The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

Leviticus19:1–8

Commandments for Holiness

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

Leviticus 19:1–8 — Commandments for Holiness. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

1

Then the LORD said to Moses,

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

Yah·weh way·ḏab·bêr ’el- mō·šeh lē·mōr

Word by word5 · parsed
יְהוָ֖הYah·wehThen the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
Yah·weh (H3068) — the covenant Name stands first, before the verb. The entire holiness-code of chapter 19 is hung on the Speaker's identity, which v. 2 will press home: “I, the LORD your God, am holy.”
וַיְדַבֵּ֥רway·ḏab·bêrsaidH1696
√ dâbar — perhaps properly, to arrangeConjunctive wawVerbPielConsecutive imperfectthird person masculine singular
way·ḏab·bêr (H1696), Piel consecutive imperfect — the standard formula opening a fresh legislative section. Gill notes this follows “quickly after he had delivered the above laws,” and Geneva: chapter 19 “may be regarded as an extension of the previous chapter.”
אֶל־’el-toH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPreposition
מֹשֶׁ֥הmō·šehMosesH4872
√ Môsheh — Mosheh, the Israelite lawgiverNounpropermasculine singular
mō·šeh (H4872) — Moses the mediator, not the author; the precepts are delivered to him to publish. Ellicott records that the second-Temple authorities counted this chapter as “embodying the Decalogue,” for which reason “it is read in public.”
לֵּאמֹֽרlē·mōr. . .H559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Preposition-lVerbQalInfinitive construct
lē·mōr (H559) — the quotation-opening infinitive; a function word that turns the verse into a doorway into the divine speech of vv. 2–37.
2

“Speak to the whole congregation of Israel and tell them: Be holy because I, the LORD your God, am holy.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

dab·bêr ’el- kāl- ‘ă·ḏaṯ bə·nê- yiś·rā·’êl wə·’ā·mar·tā ’ă·lê·hem tih·yū qə·ḏō·šîm kî ’ă·nî Yah·weh ’ĕ·lō·hê·ḵem qā·ḏō·wōš

Word by word15 · parsed
דַּבֵּ֞רdab·bêrSpeakH1696
√ dâbar — perhaps properly, to arrangeVerbPielImperativemasculine singular
dab·bêr (H1696), Piel imperative — the command to publish. JFB: “The will of God… was not locked up in the repositories of an unknown tongue, but communicated plainly and openly to the people.”
אֶל־’el-toH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPreposition
כָּל־kāl-the wholeH3605
√ kôl — properly, the wholeNounmasculine singular construct
עֲדַ֧ת‘ă·ḏaṯcongregationH5712
√ ʻêdâh — a stated assemblage (specifically, a concourse, or generally, a family or crowd)Nounfeminine singular construct
בְּנֵי־bə·nê-. . .H1121
√ bên — a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etcNounmasculine plural construct
יִשְׂרָאֵ֛לyiś·rā·’êlof IsraelH3478
√ Yisrâʼêl — Jisrael, a symbolical name of JacobNounpropermasculine singular
וְאָמַרְתָּ֥wə·’ā·mar·tāand tellH559
√ ʼâmar — to say (used with great latitude)Conjunctive wawVerbQalConjunctive perfectsecond person masculine singular
אֲלֵהֶ֖ם’ă·lê·hemthemH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPrepositionthird person masculine plural
תִּהְי֑וּtih·yūBeH1961
√ hâyâh — to exist, iVerbQalImperfectsecond person masculine plural
קְדֹשִׁ֣יםqə·ḏō·šîmholyH6918
√ qâdôwsh — sacred (ceremonially or morally)Adjectivemasculine plural
qə·ḏō·šîm (H6918), holy (plural) — the keynote of the book. Barnes: these words “express the keynote to the whole book of Leviticus.” Benson glosses it “separated from all the forementioned defilements, and entirely consecrated to God.” The command is also a promise of likeness: Gill draws the logic that closes the thread to 11:44 — “the more holy they were, the more like they would be to him.”
כִּ֣יbecauseH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
אֲנִ֖י’ă·nîIH589
√ ʼănîy — IPronounfirst person common singular
’ă·nî (H589), the emphatic I — the ground of every following precept. Ellicott counts the self-naming formula repeated “no less than sixteen times” through the chapter, the spine on which the injunctions cluster.
יְהוָ֥הYah·wehthe LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
אֱלֹהֵיכֶֽם׃’ĕ·lō·hê·ḵemyour GodH430
√ ʼĕlôhîym — gods in the ordinary senseNounmasculine plural constructsecond person masculine plural
קָד֔וֹשׁqā·ḏō·wōšam holyH6918
√ qâdôwsh — sacred (ceremonially or morally)Adjectivemasculine singular
qā·ḏō·wōš (H6918), holy (singular), of God — the same root as the plural command. Poole: God is holy “both in my essence, and in all my laws, which are holy and just and good… whereas the gods of the heathens are unholy.” The likeness Israel is summoned to is to the divine nature itself (cf. 11:44; the threads).
3

Each of you must respect his mother and father, and you must keep My Sabbaths. I am the LORD your God.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

’îš tî·rā·’ū wə·’eṯ- ’im·mōw wə·’ā·ḇîw tiš·mō·rū šab·bə·ṯō·ṯay ’ă·nî Yah·weh ’ĕ·lō·hê·ḵem

Word by word10 · parsed
אִ֣ישׁ’îšEachH376
√ ʼîysh — a man as an individual or a male personNounmasculine singular
תִּירָ֔אוּtî·rā·’ūof you must respectH3372
√ yârêʼ — to fearVerbQalImperfectsecond person masculine plural
tî·rā·’ū (H3372), fear — Keil ranks reverence to parents and Sabbath-keeping as “the two leading pillars of the moral government, and of social well-being.” Ellicott: as God is to be feared (Deut 6:13), so are His earthly representatives, the parents.
וְאֶת־wə·’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Conjunctive wawDirect object marker
אִמּ֤וֹ’im·mōwhis motherH517
√ ʼêm — a mother (as the bond of the family)Nounfeminine singular constructthird person masculine singular
’im·mōw (H517), his mother — placed first. Cambridge: “The mother is put first, as in Leviticus 21:2,” and reports Rashi's Mishnaic explanation that “the child by nature fears the father more than the mother,” so the mother is named first to level the duty.
וְאָבִיו֙wə·’ā·ḇîwand fatherH1
√ ʼâb — father, in a literal and immediate, or figurative and remote applicationConjunctive wawNounmasculine singular constructthird person masculine singular
תִּשְׁמֹ֑רוּtiš·mō·rūand you must keepH8104
√ shâmar — properly, to hedge about (as with thorns), iVerbQalImperfectsecond person masculine plural
tiš·mō·rū (H8104), keep (from a root “to hedge about as with thorns”) — the verb of guarding the Sabbath. Poole and Benson draw the limit it implies: if parents command the profaning of the Sabbath, “the children in that case must keep the sabbath, and prefer the command of God before the command of their parents.”
שַׁבְּתֹתַ֖יšab·bə·ṯō·ṯayMy SabbathsH7676
√ shabbâth — intermission, iNouncommon plural constructfirst person common singular
šab·bə·ṯō·ṯay (H7676), My Sabbaths — the fourth commandment joined to the fifth. Barnes notes these “are the only laws in the Decalogue which assume a positive shape, all the others being introduced by the formula, ‘Thou shalt not.’”
אֲנִ֖י’ă·nîIH589
√ ʼănîy — IPronounfirst person common singular
יְהוָ֥הYah·weham the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
אֱלֹהֵיכֶֽם׃’ĕ·lō·hê·ḵemyour GodH430
√ ʼĕlôhîym — gods in the ordinary senseNounmasculine plural constructsecond person masculine plural
4

Do not turn to idols or make for yourselves molten gods. I am the LORD your God.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

’al- tip̄·nū ’el- hā·’ĕ·lî·lîm ṯa·‘ă·śū lā·ḵem mas·sê·ḵāh lō wê·lō·hê ’ă·nî Yah·weh ’ĕ·lō·hê·ḵem

Word by word12 · parsed
אַל־’al-Do notH408
√ ʼal — not (the qualified negation, used as a deprecative)Adverb
תִּפְנוּ֙tip̄·nūturnH6437
√ pânâh — to turnVerbQalImperfectsecond person masculine plural
tip̄·nū (H6437), turn — Keil reads vv. 4 as “the first two commandments of the decalogue: viz., not to turn to idols to worship them… nor to make molten gods.” The verb of turning is the verb of worship's direction.
אֶל־’el-toH413
√ ʼêl — near, with or amongPreposition
הָ֣אֱלִילִ֔יםhā·’ĕ·lî·lîmidolsH457
√ ʼĕlîyl — good for nothing, by analArticleNounmasculine plural
hā·’ĕ·lî·lîm (H457), worthless-ones — a word of uncertain etymology, possibly suggesting the idea of gods from its sound (Cambridge), “similar to that of ’ël and ’ĕlôhîm , but always associated with the idea of worthlessness.” Its rarity (17 vv) makes its reuse by the prophets a genuine verbal chain (see the threads).
תַעֲשׂ֖וּṯa·‘ă·śūor makeH6213
√ ʻâsâh — to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest applicationVerbQalImperfectsecond person masculine plural
לָכֶ֑םlā·ḵemfor yourselves
Prepositionsecond person masculine plural
מַסֵּכָ֔הmas·sê·ḵāhmoltenH4541
√ maççêkâh — properly, a pouring over, iNounfeminine singular
mas·sê·ḵāh (H4541), molten — the cast image of Exodus 32's golden calf and Jeroboam's calves (1 Kings 12). The Pulpit Commentary: the molten clause “forbids the transgression of the second commandment, as the earlier part of the verse forbids the transgression of the first.”
לֹ֥א. . .H3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absAdverbNegative particle
וֵֽאלֹהֵי֙wê·lō·hêgodsH430
√ ʼĕlôhîym — gods in the ordinary senseConjunctive wawNounmasculine plural construct
אֲנִ֖י’ă·nîIH589
√ ʼănîy — IPronounfirst person common singular
יְהוָ֥הYah·weham the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
אֱלֹהֵיכֶֽם׃’ĕ·lō·hê·ḵemyour GodH430
√ ʼĕlôhîym — gods in the ordinary senseNounmasculine plural constructsecond person masculine plural
5

When you sacrifice a peace offering to the LORD, you shall offer it for your acceptance.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·ḵî ṯiz·bə·ḥū ze·ḇaḥ šə·lā·mîm Yah·weh tiz·bā·ḥu·hū lir·ṣō·nə·ḵem

Word by word7 · parsed
וְכִ֧יwə·ḵîWhenH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
תִזְבְּח֛וּṯiz·bə·ḥūyou sacrificeH2076
√ zâbach — to slaughter an animal (usually in sacrifice)VerbQalImperfectsecond person masculine plural
ṯiz·bə·ḥū (H2076), sacrifice — the verb that, with its cognate noun, frames the whole peace-offering. JFB: these offerings, “if thank offerings, were to be eaten on the day of their presentation; and if a freewill offering… on the second day.”
זֶ֥בַחze·ḇaḥvvvH2077
√ zebach — properly, a slaughter, iNounmasculine singular construct
שְׁלָמִ֖יםšə·lā·mîma peace offeringH8002
√ shelem — properly, requital, iNounmasculine plural
šə·lā·mîm (H8002), peace-offerings — from shelem, requital/recompense. Ellicott explains the placement: chapter 17 had bound all private slaughter to be “devoted to God as peace-offerings,” hence the turn here from idolatry to the peace-offering.
לַיהוָ֑הYah·wehto the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodPreposition-lNounpropermasculine singular
תִּזְבָּחֻֽהוּ׃tiz·bā·ḥu·hūyou shall offer itH2076
√ zâbach — to slaughter an animal (usually in sacrifice)VerbQalImperfectsecond person masculine pluralthird person masculine singular
לִֽרְצֹנְכֶ֖םlir·ṣō·nə·ḵemfor your acceptanceH7522
√ râtsôwn — delight (especially as shown)Preposition-lNounmasculine singular constructsecond person masculine plural
lir·ṣō·nə·ḵem (H7522), for your acceptance — the rarer sense (56 vv). Poole: “to your acceptation, i.e. in such manner as it may be accepted by God on your behalf… not in such manner as to lose the end you aim at, to wit, God’s acceptance.” The same root closes the unit's warning at v. 7 (yê·rā·ṣeh, be accepted).
6

It shall be eaten on the day you sacrifice it, or on the next day; but what remains on the third day must be burned up.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

yê·’ā·ḵêl bə·yō·wm ziḇ·ḥă·ḵem ū·mim·mā·ḥo·rāṯ wə·han·nō·w·ṯār ‘aḏ- haš·šə·lî·šî yō·wm bā·’êš yiś·śā·rêp̄

Word by word10 · parsed
יֵאָכֵ֖לyê·’ā·ḵêlIt shall be eatenH398
√ ʼâkal — to eat (literally or figuratively)VerbNifalImperfectthird person masculine singular
yê·’ā·ḵêl (H398), Niphal it shall be eaten — the same verb (ʼâkal, to eat) governs vv. 6–8 and is the rare shared lexeme with Isaiah 65:4 and Ezekiel 4:14 (see threads). The sacrificial meal has a clock on it.
בְּי֧וֹםbə·yō·wmon the dayH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)Preposition-bNounmasculine singular construct
זִבְחֲכֶ֛םziḇ·ḥă·ḵemyou sacrifice itH2077
√ zebach — properly, a slaughter, iNounmasculine singular constructsecond person masculine plural
וּמִֽמָּחֳרָ֑תū·mim·mā·ḥo·rāṯor on the next dayH4283
√ mochŏrâth — the morrow or (adverbially) tomorrowConjunctive waw, Preposition-mNounfeminine singular
ū·mim·mā·ḥo·rāṯ (H4283), the morrow — Ellicott infers from the two permitted days that the second class of peace-offering is meant; the thank-offering (Lev 7:15) allowed only one day.
וְהַנּוֹתָר֙wə·han·nō·w·ṯārbut what remainsH3498
√ yâthar — to jut over or exceedConjunctive waw, ArticleVerbNifalParticiplemasculine singular
עַד־‘aḏ-. . .H5704
√ ʻad — as far (or long, or much) as, whether of space (even unto) or time (during, while, until) or degree (equally with)Preposition
הַשְּׁלִישִׁ֔יhaš·šə·lî·šîon the thirdH7992
√ shᵉlîyshîy — thirdArticleNumberordinal masculine singular
haš·šə·lî·šî (H7992), the third — the line the meal may not cross. Keil notes this is the command of “Leviticus 7:15-18 emphatically repeated,” with extermination threatened for transgressors. The third day is the rare lexeme also shared with Lev 7:18 (the verbal thread).
י֣וֹםyō·wmdayH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)Nounmasculine singular
בָּאֵ֖שׁbā·’êšmust be burned upH784
√ ʼêsh — fire (literally or figuratively)Preposition-b, ArticleNouncommon singular
יִשָּׂרֵֽף׃yiś·śā·rêp̄. . .H8313
√ sâraph — to be (causatively, set) on fireVerbNifalImperfectthird person masculine singular
7

If any of it is eaten on the third day, it is tainted and will not be accepted.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·’im hê·’ā·ḵōl yê·’ā·ḵêl haš·šə·lî·šî bay·yō·wm hū pig·gūl lō yê·rā·ṣeh

Word by word9 · parsed
וְאִ֛םwə·’imIfH518
√ ʼim — used very widely as demonstrative, lo!Conjunction
הֵאָכֹ֥לhê·’ā·ḵōlany of it is eatenH398
√ ʼâkal — to eat (literally or figuratively)VerbNifalInfinitive absolute
hê·’ā·ḵōl (H398), the infinitive absolute intensifying the finite verb — Hebrew emphasis: the very act of eating is what condemns, however small the portion.
יֵאָכֵ֖לyê·’ā·ḵêl. . .H398
√ ʼâkal — to eat (literally or figuratively)VerbNifalImperfectthird person masculine singular
הַשְּׁלִישִׁ֑יhaš·šə·lî·šîon the thirdH7992
√ shᵉlîyshîy — thirdArticleNumberordinal masculine singular
בַּיּ֣וֹםbay·yō·wmdayH3117
√ yôwm — a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figurative (a space of time defined by an associated term), (often used adverb)Preposition-b, ArticleNounmasculine singular
ה֖וּאitH1931
√ hûwʼ — he (she or it)Pronounthird person masculine singular
פִּגּ֥וּלpig·gūlis taintedH6292
√ piggûwl — properly, fetid, iNounmasculine singular
pig·gūl (H6292), tainted-flesh — a technical cultic term (Cambridge: “it is an abomination… As in Leviticus 7:18”). Its rarity (4 vv) makes its appearances a true verbal fingerprint: the abomination of stale sacrifice (here, Lev 7:18), the unclean food Ezekiel will not eat (Ezek 4:14), and the broth of swine's flesh in apostate worship (Isa 65:4). See the threads.
לֹ֥אand will notH3808
√ lôʼ — not (the simple or absAdverbNegative particle
יֵרָצֶֽה׃yê·rā·ṣehbe acceptedH7521
√ râtsâh — to be pleased withVerbNifalImperfectthird person masculine singular
yê·rā·ṣeh (H7521), be accepted — Geneva supplies the missing agent: “not accepted… To wit, of God.” Acceptance is Godward throughout; the worshipper's intention cannot override the prescribed time.
8

Whoever eats it will bear his iniquity, for he has profaned what is holy to the LORD. That person must be cut off from his people.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Hebrew — tap a word ↓

wə·’ō·ḵə·lāw yiś·śā ‘ă·wō·nōw kî- ’eṯ- ḥil·lêl qō·ḏeš Yah·weh ha·hi·w han·ne·p̄eš wə·niḵ·rə·ṯāh mê·‘am·me·hā

Word by word12 · parsed
וְאֹֽכְלָיו֙wə·’ō·ḵə·lāwWhoever eatsH398
√ ʼâkal — to eat (literally or figuratively)Conjunctive wawVerbQalParticiplemasculine plural constructthird person masculine singular
יִשָּׂ֔אyiś·śāit will bearH5375
√ nâsâʼ — to lift, in a great variety of applications, literal and figurative, absolute and relativeVerbQalImperfectthird person masculine singular
yiś·śā (H5375), shall bear — Keil flags the form: “On the singular ישּׂא in Leviticus 19:8 , see at Genesis 27:29,” a grammatical note linking the cut-off formula's idiom across the Pentateuch.
עֲוֺנ֣וֹ‘ă·wō·nōwhis iniquityH5771
√ ʻâvôn — perversity, iNouncommon singular constructthird person masculine singular
‘ă·wō·nōw (H5771), his iniquityperversity, and by metonymy its punishment. The bearer of the guilt bears the sentence; there is no provided sacrifice to remove this particular profanation.
כִּֽי־kî-forH3588
√ kîy — (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below)Conjunction
אֶת־’eṯ-H853
√ ʼêth — properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)Direct object marker
חִלֵּ֑לḥil·lêlhe has profanedH2490
√ châlal — properly, to bore, iVerbPielPerfectthird person masculine singular
ḥil·lêl (H2490), he has profaned — the antonym of the chapter's keynote. To eat the holy flesh out of time is to make-common what God made holy; the holiness Israel is summoned to (v. 2) is the very thing this offender violates.
קֹ֥דֶשׁqō·ḏešwhat is holyH6944
√ qôdesh — a sacred place or thingNounmasculine singular construct
יְהוָ֖הYah·wehto the LORDH3068
√ Yᵉhôvâh — Jehovah, Jewish national name of GodNounpropermasculine singular
הַהִ֖ואha·hi·wThatH1931
√ hûwʼ — he (she or it)ArticlePronounthird person feminine singular
הַנֶּ֥פֶשׁhan·ne·p̄ešpersonH5315
√ nephesh — properly, a breathing creature, iArticleNounfeminine singular
וְנִכְרְתָ֛הwə·niḵ·rə·ṯāhmust be cut offH3772
√ kârath — to cut (off, down or asunder)Conjunctive wawVerbNifalConjunctive perfectthird person feminine singular
wə·niḵ·rə·ṯāh (H3772), be cut off — Keil cross-references the formula to Genesis 17:14 (the uncircumcised “cut off from his people”); the same severing-vocabulary binds covenant-breach across the Torah (see the threads). Barnes: “an immediate forfeiture of the privileges which belonged to him as one of the people in covenant with Yahweh.”
מֵעַמֶּֽיהָ׃mê·‘am·me·hāfrom his peopleH5971
√ ʻam — a people (as a congregated unit)Preposition-mNounmasculine plural constructthird person feminine singular

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. The Decalogue in miniature — why this chapter was read aloud — 1–4

The ancient readers heard chapter 19 not as a miscellany but as a compression of the whole Law. Ellicott records that “the authorities during the second Temple regarded it as ‘embodying the Decalogue,’ for which reason… ‘it is read in public.’” The structure is deliberate: the precepts “are divided into sixteen groups, eight of which end with the emphatic reiteration, ‘I am the Lord your God’… and eight with the shorter formula, ‘I am the Lord.’” Geneva goes further and maps the opening verses commandment-by-commandment: vv. 3–4 fall under “(1) the fifth commandment of the Decalogue, (2) the fourth, (3) the first, (4) the second.” The Hebrew bears this out — tî·rā·’ū (fear your mother and father, the fifth), tiš·mō·rū (keep My Sabbaths, the fourth), tip̄·nū (turn not to ʼĕlîlîm, the first), mas·sê·ḵāh (make no molten gods, the second). Geneva draws the boldest synthesis of all: this chapter “may in a way be regarded as the Old Testament counterpart of the Sermon on the Mount.” ⚙ That comparison is Geneva's, not the synthesis author's; what the synthesis adds is only the observation that the Hebrew word-order in v. 3 (mother before father) and the negative-then-positive sequence of the commandments are the seams along which the ancient editors did their work.

ii. Be holy, for I am holy — the ground of every precept — 2

Everything hangs on v. 2. Keil states the principle: the commandments “are all linked together by the common purpose expressed in Leviticus 19:2 in the words, ‘Ye shall be holy, for I am holy, Jehovah your God,’” and the verse “expresses on the one hand the principle upon which all the different commandments… were based, and on the other hand the goal which the Israelites were to keep before them.” Barnes calls it “the keynote to the whole book of Leviticus.” The grammar is doubled: the plural command qə·ḏō·šîm tih·yū (holy you shall be) is grounded by the singular predicate qā·ḏō·wōš (God is holy), joined by the causal . Poole sharpens the contrast that gives the holiness its content: God is holy “both in my essence, and in all my laws… whereas the gods of the heathens are unholy both in their laws and institutions.” The Pulpit Commentary already hears the new dispensation in it: “Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect” (Matthew 5:48). ⚙ The synthesis reads v. 2 as the hinge between the cultic and the ethical: holiness is not first a matter of ritual but of likeness, and the rest of the chapter — parents, Sabbath, idols, the honest scale, the loved neighbour — is simply what that likeness looks like in a human life.

iii. Holiness at the altar — the peace-offering's clock — 5–8

The chapter then does something the commentators find jarring: it drops from sweeping moral law into a narrow rule about leftover sacrificial meat. Ellicott explains the logic — chapter 17 had required that animals slaughtered for food “should first be devoted to God as peace-offerings,” so “hence the transition here from the prohibition of idolatrous worship to the peace-offerings.” The rule is a two-day window with a hard edge: eaten on the day or the morrow (mā·ḥo·rāṯ), but flesh that han·nō·w·ṯār (remains) to the third day is yiś·śā·rêp̄ (burned). Cross the line and the meal becomes pig·gūl — Gill's “corrupt and putrefied flesh… abominable to God” — and lō yê·rā·ṣeh, it shall not be accepted, the verbal echo of the râtsôwn (acceptance) the offering was brought for in v. 5. Keil sees no break with the moral law at all: “True fidelity to Jehovah was to be shown, so far as sacrifice… was concerned, in the fact, that the holiness of the sacrificial flesh was strictly preserved.” JFB supplies the likely reason for the severity: “to prevent any mysterious virtue being superstitiously attached to meat offered on the altar.” ⚙ The synthesis reads vv. 5–8 as holiness applied to time: the same God who is holy in essence demands that the holy thing be treated as holy on a calendar, and the man who profanes it (ḥil·lêl, v. 8) becomes the exact negative of the people summoned to be holy in v. 2 — and so is niḵ·rə·ṯāh, cut off.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

Read under Sola Scriptura, the unit makes one claim and then tests it on small things. The claim is v. 2: be holy, for I am holy. The test is everything after it. A modern reader expects the test to be grand — and the chapter does reach the great things (love your neighbour as yourself, v. 18, beyond this unit). But the first proofs of holiness here are almost domestic: fear your mother (named first), keep the Sabbath, refuse the ʼĕlîlîm — the nothings — and do not let yesterday's sacrifice rot into pig·gūl on your table. The pattern is that holiness is not measured by its ceiling but by its floor: by whether a man honours the parent he is tempted to neglect, keeps a day he is tempted to fill, and treats a holy thing as holy when no one but God is watching the third-day fire. The cut-off of v. 8 is sobering precisely because the offense is so ordinary — a meal eaten a day too late. ⚙ This synthesis reads that severity not as cruelty but as the seriousness of holiness: the God who is holy in His essence will not have His holiness handled carelessly, even in a scrap of meat. The honest difficulty the chapter leaves open — and which the New Testament will press — is that no one keeps a floor this exacting; the command to be holy is, finally, a command the commanded cannot meet without the Holy One supplying it.

Holiness is not measured by its ceiling but by its floor — the parent honoured, the day kept, the holy thing treated as holy when only God is watching.

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

Be holy, for I am holy — the formula that frames Leviticus structural / thematic — confirmed

The keynote of v. 2 is not unique to chapter 19; it is the refrain of the whole holiness material. The Verifier confirms the shared lexemes qâdôwsh (holy), ʼănîy (I), and the causal linking Leviticus 19:2 to 11:44, where the same demand closes the food laws. Gill makes the cross-reference explicit on this very verse: “the same words are used, after the laws given about creatures clean and unclean to be eaten, as here.” Because qâdôwsh is a moderately common word (106 verses) and the link is a repeated motto rather than a rare quotation, this is recorded as structural/thematic, not verbal — the connection is the deliberate refrain the editors built, attested by Gill and Keil, not a singular lexical fingerprint.

Leviticus 11:44 · Leviticus 20:7 · Leviticus 20:26

basis: Hebrew↔Hebrew; shared refrain-lexemes H6918 qâdôwsh (106 vv) + H589 ʼănîy + H3588 kîy — moderate frequency, so the link is the repeated holiness-formula (Gill cross-references 11:44 here), recorded structural not verbal (Verifier-confirmed)

The peace-offering's third day — v. 6–8 repeating Leviticus 7:15–18 structural / thematic — confirmed

Verses 5–8 are, by the commentators' unanimous account, a deliberate restatement of an earlier law. Keil: the command of “Leviticus 7:15-18 is emphatically repeated, and transgressors are threatened with extermination.” The Verifier confirms the verbal backbone shared with Leviticus 7:18 — zebach (sacrifice, 153 vv), shelem (peace-offering, 84 vv), and shᵉlîyshîy (third, 94 vv) — three substantive lexemes co-occurring, which is the recorded basis for a true verbal/structural link between the two laws. Cambridge and Ellicott both annotate v. 6–7 by pointing back to Leviticus 7:15–18. Because the shared words, though several, are not individually rare, this is tiered structural/thematic — a confirmed restatement, under-claiming the verbal tier where no single rare lexeme carries it.

Leviticus 7:18 · Leviticus 7:15

basis: Hebrew↔Hebrew; shared cluster H2077 zebach (153 vv) + H8002 shelem (84 vv) + H7992 shᵉlîyshîy (94 vv) — several moderate lexemes co-occurring, a confirmed restatement of Lev 7:15–18 (Keil, Cambridge), tiered structural (Verifier-confirmed)

Piggûl — the rare word for tainted sacrifice across Leviticus, Isaiah, and Ezekiel verbal / quotation — confirmed

The noun pig·gūl (H6292, tainted/fetid flesh) of v. 7 is among the rarest cultic words in Scripture — the Verifier finds it in only 4 verses. That scarcity makes its every appearance a genuine verbal link. It binds this peace-offering law to its parent at Leviticus 7:18, to Ezekiel 4:14 (where the prophet protests he has never let “abominable flesh” enter his mouth), and to Isaiah 65:4 (the apostates who sit among graves and eat swine's flesh with “broth of abominable things”). The Verifier records the basis for Lev 19:7↔Isaiah 65:4 and ↔Ezekiel 4:14 as the shared rare lexeme pig·gūl together with ʼâkal (to eat) — and for the Lev 7:18 pair adds râtsâh (be accepted) and shᵉlîyshîy (third). One verse defines the abomination, the prophets invoke the same word to indict false and unclean eating. Because pig·gūl is rare (4 vv), the verbal tier holds across the chain.

Leviticus 7:18 · Ezekiel 4:14 · Isaiah 65:4

basis: Hebrew↔Hebrew; rare shared lexeme H6292 piggûwl (in only 4 vv), with H398 ʼâkal, links Lev 19:7 to Lev 7:18, Ezek 4:14, Isa 65:4 (Verifier-confirmed)

ʼĕlîlîm — the rare "nothings" the prophets throw back at Israel verbal / quotation — confirmed

The word for idols in v. 4, ʼĕlîlîm (H457, worthless-ones), is rare — 17 verses — and the prophets seize on it. The Verifier confirms the shared lexeme between Leviticus 19:4 and Isaiah 2:8, 2:18, 10:10–11, 19:1–3, 31:7, Psalm 96:5, Habakkuk 2:18, Zechariah 11:17, and the chapter's own neighbour Leviticus 26:1. With Habakkuk 2:18 the Verifier returns a verbal tier, because there ʼĕlîlîm co-occurs with the equally pointed maççêkâh (molten image, 28 vv) — the exact pairing of Leviticus 19:4 (“turn not to ʼĕlîlîm… nor make molten gods”). Where only ʼĕlîlîm alone is shared (e.g. Isaiah 2:8), the Verifier tiers it structural/thematic — one rare word marking a sustained prophetic motif of the worthlessness of idols. The synthesis under-claims accordingly: verbal for the Habakkuk pair (two rare words together), structural for the broader single-lexeme chain across Isaiah and the Psalms.

Habakkuk 2:18 · Isaiah 2:8 · Leviticus 26:1 · Psalm 96:5

basis: Hebrew↔Hebrew; rare lexeme H457 ʼĕlîyl (17 vv) PLUS rare H4541 maççêkâh (28 vv) shared with Hab 2:18 = verbal (Verifier-confirmed); the single-lexeme chain to Isa 2:8 / Ps 96:5 / Lev 26:1 is structural

Honour your mother and father — the fifth commandment restated structural / thematic — confirmed

Verse 3 lifts the fifth commandment out of the Decalogue, sharing the kinship pair ʼêm (mother) and ʼâb (father) with Exodus 20:12 — a link the Verifier confirms. But it does two things the Decalogue does not: it commands fear (yârêʼ) rather than honour, and it names the mother first. Cambridge notes the same inversion at Leviticus 21:2 and reports Rashi's Mishnaic reason; Ellicott counts only three places in Scripture where the mother precedes (Gen 44:20; Lev 21:2; here). Because ʼâb and ʼêm are common words and Exodus 20:12 makes no quotation-claim on Leviticus, the link is the restatement of the commandment argued by the commentators, recorded as structural not verbal.

Exodus 20:12 · Leviticus 21:2 · Deuteronomy 5:16

basis: Hebrew↔Hebrew; shared common kinship lexemes H517 ʼêm + H1 ʼâb — frequent words, so the link is the fifth-commandment restatement (Cambridge, Ellicott), recorded structural not verbal (Verifier-confirmed)

Cut off from his people — the covenant-severing formula structural / thematic — confirmed

The sentence of v. 8 — wə·niḵ·rə·ṯāh mê·‘am·me·hā, that soul shall be cut off from his people — uses a formula Keil cross-references on this verse: “for the expression ‘shall be cut off,’ Genesis 17:14.” The Verifier confirms the shared lexemes kârath (cut off, 280 vv), nephesh (soul), ʻam (people), and hûwʼ linking Leviticus 19:8 to Genesis 17:14, where the uncircumcised is “cut off from his people.” Barnes reads the Levitical formula as “an ‘ipso facto’ excommunication or outlawry.” Because kârath and ʻam are common words shared as a recurring legal idiom rather than a unique citation, this is tiered structural/thematic — the karet-formula that runs through the Torah, Verifier-confirmed by the shared vocabulary but not resting on a single rare lexeme.

Genesis 17:14 · Leviticus 7:20 · Exodus 31:14

basis: Hebrew↔Hebrew; shared legal-idiom lexemes H3772 kârath (280 vv) + H5315 nephesh + H5971 ʻam — common words forming the recurring karet-formula (Keil cites Gen 17:14 here), recorded structural not verbal (Verifier-confirmed)

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

Be holy, for I am holy — taken up unchanged by the apostle Peter ancient/widely-held

The keynote of v. 2 is quoted, word for word in sense, in the New Testament. Peter writes: “As he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation; because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy” (1 Peter 1:15–16) — citing Leviticus by name in substance. The Pulpit Commentary, on this very verse, makes the connection: God “is to be our model so far as is possible to the creature. So in the new dispensation… ‘As he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation’ ( 1 Peter 1:15 ).” Ellicott (at v. 2) and JFB likewise chain v. 2 to 1 Peter 1:15. The link is cross-Testament (Greek↔Hebrew), so the Verifier finds no shared original-language lexeme — it rests entirely on the apostle's explicit citation as the commentators report it, not on the verbal index. But it is the oldest reading of the church: the command to be holy is not abolished but carried into the New Covenant and grounded in the holiness of the God who calls.

1 Peter 1:15 · 1 Peter 1:16 · Leviticus 19:2 · Matthew 5:48

Be perfect, as your Father is perfect — the Sermon on the Mount as this chapter's counterpart ancient/widely-held

Geneva itself reads chapter 19 as “the Old Testament counterpart of the Sermon on the Mount, inasmuch as it lays down the laws of conduct, as the latter lays down the principles of action.” The Pulpit Commentary draws the same line from v. 2 to Christ's own word: “Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect” (Matthew 5:48). The figural reading is therefore not novel allegory but the explicit handling of the commentators and of Christ Himself: the demand be holy as I am holy reappears on the Lord's lips as be perfect as your Father is perfect — the same logic of likeness to God, now spoken by the Son who alone fulfils it. The link is cross-Testament (Greek↔Hebrew), so it is asserted by Geneva, the Pulpit Commentary, and the Gospel text, not by the verbal index; tiered accordingly, but ancient and central.

Matthew 5:48 · Leviticus 19:2 · Leviticus 19:18

The third-day fire and the holiness no offerer could supply novel

The peace-offering law of vv. 5–8 protects a holiness the worshipper himself cannot guarantee: bring the offering for your acceptance (râtsôwn, v. 5), yet handle it wrongly and it becomes pig·gūl that cannot be accepted (v. 7), and the offerer is cut off (v. 8). ⚙ This synthesis reads the trajectory as the church has read the whole sacrificial system: a fellowship-meal hedged about with a clock and a curse points beyond itself to the one peace-offering whose holiness never decays — the “Lamb without blemish and without spot” whose blood, Peter says in the very passage that quotes Leviticus 19:2, redeems (1 Peter 1:18–19). Where the Levitical flesh must be burned by the third day lest it profane, the New Testament proclaims a sacrifice raised on the third day, that “saw no corruption” (Acts 2:31; 13:37). This extension beyond what the PD voices say in their own words is the fallible synthesis author's, offered under Sola Scriptura to be tested — the contrast of the corrupting offering and the incorruptible one is drawn here, not asserted by the commentators on these verses.

1 Peter 1:18-19 · Acts 13:37 · Hebrews 10:10 · Leviticus 19:6

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament (1860s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

This unit is the opening of the holiness-code (Lev 19:1–8), and the synthesis is built up from the Hebrew. Every commentary excerpt is a verbatim, contiguous substring of the sourced voices_raw — trimmed at the ends to a pointed quotation, never altered, reordered, or stitched. Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary is a whole-chapter note (anchored at 19:1 in the source) whose verbatim fragments are placed at the verses they bear on (vv. 2, 3, 4); the breadth of voices otherwise runs Ellicott, Geneva, Keil, Barnes, Poole, Benson, Cambridge, Pulpit, JFB, and Gill across the eight verses. A few honesty notes specific to this unit:

A translation BSB gets right against the KJV. The phrase lir·ṣō·nə·ḵem (v. 5) was famously rendered “at your own will” in the AV, as though the offering's manner were the offerer's option. Barnes, Ellicott, Poole, and Gill all correct this to “for your acceptance” — Godward, not optional — and BSB follows them. The divergence column flags this as a place where the modern translation restores the original sense the older English obscured.

Two glosses in the source parse are placeholders. The per-word data carries a “vvv” gloss on ze·ḇaḥ (19:5) and “. . .” on several function words and on yiś·śā·rêp̄ (19:6); these are artifacts of the Berean interlinear's alignment, not the synthesis author's, and the literal column reconstructs the words' true force (sacrifice, it shall be burned) from the Strong's roots and parse.

Same-Testament links are Verifier-confirmed; cross-Testament links are not. The Hebrew↔Hebrew threads — the holiness-formula (19:2↔11:44), the peace-offering restatement (19:6–8↔7:15–18), the rare pig·gūl chain (Lev 7:18, Ezek 4:14, Isa 65:4), the ʼĕlîlîm chain, the fifth-commandment and karet formulas — all rest on shared Strong's lexemes returned by the Verifier, and are tiered by the rarity of those lexemes: verbal only where a genuinely rare word carries it (pig·gūl 4 vv; ʼĕlîl+maççêkâh together at Hab 2:18), structural where the shared words are moderate or common (the holiness-refrain, the karet-idiom, the kinship terms), under-claiming where frequency makes a unique quotation unprovable.

The New Testament links cannot be verbal. The reuse of v. 2 by Peter (1 Peter 1:15–16), the Sermon-on-the-Mount counterpart (Matthew 5:48), and the third-day-incorruption contrast all cross from Hebrew into Greek; the Verifier returns no shared original-language lexeme for these pairs and explicitly flags them as connections that “must be argued, not asserted.” They are therefore tiered by attestation, not by the index: the Peter and Matthew links are ancient/widely-held, resting on the apostle's and the Lord's explicit words as the commentators (Pulpit, Ellicott, JFB, Geneva) report them; the third-day Christ note is marked novel, the synthesis author's own fallible reading offered to be tested, since the PD voices on these verses do not draw it in these words.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)