And Jehoiakim rested with his fathers, and his son Jehoiachin reigned in his place.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
yə·hō·w·yā·qîm way·yiš·kaḇ ‘im- ’ă·ḇō·ṯāw bə·nōw yə·hō·w·yā·ḵîn way·yim·lōḵ taḥ·tāw
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
Jehoiachin Reigns in Judah
2 Kings 24:6–9 — Jehoiachin Reigns in Judah. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
And Jehoiakim rested with his fathers, and his son Jehoiachin reigned in his place.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
yə·hō·w·yā·qîm way·yiš·kaḇ ‘im- ’ă·ḇō·ṯāw bə·nōw yə·hō·w·yā·ḵîn way·yim·lōḵ taḥ·tāw
Now the king of Egypt did not march out of his land again, because the king of Babylon had taken all his territory, from the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates River.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
me·leḵ miṣ·ra·yim wə·lō- lā·ṣêṯ mê·’ar·ṣōw hō·sîp̄ ‘ō·wḏ kî- me·leḵ bā·ḇel lā·qaḥ kōl ’ă·šer hā·yə·ṯāh lə·me·leḵ miṣ·rā·yim min·na·ḥal miṣ·ra·yim ‘aḏ- pə·rāṯ nə·har-
Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months. His mother’s name was Nehushta daughter of Elnathan; she was from Jerusalem.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
yə·hō·w·yā·ḵîn šə·mō·neh ‘eś·rêh ben- šā·nāh bə·mā·lə·ḵōw mā·laḵ bî·rū·šā·lim ū·šə·lō·šāh ḥo·ḏā·šîm ’im·mōw wə·šêm nə·ḥuš·tā ḇaṯ- ’el·nā·ṯān mî·rū·šā·lim
And he did evil in the sight of the LORD, just as his father had done.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
way·ya·‘aś hā·ra‘ bə·‘ê·nê Yah·weh kə·ḵōl ’ă·šer- ’ā·ḇîw ‘ā·śāh
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
⚙ The verse is built out of two stock clauses of Kings, and the interpretive event is a third clause that never arrives. וַיִּשְׁכַּב (shâkab, H7901) puts Jehoiakim down “with his fathers,” and then the narrator stops. Ellicott states the case: the usual notice of the king's burial is omitted, and the omission is significant read against Jeremiah 22:18-19. Geneva's marginal (c) denies the burial outright; Gill says he “had no burial at all”; Cambridge, more carefully, refuses to decide how the violent death came about and records only that no mention is made of any burial. K&D adds the grammatical control that keeps this from being special pleading: the same idiom covers Ahab, who was slain in battle (1 Kings 22:40), so the formula cannot be pressed to mean a peaceful end. JFB agrees that the phraseology “can mean nothing more than that he died.” Pulpit alone leaves open that the body was later entombed with Manasseh, Amon and Josiah. Five witnesses, one silence, and no one in the brief claims to know how Jehoiakim died.
⚙ The narrator interrupts a royal succession to file a note on Egyptian foreign policy, and the note is a death sentence. Ellicott reads it as the posture of affairs at Jehoiachin's accession: Necho stripped of his conquests and crippled, Judah left “denuded of all external help.” Benson and Poole say the same in pastoral terms, that Egypt could not protect Judah, being scarce able to defend itself. K&D draws the conclusion the verse exists to force: under these circumstances a successful resistance to the Chaldaeans was not for a moment to be thought of. But the geography is doing more than politics. Pulpit and Cambridge both insist that נַחַל מִצְרַיִם is the Wady el Arish and not the Nile, the accepted frontier between Egypt and Syria, and the far marker is פְּרָת (Pᵉrâth, H6578), the Euphrates. Those two points are the outer limits of the land promised at Genesis 15:18 and repeated at Deuteronomy 11:24. The Verifier confirms the shared lexemes. What Nebuchadnezzar has “taken” is described, in the deuteronomistic historian's own boundary vocabulary, as the shape of the promise.
⚙ Three of the four data in this regnal notice are contested or loaded. On the age, Cambridge, Gill, K&D and Pulpit take 2 Chronicles 36:9's “eight” as a copyist's slip of the small yod, and Cambridge supplies the decisive argument from the text itself: at v. 15 Jehoiachin has wives. Poole and Benson defend both numbers by a coregency from the eighth year, and Poole generalises the principle that regnal years in Scripture are “not always accounted from the beginning of their age.” JFB simply asserts the coregency. On the length, Gill and Cambridge note that Chronicles adds ten days to the three months. On the mother, Barnes marks how insistently Nehushta is named wherever her son appears, Pulpit, following Ewald, calls her probably the ruling spirit of the reign, and Cambridge and K&D identify her father Elnathan with the prince of Jeremiah 26:22 and 36:12, 25. The Verifier finds H494 in five verses only, which makes that identification a genuinely narrow link rather than a guess at a common name.
⚙ The formula is fixed: הָרַע with the article, “the evil,” in the eyes of YHWH, כְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר “according to all that” his father did. The commentators divide honestly over how much personal content to read into it. JFB paints it darkly, untaught by experience and deaf to the prophetic warnings. K&D imports Ezekiel 19:5-7 wholesale, a young lion who devoured men. Ellicott flags the problem: Thenius asks how a boy king could do any such thing in ninety days, much of it under siege, and Hitzig and Thenius refer Ezekiel 19 to Zedekiah instead. Pulpit reads the clause at its minimum, that he made no attempt at a religious reformation, and adds the one thing that counts in his favour, that he did not persecute Jeremiah. Henry, characteristically, moves from the man to the house: three months was long enough to show he trod in his fathers' steps. The text itself claims only the repetition, one verb (ʻâsâh, H6213) used twice, father and son.
⚙ Read only against itself, this unit is four verses about what does not pass down. A burial place does not pass down: the formula reaches for “with his fathers” and the clause that would put him in the tomb is missing. A kingdom does not pass down: תַּחְתָּיו puts Jehoiachin in his father's place for three new moons. A protector does not pass down: Egypt, having failed Josiah at Megiddo, will not come out of its land again. Territory does not pass down: everything from the torrent of Egypt to the Euphrates now belongs to Babylon, and those happen to be the two boundary stones of the promise to Abraham. Exactly one thing passes down intact, and the narrator spells it with the same verb twice: he did, according to all that his father had done. That is the unit's whole argument. Sin is the only durable inheritance in Judah's royal house, and it is durable enough to survive the collapse of everything else the house owns. But the writer has planted something under the wreckage that he does not explain. He gives the boy a name that means Yahweh will establish, and he gives that name to a king who is established for ninety days. He names a rare grandfather, Elnathan, whom Cambridge and K&D identify as one of the princes who begged that the scroll not be burned. Jeremiah, we are told by Barnes and Pulpit, cut the future tense out of the name to say that this one God would not establish. Kings does not cut it. Kings keeps the full form, Jehoiachin, through this verse and through the deportation, and holds it to the last four verses of the book, where the man with the promise in his name is lifted out of prison and eats at a table for the rest of his life. ⚙ This is our fallible reading, offered to be tested: the unit is not describing the end of the Davidic line but demonstrating that nothing in the line's own possession, not tomb, throne, land or merit, is what keeps it. The only thing left at the end of 2 Kings is a name that says God will establish, attached to a man who has proved he cannot establish himself.
The line kept nothing it owned, and was kept by a name it could not live up to. (⚙ synthesis, not Scripture.)
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The rare name יְהוֹיָכִין (Yᵉhôwyâkîyn, H3078) occurs in only eight verses of the Hebrew Bible, and this unit holds two of them. The Verifier links this verse to 2 Kings 25:27 and Jeremiah 52:31, where the same man, thirty seven years into captivity, has his head lifted up out of prison by Evil-Merodach. Barnes and Pulpit both read the name as “Yahweh will establish,” and both note that Jeremiah's Coniah cuts the future out of it deliberately. Kings does not cut it. The narrator keeps the full form from accession to release, so that the last named descendant of David in the book is a man whose name is a promise and whose record is three months and a prison ration.
2 Kings 25:27 · Jeremiah 52:31 · 2 Kings 24:12
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H3078 Yᵉhôwyâkîyn (rare, in 8 vv) with H894 Bâbel (in 233 vv) at 2 Kings 25:27 and Jeremiah 52:31. The link is onomastic, a chain of occurrences of one rare royal name, not a quotation of one text by another.
Nehushta's father is named אֶלְנָתָן (ʼElnâthân, H494), a name the Verifier finds in five verses only. Three of them are the Jeremiah passages: Elnathan son of Achbor, sent by Jehoiakim into Egypt to fetch back the prophet Urijah for execution (Jeremiah 26:22), and Elnathan among the princes who heard Jeremiah's scroll read and who made intercession with the king not to burn it (Jeremiah 36:12, 25). Cambridge calls the identification almost certain; K&D names him a ruler of the people, a prince from Jerusalem. If they are right, the same man served the machinery that killed one prophet and pleaded for the words of another, and his grandson inherited the throne.
Jeremiah 26:22 · Jeremiah 36:12 · Jeremiah 36:25 · Ezra 8:16
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H494 ʼElnâthân (rare, in 5 vv), with H3079 Yᵉhôwyâqîym (in 37 vv) also shared at Jeremiah 26:22. A rare proper name, not a quotation; the Ezra 8:16 occurrence is a different, post-exilic Elnathan and is listed only to show how few occurrences exist.
Verse 7 marks Nebuchadnezzar's holdings with the same two landmarks that mark the grant to Abraham. פְּרָת (Pᵉrâth, H6578, in eighteen verses) with נָהָר (nâhâr, H5104) is the Verifier's confirmed shared basis with Genesis 15:18, where the seed is promised the land from the river of Egypt to the great river Euphrates, and with Deuteronomy 11:24, where the same limit is set before the generation entering the land. The same pair stands at Genesis 2:14, in Eden. Cambridge and Pulpit both establish that the southern marker here is the Wady el Arish, the accepted frontier, which is exactly the boundary language of 1 Kings 8:65. ⚙ The historian is reporting a conquest in the vocabulary of an inheritance. The claim is shared boundary language, not a quotation of Genesis.
Genesis 15:18 · Deuteronomy 11:24 · Genesis 2:14 · 1 Chronicles 18:3
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H6578 Pᵉrâth (in 18 vv) and H5104 nâhâr (in 108 vv) at Genesis 15:18, Deuteronomy 11:24, Genesis 2:14 and 1 Chronicles 18:3. Real verbal overlap inside a shared boundary motif; the deliberateness of the echo is our inference, so the tier stays structural.
The Verifier links this unit to 2 Chronicles 36:8-9, which share H3078 and H4427 (mâlak) and which give the age as eight and the reign as three months and ten days. Cambridge, Gill, K&D and Pulpit treat the shorter number as a copyist's slip of the yod, and Cambridge supplies the internal evidence: at v. 15 Jehoiachin has wives. Poole, Benson and JFB defend both numbers by a coregency begun in the eighth year, Poole adding the wider principle that regnal years in Scripture are sometimes counted from an era rather than from birth, as Ezekiel dates by the years of this very captivity (Ezekiel 1:2; 33:21; 40:1). ⚙ This is a live textual disagreement among the sources, and we do not resolve it.
2 Chronicles 36:8 · 2 Chronicles 36:9
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H3078 Yᵉhôwyâkîyn (in 8 vv), H3079 Yᵉhôwyâqîym (in 37 vv) and H4427 mâlak (in 284 vv). Parallel regnal accounts of the same events, which is why no quotation is claimed; the numerical divergence between them is unresolved in the sources.
K&D reads Ezekiel 19:5-7 as a description of Jehoiachin, the young lion who learned to prey and devoured men, and takes it as the substance behind the verdict of v. 9; JFB says the bad character is figuratively but strongly depicted there. Ellicott records the objection: Thenius asks how, in his position and during a reign of some ninety days, much of it under siege, he could do what Ezekiel describes, and Hitzig and Thenius refer the passage to Zedekiah. Ellicott further notes that Josephus called Jehoiachin naturally good and just, which Ellicott thinks a misreading of Jeremiah 22:24, 28. ⚙ Since the identification of Ezekiel's second lion is genuinely disputed in our own sources, this link is flagged rather than asserted.
Ezekiel 19:5-9 · Jeremiah 22:24 · Jeremiah 22:28
basis: No shared-lexeme basis computed by the Verifier. The referent of Ezekiel 19:5-9 is contested within the brief itself: Keil and Ewald read Jehoiachin, Hitzig and Thenius read Zedekiah, and Josephus's estimate of the king runs the other way. Provenance disputed; verify before use.
Poole notes in passing that Jehoiakim too is called Jeconiah “by comparing this with Matthew 1:11,” and Benson, Barnes, Gill, Cambridge and Pulpit all record that Jehoiachin is the Jeconiah of 1 Chronicles 3:16 and the Coniah of Jeremiah 22:24. Matthew 1:11-12 carries that name across the deportation to Babylon and on toward Christ. ⚙ The link is real and the commentators state it, but it cannot be tiered verbal: Matthew is Greek and this unit is Hebrew, so no shared Strong's lexeme exists to compute, and the transliterated name is not a shared lexeme in the Verifier's sense. It is a structural link between two royal registers.
Matthew 1:11-12 · 1 Chronicles 3:16
basis: Cross-Testament Greek to Hebrew, so shared Strong's numbers are unavailable by definition and no verbal tier is possible. Basis is the named identification of Jehoiachin with Jeconiah and Coniah, recorded by Poole, Benson, Barnes, Gill, Cambridge and Pulpit, plus the shared structural form of a royal succession list.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
Barnes and Pulpit agree on what the names mean: Jehoiachin and Jeconiah both say “Yahweh will establish,” Coniah says “Yahweh establishes,” and Jeremiah, in Barnes's words, shortened the name “thus cutting off from it the notion of futurity, to imply that that would not be which the name declared would be.” K&D quotes the sentence of Jeremiah 36:30, that no son of Jehoiakim shall sit upon the throne of David, and with Benson and JFB weighs the three month vassal reign as no reign at all. The line, judged by what it can do, is finished here. Matthew 1:11-12 nevertheless carries Jeconiah across the deportation, and the throne that v. 6 hands over for ninety days is the throne Gabriel names at Luke 1:32-33 as given without end. ⚙ That a cursed and deposed Jeconiah stands in the genealogy of Christ is the reading the church has held since Matthew wrote the list; it is apostolic, not novel. What this unit adds is the grammar of it: the name means what it says, and it did not come true in the man who wore it.
Matthew 1:11-12 · Jeremiah 22:30 · Luke 1:32-33
The Verifier ties this unit by the rare name H3078 to 2 Kings 25:27 and Jeremiah 52:31, the closing scene of the history: Jehoiachin brought out of prison in the thirty seventh year of his captivity, his seat set above the other kings, eating bread continually before the king of Babylon. ⚙ Our reading is that the compiler of Kings ends on that man deliberately. Everything the dynasty held has been stripped in 24:6-9, tomb, throne, protector and land, and the last picture the book offers is a condemned Davidic king who is given a place at a table he did not earn, by a word from a foreign sovereign. Read forward, that is the shape of what Christ does for the condemned. ⚙ This figural reading is ours and we mark it novel: none of the commentators in this brief draws it, and the honest thing to say is that Kings supplies the picture and we supply the application.
2 Kings 25:27-30 · Jeremiah 52:31-34
Ellicott, Cambridge, Geneva, Gill and JFB all converge on the missing clause in v. 6: no burial is recorded, and JFB states that Jehoiakim “was not honored with the rites of sepulture.” Jeremiah 22:19, as K&D quotes it, sentences him to be “buried like an ass, carried away and cast out far away from the gates of Jerusalem.” ⚙ The contrast we draw is with the one who was led outside the gate bearing a sentence that was not his own (Hebrews 13:12) and was laid in a tomb that belonged to another (Isaiah 53:9). Jehoiakim was cast out of the city for his own evil and left unburied; Christ went out of the city under the evil of others and was buried with the rich. The pattern is a real one in the text, but the pairing is our own construction and the commentators here do not make it.
Jeremiah 22:19 · Hebrews 13:12 · Isaiah 53:9
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
⚙ Honesty notes for 2 Kings 24:6-9. (1) The central fact of v. 6 is an absence, the missing burial clause, and an argument from silence is only as strong as the pattern it breaks; the pattern in Kings is strong, but it is still silence. (2) How Jehoiakim died is unknown. Ellicott reports Ewald's reconstruction (lured out, seized, killed) and K&D rejects it on the ground that v. 10 puts the siege after his death; K&D's own reconstruction, death in battle, is also a reconstruction. Cambridge is the most honest of the group: “we cannot decide.” Pulpit's suggestion of a later entombment with Manasseh, Amon and Josiah cuts against the others. We report the disagreement and take no side. (3) Gill's details about the temple vessels and the citation of Eupolemus by way of Eusebius come from sources outside Kings and are not verified here. (4) The age at accession is a real textual problem: this verse reads eighteen, 2 Chronicles 36:9 reads eight, and the brief's commentators split between a scribal slip (Cambridge, Gill, K&D, Pulpit) and a coregency (Poole, Benson, JFB). Poole and Cambridge both appeal to the Syriac and Arabic versions reading eighteen in Chronicles; we have not collated those versions ourselves. (5) The character verdict of v. 9 is formulaic, and the attempt to fill it with Ezekiel 19:5-9 is disputed inside the brief, so that thread is flagged. (6) All Strong's numbers, parses and thread bases are the Verifier's and the Berean interlinear's; the thread tiers, the divergence notes and everything marked ⚙ are machine synthesis and fallible. (7) The two figural readings offered under Christ are marked novel because no commentator in this brief draws them; they are submitted to be tested, not taught.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)