AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
"You shall not steal" → the case-law of theft structural / thematic — confirmed
The whole chapter is the eighth commandment unfolded into livable statute: what Exodus 20:15 forbids in two words — lōʼ tiḡnōḇ, "you shall not steal" — Exodus 22 measures, grades, and repays. The shared verb is the chapter's keyword gânab. The same vein runs to Proverbs 6:30 (the thief who steals to satisfy hunger), to Deuteronomy 24:7 (the capital case of man-stealing), and to Obadiah's image of thieves who take only "till they had enough." This is the Decalogue becoming law.
Exodus 22:1 · Exodus 20:15 · Deuteronomy 24:7 · Proverbs 6:30 · Obadiah 1:5
basis: Verifier: shared lexeme H1589 gânab (in 36 vv) links Exodus 22:1 to Exodus 20:15, Proverbs 6:30, Obadiah 1:5; H1589 gânab + H4376 mâkar (74 vv) + H1590 gannâb (17 vv) link Deuteronomy 24:7. A shared common verb of theme, not a quotation — tiered structural/thematic, not verbal.
The fourfold sheep → David and Nathan structural / thematic — confirmed
The Cambridge Bible names it directly at v. 1: the fourfold restitution of a sheep is "the penalty named by David in his reply to Nathan's parable" (2 Samuel 12:6) — "he shall restore the lamb fourfold." Unknowing, David pronounces upon himself the exact sentence of this statute, and Nathan answers, "You are the man." The law David quotes to condemn another becomes the measure of his own sin. The verbal tie is the make-whole verb shâlam; the thematic tie — a king tried by the very law he cites — is unmistakable.
Exodus 22:1 · 2 Samuel 12:5 · 2 Samuel 12:6
basis: Verifier on Exodus 22:1 ↔ 2 Samuel 12:6 returns only shared lexeme H7999 shâlam (in 107 vv) — a common restitution verb, not rare. The fourfold-sheep correspondence is the named, recorded basis (Cambridge Bible); tiered structural/thematic because the shared lexeme is common and there is no quotation claim.
The torn carcass → Jacob's protest to Laban verbal / quotation — confirmed
Of all this unit's threads, the tightest is verbal. The exemption of v. 13 — the shepherd need not repay the beast "torn in pieces" (ṭᵉrêphâh) if he brings it as witness — uses a rare word that Jacob throws at Laban: "That which was torn by beasts I did not bring to you; I bore the loss of it myself" (Genesis 31:39). The law grants the faithful shepherd the very right Jacob renounced for love. Keil makes the connection explicit at vv. 12–13. The same rare lexeme also ties v. 12's stolen-beast clause to Jacob's "of my hand you required it, whether stolen by day or stolen by night."
Exodus 22:13 · Exodus 22:12 · Genesis 31:39
basis: Verifier on Exodus 22:13 ↔ Genesis 31:39 returns the RARE shared lexeme H2966 ṭᵉrêphâh (in only 9 vv) — a genuine verbal link. (Exodus 22:12 ↔ Genesis 31:39 shares H1589 gânab, structural.) The rare ṭᵉrêphâh warrants the verbal tier; Keil & Delitzsch records the same connection.
The lost thing claimed → the law of restoring what is lost verbal / quotation — confirmed
Verse 9's clause about "any lost item" (ʼăbêdâh) that someone claims, "This is mine," connects by a rare shared word to the lost-property laws of Leviticus 6:3–4 (the guilt-offering for a found-and-denied lost thing) and Deuteronomy 22:3 (you must restore your brother's lost ox, donkey, garment — "you may not hide yourself"). The same noun ʼăbêdâh binds them; together they form the Torah's coherent ethic of the lost and found: what is not yours, even by accident in your hand, must be made right.
Exodus 22:9 · Leviticus 6:3 · Leviticus 6:4 · Deuteronomy 22:3
basis: Verifier on Exodus 22:9 ↔ Leviticus 6:3 returns the RARE shared lexeme H9 ʼăbêdâh (in only 4 vv); Deuteronomy 22:3 shares H9 ʼăbêdâh + H2543 chămôwr (93 vv). The rarity of ʼăbêdâh (4 vv) supports the verbal tier as a shared technical term of the lost-property statutes.
Restitution from the best → the spoil at Amalek verbal / quotation — confirmed
The rare word mêṭaḇ, "the best part" (v. 5), surfaces in only five verses. Two of them are Pharaoh settling Jacob's family in "the best of the land" (Genesis 47:6, 11); two are the tragedy of Amalek, where Saul and the people "spared the best of the sheep and of the oxen" in disobedience (1 Samuel 15:9, 15). The trespasser must surrender his mêṭaḇ in restitution; Saul withheld his in rebellion. The same word that names righteous repayment names ruinous greed — the difference is whether the best is given up or grasped.
Exodus 22:5 · Genesis 47:6 · 1 Samuel 15:9 · 1 Samuel 15:15
basis: Verifier on Exodus 22:5 ↔ 1 Samuel 15:9 returns shared lexeme H4315 mêyṭâb (in only 5 vv); Genesis 47:6 shares the same rare H4315 mêyṭâb. The lexeme appears in just 5 verses canon-wide, so the shared technical term supports the verbal tier; the moral contrast is interpretive.
Beast, blaze, and stack → the harvest-fire texts structural / thematic — confirmed
The trespass pair (vv. 5–6) shares vocabulary with the narrative of destroyed harvests. Samson's foxes "burned (bâʻar) up the shocks and the standing grain and the vineyards (kerem)" of the Philistines (Judges 15:5) — the same three words BSB renders "grazes / fire / vineyard / standing grain" here. And the rare word for a "stack" of sheaves, gâdîš (v. 6, only 4 verses), reappears in Job's serene image of death "like a shock of grain gathered in its season" (Job 5:26). The law's somber catalogue of burnt stacks and trampled vineyards is the same agrarian world Israel's stories are told in.
Exodus 22:5 · Exodus 22:6 · Judges 15:5 · Job 5:26
basis: Verifier: Exodus 22:5 ↔ Judges 15:5 shares H3754 kerem (81 vv) + H1197 bâʻar (90 vv) + H7971 shâlach (790 vv); Exodus 22:6 ↔ Job 5:26 and Job 21:32 each share the rare H1430 gâdîysh (in only 4 vv). The Judges link rests on common agrarian lexemes (structural); the gâdîš tie to Job is a rarer shared term but the connection is imagistic, so the thread is tiered structural/thematic overall.
"Breaking in" → the blood at Judah's skirts verbal / quotation — confirmed
The single rarest verbal tie in the unit guards v. 2. The word for the burglar's "breaking in" — maḥteret, the digging-through of a wall — occurs in only two verses in the whole Hebrew Bible: here, and in Jeremiah's indictment of Judah. There the LORD charges, "your skirts are stained with the blood of the innocent poor, though you did not find them breaking in" (Jeremiah 2:34, BSB) — KJV: "I have not found it by secret search, but upon all these." The prophet turns the very statute of Exodus 22 against the nation: the law cleared a man who killed an intruder caught in the act of maḥteret; Judah has shed innocent blood where no such break-in could be pleaded. The exemption of the property law becomes the measure of the nation's guilt. The same plural-of-bloodguilt, dāmîm (H1818), runs through both.
Exodus 22:2 · Jeremiah 2:34
basis: Verifier on Exodus 22:2 ↔ Jeremiah 2:34 returns the RARE shared lexeme H4290 machtereth (in only 2 vv — these are the sole two occurrences canon-wide), plus H1818 dâm (295 vv) and H4672 mâtsâʼ (425 vv). The rarity of machtereth (2 vv) supports the verbal tier; Jeremiah's application of the statute is interpretive, but the shared technical term is exact.
The ox repaid → the case-law of the goring ox structural / thematic — confirmed
This property law does not begin in a vacuum: it grows straight out of the ox-statutes that close the previous chapter. Exodus 21:36 had already ruled that the owner of an ox known to gore "shall surely repay (shâlam) ox for ox" (shôwr taḥat hashshôwr) — the very pairing of the gored beast "in the place of" (taḥat) the one lost that v. 1 reuses for the stolen ox repaid fivefold. The same three pillars of the chapter's grammar — the ox (shôwr), the make-whole verb (shâlam), and the substitution preposition (taḥat, "under / in-place-of") — bind the goring-ox law of ch. 21 to the theft-of-ox law of ch. 22 into one continuous body of restitution case-law.
Exodus 22:1 · Exodus 21:36
basis: Verifier on Exodus 22:1 ↔ Exodus 21:36 returns shared lexemes H7794 shôwr (69 vv), H7999 shâlam (107 vv), H8478 tachath (450 vv) and H176 ʼôw (218 vv) — all common lexemes shared because both are restitution case-laws about the ox, not a quotation. Tiered structural/thematic: the connection is the shared statutory pattern (ox-for-ox, repaid, in-place-of), not a rare or cited word.