The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

2 Kings4:1–7

The Widow’s Oil

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

2 Kings 4:1–7 — The Widow’s Oil. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

1

Now the wife of one of the sons of the prophets cried out to Elisha, “Your servant, my husband, is dead, and you know that your servant feared the LORD. And now his creditor is coming to take my two children as his slaves!”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

min·nə·šê wə·’iš·šāh ’a·ḥaṯ ḇə·nê- han·nə·ḇî·’îm ṣā·‘ă·qāh ’el- ’ĕ·lî·šā‘ lê·mōr ‘aḇ·də·ḵā ’î·šî mêṯ wə·’at·tāh yā·ḏa‘·tā kî ‘aḇ·də·ḵā hā·yāh yā·rê ’eṯ- Yah·weh wə·han·nō·šeh bā lā·qa·ḥaṯ ’eṯ- šə·nê yə·lā·ḏay lōw la·‘ă·ḇā·ḏîm

Word by word28 · parsed
מִנְּשֵׁ֣יmin·nə·šêNow the wifeH802
√ ʼishshâh — a womanPreposition-mNounfeminine plural construct
וְאִשָּׁ֣הwə·’iš·šāh. . .H802
√ ʼishshâh — a womanConjunctive wawNounfeminine singular
אַחַ֣ת’a·ḥaṯof oneH259
√ ʼechâd — properly, united, iNumberfeminine singular
בְנֵֽי־ḇə·nê-of the sonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural construct
הַ֠נְּבִיאִיםhan·nə·ḇî·’îmof the prophetsH5030
√ nâbîyʼ — a prophet or (generally) inspired manArticleNounmasculine plural
nâbîyʼ: prophet, inspired man The plural (sons of the prophets) is a guild term, not a monastery: Ellicott and Pulpit both press that these men had wives, houses and debts.
צָעֲקָ֨הṣā·‘ă·qāhcried outH6817
√ tsâʻaq — to shriekVerbQalPerfectthird person feminine singular
tsâ‘aq: to shriek The lexicon gloss is deliberately harsh. This is the covenant scream that Exodus attaches to the widow and the orphan and to the poor man whose cloak is held in pledge, the cry God promises to hear because he is compassionate. That the narrative opens with a woman shrieking at a prophet, rather than with a king or an army, sets the register for the whole of 2 Kings 4.
אֶל־’el-toH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPreposition
אֱלִישָׁ֜ע’ĕ·lî·šā‘ElishaH477
√ ʼĔlîyshâʻ — Elisha, the famous prophetNounpropermasculine singular
לֵאמֹ֗רlê·mōr. . .H559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Preposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
עַבְדְּךָ֤‘aḇ·də·ḵāYour servantH5650
√ ʻebed — a servantNounmasculine singular constructsecond person masculine singular
‘ebed: a servant Used three times in one verse (9, 15, 27). The dead man is twice called ‘aḇdəḵā, thy servant, which is both deference to Elisha and a claim: he belonged to the prophetic household. The creditor's demand would convert that voluntary service into ‘ăḇāḏîm, chattel service, and so undo in one seizure what the man's whole life confessed.
אִישִׁי֙’î·šîmy husbandH376
√ ʼîysh — a man as an individual or a male personNounmasculine singular constructfirst person common singular
מֵ֔תmêṯis deadH4191
√ mûwth — to die (literally or figuratively)VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
וְאַתָּ֣הwə·’at·tāhand youH859
√ ʼattâh — thou and thee, or (plural) ye and youConjunctive wawPronounsecond person masculine singular
יָדַ֔עְתָּyā·ḏa‘·tāknowH3045
√ yâdaʻ — to know (properly, to ascertain by seeing)VerbQalPerfectsecond person masculine singular
כִּ֣יthatH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
עַבְדְּךָ֔‘aḇ·də·ḵāyour servantH5650
√ ʻebed — a servantNounmasculine singular constructsecond person masculine singular
הָיָ֥הhā·yāhH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iVerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
יָרֵ֖אyā·rêfearedH3373
√ yârêʼ — fearingAdjectivemasculine singular
yârêʼ: fearing An adjective, not a finite verb: he was one fearing YHWH. Geneva draws the covenantal inference plainly, that such a man did not fall into debt by carelessness or excess. Benson and Poole go further and read his poverty as the cost of refusing the king's worship. That is inference, not text: the narrative gives the fear of YHWH and the debt side by side and declines to explain the connection.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
יְהוָ֑הYah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉhôvâh: the divine name Marked by the object particle אֶת, the only naming of God in the woman's speech, and it comes not as an appeal but as the object of her husband's settled fear. She asks nothing of YHWH directly. Her whole petition is addressed to a man, on the ground of what her husband was toward God, and the narrator lets that stand as a sufficient prayer. In v. 7 he answers her one divine name with his own title for Elisha, (the man of the God).
וְהַ֨נֹּשֶׁ֔הwə·han·nō·šehAnd now his creditorH5383
√ nâshâh — to lend or (by reciprocity) borrow on security or interestConjunctive waw, ArticleVerbQalParticiplemasculine singular
nâshâh: to lend on security A rare root, standing in only eleven verses in the Hebrew Bible, and the Verifier finds almost all of them clustered in the debt legislation (Exodus 22:25; Deuteronomy 15:2; 24:10, 11) and its prophetic aftermath (Isaiah 24:2; 50:1; Jeremiah 15:10; Nehemiah 5; Psalm 109:11). The word itself drags the whole law of the pledge into the room.
בָּ֗אis comingH935
√ bôwʼ — to go or come (in a wide variety of applications)VerbQalParticiplemasculine singular
לָקַ֜חַתlā·qa·ḥaṯto takeH3947
√ lâqach — to take (in the widest variety of applications)Preposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
lâqach: to take Neutral in itself, brutal here: the infinitive of simple taking is what the law permitted the creditor to do to children.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
שְׁנֵ֧יšə·nêmy twoH8147
√ shᵉnayim — twoNumbermasculine dual construct
יְלָדַ֛יyə·lā·ḏaychildrenH3206
√ yeled — something born, iNounmasculine plural constructfirst person common singular
yeled: something born, a child Cambridge notes that the Revised Version reads (children) here because the Hebrew word in v. 1 is not the word used in v. 4 (bēn). The narrative first names them as things born of her, then, once the prophet speaks, as sons who work.
ל֖וֹlōwas his
Prepositionthird person masculine singular
לַעֲבָדִֽים׃la·‘ă·ḇā·ḏîmslavesH5650
√ ʻebed — a servantPreposition-lNounmasculine plural
‘ăḇāḏîm: slaves The same root as note 9, now plural and governed by : taken (for slaves). Barnes, Cambridge, JFB and K&D all record that Leviticus 25:39-41 permitted this and capped it at the jubilee.
2

“How can I help you?” asked Elisha. “Tell me, what do you have in the house?” She answered, “Your servant has nothing in the house but a jar of oil.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

māh ’e·‘ĕ·śeh- lāḵ way·yō·mer ’ĕ·lî·šā‘ ’ê·le·hā hag·gî·ḏî lî mah- yeš- lə·ḵī bab·bā·yiṯ wat·tō·mer lə·šip̄·ḥā·ṯə·ḵā ’ên ḵōl bab·ba·yiṯ kî ’im- ’ā·sūḵ šā·men

Word by word21 · parsed
מָ֣הmāhHowH4100
√ mâh — properly, interrogative what? (including how? why? when?)Interrogative
אֶֽעֱשֶׂה־’e·‘ĕ·śeh-can IH6213
√ ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest applicationVerbQalImperfectfirst person common singular
‘âsâh: to do, to make The prophet's opening move is a question, not a word of power. Elisha does not import a remedy; he asks what is already in the house.
לָּ֔ךְlāḵhelp you
Prepositionsecond person feminine singular
וַיֹּ֨אמֶרway·yō·meraskedH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
אֱלִישָׁע֙’ĕ·lî·šā‘ElishaH477
√ ʼĔlîyshâʻ — Elisha, the famous prophetNounpropermasculine singular
אֵלֶ֤יהָ’ê·le·hā. . .H413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPrepositionthird person feminine singular
הַגִּ֣ידִיhag·gî·ḏîTellH5046
√ nâgad — properly, to front, iVerbHifilImperativefeminine singular
לִ֔יme
Prepositionfirst person common singular
מַה־mah-whatH4100
√ mâh — properly, interrogative what? (including how? why? when?)Interrogative
יֶּשׁ־yeš-do you haveH3426
√ yêsh — there is or are (or any other form of the verb to be, as may suit the connection)Adverb
לְכִיlə·ḵī. . .
Prepositionsecond person feminine singular
בַּבָּ֑יִתbab·bā·yiṯin the houseH1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcPreposition-b, ArticleNounmasculine singular
bayith: a house, a household Repeated at 11 and 16, question and answer. The whole miracle will stay inside this word.
וַתֹּ֗אמֶרwat·tō·merShe answeredH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person feminine singular
לְשִׁפְחָתְךָ֥lə·šip̄·ḥā·ṯə·ḵāYour servantH8198
√ shiphchâh — a female slave (as a member of the household)Preposition-lNounfeminine singular constructsecond person masculine singular
shiphchâh: a female slave of the household The word she chooses for herself is the domestic-bondage word, one step below the ‘ebed she twice called her husband. Her self-naming as a slave is the exact thing she is petitioning to prevent for her boys, and the narrator lets the irony stand without comment.
אֵ֣ין’ênhas nothingH369
√ ʼayin — a non-entityAdverb
ʼayin: a non-entity The absolute (there is not). This same particle returns in v. 6 on her son's lips, and the two nothings bracket the miracle: nothing in the house before, no vessel left after.
כֹל֙ḵōl. . .H3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular
בַּבַּ֔יִתbab·ba·yiṯin the houseH1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcPreposition-b, ArticleNounmasculine singular
כִּ֖יvvvH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
אִם־’im-butH518
√ ʼim — used very widely as demonstrative, lo!Conjunction
אָס֥וּךְ’ā·sūḵa jarH610
√ ʼâçûwk — anointed, iNounmasculine singular construct
ʼâçûwk: an anointing (flask?) A true hapax legomenon. Cambridge presses the social point: this is not the fine oil used for food but the common kind used after a bath, and its presence is itself a measure of her poverty. Ellicott adds that the Jews, like the Greeks and Romans, anointed after bathing. So the one thing she owns is the smallest possible quantity of the cheapest possible grade of the substance Israel used to consecrate kings and priests.
שָֽׁמֶן׃šā·menof oilH8081
√ shemen — grease, especially liquid (as from the olive, often perfumed)Nounmasculine singular
shemen: grease, liquid oil A common noun (176 verses) doing uncommon work here: the same shemen that Elisha's successor-prophet will pour on Jehu's head in 2 Kings 9:3 is what fills a debtor's borrowed pots in 2 Kings 4.
3

“Go,” said Elisha, “borrow empty jars from all your neighbors. Do not gather just a few.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

lə·ḵî way·yō·mer ša·’ă·lî- lāḵ kê·lîm rê·qîm kê·lîm min- ha·ḥūṣ mê·’êṯ kāl- šiḵ·nå̄·ḵē ’al- tam·‘î·ṭî

Word by word14 · parsed
לְכִ֨יlə·ḵîGoH1980
√ hâlak — to walk (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively)VerbQalImperativefeminine singular
וַיֹּ֗אמֶרway·yō·mersaid [Elisha]H559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
שַׁאֲלִי־ša·’ă·lî-borrowH7592
√ shâʼal — to inquireVerbQalImperativefeminine singular
shâʼal: to inquire, to ask The prophet's whole instrumental contribution is an act of asking, performed by the widow, addressed to her neighbors. The miracle is made to pass through her community before it passes through her flask.
לָ֤ךְlāḵ
Prepositionsecond person feminine singular
כֵּלִים֙kê·lîmH3627
√ kᵉlîy — something prepared, iNounmasculine plural
רֵקִ֖יםrê·qîmemptyH7386
√ rêyq — emptyAdjectivemasculine plural
rêyq: empty Set adjacent to kᵉlîy (something prepared). The vessels are prepared precisely by being unfilled. Cambridge reads the borrowing itself as a further sign of indigence which nevertheless carries a promise, and Pulpit turns it forward: God stints not in his gifts.
כֵּלִ֥יםkê·lîmjarsH3627
√ kᵉlîy — something prepared, iNounmasculine plural
מִן־min-fromH4480
√ min — properly, a part ofPreposition
הַח֔וּץha·ḥūṣvvvH2351
√ chûwts — properly, separate by awall, iArticleNounmasculine singular
chûwts: the outside, beyond the wall The spatial word that v. 4 will reverse.
מֵאֵ֖תmê·’êṯvvvH854
√ ʼêth — properly, nearness (used only as a preposition or an adverb), nearPreposition-mDirect object marker
כָּל־kāl-allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
שִׁכְנָכֵיšiḵ·nå̄·ḵēyour neighborsH7934
√ shâkên — a residentNounmasculine plural constructsecond person feminine singular
shâkên: a resident, a neighbor The same root that Exodus 12:4 uses of the neighbor next door who shares the lamb when a household is too small for it, and the Verifier lists that verse here for exactly this pairing with mâ‘aṭ.
אַל־’al-Do notH408
√ ʼal — not (the qualified negation, used as a deprecative)Adverb
תַּמְעִֽיטִי׃tam·‘î·ṭîgather just a fewH4591
√ mâʻaṭ — properly, to pare off, iVerbHifilImperfectsecond person feminine singular
mâ‘aṭ: to pare off, to make few (Hiphil) A causative negative imperative: do not you be the one who diminishes this. Gill, who allows that the prophet spoke under a divine impulse and foresaw the quantity, still leaves the measure in her hands. The size of the miracle is set by the length of her errand, which is the single most exposed nerve in the passage and the point Maclaren will seize on at v. 6.
4

Then go inside, shut the door behind you and your sons, and pour oil into all these jars, setting the full ones aside.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ū·ḇāṯ wə·sā·ḡart had·de·leṯ ba·‘ă·ḏêḵ ū·ḇə·‘aḏ- bā·na·yiḵ wə·yā·ṣaqt ‘al kāl- hā·’êl·leh hak·kê·lîm wə·ham·mā·lê tas·sî·‘î

Word by word13 · parsed
וּבָ֗אתū·ḇāṯThen go insideH935
√ bôwʼ — to go or come (in a wide variety of applications)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConjunctive perfectsecond person feminine singular
וְסָגַ֤רְתְּwə·sā·ḡartshutH5462
√ çâgar — to shut upConjunctive wawVerbQalConjunctive perfectsecond person feminine singular
çâgar: to shut up Conjunctive perfect continuing the imperative force of v. 3. The commentators divide the reasons and are honest that they are guessing: Ellicott and Pulpit say to avoid interruption and publicity, Poole adds the creditor might break in and seize the borrowed vessels before they were filled, K&D says to avoid all needless observation, Benson says to make room for prayer and praise. The text gives the command and no reason.
הַדֶּ֙לֶת֙had·de·leṯthe doorH1817
√ deleth — something swinging, iArticleNounfeminine singular
deleth: something swinging, a door The same noun recurs at v. 5 and again at 2 Kings 4:33, where Elisha shuts the door on himself and a dead boy.
בַּעֲדֵ֣ךְba·‘ă·ḏêḵbehind youH1157
√ bᵉʻad — in up to or over againstPrepositionsecond person feminine singular
bᵉ‘ad: behind, about, on behalf of Enclosure, not just position.
וּבְעַד־ū·ḇə·‘aḏ-andH1157
√ bᵉʻad — in up to or over againstConjunctive wawPreposition
בָּנַ֔יִךְbā·na·yiḵyour sonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural constructsecond person feminine singular
bên: a son Not the yeled of v. 1. Once the prophet's word is given, the children change vocabulary: they are named as sons, and in v. 5 they are working.
וְיָצַ֕קְתְּwə·yā·ṣaqtand pourH3332
√ yâtsaq — properly, to pour out (transitive or intransitive)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConjunctive perfectsecond person feminine singular
yâtsaq: to pour out The consecration verb. What she is told to do with her anointing flask is the gesture a prophet performs over a king, done in a locked room over borrowed crockery. The narrative never calls this an anointing, and it would be an overclaim to say it is one, but the vocabulary of v. 2 (ʼâçûwk, from the root (to anoint)) and of v. 4 (yâtsaq) sits in that field, and 2 Kings 9:3 shows the same words doing that work two chapters later.
עַ֥ל‘aloil intoH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
כָּל־kāl-allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
הָאֵ֑לֶּהhā·’êl·lehtheseH428
√ ʼêl-leh — these or thoseArticlePronouncommon plural
הַכֵּלִ֖יםhak·kê·lîmjarsH3627
√ kᵉlîy — something prepared, iArticleNounmasculine plural
וְהַמָּלֵ֖אwə·ham·mā·lêsetting the full onesH4392
√ mâlêʼ — full (literally or figuratively) or filling (literally)Conjunctive waw, ArticleAdjectivemasculine singular
mâlêʼ: full, filling Singular and definite: (the full one), one vessel at a time.
תַּסִּֽיעִי׃tas·sî·‘îasideH5265
√ nâçaʻ — properly, to pull up, especially the tent-pins, iVerbHifilImperfectsecond person feminine singular
nâsa‘: to pull up tent pins, to set out (Hiphil) A causative of journeying used for lifting a filled jar away. Pulpit works out the logistics: as each vessel is filled it is removed and an empty one substituted, so that the pouring might be continuous. The grammar builds a relay, and the relay is why the sons are in the room.
5

So she left him, and after she had shut the door behind her and her sons, they kept bringing jars to her, and she kept pouring.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wat·tê·leḵ mê·’it·tōw wat·tis·gōr had·de·leṯ ba·‘ă·ḏāh ū·ḇə·‘aḏ bā·ne·hā hêm mag·gi·šîm ’ê·le·hā wə·hî mē·ṣå̄·qɛṯ

Word by word12 · parsed
וַתֵּ֙לֶךְ֙wat·tê·leḵSo she leftH1980
√ hâlak — to walk (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person feminine singular
hâlak: to walk, to go She obeys the imperative of v. 3 without a recorded word of reply. Cambridge marks this: her sons imitate her obedience, and the narrative rewards it.
מֵֽאִתּ֔וֹmê·’it·tōwhimH854
√ ʼêth — properly, nearness (used only as a preposition or an adverb), nearPreposition-mDirect object markerthird person masculine singular
וַתִּסְגֹּ֣רwat·tis·gōrand after she had shutH5462
√ çâgar — to shut upConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person feminine singular
çâgar: to shut up The command of v. 4 executed verbatim, the standard Hebrew signal that obedience was exact.
הַדֶּ֔לֶתhad·de·leṯthe doorH1817
√ deleth — something swinging, iArticleNounfeminine singular
בַּעֲדָ֖הּba·‘ă·ḏāhbehind herH1157
√ bᵉʻad — in up to or over againstPrepositionthird person feminine singular
וּבְעַ֣דū·ḇə·‘aḏandH1157
√ bᵉʻad — in up to or over againstConjunctive wawPreposition
בָּנֶ֑יהָbā·ne·hāher sonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural constructthird person feminine singular
הֵ֛םhêmtheyH1992
√ hêm — they (only used when emphatic)Pronounthird person masculine plural
מַגִּשִׁ֥יםmag·gi·šîmkept bringing [jars]H5066
√ nâgash — to be or come (causatively, bring) near (for any purpose)VerbHifilParticiplemasculine plural
nâgash: to come or bring near (Hiphil) Durative participle. The boys whom the creditor came to take (v. 1) are here the ones bringing near, doing the work of the house instead of a stranger's work. The same verb returns as an imperative on the mother's lips in v. 6 and is answered with (there is no more).
אֵלֶ֖יהָ’ê·le·hāto herH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPrepositionthird person feminine singular
וְהִ֥יאwə·hîand sheH1931
√ hûwʼ — he (she or it)Conjunctive wawPronounthird person feminine singular
hûwʼ: she (emphatic pronoun) Set against hêm in a deliberate pairing: they, and she.
מֵיצָקֶת׃mē·ṣå̄·qɛṯkept pouringH3332
√ yâtsaq — properly, to pour out (transitive or intransitive)VerbHifilParticiplefeminine singular
yâtsaq: to pour (participle, hapax form) The form itself is disputed (K&D defends the Kethib against the Keri) and unparalleled. The verse holds the miracle in an unbroken present: not (she poured and it was done) but (and she pouring), a continuous action with no stated end until the vessels run out.
6

When all the jars were full, she said to her son, “Bring me another.” But he replied, “There are no more jars.” Then the oil stopped flowing.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

way·hî hak·kê·lîm kim·lōṯ wat·tō·mer ’el- bə·nāh hag·gî·šāh ’ê·lay ‘ō·wḏ ke·lî way·yō·mer ’ê·le·hā ’ên ‘ō·wḏ ke·lî haš·šā·men way·ya·‘ă·mōḏ

Word by word17 · parsed
וַיְהִ֣י׀way·hîWhenH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
הַכֵּלִ֗יםhak·kê·lîmall the jarsH3627
√ kᵉlîy — something prepared, iArticleNounmasculine plural
כִּמְלֹ֣אתkim·lōṯwere fullH4390
√ mâlêʼ — to fill or (intransitively) be full of, in a wide application (literally and figuratively)Preposition-kVerbQalInfinitive construct
mâlêʼ: to fill, to be full The root runs the pericope: the adjective mâlêʼ (H4392) at v. 4 for the single full vessel carried aside, the infinitive construct here for the filling of them all. What reaches fullness is always the borrowed capacity, never the source, and the narrative never once measures the oil. Contrast 1 Kings 17:16, where the narrator does report of Elijah's widow that the cruse of oil did not fail; here nothing whatever is said about the flask, only about the pots.
וַתֹּ֤אמֶרwat·tō·mershe saidH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person feminine singular
אֶל־’el-toH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPreposition
בְּנָהּ֙bə·nāhher sonH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine singular constructthird person feminine singular
הַגִּ֨ישָׁהhag·gî·šāhBring meH5066
√ nâgash — to be or come (causatively, bring) near (for any purpose)VerbHifilImperativemasculine singularthird person feminine singular
nâgash: bring near (Hiphil imperative) Addressed to one son; Cambridge observes that the LXX has the plural here and in the reply, and judges the Hebrew singular far more natural, since the request would be made to one boy though both were helping.
אֵלַ֥י’ê·lay. . .H413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPrepositionfirst person common singular
עוֹד֙‘ō·wḏanotherH5750
√ ʻôwd — properly, iteration or continuanceAdverb
‘ôwd: iteration, continuance, yet more The same adverb appears twice, in her request and in his refusal. It is the hinge word of the verse: (yet one more) meets (there is not yet).
כֶּ֔לִיke·lî. . .H3627
√ kᵉlîy — something prepared, iNounmasculine singular
וַיֹּ֣אמֶרway·yō·merBut he repliedH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
אֵלֶ֔יהָ’ê·le·hā. . .H413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPrepositionthird person feminine singular
אֵ֥ין’ênThere are noH369
√ ʼayin — a non-entityAdverb
ʼayin: a non-entity The boy's answer is the exact particle of her own confession in v. 2. The lack has migrated from oil to vessels, which is the entire theological content of the miracle.
ע֖וֹד‘ō·wḏmoreH5750
√ ʻôwd — properly, iteration or continuanceAdverb
כֶּ֑לִיke·lîjarsH3627
√ kᵉlîy — something prepared, iNounmasculine singular
הַשָּֽׁמֶן׃haš·šā·menThen the oilH8081
√ shemen — grease, especially liquid (as from the olive, often perfumed)ArticleNounmasculine singular
shemen: oil Definite for the first time here, (the oil): no longer her scrap of anointing grease but the thing itself, now a stock large enough to clear a debt.
וַֽיַּעֲמֹ֖דway·ya·‘ă·mōḏstopped flowingH5975
√ ʻâmad — to stand, in various relations (literal and figurative, intransitive and transitive)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
‘âmad: to stand The strangeness is worth holding. Hebrew does not say the oil failed or was spent; it says it stood, the posture verb, as Joshua 10:13 says of the sun and moon in the parallel Cambridge cites. JFB reads the stopping as purposive: the benevolent object having been accomplished. Pulpit and Poole both read it as the refusal of waste, God would not work miracles unnecessarily. Maclaren turns the same halt into a law of the spiritual life, that the giving stops when the bringing stops. The Hebrew verb supports all three readings and asserts none of them.
7

She went and told the man of God, and he said, “Go, sell the oil, and pay your debt. Then you and your sons can live on the remainder.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wat·tā·ḇō wat·tag·gêḏ lə·’îš hā·’ĕ·lō·hîm way·yō·mer lə·ḵî miḵ·rî ’eṯ- haš·še·men wə·šal·lə·mî ’eṯ- niš·yē·ḵī wə·’at bə·nē·ḵī ṯiḥ·yî ban·nō·w·ṯār

Word by word16 · parsed
וַתָּבֹ֗אwat·tā·ḇōShe wentH935
√ bôwʼ — to go or come (in a wide variety of applications)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person feminine singular
וַתַּגֵּד֙wat·tag·gêḏand toldH5046
√ nâgad — properly, to front, iConjunctive wawVerbHifilConsecutive imperfectthird person feminine singular
nâgad: to front, to declare (Hiphil) The same causative verb Elisha used to her in v. 2 (tell me) now describes her telling him. The report closes a circuit the prophet opened with a question.
לְאִ֣ישׁlə·’îšthe manH376
√ ʼîysh — a man as an individual or a male personPreposition-lNounmasculine singular construct
הָאֱלֹהִ֔יםhā·’ĕ·lō·hîmof GodH430
√ ʼĕlôhîym — gods in the ordinary senseArticleNounmasculine plural
ʼĕlôhîym: God With the article, and in the title (man of the God). Cambridge and Pulpit both note she would not dispose of the oil without his direction, feeling that the unexpected supply could not be regarded as her own property.
וַיֹּ֗אמֶרway·yō·merand he saidH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
לְכִי֙lə·ḵîGoH1980
√ hâlak — to walk (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively)VerbQalImperativefeminine singular
מִכְרִ֣יmiḵ·rîsellH4376
√ mâkar — to sell, literally (as merchandise, a daughter in marriage, into slavery), or figuratively (to surrender)VerbQalImperativefeminine singular
mâkar: to sell The Verifier's candidates put this root beside nâshâh at Isaiah 50:1 and 24:2, where selling is what is done to people for debt. Here the verb is turned: she sells the oil so that her sons are not sold.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
הַשֶּׁ֔מֶןhaš·še·menthe oilH8081
√ shemen — grease, especially liquid (as from the olive, often perfumed)ArticleNounmasculine singular
וְשַׁלְּמִ֖יwə·šal·lə·mîand payH7999
√ shâlam — to be safe (in mind, body or estate)Conjunctive wawVerbPielImperativefeminine singular
shâlam: to be whole, to make good (Piel) Benson and Poole both draw the same order of duties from the imperative: first do justice to others, and then take care of thyself and children. Henry makes it a rule of the Christian religion that every just debt be paid, and not of constraint but for conscience sake. The Hebrew supports the order without moralizing it: the debt is made whole first, and only then is there a remainder to live on.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
נִשְׁיֵכִיniš·yē·ḵīyour debtH5386
√ nᵉshîy — a debtNounmasculine singular constructsecond person feminine singular
nᵉshîy: a debt The nominal form of the rare root H5383 that names the creditor in v. 1, appearing here for the only time in this unit.
וְאַ֣תְּwə·’atThen youH859
√ ʼattâh — thou and thee, or (plural) ye and youConjunctive wawPronounsecond person feminine singular
בְּנֵיכִיbə·nē·ḵīand your sonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural constructsecond person feminine singular
תִֽחְיִ֖יṯiḥ·yîcan liveH2421
√ châyâh — to live, whether literally or figurativelyVerbQalImperfectsecond person feminine singular
châyâh: to live Qal imperfect 2fs. The verb of v. 1 was (to die); this is its answer. Between them stands a flask of oil.
בַּנּוֹתָֽר׃פban·nō·w·ṯāron the remainderH3498
√ yâthar — to jut over or exceedPreposition-b, ArticleVerbNifalParticiplemasculine singular
yâthar: to jut over, to exceed A Niphal participle: that which is left over. The miracle is sized to exceed the debt. Gill draws out the arithmetic plainly, that there was enough to pay the debt and somewhat remaining, and Geneva reads the surplus as God providing not only for his servant's reputation but for the wife and children left behind.

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. The shriek and the creditor — 4:1

The Elisha miracle cycle opens not with a king or an army but with צָעֲקָה (tsâ‘aq, H6817), a verb the lexicon glosses as (to shriek). A widow of the prophetic guild screams at the prophet. Ellicott draws the sociological inference that governs the whole scene: those who were heads of families must have had their own separate homes, so the sons of the prophets were not a cloister but a company of men with wives, houses and creditors; Pulpit and Cambridge say the same. The woman's plea is built on one word used three times: her husband was twice ‘aḇdəḵā, thy servant, and the creditor has come to take her boys la‘ăḇāḏîm, for slaves. Barnes, Cambridge, JFB and K&D all record that this was legal, Leviticus 25:39-41 permitting the seizure of an insolvent debtor's children until the jubilee; Pulpit adds that Greek and Roman practice was the same and Ellicott that the ancient Roman law was harsher, having no jubilee at all. Two traditions hang on the verse and neither is in it. The Targum, Josephus and Ephrem Syrus identify the dead man as Obadiah of 1 Kings 18; Cambridge weighs it and finds there is nothing to connect the two narratives together except one shared self-description, and Pulpit judges that no dependence can be placed on it. Gill, reporting the same tradition, adds the further Jewish notion that the creditor was Jehoram son of Ahab. Geneva, for its part, turns the husband's fear of YHWH into a verdict on the debt: he did not fall into debt by carelessness or excess but by the hand of the Lord, and Benson and Poole press further, that his poverty was the price of refusing the king's worship. The Hebrew sets the fear of YHWH and the debt side by side and offers no causal word between them.

ii. Nothing in the house but an anointing — 4:2-4:3

Elisha's first move is a question, not a power: מָה אֶעֱשֶׂה־לָּךְ, what shall I do for thee, which Benson and Poole both hear as a confession of the prophet's own poverty, how shall I relieve thee, who am myself poor. Her answer is the pivot of the unit and the hardest word in it. אָסוּךְ (H610) is a hapax; Barnes states the fact without decoration, the word used occurs only in this passage. K&D derives it from sûk, to anoint, and reads an anointing flask, a small vessel for the oil necessary for anointing the body. Ellicott reports Keil's sense, an anointing in or with oil, prefers to take the word as a verb, and cites the Vulgate's parum olei, quo ungar. Cambridge presses the social reading: not the finest oil used for food but the common kind used after a bath, so that even the grade of her oil measures her destitution. Whatever the word means, the arithmetic is fixed by אֵין כֹל, there is not any thing at all. Against that zero the prophet sets a single negative imperative, אַל־תַּמְעִיטִי, which K&D expands as make not few, sc. to beg, and Ellicott as do not scant, or stint. Cambridge catches the double edge, that borrowing is another sign of indigence and that the command to borrow many gave promise of the coming help; Pulpit generalizes it, God stints not in his gifts. Gill alone supplies a mechanism, that the prophet spoke under a divine impulse, foreseeing by a spirit of prophecy that a large quantity of oil would be given her. The text is more reticent: the quantity is left in the widow's hands and in her neighbors' cupboards.

iii. Behind the shut door — 4:4-4:5

Three words govern the miracle's setting, סָגַר, דֶּלֶת and בַּעַד, shut, door, behind, and the Verifier finds the same triple at Isaiah 26:20 and again at 2 Kings 4:33, where Elisha will shut a door on himself and a dead child. Why the door is shut, no commentator can say from the text, and their disagreement is instructive: Ellicott says to avoid disturbance from without and perhaps because publicity was undesirable, comparing our Lord's injunction of secrecy on those whom He healed; Poole strings four possibilities together with (partly ... partly), including the sharply practical worry that a creditor might break in and seize the borrowed vessels before they were filled; K&D says to avoid all needless observation; Benson wants room for prayer and praise; Cambridge reads it as a test of faith, since it was hard to conceive that one vessel, much less a great number, could be filled from her anointing pot. The verbs in v. 4 are worth their weight. וְיָצַקְתְּ (yâtsaq, H3332) is the pouring of consecration, the same root that pours oil on Jehu's head at 2 Kings 9:3 where the Verifier also finds shemen and deleth; תַּסִּיעִי (nâsa‘, H5265) is properly the pulling up of tent pins, which K&D renders let that which is filled be put on one side and assigns to the sons. Then v. 5 abandons finite verbs altogether. Ellicott gives the literal force, they were bringing to her, and she was pouring continually, adding that the participle mĕyaççèqeth occurs only here and that she did not leave her pouring; K&D defends that odd form as a participle Piel, quite appropriate as an emphatic form, against the Keri's easier Hiphil. Pulpit notices the quiet competence of it, that the method was left to the woman and her sons and so there was no confusion nor hurry, and Cambridge that the widow's unquestioning obedience, in which her sons also imitated her, has its reward. The boys the creditor came to take are the ones carrying the vessels.

iv. The oil stood — 4:6-4:7

The miracle ends on a word nobody expects: וַיַּעֲמֹד הַשֶּׁמֶן, and the oil stood. K&D renders it flatly, then the oil stood, i.e., it ceased to flow; Ellicott glosses the Hebrew as stood, halted, stopped, records Bähr's attempt to make it mean continued, and reports that the LXX puts (sons) in the plural here against the Hebrew singular, which Cambridge judges far more natural. The halt is caused by the same particle of non-existence, אֵין, that the widow used of her own house in v. 2. Nothing had become the boundary condition of the gift, and now the nothing is on the other side: there is no vessel left. JFB reads the stop as purposive, the benevolent object for which the miracle had been wrought having been accomplished; Poole and Pulpit read it as a refusal of waste, that God would not work miracles unnecessarily; Henry turns it into doctrine, that we are never straitened in God but all our straitness is in ourselves, and that the Redeemer's all-sufficiency will only be stayed when no more apply to him for salvation. Maclaren builds a whole sermon on it and is honest that he does so by a little gentle violence to the incident, since he does not suppose it had any symbolical intention. His conclusion, that God keeps giving Himself as long as we bring that into which He can pour Himself, is application avowedly added to the text, and is the better for saying so. The last verse restores the narrator's own title, אִישׁ הָאֱלֹהִים, the man of the God, and gives three imperatives: sell, make whole thy debt, live. Benson, Poole and Henry all draw the same order from them, first do justice to others and then take care of thyself and children. Cambridge fixes the referent of הַנּוֹתָר against the LXX: the oil was all to be sold, and it is the money left over, not leftover oil, that sustains them. Geneva sees the double provision, that God kept his servant's doctrine and profession without slander by clearing the debt, and also provided for the wife and children.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested. Read the unit by its two occurrences of אֵין. In v. 2 the nothing is hers: there is not any thing at all in the house. In v. 6 the nothing belongs to the neighbors' cupboards: there is not yet a vessel. Between those two negations nothing is said about how much oil there was, and that silence looks deliberate. The source is never measured. What is measured, twice, is capacity. The one command in the unit with a negative on it is not (do not doubt) and not (do not fear) but אַל־תַּמְעִיטִי, do not make few, an imperative about the size of an errand among neighbors. So the story does not locate the limit in the widow's faith, nor in the prophet's power, nor in God's willingness. It locates the limit in the number of empty containers a poor woman was willing to go out and ask for. Two further things follow from the Hebrew rather than from piety. First, the vessels are borrowed, which means the miracle passes through the community before it reaches the debt: the neighbors who lent the pots are the unnamed instruments of the deliverance and never learn what happened in that room. Second, the vocabulary of the flask (ʼâçûwk, from the root to anoint) and of the pouring (yâtsaq, the consecration verb of 2 Kings 9:3) belongs to the language of anointing, yet the narrative never says an anointing occurred, and it would be an overclaim to say it did. What can be said is that the substance Israel used to set apart kings and priests is here poured out, behind a shut door, to keep two boys out of slavery, and the narrator considers that a proper use of it. Henry's instinct is right, that Elisha's miracles were acts of real charity. The text's own addition is sharper: the miracle's ceiling was set by an errand, and the errand was the widow's to run.

The oil was never limited by the flask. It was limited by how many empty vessels she was willing to ask for.

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The creditor at the door: the law that made this legal verbal / quotation: confirmed

The participle that names the man at the widow's door, הַנֹּשֶׁה (nâshâh, H5383), is rare: the Verifier finds it in only eleven verses in the Hebrew Bible, and nearly every one of them is debt legislation. Exodus 22:25 forbids being as a creditor to the poor of God's people; Deuteronomy 15:2 releases what the creditor has lent in the seventh year; Deuteronomy 24:10-11 forbids the creditor to enter the debtor's house to fetch the pledge, making him stand outside (חוּץ, H2351, the very word Elisha uses in v. 3 for where the vessels must come from). Barnes, Cambridge, JFB, Pulpit and K&D all note that Leviticus 25:39-41 allowed the children of an insolvent debtor to be taken as bondservants until the jubilee, so the creditor here is exercising a right, not committing a crime. The narrative does not accuse him. It simply removes his grounds.

Exodus 22:25 · Deuteronomy 15:2 · Deuteronomy 24:10 · Deuteronomy 24:11

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H5383 nâshâh, a rare root standing in only 11 verses; Deuteronomy 24:11 additionally shares H2351 chûwts (in 158 vv). No quotation is claimed in either direction: the link is the rare creditor-participle itself, which ties this narrative to the pledge law.

Sold for a debt: the prophets turn the same word on Israel verbal / quotation: confirmed

The two roots that frame this unit, נָשָׁה (to lend on security, H5383) and מָכַר (to sell, H4376), meet again in Isaiah. At Isaiah 24:2 the coming judgment levels every social pair, and the Verifier finds all three of this unit's social words there together, the creditor, the maidservant (שִׁפְחָה, H8198, the word the widow uses of herself in v. 2) and the act of selling. At Isaiah 50:1 the LORD asks which of his creditors it was to whom he sold his people, and answers that they sold themselves for their iniquities. In 2 Kings 4 the same two verbs run the opposite way: a widow sells the oil so that a creditor cannot take her sons. The prophetic indictment and this small domestic reversal are built from the same three words.

Isaiah 24:2 · Isaiah 50:1

basis: Verifier: Isaiah 24:2 shares H5383 nâshâh (rare, in 11 vv), H8198 shiphchâh (in 58 vv), H4376 mâkar (in 74 vv); Isaiah 50:1 shares H5383 and H4376. The verbal tier rests on the rarity of nâshâh; there is no citation of Kings by Isaiah and none is claimed.

Nehemiah's brothers, David's enemy: the same creditor elsewhere verbal / quotation: confirmed

The rare creditor-root surfaces twice more where children are the security. Nehemiah 5:1-11 is the public form of this private scene: Jews putting sons and daughters into bondage for grain and taxes, and Nehemiah using the verb of v. 1 when he tells the nobles to leave off this usury (Nehemiah 5:10) and to restore the fields and the hundredth part (5:11). Pulpit draws the comparison explicitly at 2 Kings 4:1. Psalm 109:11 asks the reverse: let the creditor seize all that he has and strangers plunder his labor, followed by a curse on the man's children and a wish that his wife be a widow. Jeremiah 15:10 uses the word for a man who has neither lent nor borrowed and is cursed anyway. The same root serves a reform, an imprecation and a lament; here it serves a rescue.

Nehemiah 5:10 · Nehemiah 5:11 · Psalm 109:11 · Jeremiah 15:10

basis: Verifier: all four verses share H5383 nâshâh with 2 Kings 4:1, a root attested in only 11 verses. The link is lexical and thematic, not a quotation, and the four contexts differ sharply in purpose.

Shut the door behind thee structural / thematic: confirmed

Three ordinary words, סָגַר (H5462), דֶּלֶת (H1817) and בַּעַד (H1157), occur together in v. 4 and again in v. 5, and the Verifier finds the same three together in only two other places worth naming here. Isaiah 26:20 tells the people to enter their chambers and shut the doors about them, hiding for a little moment until the indignation passes. 2 Kings 4:33 is Elisha himself, shutting the door on the two of them, himself and the Shunammite's dead son, before the boy breathes. 2 Kings 6:32 shows him ordering a door shut against a king's messenger. A shut door in the Elisha narratives is the standing setting for what God does without spectators. Ellicott compares our Lord's exclusion of the crowd in Luke 8, which is a pattern match across Testaments, not a citation.

Isaiah 26:20 · 2 Kings 4:33 · 2 Kings 6:32

basis: Verifier: Isaiah 26:20 and 2 Kings 4:33 each share H5462 çâgar (in 87 vv), H1817 deleth (in 78 vv) and H1157 bᵉ‘ad (in 82 vv); 2 Kings 6:32 shares H5462 plus H477 ʼĔlîyshâʻ. Every one of these lexemes is common, so the basis is the recurring three-word collocation and shared motif, not a rare word. Deliberately not tiered verbal.

The other widow, the other jar structural / thematic: confirmed

Ellicott opens his note on this unit by directing the reader to compare 1 Kings 17:12 and following, and Benson closes his by saying that this most signal miracle is like that which Elijah had wrought for the widow of Zarephath. The parallels are structural and exact: a widow at the end of her provisions, a named vessel of oil, a prophet's word, a supply that does not fail while it is needed, two sons or one son whose life hangs on it, and a prophet who is Elijah in one case and his successor in the other. The narrator of 2 Kings never says so. The pairing is a reader's observation, first recorded here by the commentators, and it belongs to the larger pattern by which Elisha's acts double Elijah's.

1 Kings 17:12 · 1 Kings 17:16

basis: Not in the Verifier's candidate list: the two narratives share few lexemes and no rare one, so no verbal basis exists. The recorded basis is the explicit comparison drawn by Ellicott (Comp. 1 Kings 17:12 seq.) and by Benson, plus a shared narrative structure of widow, oil vessel, prophet's word and unfailing supply.

Ten thousand talents and two sons: the debt parable across the Testaments structural / thematic: confirmed

Four of this unit's commentators send the reader to the same New Testament place. Ellicott compares Matthew 18:26, Cambridge and JFB cite Matthew 18:25, and Gill refers his own note there. In that parable the lord commands that the man be sold, and his wife and children, and payment be made, which is the precise legal situation of 2 Kings 4:1 stated by Jesus as a background assumption his hearers would recognize. The Gospel does not quote Kings and Kings does not anticipate the Gospel. What they share is the institution, servitude for debt, and the direction each narrative moves in: one widow's debt discharged by a gift she did not earn, one servant's debt forgiven and then refused to his fellow.

Matthew 18:25 · Matthew 18:26

basis: Cross-Testament Greek to Hebrew: shared Strong's numbers are impossible by definition, so no verbal tier is available regardless of how close the situations are. The basis is a shared legal institution (servitude for debt) attested in both texts, and the comparison is recorded independently by Ellicott, Cambridge, JFB and Gill.

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

The vessel and the fullness ancient/widely-held

⚙ Gill states the figure openly and marks it as a figure: this oil may be an emblem of the grace that flows from the fulness of it in Christ, which will be always flowing as long as there is a vessel of salvation or faith in any to receive it, and he sends the reader to the empty lamps of Matthew 25 and to the anointing of 1 John 2:20. Henry, working the same verse, reaches the same shape without allegory: we are never straitened in God, all our straitness is in ourselves, and the Redeemer's all-sufficiency will only be stayed from supplying the wants of sinners when no more apply to him for salvation. John 1:16 gives the language the Hebrew scene lacks, of his fullness we have all received, grace upon grace. The reading is old and widely held among these commentators, and it should be held the way Gill holds it: as an emblem drawn from the text, not a meaning claimed by the text. 2 Kings never says the oil signifies anything.

John 1:16 · 1 John 2:20 · Matthew 25:3

What Elisha did behind a door, the Son did on a hillside ancient/widely-held

⚙ Henry's first sentence on this unit is the redemptive-historical claim in miniature: Elisha's miracles were acts of real charity, Christ's were so, not only great wonders but great favours to those for whom they were wrought. The structural resemblance to the feedings is close. A prophet asks what is already on hand, a small and inadequate quantity is named, it is distributed until every container is filled, and there is a remainder. The Hebrew of v. 7 even ends on הַנּוֹתָר (yâthar, H3498), that which is left over, the same idea the Gospels fix on when the fragments are gathered up so that nothing is lost. That last echo is an observation about ideas, not about words: Greek and Hebrew share no Strong's numbers, and no verbal link is claimed. Luke 4:25-26 shows Jesus himself placing the parallel Elijah widow narrative at the center of his own commission, which gives this kind of reading a warrant from within the Gospels rather than only from later readers.

Luke 4:25 · Luke 4:26 · Mark 6:42 · John 6:12

The debt made whole, and the sons who do not go novel

⚙ The unit's last imperative to the widow is וְשַׁלְּמִי (Piel of shâlam, H7999), make thy debt whole, from the root of shâlôm. The result is that two boys who were legally forfeit stay free, and the narrative closes on the verb תִחְיִי, live, answering the מֵת, is dead, of v. 1. Colossians 2:14 speaks of the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, blotted out and nailed to the cross, and Galatians 4:4-7 of those under bondage receiving the adoption of sons. The pattern is the same: a debt discharged from outside the debtor's means, with freedom from servitude as the consequence. This is an honest theological correspondence, not a claim the commentators make. Ellicott, Cambridge, JFB and Gill go only as far as Matthew 18:25, the shared legal custom. Extending it to the atonement is this tool's reading, and it should be weighed as such.

Colossians 2:14 · Galatians 4:5 · Galatians 4:7

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Alexander Maclaren, Expositions of Holy Scripture (c. 1905)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

⚙ Honesty notes for this unit. (1) The central noun of v. 2, אָסוּךְ (H610), is a hapax legomenon; Barnes states that the word used occurs only in this passage. (A jar of oil) is a reasonable English guess, not a known meaning. K&D reads an anointing flask from the root sûk; Ellicott reports Keil's (an anointing in or with oil) and himself prefers a verbal sense, citing the Vulgate's parum olei, quo ungar. Nothing in this unit's synthesis should be taken as settling that question.

(2) Two text-critical points are recorded by the commentators rather than resolved. At v. 5 the form מֵיצָקֶת is unparalleled; K&D defends it as a participle Piel, quite appropriate as an emphatic form, and calls the Keri's Hiphil an unnecessary alteration. At v. 7 the sequence וְאַתְּ בְּנֵיכִי is asyndetic; K&D judges it very harsh and thinks a connecting waw has dropped out, and Ellicott says clearly (and) has fallen out, noting that many manuscripts and all the versions supply it. BSB follows the emended reading silently. K&D also records, and rejects, L. de Dieu's proposal to repoint the pronoun so as to read (live with thy sons).

(3) Septuagint divergences: at v. 6 the LXX has the plural (sons) and a plural verb, which Cambridge attributes to assimilation and judges less natural than the Hebrew; Ellicott records the same. At v. 7 the LXX reads that they live on the remaining oil, which Cambridge rejects, since the oil was all to be sold and the surplus is money.

(4) Provenance of traditions: the identification of the dead man with Obadiah of 1 Kings 18 comes from the Targum, Josephus (Antiquities IX.4.2) and Ephrem Syrus, not from the text; Ellicott, Cambridge, Pulpit and Gill all report it and all treat it with reserve, Pulpit saying no dependence can be placed on it. The further notion that the creditor was Jehoram son of Ahab is reported by Gill as a common notion of the Jews. Neither is used as a fact in this synthesis.

(5) Interpretive additions marked as such: Geneva, Benson and Poole supply a cause for the husband's poverty (that he refused the king's worship, or that the debt came by the hand of the Lord) which the Hebrew does not state. Gill supplies the prophet's foreknowledge of the quantity of oil. Maclaren, at v. 6, explicitly tells his hearers he is doing a little gentle violence to the incident and does not suppose it had any symbolical intention, and his (bring the vessel) application is preserved here as avowed application.

(6) Interlinear notes: the word list for v. 3 shows כֵּלִים at both index 4 and index 6, reflecting the Berean alignment against BSB's word order rather than a doubling in the Hebrew clause. A few items carry no Strong's number in the source data (v. 1 index 26, v. 2 indices 2, 7 and 10, v. 3 index 3); these are pronominal suffixes and prepositions, and no note in this synthesis depends on them. Cambridge notes that the word for the children in v. 1 (yeled) is not the word used in v. 4 (bēn), a distinction the Revised Version marks and most English versions do not.

(7) Cross-Testament links in this unit (Matthew 18, Luke 4, the feedings, Colossians 2) cannot carry a verbal tier: Greek and Hebrew share no Strong's numbers, so every such link here is tiered structural or marked as this tool's own reading.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)