The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

2 Samuel21:15–22

Four Battles against the Philistines

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

2 Samuel 21:15–22 — Four Battles against the Philistines. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

15

Once again the Philistines waged war against Israel, and David and his servants went down and fought against the Philistines. But David became exhausted.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

‘ō·wḏ wat·tə·hî- lap·pə·liš·tîm mil·ḥā·māh ’eṯ- yiś·rā·’êl dā·wiḏ wa·‘ă·ḇā·ḏāw ‘im·mōw way·yê·reḏ way·yil·lā·ḥă·mū ’eṯ- pə·liš·tîm dā·wiḏ way·yā·‘ap̄

Word by word15 · parsed
ע֧וֹד‘ō·wḏOnce againH5750
√ ʻôwd — properly, iteration or continuanceAdverb
ʻôwd — iteration, continuance "Yet again." K&D takes this ʻôwd as a joint left visible in the text: it "refers generally to earlier wars with the Philistines, and has probably been taken without alteration from the chronicles employed by our author." The word is a pointer back to a document we no longer possess.
וַתְּהִי־wat·tə·hî-. . .H1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person feminine singular
לַפְּלִשְׁתִּ֖יםlap·pə·liš·tîmthe PhilistinesH6430
√ Pᵉlishtîy — a Pelishtite or inhabitant of PeleshethPreposition-l, ArticleNounpropermasculine plural
מִלְחָמָ֛הmil·ḥā·māhwaged warH4421
√ milchâmâh — a battle (iNounfeminine singular
milchâmâh — a battle, war The governing noun of the whole unit; it recurs at vv. 18, 19, 20, marking the four engagements. Its frequency (308 verses) makes it a weak link on its own, which is why the Verifier's cross-references to 1 Chronicles 20 rest on the rarer words beside it.
אֶת־’eṯ-againstH854
√ ʼêth — properly, nearness (used only as a preposition or an adverb), nearPreposition
יִשְׂרָאֵ֑לyiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
דָּוִ֜דdā·wiḏand DavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
וַעֲבָדָ֥יוwa·‘ă·ḇā·ḏāwand his servantsH5650
√ ʻebed — a servantConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural constructthird person masculine singular
עִמּ֛וֹ‘im·mōw. . .H5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iPrepositionthird person masculine singular
וַיֵּ֨רֶדway·yê·reḏwent downH3381
√ yârad — to descend (literally, to go downwardsConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
yârad — to descend Singular. David goes down; the plural verb of fighting follows. The narrator has quietly separated the king from the army before the exhaustion is named.
וַיִּלָּחֲמ֥וּway·yil·lā·ḥă·mūand foughtH3898
√ lâcham — to feed onConjunctive wawVerbNifalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
lâcham — to fight, to feed on Nifal, third masculine plural. The Nifal of lâcham is the standard reciprocal form for joining battle, and its root sense of devouring is not accidental to a chapter whose battles will chew through four giants.
אֶת־’eṯ-againstH854
√ ʼêth — properly, nearness (used only as a preposition or an adverb), nearPreposition
פְּלִשְׁתִּ֖יםpə·liš·tîmthe PhilistinesH6430
√ Pᵉlishtîy — a Pelishtite or inhabitant of PeleshethNounpropermasculine plural
דָּוִֽד׃dā·wiḏBut DavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
וַיָּ֥עַףway·yā·‘ap̄became exhaustedH5888
√ ʻâyêph — to languishConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
ʻâyêph — to languish (Qal) A rare verb (five verses) placed last for weight. Gill reads it medically rather than morally: "his spirits began to fail, not through fear, but through feebleness." The same root describes Saul's army famished at Aijalon (1 Samuel 14:31), which the Verifier confirms as a shared lexeme. Israel's king is, for the first time in the book, physically spent on a field he chose.
16

Then Ishbi-benob, a descendant of Rapha, whose bronze spear weighed three hundred shekels and who was bearing a new sword, resolved to kill David.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·yiš·bō bə·nōḇ ’ă·šer bî·lî·ḏê hā·rā·p̄āh nə·ḥō·šeṯ qê·nōw ū·miš·qal šə·lōš mê·’ō·wṯ miš·qal wə·hū ḥā·ḡūr ḥă·ḏā·šāh way·yō·mer lə·hak·kō·wṯ ’eṯ- dā·wiḏ

Word by word18 · parsed
וְיִשְׁבּוֹwə·yiš·bōvvvH3430
√ Yishbôw bᵉ-Nôb — Jishbo-be-Nob, a Philistine
בְּנֹ֜בbə·nōḇThen Ishbi-benobH3430
√ Yishbôw bᵉ-Nôb — Jishbo-be-Nob, a PhilistineConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
Yishbôw bᵉ-Nôb — a Philistine The name is a crux. K&D reads it as one word meaning "his dwelling is on the height"; Cambridge allows that sense but adds "there are good reasons for suspecting that there is some corruption in the text." Pulpit objects that a Rephaite would hardly carry a Hebrew name. Barnes and Ellicott reconstruct it away entirely into "they halted at Gob." We record the name as the Masoretic text gives it and flag that the reading is disputed.
אֲשֶׁ֣ר׀’ă·šerH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
בִּילִידֵ֣יbî·lî·ḏêa descendantH3211
√ yâlîyd — bornPreposition-bNounmasculine plural construct
הָרָפָ֗הhā·rā·p̄āhof RaphaH7497
√ râphâʼ — a giantArticleNounpropermasculine singular
râphâʼ — a giant With the article, ha-Raphah. Barnes is careful here: "The sons of Ha-raphah, or Rephaim, are different from the 'Nephilim,' or Giants," and the sons of Anak were Nephilim, not Rephaim. Benson merges the two; Barnes and Cambridge keep them apart. The article suggests either a tribal ancestor or, as Pulpit prefers, simply the singular of Rephaim used collectively.
נְחֹ֔שֶׁתnə·ḥō·šeṯwhose bronzeH5178
√ nᵉchôsheth — copper, hence, something made of that metal, iNounfeminine singular
קֵינוֹ֙qê·nōwspearH7013
√ qayin — a lance (as striking fast)Nounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
וּמִשְׁקַ֤לū·miš·qalweighedH4948
√ mishqâl — weight (numerically estimated)Conjunctive wawNounmasculine singular construct
שְׁלֹ֤שׁšə·lōšthreeH7969
√ shâlôwsh — threeNumberfeminine singular construct
מֵאוֹת֙mê·’ō·wṯhundredH3967
√ mêʼâh — a hundredNumberfeminine plural
mêʼâh — a hundred Three hundred shekels. Every commentator in the brief makes the same arithmetic: Ellicott, Barnes, Pulpit and K&D each note it is exactly half the six hundred of Goliath's spearhead (1 Samuel 17:7). The narrator is measuring this giant against the remembered one and finding him smaller.
מִשְׁקַ֣לmiš·qal[shekels]H4948
√ mishqâl — weight (numerically estimated)Nounmasculine singular construct
וְה֖וּאwə·hūand whoH1931
√ hûwʼ — he (she or it)Conjunctive wawPronounthird person masculine singular
חָג֣וּרḥā·ḡūrwas bearingH2296
√ châgar — to gird on (as a belt, armor, etcVerbQalQalPassParticiplemasculine singular
châgar — to gird on (armor, a belt) Qal passive participle: "girded." Poole builds his whole case on this word, arguing that the missing noun is a girdle, supplied naturally from the verb, since "such ellipses of conjugate words being frequent in the Hebrew tongue." K&D, following Böttcher, reads the feminine as collective for armor. Both are guesses at a word the text does not give.
חֲדָשָׁ֑הḥă·ḏā·šāha new [sword]H2319
√ châdâsh — newAdjectivefeminine singular
וַיֹּ֖אמֶרway·yō·merresolvedH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
לְהַכּ֥וֹתlə·hak·kō·wṯto killH5221
√ nâkâh — to strike (lightly or severely, literally or figuratively)Preposition-lVerbHifilInfinitive construct
nâkâh — to strike (Hifil) The unit's signature verb: it recurs at vv. 17, 18, 19 and 21, five times in eight verses, and every time but this one it succeeds. Here it is an infinitive of intention that never becomes an event. The giant says to strike; he does not strike.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
דָּוִֽד׃dā·wiḏDavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
17

But Abishai son of Zeruiah came to his aid, struck the Philistine, and killed him. Then David’s men swore to him, “You must never again go out with us to battle, so that the lamp of Israel may not be extinguished.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

’ă·ḇî·šay ben- ṣə·rū·yāh way·ya·‘ă·zār- lōw way·yaḵ ’eṯ- hap·pə·liš·tî way·mî·ṯê·hū ’āz ḏā·wiḏ ’an·šê- niš·bə·‘ū lōw lê·mōr lō- ‘ō·wḏ ṯê·ṣê ’it·tā·nū lam·mil·ḥā·māh nêr yiś·rā·’êl wə·lō ṯə·ḵab·beh ’eṯ-

Word by word25 · parsed
אֲבִישַׁ֣י’ă·ḇî·šayBut AbishaiH52
√ ʼĂbîyshay — Abishai, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
בֶּן־ben-sonH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine singular construct
צְרוּיָ֔הṣə·rū·yāhof ZeruiahH6870
√ Tsᵉrûwyâh — Tserujah, an IsraelitessNounpropermasculine singular
וַיַּֽעֲזָר־way·ya·‘ă·zār-came to his aidH5826
√ ʻâzar — to surround, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
ʻâzar — to surround, to help The verb of rescue. Gill weighs the whole scene honestly: the aid is Abishai's, but "inasmuch as it will bear to be interpreted of David" the kill may be the king's. The ambiguity is in the Hebrew and we leave it there.
לוֹ֙lōw. . .
Prepositionthird person masculine singular
וַיַּ֥ךְway·yaḵstruckH5221
√ nâkâh — to strike (lightly or severely, literally or figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbHifilConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
הַפְּלִשְׁתִּ֖יhap·pə·liš·tîthe PhilistineH6430
√ Pᵉlishtîy — a Pelishtite or inhabitant of PeleshethArticleNounpropermasculine singular
וַיְמִיתֵ֑הוּway·mî·ṯê·hūand killed himH4191
√ mûwth — to die (literally or figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbHifilConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singularthird person masculine singular
אָ֣ז’āzThenH227
√ ʼâz — at that time or placeAdverb
דָוִ֨דḏā·wiḏDavid’sH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
אַנְשֵׁי־’an·šê-menH582
√ ʼĕnôwsh — a man in general (singly or collectively)Nounmasculine plural construct
נִשְׁבְּעוּ֩niš·bə·‘ūsworeH7650
√ shâbaʻ — to seven oneself, iVerbNifalPerfectthird person common plural
shâbaʻ — to swear, to seven oneself Nifal. The oath-verb of covenant-making, used in this same chapter (vv. 2, 7) of Saul's broken oath to the Gibeonites and of David's kept oath to Jonathan. Here it turns inward: the mighty men bind their king. It is the only place in Samuel where David is the object rather than the author of a binding oath.
ל֜וֹlōwto him
Prepositionthird person masculine singular
לֵאמֹ֗רlê·mōr. . .H559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Preposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
לֹא־lō-You must neverH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absAdverbNegative particle
ע֤וֹד‘ō·wḏagainH5750
√ ʻôwd — properly, iteration or continuanceAdverb
תֵצֵ֨אṯê·ṣêgo outH3318
√ yâtsâʼ — to go (causatively, bring) out, in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively, direct and proximVerbQalImperfectsecond person masculine singular
yâtsâʼ — to go out "Going out and coming in" is the standing idiom for a king leading the army (1 Samuel 18:16). The prohibition is therefore not a courtesy; it retires David from the one activity by which Israel first knew him.
אִתָּ֙נוּ֙’it·tā·nūwith usH854
√ ʼêth — properly, nearness (used only as a preposition or an adverb), nearPrepositionfirst person common plural
לַמִּלְחָמָ֔הlam·mil·ḥā·māhto battleH4421
√ milchâmâh — a battle (iPreposition-l, ArticleNounfeminine singular
נֵ֥רnêrso that the lampH5216
√ nîyr — a lamp (iNounmasculine singular construct
nêr — a lamp A household lamp used as the image of a dynasty's continuance. K&D grounds the title in David's own psalm: he "had become the light of Israel from the fact that Jehovah was his light (2 Samuel 22:29)." The Verifier confirms the shared lexeme H5216 with that verse and with 1 Kings 11:36, where God promises David "a lamp always before me in Jerusalem." The word is thus the seed of the whole Davidic-lamp promise, spoken here first by ordinary soldiers.
יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃פyiś·rā·’êlof IsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
וְלֹ֥אwə·lōmay notH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absConjunctive wawAdverbNegative particle
תְכַבֶּ֖הṯə·ḵab·behbe extinguishedH3518
√ kâbâh — to expire or (causatively) to extinguish (fire, light, anger)VerbPielImperfectsecond person masculine singular
kâbâh — to extinguish (Piel) Causative and second person: you shall not put it out. Geneva's marginal gloss turns the line into political theology, that the country's wealth stands in the preservation of the godly magistrate. Benson calls the phrase "A noble image this of a king!" The grammar is sharper than either gloss: the danger to Israel's lamp is located in David's own courage.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
18

Some time later at Gob, there was another battle with the Philistines. At that time Sibbecai the Hushathite killed Saph, a descendant of Rapha.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

’a·ḥă·rê- ḵên wat·tə·hî- bə·ḡō·wḇ way·hî ‘ō·wḏ ham·mil·ḥā·māh ‘im- pə·liš·tîm ’āz sib·bə·ḵay ha·ḥu·šā·ṯî ’eṯ- hik·kāh sap̄ ’ă·šer bî·li·ḏê hā·rā·p̄āh

Word by word18 · parsed
אַֽחֲרֵי־’a·ḥă·rê-Some time laterH310
√ ʼachar — properly, the hind partPreposition
ʼachar — the hind part, after A bare temporal seam, "after this." Benson: "After the battle last mentioned." Nothing more can be drawn from it.
כֵ֔ןḵên. . .H3651
√ kên — properly, set uprightAdverb
וַתְּהִי־wat·tə·hî-. . .H1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person feminine singular
בְּג֖וֹבbə·ḡō·wḇat GobH1359
√ Gôb — Gob, a place in PalestinePreposition-bNounpropermasculine singular
וַֽיְהִי֙way·hîthere wasH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
ע֧וֹד‘ō·wḏanotherH5750
√ ʻôwd — properly, iteration or continuanceAdverb
הַמִּלְחָמָ֛הham·mil·ḥā·māhbattleH4421
√ milchâmâh — a battle (iArticleNounfeminine singular
עִם־‘im-withH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iPreposition
פְּלִשְׁתִּ֑יםpə·liš·tîmthe PhilistinesH6430
√ Pᵉlishtîy — a Pelishtite or inhabitant of PeleshethNounpropermasculine plural
אָ֣ז’āzAt that timeH227
√ ʼâz — at that time or placeAdverb
סִבְּכַי֙sib·bə·ḵaySibbecaiH5444
√ Çibbᵉkay — Sibbecai, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
Çibbᵉkay — Sibbecai, an Israelite A rare name, standing in only four verses of the canon. The Verifier confirms that 1 Chronicles 11:29 and 1 Chronicles 27:11 share both this lexeme and Chushâthîy: the same man appears in David's roll of heroes and as commander of the eighth monthly division. Pulpit adds the complication that the list at 2 Samuel 23:27 calls him Mebunnai.
הַחֻ֣שָׁתִ֔יha·ḥu·šā·ṯîthe HushathiteH2843
√ Chushâthîy — a Chushathite or descendant of ChushahArticleNounpropermasculine singular
Chushâthîy — a Hushathite A gentilic occurring in five verses. Gill and Pulpit trace it to Hushah of the line of Judah (1 Chronicles 4:4), which would make the giant-killer a kinsman of the king's own tribe.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
הִכָּ֗הhik·kāhkilledH5221
√ nâkâh — to strike (lightly or severely, literally or figuratively)VerbHifilPerfectthird person masculine singular
nâkâh — to strike (Hifil perfect) The verb the unit uses for every successful kill. Note what the summary form does: it removes the duel. No blow is described, no taunt answered. The record states only that the giant was struck.
סַ֕ףsap̄SaphH5593
√ Çaph — Saph, a PhilistineNounpropermasculine singular
אֲשֶׁ֖ר’ă·šeraH834
√ ʼăsher — who, which, what, thatPronounrelative
בִּילִדֵ֥יbî·li·ḏêdescendantH3211
√ yâlîyd — bornPreposition-bNounmasculine plural construct
הָרָפָֽה׃פhā·rā·p̄āhof RaphaH7497
√ râphâʼ — a giantArticleNounpropermasculine singular
râphâʼ — a giant Second of four occurrences (vv. 16, 18, 20, 22), each carrying the article: never a giant, always the Rapha. Pulpit takes the article as evidence that the word is "simply the singular of 'Rephaim,'" a stock rather than a father; Cambridge allows either a quasi proper-name or the name of "the founder of the tribe of Rephaim." Whichever it is, the repeated definite form turns four unrelated duels into a single obituary, since Gill and Benson both trace these men to the remnant Joshua could not clear out of Gath (Joshua 11:22).
19

Once again there was a battle with the Philistines at Gob, and Elhanan son of Jair the Bethlehemite killed the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

‘ō·wḏ wat·tə·hî- ham·mil·ḥā·māh ‘im- pə·liš·tîm bə·ḡō·wḇ ’el·ḥā·nān ben- ya‘·rê ’ō·rə·ḡîm bêṯ hal·laḥ·mî ’êṯ way·yaḵ gā·lə·yāṯ hag·git·tî wə·‘êṣ ḥă·nî·ṯōw ’ō·rə·ḡîm kim·nō·wr

Word by word20 · parsed
ע֧וֹד‘ō·wḏOnce againH5750
√ ʻôwd — properly, iteration or continuanceAdverb
וַתְּהִי־wat·tə·hî-there wasH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person feminine singular
הַמִּלְחָמָ֛הham·mil·ḥā·māha battleH4421
√ milchâmâh — a battle (iArticleNounfeminine singular
עִם־‘im-withH5973
√ ʻim — adverb or preposition, with (iPreposition
פְּלִשְׁתִּ֑יםpə·liš·tîmthe PhilistinesH6430
√ Pᵉlishtîy — a Pelishtite or inhabitant of PeleshethNounpropermasculine plural
בְּג֖וֹבbə·ḡō·wḇat GobH1359
√ Gôb — Gob, a place in PalestinePreposition-bNounpropermasculine singular
אֶלְחָנָן֩’el·ḥā·nānand ElhananH445
√ ʼElchânân — Elchanan, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
ʼElchânân — Elhanan, an Israelite A rare name (four verses). The Verifier links this word to 2 Samuel 23:24 and 1 Chronicles 11:26, both of which name an Elhanan of Bethlehem among the Thirty. Pulpit judges that if the patronymic Jair is correct, "the Elhanan there spoken of is not the person who slew Lahmi." The identification is attractive and unproven.
בֶּן־ben-sonH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine singular construct
יַעְרֵ֨יya‘·rêvvvH3296
√ Yaʻărêy ʼÔrᵉgîym — Jaare-Oregim, an Israelite
אֹרְגִ֜ים’ō·rə·ḡîmof JairH3296
√ Yaʻărêy ʼÔrᵉgîym — Jaare-Oregim, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
בֵּ֣יתbêṯvvvH1022
√ Bêyth hal-Lachmîy — a Beth-lechemite, or native of BethlechemPreposition
הַלַּחְמִ֗יhal·laḥ·mîthe BethlehemiteH1022
√ Bêyth hal-Lachmîy — a Beth-lechemite, or native of BethlechemNounpropermasculine singular
Bêyth hal-Lachmîy — a Bethlehemite Another rare form, in four verses only; the Verifier ties it to 1 Samuel 16:1 and 1 Samuel 17:58, the two verses that make David a Bethlehemite on his way to and from Goliath. A second man of Bethlehem now kills a giant of Gath. Whether the word is original or a corruption of Chronicles' "Lahmi" is exactly what Barnes and K&D dispute, since the consonants are nearly identical.
אֵ֚ת’êṯH853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
וַיַּ֡ךְway·yaḵkilledH5221
√ nâkâh — to strike (lightly or severely, literally or figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbHifilConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
nâkâh — to strike (Hifil) Consecutive imperfect, resuming the narrative chain broken at v. 18. The object that follows it is the whole problem of the verse.
גָּלְיָ֣תgā·lə·yāṯ[the brother of] GoliathH1555
√ Golyath — Goljath, a PhilistineNounpropermasculine singular
Golyath — Goliath, a Philistine The name David's own story is built on. K&D concludes that the Chronicles reading (Lahmi, Goliath's brother) is original and that our text is a copyist's collapse; Cambridge answers that "There is no difficulty in supposing that another giant, beside the one slain by David, bore the name of Goliath." We record the Hebrew as it stands and the dispute as it stands.
הַגִּתִּ֔יhag·git·tîthe GittiteH1663
√ Gittîy — a Gittite or inhabitant of GathArticleNounpropermasculine singular
וְעֵ֣ץwə·‘êṣthe shaftH6086
√ ʻêts — a tree (from its firmness)Conjunctive wawNounmasculine singular construct
חֲנִית֔וֹḥă·nî·ṯōwof whose spearH2595
√ chănîyth — a lance (for thrusting, like pitching a tent)Nounfeminine singular constructthird person masculine singular
אֹרְגִֽים׃ס’ō·rə·ḡîmwas like a weaver’sH707
√ ʼârag — to plait or weaveVerbQalParticiplemasculine plural
ʼârag — to plait or weave Qal participle, masculine plural: "weavers." Cambridge explains the picture: the shaft was "short, but extraordinarily stout and heavy," and so "popularly compared to the 'beam' to which the web is fastened in a loom." It is a workman's simile, drawn from the village loom rather than the armory.
כִּמְנ֖וֹרkim·nō·wrbeamH4500
√ mânôwr — a yoke (properly, for plowing), iPreposition-kNounmasculine singular construct
20

And there was also a battle at Gath, where there was a man of great stature with six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot—twenty-four in all. He too was descended from Rapha,

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wat·tə·hî- ‘ō·wḏ mil·ḥā·māh bə·ḡaṯ ’îš må̄·ḏīn way·hî šêš wə·’eṣ·bə·‘ōṯ yā·ḏāw wā·šêš wə·’eṣ·bə·‘ōṯ raḡ·lāw ‘eś·rîm wə·’ar·ba‘ mis·pār hū wə·ḡam- yul·laḏ lə·hā·rā·p̄āh

Word by word20 · parsed
וַתְּהִי־wat·tə·hî-And there wasH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person feminine singular
ע֥וֹד‘ō·wḏalsoH5750
√ ʻôwd — properly, iteration or continuanceAdverb
מִלְחָמָ֖הmil·ḥā·māha battleH4421
√ milchâmâh — a battle (iNounfeminine singular
בְּגַ֑תbə·ḡaṯat GathH1661
√ Gath — Gath, a Philistine cityPreposition-bNounproperfeminine singular
Gath — a Philistine city Poole draws a chronological argument from this word: the battle is "in the territory of the city of Gath," which he takes to mean it preceded David's capture of Gath (2 Samuel 8:1, compare 1 Chronicles 18:1), and therefore that none of these four battles belongs to David's last days. Barnes suspects Gath was the site of all four, since the Septuagint reads Gath at v. 18 as well.
אִ֣ישׁ’îšwhere there was a manH376
√ ʼîysh — a man as an individual or a male personNounmasculine singular construct
מָדִיןmå̄·ḏīnof [great] statureH4060
√ middâh — properly, extension, iNounmasculine singular
middâh — properly, extension, measure The pivot of the verse and a genuine crux. The Kethib/Qere problem here is textual, not interpretive: K&D reconstructs an archaic plural of measure, the Septuagint apparently heard a place-name, Gill heard the unrelated root for strife. What the following clause supplies is not height at all but a count, which is why we render it "a man of measures" and leave the sense open.
וַיְהִ֣י׀way·hîwithH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iConjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
שֵׁ֣שׁšêšsixH8337
√ shêsh — six (as an overplus beyond five or the fingers of the hand)Numberfeminine singular
shêsh — six (an overplus beyond five) Strong's own gloss is exact and worth keeping: six is "an overplus beyond five or the fingers of the hand." The Hebrew number word for six is defined against the hand, and this giant's deformity is literally that overplus made flesh, twice on each limb.
וְאֶצְבְּעֹ֣תwə·’eṣ·bə·‘ōṯfingersH676
√ ʼetsbaʻ — something to sieze with, iConjunctive wawNounfeminine plural construct
יָדָיו֩yā·ḏāwon each handH3027
√ yâd — a hand (the open one (indicating power, means, direction, etcNounfeminine dual constructthird person masculine singular
וָשֵׁ֗שׁwā·šêšand sixH8337
√ shêsh — six (as an overplus beyond five or the fingers of the hand)Conjunctive wawNumberfeminine singular
וְאֶצְבְּעֹ֨תwə·’eṣ·bə·‘ōṯtoesH676
√ ʼetsbaʻ — something to sieze with, iConjunctive wawNounfeminine plural construct
רַגְלָ֜יוraḡ·lāwon each footH7272
√ regel — a foot (as used in walking)Nounfeminine dual constructthird person masculine singular
עֶשְׂרִ֤ים‘eś·rîmtwenty-fourH6242
√ ʻesrîym — twentyNumbercommon plural
וְאַרְבַּע֙wə·’ar·ba‘. . .H702
√ ʼarbaʻ — fourConjunctive wawNumberfeminine singular
מִסְפָּ֔רmis·pārin allH4557
√ miçpâr — a number, definite (arithmetical) or indefinite (large, innumerableNounmasculine singular
miçpâr — a number "Twenty and four in number." The narrator stops the battle to total a man's fingers. Cambridge and K&D both note that Pliny records the same peculiarity among Romans (Natural History xi. 43) and that it runs in families; Gill piles on Ctesias and Megasthenes. The point in the Hebrew is not wonder but enumeration.
ה֖וּאHeH1931
√ hûwʼ — he (she or it)Pronounthird person masculine singular
וְגַם־wə·ḡam-tooH1571
√ gam — properly, assemblageConjunction
יֻלַּ֥דyul·laḏwas descendedH3205
√ yâlad — to bear youngVerbQalPassPerfectthird person masculine singular
yâlad — to bear young (Qal passive) Passive. Nothing this giant did earned him his place in the story; he was born into a line. The same passive returns in the plural at v. 22 to close the unit, and it is the closest the text comes to a verdict on the Rephaim: they are a lineage, and the lineage ends.
לְהָרָפָֽה׃lə·hā·rā·p̄āhfrom RaphaH7497
√ râphâʼ — a giantPreposition-l, ArticleNounpropermasculine singular
21

and when he taunted Israel, Jonathan the son of David’s brother Shimei killed him.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

way·ḥā·rêp̄ ’eṯ- yiś·rā·’êl yə·hō·w·nā·ṯān ben- ḏā·wiḏ ’ă·ḥî šim·ʿī way·yak·kê·hū

Word by word9 · parsed
וַיְחָרֵ֖ףway·ḥā·rêp̄and when he tauntedH2778
√ châraph — to pull off, iConjunctive wawVerbPielConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
châraph — to pull off, to strip, to reproach (Piel) The word that governs the theology of the Goliath story. A Verifier pair check confirms the shared lexeme with 1 Samuel 17:10. In that chapter the reproach is answered by a speech about the living God; here it is answered in half a verse by the king's nephew and the narrative moves on. The taunt that once paralyzed an army has become a line in a service record.
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
יִשְׂרָאֵ֑לyiś·rā·’êlIsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
יְה֣וֹנָתָ֔ןyə·hō·w·nā·ṯānJonathanH3083
√ Yᵉhôwnâthân — Jehonathan, the name of four IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
Yᵉhôwnâthân — Jehonathan, an Israelite Not Saul's son. Ellicott identifies him with the brother of Jonadab, the cousin whose cunning wrecked Tamar (2 Samuel 13:3), and draws the conclusion that "David's family connections seem to have constituted a clan of heroes." Gill preserves a Jewish tradition, reported by Jerome, that this man was Nathan the prophet; we record it as tradition only.
בֶּן־ben-the sonH1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine singular construct
דָוִֽד׃ḏā·wiḏof David’sH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
אֲחִ֥י’ă·ḥîbrotherH251
√ ʼâch — a brother (used in the widest sense of literal relationship and metaphorical affinity or resemblance (like father))Nounmasculine singular construct
ʼâch — a brother, in the widest sense Construct state, binding Shimei to David. Strong's notes the word covers "literal relationship and metaphorical affinity"; here it is literal, and it puts the killing of the fourth giant inside David's own household.
שִׁמְעִיšim·ʿīShimeiH8096
√ Shimʻîy — Shimi, the name of twenty IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וַיַּכֵּ֙הוּ֙way·yak·kê·hūkilled himH5221
√ nâkâh — to strike (lightly or severely, literally or figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbHifilConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singularthird person masculine singular
nâkâh — to strike (Hifil) The last of five occurrences in eight verses. The unit's whole grammar of conflict comes down to this verb, and it belongs each time to an Israelite, never once to a Rephaite.
22

So these four descendants of Rapha in Gath fell at the hands of David and his servants.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

’eṯ- ’êl·leh ’ar·ba·‘aṯ yul·lə·ḏū lə·hā·rā·p̄āh bə·ḡaṯ way·yip·pə·lū ḇə·yaḏ- dā·wiḏ ū·ḇə·yaḏ ‘ă·ḇā·ḏāw

Word by word11 · parsed
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
ʼêth — the object marker A function word doing something strange: marking an object for a verb that never arrives. K&D's attraction is the best available explanation, and it tells us the summary was composed with v. 21 still ringing.
אֵ֛לֶּה’êl·lehSo theseH428
√ ʼêl-leh — these or thosePronouncommon plural
אַרְבַּ֥עַת’ar·ba·‘aṯfourH702
√ ʼarbaʻ — fourNumbermasculine singular construct
ʼarbaʻ — four The count that makes the unit a unit. Barnes notes the word is absent from the parallel at 1 Chronicles 20, "only the three last being mentioned in that chapter," since Chronicles omits David's near-death at vv. 15-17. The number four exists here precisely because Samuel is willing to record the battle its king almost lost.
יֻלְּד֥וּyul·lə·ḏūdescendantsH3205
√ yâlad — to bear youngVerbQalPassPerfectthird person common plural
yâlad — to bear young (Qal passive plural) The third and last passive of birth. Ellicott and Barnes both restrain the genealogy: descent from Rapha, not brotherhood. What ends in this verse is not a family but a stock, the last of the pre-Israelite giants of Canaan whom Joshua 11:22 left standing in Gath.
לְהָרָפָ֖הlə·hā·rā·p̄āhof RaphaH7497
√ râphâʼ — a giantPreposition-l, ArticleNounpropermasculine singular
בְּגַ֑תbə·ḡaṯin GathH1661
√ Gath — Gath, a Philistine cityPreposition-bNounproperfeminine singular
וַיִּפְּל֥וּway·yip·pə·lūfellH5307
√ nâphal — to fall, in a great variety of applications (intransitive or causative, literal or figurative)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine plural
nâphal — to fall The verb of collapse, used once, at the end, for all four at once. It is also the standard verb for a warrior's death in Israel's laments (2 Samuel 1:19, 25, 27), which lends the line a formal, almost elegiac close.
בְיַד־ḇə·yaḏ-at the handsH3027
√ yâd — a hand (the open one (indicating power, means, direction, etcPreposition-bNounfeminine singular construct
yâd — a hand (the open one: power, means, direction) Poole gives the two readings without choosing: either the giants "were slain by his conduct, and counsel, or concurrence," or "what is done by the inferior commanders is commonly ascribed to the general." K&D takes the phrase literally of David's own fight in v. 16. Pulpit holds both at once: "the glory of all that the Gibborim did belonged also to David their king."
דָּוִ֖דdā·wiḏof DavidH1732
√ Dâvid — David, the youngest son of JesseNounpropermasculine singular
וּבְיַ֥דū·ḇə·yaḏ. . .H3027
√ yâd — a hand (the open one (indicating power, means, direction, etcConjunctive waw, Preposition-bNounfeminine singular construct
עֲבָדָֽיו׃פ‘ă·ḇā·ḏāwand his servantsH5650
√ ʻebed — a servantNounmasculine plural constructthird person masculine singular

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. The seam in the record: a fragment, honestly kept — 15, 18, 19, 22

The unit opens on a word that points outside itself. ע֧וֹד (ʻôwḏ, "yet again") assumes wars already told in a book we do not have. K&D says the word "has probably been taken without alteration from the chronicles employed by our author." Pulpit says the same of the whole paragraph, that "It was usual in Hebrew, in making quotations, to leave them without any attempt at adapting them to their new place." Cambridge calls the source "a fragment from some 'book of golden deeds.'" Barnes, Ellicott and Cambridge all observe that 1 Chronicles 20:4-8 carries three of the four entries in a different position. ⚙ What the four voices agree on is worth stating plainly: the compiler of Samuel did not smooth his sources. He left the "yet again" pointing at nothing, left Gob unexplained, left a spear-word that appears once in the canon, and left a sentence in v. 19 that contradicts 1 Samuel 17 on its face. A forger tidies. This text does not.

ii. The king who ran out of strength — 15, 16, 17

Four verbs of action carry David down to Philistia, and then the sentence falls on וַיָּ֥עַף (ʻâyêph, H5888), a rare verb meaning to languish, to be spent. Gill refuses to moralize it: "his spirits began to fail, not through fear, but through feebleness." JFB frames the consequence, that "the king ran so imminent a risk of his life that he was no longer allowed to encounter the perils of the battlefield." Then comes the oath. נִשְׁבְּעוּ֩ is the covenant verb, and K&D is exact about its force: the men "administered an oath to him, i.e., fixed him by a promise on oath." ⚙ Notice who binds whom. In every other oath in 2 Samuel 21 the king is the one who swears or the one who must answer for an oath; here his own soldiers put him under vow. The grammar of the final clause is second person and active, תְכַבֶּ֖ה, "and thou shalt not quench." They are not simply guarding a valuable man. They are telling David that his courage has become the chief threat to Israel's light.

iii. The lamp of Israel — 17

נֵ֥ר (nêr, H5216) is the small clay household lamp. Cambridge: "The lamp in the dwelling was the proof that there was life there," and Pulpit adds the family sense from Job 18:5-6, where its extinction means a house ended. Benson calls the image "A noble image this of a king!" and Poole, Geneva and Gill all read the nation's welfare as bound to the king's life; the Targum which Gill cites goes further and reads "the kingdom of Israel" for "the lamp." K&D anchors the metaphor in David's own words in the next chapter: he "had become the light of Israel from the fact that Jehovah was his light (2 Samuel 22:29)." ⚙ The Verifier confirms that nêr is shared with 2 Samuel 22:29 and with 1 Kings 11:36. That is the striking thing: the vocabulary of the great Davidic promise, that God will keep a lamp for David in Jerusalem always, is first spoken in this book not by God, not by Nathan, and not by David, but by exhausted soldiers arguing with their king on a battlefield.

iv. Four giants and a weaver's beam — 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22

Four times the text says הָרָפָ֗ה, the Rapha, and four times a man of that stock falls. Barnes insists on the taxonomy: "The sons of Ha-raphah, or Rephaim, are different from the 'Nephilim,' or Giants," while Pulpit prefers to read "the Raphah" as "simply the singular of 'Rephaim,' and 'children of the Raphah' a more poetic way of describing the race." Ellicott notes they need not be brothers, only "descendants of Rapha." Each is undone by something ordinary: a brother's timely help, a divisional commander, a man from Bethlehem, the king's nephew. The spear of v. 19 is measured against a loom, כִּמְנ֖וֹר אֹרְגִֽים, and Cambridge explains the comparison is popular and domestic, drawn from "the 'beam' to which the web is fastened in a loom." ⚙ The last giant's distinction is that he has six fingers and six toes, a body with too much of what everyone has. He is counted, twenty-four in number, and then he is dead. The unit's arithmetic is its argument: giants can be weighed (three hundred shekels), measured (a weaver's beam) and numbered (twenty-four), and what can be counted can be killed.

v. The hand of David and the hands of his servants — 22

The summary is grammatically odd. K&D notes that the accusative אֶת־ before "these four" can be explained "from a species of attraction," the writer still carrying the verb of v. 21 in his mind. Poole gives the two possible senses of "by the hand of David": either "they were slain by his conduct, and counsel, or concurrence," or else "what is done by the inferior commanders is commonly ascribed to the general." K&D reads it more literally, that "By the hand of David" recalls David's own fight with Ishbi-benob. Pulpit holds both: "the glory of all that the Gibborim did belonged also to David their king." ⚙ The verse that closes the chapter is the exact inverse of the verse that opened it. There David went down and grew faint; here four giants fall, and the hand credited is his. Between the two stands an oath that kept him off the field. The record insists that the king wins the battles he is forbidden to fight.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested. Read straight, this passage is about what happens to a vocation when the body running it wears out. David's whole public identity was built at the point of a sling: he is the man who goes out and comes in before the people. The text lets that identity fail in one rare verb, ʻâyêph, and then lets his own soldiers take it away from him under oath. What follows is not decline but transfer. Three giants fall in the next four verses, and not one of them falls to David; yet the closing line credits the four to "the hand of David and the hand of his servants," as though the oath that retired him had not cost him anything at all. Scripture nowhere says God orchestrated the faintness, and we will not say it either. But the shape is hard to miss: the king's strength is not what keeps Israel's lamp lit, since the lamp is lit from elsewhere (2 Samuel 22:29, where David calls the LORD himself his lamp), and a promise that will outlast David by centuries (1 Kings 11:36) is first put into words by men who only wanted their king to sit down. If that reading is right, the passage is far less about giants than about the difference between being indispensable and being kept.

The king wins the battles he has been forbidden to fight. (This line is the machine's reading, not Scripture.)

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The weaver's beam: one formula, three giants verbal / quotation: confirmed

The description of the spear in v. 19, כִּמְנ֖וֹר אֹרְגִֽים ("like a beam of weavers"), is not a fresh image but a fixed phrase. The Verifier records the same rare pair, mânôwr (H4500, standing in four verses of the entire canon) with ʼârag (H707, thirteen verses), at 1 Samuel 17:7 of Goliath's spear and at 1 Chronicles 11:23 of the Egyptian killed by Benaiah. Cambridge describes the underlying picture: a shaft "short, but extraordinarily stout and heavy," compared to the loom-beam. ⚙ Three giants, one measuring-stick. The phrase functions in Hebrew narrative the way a stock epithet functions in epic, a formula a scribe reaches for when a weapon is beyond ordinary size, which is also why K&D can argue that its exact reappearance here helped generate the textual confusion over Goliath's name.

1 Samuel 17:7 · 1 Chronicles 11:23

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H4500 mânôwr (in 4 vv, rare) and H707 ʼârag (in 13 vv), plus H2595 chănîyth (in 40 vv) with 1 Samuel 17:7. The rarity of mânôwr makes this a genuine verbal formula shared across the three passages; it is repeated wording, not a citation of one text by another.

The same four feats, filed differently: 1 Chronicles 20 verbal / quotation: confirmed

Three of the four battles stand again in 1 Chronicles 20:4-8, where the Chronicler places them immediately after the capture of Rabbah rather than at the end of Samuel. Ellicott judges the Chronicles placement "a mere juxta-position rather than designed as a chronological sequence"; Cambridge, Barnes, Pulpit and K&D all note the same relocation. The parallel is where every textual difficulty in this unit surfaces: Gob against Gezer, Saph against Sippai, Jaare-Oregim against Jair, and the presence or absence of "Lahmi the brother of." ⚙ Two compilers drew on one record and filed it in two different places, and neither harmonized the other. The Verifier's shared lexemes include the rare yâlîyd, the technical word for giant-stock progeny.

1 Chronicles 20:4 · 1 Chronicles 20:5 · 1 Chronicles 20:6 · 1 Chronicles 20:8

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H3211 yâlîyd (in 13 vv, rare), H7497 râphâʼ (in 24 vv), H1661 Gath (in 31 vv), with H6430 Pᵉlishtîy (244 vv) and H4421 milchâmâh (308 vv). Sustained verbatim overlap of a whole paragraph, not a quotation of one book by the other but two recensions of one source.

“And the people were faint”: a rare verb for a spent army structural / thematic: confirmed

וַיָּ֥עַף (ʻâyêph, H5888) stands in only five verses of Scripture, and one of them is 1 Samuel 14:31, where Saul's army, having struck the Philistines all day from Michmash to Aijalon, is "very faint" and falls on the spoil. The Verifier confirms the shared lexeme alongside Pᵉlishtîy. ⚙ The two scenes rhyme and then part. Saul's exhaustion was imposed by a rash royal oath and led his men into sin; David's exhaustion leads his men to impose an oath on him, and it saves the kingdom. The same rare word marks the moment a king's demand on his own body runs out, and Samuel uses it once for each king.

1 Samuel 14:31

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H5888 ʻâyêph (in 5 vv, rare) and H6430 Pᵉlishtîy (in 244 vv). The rarity of ʻâyêph would license a verbal tier, but one shared adjective between two battle reports is thin evidence of literary dependence and neither passage quotes the other, so we deliberately under-claim and record a lexeme-confirmed thematic link. The reading of the two scenes against each other is the machine's own.

Do not quench the lamp: the vocabulary of the Davidic promise structural / thematic: confirmed

The soldiers' word נֵ֥ר (nêr, H5216) is the same word that carries the dynastic promise of a lamp kept for David in Jerusalem (1 Kings 11:36), repeated at 1 Kings 15:4 and sung at Psalm 132:17, all three of which Poole cites here. K&D connects it forward one chapter to David's own words in 2 Samuel 22:29, where the LORD is David's lamp. The Verifier, checked directly on both pairs, returns a shared-lexeme basis of H5216 for 2 Samuel 21:17 with 2 Samuel 22:29 and with 1 Kings 11:36. ⚙ The direction of the link matters: the nation's lamp is the king in v. 17, and the king's lamp is the LORD in 22:29. What the men of David ask him to preserve is, one chapter later, something David says he does not generate.

2 Samuel 22:29 · 1 Kings 11:36 · Psalm 132:17 · Job 18:6

basis: Verifier pair check: 2 Samuel 21:17 with 2 Samuel 22:29 returns shared lexeme H5216 nîyr (in 43 vv); with 1 Kings 11:36 returns H5216 nîyr plus H1732 Dâvid (in 910 vv). H5216 at 43 verses is not rare enough to carry a verbal tier, and no passage quotes another, so the link is recorded as a shared image, confirmed by lexeme, within one royal-lamp motif. Psalm 132:17 and Job 18:6 are added on the authority of Poole, Cambridge and Pulpit, not on a Verifier basis.

“He defied Israel”: the taunt that started it all structural / thematic: confirmed

The last giant does what the first one did. וַיְחָרֵ֖ף (châraph, H2778, Piel) is the verb of Goliath's defiance in the valley of Elah, where he reproaches the armies of Israel to their faces (1 Samuel 17:10). Gill makes the connection explicitly, that this man taunted "as Goliath had done some years ago," and Cambridge cross-references the same verses. A Verifier pair check on 2 Samuel 21:21 with 1 Samuel 17:10 returns the shared lexeme. ⚙ The difference is in who answers. In 1 Samuel 17 the taunt is answered by a shepherd boy from Bethlehem whom no one expected; here it is answered by that man's nephew, and the narrative does not pause for a speech. Defiance has become routine work for the house of Jesse.

1 Samuel 17:10 · 1 Samuel 17:23

basis: Verifier pair check: 2 Samuel 21:21 with 1 Samuel 17:10 returns shared lexeme H2778 châraph (in 40 vv). At 40 verses the lexeme is not rare enough for a verbal tier, and neither passage quotes the other; recorded as a confirmed shared-vocabulary link inside a repeated scene-type. 1 Samuel 17:23 appears in the Verifier candidate list on H6430 Pᵉlishtîy alone (244 vv), a weak basis, and is listed only for context.

Sibbecai, Elhanan, and the roll of the mighty men structural / thematic: confirmed

Two of the four giant-killers are named again in David's official lists. The Verifier links v. 18 to 1 Chronicles 11:29 and 1 Chronicles 27:11 by the rare pair Çibbᵉkay (four verses) and Chushâthîy (five verses); Cambridge and Pulpit identify him as "general of the eighth division of the army," and Pulpit notes the awkward fact that 2 Samuel 23:27 calls the same man Mebunnai. Elhanan (H445, four verses) links v. 19 to 2 Samuel 23:24 and 1 Chronicles 11:26. ⚙ We record these as name-identity rather than literary allusion. Sharing a rare proper name across two documents shows the same man is meant; it does not show that one text is quoting the other, and Pulpit warns that the patronymics do not agree.

1 Chronicles 11:29 · 1 Chronicles 27:11 · 2 Samuel 23:24 · 1 Chronicles 11:26

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexemes H5444 Çibbᵉkay (in 4 vv), H2843 Chushâthîy (in 5 vv), H445 ʼElchânân (in 4 vv). The lexemes are rare enough to license a verbal tier, but they are personal names shared by parallel rosters rather than repeated wording, so we deliberately under-claim and record the link as a confirmed prosopographical and structural tie.

Bethlehem produces giant-killers flagged: verify source

הַלַּחְמִ֗י (Bêyth hal-Lachmîy, H1022) stands in four verses of Scripture. The Verifier links this one to 1 Samuel 16:1, where Samuel is sent to Jesse the Bethlehemite, and to 1 Samuel 17:58, where David, standing before Saul with Goliath dead, names himself the son of Jesse the Bethlehemite. ⚙ Whichever way the textual dispute at v. 19 is settled, and it is genuinely disputed (Barnes and K&D read a corruption; Cambridge allows a second Goliath), the gentilic in our Hebrew text puts a man of Bethlehem over the body of a giant of Gath for the second time in the books of Samuel. Ellicott records the Jewish tradition, preserved in the Targum, that identified this Bethlehemite with David himself; Cambridge answers that "there is no evidence whatever in support of this idea," and we agree with Cambridge.

1 Samuel 16:1 · 1 Samuel 17:58

basis: Verifier: shared Hebrew lexeme H1022 Bêyth hal-Lachmîy (in 4 vv, rare), which would ordinarily carry a verbal tier. It is flagged instead because the very word that makes the link is the word whose originality is contested: Barnes and K&D hold that הַלַּחְמִי here is a corruption of Chronicles' לַחְמִי (Lahmi), in which case the Bethlehem reading, and therefore this link, disappears. The lexeme is real in the Masoretic text; its provenance is disputed.

Strength made perfect in weakness: a cross-Testament reading structural / thematic: confirmed

Hebrews 11:32-34 names David in a roll of those who were made strong out of weakness, grew valiant in battle, and turned back foreign armies. ⚙ Hebrews does not cite 2 Samuel 21, and because the link crosses from Greek to Hebrew no shared Strong's number is even possible, so nothing verbal can be claimed. What can be said is that this unit is the one place in the books of Samuel where David's own weakness in battle is narrated as such, and that the pattern Hebrews describes, weakness turned to victory through others, is exactly the movement from v. 15 to v. 22. Paul states the principle rather than the history at 2 Corinthians 12:9-10. Henry, commenting on this passage, reaches for the same register: "In spiritual conflicts, even strong saints sometimes wax faint."

Hebrews 11:32-34 · 2 Corinthians 12:9-10

basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew): shared Strong's numbers are impossible by definition, so no verbal tier can be claimed. Recorded as a structural link on a shared pattern, weakness in the champion answered by deliverance through others, with no quotation asserted in either direction.

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

The giants and the last enemy ancient/widely-held

Matthew Henry reads the four Rephaim of this chapter as the church's remaining adversaries and ends at the grave: "Death is a Christian's last enemy, and a son of Anak; but through Him that triumphed for us, believers shall be more than conquerors at last, even over that enemy." ⚙ The unit itself supports the shape of that reading even where it does not supply the doctrine. Four enemies of enormous size are named, weighed and numbered, and every one of them falls; the text's whole method is to make the unkillable countable. The New Testament applies precisely that logic to death itself, the last enemy to be destroyed (1 Corinthians 15:26), swallowed up in victory. Henry's application is homiletical rather than exegetical, and we mark it so, but the typology of the giant as the enemy beyond human measure, overthrown by a champion's victory imputed to others, is old and widely held in Christian reading of the Davidic wars.

1 Corinthians 15:26 · 1 Corinthians 15:54-57 · Hebrews 2:14-15

The lamp that shall not be quenched ancient/widely-held

The oath of v. 17 asks David not to extinguish נֵ֥ר יִשְׂרָאֵֽל, the lamp of Israel. The same word carries the dynastic promise, that David his servant will always have a lamp before the LORD in Jerusalem (1 Kings 11:36), and the psalm's declaration that God has prepared a lamp for his anointed (Psalm 132:17). Geneva reads the verse as the welfare of a people bound up in "the preservation of the godly magistrate"; K&D roots the light in God himself, since David "had become the light of Israel from the fact that Jehovah was his light." ⚙ The New Testament takes the lamp promise as fulfilled in one descendant, not extended forever through many: Zacharias blesses God for raising a horn of salvation in the house of David and for the dayspring from on high (Luke 1:69, 1:78), and the risen Christ names himself the root and offspring of David and the morning star (Revelation 22:16). The reading of the Davidic lamp as a messianic promise is ancient and widely held; the particular hinge we press, that the promise's vocabulary is first spoken by frightened soldiers rather than by a prophet, is our own observation and carries no authority.

1 Kings 11:36 · Psalm 132:17 · Luke 1:69 · Revelation 22:16

A second Bethlehemite over a giant of Gath novel

⚙ This reading is the machine's own and should be weighed carefully, because it rests on a disputed word. In the Hebrew as transmitted, the man who kills a Goliath at Gob is בֵּ֣ית הַלַּחְמִ֗י, a Bethlehemite, the same rare gentilic that marks Jesse's house at 1 Samuel 16:1 and David's answer to Saul at 1 Samuel 17:58. Barnes and K&D hold that the word is a scribal corruption of "Lahmi" and should be removed; Cambridge allows it to stand. If it stands, Bethlehem appears twice in Samuel as the village that sends out giant-killers, and Micah 5:2 will later name that same village, little among the clans of Judah, as the birthplace of the ruler whose goings forth are from of old. Matthew 2:5-6 makes the application. We do not claim the narrator intended the pattern, and we do not build doctrine on a contested consonant; we note that the town from which the deliverer comes is, in this book, conspicuously small and conspicuously repeated.

1 Samuel 17:58 · Micah 5:2 · Matthew 2:5-6

The king who was kept from the field, and the King who went alone novel

⚙ A contrast rather than a type, offered as such. David is forbidden by oath to go out to battle again; his servants fight in his place and the victories are credited to his hand (v. 22). Poole gives the ordinary sense: "what is done by the inferior commanders is commonly ascribed to the general." The gospels reverse the arrangement at the decisive point. At his arrest the servants are told to stand down and the arresting party is told to let them go (John 18:8), and the King goes out alone into the battle they cannot fight, so that the victory is credited to them. David's lamp had to be protected from his own courage; the greater Son of David lays down his life of himself (John 10:18) and takes it again. The comparison is ours, not the text's, and no commentator in the brief draws it; the correspondence of a champion's single combat standing for a whole people, however, is the logic 1 Samuel 17 itself established.

John 18:8 · John 10:17-18 · Romans 5:18-19

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

Text. This is one of the most textually damaged paragraphs in the books of Samuel, and we have not concealed it. Four separate problems stand in eight verses: (1) the name Ishbi-benob in v. 16, which Cambridge, Pulpit and K&D treat as uncertain and which Barnes and Ellicott reconstruct out of the text entirely into "they halted at Gob"; (2) the noun missing after châdâsh ("new") in v. 16, where the Vulgate supplies "sword," K&D and others "armour," and the Septuagint appears to have read a weapon-name instead of "new"; (3) the place-name Gob in vv. 18 and 19, which 1 Chronicles 20:4 calls Gezer and the Septuagint calls Gath; (4) the clause in v. 19, where the Hebrew says Elhanan killed Goliath and 1 Chronicles 20:5 says he killed Lahmi the brother of Goliath. Our literal renderings follow the Masoretic text as printed in the interlinear; the English of BSB follows Chronicles at v. 19 with a bracketed supplement.

What is uncertain. The date of these battles is unknown. JFB and Benson place them late in David's reign, and Benson infers age from David's faintness; Barnes places them "quite in the early part of David's reign, while he was still young and active"; Poole argues from the mention of Gath in v. 20 that they must precede 2 Samuel 8:1. Ellicott says only that it must be after David became king of all Israel, reasoning from the title "light of Israel." We have not chosen between them. The subject of the verb "and smote" in v. 17 is genuinely ambiguous in Hebrew, as Ellicott and Cambridge both say; BSB assigns it to Abishai and we have flagged that as an English decision.

Sources. All Hebrew surfaces, transliterations, parsings and Strong's numbers are from the Berean interlinear supplied in the brief; the BSB verse text is CC0. Every ✦ excerpt is a verbatim contiguous quotation from the named public-domain commentator, selected by anchor and copied by machine, not retyped. Gill's citations of Josephus, Pliny, Ctesias, the Targum and the Talmud are reported as Gill reports them and have not been independently checked. Thread bases marked "Verifier" are computed shared-lexeme results; three links (2 Samuel 22:29, 1 Kings 11:36, 1 Samuel 17:10) were obtained by running the Verifier directly on the pair, and their returned bases are quoted in the badges.

What is machine synthesis. Everything marked ⚙, including all four Christ readings, the sola reading and its pullquote, and every interpretive sentence in the movements not attributed to a named commentator. Two of the Christ entries are marked novel because no source in this brief draws them. The sola pullquote is a line of commentary, not Scripture.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)