The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

Ezra5:1–5

Temple Rebuilding Resumes

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

Ezra 5:1–5 — Temple Rebuilding Resumes. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

1

Later, the prophets Haggai and Zechariah son of Iddo prophesied to the Jews in Judah and Jerusalem in the name of the God of Israel, who was over them.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

nə·ḇī·ʾå̄h ḥag·gay ū·zə·ḵar·yāh ḇar- ‘id·dō·w wə·hiṯ·nab·bî nə·ḇī·ʾay·yå̄ ‘al- yə·hū·ḏā·yê dî ḇî·hūḏ ū·ḇî·rū·šə·lem bə·šum ’ĕ·lāh yiś·rā·’êl ‘ă·lê·hō·wn

Word by word16 · parsed
נְבִיאָהnə·ḇī·ʾå̄hLater, the prophetsH5029
√ nᵉbîyʼ — a prophetNounmasculine singular determinate
nᵉbîyʼ: a prophet The determinate form, "the prophet," is rare in this corpus (H5029 stands in only 3 verses), and it appears twice in this single verse, once singular for Haggai and once plural for the pair. Cambridge notes that the title looks "superfluous" after the plural, but that Ezra 6:14 and Haggai 1:1 show "the phrase was commonly attached to Haggai's name." Ezra is not padding: he is naming an office, the one instrument by which a stalled work is restarted.
חַגַּ֣יḥag·gayHaggaiH2292
√ Chaggay — Chaggai, a Hebrew prophetNounpropermasculine singular
וּזְכַרְיָ֤הū·zə·ḵar·yāhand ZechariahH2148
√ Zᵉkaryâh — Zecarjah, the name of twenty-nine IsraelitesConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
בַר־ḇar-sonH1247
√ bar — a son, grandson, etcNounmasculine singular construct
עִדּוֹא֙‘id·dō·wof IddoH5714
√ ʻIddôw — Iddo (or Iddi), the name of five IsraelitesNounpropermasculine singular
וְהִתְנַבִּ֞יwə·hiṯ·nab·bîprophesiedH5013
√ nᵉbâʼ — {to prophesy, iConjunctive wawVerbHitpaelConjunctive perfectthird person masculine singular
nᵉbâʼ: to prophesy (Hitpael) The reflexive stem, plus a perfect that is singular against two named subjects, gives the sentence a stammering, eyewitness quality. Ellicott presses the historical force: the prophets "reveal a state of apathy which Ezra does not allude to," a paralysis that "would have thwarted the whole design of Providence had it not been changed." JFB dates the paralysis: "For fifteen years the work was completely suspended."
נְבִיאַיָּאnə·ḇī·ʾay·yå̄H5029
√ nᵉbîyʼ — a prophetNounmasculine plural determinate
עַל־‘al-toH5922
√ ʻal — {above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applications}Preposition
ʻal: upon, over, against Function word, but load-bearing here. K&D defends the sense "to" by appeal to Ezekiel 37:4, where ʻal stands where ʼel would be expected.
יְה֣וּדָיֵ֔אyə·hū·ḏā·yêthe JewsH3062
√ Yᵉhûwdâʼîy — a Jehudaite (or Judaite), iNounpropermasculine singular
דִּ֥יH1768
√ dîy — that, used as relative conjunction, and especially (with a preposition) in adverbial phrasesPronounrelative
בִיה֖וּדḇî·hūḏin JudahH3061
√ Yᵉhûwd — properly, Judah, hence, JudaeaPreposition-bNounpropermasculine singular
וּבִירוּשְׁלֶ֑םū·ḇî·rū·šə·lemand JerusalemH3390
√ Yᵉrûwshâlêm — {Jerusalem}Conjunctive waw, Preposition-bNounproperfeminine singular
בְּשֻׁ֛םbə·šumin the nameH8036
√ shum — {an appellation, as amark or memorial of individualityPreposition-bNounmasculine singular construct
shum: an appellation, a mark or memorial of individuality H8036 is uncommon (10 verses), and the construct "in-the-name-of" is the whole warrant of the two prophets: they carry no imperial commission, only a Name. The same noun becomes the satrap's weapon in v. 4, where he demands the names of the men. The unit turns on a contest of names, one asked for by Persia and one invoked from heaven.
אֱלָ֥הּ’ĕ·lāhof the GodH426
√ ʼĕlâhh — GodNounmasculine singular construct
ʼĕlâhh: God Here in the construct and undetermined, "God of Israel," the covenant title rather than the generic Aramaic deity word used by the officials later in the chapter. The distinction matters: the prophets speak in the name of a God who has bound himself to a particular people.
יִשְׂרָאֵ֖לyiś·rā·’êlof IsraelH3479
√ Yisrâʼêl — {Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
עֲלֵיהֽוֹן׃ס‘ă·lê·hō·wnwho was over themH5922
√ ʻal — {above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applications}Prepositionthird person masculine plural
ʻal: upon (with third masculine plural suffix) Two words end the verse and they resist translation. Cambridge admits the rendering "which was upon them" is "a harsh condensed expression," yet "seems preferable," and points to Jeremiah 15:16, "I am called by Thy name." K&D reads it as God "who was come upon them, had manifested Himself to them." ⚙ Either way the verse ends where v. 5 will end: with God over this people, not Persia.
2

Then Zerubbabel son of Shealtiel and Jeshua son of Jozadak rose up and began to rebuild the house of God in Jerusalem. And the prophets of God were with them, helping them.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

bê·ḏa·yin zə·rub·bā·ḇel bar- šə·’al·tî·’êl wə·yê·šū·a‘ bar- yō·w·ṣā·ḏāq qā·mū wə·šā·rîw lə·miḇ·nê bêṯ ’ĕ·lā·hā ḇî·rū·šə·lem nə·ḇī·ʾay·yå̄ ḏî- dî ’ĕ·lā·hā wə·‘im·mə·hō·wn mə·sā·‘ă·ḏîn lə·hō·wn

Word by word20 · parsed
בֵּאדַ֡יִןbê·ḏa·yinThenH116
√ ʼĕdayin — then (of time)Preposition-bAdverb
ʼĕdayin: then (of time) With the preposition, "in that very then." A common Aramaic connector (H116 stands in 53 verses) and the narrative hinge of this chapter, used again at v. 4 and v. 5.
זְרֻבָּבֶ֤לzə·rub·bā·ḇelZerubbabelH2217
√ Zᵉrubbâbel — {Zerubbabel, an Israelite}Nounpropermasculine singular
בַּר־bar-sonH1247
√ bar — a son, grandson, etcNounmasculine singular construct
שְׁאַלְתִּיאֵל֙šə·’al·tî·’êlof ShealtielH7598
√ Shᵉʼaltîyʼêl — {Shealtiel, an Israelite}Nounpropermasculine singular
וְיֵשׁ֣וּעַwə·yê·šū·a‘and JeshuaH3443
√ Yêshûwaʻ — {Jeshua, the name of ten Israelites, also of a place in Palestine}Conjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
בַּר־bar-sonH1247
√ bar — a son, grandson, etcNounmasculine singular construct
יֽוֹצָדָ֔קyō·w·ṣā·ḏāqof JozadakH3136
√ Yôwtsâdâq — Jotsadak, an IsraeliteNounpropermasculine singular
קָ֠מוּqā·mūrose upH6966
√ qûwm — {to rise (in various applications, literal, figurative, intensive and causative)}VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine plural
qûwm: to rise ⚙ The same root that Persian decrees use for establishing an order is here used of two men standing up under a word from God rather than a word from a king. K&D fixes the speed of it: Haggai began on the first day of the sixth month, and "his first address made such an impression" that the leaders "set about the intermitted work of building as early as the twenty-fourth day of the same month." Twenty-three days from sermon to shovel.
וְשָׁרִ֣יוwə·šā·rîwand beganH8271
√ shᵉrêʼ — to free, separateConjunctive wawVerbPielConjunctive perfectthird person masculine plural
shᵉrêʼ: to free, separate (Piel) The theologically weightiest verb in the verse. It is not a neutral "start": the stem is intensive and the root is release. Barnes: "made a second beginning." The obstruction of Ezra 4:24 is untied, and nothing in the verse says Darius untied it.
לְמִבְנֵ֔אlə·miḇ·nêto rebuildH1124
√ bᵉnâʼ — to buildPreposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
bᵉnâʼ: to build Infinitive construct with lamed, the purpose of the rising. The same infinitive will be thrown back at them as an accusation in v. 3 ("to rebuild this temple") and as a description in v. 4 ("are constructing").
בֵּ֥יתbêṯthe houseH1005
√ bayith — {a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcNounmasculine singular construct
bayith: a house In Aramaic Ezra this noun is the contested object of the whole book (H1005 stands in 38 verses). Here it carries both the divine genitive and the determinate ending, the house of the God. In v. 3 the same noun comes back from the satrap stripped of its owner, and in v. 4 it is demoted again to binyan, a mere edifice. The narrative lets you tell who is speaking by what the building is called.
אֱלָהָ֖א’ĕ·lā·hāof GodH426
√ ʼĕlâhh — GodNounmasculine singular determinate
בִירֽוּשְׁלֶ֑םḇî·rū·šə·lemin JerusalemH3390
√ Yᵉrûwshâlêm — {Jerusalem}Preposition-bNounproperfeminine singular
נְבִיאַיָּאnə·ḇī·ʾay·yå̄And the prophetsH5029
√ nᵉbîyʼ — a prophetNounmasculine plural determinate
nᵉbîyʼ: a prophet (plural determinate) The prophets are named twice in two verses and are physically present at the site, not merely quoted. Ellicott: "In these two prophets we can read the invigorating sayings that encouraged the people almost from day to day and from stage to stage of their work."
דִֽי־ḏî-. . .H1768
√ dîy — that, used as relative conjunction, and especially (with a preposition) in adverbial phrasesPronounrelative
דִּ֣יofH1768
√ dîy — that, used as relative conjunction, and especially (with a preposition) in adverbial phrasesPronounrelative
אֱלָהָ֖א’ĕ·lā·hāGodH426
√ ʼĕlâhh — GodNounmasculine singular determinate
וְעִמְּה֛וֹןwə·‘im·mə·hō·wnwere with themH5974
√ ʻim — {adverb or preposition, with (iConjunctive wawPrepositionthird person masculine plural
מְסָעֲדִ֥יןmə·sā·‘ă·ḏînhelpingH5583
√ çᵉʻad — to aidVerbPielParticiplemasculine plural
çᵉʻad: to aid (Piel participle) Pulpit itemizes the propping under four heads out of Haggai and Zechariah: direct command, warning, exhortation, and encouraging prophecy, including "The hands of Zerubbabel have laid the foundation of this house; his hands shall also finish it" (Zechariah 4:9). Geneva adds the harsher half, that the prophets "cursed them because they were more careful to build their own houses." ⚙ The participle holds both: the help is unbroken, and part of the help is rebuke.
לְהֽוֹן׃פlə·hō·wnthem
Prepositionthird person masculine plural
3

At that time Tattenai the governor of the region west of the Euphrates, Shethar-bozenai, and their associates went to the Jews and asked, “Who authorized you to rebuild this temple and restore this structure?”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

bêh- zim·nā tat·tə·nay pa·ḥaṯ ‘ă·ḇar- na·hă·rāh ū·šə·ṯar bō·wz·nay ū·ḵə·nā·wā·ṯə·hō·wn wə·ḵên ’ă·ṯā ‘ă·lê·hō·wn ’ā·mə·rîn lə·hōm man- śām lə·ḵōm ṭə·‘êm lib·bə·nê ḏə·nāh bay·ṯā lə·šaḵ·lā·lāh ḏə·nāh wə·’uš·šar·nā

Word by word24 · parsed
בֵּהּ־bêh-
Prepositionthird person masculine singular
זִמְנָא֩zim·nāAt that timeH2166
√ zᵉmân — {an appointed occasion}Nounmasculine singular determinate
zᵉmân: an appointed occasion Not bare clock time but a set moment. ⚙ Benson hears the timing as pointed: "No sooner did the Spirit of God stir up the friends of the temple to appear for it, but the evil spirit stirred up its enemies to appear against it."
תַּ֠תְּנַיtat·tə·nayTattenaiH8674
√ Tattᵉnay — Tattenai, a PersianNounpropermasculine singular
פַּחַ֧תpa·ḥaṯthe governorH6347
√ pechâh — {a prefect (of a city or small district)}Nounmasculine singular construct
pechâh: a prefect (of a city or small district) The word cuts both ways, and Pulpit sees the irony: it is "the same which is assigned to Zerubbabel, both in Ezra 6:7 and in Haggai," a "somewhat vague term of authority" whose "etymology is uncertain, but seems not to be Semitic." Cambridge places Tattenai in the Persian system as satrap of the whole trans-Euphrates district, and JFB adds that Syria was one of twenty satrapies furnishing "three hundred fifty talents" a year. Rank is settled not by the title but by the phrase that follows it.
עֲבַֽר־‘ă·ḇar-[of the region] westH5675
√ ʻăbar — {properly, a region acrossNounmasculine singular construct
ʻăbar: properly, a region across "Beyond the River" is a fixed imperial toponym, not a description from a Babylonian vantage point. Cambridge: "It was the technical title of the governor of that satrapy. It appears on the coins of the Persian empire."
נַהֲרָ֛הna·hă·rāhof the EuphratesH5103
√ nᵉhar — a river, especially the EuphratesNounmasculine singular determinate
וּשְׁתַ֥רū·šə·ṯarvvvH8370
√ Shᵉthar Bôwzᵉnay — Shethar-Bozenai, a Persian officerConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
בּוֹזְנַ֖יbō·wz·nayShethar-bozenaiH8370
√ Shᵉthar Bôwzᵉnay — Shethar-Bozenai, a Persian officerConjunctive wawNounpropermasculine singular
וּכְנָוָתְה֑וֹןū·ḵə·nā·wā·ṯə·hō·wnand their associatesH3675
√ kᵉnâth — {a colleague (as having the same title)}Conjunctive wawNounmasculine plural constructthird person masculine plural
וְכֵן֙wə·ḵên. . .H3652
√ kên — soConjunctive wawAdverb
אֲתָ֨א’ă·ṯāwentH858
√ ʼâthâh — {to arrive}VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
עֲלֵיה֜וֹן‘ă·lê·hō·wnto [the Jews]H5922
√ ʻal — {above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applications}Prepositionthird person masculine plural
אָמְרִ֣ין’ā·mə·rînand askedH560
√ ʼămar — {to say (used with great latitude)}VerbQalParticiplemasculine plural
לְהֹ֔םlə·hōm
Prepositionthird person masculine plural
מַן־man-WhoH4479
√ mân — who or what (properly, interrogatively, hence, also indefinitely and relatively)Interrogative
שָׂ֨םśāmauthorized youH7761
√ sûwm — {to put (used in a great variety of applications, literal, figurative, inferentially, and elliptically)}VerbQalPerfectthird person masculine singular
sûwm: to put, set Qal perfect third masculine singular with an interrogative subject: "who set for you." ⚙ In Persian usage a decree is placed like a stone. The verse asks whose placing stands behind the building, and v. 5 answers with something no one placed: an eye.
לְכֹ֜םlə·ḵōm
Prepositionsecond person masculine plural
טְעֵ֗םṭə·‘êmH2942
√ ṭᵉʻêm — properly, flavorNounmasculine singular
ṭᵉʻêm: properly, flavor The central word of the interrogation and the hinge of the whole chapter. Because a decree in Aramaic is a "taste," what Tattenai wants is the documentary residue of Cyrus, and Barnes concedes he had a case: "There was no doubt a formal illegality in the conduct of Zerubbabel and Jeshua: since all edicts of Persian kings continued in force unless revoked by their successors." Ellicott adds that the decree of chapter 4 "had never been expressly revoked." The builders are, in Persian law, out of order and in the right.
לִבְּנֵ֔אlib·bə·nêto rebuildH1124
√ bᵉnâʼ — to buildPreposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
דְנָה֙ḏə·nāhthisH1836
√ dên — thisPronounmasculine singular
בַּיְתָ֤אbay·ṯātempleH1005
√ bayith — {a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etcNounmasculine singular determinate
bayith: a house Determinate but stripped of the divine genitive it carried in v. 2: "this house," with the demonstrative preceding it. ⚙ The officials can see the masonry and not the owner.
לְשַׁכְלָלָֽה׃סlə·šaḵ·lā·lāhand restoreH3635
√ kᵉlal — to completePreposition-lVerbHifilInfinitive construct
kᵉlal: to complete (Hifil) Causative completion. The demand is not only for a permit to begin but for a permit to finish, which is precisely what Zechariah 4:9 had just promised the builders in God's name.
דְנָ֖הḏə·nāhthisH1836
√ dên — thisPronounmasculine singular
וְאֻשַּׁרְנָ֥אwə·’uš·šar·nāstructureH846
√ ʼushsharnâʼ — a wall (from its uprightness)Conjunctive wawNounmasculine singular determinate
ʼushsharnâʼ: a wall (from its uprightness) A word occurring twice in Scripture, both times in this chapter, whose sense is disputed among the sources: wall, structure, roof, or materials. Gill, reading it as the temple's own rising walls rather than a surrounding enclosure, judges that "by this time they had raised up the walls of the temple from its foundation to some height." ⚙ Any confident English rendering here is a choice among live options, and we mark it as such.
4

They also asked, “What are the names of the men who are constructing this building?”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

’ĕ·ḏa·yin kə·nê·mā ’ă·mar·nā lə·hōm man- ’in·nūn šə·mā·hāṯ guḇ·ray·yā dî- bā·na·yin ḏə·nāh ḇin·yā·nā

Word by word12 · parsed
אֱדַ֥יִן’ĕ·ḏa·yinThey alsoH116
√ ʼĕdayin — then (of time)Adverb
ʼĕdayin: then (of time) The bare adverb, without the preposition it carried in v. 2.
כְּנֵ֖מָאkə·nê·mā. . .H3660
√ kᵉnêmâʼ — so or thusAdverb
אֲמַ֣רְנָא’ă·mar·nāaskedH560
√ ʼămar — {to say (used with great latitude)}VerbQalPerfectfirst person common plural
ʼămar: to say (with great latitude) The whole difficulty of the verse sits in one suffix. K&D: "From אמרנא, we said, it is obvious that the author of this account was an eye-witness of, and sharer in, the work of building," and he holds that there is no reason to alter the form, "the εἴποσαν of the lxx being no critical authority for so doing." Cambridge takes the opposite view and calls the received reading "practically unintelligible." ⚙ We leave the crux open: the received Aramaic says "we," the versions say "they," and the sense of v. 10 favors the versions.
לְּהֹ֑םlə·hōm
Prepositionthird person masculine plural
מַן־man-WhatH4479
√ mân — who or what (properly, interrogatively, hence, also indefinitely and relatively)Interrogative
mân: who or what Interrogative and indefinite. Poole and Cambridge both read it as "what" here, on the strength of Aramaic usage at Daniel 4:17.
אִנּוּן֙’in·nūnareH581
√ ʼinnûwn — theyPronounthird person masculine plural
שְׁמָהָ֣תšə·mā·hāṯthe namesH8036
√ shum — {an appellation, as amark or memorial of individualityNounmasculine plural construct
shum: an appellation, a mark or memorial of individuality The lexicon gloss is worth weighing: a name is a "mark or memorial of individuality." What Tattenai wants is not a list but liability, individual men attachable to an unauthorized act. Gill sees the courage of the reply: they "made no scruple of telling them who they were."
גֻּבְרַיָּ֔אguḇ·ray·yāof the menH1400
√ gᵉbar — {a person}Nounmasculine plural determinate
דִּֽי־dî-whoH1768
√ dîy — that, used as relative conjunction, and especially (with a preposition) in adverbial phrasesPronounrelative
בָּנַֽיִן׃bā·na·yinare constructingH1124
√ bᵉnâʼ — to buildVerbQalParticiplemasculine plural
bᵉnâʼ: to build (participle) A participle, not a perfect: the building is in progress while the interrogation happens. Pulpit notes that the work "went on uninterruptedly during the whole time that the messengers were away."
דְנָ֥הḏə·nāhthisH1836
√ dên — thisPronounmasculine singular
בִנְיָנָ֖אḇin·yā·nābuildingH1147
√ binyân — {an edifice}Nounmasculine singular determinate
binyân: an edifice A rare noun in this corpus and the officials' own term for the site. ⚙ Naming it a mere edifice is what makes the next verse's correction so abrupt: the eye of their God was on it.
5

But the eye of their God was on the elders of the Jews, so that they were not stopped until a report was sent to Darius and written instructions about this matter were returned.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·‘ên ’ĕ·lā·hă·hōm hă·wāṯ ‘al- śā·ḇê yə·hū·ḏā·yê wə·lā- ḇaṭ·ṭi·lū him·mōw ‘aḏ- ṭa‘·mā yə·hāḵ lə·ḏā·rə·yā·weš we·’ĕ·ḏa·yin niš·tə·wā·nā ‘al- də·nāh yə·ṯî·ḇūn

Word by word18 · parsed
וְעֵ֣יןwə·‘ênBut the eyeH5870
√ ʻayin — an eyeConjunctive wawNounfeminine singular construct
ʻayin: an eye The theological center of the unit, and the answer to the satrap's "Who set for you a decree?" No document is produced. Instead the narrator reports a gaze. Gill links it to 2 Chronicles 16:9; Cambridge to Deuteronomy 11:12 and Psalm 34:15; Pulpit to Job 36:7, "He withdraweth not his eyes from them." JFB reads the placement as deliberate: "The historian, therefore, with characteristic piety, throws in this parenthetical verse."
אֱלָהֲהֹ֗ם’ĕ·lā·hă·hōmof their GodH426
√ ʼĕlâhh — GodNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine plural
ʼĕlâhh: God (with third masculine plural suffix) "Their God," the possessive the officials would never have used, and the only point in this unit where the divine name is bound by a suffix to one particular people. Against Tattenai's ownerless this house (v. 3) and this edifice (v. 4), the narrator sets their God, and it is that relation, not a permit, that the rest of the verse turns on. In v. 3 they said only "this house."
הֲוָת֙hă·wāṯwasH1934
√ hâvâʼ — to existVerbQalPerfectthird person feminine singular
hâvâʼ: to exist Qal perfect third person feminine singular, agreeing with the feminine noun eye. A completed state, not a wish: the eye was there while the interrogation happened.
עַל־‘al-onH5922
√ ʻal — {above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applications}Preposition
שָׂבֵ֣יśā·ḇêthe eldersH7868
√ sîyb — {properly, to become aged, iNounmasculine plural construct
sîyb: properly, to become aged, an elder The elders, not Zerubbabel and Jeshua, are the object of the gaze here, though vv. 1 to 2 named the two leaders. Cambridge compares Ezra 10:8, "the princes and elders," and records that the LXX "by a strange mistake render 'the captivity'." ⚙ The protection lands on the ordinary governing body of the community, the men who would actually be arrested.
יְהוּדָיֵ֔אyə·hū·ḏā·yêof the JewsH3062
√ Yᵉhûwdâʼîy — a Jehudaite (or Judaite), iNounpropermasculine singular
וְלָא־wə·lā-so that they were notH3809
√ lâʼ — {not (the simple or absConjunctive wawAdverbNegative particle
בַטִּ֣לוּḇaṭ·ṭi·lūstoppedH989
√ bᵉṭêl — to stopVerbPielPerfectthird person masculine plural
bᵉṭêl: to stop (Piel) The verb of Ezra 4:23 to 24, where the work was in fact made to cease. Its negation here is the reversal of that whole chapter. Cambridge: "God's favour was shewn in that Tattenai did not immediately stop the work, but let it go on until he learned his master's wishes." Poole presses the causation further: "because God overruled their hearts and hands, that they did not hinder them by force, as they could have done." ⚙ Providence here works not by removing the officials' power but by not moving their hands.
הִמּ֔וֹhim·mōwH1994
√ himmôw — theyPronounthird person masculine plural
עַד־‘aḏ-untilH5705
√ ʻad — {as far (or long, or much) as, whether of space (even unto) or time (during, while, until) or degree (equally with)}Preposition
טַעְמָ֖אṭa‘·māa reportH2941
√ ṭaʻam — properly, a taste, iNounmasculine singular determinate
ṭaʻam: properly, a taste Rendered "a report" by BSB and "the matter" by K&D. The same root that was the imperial decree in v. 3 is now the unresolved question traveling to Babylon. ⚙ The empire's instrument of prohibition has become a file in transit, and the temple rises during the transit.
יְהָ֑ךְyə·hāḵwas sentH1946
√ hûwk — to goVerbQalImperfectthird person masculine singular
hûwk: to go Fut. Peal of the go-verb, formed, as K&D observes, by the rejection of the lamed of the root and then construed with the preposition lamed: it signifies going to a place, where K&D compares Ezra 7:13, or coming to a person. K&D also rejects Bertheau's temporal reading here, since in Aramaic the lamed marks a genitive only in statements of time. The matter is the thing that travels; the building stays where it is.
לְדָרְיָ֣וֶשׁlə·ḏā·rə·yā·wešto DariusH1868
√ Dârᵉyâvêsh — {Darejavesh, a title (rather than name) of several Persian kings}Preposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
וֶאֱדַ֛יִןwe·’ĕ·ḏa·yinandH116
√ ʼĕdayin — then (of time)Conjunctive wawAdverb
נִשְׁתְּוָנָ֖אniš·tə·wā·nāwritten instructionsH5407
√ nishtᵉvân — {an epistle}Nounmasculine singular determinate
nishtᵉvân: an epistle A rare Persian loanword (H5407, also Ezra 4:7). Cambridge weighs whose letter it is: the king's answer to Tattenai, or Tattenai's final reply to the Jews, and prefers the former "on account of the formal 'by letter'." ⚙ The chapter ends with paper still in motion. The eye does not.
עַל־‘al-aboutH5922
√ ʻal — {above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applications}Preposition
דְּנָֽה׃פdə·nāhthis matterH1836
√ dên — thisPronounmasculine singular
יְתִיב֥וּןyə·ṯî·ḇūnwere returnedH8421
√ tûwb — specifically (transitive and ellipVerbHifilImperfectthird person masculine plural
tûwb: to bring back (Hifil) Causative and imperfect: someone will cause an answer to come back. The unit therefore closes unresolved, on an expectation, which is exactly the space in which the temple is built.

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. The word that unties the work — vv. 1 to 2

The unit opens with no royal permission and no change of policy, only two men speaking. The Aramaic piles the office up twice in one verse, נְבִיאָה singular for Haggai and נְבִיאַיָּא plural for the pair (H5029, a title standing in only three verses of this corpus), and Cambridge explains the apparent redundancy from Ezra 6:14 and Haggai 1:1, where "the phrase was commonly attached to Haggai's name." Ellicott says plainly what Ezra does not: the prophets "reveal a state of apathy which Ezra does not allude to," and JFB dates the apathy, "For fifteen years the work was completely suspended." Then comes the verb of v. 2. BSB's "began" translates וְשָׁרִיו (H8271), whose lexicon root is "to free, separate": in the Piel it looses what was bound. Barnes catches the force in four words, "made a second beginning," and Cambridge fixes the history, "The work was now recommenced." K&D supplies the calendar that makes the loosing astonishing: Haggai spoke on the first day of the sixth month and "his first address made such an impression" that the leaders resumed "as early as the twenty-fourth day of the same month." ⚙ Twenty-three days undid fifteen years, and the only new authority in the room was a Name (v. 1, בְּשֻׁם, H8036).

ii. Two questions from Beyond the River — vv. 3 to 4

The empire arrives with a title and a demand for paperwork. Cambridge places Tattenai exactly: "Tattenai was therefore a man of the greatest eminence in Syria, next to the king himself," and notes that "governor beyond the river" was a technical satrapal title that "appears on the coins of the Persian empire." Pulpit observes the barb in the word itself: pechâh is "the same which is assigned to Zerubbabel," so the same noun names both the interrogator and one of the accused, and only the phrase that follows sorts out rank. The question is precise. Cambridge: "The original requires the more weighty and official 'decree'" for טְעֵם (H2942, literally "flavor"), and Barnes concedes the legal merit of it: "There was no doubt a formal illegality in the conduct of Zerubbabel and Jeshua: since all edicts of Persian kings continued in force unless revoked by their successors." Ellicott adds that the prohibition of Ezra 4 "had never been expressly revoked." The second question, in v. 4, asks for שְׁמָהָת, names, which Ellicott says were wanted "in order to make them responsible." ⚙ Note the vocabulary: the prophets came with one Name and the empire demands a list of names. Gill records how the elders answered, they "made no scruple of telling them who they were." The verse's own grammar is contested. The received Aramaic reads first person, "we said" (H560, first person common plural), which K&D treats as the fingerprint of an eyewitness and refuses to emend; Barnes reports that the Septuagint, Syriac and Arabic read "they said"; Pulpit judges the text unsound; Cambridge calls the received reading "practically unintelligible," then honestly warns that his own preferred emendation "is the easier reading, and is therefore perhaps to be suspected as a correction."

iii. The eye, and the unanswered letter — v. 5

The narrator answers Tattenai's question, and the answer is not a document. וְעֵין אֱלָהֲהֹם: the eye, singular, of their God, with a feminine singular verb to match. Cambridge sets it beside Deuteronomy 11:12, Psalm 33:18 and Psalm 34:15; Pulpit adds Job 36:7, "He withdraweth not his eyes from them," and glosses the watching as "a jealous watchfulness, which never for a moment slackens." JFB reads the placement as the historian's own theology: "The historian, therefore, with characteristic piety, throws in this parenthetical verse." The next verb decides how the protection worked. בַטִּלוּ is Piel, causative, and Cambridge corrects the A.V. accordingly: not "could not cause them to cease" but "and they did not make them cease," which "gives the original accurately." K&D says the officials "had power to prohibit them" and did not use it; Poole presses to the cause, "God overruled their hearts and hands, that they did not hinder them by force, as they could have done." ⚙ The deliverance is not that the satrap lacked authority. It is that authority was left in his hands and not exercised. Then the unit ends in mid-air: the טַעְמָא (the same "taste" noun that meant decree in v. 3, but here, K&D says, "the matter, causa, which the king is to decide") travels to Darius, and a נִשְׁתְּוָנָא, an epistle, is to be brought back (Hifil imperfect). Cambridge insists both clauses still hang under the "until." So the temple rises inside an interval where nothing has been settled, and Henry draws the line that the whole unit invites: "While employed in God's work, we are under his special protection; his eye is upon us for good."

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested by Scripture. Read the unit as a quiet argument about what authorizes a work of God. Tattenai asks the only question an empire can ask: who set (שָׂם, H7761) a decree for you, produce the paper. On that question the builders lose. Barnes concedes the formal illegality, Ellicott concedes the earlier prohibition was never revoked, and neither the prophets in v. 1 nor the leaders in v. 2 claim a permit. What they have instead is a Name invoked over them (v. 1) and a word that untied work fifteen years bound (v. 2, the Piel of shᵉrêʼ, "to free"). Then v. 5 refuses the terms of the interrogation altogether. Asked for a document, the narrator reports an eye: singular, feminine-agreeing, fixed not on the two famous leaders but on the elders, the men who would actually have been arrested. And the protection takes a strange form. The Aramaic is careful and the sources are careful with it: the officials did not make them cease, though K&D says they could have. Nothing was removed from Tattenai's hand. The work was simply not stopped, in a gap of paperwork that lasted as long as a courier's round trip. ⚙ We take the unit to be saying that God's work is not underwritten by imperial permission and not usually rescued by imperial collapse either. It goes forward in the interval that providence holds open while the letters travel, and the builders are told to build in that interval without knowing the verdict. The temple of Ezra 6 was finished inside an unanswered question. Test this: the text nowhere says the elders knew they were safe, and any reading that promises certainty rather than protection has added something the Aramaic did not say.

The eye was the only permit they had, and it was enough for the length of a courier's journey. (This line is the tool's own synthesis, not Scripture.)

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The same two prophets, named again at the finish verbal / quotation: confirmed

Ezra says the temple was completed "through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah son of Iddo" (Ezra 6:14), reusing the vocabulary of this unit's opening verse. The Verifier confirms three shared lexemes, and one of them is genuinely rare in this corpus: נְבִיאָה (H5029 nᵉbîyʼ) stands in only 3 verses, while H5714 ʻIddôw stands in 9 and H1247 bar in 7. Cambridge reads the two verses together deliberately, citing Ezra 6:14 to explain why the title "the prophet" clings to Haggai's name here. ⚙ The frame is authorial: the men who restarted the work in 5:1 are credited by name when it is done, and the Persian decrees that fill the intervening chapter are not.

Ezra 6:14

basis: Verifier: shared Aramaic lexemes H5029 nᵉbîyʼ (rare, in 3 vv), H5714 ʻIddôw (in 9 vv), H1247 bar (in 7 vv). The rarity of H5029 plus the identical name pairing makes this a real verbal repetition inside one book, not merely a shared theme.

The interrogation quoted back inside the letter structural / thematic: confirmed

The question of v. 3 reappears in Tattenai's own dispatch at Ezra 5:9, and the demand for names of v. 4 reappears at Ezra 5:10. The Verifier records shared lexemes for the nearer verse: H116 ʼĕdayin (in 53 vv), H1005 bayith (in 38 vv), H1124 bᵉnâʼ (in 19 vv). None of these is rare, so the computed basis alone will not carry a quotation claim. Cambridge supplies the literary observation instead: "The first interrogation is repeated verbatim (Ezra 5:9)," and the second "is described (Ezra 5:10), 'We asked them their names also', in a manner exactly corresponding to the present verse." K&D reasons from the same correspondence that the on-site dialogue here is "reported only by a short extract restricted to the principal subjects." ⚙ We tier this structurally and let Cambridge's reading of the correspondence stand as a commentator's judgment rather than as a Verifier-confirmed verbal link.

Ezra 5:9 · Ezra 5:11

basis: Verifier: shared Aramaic lexemes H116 ʼĕdayin (in 53 vv), H1005 bayith (in 38 vv), H1124 bᵉnâʼ (in 19 vv) for Ezra 5:9; H1768 dîy (186 vv), H3479 Yisrâʼêl (in 7 vv), H426 ʼĕlâhh (in 78 vv) for Ezra 5:11. All common, so the link is recorded as shared pattern (the same interrogation restated inside the official letter), not as a quotation.

The verb that stopped the work, now negated structural / thematic: confirmed

At Ezra 4:23 to 24 the work on the house of God was made to cease by force; at 5:5 the same causative verb בַטִּלוּ (H989 bᵉṭêl, Piel) is negated, and the officials who could have stopped it do not. The Verifier's computed basis for the nearby verses is thin (H1768 dîy in 186 vv, H5922 ʻal in 86 vv, H3390 Yᵉrûwshâlêm in 25 vv), so the weight of the link is the shared stopping-motif, not lexical rarity. Cambridge makes the contrast explicit: God's favour "was shewn in that Tattenai did not immediately stop the work." Poole gives the mechanism: "God overruled their hearts and hands, that they did not hinder them by force, as they could have done." ⚙ Chapter 4 is undone not by a counter-decree but by a restraint laid on the hands of men who still held the power.

Ezra 4:23 · Ezra 4:24

basis: Verifier: shared Aramaic lexemes H1768 dîy (in 186 vv), H5922 ʻal (in 86 vv), H3390 Yᵉrûwshâlêm (in 25 vv) for Ezra 4:23, and H1768, H426 ʼĕlâhh, H3390 for Ezra 4:24. All common lexemes; recorded as a reversal of the same motif (the work made to cease, then not made to cease), with no quotation claimed.

God with his servants in the other Aramaic island structural / thematic: confirmed

Ezra 4 to 6 and Daniel 2 to 7 are the two Aramaic stretches of the Old Testament, and the Verifier pairs this unit with Daniel 3:25, where a fourth figure walks in the furnace and is called "a son of the gods." The shared lexemes are H1247 bar (in 7 vv), H1768 dîy (in 186 vv) and H426 ʼĕlâhh (in 78 vv). Bar and ʼĕlâhh are the ordinary building blocks of the dialect, so nothing verbal can be claimed here. What is shared is the situation: an imperial officer with full authority to destroy, a small group of Judeans working or standing under that authority, and a divine presence the officials can see the effect of but not the cause. ⚙ Ezra 5:5 gives the undramatic version of Daniel 3: no furnace, no visible fourth man, just an eye and a satrap whose hand stays down. Poole's reading of the mechanism ("God overruled their hearts and hands") is the same providence in a lower key.

Daniel 3:25 · Daniel 6:2

basis: Verifier: shared Aramaic lexemes H1247 bar (in 7 vv), H1768 dîy (in 186 vv), H426 ʼĕlâhh (in 78 vv). These are common dialect words, so the basis recorded is the shared setting and motif (Judeans under Gentile imperial power, divinely preserved), not a verbal echo.

The eye of the LORD, in Hebrew Scripture structural / thematic: confirmed

Cambridge reads Ezra 5:5 against Deuteronomy 11:12, "a land which God careth for; the eyes of the Lord thy God are always upon it," and Psalm 33:18 and Psalm 34:15; Pulpit adds Job 36:7, "He withdraweth not his eyes from them"; Gill points to 2 Chronicles 16:9. These are real and ancient associations, but they cannot be verbal links in the Verifier's sense: this verse is Aramaic, and its עֵין carries Strong's H5870, a different number from the Hebrew H5869 of those passages. No shared Strong's lexeme exists to be counted. ⚙ We therefore record this as a motif link only, and note the one thing the Aramaic adds to the Hebrew idiom: here the noun and its verb are singular, one eye on one body of elders at one moment of danger, rather than the habitual plural "eyes of the LORD."

Deuteronomy 11:12 · Psalm 34:15 · 2 Chronicles 16:9

basis: No shared Strong's lexeme is possible: Aramaic ʻayin here is H5870, the Hebrew parallels use H5869, so the Verifier can compute no verbal basis across the language boundary. The recorded basis is the shared motif of the divine eye over a protected people, attested by Cambridge (Deut 11:12, Ps 33:18, Ps 34:15), Pulpit (Job 36:7) and Gill (2 Chr 16:9).

Building a house without a permit, and the house that is a people typological

⚙ Figural, offered as such. The unit's whole vocabulary is construction: bᵉnâʼ to build, bayith house, binyân edifice, kᵉlal to complete. Henry, commenting on vv. 3 to 17, takes that vocabulary straight into the New Testament: "However the work may seem to be hindered, yet the Lord Jesus Christ is carrying it on, his people are growing unto a holy temple in the Lord, for a habitation of God through the Spirit," which is his own compression of Ephesians 2:21 to 22. This is a cross-Testament reading and cannot be a verbal link: the Aramaic lexemes here share no Strong's number with Greek oikodomē or naos. We record it as figural, and note that the figure is old and widely held rather than novel: the apostolic writers themselves apply temple-building language to the church.

Ephesians 2:21 · 1 Corinthians 3:16

basis: Cross-Testament figural reading (Aramaic to Greek), so no shared Strong's lexeme exists and no verbal tier is possible. Basis: Henry's own application of this unit to Ephesians 2:21 to 22, plus the shared construction vocabulary (H1124 bᵉnâʼ, H1005 bayith, H1147 binyân, H3635 kᵉlal) read figurally. Widely held, not novel.

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

The work no governor stopped, and the Builder who finishes it ancient/widely-held

Henry reads this unit christologically without hesitation: "However the work may seem to be hindered, yet the Lord Jesus Christ is carrying it on, his people are growing unto a holy temple in the Lord, for a habitation of God through the Spirit." The Aramaic supports the shape of his reading better than a paraphrase shows. Tattenai asks who authorized the building and who will finish it (לְשַׁכְלָלָה, H3635 kᵉlal, Hifil, "to bring to completion"), and Pulpit records the answer the builders had already been given by Zechariah, not by Persia: "The hands of Zerubbabel have laid the foundation of this house; his hands shall also finish it" (Zechariah 4:9). ⚙ The New Testament writers take that completion language up for the church, and Henry's move from Ezra's masonry to Ephesians 2 is the ancient and widely held reading, not an invention of his own. The unit's own logic is what makes the figure fit: a building goes up under a hostile jurisdiction, without documentation, kept by an eye rather than a decree.

Ephesians 2:21 · 1 Corinthians 3:16 · Zechariah 4:9

Zerubbabel rising, and the greater glory of the second house ancient/widely-held

The man who rises in v. 2 is Zerubbabel son of Shealtiel, and Pulpit records the encouragement Haggai gave him in the same season: "the glory of this latter house shall be greater than that of the former, saith the Lord of Hosts: and in this place will I give peace" (Haggai 2:9). Cambridge and K&D both fix the moment: Haggai's first address in the second year of Darius, the resumption twenty-four days later. ⚙ Two lines converge on the house whose walls are being questioned in vv. 3 and 4. First, the promise of a greater glory for this second temple, a glory the returned exiles could not see in the stonework they were laying. Second, Zerubbabel himself, who stands in the royal line and is named in Matthew's genealogy of the Christ (Matthew 1:12 to 13). The house he loosed the work on is the house into which the Lord of that house would come. This is the apostolic pattern of reading the second temple, held widely in the church; it is not derived from any of the eleven commentators quoted in this unit, who do not make the Zerubbabel connection here, and we mark that gap honestly.

Haggai 2:9 · Matthew 1:12

The eye that did not blink, and the promise to be with us novel

⚙ Offered as a reading, with its limits stated. What guards the elders in v. 5 is not an army and not a revoked decree but a gaze: the eye of their God, singular, present through the whole interrogation while the letters travel. Benson reads the providence as active, "so overruling the hearts and hands of their enemies, that they did not hinder them by force, as they might have done," and JFB, that God "averted the threatening cloud." The pattern of protection is the same one Christ names when he sends his people into hostile jurisdictions: not exemption from the courts but presence within them, to the end of the age. We mark this as a pattern link, not a prophecy: Ezra 5:5 does not predict Matthew 28:20, and no commentator quoted here draws the line. The resemblance is real, and it is a resemblance.

Matthew 28:20

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

Text and language. This unit lies inside the Aramaic section of Ezra (4:8 to 6:18), so every lexeme is Aramaic. That has two consequences for this page. First, cross-references to Hebrew Scripture cannot be verbal links here, however close the idiom: the "eye" of 5:5 is H5870, while Deuteronomy 11:12 and Psalm 34:15 use Hebrew H5869, and the Verifier can compute no shared Strong's lexeme across that boundary. Second, the Verifier's candidate pool for this unit is dominated by the Aramaic of Ezra 4 to 6 and Daniel, and many computed bases rest on the commonest particles of the dialect (H1768 dîy appears in 186 verses, H5922 ʻal in 86, H426 ʼĕlâhh in 78). Where that is the case we have tiered the thread structural rather than verbal and said so in the badge.

What is uncertain. (1) Ezra 5:4 is a live textual crux. The received Aramaic reads אֲמַרְנָא, first person plural, "we said." Barnes reports that the Septuagint, Syriac and Arabic read "they said"; Pulpit judges the received text unsound; Cambridge calls it "practically unintelligible" but then warns that the emendation "is the easier reading, and is therefore perhaps to be suspected as a correction"; K&D defends the first person as the mark of an eyewitness. BSB follows the versions. We have left the crux open rather than deciding it. (2) אֻשַּׁרְנָא (H846) in 5:3 occurs only here and in 5:9. K&D lists the competing senses (walls, per Vulgate, Syriac and the Rabbins; building materials, per the LXX; roof, per 1 Esdras) and prefers walls; BSB renders "structure." Any English word here is a choice among live options. (3) The closing suffix of 5:1, "upon them," has no stated antecedent. Cambridge prefers the Jews, K&D attaches it to the divine name, and both admit the Aramaic is harsh. (4) Four words in this unit carry no Strong's number in the interlinear supplied to us (the pronominal suffix forms at 5:2 word 19, 5:3 words 0, 13 and 16, and 5:4 word 3); we have not glossed them as if they did.

Sources. Eleven public-domain commentators were available for this unit (Ellicott, Benson, Henry, Barnes, JFB, Gill, Geneva, Cambridge, Pulpit, K&D, Poole) and all eleven are quoted. Several of them supply history rather than exegesis: Ellicott's claim that Darius "was known secretly to favour" the Jews, and Barnes' appeal to the notoriety of the religious policy of Pseudo-Smerdis, are reconstructions the text of Ezra does not state, and we have flagged them in the relevant editorial notes. Henry's comment covers 5:3 to 17 as a block and is devotional in method; Geneva's notes here are single-line glosses. Everything marked ⚙ is this tool's own fallible synthesis and should be tested against the Word itself.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)