AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The substituted beast — both become holy verbal / quotation — confirmed
The animal-tithe ban on exchange (v. 33) restates the vow-law of Leviticus 27:10 almost word for word: no swap good-for-bad, and if one swaps, “both it and the change thereof shall be holy.” The link is lexical, not merely thematic — they share the rare noun təmûrāh (“substitute,” only 6 verses in the OT) and its verb mûr (10 verses), plus qōḏeš and the good/bad pair ṭōwḇ/raʻ. The Verifier rates the rarity of təmûrāh high enough to call this a confirmed verbal echo.
Leviticus 27:10 · Leviticus 27:33
basis: shared rare lexeme H8545 tᵉmûwrâh (only 6 vv) and H4171 mûwr (10 vv), with H6944 qôdesh and the ṭôwḇ/raʻ pair (H2896/H7451) — Verifier-confirmed verbal link (Hebrew↔Hebrew)
I will cause you to pass under the rod structural / thematic — confirmed
Ellicott, Benson, Poole, Cambridge and Keil & Delitzsch all read “passeth under the rod” (v. 32) against Ezekiel 20:37, where the LORD says, “I will cause you to pass under the rod, and I will bring you into the bond of the covenant.” The image of the tithe-count becomes an image of God claiming His people. The Verifier finds the shared vocabulary — šēḇeṭ (rod), tachaṯ (under), ʻāḇar (pass over) — but these are common words, so the connection is rated structural/thematic, an echo of motif rather than a quotation.
Leviticus 27:32 · Ezekiel 20:37
basis: shared lexemes H7626 shêbeṭ (178 vv), H8478 tachath (450 vv), H5674 ʻâbar (492 vv) — all common, so the shared imagery is a thematic motif, not a verbal quotation; named by Ellicott, Benson, Poole, Cambridge, K&D
Hezekiah’s heaps — the only other animal tithe structural / thematic — confirmed
Cambridge flags that the livestock tithe of v. 32 appears nowhere else in the Old Testament except 2 Chronicles 31:6, where Hezekiah’s reform brings in “the tithe of oxen and sheep, and the tithe of holy things which were consecrated unto the LORD.” That single later instance is the historical realization of this command, and the verbal contact is unusually full: the Verifier finds 2 Chronicles 31:6 reproduces nearly the whole construct chain of Leviticus 27:32 — maʻăśar (tithe), bāqār (herd), tsō’n (flock) and qōḏeš (holy). Yet every one of these is a common cult-and-agriculture term, so even four shared lexemes do not amount to a quotation; the Chronicler is describing the law being kept, not citing it. We therefore tier this structural/thematic — but as a strong, multi-word echo, not a thin one.
Leviticus 27:32 · 2 Chronicles 31:6
basis: shared lexemes H4643 maʻăsêr (27 vv), H1241 bâqâr (172 vv), H6629 tsôʼn (247 vv) and H6944 qôdesh (382 vv) — the whole herd-and-flock-tithe construct of Lev 27:32 recurs, but all are common terms, so this is the historical realization of the law (per Cambridge), structural rather than a quotation
The tithe assigned to Levi structural / thematic — confirmed
Why this tithe is the LORD’s, and what becomes of it, is supplied by Numbers 18:21 — “I have given the children of Levi all the tenth in Israel for an inheritance.” The Pulpit Commentary, Keil & Delitzsch and Gill all route Leviticus 27:30–32 forward to this Levitical appropriation. The shared word is maʻăśar (tithe), of moderate frequency; the link is the law and its administration, so it is structural, not a quotation.
Leviticus 27:30 · Numbers 18:21 · Deuteronomy 14:23
basis: shared lexeme H4643 maʻăsêr (27 vv) across the tithe-legislation cluster (Num 18; Deut 14) — the administrative complement to Lev 27, structural/thematic, not verbal quotation
The shepherd who passes His own flock under the rod structural / thematic — confirmed
The counting-rod of v. 32 sits inside the Old Testament’s wider pastoral vocabulary. Ezekiel 34 turns the same shepherd-and-flock imagery against Israel’s false shepherds and toward the LORD as the true Shepherd: “I, even I, will both search my sheep (tsō’n), and seek them out… I will feed them upon the mountains of Israel.” The shared word is tsō’n (“flock,” 247 vv) — a common term, so this is an imagery-level kinship, not a quotation: the rod that counts the tithe-animal in Leviticus and the rod/staff that gathers the flock in Ezekiel 34 (and Psalm 23:4; Micah 7:14) belong to one pastoral world. The Verifier rates it structural/thematic. This is the textual footing for the Good-Shepherd typology developed in the Christ section — held there as figure, not as the plain sense of this law.
Leviticus 27:32 · Ezekiel 34:11 · Psalm 23:4
basis: shared lexeme H6629 tsôʼn (247 vv) with Ezekiel 34:11 — a common pastoral term, so shared shepherd-and-flock imagery (rod, counting, gathering), not a verbal quotation; the OT footing for the Good-Shepherd figure
Older than Sinai — Abraham and Jacob flagged — verify source
Keil & Delitzsch, the Pulpit Commentary and JFB all insist the tithe is “introduced as something well known” — Abraham gave a tenth to Melchizedek (Genesis 14:20) and Jacob vowed the tenth at Bethel (Genesis 28:22), so “the practice of the payment of tithes was not of Mosaic institution, but immemorial.” The Verifier confirms a shared maʻăśar with Genesis 14:20 (a real verbal point of contact), but Genesis 28:22 uses different vocabulary for “tenth” and shares no indexed lexeme — so the much-cited Jacob link is flagged: it rests on the commentators’ argument, not on the words.
Genesis 14:20 · Genesis 28:22 · Leviticus 27:30
basis: Genesis 14:20 shares H4643 maʻăsêr (structural); Genesis 28:22 shares NO indexed original-language lexeme with Lev 27:30 — the patriarchal-precedent claim is the commentators’ (K&D, Pulpit, JFB), asserted thematically, so flagged for verification