Then the LORD said to Moses and Aaron,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
Yah·weh way·ḏab·bêr ’el- mō·šeh wə·’el- ’a·hă·rōn lê·mōr
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
Laws about Skin Diseases
Leviticus 13:1–46 — Laws about Skin Diseases. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
Then the LORD said to Moses and Aaron,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
Yah·weh way·ḏab·bêr ’el- mō·šeh wə·’el- ’a·hă·rōn lê·mōr
“When someone has a swelling or rash or bright spot on his skin that may be an infectious skin disease, he must be brought to Aaron the priest or to one of his sons who is a priest.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
kî- ’ā·ḏām yih·yeh śə·’êṯ ’ōw- sap·pa·ḥaṯ ’ōw ḇa·he·reṯ ḇə·‘ō·wr- bə·śā·rōw wə·hā·yāh ṣā·rā·‘aṯ ḇə·‘ō·wr- bə·śā·rōw lə·ne·ḡa‘ wə·hū·ḇā ’el- ’a·hă·rōn hak·kō·hên ’ōw ’el- ’a·ḥaḏ mib·bā·nāw hak·kō·hă·nîm
The priest is to examine the infection on his skin, and if the hair in the infection has turned white and the sore appears to be deeper than the skin, it is a skin disease. After the priest examines him, he must pronounce him unclean.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hak·kō·hên ’eṯ- wə·rā·’āh han·ne·ḡa‘ bə·‘ō·wr- hab·bā·śār wə·śê·‘ār ban·ne·ḡa‘ hā·p̄aḵ lā·ḇān han·ne·ḡa‘ ū·mar·’êh ‘ā·mōq mê·‘ō·wr bə·śā·rōw ne·ḡa‘ hū ṣā·ra·‘aṯ hak·kō·hên wə·rā·’ā·hū wə·ṭim·mê ’ō·ṯōw
If, however, the spot on his skin is white and does not appear to be deeper than the skin, and the hair in it has not turned white, the priest shall isolate the infected person for seven days.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’im- ba·he·reṯ bə·‘ō·wr bə·śā·rōw lə·ḇā·nāh hî ’ên- mar·’e·hā wə·‘ā·mōq min- hā·‘ō·wr ū·śə·‘ā·rāh lō- hā·p̄aḵ lā·ḇān hak·kō·hên ’eṯ- wə·his·gîr han·ne·ḡa‘ šiḇ·‘aṯ yā·mîm
On the seventh day the priest is to reexamine him, and if he sees that the infection is unchanged and has not spread on the skin, the priest must isolate him for another seven days.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
haš·šə·ḇî·‘î bay·yō·wm hak·kō·hên wə·rā·’ā·hū wə·hin·nêh bə·‘ê·nāw han·ne·ḡa‘ ‘ā·maḏ lō- p̄ā·śāh han·ne·ḡa‘ bā·‘ō·wr hak·kō·hên wə·his·gî·rōw šê·nîṯ šiḇ·‘aṯ yā·mîm
The priest will examine him again on the seventh day, and if the sore has faded and has not spread on the skin, the priest shall pronounce him clean; it is a rash. The person must wash his clothes and be clean.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hak·kō·hên ’ō·ṯōw wə·rā·’āh šê·nîṯ haš·šə·ḇî·‘î bay·yō·wm wə·hin·nêh han·ne·ḡa‘ kê·hāh wə·lō- p̄ā·śāh han·ne·ḡa‘ bā·‘ō·wr hak·kō·hên wə·ṭi·hă·rōw hî mis·pa·ḥaṯ wə·ḵib·bes bə·ḡā·ḏāw wə·ṭā·hêr
But if the rash spreads further on his skin after he has shown himself to the priest for his cleansing, he must present himself again to the priest.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’im- ham·mis·pa·ḥaṯ pā·śōh ṯip̄·śeh bā·‘ō·wr ’a·ḥă·rê hê·rā·’ō·ṯōw ’el- hak·kō·hên lə·ṭā·ho·rā·ṯōw wə·nir·’āh šê·nîṯ ’el- hak·kō·hên
The priest will reexamine him, and if the rash has spread on the skin, the priest must pronounce him unclean; it is a skin disease.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hak·kō·hên wə·rā·’āh wə·hin·nêh ham·mis·pa·ḥaṯ pā·śə·ṯāh bā·‘ō·wr hak·kō·hên wə·ṭim·mə·’ōw hî ṣā·ra·‘aṯ
When anyone develops a skin disease, he must be brought to the priest.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
kî bə·’ā·ḏām ṯih·yeh ne·ḡa‘ ṣā·ra·‘aṯ wə·hū·ḇā ’el- hak·kō·hên
The priest will examine him, and if there is a white swelling on the skin that has turned the hair white, and there is raw flesh in the swelling,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hak·kō·hên wə·rā·’āh wə·hin·nêh lə·ḇā·nāh śə·’êṯ- bā·‘ō·wr wə·hî hā·p̄ə·ḵāh śê·‘ār lā·ḇān ū·miḥ·yaṯ ḥay bā·śār baś·’êṯ
it is a chronic skin disease and the priest must pronounce him unclean. He need not isolate him, for he is unclean.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hî nō·wō·še·neṯ ṣā·ra·‘aṯ bə·‘ō·wr bə·śā·rōw hak·kō·hên wə·ṭim·mə·’ōw lō yas·gi·ren·nū kî hū ṭā·mê
But if the skin disease breaks out all over his skin so that it covers all the skin of the infected person from head to foot, as far as the priest can see,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’im- haṣ·ṣā·ra·‘aṯ pā·rō·w·aḥ tip̄·raḥ bā·‘ō·wr haṣ·ṣā·ra·‘aṯ ’êṯ wə·ḵis·sə·ṯāh kāl- ‘ō·wr han·ne·ḡa‘ mê·rō·šōw wə·‘aḏ- raḡ·lāw lə·ḵāl hak·kō·hên mar·’êh ‘ê·nê
the priest shall examine him, and if the disease has covered his entire body, he is to pronounce the infected person clean. Since it has all turned white, he is clean.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hak·kō·hên wə·rā·’āh wə·hin·nêh haṣ·ṣā·ra·‘aṯ ’eṯ- ḵis·sə·ṯāh kāl- bə·śā·rōw han·nā·ḡa‘ wə·ṭi·har ’eṯ- hā·p̄aḵ kul·lōw lā·ḇān hū ṭā·hō·wr
But whenever raw flesh appears on someone, he will be unclean.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
ū·ḇə·yō·wm ḥay bā·śār hê·rā·’ō·wṯ bōw yiṭ·mā
When the priest sees the raw flesh, he must pronounce him unclean. The raw flesh is unclean; it is a skin disease.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hak·kō·hên ’eṯ- wə·rā·’āh ha·ḥay hab·bā·śār wə·ṭim·mə·’ōw ha·ḥay hab·bā·śār ṭā·mê hū ṣā·ra·‘aṯ hū
But if the raw flesh changes and turns white, he must go to the priest.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
’ōw ḵî ha·ḥay hab·bā·śār yā·šūḇ wə·neh·paḵ lə·lā·ḇān ū·ḇā ’el- hak·kō·hên
The priest will reexamine him, and if the infection has turned white, the priest is to pronounce the infected person clean; then he is clean.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hak·kō·hên wə·rā·’ā·hū wə·hin·nêh han·ne·ḡa‘ neh·paḵ lə·lā·ḇān hak·kō·hên ’eṯ- han·ne·ḡa‘ wə·ṭi·har hū ṭā·hō·wr
When a boil appears on someone’s skin and it heals,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
kî- šə·ḥîn yih·yeh ḇōw- ḇə·‘ō·rōw ū·ḇā·śār wə·nir·pā
and a white swelling or a reddish-white spot develops where the boil was, he must present himself to the priest.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
lə·ḇā·nāh śə·’êṯ ’ōw lə·ḇā·nāh ’ă·ḏam·dā·meṯ ḇa·he·reṯ wə·hā·yāh bim·qō·wm haš·šə·ḥîn wə·nir·’āh ’el- hak·kō·hên
The priest shall examine it, and if it appears to be beneath the skin and the hair in it has turned white, the priest shall pronounce him unclean; it is a diseased infection that has broken out in the boil.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hak·kō·hên wə·rā·’āh wə·hin·nêh mar·’e·hā šā·p̄āl min- hā·‘ō·wr ū·śə·‘ā·rāh hā·p̄aḵ lā·ḇān hak·kō·hên ne·ḡa‘- wə·ṭim·mə·’ōw hî ṣā·ra·‘aṯ pā·rā·ḥāh baš·šə·ḥîn
But when the priest examines it, if there is no white hair in it, and it is not beneath the skin and has faded, the priest shall isolate him for seven days.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’im hak·kō·hên yir·’en·nāh wə·hin·nêh ’ên- lā·ḇān śê·‘ār bāh ’ê·nen·nāh min- ū·šə·p̄ā·lāh hā·‘ō·wr wə·hî ḵê·hāh hak·kō·hên wə·his·gî·rōw šiḇ·‘aṯ yā·mîm
If it spreads any further on the skin, the priest must pronounce him unclean; it is an infection.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’im- pā·śōh ṯip̄·śeh bā·‘ō·wr hak·kō·hên ’ō·ṯōw wə·ṭim·mê hî ne·ḡa‘
But if the spot remains unchanged and does not spread, it is only the scar from the boil, and the priest shall pronounce him clean.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’im- hab·ba·he·reṯ ta·‘ă·mōḏ taḥ·te·hā lō p̄ā·śā·ṯāh hî ṣā·re·ḇeṯ haš·šə·ḥîn hak·kō·hên wə·ṭi·hă·rōw
When there is a burn on someone’s skin and the raw area of the burn becomes reddish-white or white,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
kî- yih·yeh miḵ·waṯ- ’êš ḇə·‘ō·rōw ’ōw ḇā·śār miḥ·yaṯ ham·miḵ·wāh ba·he·reṯ wə·hā·yə·ṯāh lə·ḇā·nāh ’ă·ḏam·de·meṯ ’ōw lə·ḇā·nāh
the priest must examine it. If the hair in the spot has turned white and the spot appears to be deeper than the skin, it is a disease that has broken out in the burn. The priest must pronounce him unclean; it is a diseased infection.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hak·kō·hên wə·rā·’āh ’ō·ṯāh wə·hin·nêh śê·‘ār bab·ba·he·reṯ neh·paḵ lā·ḇān ū·mar·’e·hā ‘ā·mōq min- hā·‘ō·wr hî ṣā·ra·‘aṯ pā·rā·ḥāh bam·miḵ·wāh hak·kō·hên ne·ḡa‘ wə·ṭim·mê ’ō·ṯōw hî ṣā·ra·‘aṯ
But if the priest examines it and there is no white hair in the spot, and it is not beneath the skin but has faded, the priest shall isolate him for seven days.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’im hak·kō·hên yir·’en·nāh wə·hin·nêh ’ên- lā·ḇān śê·‘ār bab·be·he·reṯ ’ê·nen·nāh min- ū·šə·p̄ā·lāh hā·‘ō·wr wə·hi·w ḵê·hāh hak·kō·hên wə·his·gî·rōw šiḇ·‘aṯ yā·mîm
On the seventh day the priest is to reexamine him, and if it has spread further on the skin, the priest must pronounce him unclean; it is a diseased infection.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
haš·šə·ḇî·‘î bay·yō·wm hak·kō·hên wə·rā·’ā·hū ’im- pā·śōh ṯip̄·śeh bā·‘ō·wr hak·kō·hên ’ō·ṯōw ne·ḡa‘ wə·ṭim·mê hî ṣā·ra·‘aṯ
But if the spot is unchanged and has not spread on the skin but has faded, it is a swelling from the burn, and the priest is to pronounce him clean; for it is only the scar from the burn.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’im- hab·ba·he·reṯ ṯa·‘ă·mōḏ taḥ·te·hā lō- p̄ā·śə·ṯāh ḇā·‘ō·wr ḵê·hāh wə·hi·w śə·’êṯ ham·miḵ·wāh hak·kō·hên wə·ṭi·hă·rōw kî- hî ṣā·re·ḇeṯ ham·miḵ·wāh hî
If a man or woman has an infection on the head or chin,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
kî- wə·’îš ’ōw ’iš·šāh yih·yeh ḇōw nā·ḡa‘ bə·rōš ’ōw ḇə·zā·qān
the priest shall examine the infection, and if it appears to be deeper than the skin and the hair in it is yellow and thin, the priest must pronounce him unclean; it is a scaly outbreak, an infectious disease of the head or chin.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hak·kō·hên ’eṯ- wə·rā·’āh han·ne·ḡa‘ wə·hin·nêh mar·’ê·hū ‘ā·mōq min- hā·‘ō·wr ū·ḇōw śê·‘ār ṣā·hōḇ dāq hak·kō·hên wə·ṭim·mê ’ō·ṯōw hū ne·ṯeq ṣā·ra·‘aṯ hā·rōš ’ōw haz·zā·qān hū
But if the priest examines the scaly infection and it does not appear to be deeper than the skin, and there is no black hair in it, the priest shall isolate the infected person for seven days.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·ḵî- hak·kō·hên ’eṯ- yir·’eh han·ne·ṯeq ne·ḡa‘ wə·hin·nêh ’ên- mar·’ê·hū ‘ā·mōq min- hā·‘ō·wr ’ên šā·ḥōr wə·śê·‘ār bōw hak·kō·hên ’eṯ- wə·his·gîr han·ne·ṯeq ne·ḡa‘ šiḇ·‘aṯ yā·mîm
On the seventh day the priest is to reexamine the infection, and if the scaly outbreak has not spread and there is no yellow hair in it, and it does not appear to be deeper than the skin,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
haš·šə·ḇî·‘î bay·yō·wm hak·kō·hên ’eṯ- wə·rā·’āh han·ne·ḡa‘ wə·hin·nêh han·ne·ṯeq lō- p̄ā·śāh hā·yāh wə·lō- ṣā·hōḇ śê·‘ār ḇōw han·ne·ṯeq ’ên ū·mar·’êh ‘ā·mōq min- hā·‘ō·wr
then the person must shave himself except for the scaly area. Then the priest shall isolate him for another seven days.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·hiṯ·gal·lāḥ wə·’eṯ- lō yə·ḡal·lê·aḥ han·ne·ṯeq hak·kō·hên ’eṯ- wə·his·gîr han·ne·ṯeq šê·nîṯ šiḇ·‘aṯ yā·mîm
On the seventh day the priest shall examine the scaly outbreak, and if it has not spread on the skin and does not appear to be deeper than the skin, the priest is to pronounce him clean. He must wash his clothes, and he will be clean.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
haš·šə·ḇî·‘î bay·yō·wm hak·kō·hên ’eṯ- wə·rā·’āh han·ne·ṯeq wə·hin·nêh han·ne·ṯeq lō- p̄ā·śāh bā·‘ō·wr ’ê·nen·nū ū·mar·’ê·hū ‘ā·mōq min- hā·‘ō·wr hak·kō·hên wə·ṭi·har ’ō·ṯōw wə·ḵib·bes bə·ḡā·ḏāw wə·ṭā·hêr
If, however, the scaly outbreak spreads further on the skin after his cleansing,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’im- han·ne·ṯeq pā·śōh yip̄·śeh bā·‘ō·wr ’a·ḥă·rê ṭā·ho·rā·ṯōw
the priest is to examine him, and if the scaly outbreak has spread on the skin, the priest need not look for yellow hair; the person is unclean.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hak·kō·hên wə·rā·’ā·hū wə·hin·nêh han·ne·ṯeq pā·śāh bā·‘ō·wr hak·kō·hên lō- yə·ḇaq·qêr haṣ·ṣā·hōḇ laś·śê·‘ār hū ṭā·mê
If, however, in his sight the scaly outbreak is unchanged and black hair has grown in it, then it has healed. He is clean, and the priest is to pronounce him clean.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’im- bə·‘ê·nāw han·ne·ṯeq ‘ā·maḏ šā·ḥōr wə·śê·‘ār ṣā·maḥ- bōw han·ne·ṯeq nir·pā hū ṭā·hō·wr hak·kō·hên wə·ṭi·hă·rōw
When a man or a woman has white spots on the skin,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
kî- yih·yeh wə·’îš ’ōw- ’iš·šāh lə·ḇā·nōṯ be·hā·rōṯ be·hā·rōṯ ḇə·‘ō·wr- bə·śā·rām
the priest shall examine them, and if the spots are dull white, it is a harmless rash that has broken out on the skin; the person is clean.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hak·kō·hên wə·rā·’āh wə·hin·nêh be·hā·rōṯ ḇə·‘ō·wr- bə·śā·rām kê·hō·wṯ lə·ḇā·nōṯ hū bō·haq pā·raḥ bā·‘ō·wr hū ṭā·hō·wr
Now if a man loses his hair and is bald, he is still clean.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
kî wə·’îš yim·mā·rêṭ rō·šōw hū qê·rê·aḥ hū ṭā·hō·wr
Or if his hairline recedes and he is bald on his forehead, he is still clean.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·’im rō·šōw mip·pə·’aṯ pā·nāw yim·mā·rêṭ hū gib·bê·aḥ hū ṭā·hō·wr
But if there is a reddish-white sore on the bald head or forehead, it is an infectious disease breaking out on it.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
wə·ḵî- yih·yeh lā·ḇān ’ă·ḏam·dām ne·ḡa‘ ḇaq·qā·ra·ḥaṯ ’ōw ḇag·gab·ba·ḥaṯ hî ṣā·ra·‘aṯ pō·ra·ḥaṯ bə·qā·raḥ·tōw ’ōw ḇə·ḡab·baḥ·tōw
The priest is to examine him, and if the swelling of the infection on his bald head or forehead is reddish-white like a skin disease,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
hak·kō·hên wə·rā·’āh ’ō·ṯōw wə·hin·nêh śə·’êṯ- han·ne·ḡa‘ bə·qā·raḥ·tōw ’ōw ḇə·ḡab·baḥ·tōw lə·ḇā·nāh ’ă·ḏam·de·meṯ kə·mar·’êh ‘ō·wr ṣā·ra·‘aṯ bā·śār
the man is diseased; he is unclean. The priest must pronounce him unclean because of the infection on his head.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
’îš- ṣā·rū·a‘ hū ṭā·mê hū hak·kō·hên ṭam·mê yə·ṭam·mə·’en·nū niḡ·‘ōw bə·rō·šōw
A diseased person must wear torn clothes and let his hair hang loose, and he must cover his mouth and cry out, ‘Unclean, unclean!’
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
han·ne·ḡa‘ wə·haṣ·ṣā·rū·a‘ ’ă·šer- bōw bə·ḡā·ḏāw yih·yū p̄ə·ru·mîm wə·rō·šōw yih·yeh p̄ā·rū·a‘ wə·‘al- ya‘·ṭeh śā·p̄ām yiq·rā wə·ṭā·mê ṭā·mê
As long as he has the infection, he remains unclean. He must live alone in a place outside the camp.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Hebrew — tap a word ↓
kāl- yə·mê ’ă·šer han·ne·ḡa‘ yiṭ·mā bōw hū bā·ḏāḏ ṭā·mê yê·šêḇ mō·wō·šā·ḇōw mi·ḥūṣ lam·ma·ḥă·neh
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
The chapter opens with God speaking not to Moses alone but “to Moses and to Aaron” (v. 1) — and the doubled address is the whole key. As Joseph Benson says, “This law is directed to Aaron as well as Moses, because he and his sons were to be judges, to determine… what was clean and what unclean.” The man with a suspicious mark must “be brought” (wə·hū·ḇā, passive) — and brought, Matthew Poole insists, “not to the physician… it needed not so much healing as cleansing, and was rather a ceremonial pollution than a disease.” The Hebrew names the affliction negaʻ — “lit. ‘a stroke’… the leper was rejected as ‘smitten of God’” (Cambridge Bible). From the first word, then, this is not a clinic but a courtroom of holiness: the priest, at the sanctuary, will read a body for its standing before God.
Six times the priest “pronounces” clean or unclean, and the Hebrew verb is a declarative Piel — wə·ṭim·mē, literally “make him unclean” (v. 3). Charles Ellicott states the grammar exactly: “a man is said to do that which in his official capacity he pronounces as done.” Matthew Poole presses it to its theological edge: the priest acts “ministerially and declaratively, in which sense ministers are said to remit sins, Matthew 16:19.” And at v. 37 Poole draws the unflinching conclusion: “The truth of the thing, and not the sentence of the priest, made him clean; and if the priest had partially pronounced one clean who was not clean, his sentence had been null.” The priest reads reality; he does not manufacture it. This is the chapter’s deep theology of the Word and the keys — and the seed of a thoroughly Reformation reading.
Then comes the strangest law in the chapter: a man with a single white spot is unclean, but a man covered head to foot in white — “blooming” like a tree in flower, pā·rô·aḥ tip̄·raḥ (John Gill: “the man that has it on him looks like a plant or tree covered with white flowers”) — is pronounced clean (vv. 12–13). Joseph Benson feels the difficulty: “It may seem strange that a man who is all over leprous should be pronounced clean, and yet one who is but partially leprous should be unclean.” Jamieson, Fausset & Brown give the medical sense — the disease “ran through its course and exhausted itself.” But Gill reaches for the gospel: the man who “sees himself to be a sinful creature, all over covered with sin, and… disclaims all righteousness of his own… becomes clean through the grace of God and the… righteousness of Christ.” The proud spot is condemned; the man wholly white — wholly owning his ruin — is cleansed. And the moment a patch of “living flesh” breaks through (v. 14), the self-flattering sign of vitality, he is unclean again.
Across spot, swelling, boil, burn, scall, and bald head, the law runs one invariable test: does the mark spread? The verb pāśāh “occurs only in chs. 13, 14” (Cambridge), and on it everything turns — what stands still is cleared, what moves is condemned (vv. 5–8, 22–23, 27–28, 35–37). The procedure is unhurried by design: seven days, then seven more, “to teach ministers not to be hasty in their judgments” (Benson, v. 4). And the chapter is careful to under-condemn as well as to convict: ordinary baldness is clean (vv. 40–41) — though baldness was “regarded as a disgrace, and… a Divine punishment” (Ellicott) — and the dull-white bōhaq is “a skin disease which is not of a leprous character” (Cambridge, v. 39), dismissed without quarantine. The law that knows how to exclude also knows how to set free.
The diagnostic section ends, and the sentence falls. The leper must rend his clothes, dishevel his hair, cover his lip, and cry “Unclean! Unclean!” (v. 45) — and the Hebrew loads every gesture with meaning. The rare verb pāram (“rent”) is the very thing the high priest was forbidden to do (Lev 10:6); the covered lip is Ezekiel’s and Micah’s sign of mourning and shame; the doubled cry is Lamentations’ word over fallen Zion. Albert Barnes gathers it: “The leper was a living parable in the world of the sin of which death was the wages… he bore about with him at once the deadly fruit and the symbol of the sin of his race.” He must dwell “alone… outside the camp” (v. 46) — bā·ḏāḏ, the word for desolate Jerusalem, outside the place where God dwells. The Pulpit Commentary reads the point: the exclusion was “typically and mystically to teach that the fate brought upon a man by unremoved sin is separation from the people of God here and hereafter.” The chapter diagnoses; it cannot cure. It ends in exile — and so it leans, unfinished, toward the One who could touch such a man.
Read under Sola Scriptura — and offered as a fallible reading to be tested, not a verdict to be trusted — three things stand out. First, the priest declares; he does not create. The chapter’s relentless verb is the declarative Piel: the priest “makes unclean” only by pronouncing what the flesh already is (v. 3; Ellicott, Poole). Poole’s verdict at v. 37 — “The truth of the thing, and not the sentence of the priest, made him clean” — guards against every fantasy of a human word that manufactures a divine reality. The leprosy law is, in this sense, an argument against sacerdotal magic: God’s appointed minister announces God’s reality; he does not coin it. Second, the law is a diagnosis without a cure. Chapter 13 can name the plague, time the waiting, and pronounce the verdict — but it cannot heal. It ends in exile (v. 46), and the patient is left waiting for a cleansing that the next chapter can only ratify, never cause. As the commentators say with one voice, “The priest could only convict the leper… but Christ can cure the sinner” (Henry). The Word that condemns sin truly cannot, of itself, remove it — which is precisely why the whole chapter leans forward toward grace. Third, the strange clean-when-wholly-white law (vv. 12–13) reads as the gospel’s logic in ceremony: the man who owns himself wholly unclean, claiming no patch of healthy flesh of his own, is the one declared clean. The half-righteous spot is rejected; the wholly-ruined, wholly-confessed man is received. That is the publican going home justified (Luke 18:13–14) — but the connection is offered as this tool’s reading, to be weighed against the text, not asserted as its plain sense.
The law can name the leprosy and read the verdict; it cannot wash the leper. It ends outside the camp — and waits there for the One who would go outside the gate.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The chapter’s sharpest internal tension binds these two verses by the very same words. In v. 3 the hair “turned white” (hāp̄aḵ lā·ḇān) on a single spot condemns; in v. 13 the body “all turned white” (kul·lô hāp̄aḵ lā·ḇān) acquits. Benson names the difficulty; Gill reads its gospel sense — the sinner wholly owning his defilement is the one made clean. The link is verbal: the Verifier records the shared lexemes hāp̄aḵ (H2015), lā·ḇān (H3836), tsâraʻath (H6883, in only 33 verses), and negaʻ (H5061) running between the two verses.
Leviticus 13:3 · Leviticus 13:13
basis: shared Strong's lexemes between the two Hebrew verses: H6883 tsâraʻath (rare — only 33 vv) + H2015 hâphak + H3836 lâbân + H5061 negaʻ; the relatively rare tsâraʻath secures the verbal tier
The leper is commanded to do exactly what the priest is forbidden to do. The rare verb pāram (“rend,” appearing in only three verses) and pāraʻ (“let the hair loose / dishevel”) are used in v. 45 of the leper — and in Leviticus 10:6 and 21:10 of the prohibition laid on Aaron and his sons, who must not tear their garments or unbind their hair in mourning. Cambridge Bible flags the link directly: “not the usual Heb. word, but one used only here and in Leviticus 10:6, Leviticus 21:10.” The leper bears the very mourning the priest is spared — a sharp foreshadow of the Priest who would take the mourner’s place.
Leviticus 13:45 · Leviticus 10:6 · Leviticus 21:10
basis: rare shared lexemes H6533 pâram (only 3 vv) + H6544 pâraʻ (15 vv) link Lev 13:45 to Lev 10:6 (Verifier: also shares H899 beged, H7218 rôʼsh); the low frequency of pâram secures the verbal tier
The command to “cover the upper lip” (‘al-śā·p̄ām ya‘·ṭeh) reaches across the canon by a genuinely rare word: śā·p̄ām (“moustache / upper lip”) occurs in only five verses. Ellicott and the Pulpit Commentary point to its two great echoes — Ezekiel, told to cover his lip as a sign of mourning forbidden tears (Ezekiel 24:17), and Micah’s false prophets who shall cover their lip in shame (Micah 3:7). The same lip-covering that marks the leper as a mourner marks the prophet’s grief and the deceiver’s disgrace.
Leviticus 13:45 · Ezekiel 24:17 · Micah 3:7
basis: rare shared lexemes H8222 sâphâm (upper lip — only 5 vv) + H5844 ʻâṭâh (cover — 15 vv) between Lev 13:45 and both Ezekiel 24:17 and Micah 3:7; the very low frequency of sâphâm secures the verbal tier
The leper must cry “Unclean, unclean!” (ṭā·mē ṭā·mē yiq·rā) — and Lamentations turns the same cry against Jerusalem in ruins: “‘Go away! Unclean!’ men shouted at them” (Lamentations 4:15, BSB). Benson and Cambridge both name the allusion. The city that defiled herself becomes, in her fall, a leper among the nations — shunned with the very word her own law put in the leper’s mouth. The basis is structural, not a quotation: the two Hebrew verses share ṭâmêʼ (“unclean”) and qârâʼ (“cry / call”), but these are common words and there is no claim that Lamentations is quoting the statute.
Leviticus 13:45 · Lamentations 4:15
basis: shared Hebrew lexemes H2931 ṭâmêʼ (78 vv) + H7121 qârâʼ (687 vv) between the two verses — both common words, so a shared-motif (the leper's cry turned on Zion) rather than a quotation; tiered structural, not verbal
The leper “shall dwell alone… outside the camp” (v. 46), and the paradigm case stands behind it: Miriam, struck leprous, was “shut out of the camp seven days” (Numbers 12:14) — John Gill names her directly. Numbers 5:2 makes the rule general: the leper, with others defiled, is put “outside the camp,” away from the dwelling of God in Israel’s midst. The link is structural: the Verifier records the shared words ḥûṣ (“outside”) and maḥăneh (“camp”) between v. 46 and both Numbers texts — the same exclusion-language, the same sentence of separation.
Leviticus 13:46 · Numbers 12:14 · Numbers 5:2
basis: shared Hebrew lexemes H2351 chûwts (outside) + H4264 machăneh (camp) between Lev 13:46 and Numbers 12:14 / Numbers 5:2 (Verifier: Num 5:2 also shares H2931 ṭâmêʼ); shared exclusion-formula, not a quotation — tiered structural
The leper's sentence ends on one stark word: bā·ḏāḏ yē·šēḇ, “alone he shall dwell” (v. 46) — Albert Barnes: “More properly, dwell apart; that is, separated from the people.” Lamentations opens its dirge with the very same rare word over the ruined city: “How lonely lies the city, once so full of people!” (Lamentations 1:1, BSB). The fallen capital has become what the law made of the leper — a thing set apart, dwelling in enforced solitude. The link is genuinely verbal: the Verifier records bâdâd (H910, “alone / apart,” in only 11 verses) and the verb yâshab (“sit / dwell”) shared between the two; the rarity of bâdâd carries the tie, though there is no claim that Lamentations is consciously quoting the statute.
Leviticus 13:46 · Lamentations 1:1
basis: rare shared lexeme H910 bâdâd (alone / apart — only 11 vv) + H3427 yâshab (dwell) between Lev 13:46 and Lamentations 1:1 (Verifier-confirmed); the low frequency of bâdâd secures the verbal tier — though it marks a shared rare word, not a conscious citation
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
The entire chapter rests on a limit: the priest can diagnose leprosy but never heal it. Matthew Henry states the type plainly: “The priest could only convict the leper, (by the law is the knowledge of sin,) but Christ can cure the sinner, he can take away sin.” Matthew Poole notes that the disease “needed not so much healing as cleansing,” and the Hebrew bears it out — Scripture says Christ “cleanses” lepers, not merely cures them. Leviticus 13 is the law doing its proper work, Romans 3:20 in ceremony: it names the plague and pronounces the verdict, and then waits for a greater Priest who heals what He diagnoses. This typology is woven through the whole Reformation commentary tradition cited above.
Leviticus 13:3 · Leviticus 13:8 · Romans 3:20 · Matthew 8:2-3
The chapter makes the leper radioactive — his very entrance defiles a house, and he must cry his own uncleanness to warn off the clean. Yet the Pulpit Commentary already notices that “the priest is not made unclean by his contact with the leper, because he is in the performance of his duty” (v. 2) — a hint the Gospels bring to its astonishing fulfillment. When a leper begs, “If You are willing, You can make me clean,” Jesus, “moved with compassion,” reaches out His hand and touches the man (Mark 1:40–41) — and the flow runs backward: instead of the leper defiling Christ, Christ cleanses the leper (“immediately the leprosy left him, and the man was cleansed,” v. 42). And He sends the cleansed man to do exactly what Leviticus 13–14 requires: “go, show yourself to the priest and present the offering Moses prescribed for your cleansing, as a testimony to them” (Mark 1:44, BSB). The law that quarantined the leper is honored by the One who undoes the quarantine. Held honestly: this is a cross-Testament link of fulfillment and reversal, argued from the shape of the texts — Mark is in Greek and Leviticus in Hebrew, so there is no shared Strong's lexeme to cite; it is typological, not verbal.
Leviticus 13:45-46 · Mark 1:40-44 · Matthew 8:2-3 · Luke 17:12-14
The chapter’s last word is exile: the leper “shall dwell alone… outside the camp” (v. 46), in the place of the cast-out and the dead. Hebrews takes that exact geography and lays it over the cross: the sacrificial “bodies are burned outside the camp. And so Jesus also suffered outside the city gate, to sanctify the people by His own blood” (Hebrews 13:11–12, BSB) — and then the summons, “let us go to Him outside the camp, bearing the disgrace He bore” (v. 13). The leper’s place of uttermost separation became the Lord’s chosen place — He went out to where the unclean were sent, so that the unclean might be brought back in. Held honestly: the connection is typological and structural (the shared motif of “outside the camp / gate” and bearing defilement), argued across Testaments; it does not rest on a shared original-language word, since Hebrews is Greek and Leviticus Hebrew. Offered to be weighed, not asserted as the verse’s plain sense.
Leviticus 13:46 · Hebrews 13:11-13 · Numbers 12:14
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). The named voices are quoted verbatim from public-domain commentaries — Ellicott, Benson, Matthew Henry (Concise), Barnes, Jamieson-Fausset-Brown, Poole, Gill, the Geneva Study Bible notes, the Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, the Pulpit Commentary, and Keil & Delitzsch — each attributed in place with its source URL. Where a commentator wrote one note across a range of verses (e.g. Henry on 13:1–17, 13:18–44, 13:45–46; JFB on 13:9–37), the excerpt is drawn verbatim from that block and an editorial note marks that the comment governs the wider passage. The Hebrew analysis — transliteration, parsing, the literal renderings built up from the original, and the "where the English smooths the Hebrew" notes — is this tool's own work (⚙): careful but fallible; verify against a lexicon (BDB, HALOT) and a standard grammar.
On the threads. Every cross-reference badge records a basis computed by the Verifier from shared original-language lexemes. The intra-Hebrew links (13:3↔13:13; 13:45↔Lev 10:6/21:10; 13:45↔Ezekiel 24:17/Micah 3:7; 13:45↔Lamentations 4:15; 13:46↔Numbers 12:14/5:2; 13:46↔Lamentations 1:1) are tiered verbal only where a genuinely rare shared word carries the weight — pāram (3 verses), śāphām (5 verses), bâdâd (11 verses), tsâraʻath (33 verses) — and structural where the shared words are common (ṭâmêʼ, qârâʼ, ḥûṣ, maḥăneh), so the connection is a shared motif rather than a quotation. Even where a rare lexeme secures the verbal tier, it records a shared word, not a proven conscious citation; Lamentations need not be quoting the leprosy statute for its dirge to draw on the same vocabulary of exclusion. On Christ. The New-Testament links (Mark 1, Hebrews 13) are cross-Testament: Greek cannot share a Hebrew Strong's number, so they are tiered typological and argued from the shape of the texts, never asserted as verbal quotation. This unit does not contain Joshua 1:5, so the mandatory Joshua 1:5 → Hebrews 13:5 flag does not apply here. The two marks govern all: ✦ = a human, public-domain source, named; ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)