AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The re-dug wells: Abraham's and Isaac's labor (verbal) verbal / quotation — confirmed
Genesis 26:18 (re-digging the wells) shares the rare verb châphar (H2658, to dig,
in only 21 verses) and the noun bᵉʼêr (H875, well) with the original well-digging covenant of Genesis 21:30 and with the chapter's own coda at 26:32. The dense, low-frequency recurrence makes this the unit's strongest verbal spine — the Verifier returns these exact shared lexemes for each pairing. The link is verbal-lexical (a shared rare verb), not a quotation: no passage cites another; rather, the narrator deliberately reuses the same scarce word to bind father's and son's labor.
Genesis 26:18 · Genesis 21:30 · Genesis 26:32
basis: shared rare lexemes H2658 châphar (21 vv) + H875 bᵉʼêr (33 vv), per Verifier on 26:18↔21:30 and 26:18↔26:32 (which also shares H3327 Yitschâq, H4325 mayim); verbal-lexical, not a citation
The same king, the same seized well: Abraham's prior dispute (structural) structural / thematic — confirmed
Isaac's conflict is his father's conflict relived. Genesis 21:25 records Abraham's reproof of Abimelech over a well of water that Abimelech's servants had seized — the very pattern (stopped or seized wells, the house of Abimelech, the patriarch's servants) that Genesis 26:15–22 stages a generation later with the same royal title. The shared lexemes — bᵉʼêr (H875, well), ʼAbrâhâm (H85), ʻebed (H5650, servants) — are common rather than rare, so the Verifier rightly tiers this structural, not verbal: the bond is a repeated narrative pattern and shared cast, not a quotation. It deepens the unit's theme of contested inheritance, for the wells were Abraham's title to the land before they were Isaac's burden to reclaim.
Genesis 26:15 · Genesis 21:25 · Genesis 26:18
basis: Verifier on 26:15↔21:25: shared H875 bᵉʼêr (33 vv), H85 ʼAbrâhâm (159 vv), H5650 ʻebed (714 vv) — common lexemes + shared scene (well-seizure, house of Abimelech), hence structural not verbal
Spring up, O well: the Song of the Well (verbal) verbal / quotation — confirmed
The same rare verb-and-noun pair that spans Isaac's wells reappears in Numbers 21:18, the celebrated Song of the Well, where Israel sings of the well the princes and nobles of the people dug. Genesis 26:18 and Numbers 21:18 share châphar (H2658, in only 21 verses) and bᵉʼêr (H875). The recurrence of this scarce digging-vocabulary turns Israel's later desert song into an echo of the patriarch's patient labor — water sought and found in a dry land. It is a genuine verbal-lexical link (the shared rare verb), not a quotation: Numbers does not cite Genesis, but both reach for the same uncommon word.
Genesis 26:18 · Numbers 21:18
basis: shared rare lexeme H2658 châphar (21 vv) + H875 bᵉʼêr (33 vv), per Verifier on 26:18↔Num 21:18; verbal-lexical, not a citation
Rehoboth: a name shared across the map (verbal) verbal / quotation — confirmed
The well-name Rehoboth (rə·ḥō·ḇō·wṯ, H7344, Broad Places
) is a rare proper noun occurring in only four verses of the Hebrew Bible. Genesis 26:22 shares it with the Rehoboth of Nimrod's Assyrian cities (Genesis 10:11) and the Edomite Rehoboth-by-the-River (Genesis 36:37). The link is verbal but onomastic, not thematic — the same place-word recurs of different places; the basis is the lexeme itself, not a shared motif.
Genesis 26:22 · Genesis 10:11 · Genesis 36:37
basis: shared rare lexeme H7344 Rᵉchôbôwth (in only 4 vv), per Verifier on 26:22↔10:11; same lexeme present in 36:37 / 1 Chr 1:48
Isaac waxing great — and the rare word gâdêl (verbal) verbal / quotation — confirmed
Genesis 26:13's adjective gâdêl (H1432, growing/great,
in only 4 verses) recurs in Ezekiel 16:26, where Israel's great
Egyptian neighbors are named in a chapter of rebuke. The shared lexeme is verbal and rare, but the contexts diverge sharply (blessing vs. judgment) — the connection is lexical, and should not be over-read as thematic kinship.
Genesis 26:13 · Ezekiel 16:26
basis: shared rare lexeme H1432 gâdêl (in only 4 vv), per Verifier on 26:13↔Ezek 16:26; same word also at 2 Chr 17:12, 1 Sam 2:26
The renewed promise: I am with you, fear not, multiply your seed (structural) structural / thematic — confirmed
The Beersheba oracle (Genesis 26:24) reprises the chapter's own opening promise (Genesis 26:3 — blessing, seed, Abraham) and the Fear not
first spoken to Abraham (Genesis 15:1, sharing yârêʼ and the emphatic ’ānōḵî). Barnes makes the cross-reference explicit. The shared lexemes are common covenant vocabulary, so the link is structural/thematic, not a quotation claim.
Genesis 26:24 · Genesis 26:3 · Genesis 15:1
basis: Verifier: 26:24↔26:3 share H85 ʼAbrâhâm, H2233 zeraʻ, H1288 bârak; 26:24↔15:1 share H3372 yârêʼ, H595 ʼānōḵî, H7235 râbâh — all common, hence structural not verbal
Be fruitful in the land: Rehoboth and the creation mandate (structural) structural / thematic — confirmed
Isaac's hope at Rehoboth — we shall be fruitful
(pârâh, H6509) — uses the same verb as the creation blessing of Genesis 1:22 (be fruitful and multiply
) and the patriarchal promise. The shared lexeme grounds a thematic continuity from Eden's mandate to the patriarch's well, but pârâh is too widely used (28 vv) and the claim too motif-level to call verbal.
Genesis 26:22 · Genesis 1:22
basis: shared lexeme H6509 pârâh (in 28 vv), per Verifier on 26:22↔1:22 — thematic continuity (creation/covenant fruitfulness), not a quotation
Altar, tent, and the call on the name (structural) structural / thematic — confirmed
Isaac's worship at Beersheba (Genesis 26:25) mirrors his father's pattern at Bethel (Genesis 12:8): build an altar (H4196), pitch a tent (nâṭâh ’ōhel, H5186 + H168), and call on the name of the LORD
(qârâʼ bᵉšêm, H7121 + H8034). The cluster of shared lexemes marks a deliberate patriarchal type-scene; the words are common, so the link is structural.
Genesis 26:25 · Genesis 12:8 · Genesis 4:26
basis: Verifier: 26:25↔12:8 share H5186 nâṭâh, H168 ʼôhel, H4196 mizbêach, H1129 bânâh, H7121 qârâʼ — a shared worship type-scene; Barnes cites Gen 4:26 for 'calling on the name'
The hundredfold harvest and the sower's good ground (cross-Testament, flagged) flagged — verify source
The patriarchal commentators (Ellicott, Benson, Poole, Gill, the Pulpit Commentary) uniformly read Genesis 26:12's hundredfold
alongside the hundredfold of the Parable of the Sower (Matthew 13:8, 23). The connection is genuine and ancient in the commentary tradition, but it is cross-Testament: a Hebrew narrative and a Greek parable cannot share a Strong's number. The Verifier confirms no shared original-language lexeme exists. We therefore flag it: the link is interpretive, argued from the shared image of extraordinary yield, not from verbal identity.
Genesis 26:12 · Matthew 13:8
basis: Verifier: no shared lexeme (Hebrew↔Greek — cannot share Strong's). Link is thematic/interpretive (hundredfold yield), asserted by Ellicott/Benson/Poole et al., not verbal