The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
David Flees Jerusalem
2 Samuel 15:13–29 — David Flees Jerusalem. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
13Then a messenger came to David and reported, “The hearts of the men of Israel are with Absalom.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ham·mag·gîḏ way·yā·ḇō ’el- dā·wiḏ lê·mōr leḇ- ’îš yiś·rā·’êl hā·yāh ’a·ḥă·rê ’aḇ·šā·lō·wm
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-came the-one-telling unto David, to-say: “Has-become the-heart of-the-man-of Israel after Absalom.”
Where the English smooths the original
Or, fourthly, The just and holy God, who ordered and overruled all these things for David’s chastisement, and the instruction and terror of sinners in all future ages.Poole lists four causes for the revolt (David's failings, the people's fickleness, Absalom's charm and birthright, and God's hand) and deliberately puts God last, as the cause that governs the other three.
David was perhaps afraid that Jerusalem might fall into Absalom's power through treachery, and therefore resolved to fly as speedily as possible, not only in order to prevent a terrible massacre, but also to give his own faithful adherents time to assemble.
Perhaps one of the two hundred that went with Absalom, ignorant of his design; which, when discovered, he disapproved of, and got away from him, and came to David, and informed him how things wereA conjecture, and Gill marks it as one: the text names no messenger.
14And David said to all the servants with him in Jerusalem, “Arise and let us flee, or we will not escape from Absalom! We must leave quickly, or he will soon overtake us, heap disaster on us, and put the city to the sword.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
dā·wiḏ way·yō·mer lə·ḵāl ‘ă·ḇā·ḏāw ’ă·šer- ’it·tōw ḇî·rū·šā·lim qū·mū wə·niḇ·rā·ḥāh kî lā·nū ṯih·yeh- lō- p̄ə·lê·ṭāh mip·pə·nê ’aḇ·šā·lō·wm lā·le·ḵeṯ ma·hă·rū pen- yə·ma·hêr wə·hiś·śi·ḡā·nū wə·hid·dî·aḥ hā·rā·‘āh ‘ā·lê·nū ’eṯ- wə·hik·kāh hā·‘îr lə·p̄î- ḥā·reḇ
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-said David to-all his-servants who-were with-him in-Jerusalem: “Arise, and-let-us-flee, for there-will-not-be for-us an-escape from-before Absalom. Hasten to-go, lest he-hasten and-overtake-us and-thrust the-evil down upon-us and-smite the-city to-the-mouth-of the-sword.”
Where the English smooths the original
The sequel abundantly proved the wisdom of David’s course. Ahithophel also ( 2Samuel 17:1-2 ) and Hushai ( 2Samuel 17:7-13 ) recognised that delay would be fatal to Absalom’s cause. His rebellion was thoroughly unreasonable, and must lose ground with time given for reflection. By this course also much of the horror of civil war was averted, and Jerusalem saved from “the edge of the sword.”
For the moment David’s courage seems to have failed him. The calamities predicted by Nathan (ch. 2 Samuel 12:11 ), stared him in the face: a sack of Jerusalem with all the horrors of civil war seemed imminent: he could not face them, and retreat proved in the end to be the wisest course.Cambridge holds both readings at once: the flight was a failure of nerve and the right move.
it is much that a man of such courage and valour as David should be so intimidated at once as to make a flight as soon as he heard of a conspiracy forming against himGill is the sharpest critic of David here, twice calling the flight a panic. Set against Henry, who calls it penitence, the two readings frame the interpretive question of the whole unit.
15The king’s servants replied, “Whatever our lord the king decides, we are your servants.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ham·me·leḵ ‘aḇ·ḏê- way·yō·mə·rū ’el- ham·me·leḵ kə·ḵōl ’ă·šer- ’ă·ḏō·nî ham·me·leḵ hin·nêh yiḇ·ḥar ‘ă·ḇā·ḏe·ḵā
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-said the-servants-of the-king unto the-king: “According-to-all that shall-choose my-lord the-king — behold, thy-servants.”
Where the English smooths the original
Or, as the word stands in the original, in an abrupt, half-finished sentence, even more pathetic, ‘According to all that my lord the king shall appoint, behold thy servants.’Maclaren preaches this verse as a pattern of discipleship; the sermon's force depends on the verbless Hebrew clause he is quoting.
He compelled none; those whose hearts were with Absalom, to Absalom let them go, and so shall their doom be. Thus Christ enlists none but willing followers.
These were the officers of David's court and household, numerous enough to hamper his movements, but not enough to protect him.
16Then the king set out, and his entire household followed him. But he left behind ten concubines to take care of the palace.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ham·me·leḵ way·yê·ṣê wə·ḵāl bê·ṯōw bə·raḡ·lāw ham·me·leḵ ’êṯ way·ya·‘ă·zōḇ ‘e·śer nā·šîm pi·laḡ·šîm liš·mōr hab·bā·yiṯ
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-went-out the-king and-all his-house at-his-feet; and-the-king left ten women, concubines, to-keep the-house.
Where the English smooths the original
which the king probably chose to do, that he might humble himself under the hand of God; might encourage his adherents in this hard and comfortless march; and might move compassion in his people toward him.
but this seems to be ordered by the overruling providence of God, to bring about what was threatened him, 2 Samuel 12:11 ; and it is much he had not thought of it; but it was hid from his eyes, that it might be fulfilled.Gill assigns David's oversight to providence; that is his inference from 2 Samuel 12:11, not a statement of this verse.
There is none, we may add, that combines so many of David’s characteristics—his patience, his high-spirited religion, his generosity, his calculation: we miss only his daring courage.Cambridge is quoting Stanley's Lectures, not speaking in its own voice; the question that follows about parental grief or bitter remorse is Stanley's.
17So the king set out with all the people following him. He stopped at the last house,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ham·me·leḵ way·yê·ṣê wə·ḵāl hā·‘ām bə·raḡ·lāw way·ya·‘am·ḏū bêṯ ham·mer·ḥāq
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-went-out the-king and-all the-people at-his-feet; and-they-stood at-Beth-ha-Merḥaq, the-house-of-the-far-distance.
Where the English smooths the original
Better, halted at the far house, i.e., at a definite place known by this name, probably the last house on the outskirts of the city before the road crossed the Kidron. Here David mustered his forces and made the arrangements for his flight.
"The Far House" - so we may translate this proper name - was probably not a dwelling, but a pavilion overlooking the Kidron valley
Either to rest and refresh themselves a little; or rather, in expectation of others who should or would come after him, that they might march away in a considerable body, which might both defend the king, and invite others to come in to their assistance.
18and all his servants marched past him—all the Cherethites and Pelethites, and six hundred Gittites who had followed him from Gath.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·ḵāl ‘ă·ḇā·ḏāw ‘ō·ḇə·rîm ‘al- yā·ḏōw wə·ḵāl hak·kə·rê·ṯî wə·ḵāl hap·pə·lê·ṯî wə·ḵāl šêš- mê·’ō·wṯ hag·git·tîm ’îš ’ă·šer- bā·’ū ḇə·raḡ·lōw mig·gaṯ ‘ō·ḇə·rîm ‘al- pə·nê ham·me·leḵ
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-all his-servants passing-over beside his-hand, and-all the-Cherethite and-all the-Pelethite, and-all the-Gittites, six hundred man who had-come at-his-foot from-Gath, passing-over before the-face-of the-king.
Where the English smooths the original
But it is possible that we should follow the LXX. in reading Gibbôrîm in place of GittitesCambridge prints the Septuagint's longer, doubled text of this verse in full and treats it as a conflation; the textual state of v. 18 is genuinely unsettled.
They were not Philistines, but Israelites of desperate fortune ( 1 Samuel 22:2 ); and it is a proof of David's great ability, and of the moral influence of his character, that he was successful, not only in controlling them and maintaining discipline, but also in forming them into as noble a set of heroes as ever existed, and who were faithful to him in all his fortunes.Flatly contradicts Ellicott, Poole and JFB, who take the Gittites for Philistine mercenaries. Both readings are given here because the brief does not decide between them.
But the term is distinctly explained here as meaning the “six hundred men which came after him from Gath,” and called “Gittites” for that reason, a body of men with whom the previous history of David has made us very familiar.
19Then the king said to Ittai the Gittite, “Why should you also go with us? Go back and stay with the new king, since you are both a foreigner and an exile from your homeland.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ham·me·leḵ way·yō·mer ’el- ’it·tay hag·git·tî lām·māh ’at·tāh gam- ṯê·lêḵ ’it·tā·nū šūḇ wə·šêḇ ‘im- ham·me·leḵ kî- ’at·tāh nā·ḵə·rî wə·ḡam- gō·leh ’at·tāh lim·qō·w·me·ḵā
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-said the-king unto Ittai the-Gittite: “Why goest thou, even-thou, with-us? Return and-dwell with the-king, for a-foreigner art-thou, and-moreover an-exile art-thou to-thy-place.”
Where the English smooths the original
David neither means to recognise Absalom as king, nor yet to speak of him ironically; he only means to tell Ittai that, as a foreigner, he need not concern himself in such a question, but is quite justified in serving the king de facto, whoever he may be.
The words contain nothing more than the simple though: Do you remain with whoever is or shall be king, since there is no necessity for you as a stranger to take sides at all.The brief's text of K&D reads “the simple though” for “thought”; the excerpt is reproduced exactly as printed.
A stranger, and also an exile; not much concerned in our affairs, and therefore not fit to be involved in our troubles.
20In fact, you arrived only yesterday; should I make you wander around with us today while I do not know where I am going? Go back and take your brothers with you. May the LORD show you loving devotion and faithfulness.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
bō·w·’e·ḵā tə·mō·wl ʾă·nō·ʿă·ḵå̄ lā·le·ḵeṯ ‘im·mā·nū wə·hay·yō·wm wa·’ă·nî hō·w·lêḵ ’ă·šer- ’ă·nî hō·w·lêḵ ‘al šūḇ wə·hā·šêḇ ’eṯ- ’a·ḥe·ḵā ‘im·māḵ ḥe·seḏ we·’ĕ·meṯ
Literal — word-for-word from the original
“Yesterday was-thy-coming, and-to-day shall-I-make-thee-wander to-go with-us, and-I going whither I go? Return, and-take-back thy-brethren with-thee: ḥesed and-ʼemeth.”
Where the English smooths the original
The reference is to the grace and truth (faithfulness) of God, which David desired that Ittai should receive upon his way.
The Hebrew as it stands must be rendered: take back thy brethren with thee in mercy and truth : but the true text is probably preserved by the Sept. and Vulg.Cambridge prefers the versions here; K&D, quoted on the same verse, explicitly denies that the divine name has dropped out of the Hebrew. The disagreement is live.
Mercy and truth be with thee; since I am now unable to recompense thy kindness and fidelity to me, my hearty prayer to God is, that he would show to thee his mercy, in blessing thee with all sorts of blessings, and his faithfulness, in making good all those promises which he hath made, not to Israelites only, but in and with them to all true-hearted proselytes, such as thou art.
21But Ittai answered the king, “As surely as the LORD lives, and as my lord the king lives, wherever my lord the king may be, whether it means life or death, there will your servant be!”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
’it·tay way·ya·‘an ’eṯ- way·yō·mar ham·me·leḵ Yah·weh ḥay- ’ă·ḏō·nî ham·me·leḵ kî wə·ḥê bim·qō·wm ’ă·šer ’ă·ḏō·nî ham·me·leḵ yih·yeh- ’im- ’im- lə·ḥay·yîm kî- šām ’im- lə·mā·weṯ šām ‘aḇ·de·ḵā yih·yeh
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-answered Ittai the-king and-said: “Living is-YHWH, and-living is-my-lord the-king, surely in-the-place where my-lord the-king shall-be, whether for-death and-whether for-life, there will-be thy-servant.”
Where the English smooths the original
Whoever goes, they stay. Whatever befalls, they stick by David; and if the worst come to the worst they can all die together, and their corpses lie in firm ranks round about their dead king.Maclaren is paraphrasing Ittai's resolve, not translating the verse; the corpses in firm ranks are his image.
But Ittai replied with a solemn oath, "Assuredly at the place where my lord the king shall be (stay), whether for death or life, there will thy servant be
Admirable and noble fidelity this in a stranger, when a son was a rebel against the father! He is a friend indeed, who loves at all times, and will cleave to us in adversity.
22“March on then,” said David to Ittai. So Ittai the Gittite marched past with all his men and all the little ones who were with him.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wa·‘ă·ḇōr way·yō·mer dā·wiḏ ’el- ’it·tay lêḵ ’it·tay hag·git·tî way·ya·‘ă·ḇōr wə·ḵāl ’ă·nā·šāw wə·ḵāl haṭ·ṭap̄ ’ă·šer ’it·tōw
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-said David unto Ittai: “Go and-cross-over.” And-crossed-over Ittai the-Gittite, and-all his-men, and-all the-ṭaph that-were with-him.
Where the English smooths the original
Their presence with him proves that he had entirely broken with the Philistines, and left his country for good.
By "the little ones" (taph) we are to understand a man's whole family, as in many other instances
And all the little ones that were with him — This shows that his whole family were come to sojourn in Judea. And being so deeply engaged for David, he durst not leave his little ones to Absalom’s mercy.
23Everyone in the countryside was weeping loudly as all the people passed by. And as the king crossed the Kidron Valley, all the people also passed toward the way of the wilderness.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·ḵāl hā·’ā·reṣ bō·w·ḵîm qō·wl gā·ḏō·wl wə·ḵāl hā·‘ām ‘ō·ḇə·rîm wə·ham·me·leḵ ‘ō·ḇêr qiḏ·rō·wn bə·na·ḥal wə·ḵāl hā·‘ām ‘ō·ḇə·rîm ‘al- pə·nê- ḏe·reḵ ’eṯ- ham·miḏ·bār
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-all the-land weeping a-great voice, and-all the-people crossing-over; and-the-king crossing-over in-the-torrent-of Kidron, and-all the-people crossing-over upon the-face-of the-way-of the-wilderness.
Where the English smooths the original
The single mention of it in the N. T. is perhaps designed to recall the present occasion and to suggest the parallel between David fleeing from Jerusalem, and Christ leaving the city which had rejected Him, as the treachery of Judas was the counterpart and “fulfilment” of that of AhithophelCambridge offers this as a figural suggestion (“perhaps designed”), not as a claim about the Hebrew text, and this synthesis tiers the corresponding thread typological for that reason.
The very same brook which Christ passed over, when he entered upon his sufferings, John 18:1 .
This general lamentation proves that David was not really unpopular in Jerusalem, though it was there that Absalom had dazzled the people by his magnificence, and sought to win favour by his gracious ways.
24Zadok was also there, and all the Levites with him were carrying the ark of the covenant of God. And they set down the ark of God, and Abiathar offered sacrifices until all the people had passed out of the city.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ṣā·ḏō·wq ḡam- wə·hin·nêh wə·ḵāl hal·wî·yim ’it·tōw nō·śə·’îm ’eṯ- ’ă·rō·wn bə·rîṯ hā·’ĕ·lō·hîm way·yaṣ·ṣi·qū ’ă·rō·wn hā·’ĕ·lō·hîm ’eṯ- ’eḇ·yā·ṯār way·ya·‘al ‘aḏ- kāl- hā·‘ām tōm la·‘ă·ḇō·wr min- hā·‘îr
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-behold, also Zadok, and-all the-Levites with-him bearing the-ark of-the-covenant of-God; and-they-set-down the-ark of-God, and-went-up Abiathar, until finished all the-people to-cross-over out-of the-city.
Where the English smooths the original
Another possible rendering is, "And Abiathar offered (sacrifices) until all the people had done passing out of the city." Passages quoted in proof that the verb may be so rendered without the addition of the word "sacrifice" are 1 Samuel 2:28 and 2 Samuel 24:22 ; but in both these places the context makes the sense plain. Such a sacrifice would, of course, sanctify both king and people in their flight; but as none of the versions support this method of translating the text, it seems unsafe to adopt it, and the passage must remain obscure.Pulpit lays out the case for the rendering BSB adopts and then declines it; the English readers' text takes the option its own commentators call unsafe.
The rendering proposed by Michaelis and Bttcher ("he offered sacrifices") is precluded by the fact that עלה never means to sacrifice when written without עולה, or unless the context points distinctly to sacrifices“Bttcher” is the brief's spelling of Böttcher, reproduced as printed.
They knew David’s great regard for them and their office, notwithstanding his failings; and the arts which Absalom had used to gain the people’s affections had made no impression upon them. They saw that he had little religion in him, and therefore they steadily adhered to David.
25Then the king said to Zadok, “Return the ark of God to the city. If I find favor in the eyes of the LORD, He will bring me back and let me see both it and His dwelling place again.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ham·me·leḵ way·yō·mer lə·ṣā·ḏō·wq hā·šêḇ ’eṯ- ’ă·rō·wn hā·’ĕ·lō·hîm hā·‘îr ’im- ’em·ṣā ḥên bə·‘ê·nê Yah·weh we·hĕ·ši·ḇa·nî wə·hir·’a·nî ’ō·ṯōw wə·’eṯ- nā·wê·hū
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-said the-king to-Zadok: “Bring-back the-ark of-God to-the-city. If I-shall-find favour in-the-eyes of-YHWH, then-He-will-bring-me-back and-show-me it and-His-dwelling.”
Where the English smooths the original
Thus David put his fate in believing confidence into the hand of the Lord, because he felt that it was the Lord who was chastising him for his sons through this rebellion.The brief's text reads “chastising him for his sons,” apparently a misprint for “sins”; quoted exactly as printed rather than corrected.
partly, that by this, means he might have the better opportunity to search out and to counterwork Absalom’s plots; which was so necessary, not only for himself, but for the defence and maintenance of the ark, and all God’s ordinances, and of the true religion.Poole is candid that one of David's reasons was intelligence work, which vv. 27-28 confirm.
for he seems to place more confidence in the symbol of the divine presence than in God HimselfJFB's charge is aimed at David's first impulse, but it sits awkwardly beside the very verses it comments on, where David refuses to keep the symbol. Included because it is a real dissenting voice, not because this synthesis agrees with it.
26But if He should say, ‘I do not delight in you,’ then here I am; let Him do to me whatever seems good to Him.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’im kōh yō·mar lō ḥā·p̄aṣ·tî bāḵ hin·nî ya·‘ă·śeh- lî ka·’ă·šer ṭō·wḇ bə·‘ê·nāw
Literal — word-for-word from the original
“And-if thus He-say: ‘Not have-I-delighted in-thee’ — behold-me: let-Him-do to-me according-to-what is-good in-His-eyes.”
Where the English smooths the original
He is, therefore, unwilling to have the ark carried with him lest he should seem to undertake to compel the Divine presence and blessing.
David's answer is full, not only of devout resignation and trust in God, but is remarkable also for the absence of superstition. He feels that God will not judge him by any mere outward sign or privilege, but in truth and equity.
(r) The faithful in all their afflictions show themselves obedient to God's will.Geneva's marginal letter (r) is retained as the brief prints it; the note is a gloss keyed to “behold, here am I.”
David's sin was ever before him, Ps 51:3; but never so plain, nor ever appearing so black as now. He never wept thus when Saul hunted him, but a wounded conscience makes troubles lie heavy, Ps 38:4.
27The king also said to Zadok the priest, “Are you not a seer? Return to the city in peace—you with your son Ahimaaz, and Abiathar with his son Jonathan.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ham·me·leḵ way·yō·mer ’el- ṣā·ḏō·wq hak·kō·hên hă·rō·w·’eh ’at·tāh šu·ḇāh hā·‘îr bə·šā·lō·wm bin·ḵā wa·’ă·ḥî·ma·‘aṣ ’eḇ·yā·ṯār ben- wî·hō·w·nā·ṯān šə·nê ḇə·nê·ḵem ’it·tə·ḵem
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-said the-king unto Zadok the-priest: “Seer, thou? Return to-the-city in-peace, and-Ahimaaz thy-son and-Jonathan the-son-of Abiathar, your-two sons with-you.”
Where the English smooths the original
The meaning is, Thou Zadok art equal to a prophet; therefore thy proper place is in Jerusalem (O. v. Gerlach).K&D's reading requires repointing the Hebrew to an article and a vocative; they say so openly, which is why it is quoted rather than assumed.
(4) The Sept. reads, See! thou shalt return , which requires but a small change in the Heb. text, and is probably the best solution of the difficulty.Cambridge lists four proposals and numbers them; this is the fourth, and its preference is for the Greek.
But "Art thou a seer?" is meaningless; and the attempts, moreover, to show that Zadok was a seer fail entirely in proof.
Others, by a slight alteration of the original text, read "Art not thou a chief" (priest), etc.
28See, I will wait at the fords of the wilderness until word comes from you to inform me.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
rə·’ū ’ā·nō·ḵî miṯ·mah·mê·ah bə·ʿaḇ·rōṯ ham·miḏ·bār ‘aḏ ḏā·ḇār bō·w mê·‘im·mā·ḵem lə·hag·gîḏ lî
Literal — word-for-word from the original
“See: I am-lingering at-the-crossing-places of-the-wilderness, until there-come a-word from-you to-tell me.”
Where the English smooths the original
The Revised Version has "at the fords of the wilderness," that is, it rightly keeps to the written Hebrew text (the K'tib)
but in both places the Hebrew text is better, the fords, both as a more definite place where messengers would find David, and also as a place of strategic importance where a retreat across the Jordan was open at any moment.
Instead however of plains which is the traditional reading (Qrî), the written text (Kthîbh) has fords . This certainly seems the more probable reading both here and in ch. 2 Samuel 17:16 , where there is the same variation, for a definite place must have been named at which the messenger was to find David, and the ford, as a critical point, would be a most natural halting place.
29So Zadok and Abiathar returned the ark of God to Jerusalem and stayed there.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ṣā·ḏō·wq wə·’eḇ·yā·ṯār ’eṯ- way·yā·šeḇ ’ă·rō·wn hā·’ĕ·lō·hîm yə·rū·šā·lim way·yê·šə·ḇū šām
Literal — word-for-word from the original
And-brought-back Zadok and-Abiathar the-ark of-God to-Jerusalem, and-they-dwelt there.
Where the English smooths the original
That is, ordered it to be carried, and took care that it was carried, by the Kohathite Levites, and they themselves attended it: and they tarried there; at Jerusalem; though their two sons that went with them entered not into the city, but stayed at a place called Enrogel
Zadok and Abiathar then returned to the city with the ark of God.K&D's entire note on this verse is one sentence; nothing has been trimmed.
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
The unit opens with a participle, not a person: הַמַּגִּיד, the one telling. What he tells is in the perfect tense, הָיָה: the heart of the man of Israel has become after Absalom. K&D fix the idiom, אַחֲרֵי הָיָה as at 2 Samuel 2:10, meaning to be attached to a person as king, so the report is not of unrest but of a completed transfer of allegiance. David's reply is all verbs of speed: a cohortative וְנִבְרָחָה (“let us bolt”) and the Piel mâhar twice, hurry lest he hurry. Why the king of a walled city runs from it is the unit's first contested question, and this brief's voices do not agree. Gill calls it a panic outright and says it is much that a man of such courage should be so intimidated at once. Henry calls it penitence: before unrighteous Absalom he could justify himself, but before the righteous God he must condemn himself. Benson and Poole give the military reasons, that Zion had no stores for a siege and that the citizens might hand him over. Ellicott judges by results, that the sequel abundantly proved the wisdom of the course and Jerusalem was saved from the edge of the sword. Cambridge, characteristically, holds both ends: David's courage had failed, and retreat proved in the end to be the wisest course. One thing all of them see in הָרָעָה, “the evil” with its article: K&D, Barnes, Poole and Cambridge alike hear in it the judgment Nathan pronounced at 2 Samuel 12:10-12.
The servants answer in a sentence with no verb in it: “according to all that my lord the king shall choose (יִבְחַר), behold, thy servants.” Maclaren, preaching this verse, calls it an abrupt, half-finished sentence and more pathetic for that, and makes it the pattern of Christian obedience, the bowing of the will and not merely of the hands. Then the procession: the king goes out בְּרַגְלָיו, at his feet, which K&D read as the idiom of Judges 4:10 and Benson and Poole press into the picture of a king walking, to humble himself under the hand of God. Cambridge, quoting Stanley, says no single day in the Jewish history is recorded in such detail, and that it shows David's patience, religion, generosity and calculation while missing only his daring courage. Ten concubines are left לִשְׁמֹר, to guard, a house they cannot guard; Gill sees the overruling providence of God preparing 2 Samuel 12:11, and adds, honestly, that it is much David had not thought of it. At the Far House (בֵּית הַמֶּרְחָק, a proper name according to Ellicott, Cambridge, Pulpit and K&D) the column halts, and the veterans cross over. Who the Gittites are is unsettled and this synthesis will not pretend otherwise: Ellicott, Poole, JFB and Maclaren read Philistines from Goliath's city; Cambridge (with the Septuagint's Gibbôrîm), Pulpit and K&D read David's own six hundred, named for the years in Gath.
David tries three times to send Ittai home, and each time uses שׁוּב, turn back. His argument is the Law's own vocabulary of the outsider: נָכְרִי, a foreigner, and גֹּלֶה, a participle, one still being exiled. K&D render the force of it, that thou hast still no fatherland, and wherever thou art allowed to settle, there only canst thou dwell. Ellicott and K&D agree that “stay with the king” is neither ironic nor an acknowledgment of Absalom: a stranger has no stake in whose crown it is. David's last gift is two words with no verb and no subject attached, חֶסֶד וֶאֱמֶת, which K&D say must mean the grace and truth of God, and which Cambridge thinks the Septuagint and Vulgate preserve more fully. The answer comes back as an oath on the covenant Name from a man born outside the covenant: living is YHWH, and living is my lord the king, and where my lord the king is, whether for death or life, there will thy servant be. K&D defend the written כִּי אִם against the Masoretic erasure and call the Keri a bad emendation; the asseveration is “assuredly.” Benson calls it admirable and noble fidelity in a stranger when a son was a rebel against the father. Maclaren, reading the same verse, says the Gittites had chosen their side, that whoever goes they stay, and that if the worst came to the worst their corpses would lie in firm ranks about their dead king. Then the keyword lands: David says לֵךְ וַעֲבֹר, go and cross over, and Ittai crosses, with his men and his טַף, which K&D and Pulpit both take to mean a man's whole household.
One verse carries the participle עֹבְרִים three times and ends the count that began at v. 18. Cambridge corrects the English at the first word: כָּל־הָאָרֶץ is all the land, the inhabitants who stood and watched, as distinguished from “all the people,” the retinue that walked. Pulpit takes the lamentation as evidence that David was not really unpopular in Jerusalem, whatever the men of Israel had decided. נַחַל קִדְרוֹן is not a valley but a winter torrent, dry most of the year; K&D give the Greek of John 18:1 in the same breath, Gill writes that the Messiah passed the same brook a little before his sufferings, and Benson calls it the very same brook which Christ passed over when he entered upon his sufferings. Cambridge is the most careful of them and therefore the most striking: the single mention of the Kidron in the New Testament is perhaps designed to recall the present occasion, with Judas as the counterpart of Ahithophel. That is a figural reading, offered as such, and this synthesis takes it as figural and not as a claim about the Hebrew.
Zadok and the Levites carry out the אֲרוֹן בְּרִית הָאֱלֹהִים, the full covenant title, used here and nowhere else in the unit. Benson says the priests knew David's regard for them and had seen how little religion was in Absalom, and so steadily adhered to David. The text then becomes genuinely obscure: וַיַּעַל אֶבְיָתָר means simply “and Abiathar went up,” and BSB's “offered sacrifices” is an old alternative that K&D reject on lexical grounds (ʻâlâh does not mean to sacrifice without ʻôlâh) and that Pulpit weighs and leaves open, concluding the passage must remain obscure. David sends the ark back. Poole gives four reasons, one of them frankly tactical, that the priests in the city would let him counterwork Absalom's plots. JFB reads David less kindly, that he seems to place more confidence in the symbol of the divine presence than in God Himself, and then immediately records that he sent it away. The verse that answers JFB is v. 26: הִנְנִי, behold me, let him do to me according to what is good in his eyes. Ellicott says David is unwilling to have the ark carried with him lest he should seem to undertake to compel the Divine presence and blessing; Pulpit calls the answer remarkable for the absence of superstition; Geneva's gloss is one line, that the faithful in all their afflictions show themselves obedient to God's will. Then intelligence work: Zadok is addressed as הָרֹאֶה, which K&D repoint as a vocative, “Thou seer,” meaning that his proper place is Jerusalem; Cambridge prefers the Septuagint's imperative, “See! thou shalt return”; Pulpit says flatly that “Art thou a seer?” is meaningless and the English's inserted “not” is an evasion. David will wait at עַבְרוֹת הַמִּדְבָּר, the crossing-places, the last form of the unit's keyword. And the priests turn back and dwell in the city, doing exactly what Ittai refused to do.
⚙ Read whole, this unit is an audit of the word servant, conducted by a king who has lost the right to command anything. Four parties are offered an exit. The court says “behold, thy servants” and follows. The foreigner is pushed toward the exit three times and will not take it. The priests are ordered through it and obey. The ten women are given no exit at all, and the narrator's silence about them is the loudest thing in the chapter. What David refuses to do, at every point where he still has power, is compel: not the Gittites, not Ittai, not the ark. Gill and Henry read his motive oppositely, panic against penitence, and the Hebrew does not decide between them; what the Hebrew does decide is that a man stripped of enforcement kept giving people their freedom. The theological centre is v. 26, where the imperative mood stops. הִנְנִי is the word of Abraham on the mountain and of Isaiah in the temple, and here it is spoken by a man who has just calculated fords, runners and spies, so that submission and prudence stand in the same breath without either cancelling the other. David sends back the ark because a box carried into battle would be an attempt to conscript God, and he has just spent five verses refusing to conscript anyone. That is the unit's argument: the throne that survives is the one that will not compel. Against it stands Absalom, who stole a heart at the gate and will take a house by force. The line below is this tool's own compression, offered to be tested and corrected; it is not Scripture and carries no authority.
The king who would not compel the ark is the king the ark came back for.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
David spends four verses trying to send אִתַּי הַגִּתִּי home, and three chapters later Ittai commands a third of the force that goes out against Absalom, standing beside Joab and Abishai. Ellicott, Cambridge and K&D all reason backwards from 2 Samuel 18:2 that he must have been an experienced general. 2 Samuel 18:5 and 18:12 hold him in the same frame as Absalom himself, since David's order to deal gently with the young man is given to the three commanders, Ittai among them. The Verifier confirms the shared names; what it cannot confirm, and this synthesis does not claim, is any verbal quotation. The link is narrative continuity.
2 Samuel 18:2 · 2 Samuel 18:5 · 2 Samuel 18:12
basis: Verifier: 2 Samuel 18:2 shares H863 ʼIttay (in 8 vv) and H1663 Gittîy (in 10 vv); 18:5 and 18:12 share H863 ʼIttay with H53 ʼĂbîyshâlôwm (in 92 vv). Both shared lexemes are rare, but both are proper names, so no quotation is claimed and the tier is deliberately held at structural.
At v. 28 David says he will linger בְּעַבְרוֹת הַמִּדְבָּר. The noun ʻăbârâh (H5679) is built on ʻâbar, the verb that has been crossing people over since v. 18, and it occurs in only two verses in the whole Hebrew Bible. The second is 2 Samuel 19:18, where the same crossing-place carries the king's household back. The flight and the restoration are pinned by one rare word. Honesty requires the text-critical note: at both verses the Masoretes' Qere reads עֲרָבוֹת, “plains,” and the Authorized Version follows it. K&D defend the written text on the strength of 2 Samuel 17:16 and 19:19, Cambridge calls the fords the more probable reading, and Pulpit calls the substitution uncalled for and mischievous. The link therefore stands on the Kethib, and says so.
2 Samuel 19:18
basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H5679 ʻăbârâh, in 2 vv only, the rarest possible shared lexeme. Recorded caveat: both occurrences are Kethib readings against a Qere of H6160 ʻărāḇâh (K&D, Cambridge, Pulpit all discuss it), so the verbal link holds on the written consonantal text.
The Cherethites and Pelethites cross the Kidron beside a rejected king in v. 18. At 1 Kings 1:38 and 1:44 the same corps, with Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet, brings Solomon down to Gihon on the king's own mule to be anointed, and the trumpet is blown. The men are the same men and the priest is the same priest; the direction is reversed, out of the city in grief and into the city in acclamation. Two of the three shared lexemes are rare, but all three name people, so this is recorded as structural, not verbal.
1 Kings 1:38 · 1 Kings 1:44
basis: Verifier: shared H3774 Kᵉrêthîy (in 9 vv), H6432 Pᵉlêthîy (in 7 vv), H6659 Tsâdôwq (in 50 vv) with both 1 Kings 1:38 and 1:44; also 1 Chronicles 18:17 for the corps. Rare lexemes, but they are names of persons and a guard, so no quotation is claimed.
John 18:1 says Jesus went out with his disciples over the χείμαρρος τοῦ Κεδρών. K&D give that Greek phrase when glossing נַחַל קִדְרוֹן here; Gill writes that the Messiah passed the same brook a little before his sufferings; Benson calls it the very same brook which Christ passed over when he entered upon his sufferings; Cambridge goes furthest, that the single mention in the New Testament is perhaps designed to recall the present occasion and to suggest the parallel between David fleeing Jerusalem and Christ leaving the city which had rejected him, with the treachery of Judas as the counterpart of Ahithophel's. This is a Greek-to-Hebrew pairing, so no shared Strong's number exists and none is offered. It is a figural reading, held by named commentators, tiered accordingly.
John 18:1 · John 13:18
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew): shared Strong's numbers are impossible here and none is claimed. Recorded basis is the identity of the named place (נַחַל קִדְרוֹן / χείμαρρος τοῦ Κεδρών, made explicitly by K&D, Gill and Benson) plus Cambridge's stated figural parallel. Widely held, not novel; still a reading, not a verbal link.
At v. 14 David fears הָרָעָה, the evil, definite; at v. 16 he leaves ten concubines to keep the house. Nathan had said that the LORD would raise up evil out of his own house and give his wives to his neighbour in the sight of the sun. K&D gloss the definite article as exactly that judgment, Barnes says David possibly remembered Nathan's prophecy, Cambridge says the calamities predicted by Nathan stared him in the face, Poole says God's hand was now against him, and Gill says the leaving of the ten was ordered by providence to bring the threat about. That is five independent commentators in this brief reading one article the same way. No lexeme computation was run for this pair, so nothing verbal is claimed.
2 Samuel 12:10-12 · 2 Samuel 16:22
basis: Not a Verifier candidate pair; no shared-lexeme computation is recorded, so no verbal claim is made. Recorded basis is the converging cross-reference of K&D, Barnes, Cambridge, Poole and Gill in this brief, all tying הָרָעָה of v. 14 and the ten concubines of v. 16 to 2 Samuel 12:10-12.
Ellicott ends his note on v. 19 by saying Ittai's answer may be compared with Ruth's, and Cambridge opens its note on v. 21 with the same comparison. Both are outsiders by birth (a Moabitess, a Gittite), both refuse a release offered by the person they are bound to, both swear by the covenant Name they were not born under, and both fix their own fate to another's in the language of death: where thou diest I will die, and whether for death or life, there will thy servant be. Two named commentators make the pairing independently; no shared vocabulary is asserted here, and the Verifier was not run on it.
Ruth 1:16-17
basis: Not a Verifier candidate pair; no shared lexeme is claimed. Recorded basis is that two commentators in this brief, Ellicott (on v. 19) and Cambridge (on v. 21), each compare Ittai's oath with Ruth's, plus the shared structure of release refused and an oath sworn on YHWH by a non-Israelite.
The Verifier pairs this unit with 2 Samuel 6:10-11 and 1 Chronicles 13:13, where the ark turns aside to the house of Obed-edom the Gittite and blesses it, which reads very attractively beside a chapter in which a Gittite follows the king and the ark is sent back into the city. It should not be built on. The gentilic H1663 names different men in the two passages, an Obed-edom is elsewhere numbered among the Levites (1 Chronicles 16:38), so the gentilic is unlikely to mean the same thing in both places, and the brief's own voices cannot agree whether the Gittites of v. 18 are Philistines at all. Recorded here so it is visible, and flagged so it is not used.
2 Samuel 6:10-11 · 1 Chronicles 13:13
basis: Verifier: shared H1663 Gittîy (in 10 vv) with 2 Samuel 6:10, 6:11 and 1 Chronicles 13:13. The lexeme match is real but the referents differ (Obed-edom versus Ittai's company), and this brief's voices dispute whether the v. 18 Gittites are Philistines at all (Ellicott, Poole, JFB, Maclaren yes; Cambridge, Pulpit, K&D no). Contested basis: do not treat as an established link.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ The movement of this unit is a rejected anointed king leaving his own city by the east, crossing a winter torrent, climbing toward Olivet, with a weeping crowd behind him and a betrayer among his counsellors. Cambridge states the reading directly: the single New Testament mention of the Kidron is perhaps designed to recall this occasion, with Judas as the counterpart of Ahithophel; Benson and Gill both identify the brook Christ crossed with this one; K&D put the Greek of John 18:1 in the lexical note. This is the ancient and widely-held reading and it is recorded as theirs, not as a discovery. One extension is the tool's own and is marked as such: the writer to the Hebrews makes suffering outside the gate the place where the people of God are told to join their king, which is the posture Ittai takes in v. 21 before there is any doctrine of it.
John 18:1 · John 13:18 · Hebrews 13:12-13
⚙ Ittai is given every legal ground to go: he is נָכְרִי, a foreigner, and גֹּלֶה, still being exiled, with no covenant claim on David's war. He answers with an oath on YHWH and a vow fixed to the king's own fate, whether for death or life. Henry draws the line himself, and it is his conclusion, not this tool's: Ittai is a friend indeed, who loves at all times and adheres in adversity, and therefore let us cleave to the Son of David with full purpose of heart, and neither life nor death shall separate us from his love, which is Henry pulling Romans 8:38-39 across the story. Benson makes the same turn and puts it as a question to the reader. Maclaren builds a whole sermon on it, that whoever goes, they stay. The shape is the gospel's: outsiders by birth attach themselves to the king at his lowest point, and are afterwards trusted with a third of the army.
Ruth 1:16-17 · John 12:26 · Romans 8:38-39
⚙ At v. 26 David stops giving orders. He will not carry the ark as a guarantee, because that would be an attempt to compel the presence he has forfeited, and Ellicott names the motive exactly that way. What is left is הִנְנִי, behold me, and a verdict handed to God: if he says I have not delighted in thee, let him do to me what is good in his eyes. Geneva's line is that the faithful in all their afflictions show themselves obedient to God's will; Pulpit notes the absence of superstition in it. This tool adds, and marks as its own, the resonance with a later night on the other side of the same torrent, where another son of David prayed that a cup pass but deferred to a will not his own. The brief's voices do not make that link, so it is offered as novel and should be weighed as such; what is not novel is the pattern itself, a king who submits to judgment and is afterwards brought back.
Luke 22:42 · Matthew 26:39
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text. This unit carries an unusual density of text-critical trouble, and the English translations quietly settle most of it. (1) v. 20, אֲנוֹעֲךָ: the written text is a Qal form where the sense requires a causative, and K&D call the Kethib a copyist's error in favour of the Qere אֲנִיעֲךָ. (2) v. 20, חֶסֶד וֶאֱמֶת stands with no verb and no divine subject; the Septuagint and Vulgate supply “the LORD show thee,” Cambridge thinks they preserve the true text, K&D denies anything has fallen out, and BSB follows the versions without a note. (3) v. 21, the Keri erases אִם from כִּי אִם; K&D call that a bad emendation and keep the Kethib. (4) v. 24, וַיַּעַל means “and he went up”; BSB's “offered sacrifices” is a real but minority rendering, rejected by K&D on lexical grounds and left open by Pulpit, who concludes the passage must remain obscure. (5) v. 27, הֲרוֹאֶה: interrogative he, article, or vocative? K&D repoint to “Thou seer”; the Septuagint reads an imperative “See!”, preferred by Cambridge; Pulpit says “Art thou a seer?” is meaningless and objects to both the Authorized and Revised Versions inserting a “not” that the Hebrew does not have; Barnes records a conjecture reading “chief priest.” (6) v. 28, Kethib עַבְרוֹת (fords) against Qere עֲרָבוֹת (plains), the same variation at 17:16. The thread built on that word depends on the Kethib and says so. (7) v. 18, the Septuagint has a longer, doubled text and reads Gibbôrîm for Gittites; Cambridge prints it and treats the Greek as a conflation.
Sources. Twelve public-domain commentators are quoted, every excerpt copied verbatim from the brief by anchor and never retyped. Several entries in the brief are block notes covering a range (Henry on 15:13-23 and 15:24-30; JFB on 15:18-20 and 15:24-25; Benson on 15:19-20 and 15:25-26), so an excerpt attributed to a verse may come from a note written over its neighbours. Two Maclaren entries and one Pulpit entry are capped in the brief; nothing quoted here depends on the capped remainder. The K&D excerpt at v. 19 contains the printed “the simple though” for “thought,” and the K&D note at v. 25 reads “chastising him for his sons,” apparently for “sins”; both are reproduced exactly as the brief has them rather than silently corrected.
Uncertain. The identity of the six hundred Gittites is genuinely undecided in this brief and is left undecided here. David's motive for the flight, panic or penitence, divides Gill from Henry and cannot be settled from the Hebrew of vv. 13-14. JFB's charge that David trusted the symbol of the divine presence more than God sits badly beside vv. 25-26, where he sends the symbol away, and is included for honesty rather than endorsed. The interlinear supplies no Strong's number for the pronominal forms at 15:14 (לָּנוּ), 15:26 (בָּךְ, לִּי) and 15:28 (לִי); notes on those indices avoid lexical claims. No Verifier check was run on the 2 Samuel 12, Ruth or John pairings, and each of those badges records that absence.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)