵ֖לyiś·rā·’êlof IsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
וּמַלְכֵ֥יū·mal·ḵê. . .H4428
√ melek — a kingConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural construct
יְהוּדָֽה׃yə·hū·ḏāhand JudahH3063
√ Yᵉhûwdâh — Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉhûwdâh: Judah The pairing "kings of Israel and kings of Judah" sweeps both halves of the divided monarchy into one indictment. Gill notes the asymmetry honestly: the northern kings "kept it not" at all, while in Judah it was kept, but under Hezekiah "not universally, and by some in their uncleanness."
23

But in the eighteenth year of Josiah’s reign, this Passover was observed to the LORD in Jerusalem.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

kî ’im- biš·mō·neh ‘eś·rêh šā·nāh yō·šî·yā·hū lam·me·leḵ haz·zeh hap·pe·saḥ na·‘ă·śāh Yah·weh bî·rū·šā·lim

Word by word12 · parsed
כִּ֗יButH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
kîy: for, except, but rather (with ’im) The pair kî ’im is one of Hebrew's sharpest exceptive constructions. Placed immediately after the sweeping denial of v. 22, it functions as the single named exception to centuries, which is why Cambridge says "the writer wishes to say emphatically when this strict observance of the passover took place."
אִם־’im-. . .H518
√ ʼim — used very widely as demonstrative, lo!Conjunction
בִּשְׁמֹנֶ֤הbiš·mō·nehin the eighteenthH8083
√ shᵉmôneh — a cardinal number, eight (as if a surplus above the 'perfect' seven)Preposition-bNumberfeminine singular
shᵉmôneh: eight Strong's notes the ancient sense of eight "as if a surplus above the perfect seven." The eighteenth year is the year of the temple repair and of Hilkiah's find (2 Kings 22:3), so the dating ties book, building and feast into one twelve-month span.
עֶשְׂרֵה֙‘eś·rêh. . .H6240
√ ʻâsâr — ten (only in combination), iNumberfeminine singular
שָׁנָ֔הšā·nāhyearH8141
√ shâneh — a year (as a revolution of time)Nounfeminine singular
יֹֽאשִׁיָּ֑הוּyō·šî·yā·hūof Josiah’sH2977
√ Yôʼshîyâh — Joshijah, the name of two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
לַמֶּ֖לֶךְlam·me·leḵreignH4428
√ melek — a kingPreposition-l, ArticleNounmasculine singular
הַזֶּ֛הhaz·zehthisH2088
√ zeh — the masculine demonstrative pronoun, this or thatArticlePronounmasculine singular
הַפֶּ֧סַחhap·pe·saḥPassoverH6453
√ peçach — a pretermission, iArticleNounmasculine singular
peçach: the Passover (definite) The article plus demonstrative fixes the referent as a historical singularity. Gill draws the practical inference from the date: since the feast falls on the fourteenth of the first month, the entire purge of chapter 23 had to be crowded into the opening weeks of that year.
נַעֲשָׂ֞הna·‘ă·śāhwas observedH6213
√ ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest applicationVerbNifalPerfectthird person masculine singular
ʻâsâh: to do or make (Niphal, passive) The third and final occurrence of the root in three verses, and the only one with a date attached. Command (v. 21), verdict (v. 22), fulfilment (v. 23).
לַיהוָ֖הYah·wehto the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉhôvâh: the LORD With the prefixed l-: the feast is done to Him, dative, not merely about Him. The same preposition and name stood in the command of v. 21, so the obedience is reported in the exact terms of the charge.
בִּירוּשָׁלִָֽם׃bî·rū·šā·limin JerusalemH3389
√ Yᵉrûwshâlaim — Jerushalaim or Jerushalem, the capital city of PalestinePreposition-bNounproperfeminine singular
24

Furthermore, Josiah removed the mediums and spiritists, the household gods and idols, and all the abominations that were seen in the land of Judah and in Jerusalem. He did this to carry out the words of the law written in the book that Hilkiah the priest had found in the house of the LORD.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·ḡam ’eṯ- yō·šî·yā·hū bi·‘êr hā·’ō·ḇō·wṯ wə·’eṯ- hay·yid·də·‘ō·nîm wə·’eṯ- hat·tə·rā·p̄îm wə·’eṯ- hag·gil·lu·lîm wə·’êṯ kāl- haš·šiq·qu·ṣîm ’ă·šer nir·’ū bə·’e·reṣ yə·hū·ḏāh ū·ḇî·rū·šā·lim lə·ma·‘an hā·qîm ’eṯ- diḇ·rê hat·tō·w·rāh hak·kə·ṯu·ḇîm ‘al- has·sê·p̄er ’ă·šer ḥil·qî·yā·hū hak·kō·hên mā·ṣā bêṯ Yah·weh

Word by word33 · parsed
וְגַ֣םwə·ḡamFurthermoreH1571
√ gam — properly, assemblageConjunction
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
יֹֽאשִׁיָּ֑הוּyō·šî·yā·hūJosiahH2977
√ Yôʼshîyâh — Joshijah, the name of two IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
בִּעֵ֖רbi·‘êrremovedH1197
√ bâʻar — to kindle, iVerbPielPerfectthird person masculine singular
bâʻar: to kindle, to burn, to consume away The intensive stem of a fire word, set inside a chapter already full of literal burning (vv. 4 to 20). The one verb holds both the physical pyres and the legal formula "so shalt thou put the evil away from the midst of thee." K&D summarise the whole action with the stronger English word: Josiah "did also exterminate the necromancers, the teraphim and all the abominations of idolatry."
הָאֹב֣וֹתhā·’ō·ḇō·wṯthe mediumsH178
√ ʼôwb — properly, a mumble, iArticleNounmasculine plural
ʼôwb: properly, a mumble, a necromancer Strong's derivation is acoustic: the muttering of the medium, or the spirit-voice itself. The word is rare (16 verses in the canon) and it is paired with yiddᵉʻônîy almost every time it appears, which is why the Verifier's cross-reference list for this unit is dominated by that pair. Manasseh had installed exactly these (2 Kings 21:6); his grandson burns them out.
וְאֶת־wə·’eṯ-andH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
הַ֠יִּדְּעֹנִיםhay·yid·də·‘ō·nîmspiritistsH3049
√ yiddᵉʻônîy — properly, a knowing oneArticleNounmasculine plural
yiddᵉʻônîy: properly, a knowing one Rarer still, 11 verses in all, and formed from the root "to know." The irony is built into the vocabulary: the knowing-ones are purged in the same act by which the king establishes the words of a book that was lost and had to be found.
וְאֶת־wə·’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
הַתְּרָפִ֨יםhat·tə·rā·p̄îmthe household godsH8655
√ tᵉrâphîym — Teraphim (singular or plural) a family idolArticleNounmasculine plural
tᵉrâphîym: a family idol (singular or plural) Household gods, and the most domestic of the items listed. K&D gloss them as "penates, domestic gods, which were worshipped as the authors of earthly prosperity and as oracular deities." Cambridge traces the long thread: Rachel steals them (Genesis 31:19), Micah makes them (Judges 17:5), Michal beds one to cover David's escape. This is not state religion; it is what people keep on a shelf.
וְאֶת־wə·’eṯ-andH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
הַגִּלֻּלִ֜יםhag·gil·lu·lîmidolsH1544
√ gillûwl — properly, a log (as round)ArticleNounmasculine plural
gillûwl: idols, properly a log or round thing A word of open derision, heavily favoured by Ezekiel. Pulpit suggests these, like the teraphim, are "of a private nature, figures used as amulets or talismans." The reform reaches from the temple courts to the amulet in a pocket.
וְאֵ֣תwə·’êṯH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
כָּל־kāl-and allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
הַשִּׁקֻּצִ֗יםhaš·šiq·qu·ṣîmthe abominationsH8251
√ shiqqûwts — disgusting, iArticleNounmasculine plural
shiqqûwts: disgusting, detestable The generic catch-all, placed after the specific terms and under kol, "all." K&D note that gillulim and shiqqutsim are joined "as a contemptuous description of idols in general." We flag their appeal to Deuteronomy 29:16 in the threads below, because we could not verify the shared lexeme.
אֲשֶׁ֤ר’ă·šerthatH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
נִרְאוּ֙nir·’ūwere seenH7200
√ râʼâh — to see, literally or figuratively (in numerous applications, direct and implied, transitive, intransitive and causative)VerbNifalPerfectthird person common plural
râʼâh: to see (Niphal, passive) A passive of sight, with no seer named. Pulpit takes "the abominations that were spied" to mean "secret defilements and superstitious practices in households, which needed to be searched out." Poole adds that some had been actively hidden by "their priests or zealots." The verse therefore records a search, and searches miss things.
בְּאֶ֤רֶץbə·’e·reṣin the landH776
√ ʼerets — the earth (at large, or partitively a land)Preposition-bNounfeminine singular construct
יְהוּדָה֙yə·hū·ḏāhof JudahH3063
√ Yᵉhûwdâh — Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וּבִיר֣וּשָׁלִַ֔םū·ḇî·rū·šā·limand in JerusalemH3389
√ Yᵉrûwshâlaim — Jerushalaim or Jerushalem, the capital city of PalestineConjunctive waw, Preposition-bNounproperfeminine singular
לְ֠מַעַןlə·ma·‘anHe did thisH4616
√ maʻan — properly, heed, iConjunction
הָקִ֞יםhā·qîmto carry outH6965
√ qûwm — to rise (in various applications, literal, figurative, intensive and causative)VerbHifilInfinitive construct
qûwm: to rise, to cause to stand (Hiphil) The theological centre of the verse. Josiah is not performing a rite; he is standing a text back up on its feet. The purpose clause lᵉmaʻan (H4616, "to the intent") makes the whole purge instrumental to the establishing of written words, which is the Deuteronomistic thesis of these chapters in a single infinitive.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
דִּבְרֵ֤יdiḇ·rêthe wordsH1697
√ dâbâr — a wordNounmasculine plural construct
הַתּוֹרָה֙hat·tō·w·rāhof the lawH8451
√ tôwrâh — a precept or statute, especially the Decalogue or PentateuchArticleNounfeminine singular
tôwrâh: a precept or statute, especially the Pentateuch Here "the words of the Torah written upon the book." Kings never quotes the scroll; it only measures by it. Cambridge infers its contents from the uses made of it: threatenings such as Deuteronomy carries, idolatry statutes such as Leviticus carries, and Passover ordinances such as Exodus and Numbers carry.
הַכְּתֻבִ֣יםhak·kə·ṯu·ḇîmwrittenH3789
√ kâthab — to grave, by implication, to write (describe, inscribe, prescribe, subscribe)ArticleVerbQalQalPassParticiplemasculine plural
עַל־‘al-inH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
הַסֵּ֔פֶרhas·sê·p̄erthe bookH5612
√ çêpher — properly, writing (the art or a document)ArticleNounmasculine singular
אֲשֶׁ֥ר’ă·šerthatH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
חִלְקִיָּ֥הוּḥil·qî·yā·hūHilkiahH2518
√ Chilqîyâh — Chilhijah, the name of eight IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
הַכֹּהֵ֖ןhak·kō·hênthe priestH3548
√ kôhên — literally one officiating, a priestArticleNounmasculine singular
מָצָ֛אmā·ṣāhad foundH4672
√ mâtsâʼ — properly, to come forth to, iVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
mâtsâʼ: to find, to come forth to The verb that governs the whole reform. Everything Josiah destroys, and everything he establishes, hangs grammatically on a relative clause about a priest finding something. Ellicott, on v. 21, names the book as that "which gave the impulse to the whole reforming movement."
בֵּ֥יתbêṯin the houseH1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcNounmasculine singular construct
יְהוָֽה׃Yah·wehof the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
25

Neither before nor after Josiah was there any king like him, who turned to the LORD with all his heart and with all his soul and with all his strength, according to all the Law of Moses.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

lō- lə·p̄ā·nāw lō- wə·’a·ḥă·rāw kā·mō·hū qām hā·yāh me·leḵ wə·ḵā·mō·hū ’ă·šer- šāḇ ’el- Yah·weh bə·ḵāl lə·ḇā·ḇōw ū·ḇə·ḵāl nap̄·šōw ū·ḇə·ḵāl mə·’ō·ḏōw kə·ḵōl tō·w·raṯ mō·šeh

Word by word22 · parsed
לֹֽא־lō-NeitherH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absAdverbNegative particle
לְפָנָ֜יוlə·p̄ā·nāwbeforeH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Preposition-lNouncommon plural constructthird person masculine singular
לֹֽא־lō-norH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absAdverbNegative particle
וְאַחֲרָ֖יוwə·’a·ḥă·rāwafter [Josiah]H310
√ ʼachar — properly, the hind partConjunctive wawPrepositionthird person masculine singular
כָּמֹֽהוּ׃kā·mō·hūH3644
√ kᵉmôw — a form of the prefix 'k-', but used separately as, thus, soPrepositionthird person masculine singular
קָ֥םqāmH6965
√ qûwm — to rise (in various applications, literal, figurative, intensive and causative)VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
qûwm: to rise, to arise Paired with hāqîm in v. 24 by root, and pointed forward by Pulpit's dry observation that the praise is "but moderate," since the four kings who followed, Jehoahaz, Jehoiakim, Jehoiachin and Zedekiah, "were, one and all, wicked princes."
הָיָ֨הhā·yāhwas thereH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
מֶ֗לֶךְme·leḵany kingH4428
√ melek — a kingNounmasculine singular
וְכָמֹהוּ֩wə·ḵā·mō·hūlike himH3644
√ kᵉmôw — a form of the prefix 'k-', but used separately as, thus, soConjunctive wawPrepositionthird person masculine singular
The comparative kᵉmôw with suffix, "like him," bracketing the verse at both ends.
אֲשֶׁר־’ă·šer-whoH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
שָׁ֤בšāḇturnedH7725
√ shûwb — to turn back (hence, away) transitively or intransitively, literally or figuratively (not necessarily with the idea of return to the starting point)VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
shûwb: to turn back, to return The classic prophetic verb for repentance, and the hinge of the whole unit. Josiah is the only king in Kings of whom this specific formula is used with the triple "all." It is set down here precisely so that v. 26 can deny the same verb to God: the deepest human turning in the book of Kings does not turn the LORD.
אֶל־’el-toH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPreposition
יְהוָה֙Yah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
בְּכָל־bə·ḵālwith allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholePreposition-bNounmasculine singular construct
לְבָב֤וֹlə·ḇā·ḇōwhis heartH3824
√ lêbâb — the heart (as the most interior organ)Nounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
lêbâb: the heart, as the most interior organ The first term of the Deuteronomy 6:5 triad. In Hebrew anthropology the lêbâb is the seat of will and reasoning, not sentiment, so to turn with all the heart is to have no reserved compartment of intention. The tragedy of v. 26 is that Josiah's lêbâb was not the nation's.
וּבְכָל־ū·ḇə·ḵāland with allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeConjunctive waw, Preposition-bNounmasculine singular construct
נַפְשׁוֹ֙nap̄·šōwhis soulH5315
√ nephesh — properly, a breathing creature, iNounfeminine singular constructthird person masculine singular
nephesh: a breathing creature, life, soul The second term. Strong's grounds it in breath and living appetite; it is the self as a wanting, living thing. Jeremiah's verdict on Josiah, which both Ellicott and K&D cite (Jeremiah 22:15 to 16), fills this out concretely: he judged the cause of the poor and needy, and "was not this to know me? saith the LORD."
וּבְכָל־ū·ḇə·ḵāland with allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeConjunctive waw, Preposition-bNounmasculine singular construct
מְאֹד֔וֹmə·’ō·ḏōwhis strengthH3966
√ mᵉʼôd — properly, vehemence, iAdverbthird person masculine singular
mᵉʼôd: properly, vehemence, muchness The third and strangest term, an adverb pressed into service as a noun. Pulpit reads the triad as designedly total: "intended to include the whole moral and mental nature of man, all the energies of his understanding, his will, and his physical vitality." Deuteronomy is quoted back at a king who obeyed it more exactly than any other, and it still is not enough to save the nation.
כְּכֹ֖לkə·ḵōlaccording to allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholePreposition-kNounmasculine singular construct
תּוֹרַ֣תtō·w·raṯthe LawH8451
√ tôwrâh — a precept or statute, especially the Decalogue or PentateuchNounfeminine singular construct
tôwrâh: law, precept In construct with Moses: the standard is not piety in general but a named, written code. Ellicott concedes the friction with 2 Kings 18:5, where Hezekiah receives a similar superlative, and answers it honestly: "A writer would not be careful to measure his words by the rule of strict proportion in such cases."
מֹשֶׁ֑הmō·šehof MosesH4872
√ Môsheh — Mosheh, the Israelite lawgiverNounpropermasculine singular
26

Nevertheless, the LORD did not turn away from the fury of His burning anger, which was kindled against Judah because of all that Manasseh had done to provoke Him to anger.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

’aḵ Yah·weh lō- šāḇ mê·ḥă·rō·wn hag·gā·ḏō·wl ’ap·pōw ’ă·šer- ḥā·rāh ’ap·pōw bî·hū·ḏāh ‘al kāl- ’ă·šer mə·naš·šeh hak·kə·‘ā·sîm hiḵ·‘î·sōw

Word by word17 · parsed
אַ֣ךְ׀’aḵNeverthelessH389
√ ʼak — a particle of affirmation, surelyAdverb
ʼak: surely, only, howbeit A one-syllable restrictive adverb that reverses the direction of the whole unit. Everything from v. 21 has been ascent: command obeyed, feast unmatched, king unequalled. ʼak is where the narrative turns its face toward 2 Kings 25.
יְהוָ֗הYah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
לֹֽא־lō-did notH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absAdverbNegative particle
שָׁ֣בšāḇturn awayH7725
√ shûwb — to turn back (hence, away) transitively or intransitively, literally or figuratively (not necessarily with the idea of return to the starting point)VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
shûwb: to turn back (Qal perfect, negated) The single most important word in the unit, because it is borrowed from v. 25 and negated. The book of Kings will not let repentance be transactional: the most complete turning it records does not compel a turning in God. Gill locates the reason in the people rather than in Josiah, citing Jeremiah 3:10, that Judah turned "not with their whole heart, but feignedly."
מֵחֲר֤וֹןmê·ḥă·rō·wnfrom the furyH2740
√ chârôwn — a burning of angerPreposition-mNounmasculine singular construct
chârôwn: a burning of anger A noun built from the fire-verb that follows it, and qualified by haggādôl, "the great." Hebrew piles the figure deliberately: the burning of his nose, the great, wherewith his nose burned. Judgment here is not caprice but heat that has been building since chapter 21.
הַגָּד֔וֹלhag·gā·ḏō·wlof His burningH1419
√ gâdôwl — great (in any sense)ArticleAdjectivemasculine singular
אַפּוֹ֙’ap·pōwangerH639
√ ʼaph — properly, the nose or nostrilNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
אֲשֶׁר־’ă·šer-whichH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
חָרָ֥הḥā·rāhwas kindledH2734
√ chârâh — to glow or grow warmVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
chârâh: to glow or grow warm The cognate verb, giving the verse its internal rhyme of noun and verb. English cannot easily carry it; Ellicott's paraphrase comes nearest.
אַפּ֖וֹ’ap·pōw. . .H639
√ ʼaph — properly, the nose or nostrilNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
בִּֽיהוּדָ֑הbî·hū·ḏāhagainst JudahH3063
√ Yᵉhûwdâh — Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five IsraelitesPreposition-bNounpropermasculine singular
עַ֚ל‘albecause ofH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
כָּל־kāl-allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
אֲשֶׁ֥ר’ă·šerthatH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
מְנַשֶּֽׁה׃mə·naš·šehManassehH4519
√ Mᵉnashsheh — Menashsheh, a grandson of Jacob, also the tribe descended from him, and its territoryNounpropermasculine singular
Mᵉnashsheh: Manasseh The grandfather named as cause, two generations back and long dead. K&D note that Kings does this three times, here and at 2 Kings 24:3 and Jeremiah 15:4. The point is not vendetta but the structure of corporate sin: Pulpit puts it that the judgment was "rendered necessary by the actual condition of the nation, the condition whereto it had been reduced by Manasseh's evil doings."
הַכְּעָסִ֔יםhak·kə·‘ā·sîmhad doneH3708
√ kaʻaç — vexationArticleNounmasculine plural
הִכְעִיס֖וֹhiḵ·‘î·sōwto provoke Him to angerH3707
√ kaʻaç — to troubleVerbHifilPerfectthird person masculine singularthird person masculine singular
kaʻaç: to trouble, to provoke to anger (Hiphil) Causative, with the object suffix "him": Manasseh made God grieve. The preceding word is the cognate plural noun hakkᵉʻāsîm, "the provocations," so the clause reads "all the provocations wherewith he provoked him." Benson refuses the easy protest that sons are punished for fathers, and grounds the justice in the present generation: "these men had never sincerely repented of their own nor of their fathers' sins."
27

For the LORD had said, “I will remove Judah from My sight, just as I removed Israel. I will reject this city Jerusalem, which I chose, and the temple of which I said, ‘My Name shall be there.’”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

Yah·weh way·yō·mer gam ’eṯ- ’ā·sîr yə·hū·ḏāh mê·‘al pā·nay ka·’ă·šer hă·si·rō·ṯî ’eṯ- yiś·rā·’êl ū·mā·’as·tî ’eṯ- haz·zōṯ hā·‘îr yə·rū·šā·lim wə·’eṯ- ’ă·šer- bā·ḥar·tî ’eṯ- hab·ba·yiṯ ’ă·šer ’ā·mar·tî šə·mî yih·yeh šām

Word by word27 · parsed
יְהוָ֗הYah·wehFor the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֹּ֣אמֶרway·yō·merhad saidH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
ʼâmar: to say Consecutive imperfect, with no messenger formula and no prophet named. K&D take it as "the divine decree, which was announced to the people by the prophets, especially Jeremiah and Zephaniah."
גַּ֤םgamI willH1571
√ gam — properly, assemblageConjunction
The particle gam, "also," which does the comparative work: Judah is added to Israel's sentence.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
אָסִיר֙’ā·sîrremoveH5493
√ çûwr — to turn off (literal or figurative)VerbHifilImperfectfirst person common singular
çûwr: to turn off (Hiphil, causative) Used twice in the verse, imperfect then perfect: what God will do to Judah He has already done to Israel. The verb of reform becomes the verb of exile. 2 Kings 17:23 uses it of the northern deportation, and K&D cross-reference that passage here.
יְהוּדָה֙yə·hū·ḏāhJudahH3063
√ Yᵉhûwdâh — Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
מֵעַ֣לmê·‘alfromH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition-m
פָּנַ֔יpā·nayMy sightH6440
√ pânîym — the face (as the part that turns)Nounmasculine plural constructfirst person common singular
pânîym: the face, as the part that turns Strong's derivation is itself the point: the face is the turning part. In three consecutive verses the same root network governs everything. Josiah turned (šûb) to the LORD; the LORD did not turn; now He turns Judah aside (sûr) from His face (pānîm). The unit is built on turning.
כַּאֲשֶׁ֥רka·’ă·šerjust asH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPreposition-kPronounrelative
הֲסִרֹ֖תִיhă·si·rō·ṯîI removedH5493
√ çûwr — to turn off (literal or figurative)VerbHifilPerfectfirst person common singular
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
יִשְׂרָאֵ֑לyiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
וּ֠מָאַסְתִּיū·mā·’as·tîI will rejectH3988
√ mâʼaç — to spurnConjunctive wawVerbQalConjunctive perfectfirst person common singular
mâʼaç: to spurn, to reject A relatively uncommon verb (69 verses) and a violent one; it is what Israel did to the LORD in 1 Samuel 8:7 and what the builders did to the stone in Psalm 118:22. Here God uses it of a city He Himself chose, which is the sharpest thing in the verse.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
הַזֹּ֤אתhaz·zōṯthisH2063
√ zôʼth — this (often used adverb)ArticlePronounfeminine singular
הָעִ֨ירhā·‘îrcityH5892
√ ʻîyr — a city (a place guarded by waking or a watch) in the widest sense (even of a mere encampment or post)ArticleNounfeminine singular
יְר֣וּשָׁלִַ֔םyə·rū·šā·limJerusalemH3389
√ Yᵉrûwshâlaim — Jerushalaim or Jerushalem, the capital city of PalestineNounproperfeminine singular
וְאֶת־wə·’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
אֲשֶׁר־’ă·šer-whichH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
בָּחַ֙רְתִּי֙bā·ḥar·tîI choseH977
√ bâchar — properly, to try, iVerbQalPerfectfirst person common singular
bâchar: properly, to try, to choose Strong's notes the root sense of testing before selecting. Election language, and the ground of every promise about Jerusalem in 1 Kings 8 and 11. Pulpit dates the choice concretely to David bringing up the ark (2 Samuel 6). The verse sets divine choosing and divine spurning in one breath without resolving them, and the resolution has to come from outside this book.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
הַבַּ֔יִתhab·ba·yiṯand the templeH1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcArticleNounmasculine singular
אֲשֶׁ֣ר’ă·šerof whichH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
אָמַ֔רְתִּי’ā·mar·tîI saidH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)VerbQalPerfectfirst person common singular
שְׁמִ֖יšə·mîMy NameH8034
√ shêm — an appellation, as amark or memorial of individualityNounmasculine singular constructfirst person common singular
shêm: an appellation, a mark or memorial of individuality "My Name shall be there" is the Deuteronomic formula for the single sanctuary (Deuteronomy 12:11; 1 Kings 8:29). The house is identified only by the Name lodged in it, so to reject the house is to withdraw the Name from a place. Benson reads the promise as conditional and its withdrawal as covenantal justice, not fickleness.
יִהְיֶ֥הyih·yehshall beH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iVerbQalImperfectthird person masculine singular
שָֽׁם׃šāmthereH8033
√ shâm — there (transferring to time) thenAdverb

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. The command and its echo: one verb, three verses — 23:21 to 23:23

⚙ The unit opens with a single root doing structural work. Josiah says עֲשׂוּ (‘ă·śū, H6213), "do ye a Passover," and the historian answers twice in the passive of the same verb: na·‘ă·śāh, it was done (v. 22), it was done (v. 23). Command, verdict, date. K&D notice the gap in the middle and name it exactly: "2 Kings 23:21 simply mentions the appointment of this festival on the part of the king, and the execution of the king's command has to be supplied." Kings does not narrate the feast at all; it grades it.

The grading hangs on one letter. In v. 22 the noun carries the comparative k-: כַּפֶּסַח הַזֶּה, "like this Passover." Ellicott records that the Septuagint drops that particle, and that Thenius built on the difference a theory that the text of Kings had been retouched, which Ellicott dismisses as "a weighty inference from such slight data." Cambridge is blunter, that the verse "cannot be tortured into the meaning" that no Passover had been kept since the judges, and Pulpit simply produces two that were (Joshua 5:10 to 11 and 2 Chronicles 30:13 to 26). Barnes states positively what the superiority consisted in: the multitudes, and "the completeness with which all the directions of the Law were observed."

What made completeness possible was a scroll. Ellicott, on v. 21, fixes the referent of the masculine demonstrative: not "the book of this covenant" but "this book of the covenant," the one "which Hilkiah had found in the Temple, and which gave the impulse to the whole reforming movement." Barnes draws the practical consequence for the feast, that reading the book "had shown him differences between the existing practice and the letter of the Law, differences consequent upon negligence, or upon the fact that tradition had been allowed in various points to override the Law." Poole and Benson agree on the order of operations, Benson in a sentence that could stand as the thesis of the chapter: "the way to keep out all abominable customs is to keep up all instituted ordinances."

ii. The purge that reaches the shelf, and the text stood upright — 23:24

⚙ Verse 24 moves from public altars to private property. The four objects are stacked in rising generality: ʼōbôt and yiddᵉʻōnîm, the mediums and the knowing-ones, both rare words (16 and 11 verses respectively) that almost always travel as a pair; then tᵉrāphîm, household gods, which K&D gloss as "penates, domestic gods, which were worshipped as the authors of earthly prosperity and as oracular deities"; then gillulîm, which Ellicott translates without euphemism as "The dunglings"; then kol hashiqqutsîm, all the detestable things, the catch-all under "all." Cambridge traces the teraphim from Rachel's saddlebag through Micah's shrine to Michal's bed. Pulpit adds that the gillulim here are likely private too, "figures used as amulets or talismans." This is a search of houses, not a demolition of temples.

Which is why the passive נִרְאוּ (nir·’ū, "were seen") is honest rather than triumphal. Ellicott calls it "a significant expression. Many idols were, doubtless, concealed by their worshippers." Poole says the same of those the priests "had removed, and endeavoured to hide and secure." Pulpit reads the phrase as covering "secret defilements and superstitious practices in households, which needed to be searched out." A reform that can only burn what surfaces is already a reform with a horizon.

The purpose clause is where the verse becomes theology. הָקִים (hā·qîm, Hiphil of qûwm) is "to cause to stand," and both Barnes and Cambridge press the R.V. "confirm" over the A.V. "perform." Cambridge: "What Josiah desired was not only to carry out on this occasion the prescription of the Law, but so to establish the observance that it should continue and not be lightly modified." K&D say it in their own idiom, "to set up the words of the law in the book of the law that had been found, i.e., to carry them out and bring them into force." ⚙ Note what the root then does: one verse later, qām, "arose." Josiah stood the words up; after him no king stood up like him.

iii. He turned, and the LORD did not turn — 23:25 to 23:26

⚙ The eulogy of v. 25 is not generic praise. It is Deuteronomy 6:5 pinned to a king: with all his lêbāb, all his nephesh, all his mᵉʼōd. Ellicott calls it "An echo of Deuteronomy 6:5"; K&D call it "an evident allusion." Pulpit reads the triad as exhaustive by design, "intended to include the whole moral and mental nature of man, all the energies of his understanding, his will, and his physical vitality." Both Ellicott and K&D then reach for Jeremiah 22:15 to 16 to show the praise was not merely ritual; Ellicott notes Josiah "is praised for his righteousness as a judge." Ellicott also declines to harmonise the superlative with the identical one given Hezekiah at 2 Kings 18:5, on the sensible ground that "a writer would not be careful to measure his words by the rule of strict proportion in such cases," and Barnes agrees: "We must not press the letter of either passage."

Then the hinge. The verb of v. 25 is שָׁב (šāḇ, H7725), "turned." The first two words of v. 26 after the restrictive ʼak are לֹא שָׁב, "turned not," of the LORD. K&D see the device and name it a word-play. ⚙ This is the most theologically dangerous sentence in the unit, and the commentators handle it in two distinguishable ways. Gill, JFB, Poole, Benson and Geneva relocate the cause from God's freedom to the people's insincerity: Geneva's marginal gloss is "Because of the wicked heart of the people, who would not turn to him by repentance"; JFB say the reform "was acquiesced in by the people from submission to the royal will"; Gill cites Jeremiah 3:10, that they turned "feignedly." Barnes goes a step further and calls genuine repentance no longer available: "the people had sunk into a condition in which a true repentance was no longer possible." K&D combine both, quoting Clericus that "although the king was most religious, and the people obeyed him through fear, yet for all that the mind of the people was not changed." Henry alone refuses to explain and simply confesses the darkness: "thy judgments are a great deep, unfathomable, and past finding out."

iv. The face, the choosing, and the Name withdrawn — 23:27

⚙ The final verse gathers the unit's vocabulary and turns it against Judah. Josiah burned away (bi·‘êr) the idols that were seen; now God will turn aside (ʼā·sîr, Hiphil of sûr) Judah from His face (pānay). Gill sets the necessary guardrail on the metaphor: "Not from his all seeing eye, but from being the object of his special care and protection." K&D read the removal in strict parallel with the north, citing 2 Kings 17:20 and 23.

Then two verbs collide in one clause: וּמָאַסְתִּי (mâʼaç, to spurn) against בָּחַרְתִּי (bâchar, I chose). Cambridge insists on the Hebrew order, "this city which I have chosen, even Jerusalem," and then, with unusual candour about its own preference, concedes "More than this cannot be said in its favour." Pulpit anchors the choosing historically in David's bringing up the ark, and the Name-formula in Deuteronomy 12:11 and 1 Kings 8:29. Benson takes the conditional route: "God promised upon conditions, in sundry places expressed, that his name should be there. These conditions they broke." Poole adds the striking phrase, that God "justly made them to know his breach of promise," glossing Numbers 14:34. ⚙ Whether one accepts the conditionality reading or not, the book of Kings ends its account of its best king with a house emptied of a Name, and hands the problem forward unresolved.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ Read only against itself, this unit is the book of Kings dismantling its own thesis. The Deuteronomistic argument has been that obedience brings life and disobedience brings ruin, and here the argument is given its perfect test case: a king who turns with all his heart, soul and muchness, a Passover kept more exactly than any since the judges, every medium and teraphim and dunghill-idol burned out of the land. The result is stated in the next breath: the LORD turned not. The commentators are not wrong to point at the people's insincere hearts, and Scripture itself supplies that reading in Jeremiah 3:10. But notice what the text places in the causal slot: not the people's insincerity, but Manasseh's provocations, a dead man's sins, and the Hebrew is emphatic that the wrath had already been kindled and had not cooled. Obedience here does not purchase; it delays. ⚙ I take the point of the unit to be that reformation and regeneration are different things, and that the first cannot manufacture the second. Josiah can stand the words of the Torah upright (hāqîm, v. 24); he cannot stand a nation's heart upright. He can burn what is seen (nirʼū, v. 24); he cannot reach what is only seen by the face he cannot see (pānay, v. 27). The very completeness of his obedience is what makes the verdict credible: if this was not enough, nothing done by a king from the outside ever will be. That is not a counsel of despair, and it is not an argument against obedience, since the text ranks Josiah at the top of every king in Judah and Jeremiah 22:15 to 16 records God's own approval of him. It is an argument that the covenant as given needed something it could not itself supply, a heart that turns and stays turned, which is exactly the lack Jeremiah names and exactly the thing he is promised will one day be written inside rather than found in a temple closet. ⚙ Offered as one reading, to be tested.

Josiah could stand the words of the Law upright; he could not stand a nation's heart upright. (This line is our own ⚙ synthesis, not Scripture.)

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The grandfather's mediums, burned by the grandson verbal / quotation: confirmed

2 Kings 21:6 reports that Manasseh "used divination and omens, and consulted mediums and spiritists," and the Chronicler repeats it at 2 Chronicles 33:6. Both verses share with 23:24 the same rare pair, אֹבוֹת (ʼôwb, H178) and יִדְּעֹנִים (yiddᵉʻônîy, H3049), and both share the provocation verb kaʻaç (H3707) that governs 23:26. ⚙ The link is not incidental: Kings is reporting the undoing of one named reign by another, item by item, in the same words, and then telling us in v. 26 that the undoing did not undo the wrath. Cambridge and Pulpit both send the reader back to 2 Kings 21:6 at exactly this point.

2 Kings 21:6 · 2 Chronicles 33:6

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H178 ʼôwb (rare, in 16 vv) and H3049 yiddᵉʻônîy (rare, in 11 vv), plus H3707 kaʻaç (in 52 vv). The rarity of the ʼôwb / yiddᵉʻônîy pair makes this a genuine verbal link within the book of Kings; it is repetition of vocabulary, not a citation formula.

The statute being enforced: Leviticus and Deuteronomy on the knowing-ones verbal / quotation: confirmed

Josiah's purge of mediums is not innovation; it is enforcement. Leviticus 19:31, Leviticus 20:6, Leviticus 20:27 and Deuteronomy 18:11 all carry the same rare word-pair the Verifier isolates here. Gill cites Deuteronomy 18:10 and Leviticus 20:27 on this verse; Ellicott sends the reader to "the law in Leviticus 20:27; Deuteronomy 18:9-10"; Cambridge lists Leviticus 19:31, 20:6 and 20:27 by name. ⚙ This is the strongest textual support in the unit for the historian's claim that the purge was done "to cause the words of the Torah to stand" (v. 24): the objects removed are named in the same vocabulary the Law uses to forbid them.

Leviticus 19:31 · Leviticus 20:27 · Deuteronomy 18:11

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H178 ʼôwb (in 16 vv) and H3049 yiddᵉʻônîy (in 11 vv) in each of the three refs. Both are rare and they occur together almost wherever they occur, which is what makes the link verbal rather than merely thematic. No quotation formula is present in the Hebrew.

Saul removed them too, and then went to find one verbal / quotation: confirmed

1 Samuel 28:3 says Saul "had removed the mediums and spiritists from the land" using the Hiphil of çûwr (H5493), the identical verb God uses in 2 Kings 23:27 of removing Judah from His face. The verse also shares both rare terms with 23:24. ⚙ The resonance is painful: 1 Samuel 28 records a king who purged the necromancers and then, when God would not answer him, went by night to consult one. Kings does not cite that story, but it reaches for the same three words, and the unit it stands in is about a purge that could not change the outcome. Offered as a verbal link with a thematic sting, not as an argument that the author intended the allusion.

1 Samuel 28:3

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H178 ʼôwb (in 16 vv), H3049 yiddᵉʻônîy (in 11 vv), H5493 çûwr (in 281 vv). The first two are rare and establish the verbal link; çûwr is common and carries no weight on its own. The narrative irony we draw from it is ⚙ synthesis, not a sourced claim.

The Chronicler's fuller account of the same Passover structural / thematic: confirmed

2 Chronicles 35:1 to 19 gives nineteen verses to what Kings gives three, and 2 Chronicles 35:18 repeats this unit's verdict almost word for word, substituting "since the days of Samuel the prophet" for "from the days of the judges." Ellicott: "The chronicler repeats this very verse at the close of his narrative of Josiah's passover." K&D list what the Chronicler adds: that "all the nation," including the remnant of the ten tribes, took part, and that it was kept in strict accordance with the Mosaic precepts, unlike Hezekiah's feast, which had to be moved to the second month. Cambridge notes the Chronicler makes the same superlative claim even though he alone records Hezekiah's Passover, which "shews clearly that his meaning was that no passover-feast had gone so strictly according to the book of the covenant."

2 Chronicles 35:18 · 2 Chronicles 35:19 · 2 Chronicles 35:1

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H6453 peçach (in 46 vv, repeatedly) plus H6240 ʻâsâr (in 291 vv). Deliberately not tiered verbal: peçach is the ordinary name of the feast and its recurrence proves shared subject matter, not quotation. The near-verbatim overlap of 2 Chronicles 35:18 with 2 Kings 23:22 is a parallel-account relationship, and its direction of dependence is disputed.

Deuteronomy 6:5 pinned to a king structural / thematic: confirmed

"With all his heart and with all his soul and with all his strength" is the Shema's command turned into a historian's verdict. Ellicott calls it "An echo of Deuteronomy 6:5"; K&D call it "an evident allusion"; Pulpit says the passage "is in the writer's mind." The Verifier confirms all three nouns are shared. ⚙ We tier this structural rather than verbal because each of the three lexemes is common; what is rare is the combination, and that combination is an allusion rather than a quotation, since no citation formula appears and the grammar is third-person narrative, not imperative.

Deuteronomy 6:5

basis: Verifier pair check: shared Hebrew lexemes H3824 lêbâb (in 230 vv), H5315 nephesh (in 683 vv), H3966 mᵉʼôd (in 279 vv). All three are common individually, so the link rests on the shared triadic formula, not on lexeme rarity. Ellicott and K&D both name it as an echo of Deuteronomy 6:5.

Removed from before My face, as Israel was structural / thematic: confirmed

2 Kings 17:20 records that the LORD "rejected all the descendants of Israel" and afflicted them, and v. 23 that He "removed Israel out of His sight." 2 Kings 23:27 says Judah's sentence will be the same one, in the same two words. K&D cross-reference 17:20 and 17:23 here directly; Pulpit quotes 17:18. ⚙ Within the architecture of Kings this is the closing of a bracket: the northern verdict has become the southern verdict, and the only remaining question in the book is the timing.

2 Kings 17:20

basis: Verifier pair check: shared Hebrew lexemes H3988 mâʼaç (in 69 vv) and H6440 pânîym (in 1892 vv). mâʼaç is moderately uncommon and pânîym is extremely common, so the pairing establishes a real shared formula without justifying a verbal / quotation tier. K&D name 2 Kings 17:20 and 17:23 as the parallel.

K&D's appeal to Deuteronomy 29:16, which we could not verify flagged: verify source

K&D state that gillulîm and shiqqutsîm are "connected together, as in Deuteronomy 29:16, as a contemptuous description of idols in general." ⚙ We ran the pair through the Verifier and it returned no shared original-language lexeme in our index for 2 Kings 23:24 and Deuteronomy 29:16. That may be a versification difference (Hebrew and English numbering of Deuteronomy 29 differ by one verse) rather than an error by K&D, whose observation about the word-pair is independently well attested elsewhere. We record the claim, we record our failure to confirm it, and we do not build on it.

Deuteronomy 29:16

basis: Verifier pair check returned: no shared original-language lexeme found in the index for 2 Kings 23:24 and Deuteronomy 29:16. The link is asserted by Keil & Delitzsch and is plausible, but is unconfirmed here; the Hebrew and English verse numbering of Deuteronomy 29 differ, which may account for the miss.

Cross-Testament: the reform that could not write on the heart structural / thematic: confirmed

⚙ The unit's problem, a total external obedience that does not change a nation's interior, is the problem Jeremiah names in the same generation and the same city: "I will put My law in their minds and write it on their hearts" (Jeremiah 31:33), quoted at length in Hebrews 8:8 to 12. Josiah's verb was hāqîm, to stand the written words up on a scroll; Jeremiah's promise moves the writing surface. The commentators in this brief repeatedly reach for Jeremiah to explain v. 26: Barnes says "the earlier chapters of Jeremiah are full" of reproaches for insincerity, K&D point to "the first ten chapters of Jeremiah," and Poole and Benson both name Jeremiah and Zephaniah. ⚙ We assert only that the two texts address the same defect, not that either quotes the other.

Jeremiah 31:33 · Hebrews 8:10

basis: Cross-Testament, so no shared Strong's number is possible between the Hebrew of 2 Kings and the Greek of Hebrews; this cannot be tiered verbal on any lexical ground. The basis is the shared diagnosis (written law external to an unchanged heart) plus the fact that five of this unit's commentators independently invoke Jeremiah to explain v. 26. Hebrews 8:8-12 does quote Jeremiah 31:31-34 explicitly, but that quotation is between those two texts, not with 2 Kings 23.

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

The antitype of the Passover ancient/widely-held

Gill says it in his note on v. 21: the feast was "a commemoration of their deliverance out of Egypt, and a direction of their faith to the Messiah, the antitype of the passover." ⚙ This is not Gill's private conceit. Paul makes the identification flatly at 1 Corinthians 5:7, "Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed," and John hangs the crucifixion account on the paschal regulation that no bone of it be broken (John 19:36, citing Exodus 12:46). ⚙ What this unit adds is the shape of the fulfilment rather than the fact of it. Josiah's Passover is celebrated as the most exact in the history of Israel, kept in the one chosen place, and five verses later that place is under sentence. The feast that measured all others could not keep the city from being spurned. The New Testament's claim is that the same rite finds a keeping that does hold, in a death outside that same city.

1 Corinthians 5:7 · John 19:36 · Exodus 12:46

The house emptied of the Name, and the Name that pitched its tent ancient/widely-held

The unit ends with God withdrawing from a building: "the house of which I said, My Name shall be there" (v. 27), the Deuteronomic Name-formula of Deuteronomy 12:11 and 1 Kings 8:29. Pulpit recalls how visibly that Name had once taken possession, fire from heaven and the glory filling the house (2 Chronicles 7:1). ⚙ The Gospel of John takes up exactly this vocabulary in reverse. The Word "tabernacled among us, and we beheld His glory" (John 1:14), and when asked for a sign concerning the temple Jesus answers with a demolition and a raising, "but He was speaking about the temple of His body" (John 2:19 to 21). Where 2 Kings records a Name leaving a house, the apostolic reading is of the Name taking a body that cannot be rejected out of existence. The identification of Christ with the true temple is the evangelist's own, not ours.

John 1:14 · John 2:19-21 · 1 Kings 8:29

The best king turns, and it is not enough novel

⚙ Verse 25 is the highest verdict Kings ever passes on a man, and verse 26 immediately declines to let it save anyone. The best obedience recorded in the book postpones judgment for one lifetime and then the judgment falls. Read redemptive-historically, this is the Old Testament closing off one road: no king out of David's line, however wholehearted, can stand as substitute for the people he rules. Henry feels the weight and will not explain it away, only confessing that God's "judgments are a great deep." ⚙ The New Testament answer is not a better Josiah but a different kind of representative: one whose obedience is reckoned to others rather than merely modelled before them (Romans 5:19), and who, like Josiah, is cut off in the midst of his usefulness, but unlike Josiah is cut off for the people (Isaiah 53:8). ⚙ We mark this reading as our own construction: the specific contrast between Josiah's non-transferable obedience and Christ's is not drawn by any commentator quoted in this brief, though the underlying doctrine of representative obedience is ancient.

Romans 5:19 · Isaiah 53:8 · Hebrews 7:25

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

Text. Scripture is the Berean Standard Bible (CC0); the interlinear, parsings and Strong's numbers are from the Berean apparatus supplied in this unit's brief. All Hebrew forms cited above are copied from that interlinear, including its word ordering, which follows the English gloss sequence rather than strict Masoretic order in vv. 21, 24, 25 and 27. Readers checking against a Hebrew Bible should expect the surface forms to match but the index order not always to.

What is disputed in the sources. The meaning of v. 22 is the live question. Ellicott records that the Septuagint omits the particle of comparison (ὅτι οὐκ ἐγενήθη τὸ πασχα τοῦτο), and that De Wette and Thenius built on that and on the Chronicles parallel a claim that no Passover had been held before, or that the text of Kings was retouched. Ellicott, Cambridge, Pulpit, Gill and K&D all reject the conclusion, and Ellicott calls the position "obsolete, even among 'advanced critics.'" ⚙ We follow the Hebrew as it stands, where the comparative k- is present.

What is uncertain. (1) The date of Josiah's eighteenth year: Pulpit gives circa B.C. 622 to 621, a nineteenth-century reckoning we have not independently verified. (2) The contents and extent of the scroll Hilkiah found: Pulpit argues it "must, therefore, certainly have contained Exodus," Cambridge argues it contained material now found in Deuteronomy, Leviticus, Exodus and Numbers while allowing that it was probably not in our present form. Both are inferences from the uses Josiah makes of it, since Kings never quotes it. (3) K&D's cross-reference to Deuteronomy 29:16 for the gillulîm and shiqqutsîm pairing returned no shared lexeme in our index; it is flagged in the threads and not relied upon. (4) Gill cites "Clemens of Alexandria, Stromat. l. 1. p. 328" as holding that no Passover was kept between Samuel and Josiah, and calls it a mistake; we have not checked the Clement reference and pass on Gill's report as Gill's.

What we have added. Everything marked ⚙ is machine synthesis and fallible: the literal renderings, the divergence notes, the observation that ʻâsâh binds vv. 21 to 23, that hāqîm (v. 24) and qām (v. 25) are the same root, and that nirʼū (v. 24) stands in tension with pānay (v. 27). Those last three are our readings of the sourced parse data, not claims found in any commentator quoted here. The word-play between šāb in v. 25 and lōʼ šāb in v. 26 is not ours; K&D state it. The third Christ entry is explicitly marked novel.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)