The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

2 Samuel15:30–37

David Weeps at the Mount of Olives

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

2 Samuel 15:30–37 — David Weeps at the Mount of Olives. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

30

But David continued up the Mount of Olives, weeping as he went up. His head was covered, and he was walking barefoot. And all the people with him covered their heads and went up, weeping as they went.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·ḏā·wiḏ ‘ō·leh ḇə·ma·‘ă·lêh haz·zê·ṯîm ū·ḇō·w·ḵeh ‘ō·leh wə·rōš lōw ḥā·p̄ui wə·hū hō·lêḵ yā·ḥêp̄ wə·ḵāl hā·‘ām ’ă·šer- ’it·tōw ḥā·p̄ū ’îš rō·šōw wə·‘ā·lū ū·ḇā·ḵōh ‘ā·lōh

Word by word22 · parsed
וְדָוִ֡דwə·ḏā·wiḏBut DavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
עֹלֶה֩‘ō·lehcontinued upH5927
√ ʻâlâh — to ascend, intransitively (be high) or actively (mount)VerbQalParticiplemasculine singular
ʻâlâh — to ascend, to go up The verb of pilgrimage and of sacrifice (the whole burnt offering is the ʻōlāh, the thing that goes up). Here the king goes up, and goes up, and goes up, but away from the city instead of toward it. The direction of Israel's holiest verb has been reversed, and reversed by the king himself.
בְמַעֲלֵ֨הḇə·ma·‘ă·lêh. . .H4608
√ maʻăleh — an elevation, iPreposition-bNounmasculine singular construct
הַזֵּיתִ֜יםhaz·zê·ṯîmthe [Mount of] OlivesH2132
√ zayith — an olive (as yielding illuminating oil), the tree, the branch or the berryArticleNounmasculine plural
וּבוֹכֶ֗הū·ḇō·w·ḵehweepingH1058
√ bâkâh — to weepConjunctive wawVerbQalParticiplemasculine singular
bâkâh — to weep Set as a participle beside the participle of ascent, so that ascending and weeping are one motion. Henry reads the tears theologically rather than sentimentally: this is not the fugitive of the Saul years but a man carrying a wounded conscience.
עֹלֶ֣ה׀‘ō·lehas he went upH5927
√ ʻâlâh — to ascend, intransitively (be high) or actively (mount)VerbQalParticiplemasculine singular
וְרֹ֥אשׁwə·rōšHis headH7218
√ rôʼsh — the head (as most easily shaken), whether literal or figurative (in many applications, of place, time, rank, itcConjunctive wawNounmasculine singular
rôʼsh — head, top, summit The word is planted here for the sake of v. 32, where the same noun means the summit of the mount. The covered head climbs toward the uncovered head of the hill, and it is at that head that the answer to the prayer is standing.
לוֹ֙lōw
Prepositionthird person masculine singular
חָפ֔וּיḥā·p̄uiwas coveredH2645
√ châphâh — to coverVerbQalQalPassParticiplemasculine singular
châphâh — to cover (Qal passive participle) Barnes and Cambridge both read the muffled head from the parallels (Jeremiah 14:3-4; Ezekiel 24:17; Esther 6:12) as the settled sign of deep mourning. Cambridge sharpens what the sign means rather than only what it is: the covering shuts the griever off from the outer world. Note that the passive participle describes David, while i16 gives the people the active perfect of the same root.
וְה֖וּאwə·hūand heH1931
√ hûwʼ — he (she or it)Conjunctive wawPronounthird person masculine singular
הֹלֵ֣ךְhō·lêḵwas walkingH1980
√ hâlak — to walk (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively)VerbQalParticiplemasculine singular
יָחֵ֑ףyā·ḥêp̄barefootH3182
√ yâchêph — unsandalledAdjectivemasculine singular
yâchêph — unsandalled A rare word, five verses in all. Poole names it a mourner's habit and adds a second and harsher reading: David is taking “a holy revenge upon himself for his former delicacy and luxury.” The bare foot is at once grief, penitence, and self-sentence. Isaiah 20 will later make the same bare foot a prophetic sign of exile, and that is where this unit's most exact verbal thread runs.
וְכָל־wə·ḵālAnd allH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeConjunctive wawNounmasculine singular construct
הָעָ֣םhā·‘āmthe peopleH5971
√ ʻam — a people (as a congregated unit)ArticleNounmasculine singular
ʻam — a people, a congregated unit Not David's troops but the people, the covenant word. The king's private penance becomes a national liturgy without a word of command being given.
אֲשֶׁר־’ă·šer-H834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
אִתּ֗וֹ’it·tōwwith himH854
√ ʼêth — properly, nearness (used only as a preposition or an adverb), nearPrepositionthird person masculine singular
חָפוּ֙ḥā·p̄ūcoveredH2645
√ châphâh — to coverVerbQalPerfectthird person common plural
אִ֣ישׁ’îš. . .H376
√ ʼîysh — a man as an individual or a male personNounmasculine singular
רֹאשׁ֔וֹrō·šōwtheir headsH7218
√ rôʼsh — the head (as most easily shaken), whether literal or figurative (in many applications, of place, time, rank, itcNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
וְעָל֥וּwə·‘ā·lūand went upH5927
√ ʻâlâh — to ascend, intransitively (be high) or actively (mount)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConjunctive perfectthird person common plural
וּבָכֹֽה׃ū·ḇā·ḵōhweepingH1058
√ bâkâh — to weepConjunctive wawVerbQalInfinitive absolute
bâkâh — to weep (infinitive absolute) The two infinitives absolute at the close (ū·ḇā·ḵōh, ‘ā·lōh) are the Hebrew way of making an action unbounded and unbroken: going-up-ly, weeping-ly. The verse ends without a finite verb to stop it, which is why the scene refuses to close.
עָלֹ֖ה‘ā·lōhas they wentH5927
√ ʻâlâh — to ascend, intransitively (be high) or actively (mount)VerbQalInfinitive absolute
31

Now someone told David: “Ahithophel is among the conspirators with Absalom.” So David pleaded, “O LORD, please turn the counsel of Ahithophel into foolishness!”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

hig·gîḏ lê·mōr wə·ḏā·wiḏ ’ă·ḥî·ṯō·p̄el baq·qō·šə·rîm ‘im- ’aḇ·šā·lō·wm dā·wiḏ way·yō·mer Yah·weh nā ’eṯ- ‘ă·ṣaṯ ’ă·ḥî·ṯō·p̄el sak·kel-

Word by word15 · parsed
הִגִּ֣ידhig·gîḏNow someone toldH5046
√ nâgad — properly, to front, iVerbHifilPerfectthird person masculine singular
nâgad — to front, to declare (Hiphil) The reporting verb of the whole unit. It opens here in the Hiphil perfect, and it will return in v. 35 as taggîḏ, the same root in the same stem, now as David's own command to Hushai. Intelligence comes up the mountain in v. 31 and is commanded back down it in v. 35; the root is the hinge. Its form here is also the one place in this unit where the received consonantal text is agreed by Ellicott, Pulpit and K&D to be damaged.
לֵאמֹ֔רlê·mōrH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Preposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
וְדָוִד֙wə·ḏā·wiḏDavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
אֲחִיתֹ֥פֶל’ă·ḥî·ṯō·p̄elAhithophel [is]H302
√ ʼĂchîythôphel — Achithophel, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
בַּקֹּשְׁרִ֖יםbaq·qō·šə·rîmamong the conspiratorsH7194
√ qâshar — to tie, physically (gird, confine, compact) or mentally (in love, league)Preposition-b, ArticleVerbQalParticiplemasculine plural
qâshar — to tie, to bind, to conspire A participle, so a present and ongoing binding, not a finished plot. Ahithophel is not merely of the conspiracy; he is one of the men doing the tying. Geneva's gloss on this verse reads the danger as specifically counsel rather than force.
עִם־‘im-withH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iPreposition
אַבְשָׁל֑וֹם’aḇ·šā·lō·wmAbsalomH53
√ ʼĂbîyshâlôwm — Abshalom, a son of DavidNounpropermasculine singular
דָּוִ֔דdā·wiḏSo DavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֹּ֣אמֶרway·yō·merpleadedH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
יְהוָֽה׃Yah·wehO LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉhôvâh — the covenant name David names God by the covenant name at the exact moment his covenant throne is being taken from him. The prayer is not that he be spared but that one man's words be made absurd.
נָ֛אpleaseH4994
√ nâʼ — 'I pray', 'now', or 'then'Interjection
The particle of entreaty : “pray,” softening an imperative aimed at God.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
עֲצַ֥ת‘ă·ṣaṯturn the counselH6098
√ ʻêtsâh — adviceNounfeminine singular construct
ʻêtsâh — counsel, advice, plan The noun that governs the rest of the unit. It is what David attacks in prayer here, what Hushai is planted to break at 15:34, and what the Verifier finds shared with 2 Samuel 17:14 and 17:7, where the outcome is recorded. Set in construct with a man's name, the counsel of Ahithophel, it is treated almost as a power in its own right: Geneva's note that crafty counsel does more harm than open force is exactly the estimate the grammar implies, since David's enemy in this verse is not an army but an opinion.
אֲחִיתֹ֖פֶל’ă·ḥî·ṯō·p̄elof AhithophelH302
√ ʼĂchîythôphel — Achithophel, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
סַכֶּל־sak·kel-into foolishnessH5528
√ çâkal — to be sillyVerbPielImperativemasculine singular
çâkal — to be silly, foolish (Piel imperative) The rarest theological move in the unit. David does not ask that Ahithophel be killed, silenced, or converted, but that his intelligence be unmade. Gill points to Job 5:12 as the standing precedent, God disappointing the devices of the crafty; K&D records simply that the prayer was answered, and names 2 Samuel 17 as the answer. The Verifier confirms that 17:14 shares both ʻêtsâh and Ahithophel with this verse.
32

When David came to the summit, where he used to worship God, Hushai the Archite was there to meet him with his robe torn and dust on his head.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

way·hî ḏā·wiḏ bā ‘aḏ- hā·rōš ’ă·šer- yiš·ta·ḥă·weh šām lê·lō·hîm ḥū·šay hā·’ar·kî wə·hin·nêh liq·rā·ṯōw kut·tā·nə·tōw qā·rū·a‘ wa·’ă·ḏā·māh ‘al- rō·šōw

Word by word18 · parsed
וַיְהִ֤יway·hîWhenH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
דָוִד֙ḏā·wiḏDavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
בָּ֣אcameH935
√ bôwʼ — to go or come (in a wide variety of applications)VerbQalParticiplemasculine singular
עַד־‘aḏ-toH5704
√ ʻad — as far (or long, or much) as, whether of space (even unto) or time (during, while, until) or degree (equally with)Preposition
הָרֹ֔אשׁhā·rōšthe summitH7218
√ rôʼsh — the head (as most easily shaken), whether literal or figurative (in many applications, of place, time, rank, itcArticleNounmasculine singular
rôʼsh — head, summit Third occurrence of this noun in three verses, and the pivot of the scene. Barnes: “The top here, and in 2 Samuel 16:1, is used almost as a proper name.” The unit's geography is organised by heads: a muffled one going up, a hill's crown, and an earth-strewn one coming down.
אֲשֶֽׁר־’ă·šer-whereH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
יִשְׁתַּחֲוֶ֥הyiš·ta·ḥă·wehhe used to worshipH7812
√ shâchâh — to depress, iVerbHitpaelImperfectthird person masculine singular
shâchâh — to prostrate oneself (Hitpael) The imperfect makes it customary, which is why the commentators are unanimous that a standing sanctuary is meant. K&D calls it probably a bamah, a high place of the kind that survived even after the Temple was built; Pulpit adds the history, that such summits were older Canaanite bamoth whose worship had since been transferred to Elohim. The narrative point is sharp: the prayer of v. 31 is answered at the one spot on the road where David habitually knelt.
שָׁ֖םšām. . .H8033
√ shâm — there (transferring to time) thenAdverb
לֵאלֹהִ֑יםlê·lō·hîmGodH430
√ ʼĕlôhîym — gods in the ordinary sensePreposition-lNounmasculine plural
ʼĕlôhîym — God Not the covenant name here, but the general divine name, matching a place of customary rather than tabernacle worship. Poole and JFB add that David worshipped looking toward Jerusalem, where ark and tabernacle were, which is the very city he is walking away from.
חוּשַׁ֣יḥū·šayHushaiH2365
√ Chûwshay — Chushai, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
הָאַרְכִּ֔יhā·’ar·kîthe ArchiteH757
√ ʼArkîy — an Arkite or native of ErekArticleNounpropermasculine singular
ʼArkîy — Archite A rare gentilic, six verses in the whole Bible. K&D and Cambridge trace it from Joshua 16:2, a family holding on the Ephraim border; Cambridge suggests a surviving trace in Ain Arîk. It is this rare word, not the common names, that makes the verbal thread to 16:16 and 1 Chronicles 27:33 firm.
וְהִנֵּ֤הwə·hin·nêhwas thereH2009
√ hinnêh — lo!Conjunctive wawInterjection
לִקְרָאתוֹ֙liq·rā·ṯōwto meet himH7122
√ qârâʼ — to encounter, whether accidentally or in a hostile mannerPreposition-lVerbQalInfinitive constructthird person masculine singular
כֻּתָּנְתּ֔וֹkut·tā·nə·tōwwith his robeH3801
√ kᵉthôneth — a shirtNounfeminine singular constructthird person masculine singular
קָר֙וּעַ֙qā·rū·a‘tornH7167
√ qâraʻ — to rend, literally or figuratively (revile, paint the eyes, as if enlarging them)VerbQalQalPassParticiplemasculine singular
qâraʻ — to rend Passive participle: the tunic is a torn thing, in the same grammatical shape as David's covered head in v. 30. The two men are described by the same construction, which is how the text says without saying it that Hushai has already joined David's mourning before a word passes between them.
וַאֲדָמָ֖הwa·’ă·ḏā·māhand dustH127
√ ʼădâmâh — soil (from its general redness)Conjunctive wawNounfeminine singular
ʼădâmâh — soil, ground (from its redness) The mourner's dust is named with the ground-word of Genesis, the stuff a man is made of and returns to. K&D reads the whole gesture, rent clothes plus earth on the head, as “the deepest mourning,” citing 1 Samuel 4:12.
עַל־‘al-onH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPreposition
רֹאשֽׁוֹ׃rō·šōwhis headH7218
√ rôʼsh — the head (as most easily shaken), whether literal or figurative (in many applications, of place, time, rank, itcNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
33

David said to him, “If you go on with me, you will be a burden to me.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

dā·wiḏ way·yō·mer lōw ’im ‘ā·ḇar·tā ’it·tî wə·hā·yi·ṯā lə·maś·śā ‘ā·lay

Word by word9 · parsed
דָּוִ֑דdā·wiḏDavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
וַיֹּ֥אמֶרway·yō·mersaidH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
ל֖וֹlōwto him
Prepositionthird person masculine singular
אִ֚ם’imIfH518
√ ʼim — used very widely as demonstrative, lo!Conjunction
The conditional particle opening the first of two paired branches, answered by wə·’im at 15:34.
עָבַ֣רְתָּ‘ā·ḇar·tāyou go onH5674
√ ʻâbar — to cross overVerbQalPerfectsecond person masculine singular
ʻâbar — to cross over, pass through The verb of Jordan crossings and of exile. Within this chapter David's whole company is passing over; to offer to pass over with him is to accept the exile, and David refuses the offer in order to make Hushai useful instead.
אִתִּ֔י’it·tîwith meH854
√ ʼêth — properly, nearness (used only as a preposition or an adverb), nearPrepositionfirst person common singular
וְהָיִ֥תָwə·hā·yi·ṯāyou will beH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConjunctive perfectsecond person masculine singular
לְמַשָּֽׂא׃lə·maś·śāa burdenH4853
√ massâʼ — a burdenPreposition-lNounmasculine singular
massâʼ — a burden, a load From nâsâʼ, to lift and carry. In prophetic usage the same noun becomes the technical word for an oracle, an utterance laid on the prophet. Here it is purely practical, and the practicality is the point: in the middle of a rout, love is measured by usefulness. Cambridge and Pulpit both read the burden as age; Benson reads it as unfitness for the camp rather than the cabinet.
עָלַ֖י‘ā·layto meH5921
√ ʻal — above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applicationsPrepositionfirst person common singular
34

But you can thwart the counsel of Ahithophel for me if you return to the city and say to Absalom: ‘I will be your servant, my king; in the past I was your father’s servant, but now I will be your servant.’

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·hê·p̄ar·tāh ’êṯ ‘ă·ṣaṯ ’ă·ḥî·ṯō·p̄el lî wə·’im- tā·šūḇ hā·‘îr wə·’ā·mar·tā lə·’aḇ·šā·lō·wm ’ă·nî ’eh·yeh ‘aḇ·də·ḵā ham·me·leḵ mê·’āz wa·’ă·nî ’ā·ḇî·ḵā ‘e·ḇeḏ wə·‘at·tāh wa·’ă·nî ‘aḇ·de·ḵā

Word by word21 · parsed
וְהֵפַרְתָּ֣הwə·hê·p̄ar·tāhBut you can thwartH6565
√ pârar — to break up (usually figuratively), iConjunctive wawVerbHifilConjunctive perfectsecond person masculine singular
pârar — to break up, annul, frustrate David asked God to make Ahithophel's counsel foolish (v. 31); he now asks a man to break it. Henry states the principle plainly, that prayers must be seconded with endeavours or we tempt God, and it is on this verse that the whole unit's ethical problem sits. The Verifier's strongest lexical thread, 2 Samuel 17:14, shares both ʻêtsâh and Ahithophel with these verses, and records there that the LORD himself had ordained the breaking.
אֵ֖ת’êṯH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
עֲצַ֥ת‘ă·ṣaṯthe counselH6098
√ ʻêtsâh — adviceNounfeminine singular construct
ʻêtsâh — counsel, advice The object of prayer in v. 31 and the object of stratagem here: the same noun, aimed at from heaven and from the ground in consecutive breaths. JFB reads exactly this juxtaposition as the key to David's character, fervent piety combined with active and far-seeing policy.
אֲחִיתֹֽפֶל׃’ă·ḥî·ṯō·p̄elof AhithophelH302
√ ʼĂchîythôphel — Achithophel, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
לִ֔יfor me
Prepositionfirst person common singular
וְאִם־wə·’im-ifH518
√ ʼim — used very widely as demonstrative, lo!Conjunction
תָּשׁ֗וּבtā·šūḇyou returnH7725
√ shûwb — to turn back (hence, away) transitively or intransitively, literally or figuratively (not necessarily with the idea of return to the starting point)VerbQalImperfectsecond person masculine singular
The turning-back verb shûwb, here in its plain sense of returning to the city.
הָעִ֣ירhā·‘îrto the cityH5892
√ ʻîyr — a city (a place guarded by waking or a watch) in the widest sense (even of a mere encampment or post)ArticleNounfeminine singular
וְאָמַרְתָּ֤wə·’ā·mar·tāand sayH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConjunctive perfectsecond person masculine singular
לְאַבְשָׁלוֹם֙lə·’aḇ·šā·lō·wmto AbsalomH53
√ ʼĂbîyshâlôwm — Abshalom, a son of DavidPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
אֲנִ֤י’ă·nîIH589
√ ʼănîy — IPronounfirst person common singular
אֶֽהְיֶ֔ה’eh·yehwill beH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iVerbQalImperfectfirst person common singular
עַבְדְּךָ֨‘aḇ·də·ḵāyour servantH5650
√ ʻebed — a servantNounmasculine singular constructsecond person masculine singular
ʻebed — a servant, a slave Three occurrences in one sentence. This is a deliberate, scripted falsehood, and the named voices do not excuse it. Ellicott: “David here counsels fraud and treachery.” Benson: it “must, of necessity, be reckoned among his sins.” Poole calls it “great dissimulation” and one of David's errors. Geneva warns explicitly against using it as a precedent. Cambridge and Pulpit both add that Scripture often records wrong actions without pausing to condemn them.
הַמֶּ֙לֶךְ֙ham·me·leḵmy kingH4428
√ melek — a kingArticleNounmasculine singular
melek — a king Hushai is told to call Absalom the king, in a scene where the actual king is standing in front of him with a covered head. The single word is the whole deceit in miniature.
מֵאָ֔זmê·’āzin the pastH227
√ ʼâz — at that time or placePreposition-mAdverb
וַֽאֲנִי֙wa·’ă·nîIH589
√ ʼănîy — IConjunctive wawPronounfirst person common singular
אָבִ֤יךָ’ā·ḇî·ḵāwas your father’sH1
√ ʼâb — father, in a literal and immediate, or figurative and remote applicationNounmasculine singular constructsecond person masculine singular
עֶ֣בֶד‘e·ḇeḏservantH5650
√ ʻebed — a servantNounmasculine singular construct
וְעַתָּ֖הwə·‘at·tāhbut nowH6258
√ ʻattâh — at this time, whether adverb, conjunction or expletiveConjunctive wawAdverb
וַאֲנִ֣יwa·’ă·nîIH589
√ ʼănîy — IConjunctive wawPronounfirst person common singular
עַבְדֶּ֑ךָ‘aḇ·de·ḵāwill be your servantH5650
√ ʻebed — a servantNounmasculine singular constructsecond person masculine singular
35

Will not Zadok and Abiathar the priests be there with you? Report to them everything you hear from the king’s palace.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wa·hă·lō·w ṣā·ḏō·wq wə·’eḇ·yā·ṯār hak·kō·hă·nîm wə·hā·yāh šām ‘im·mə·ḵā tag·gîḏ lə·ṣā·ḏō·wq ū·lə·’eḇ·yā·ṯār hak·kō·hă·nîm kāl- had·dā·ḇār ’ă·šer tiš·ma‘ ham·me·leḵ mib·bêṯ

Word by word17 · parsed
וַהֲל֤וֹאwa·hă·lō·wWill notH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absConjunctive waw, PgAdverbNegative particle
צָד֥וֹקṣā·ḏō·wqZadokH6659
√ Tsâdôwq — Tsadok, the name of eight or nine IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וְאֶבְיָתָ֖רwə·’eḇ·yā·ṯārand AbiatharH54
√ ʼEbyâthâr — Ebjathar, an IsraeliteConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
הַכֹּהֲנִ֑יםhak·kō·hă·nîmthe priestsH3548
√ kôhên — literally one officiating, a priestArticleNounmasculine plural
kôhên — a priest, one officiating Zadok and Abiathar are named twice each in this verse, once as subjects and once as recipients, with the article both times. Gill sees the practical cunning: a man may go to priests without suspicion, “pretending he had business with them as priests.” Pulpit is careful to add that the priests themselves professed no friendship for Absalom and used no guile, only their office.
וְהָיָ֗הwə·hā·yāh. . .H1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConjunctive perfectthird person masculine singular
שָׁ֔םšāmbe thereH8033
√ shâm — there (transferring to time) thenAdverb
עִמְּךָ֙‘im·mə·ḵāwith youH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iPrepositionsecond person masculine singular
תַּגִּ֕ידtag·gîḏReportH5046
√ nâgad — properly, to front, iVerbHifilImperfectsecond person masculine singular
nâgad — to declare, report (Hiphil) The unit's reporting verb returning as an imperative-force imperfect. In v. 31 the Hiphil brought Ahithophel's name up the mountain, and the received text there is so damaged that K&D must emend it; here the same stem is undamaged and points the other way. The two occurrences frame the unit.
לְצָד֥וֹקlə·ṣā·ḏō·wq[to them]H6659
√ Tsâdôwq — Tsadok, the name of eight or nine IsraelitesPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
וּלְאֶבְיָתָ֖רū·lə·’eḇ·yā·ṯār. . .H54
√ ʼEbyâthâr — Ebjathar, an IsraeliteConjunctive waw, Preposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
הַכֹּהֲנִֽים׃hak·kō·hă·nîm. . .H3548
√ kôhên — literally one officiating, a priestArticleNounmasculine plural
כָּל־kāl-everythingH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
הַדָּבָר֙had·dā·ḇār. . .H1697
√ dâbâr — a wordArticleNounmasculine singular
dâbâr — a word, a thing, a matter The intelligence network is built to carry words, because the war is a war of counsel. Everything David has done since v. 31 has been aimed at speech: pray against a counsel, plant a counsellor, open a line for words.
אֲשֶׁ֤ר’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
תִּשְׁמַע֙tiš·ma‘you hearH8085
√ shâmaʻ — to hear intelligently (often with implication of attention, obedience, etcVerbQalImperfectsecond person masculine singular
shâmaʻ — to hear intelligently, with attention Not passive hearing but attentive, obedient hearing. The same root that names Israel's obedience is here set to the work of eavesdropping, in the singular for Hushai here and in the plural for the priests at v. 36.
הַמֶּ֔לֶךְham·me·leḵfrom the king’sH4428
√ melek — a kingArticleNounmasculine singular
מִבֵּ֣יתmib·bêṯpalaceH1004
√ bayith — a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcPreposition-mNounmasculine singular construct
bayith — a house, a household, a dynasty The king's house, from which the king has just walked out.
36

Indeed, their two sons, Ahimaaz son of Zadok and Jonathan son of Abiathar, are there with them. Send them to me with everything you hear.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

hin·nêh- šə·nê ḇə·nê·hem ’ă·ḥî·ma·‘aṣ lə·ṣā·ḏō·wq wî·hō·w·nā·ṯān lə·’eḇ·yā·ṯār šām ‘im·mām ū·šə·laḥ·tem bə·yā·ḏām ’ê·lay kāl- dā·ḇār ’ă·šer tiš·mā·‘ū

Word by word16 · parsed
הִנֵּה־hin·nêh-IndeedH2009
√ hinnêh — lo!Interjection
The presentation particle hinnêh, pointing: “look, they are already there.”
שְׁנֵ֣יšə·nêtheir twoH8147
√ shᵉnayim — twoNumbermasculine dual construct
בְנֵיהֶ֔םḇə·nê·hemsonsH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural constructthird person masculine plural
bên — a son, a builder of the family name The word that has torn this chapter apart. Absalom is the bên who has taken the kingdom; here two other men's bānîm are set running to save it. The narrative answers a treacherous son with two faithful ones, and does so without comment.
אֲחִימַ֣עַץ’ă·ḥî·ma·‘aṣAhimaazH290
√ ʼĂchîymaʻats — Achimaats, the name of three IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
לְצָד֔וֹקlə·ṣā·ḏō·wq[son] of ZadokH6659
√ Tsâdôwq — Tsadok, the name of eight or nine IsraelitesPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
וִיהוֹנָתָ֖ןwî·hō·w·nā·ṯānand JonathanH3083
√ Yᵉhôwnâthân — Jehonathan, the name of four IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
לְאֶבְיָתָ֑רlə·’eḇ·yā·ṯār[son] of AbiatharH54
√ ʼEbyâthâr — Ebjathar, an IsraelitePreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
שָׁ֤םšāmare thereH8033
√ shâm — there (transferring to time) thenAdverb
עִמָּם֙‘im·māmwith themH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iPrepositionthird person masculine plural
וּשְׁלַחְתֶּ֤םū·šə·laḥ·temSendH7971
√ shâlach — to send away, for, or out (in a great variety of applications)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConjunctive perfectsecond person masculine plural
בְּיָדָם֙bə·yā·ḏāmthemH3027
√ yâd — a hand (the open one (indicating power, means, direction, etcPreposition-bNounfeminine singular constructthird person masculine plural
yâd — a hand, and so power and agency The message goes in the hand of the young men. Given how this verse's plan nearly fails at 17:17 to 21, where the runners must be hidden in a well, the phrase carries more risk than the English suggests. Poole and Gill both insist the sons were stationed outside the city, not in it, on the evidence of 17:17.
אֵלַ֔י’ê·layto meH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPrepositionfirst person common singular
כָּל־kāl-with everythingH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
דָּבָ֖רdā·ḇār. . .H1697
√ dâbâr — a wordNounmasculine singular
אֲשֶׁ֥ר’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
תִּשְׁמָֽעוּ׃tiš·mā·‘ūyou hearH8085
√ shâmaʻ — to hear intelligently (often with implication of attention, obedience, etcVerbQalImperfectsecond person masculine plural
shâmaʻ — to hear attentively (plural) The plural closes the instruction: three men, one ear. Gill's verdict on the whole arrangement is practical rather than moral, that it was a good scheme and easy to execute.
37

So David’s friend Hushai arrived in Jerusalem just as Absalom was entering the city.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

ḏā·wiḏ rê·‘eh ḥū·šay way·yā·ḇō yə·rū·šā·lim wə·’aḇ·šā·lōm yā·ḇō hā·‘îr

Word by word8 · parsed
דָוִ֖דḏā·wiḏSo David’sH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
רֵעֶ֥הrê·‘ehfriendH7463
√ rêʻeh — a (male) companionNounmasculine singular construct
rêʻeh — a companion, the king's friend Four verses in all Scripture carry this noun, which makes it one of the rarest words in the unit and the anchor of a firm verbal thread. Cambridge: it was “a regular state-officer.” K&D gathers 2 Samuel 16:16, 1 Chronicles 27:33 and this verse to establish that Hushai held the post. The title is withheld until precisely the moment Hushai walks back into the usurper's city, so that the office and the risk are named in one breath.
חוּשַׁ֛יḥū·šayHushaiH2365
√ Chûwshay — Chushai, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
וַיָּבֹ֥אway·yā·ḇōarrivedH935
√ bôwʼ — to go or come (in a wide variety of applications)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
bôwʼ — to come, to go in Used of both men. The verse is built as a door with two figures in it at once.
יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃yə·rū·šā·limin JerusalemH3389
√ Yᵉrûwshâlaim — Jerushalaim or Jerushalem, the capital city of PalestineNounproperfeminine singular
וְאַבְשָׁלֹ֔םwə·’aḇ·šā·lōmjust as AbsalomH53
√ ʼĂbîyshâlôwm — Abshalom, a son of DavidConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
יָבֹ֖אyā·ḇōwas enteringH935
√ bôwʼ — to go or come (in a wide variety of applications)VerbQalImperfectthird person masculine singular
bôwʼ — to come, to go in (imperfect) The second occurrence, in the plain imperfect, which K&D reads as contemporaneous with the first. Gill draws out the consequence that matters for chapter 16: Absalom cannot have known Hushai had been out of the city, and 2 Samuel 16:17 confirms he did not.
הָעִ֑ירhā·‘îrthe cityH5892
√ ʻîyr — a city (a place guarded by waking or a watch) in the widest sense (even of a mere encampment or post)ArticleNounfeminine singular
ʻîyr — a city, a guarded place The root sense is a watched or guarded post. The city is entered by its watcher's enemy and by its king's spy in the same instant, and neither of them is stopped.

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. The verb that goes the wrong way — 15:30

⚙ The whole of v. 30 is built on one root, עָלָה (ʻâlâh, H5927), sounded four times: David is going up, going up, they go up, going up. In Israel that verb belongs to pilgrimage and to the whole burnt offering, the thing that goes up to God. Here it climbs away from the ark, which David has just sent back. The grammar refuses to close: the verse ends with two infinitives absolute, ū·ḇā·ḵōh ‘ā·lōh, weeping-ly going-up-ly, with no finite verb to stop the motion.

✦ The named voices divide the signs between them. Barnes supplies the parallels for the covered head, Jeremiah 14:3-4 and Ezekiel 24:17, and calls it simply the sign of deep mourning. Cambridge goes further and says what each sign means: the muffled head is grief shutting itself off from the world, the bare feet are affliction, self-humiliation, penitence. Poole adds an edge the others do not, that going barefoot was “to take a holy revenge upon himself for his former delicacy and luxury,” which makes the march a self-imposed sentence and not only a lament. Henry supplies the reason: David never wept like this when Saul hunted him, because a wounded conscience makes troubles lie heavy. Pulpit and Gill both note that the gesture was shared across Persians, Egyptians and Romans, so the sign is cultural; what is not cultural is who is making it, and why.

⚙ The lexicon adds one thing the commentators pass over. יָחֵף (yâchêph, H3182) occurs in only five verses. Three of the other four are Isaiah 20:2-4, where a prophet walks unsandalled as a living sign that a nation is going into captivity. David, walking out of his capital, has put on the costume of exile before anyone has pronounced it.

ii. A prayer against a counsel, on a damaged line of text — 15:31

✦ This is the one verse in the unit where the commentators agree that the received text is broken. Ellicott: “the preposition has dropped out of the Hebrew text, leaving it unintelligible, and reading literally, and David told.” Pulpit says flatly that the text is corrupt and the Authorized Version gives the right sense. K&D works the problem hardest, canvassing Thenius's Hophal and Ewald's unusual form before concluding that דּוד should be read לדוד and the verb taken impersonally, “they announced to David.” Benson and Poole alone try to keep the text as it stands, reading it as David telling his friends what he had heard in order to stir them to join his prayer.

⚙ The prayer itself is one Piel imperative: סַכֶּל (sakkel, from çâkal, H5528, “to be silly”). David does not ask for Ahithophel's death, silence or conversion. He asks God to unmake a man's intelligence. Henry catches the restraint exactly, that David prays against the counsel and not the counsellor's person, and the Hebrew supports him: the direct object marker points at עֲצַת, the counsel. Geneva's marginal note supplies the premise, that the counsel of crafty worldlings does more harm than the open force of the enemy, and Gill supplies the precedent, Job 5:12. K&D records the outcome without embellishment: “a prayer which God answered,” and names 2 Samuel 17.

iii. The answer standing at the top of the hill — 15:32 to 15:34

⚙ The noun רֹאשׁ (rôʼsh, H7218) has been sounded twice in v. 30 for David's covered head. In v. 32 it becomes the head of the mountain, and then a third time the head of the man coming down it with earth on it. Barnes and Cambridge both observe that “the top” functions here almost as a proper name, a known place. Cambridge settles the grammar of the relative clause: the Hitpael imperfect is habitual, “Where he was wont to worship God: or, where God was wont to be worshipped.” K&D identifies the site as probably a bamah; Pulpit reconstructs its Canaanite prehistory and its transfer to Elohim; Poole and JFB add that David worshipped looking toward the Jerusalem he was leaving.

✦ That the timing is providential is not our invention but the unanimous reading of the named voices. Ellicott: Hushai's “coming appears as the beginning of the answer to David's prayer in 2 Samuel 15:31.” Cambridge: “His coming was in a manner the answer to David's prayer.” Benson: the coming “seems to have been ordered by God's peculiar providence, in answer to David's prayer.” The Hebrew stages it with וְהִנֵּה, the pointing particle: and look!

✦ And then the unit's honest scandal. Ellicott does not soften it: “David here counsels fraud and treachery.” Benson: it “must, of necessity, be reckoned among his sins, as being a plain violation of the law of truth, and only intended to deceive.” Poole calls it “great dissimulation” and “one of his errors.” Geneva forbids the precedent outright. Cambridge reports that Sir Samuel Morland cited Hushai to justify betraying Cromwell to Charles II, and then judges that “Stratagems of this kind, involving deliberate falsehood and treachery, have been employed in all ages, but the morality of them cannot be approved.” Pulpit agrees, and adds the distinction that saves Zadok and Abiathar: they used no guile, only their office. ⚙ The Hebrew makes the lie audible in a way the English does not: עֶבֶד is struck three times in one sentence, thy servant, servant of thy father, thy servant.

iv. Two men enter the same city in the same word — 15:35 to 15:37

⚙ The reporting verb frames the unit. נָגַד in the Hiphil brought Ahithophel's name to David in v. 31; in v. 35 David commands the same root in the same stem back the other way, tag·gîḏ. Between them a channel is built out of two priests and their two sons, and at v. 36 the verb of hearing turns from singular to plural, so the circle visibly widens from Hushai alone to the whole network. K&D states the commission in one line; Gill notices the cover story, that a man may visit priests without suspicion; Poole and Gill both insist, on the evidence of 17:17, that the young men waited outside the city, not in it.

⚙ Then v. 37 closes the chapter with a single verb used twice. בּוֹא (bôwʼ, H935) brings Hushai into Jerusalem and Absalom into the city, and K&D explains that the waw before the second imperfect “indicates contemporaneous occurrence.” They pass in the gate. Gill draws the consequence that makes chapter 16 work: Absalom never knew Hushai had been out. And the last thing said of Hushai before he walks into the usurper's hall is his title, רֵעֶה (rêʻeh, H7463), a word found in only four verses in Scripture. Cambridge: “a regular state-officer, the king's confidential adviser.” The office and the danger are named in the same breath.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested. The unit is organised around a single question: when God has been asked to act, what is a man then permitted to do? David prays in v. 31 and schemes in v. 34, and the text sets the two side by side without a seam. Henry's rule, that we must second our prayers with endeavours or we tempt God, is true and is the traditional resolution; but read strictly, the text does not actually grant it here. What David seconds his prayer with is a scripted lie, and Scripture's own witnesses, Ellicott, Benson, Poole, Geneva, Cambridge and Pulpit alike, refuse to bless it. So we would put the accent differently. The prayer of v. 31 is answered in v. 32, before the stratagem is devised: Hushai is already climbing the hill while David is still asking. The stratagem that follows is not the mechanism of the answer but David's attempt to manage an answer he has already been given. And the chapter's own grammar quietly agrees, because when the counsel is finally broken, 2 Samuel 17:14 assigns the breaking not to Hushai's cleverness but to the LORD's ordaining. What we would not claim, and what the commentators do not claim, is that the deceit was therefore harmless; Cambridge's Morland is evidence that this verse has been used as a warrant for real betrayal. The honest reading holds two things at once: God answered the prayer, and the man who prayed it sinned in the same hour. Under Sola Scriptura the narrative records both and excuses neither, and any reading that tidies the second away has improved on the text.

The answer was already walking down the hill before the scheme was ever invented. (⚙ synthesis, not a verse.)

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The prayer of v. 31 and the sentence that answers it verbal / quotation — confirmed

⚙ David asks that Ahithophel's עֵצָה be made foolish; 2 Samuel 17:14 records that the LORD had ordained to break the counsel of Ahithophel. The Verifier confirms the lexical overlap, and the link is not only lexical but narrative: K&D, commenting on 15:31, points forward to 2 Samuel 17 as the place where “a prayer which God answered” is recorded, and Gill writes on the same verse that “this prayer was answered, 2 Samuel 17:14.” ⚙ We note only what the Verifier records, that both verses carry ʻêtsâh and the name Ahithophel; we make no claim about the wording of 17:14 beyond that, since we have not inspected its interlinear.

2 Samuel 17:14 · 2 Samuel 17:7

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H6098 ʻêtsâh (in 85 vv) and H302 ʼĂchîythôphel (in 17 vv, rare) with 2 Samuel 17:14 and 17:7, plus H53 ʼĂbîyshâlôwm. A verbal echo within one narrative, not a quotation; the tier is earned by the rare shared lexeme H302, and no quotation is claimed.

The Archite carries out his commission verbal / quotation — confirmed

⚙ Everything David scripts at 15:34 is performed at 16:16: Hushai the Archite comes to Absalom and says, “Long live the king.” The Verifier records a rare shared lexeme, the gentilic אַרְכִּי, which occurs in only six verses in Scripture and which this unit uses at 15:32. K&D gathers 15:37, 16:16 and 1 Chronicles 27:33 together to establish Hushai's standing as rêʻeh, and Gill uses 16:17 to prove that Absalom never suspected the absence recorded in 15:37.

2 Samuel 16:16 · 2 Samuel 16:18

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H757 ʼArkîy (in 6 vv, rare), H2365 Chûwshay (in 13 vv, rare), H53 ʼĂbîyshâlôwm (in 92 vv). The rarity of H757 carries the tier; no quotation is claimed, only verbal identity of person and title, and the two verses stand within one continuous narrative, where recurrence of names is expected.

“The king's friend” is an office, not a sentiment verbal / quotation — confirmed

רֵעֶה (rêʻeh, H7463) appears in only four verses in the Hebrew Bible, two of which are the Verifier's candidates here. 1 Kings 4:5 lists Zabud among Solomon's officials with the same title; 1 Chronicles 27:33 sets Ahithophel and Hushai side by side, the one the king's counsellor and the other the king's companion, which is this unit's two antagonists catalogued in a single administrative line. Cambridge states the point directly, citing both passages, and K&D cites 1 Chronicles 27:33 for the same conclusion. Proverbs 27:10 carries another of the four and is included as lexical evidence only; the proverb makes no reference to this narrative.

1 Chronicles 27:33 · 1 Kings 4:5 · Proverbs 27:10

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H7463 rêʻeh (in 4 vv, very rare) with 1 Kings 4:5 and Proverbs 27:10; and with 1 Chronicles 27:33 the shared H302 ʼĂchîythôphel (17 vv), H2365 Chûwshay (13 vv), H757 ʼArkîy (6 vv). Verbal identity of a technical title; nothing is quoted.

Unsandalled: a mourner's sign that becomes a prophetic sentence verbal / quotation — confirmed

יָחֵף (yâchêph, H3182) occurs in five verses in all. Four of them are here and in Isaiah 20:2-4 and Jeremiah 2:25. In Isaiah the bare foot is a commanded sign that Egypt and Cush will go into captivity stripped; in Jeremiah it is a warning to a people who will not spare their own feet. The commentators reach for the same passages without knowing the count: Gill sends the reader to Isaiah 20:2 and glosses David as “like one forlorn, and going into captivity,” and Poole cites Isaiah 20:3-4 among the mourner's habits. ⚙ Our added claim is only that the rarity is real and makes the overlap significant, not that Isaiah is commenting on David.

Isaiah 20:2 · Isaiah 20:3 · Isaiah 20:4 · Jeremiah 2:25

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H3182 yâchêph (in 5 vv, rare) with Isaiah 20:2, 20:3, 20:4 and Jeremiah 2:25. A genuine verbal link across a shared motif of stripping and exile; no quotation or dependence is claimed in either direction.

The two priests and the courier line structural / thematic — confirmed

⚙ 15:35 to 36 assumes an arrangement the reader was given eight verses earlier: at 15:27 David sent Zadok and Abiathar back with the ark and with their sons Ahimaaz and Jonathan. The Verifier confirms the shared names. Gill makes the dependence explicit, citing 15:27 on this verse, and both Poole and Gill appeal to 17:17 to establish that the young men waited at En-rogel outside the city. ⚙ We flag the difference in evidence: the 15:27 leg is Verifier-confirmed lexically, while the 17:17 leg rests on the named commentators' citation, not on the Verifier's candidate list.

2 Samuel 15:27 · 2 Samuel 17:17

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H6659 Tsâdôwq (in 50 vv) and H54 ʼEbyâthâr (in 28 vv) with 2 Samuel 15:27. Downgraded from verbal because the shared lexemes are common personal names within a single continuous narrative, where recurrence proves nothing beyond same-story. The 2 Samuel 17:17 reference is supplied by Poole and Gill, not by the Verifier.

The Mount of Olives, from this ascent to the Gospels structural / thematic — confirmed

⚙ This is the Old Testament's one great scene on the Mount of Olives, and the commentators know it. Cambridge: “With the exception of this touching scene, there is little of interest connected with the Mount of Olives in the O. T.,” and it adds the remaining Hebrew references, Solomon's high places at 1 Kings 11:7-8, Josiah's desecration at 2 Kings 23:13-14, the woods of Nehemiah 8:15, and the visions of Ezekiel 11:23 and Zechariah 14:4, before concluding, quoting Stanley, that “Its lasting glory belongs not to the Old Dispensation but to the New.” Gill names Matthew 26:30 and Acts 1:12 on this verse. ⚙ The link is one of place and pattern, a king leaving the city eastward over that ridge in grief. It cannot be tiered verbal: the Gospel texts are Greek and share no Strong's lexeme with this Hebrew, and the connection is topographical and thematic, not lexical.

Ezekiel 11:23 · Zechariah 14:4 · Matthew 26:30 · Luke 19:41 · Acts 1:12

basis: Shared location and motif (the Mount of Olives as the place of a king's grief and departure eastward), named on this verse by Gill and Cambridge. The Ezekiel and Zechariah refs are Cambridge's own list. Cross-Testament links to Matthew, Luke and Acts cannot use shared Strong's numbers, since Greek and Hebrew lexicons do not overlap, so no verbal tier is possible or claimed.

The counsellor at the table, and “he that eateth bread with me” flagged — verify source

⚙ Christian tradition has long read Ahithophel, David's trusted counsellor turned conspirator, through Psalm 41:9, and Psalm 41:9 is quoted by Jesus at John 13:18 of Judas. Note carefully what this unit does and does not support. Benson, on 15:30, does use the language of a son who “should thus lift up the heel against him,” which is the idiom of Psalm 41:9, but he applies it to Absalom, not to Ahithophel. No voice in this brief makes the Ahithophel-to-Judas identification, and the Verifier lists no shared lexeme between this unit and Psalm 41. The psalm's own superscription and referent are disputed, and John 13:18 quotes it of Judas without naming Ahithophel. We therefore record the tradition and flag it rather than assert it.

Psalm 41:9 · John 13:18

basis: No Verifier-computed lexical basis: Psalm 41 is not among the thread candidates, and John 13:18 is Greek, so no shared Strong's lexeme is possible. The Ahithophel-to-Judas reading is a widely repeated traditional typology, but no named voice in this brief asserts it, and the referent of Psalm 41:9 is contested. Flagged pending a source that states it.

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

The rejected king who goes up the Mount of Olives weeping ancient/widely-held

✦ The reading is not ours. Gill states it on 15:30 in so many words, that the mount is the place “where our Lord Jesus Christ, the antitype of David, often was, in his state of humiliation, Matthew 26:30, and from whence he ascended to heaven after his resurrection, Acts 1:12.” Benson, quoting Delaney, records the older observation that Josephus places David's weeping and his view of the city at the same spot from which, the evangelist reports, our Saviour wept over it. Cambridge, quoting Stanley, concludes that the mount's lasting glory belongs to the New Dispensation.

⚙ What the Hebrew adds is the shape of the descent. David goes up away from the ark he has just refused to take with him, head covered, feet bare, betrayed by his own son and by his own counsellor, with a people weeping behind him, and he stops at the summit to worship. Centuries later a greater Son of David crosses the same Kidron to the same slope, is betrayed by his own table companion, and prays there, and it is from there that he is taken. ⚙ We add one honest caution: the pattern is a correspondence of place and posture, not a prophecy that this chapter announces.

Matthew 26:30 · Luke 19:41 · John 18:1 · Acts 1:12

Perfect wisdom where David's was mixed ancient/widely-held

Henry states the contrast on this very passage, and it is the sharpest Christological note any voice here makes: “we do not find wisdom and simplicity so united in any mere man, that we can perceive nothing which needs forgiveness. Yet, when the Son of David was treated with all possible treachery and cruelty, his wisdom, meekness, candour, and patience, were perfect.”

⚙ The unit gives Henry's contrast its exact material. David prays a faultless prayer at 15:31 and scripts a lie at 15:34, and the commentators refuse to reconcile them: Ellicott calls it fraud, Benson a sin, Poole an error, Geneva a precedent not to be used, Cambridge a morality that cannot be approved. The king who is a type is, in the same hour, a man who needs the forgiveness his antitype came to give. The typology therefore runs by contrast as well as by resemblance, which is the ordinary shape of Old Testament kingship.

Matthew 26:63-64 · John 18:19-23 · 1 Peter 2:22-23

Going out of the city, bearing the reproach novel

⚙ This third reading is our own and is offered as novel. Hebrews 13:12-13 says that Jesus suffered outside the gate and calls the church to go out to him there, bearing his reproach. 2 Samuel 15 is the Old Testament's most sustained picture of a rightful king put outside his own gate while a usurper walks in, and the chapter ends with the two movements in one verb: בּוֹא, Hushai coming in, Absalom coming in, while the king is outside. ⚙ We do not claim Hebrews has this chapter in view, and no voice in this brief connects them. The resemblance is structural, and we name it as a reading to be tested, not a link to be assumed.

Hebrews 13:12-13 · 2 Samuel 15:30

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

Text. 15:31 carries the only acknowledged textual problem in the unit. The consonantal Hebrew reads wə·ḏāwiḏ higgîḏ, “and David told,” which cannot stand with the following clause. Ellicott judges the preposition to have dropped out; Pulpit calls the text “evidently corrupt”; K&D reviews Thenius's Hophal emendation and Ewald's unusual Hophal form before proposing lə·ḏāwiḏ with an impersonal verb. BSB's “Now someone told David” silently adopts a repair. Benson and Poole alone defend the unemended reading. Our literal rendering at 15:31 follows the impersonal sense and says so in the divergences rather than smoothing it.

Interlinear ordering. The word indices in this unit follow the Berean interlinear, which in several verses lists Hebrew words in the order of the English clause rather than the order of the Masoretic line (notably 15:30 i19 to i21, 15:31 i7 to i14, and 15:34). Our literal renderings restore Hebrew order; note keys still follow the interlinear indices as given.

Sources and their limits. The Benson entry on 15:30 quotes Delaney quoting Josephus on David's tears at the summit; that is a report at two removes, and Josephus is not Scripture. Gill's parallels for the covered head (Solerius, Seneca, Egyptian and Roman usage) are antiquarian and do not bear on the Hebrew. Cambridge's Morland anecdote comes from Stanley's Lectures. Benson's text at 15:36 reads “royal cries,” almost certainly a printing error for “royal cities”; we quote it as printed. Barnes contributes only two short notes to this whole unit, one of which our source repeats under six different verses; we have cited it once, at the verse where its phrase actually occurs.

What is uncertain. (1) Hushai's age. Poole, Cambridge, Pulpit and K&D all infer it from the word massâʼ; the text never states it, and Cambridge writes “Perhaps.” (2) The identity and history of the summit sanctuary. That it was a bamah is K&D's probability, and Pulpit's Canaanite prehistory for it is inference from the general history of high places. (3) Where Psalm 3 was composed. Gill places it at the summit, Pulpit reports the Jewish Midrash placing it on the Mount of Olives and then argues for the fords of the Jordan instead; we take no side. (4) The moral status of 15:34 is uniformly condemned by the named voices; Ellicott's mitigation, that David and Hushai “had but slender knowledge of the Divine revelation,” is a nineteenth-century developmental argument and is flagged as such at that verse. (5) The Ahithophel-to-Judas typology, widespread in Christian tradition, is asserted by no voice in this brief and is supported by no Verifier basis; it is carried here only as a flagged thread.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)