Then Mary said: “My soul magnifies the Lord,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai Mariam eipen mou hē psychē Megalynei ton Kyrion
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
Mary’s Song
Luke 1:46–56 — Mary’s Song. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
Then Mary said: “My soul magnifies the Lord,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai Mariam eipen mou hē psychē Megalynei ton Kyrion
and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior!
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai mou to pneuma ēgalliasen epi tō Theō mou tō Sōtēri
For He has looked with favor on the humble state of His servant. From now on all generations will call me blessed.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
hoti epeblepsen epi tēn tapeinōsin tēs autou doulēs apo tou nyn pasai hai geneai gar idou me makariousin
For the Mighty One has done great things for me. Holy is His name.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
hoti ho dynatos epoiēsen megala moi kai hagion autou to onoma
His mercy extends to those who fear Him, from generation to generation.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai autou to eleos eis tois phoboumenois auton geneas kai geneas
He has performed mighty deeds with His arm; He has scattered those who are proud in the thoughts of their hearts.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Epoiēsen kratos en autou brachioni dieskorpisen hyperēphanous dianoia autōn kardias
He has brought down rulers from their thrones, but has exalted the humble.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
katheilen dynastas apo thronōn kai hypsōsen tapeinous
He has filled the hungry with good things, but has sent the rich away empty.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
eneplēsen peinōntas agathōn kai exapesteilen ploutountas kenous
He has helped His servant Israel, remembering to be merciful,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
antelabeto autou paidos Israēl mnēsthēnai eleous
as He promised to our fathers, to Abraham and his descendants forever.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kathōs elalēsen pros hēmōn tous pateras tō Abraam kai tō autou spermati eis ton aiōna
Mary stayed with Elizabeth for about three months and then returned home.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de Mariam Emeinen syn autē hōs treis mēnas kai hypestrepsen eis autēs ton oikon
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
Luke gives the greatest song in his Gospel two words of setting: Καὶ Μαριὰμ εἶπεν, “And Mary said.” Pulpit makes the contrast do real work: Elizabeth “was filled with the Holy Ghost” and spoke “with a loud voice,” while Mary, on this occasion, shows no sign of a sudden visitation, and Pulpit infers that she had been living under that influence continuously since the annunciation, so that “hence the quiet introduction to her hymn.” Then comes the borrowing. Ellicott states it as plain fact: the song “is manifestly based upon that of Hannah (1 Samuel 2:1-10), both in its opening words and in much of its substance.” Cambridge is blunter still, that it is “so full of Hebraisms as almost to form a mosaic of quotations from the Old Testament.” JFB adds the musical image, that the strain of Hannah's ancient song “is caught up, and just slightly modified and sublimed.” Maclaren meets head on the critical argument that this borrowing proves forgery, and turns it around: “must the simple village maiden be a poetess because she is the mother of our Lord?” The absence of originality, he argues, favours its genuineness. ⚙ Worth noticing what the Greek adds to all this: the first verb, Μεγαλύνει, is present, and the second, ἠγαλλίασεν, is aorist, which Cambridge identifies as gnomic. The song begins in the middle of an act and immediately steps back into what God characteristically does.
Two rare words carry v. 48. ἐπέβλεψεν (three verses in the New Testament) is the favorable gaze; ταπείνωσιν (four verses) is the low condition gazed at. Geneva glosses the noun literally, “My baseness, that is, my base estate: so that the virgin did not boast of her deserts, but the grace of God,” and Poole insists that the translators were right to render it “low estate,” adding that “Mary doubtless doth not here commend her own humility.” Gill gives the material detail: David's house “had its seat not at Jerusalem, but at Nazareth, in Galilee,” and she was betrothed to a carpenter. Cambridge places her with Hagar (Genesis 16:11) and Hannah (1 Samuel 1:11). So the ground of the praise is not her virtue but her position, and the verb of the crowd's response, μακαριοῦσίν, is future and passive toward her: Benson, following Doddridge, presses that it means “shall call me happy,” since the Greek for “blessed” proper is eulogētos. Then v. 49 names the doer: ὁ δυνατός, which Cambridge identifies with El Shaddai and Gibbôr, and the deed, μεγάλα, which Benson shows the Septuagint uses for the miracles in Egypt and the wilderness. Barnes and Cambridge agree that “holy is His name” means God Himself is holy, Shem being a reverent Hebrew periphrasis.
From v. 51 the song turns to a run of aorists: He did might, He scattered, He pulled down, He lifted, He filled, He sent away. Pulpit reads them prophetically, that Mary “speaks or writes as though the future had become the past.” Cambridge reads them grammatically, that “the aorists throughout are gnomic, i. e. they do not express single but normal acts,” and would translate “He puts down potentates from thrones.” ⚙ These two readings are not rivals so much as two ends of one claim, and the Greek slightly favours Cambridge, since gnomic aorist is a recognised category and the verse pairs are proverbial in shape. Poole supplies the historical instances without deciding the grammar: “thus he did by Pharaoh, Nebuchadnezzar,” and on the other side “thus he exalted Moses, Joseph, Jacob, David.” The vocabulary is pointedly rare: βραχίων (three verses), δυνάστης (three verses), ὑπερήφανος (five verses), ταπεινός (eight verses), ἐμπίπλημι (five verses). Geneva catches the picture in the scattering verb, “Even as the wind does to the chaff,” and records honestly that the dative διανοίᾳ may mean either that He scattered them along with the imagination of their hearts or that He scattered them by means of it. Ellicott notes that the couplet of v. 53 anticipates the beatitudes of Luke 6:21, and Pulpit exclaims at how the virgin “caught the thought, almost the very words,” of the sermon her Son would preach thirty years later.
Maclaren observes the structure: “in the earlier part the personal element is present, and in the later it fades entirely.” The last two verses have no first person singular at all. ἀντελάβετο is, per Cambridge, literally “took by the hand,” and points to Isaiah 41:8-9 in the Greek; Barnes gives the same force, “to take hold of one, to help him up when he is in danger of falling.” Ellicott identifies παιδὸς as the Servant title of the later chapters of Isaiah, “identified with the nation, as elsewhere with the nation's Head,” and draws a dating inference from it: at the time Luke wrote, the rejection rather than the restoration of Israel was the dominant thought, so an unclouded hope like this one reads as early. Cambridge repunctuates v. 55 so that “to Abraham and his seed” attaches to “to remember His mercy,” with “even as He spake to our fathers” as a parenthesis, and Ellicott independently argues the same construction from the Greek; JFB agrees that the sense requires the clause to be read as a parenthesis, and cites Micah 7:20 and Psalm 98:3. Then the song ends and Luke returns to household prose: three months, and home. Gill notes that three months was exactly the rabbinic waiting period by which it was determined whether a woman was with child, which makes the stay itself a kind of confirmation. JFB stands back at the scene: “What an honored roof was that which, for such a period, overarched these cousins!”
⚙ Our own fallible reading, offered to be tested. The Magnificat is not a poem about a humble woman; it is a poem about a God who looks down and then acts downward, and the woman is the evidence. Read the vocabulary as a chain and the structure appears without any help from us. ταπείνωσιν in v. 48 is the low condition God looked at; ταπεινούς in v. 52 is the class He lifts, from the same root; and δυνατός, the Mighty One who did great things to her in v. 49, is the same root as δυνάστας, the potentates He takes down off their thrones in v. 52. Put those two pairs side by side and the private mercy and the public reversal are the one act described twice, once in the singular and once in the plural. That is why we think Cambridge's gnomic aorist is the better reading of the six past tenses: Mary is not predicting that God will do something, and not only recalling that He once did, but naming what He is like, with herself as the case in hand. The song's nerve is that the case in hand is not yet visible to anyone. Nothing has fallen. Herod is on his throne, Rome is intact, the rich are eating, and a pregnant girl in a hill town of Judah says all of it is already over, on the strength of an oath sworn to Abraham and a child not yet born. If she is wrong, the song is delusion. If she is right, then every arrangement of power described in v. 52 is being scored against a verdict already entered. We also take Barnes's caution seriously: the beatitude of v. 48 is real (“it is therefore right to consider her as highly favored or happy”), and it terminates on God, since the very next clause makes the Mighty One the actor and her the recipient. The line printed as our pullquote is machine commentary, not Scripture, and should be tested against the text and discarded if it fails.
She does not ask God to pull the thrones down; she sings as though the pulling were finished, and the only evidence on the table is that He looked at her.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
Every commentator in this brief says it. Ellicott: the song “is manifestly based upon that of Hannah (1 Samuel 2:1-10), both in its opening words and in much of its substance.” Cambridge: “closely analogous to the Song of Hannah.” JFB: the strain of Hannah's ancient song “is caught up, and just slightly modified and sublimed.” Barnes notes the striking similarity, and Maclaren answers the critics who call the resemblance fatal to its authenticity. The correspondences run phrase by phrase: the exulting heart, the raising of the poor from the dust, the full hiring themselves out for bread while the hungry cease to hunger (1 Samuel 2:5), the LORD who brings low and lifts up (1 Samuel 2:7). ⚙ Notice, though, that this is a link of pattern and diction, not of citation: Luke never says “as it is written,” and no clause of the Magnificat reproduces a clause of 1 Samuel 2 word for word.
1 Samuel 2:1-10 · 1 Samuel 1:11
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek text against a Hebrew original), so shared Strong's numbers are impossible by construction and no verbal tier is available; the wording is Hannah's and the Psalter's rather than a quotation formula. Basis is the recorded judgment of Ellicott, Cambridge, JFB, Barnes and Maclaren that the hymn is modelled on Hannah's, plus the shared motif set (lowliness regarded, the mighty brought low, the hungry filled). Cambridge adds 1 Samuel 1:11 for the phrase about the low estate of the handmaid.
The pair ὑπερηφάνους and ταπεινούς in vv. 51 and 52 is not a general contrast; both words are rare, and they occur together elsewhere in the New Testament only in one sentence, quoted twice, that God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble (James 4:6, 1 Peter 5:5). The Verifier confirms the shared lexemes. ⚙ Both of those apostolic texts are themselves quoting Proverbs 3:34 in Greek, which means Mary, James and Peter are drawing on a common stock of Greek Old Testament wording rather than on each other.
James 4:6 · 1 Peter 5:5
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G5244 ὑπερήφανος (in 5 vv) and G5011 ταπεινός (in 8 vv), both rare, occurring as the same contrasted pair. All refs are New Testament, Greek to Greek, so the verbal tier is legitimate; the link is one of shared Septuagintal diction, not of one text citing another.
ταπείνωσιν (G5014) stands in only four verses of the New Testament, and the one that matters most is in Luke's own second volume: the Ethiopian is reading Isaiah 53 aloud, “in his humiliation his judgment was taken away, and who will declare his generation” (Acts 8:33). The Verifier records both that noun and γενεά as shared. Cambridge, commenting on Luke 1:48, points to exactly this verse for the sense of the word: “The word may be rendered humiliation, Acts 8:33.” ⚙ The result is that Luke uses the same rare noun for the state God looked at in Mary and for the state of the Servant whose generation no one can declare, and then in Acts has the evangelist begin from that verse and preach Jesus.
Acts 8:33
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G5014 ταπείνωσις (in 4 vv, rare) and G1074 γενεά (in 37 vv). Both refs are New Testament and by the same author, so the verbal tier applies; note that Acts 8:33 is itself quoting Isaiah 53:8 in Greek, so the Isaianic link behind it would be cross-Testament and is not claimed here as verbal.
When Gabriel finished, Mary answered “Behold the δούλη of the Lord” (Luke 1:38); eight verses later that is still the only word she uses for herself. The noun stands in just three verses of the New Testament, and the third is Peter at Pentecost quoting Joel: “on My menservants and My maidservants I will pour out My Spirit in those days” (Acts 2:18). The Verifier records the shared lexeme in both cases. ⚙ Read forward, the term she chose for her own nothingness is the term Joel had already chosen for those on whom the Spirit would fall.
Luke 1:38 · Acts 2:18
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G1399 δούλη (in 3 vv, rare), plus G3137 Μαρία and G2400 ἰδού with Luke 1:38, and G4151 πνεῦμα with Acts 2:18. All refs are New Testament, Greek to Greek. The onward link from Acts 2:18 to Joel 2:29 is a Greek to Hebrew link and is deliberately not claimed as verbal here.
βραχίων (G1023) appears in only three New Testament verses, and Mary has one of them. The second is Paul in the synagogue at Antioch: God exalted the people in Egypt and “with an uplifted arm He led them out of that land” (Acts 13:17), where the Verifier also records the shared ὑψόω and Ἰσραήλ. The third is John's citation of Isaiah 53:1, “to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed” (John 12:38). Poole explains the figure itself, that God is spoken of as having an arm by which no more is signified than a mighty power, and Benson reports Grotius grading finger, hand and arm, with the arm reserved for the Red Sea (Exodus 15:16).
Acts 13:17 · John 12:38
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G1023 βραχίων (in 3 vv, rare) with both refs, plus G5312 ὑψόω (in 16 vv) and G2474 Ἰσραήλ (in 66 vv) with Acts 13:17. All refs are New Testament, Greek to Greek. The Exodus 15:16 and Isaiah 53:1 backgrounds are cross-Testament and are stated here as commentary, not as a verbal claim.
Ellicott notes that the couplet of v. 53 anticipates the beatitudes as Luke reports them, and Pulpit is astonished that the virgin caught “the thought, almost the very words” of the sermon preached thirty years later. The Verifier gives the mechanism: Luke 6:25 shares the participle πεινάω, the rare verb ἐμπίπλημι and the adverb νῦν with this unit. ⚙ The overlap is one author's vocabulary, which is a real and checkable link and also the reason it should not be pressed as proof of literary dependence in either direction.
Luke 6:25 · Luke 6:21
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G3983 πεινάω (in 23 vv), G1705 ἐμπίπλημι (in 5 vv, rare) and G3568 νῦν (in 140 vv) with Luke 6:25; Luke 6:21 is added as the matching beatitude on the same vocabulary. All refs are New Testament and by the same author. The direction of dependence is not claimed.
The song ends on an oath. Cambridge repunctuates v. 55 so that the object of remembering is the mercy promised “to Abraham and his seed for ever,” and cites Micah 7:20, “Thou wilt perform … the mercy to Abraham, which thou hast sworn unto our fathers from the days of old,” with Galatians 3:16 on the singular seed. JFB adds Psalm 98:3. Poole carries it back to the covenant itself in Genesis, and Barnes to Genesis 22:17-18. ⚙ This is why ἔλεος in vv. 50 and 54 should not be read as leniency: in this register it renders Hebrew chesed, sworn covenant loyalty, and the last word of the hymn, εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα, is the term of the oath, not a flourish.
Micah 7:20 · Genesis 22:17 · Genesis 17:7 · Psalm 103:17
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's numbers cannot be computed and no verbal tier is possible. Basis is the recorded citation of Micah 7:20 by Cambridge and JFB, of Genesis 22:17-18 by Barnes, of the Abrahamic promise by Poole and Gill, and of Psalm 103:17 by Poole for the near-identical wording of v. 50; the link is of covenant formula and motif, not of quotation.
Luke does not give this song to a barren woman who has been given a child. He gives it to a virgin, standing inside the house of a barren woman who has been given a child. The commentators supply the separate links: Cambridge sets Mary's low estate beside Hagar (Genesis 16:11) and Hannah (1 Samuel 1:11), and Ellicott, Cambridge, JFB and Barnes all derive the hymn itself from Hannah's. ⚙ The figure is what those links make when laid together. From Sarah onward the Scriptures tell of wombs shut and then opened by God alone, and what comes out of them is a song saying that the shut and the low are where God works. Elizabeth is the last of that line; Mary is not in it. Nothing in her was closed, and what she is given is not a child late but a child with no father. Offered to be tested, not asserted.
1 Samuel 1:11 · Genesis 16:11 · Genesis 21:1-2 · Luke 1:7
basis: Figural, and deliberately not verbal: the Hebrew refs stand against a Greek text, so no shared Strong's basis exists or is claimed. The sourced part is Cambridge's citation of Hagar (Genesis 16:11) and Hannah (1 Samuel 1:11) at Luke 1:48 and the unanimous derivation of the hymn from Hannah's song. The figural step, reading the barren-womb narratives as a type that the virgin conception stands outside of rather than inside, is widely held in Christian tradition but is asserted by no voice in this brief; treat it as ours and test it.
JFB glosses ἀντελάβετο in v. 54 by comparing Psalm 89:19, “I have laid help on One that is mighty.” Cambridge instead takes the verb literally as “took by the hand” and sends the reader to Isaiah 41:8-9 in the Greek. ⚙ We record both and press neither. The English word “help” is doing the connecting in JFB's note; whether the Greek verb here answers the Greek of that Psalm is exactly the kind of claim that cannot be settled from shared Strong's numbers across the Testaments, and the Verifier offers no basis for it. Ellicott's Isaiah 41:8 identification of the Servant with the nation is the better supported of the two proposals, and even that is a structural reading.
Psalm 89:19 · Isaiah 41:8
basis: Provenance contested. The Psalm 89:19 connection is JFB's alone and rests on the English rendering “help”; no shared lexeme basis exists or could exist for a Greek to Hebrew pair, and the Verifier returned no candidate for it. Isaiah 41:8 is on firmer ground (Cambridge cites the Greek of Isaiah 41:8-9 for ἀντιλαμβάνομαι, Ellicott and Barnes for the Servant title), but it too is cross-Testament and would at most be structural. Flagged so the reader checks before repeating either.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
The hinge is Σωτῆρί in v. 47. Ellicott holds that the choice of the word was determined by the meaning of the name she had been told to give her Son. Benson says she turns her thoughts here to Christ Himself, who was to be born of her, and that she rejoiced in hope of salvation through faith in Him more than in being His mother in the flesh. Gill reaches the same place from the other direction, that the consideration of Christ as God her Savior “gave her greater joy, than being the mother of him as man.” JFB draws the negative consequence: a woman singing of her Savior is not claiming to be sinless. Barnes and Poole both insist she praises God as one who had regarded her, not as one who owed her. ⚙ The structure of the Greek presses the same way, since the whole song has one subject: He looked, He did, He scattered, He pulled down, He lifted, He filled, He took hold. She is never the subject of a saving verb.
Luke 1:47 · Luke 2:11 · Isaiah 45:21
Mary sings that God “did might with His arm” (v. 51). The only other uses of βραχίων in the New Testament are Paul's account of the Exodus (Acts 13:17) and John's citation of Isaiah, “Lord, who has believed our message, and to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?” (John 12:38), which John applies to the unbelief that met Jesus. Gill already reads v. 51 this way, that the strength shown with His arm is the working out of salvation by one “mighty to save, and travelling in the greatness of his strength,” citing Isaiah 63:1. ⚙ Taken together, the arm that split the sea is the arm revealed in a Servant who was not believed, and Mary names it while the arm in question is an embryo. The identification of the arm of the LORD with Christ is the ancient reading recorded in John's own citation.
John 12:38 · Isaiah 53:1 · Acts 13:17
v. 52 is built from two verbs, καθεῖλεν and ὕψωσεν, and one rare adjective, ταπεινούς. ⚙ Each of the three reappears at the center of the apostolic account of Christ Himself: He humbled Himself and God exalted Him (Philippians 2:8-9), and the verb Luke uses here for taking potentates down off thrones is the verb he uses at Luke 23:53 for taking a body down from a cross. Cambridge's reading of the aorists as gnomic makes this more than a play on words: if the couplet states God's normal way of acting, then the deepest instance of it is not a king deposed but the Son who went down before He was lifted. We mark this as our own reading. The kenosis pattern is ancient and universally held; the specific pairing of Luke's katheilen and hypsōsen in the Magnificat with Philippians 2 is not claimed by any voice in this brief, and should be tested rather than repeated on our authority.
Philippians 2:8-9 · Luke 23:53 · Luke 18:14
v. 54 calls Israel God's παῖς. Ellicott identifies the term as the Servant of the later chapters of Isaiah, who at Isaiah 41:8 is the nation and elsewhere the nation's Head (Isaiah 42:1). Cambridge translates the verb literally, “took by the hand,” pointing to the Greek of Isaiah 41:8-9, and repunctuates the sentence so that the mercy remembered is the mercy sworn to Abraham, citing Micah 7:20 and Galatians 3:16 on the singular seed. Poole reads “Israel” here as believers, Abraham's seed who lived in the faith and expectation of the Messiah, and Gill likewise as the elect of both Jew and Gentile. ⚙ The Greek noun σπέρματι is singular, which is the whole of Paul's argument in Galatians 3:16; we do not claim Luke intends Paul's point, only that the same singular stands in the text.
Isaiah 41:8-9 · Isaiah 42:1 · Galatians 3:16 · Micah 7:20
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text: BSB (CC0) with the Berean interlinear and Strong's numbers; the eleven verses of this unit are all Greek, and every parse, gloss and lexeme frequency cited above comes from that apparatus rather than from our own analysis.
What is uncertain. (1) Attribution. A small number of Old Latin witnesses read “Elizabeth said” at v. 46 instead of “Mary said,” and the question has been argued in the modern period; no voice in this brief raises it, and the Greek manuscript tradition supports Mary, which is what the text above follows. We record the variant so the reader knows it exists. (2) The tense question. Cambridge's claim that the aorists of vv. 51 to 53 are gnomic and Pulpit's claim that they are prophetic past tenses are genuinely different readings of the same forms; we lean to Cambridge but the choice is interpretive, not settled by the parse, which reports only aorist indicative active. (3) The punctuation of vv. 54 and 55. Ellicott, Cambridge and JFB all argue that “as He spake to our fathers” is a parenthesis and that “to Abraham and his seed” depends on “to remember His mercy.” That is a decision about a text with no original punctuation, and BSB's rendering reflects a different choice. (4) The dative διανοίᾳ in v. 51 is ambiguous and Geneva records both constructions; English translations must pick one silently.
Provenance of the cross-references. Every thread badge above states its own basis. Greek to Greek links inside the New Testament are tiered verbal only where the Verifier reports a genuinely rare shared lexeme. Every link to the Hebrew Scriptures, including the Hannah model that the commentators are unanimous about, is tiered structural or typological, because shared Strong's numbers cannot be computed across the Testaments and because the Magnificat cites nothing: as Cambridge puts it, it is a mosaic. One thread (Psalm 89:19) is flagged rather than tiered, since it rests on an English word rather than a checkable Greek one.
Limits of the machine layer. The ⚙ material above (literal renderings, divergences, word notes, the sola reading, and the third Christ entry) is fallible synthesis and is marked as such. Where it goes beyond a named voice it says so. The commentary excerpts are verbatim public-domain text quoted under the tag of the author named; the polemical passages in JFB, Poole, Barnes and Gill against Roman devotion to Mary are seventeenth to nineteenth century controversy reproduced as written, and the reader should weigh them as such rather than as exegesis of the Greek.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)