The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

Luke5:12–16

The Leper’s Prayer

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

Luke 5:12–16 — The Leper’s Prayer. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

12

While Jesus was in one of the towns, a man came along who was covered with leprosy. When he saw Jesus, he fell facedown and begged Him, “Lord, if You are willing, You can make me clean.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

Kai egeneto en auton tō einai en mia tōn poleōn kai anēr idou plērēs lepras de idōn ton Iēsoun pesōn epi prosōpon edeēthē autou legōn Kyrie ean thelēs dynasai katharisai me

Word by word31 · parsed
ΚαὶKaiWhileG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
Coordinating καί, carrying the Septuagintal rhythm.
ἐγένετοegeneto. . .G1096
√ γίνομαι — to cause to be ("gen"-erate), iVerbAorist Indicative Middle3rd Person Singular
γίνομαι: to come to be, to happen The Septuagintal narrative opener. Luke, who elsewhere writes polished Greek, keeps this Hebraic hinge at the start of the episode, setting the healing inside the idiom of Israel's own scriptures rather than the idiom of Greek biography.
ἐνen. . .G1722
√ ἐν — "in," at, (up-)on, by, etcPreposition
αὐτὸνauton[Jesus]G846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounAccusative Masculine 3rd Person Singular
τῷG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleDative Neuter Singular
εἶναιeinaiwasG1510
√ εἰμί — I exist (used only when emphatic)VerbPresent Infinitive Active
ἐνeninG1722
√ ἐν — "in," at, (up-)on, by, etcPreposition
μιᾷmiaoneG1520
√ εἷς — oneAdjectiveDative Feminine Singular
τῶνtōnof theG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleGenitive Feminine Plural
πόλεωνpoleōntownsG4172
√ πόλις — a town (properly, with walls, of greater or less size)NounGenitive Feminine Plural
καὶkaiG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
ἀνὴρanēra manG435
√ ἀνήρ — a man (properly as an individual male)NounNominative Masculine Singular
ἰδοὺidou[came along]G2400
√ ἰδού — used as imperative lo!VerbAorist Imperative Active2nd Person Singular
ἰδού: behold, lo A frozen aorist imperative doing the work of a pointing finger. Pulpit takes it as eyewitness residue: the expression reproduces exactly the scene as the eye-witness remembered it, a man who should not have been there suddenly standing in the road.
πλήρηςplērēs[who was] coveredG4134
√ πλήρης — replete, or covered overAdjectiveNominative Masculine Singular
πλήρης: full, replete, covered over The word grades the case. By Leviticus 13:13 a whiteness that had covered the whole body could actually be pronounced clean, so Luke's "full" is not that verdict but its opposite: the disease at its worst and still under sentence. Cambridge calls the state a living death, indicated by bare head, rent clothes, and covered lip.
λέπραςlepraswith leprosyG3014
√ λέπρα — scaliness, iNounGenitive Feminine Singular
λέπρα: scaliness, leprosy A rare noun, standing in only four verses of the Greek New Testament, and in every one of them it is being removed by Jesus. Under Leviticus 13 the condition was handled less as sickness than as uncleanness, which is why the cure will have to be certified by a priest and not by a physician.
δὲdeG1161
√ δέ — but, and, etcConjunction
ἰδὼνidōnWhen he sawG3708
√ ὁράω — by extension, to attend toVerbAorist Participle ActiveNominative Masculine Singular
τὸνtonG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleAccusative Masculine Singular
ἸησοῦνIēsounJesusG2424
√ Ἰησοῦς — Jesus (iNounAccusative Masculine Singular
πεσὼνpesōnhe fellG4098
√ πίπτω — to fall (literally or figuratively)VerbAorist Participle ActiveNominative Masculine Singular
πίπτω: to fall Aorist participle. Luke alone records the posture; Ellicott notes that the falling on his face is peculiar to, and characteristic of, St. Luke, and explains the more general "worshipping" of St. Mark. The man cannot come close, so he goes down.
ἐπὶepivvvG1909
√ ἐπί — properly, meaning superimposition (of time, place, order, etcPreposition
πρόσωπονprosōponfacedownG4383
√ πρόσωπον — the front (as being towards view), iNounAccusative Neuter Singular
ἐδεήθηedeēthē[and] beggedG1189
√ δέομαι — to beg (as binding oneself), iVerbAorist Indicative Passive3rd Person Singular
δέομαι: to beg, to bind oneself in petition The verb of formal supplication, the one Luke uses for prayer to God (Luke 22:32, Acts 8:22). Coupled with Κύριε and the prostration, the request has the shape of worship before it has the shape of a medical appeal.
αὐτοῦautouHimG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounGenitive Masculine 3rd Person Singular
λέγωνlegōnG3004
√ λέγω — properly, to "lay" forth, iVerbPresent Participle ActiveNominative Masculine Singular
ΚύριεKyrieLordG2962
√ κύριος — supreme in authority, iNounVocative Masculine Singular
κύριος: lord, supreme in authority Vocative. On any reading it is at least deep respect; in Luke's vocabulary, where the same title runs through the Septuagint quotations of the first two chapters, it is the address a man uses when he has decided the only question left is what this person wants.
ἐὰνeanifG1437
√ ἐάν — a conditional particleConjunction
Conditional particle with the subjunctive; nothing is conceded about the outcome.
θέλῃςthelēsYou are willingG2309
√ θέλω — to determine (as an active option from subjective impulseVerbPresent Subjunctive Active2nd Person Singular
θέλω: to will, to determine from active choice Present subjunctive in a third class condition. Strong's glosses the root as determination from subjective impulse, an act of choice rather than mere wish. The leper puts the whole weight of his case on the choice of Jesus, and v. 13 will answer with the identical verb in the indicative.
δύνασαίdynasaiYou canG1410
√ δύναμαι — to be able or possibleVerbPresent Indicative Middle or Passive2nd Person Singular
δύναμαι: to be able, to have power Present indicative, unconditioned. Henry reads the pair exactly: strong confidence and deep humility are united in the words of this leper. The confidence is in the indicative, the humility in the subjunctive beside it.
καθαρίσαιkatharisaimake me cleanG2511
√ καθαρίζω — to cleanse (literally or figuratively)VerbAorist Infinitive Active
καθαρίζω: to cleanse Aorist infinitive. Not "heal" but "cleanse," the category of Leviticus: what the man wants is not primarily relief from symptoms but restoration to the camp, the congregation, and the sanctuary.
μεme. . .G1473
√ ἐγώ — I, mePersonal / Possessive PronounAccusative 1st Person Singular
13

Jesus reached out His hand and touched the man. “I am willing,” He said. “Be clean!” And immediately the leprosy left him.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

Kai ekteinas tēn cheira hēpsato autou Thelō legōn katharisthēti kai eutheōs hē lepra apēlthen ap’ autou

Word by word16 · parsed
ΚαὶKaiG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
ἐκτείναςekteinas[Jesus] reached outG1614
√ ἐκτείνω — to extendVerbAorist Participle ActiveNominative Masculine Singular
ἐκτείνω: to extend, to stretch out Aorist participle, a relatively uncommon verb (fourteen verses). The reaching precedes the touching as a separate act: there is distance to be crossed, and Jesus crosses it before he speaks.
τὴνtēn[His]G3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleAccusative Feminine Singular
χεῖραcheirahandG5495
√ χείρ — the hand (literally or figuratively (power)NounAccusative Feminine Singular
The hand; in biblical idiom also power, but here simply and physically the hand that no one else would extend.
ἥψατοhēpsato[and] touchedG680
√ ἅπτομαι — properly, to attach oneself to, iVerbAorist Indicative Middle3rd Person Singular
ἅπτομαι: to attach oneself to, to touch The scandal of the verse. Cambridge states it flatly: this was a distinct violation of the letter, but not of course of the spirit of the Mosaic law (Leviticus 13:46; Numbers 5:2). Under Leviticus 5:3 and Numbers 5:2-3 contact with the unclean transfers uncleanness outward; here the current runs the other way.
αὐτοῦautou[the man]G846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounGenitive Masculine 3rd Person Singular
ΘέλωThelōI am willingG2309
√ θέλω — to determine (as an active option from subjective impulseVerbPresent Indicative Active1st Person Singular
θέλω: to will, to determine The one word the whole unit turns on, and the only word in the exchange that is repeated verbatim by both speakers. The leper had located the question in the will of Jesus; Jesus answers by disclosing that will rather than by arguing about the power.
λέγωνlegōnHe saidG3004
√ λέγω — properly, to "lay" forth, iVerbPresent Participle ActiveNominative Masculine Singular
καθαρίσθητιkatharisthētiBe cleanG2511
√ καθαρίζω — to cleanse (literally or figuratively)VerbAorist Imperative Passive2nd Person Singular
καθαρίζω: to cleanse Aorist passive imperative. A command addressed to a condition, in the grammar of Genesis 1 rather than of medicine: the word does not request the change, it enacts it, and the next clause reports the result without any interval.
καὶkaiAndG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
Coordinating καί, joining word and result with nothing in between.
εὐθέωςeutheōsimmediatelyG2112
√ εὐθέως — directly, iAdverb
εὐθέως: directly, immediately Luke's note of instantaneity. It also explains the secrecy command that follows: Cambridge argues that the miracle had been so sudden and instantaneous that the crowd walking behind had not observed what took place.
theG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Feminine Singular
λέπραlepraleprosyG3014
√ λέπρα — scaliness, iNounNominative Feminine Singular
λέπρα: leprosy Nominative here, where in v. 12 it was genitive: the thing that defined the man is now the grammatical subject of its own departure.
ἀπῆλθενapēlthenleftG565
√ ἀπέρχομαι — to go off (iVerbAorist Indicative Active3rd Person Singular
ἀπέρχομαι: to go off, to depart A common verb (one hundred and sixteen verses) used here of a disease, which gives the sentence a quiet personification. Cambridge draws the exchange plainly: Jesus was not polluted by the touch, but the leper was cleansed.
ἀπ’ap’. . .G575
√ ἀπό — "off," iPreposition
αὐτοῦautouhimG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounGenitive Masculine 3rd Person Singular
14

“Do not tell anyone,” Jesus instructed him. “But go, show yourself to the priest and present the offering Moses prescribed for your cleansing, as a testimony to them.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

eipein mēdeni Kai autos parēngeilen autō Alla apelthōn deixon seauton tō hierei kai prosenenke kathōs Mōusēs prosetaxen peri sou tou katharismou eis martyrion autois

Word by word24 · parsed
εἰπεῖνeipein{Do not} tellG2036
√ ἔπω — to speak or say (by word or writing)VerbAorist Infinitive Active
μηδενὶmēdeni[anyone]G3367
√ μηδείς — not even one (man, woman, thing)AdjectiveDative Masculine Singular
μηδείς: not even one Absolute. Cambridge lists the ancient reasons for these silencings, from Chrysostom's pastoral one to the plainer one that Jesus did not wish His ministry to be accompanied by excitement and tumult.
ΚαὶKaiG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
αὐτὸςautos[Jesus]G846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounNominative Masculine 3rd Person Singular
παρήγγειλενparēngeileninstructedG3853
√ παραγγέλλω — to transmit a message, iVerbAorist Indicative Active3rd Person Singular
παραγγέλλω: to transmit a message, to charge The strong verb for a transmitted order. Mark preserves an even harsher form of it, and Cambridge cites it: violently enjoining him, immediately He thrust him forth.
αὐτῷautōhimG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounDative Masculine 3rd Person Singular
ἈλλὰAllaButG235
√ ἀλλά — properly, other things, iConjunction
ἀπελθὼνapelthōngoG565
√ ἀπέρχομαι — to go off (iVerbAorist Participle ActiveNominative Masculine Singular
Aorist participle of ἀπέρχομαι, the same verb used in v. 13 of the leprosy: it goes, and now he goes.
δεῖξονdeixonshowG1166
√ δεικνύω — to show (literally or figuratively)VerbAorist Imperative Active2nd Person Singular
δεικνύω: to show, to display Aorist imperative. The man must be seen, and seen by the one office competent to pronounce on him. Cambridge is exact: the priest alone could legally pronounce him clean.
σεαυτὸνseautonyourselfG4572
√ σεαυτοῦ — of (with, to) thyselfPersonal / Possessive PronounAccusative Masculine 2nd Person Singular
τῷto theG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleDative Masculine Singular
ἱερεῖhiereipriestG2409
√ ἱερεύς — a priest (literally or figuratively)NounDative Masculine Singular
ἱερεύς: a priest The hinge of the whole command. Jesus has done what only God does in the Old Testament, and then sends the evidence into the ordinary machinery of the Law, submitting the miracle to certification instead of publicity.
καὶkaiandG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
προσένεγκεprosenenkepresent the offeringG4374
√ προσφέρω — to bear towards, iVerbAorist Imperative Active2nd Person Singular
προσφέρω: to bear towards, to offer The sacrificial verb. What is to be brought is left unspecified because Leviticus 14 already specifies it: the two birds, the cedar and hyssop and scarlet yarn, and the eighth day offerings. Cambridge notes how heavy an expense the offering entailed.
καθὼςkathōsG2531
√ καθώς — just (or inasmuch) as, thatAdverb
ΜωϋσῆςMōusēsMosesG3475
√ Μωσεύς — Moseus, Moses, or Mouses (iNounNominative Masculine Singular
προσέταξενprosetaxenprescribedG4367
√ προστάσσω — to arrange towards, iVerbAorist Indicative Active3rd Person Singular
προστάσσω: to arrange towards, to prescribe A rare verb, seven verses, and in each one it marks an authoritative ordinance (Matthew 1:24; Mark 1:44; Acts 10:33). Jesus does not quote Moses word for word; he names him as the one who legislated, which is an appeal to the standing authority of the Law itself.
περὶperiforG4012
√ περί — properly, through (all over), iPreposition
σουsouyourG4771
√ σύ — thouPersonal / Possessive PronounGenitive 2nd Person Singular
τοῦtouG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleGenitive Masculine Singular
καθαρισμοῦkatharismoucleansingG2512
√ καθαρισμός — a washing off, iNounGenitive Masculine Singular
καθαρισμός: a washing off, purification The rite, not the event. The man has been made clean by a word; he is now told to walk through the whole eight day ceremony anyway, which means the Law is not being abolished at the moment it is being transcended.
εἰςeisasG1519
√ εἰς — to or into (indicating the point reached or entered), of place, time, or (figuratively) purpose (result, etcPreposition
μαρτύριονmartyriona testimonyG3142
√ μαρτύριον — something evidential, iNounAccusative Neuter Singular
μαρτύριον: something evidential, a testimony The sense of the dative αὐτοῖς is disputed. Cambridge takes it here as evidence for the priests, that they may assure themselves the miracle is real, while noting that at Luke 9:5 and Mark 6:11 the same phrase means a witness against them. We do not resolve it; the verse will bear both, and the ambiguity is in the Greek, not only in the English.
αὐτοῖςautoisto themG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounDative Masculine 3rd Person Plural
15

But the news about Jesus spread all the more, and great crowds came to hear Him and to be healed of their sicknesses.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

de ho logos peri autou Diērcheto mallon kai polloi ochloi synērchonto akouein kai therapeuesthai apo autōn tōn astheneiōn

Word by word18 · parsed
δὲdeButG1161
√ δέ — but, and, etcConjunction
hotheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Singular
λόγοςlogosnewsG3056
√ λόγος — something said (including the thought)NounNominative Masculine Singular
λόγος: something said, a word, an account Luke's noun for the preached message is here the noun for gossip about a miracle. The unit is quietly setting the two against each other, and Geneva reads the contrast the same way.
περὶperiaboutG4012
√ περί — properly, through (all over), iPreposition
αὐτοῦautou[Jesus]G846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounGenitive Masculine 3rd Person Singular
ΔιήρχετοDiērchetospreadG1330
√ διέρχομαι — to traverse (literally)VerbImperfect Indicative Middle or Passive3rd Person Singular
διέρχομαι: to traverse, to pass through Imperfect middle. A verb Luke normally uses of missionaries moving through regions; here the report travels the roads instead of the man who was told to be silent.
μᾶλλονmallonall the moreG3123
√ μᾶλλον — (adverbially) more (in a greater degree)) or ratherAdverb
μᾶλλον: more, rather The comparative that makes the irony explicit. The command to silence in v. 14 is the direct cause of the increase: so much the more.
καὶkaiandG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
πολλοὶpolloigreatG4183
√ πολύς — (singular) much (in any respect) or (plural) manyAdjectiveNominative Masculine Plural
ὄχλοιochloicrowdsG3793
√ ὄχλος — a throng (as borne along)NounNominative Masculine Plural
ὄχλος: a throng, a crowd borne along Plural with πολλοί. The one man who had to stand outside the town has been replaced by crowds that make the town impossible for Jesus.
συνήρχοντοsynērchontocameG4905
√ συνέρχομαι — to convene, depart in company with, associate with, or (specially), cohabit (conjugally)VerbImperfect Indicative Middle or Passive3rd Person Plural
συνέρχομαι: to convene, to come together Imperfect, repeated action, the counterweight to the imperfect of v. 16: they kept converging, he kept withdrawing.
ἀκούεινakoueinto hear [Him]G191
√ ἀκούω — to hear (in various senses)VerbPresent Infinitive Active
ἀκούω: to hear Present infinitive of purpose, and Luke puts it first, before healing. Whether the crowds shared that order of priorities is exactly what Geneva doubts.
καὶkaiandG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
θεραπεύεσθαιtherapeuesthaito be healedG2323
√ θεραπεύω — to wait upon menially, iVerbPresent Infinitive Middle or Passive
θεραπεύω: to wait upon, to treat, to heal Present passive infinitive, continuous. Cambridge judges that the crowds were thus in part defeating our Lord's purpose, which is a commentator's verdict rather than a statement of Luke's.
ἀπὸapoofG575
√ ἀπό — "off," iPreposition
αὐτῶνautōntheirG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounGenitive Masculine 3rd Person Plural
τῶνtōnG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleGenitive Feminine Plural
ἀσθενειῶνastheneiōnsicknessesG769
√ ἀσθένεια — feebleness (of mind or body)NounGenitive Feminine Plural
ἀσθένεια: feebleness of mind or body Weaknesses rather than named diseases, a general word covering everything the crowd brought, and pointedly not the word λέπρα that the single man brought.
16

Yet He frequently withdrew to the wilderness to pray.

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

de autos ēn hypochōrōn en tais erēmois kai proseuchomenos

Word by word9 · parsed
δὲdeYetG1161
√ δέ — but, and, etcConjunction
αὐτὸςautosHeG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounNominative Masculine 3rd Person Singular
ἦνēnfrequentlyG1510
√ εἰμί — I exist (used only when emphatic)VerbImperfect Indicative Active3rd Person Singular
εἰμί: to be Imperfect, and the load bearing word of the verse: with the two participles it builds a periphrastic imperfect, the Greek way of saying that something was a man's practice and not his emergency.
ὑποχωρῶνhypochōrōnwithdrewG5298
√ ὑποχωρέω — to vacate down, iVerbPresent Participle ActiveNominative Masculine Singular
ὑποχωρέω: to vacate, to withdraw A rare verb, standing in only two verses of the Greek New Testament, and both are Luke's (here and Luke 9:10). It is Luke's own vocabulary for the deliberate retreat of Jesus from success, and the Verifier's candidate list confirms the pair.
ἐνentoG1722
√ ἐν — "in," at, (up-)on, by, etcPreposition
ταῖςtaistheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleDative Feminine Plural
ἐρήμοιςerēmoiswildernessG2048
√ ἔρημος — desert, desolate, solitary, wildernessAdjectiveDative Feminine Plural
ἔρημος: desert, desolate, solitary Dative plural. The leper had been sentenced by Leviticus 13:46 to dwell alone outside the camp; by the end of the unit the man is inside and Jesus is the one in the desolate places. Cambridge, without drawing that conclusion, calls the retirement a sort of Levitical quarantine.
καὶkaitoG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
προσευχόμενοςproseuchomenosprayG4336
√ προσεύχομαι — to pray to God, iVerbPresent Participle Middle or PassiveNominative Masculine Singular
προσεύχομαι: to pray to God Present participle. Ellicott notes that the addition that he was praying is peculiar to St. Luke, who throughout his Gospel lays stress on this feature. Luke supplies no content for the prayer; Gill lists what Jesus prayed for elsewhere and admits plainly that what he now prayed for is not known. We follow Gill's restraint.

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. Full of leprosy: a man already reckoned dead — Luke 5:12

⚙ Luke opens with the Greek Old Testament's own cadence, καὶ ἐγένετο ἐν τῷ εἶναι αὐτόν, and then puts into that cadence a person Leviticus had written out of the community. Cambridge, who supplies the fullest description in our sources, calls the condition a living death, indicated by bare head, rent clothes, and covered lip, and notes that the expression full of implies the rapid development and horror of the disease. Gill, whose long clinical catalogue our brief caps, draws his own conclusion from it: between this disease and sin, he says, there is a very great likeness, since under the ceremonial law it was considered rather as an uncleanness than as a disease. Pulpit adds the staging: such men were not allowed to appear in the ordinary haunts of men, so this one had apparently eluded observation. ⚙ The grammar of his petition is the sharpest thing in the verse and belongs to no commentator: δύνασαί is a bare indicative, ἐὰν θέλῃς a third class subjunctive. He has already settled the power and staked everything on the will. Henry states the same thing without the grammar: strong confidence and deep humility are united in the words of this leper. Cambridge supplies the reason such confidence was extraordinary, counting that hitherto there had been but one instance of a leper cleansed by miracle, and pointing to Luke 4:27 and 2 Kings 5.

ii. The hand and the word: the current reverses — Luke 5:13

⚙ Two things happen that the Law did not provide for. First the hand: ἥψατο is middle voice, he attached himself to him, and Cambridge calls it a distinct violation of the letter, but not of course of the spirit of the Mosaic law, citing Leviticus 13:46 and Numbers 5:2. Pulpit, quoting Ambrose, presses it further: Jesus, because he is the Lord of the Law, does not obey the Law, but makes the Law, and Pulpit adds Farrar's gloss about a divine eternal law of compassion older and grander than the written Law. ⚙ We hold that claim carefully. It is about authority, not abolition, and v. 14 proves the point, because the same mouth that touches the man sends him straight to the priest. Second the word: the leper's θέλῃς comes back as Θέλω, the identical lexeme with the condition stripped off, which Cambridge describes as a prompt echo to the ripe faith of the leper. Then καθαρίσθητι, an aorist passive imperative: be cleansed, with nothing for the man to do. Gill records the motive as compassion and commiseration of his sad case; Cambridge records the result in the one sentence the whole unit turns on, that Jesus was not polluted by the touch, but the leper was cleansed. Under Leviticus 5:3 and Numbers 5:2-3 contact carries uncleanness outward from the leper. Here it runs backward, and Cambridge, citing H. de St Victore, already reads that as a type of Christ taking our humanity upon him and remaining undefiled.

iii. To the priest, and out to the desolate places — Luke 5:14-16

⚙ The command is double and exact. Silence, in the strong verb παρήγγειλεν; then a journey to the one office that could certify him, because, as Cambridge puts it, the priest alone could legally pronounce him clean. προσέταξεν (a rare verb, seven verses) names Moses as legislator rather than quoting him, and καθαρισμοῦ (also rare, seven verses) names the completed rite of Leviticus 14, which Cambridge urges the student to read for himself and whose cost he notes was heavy. ⚙ So the miracle is submitted to the Law rather than set against it, and the man who was cleansed by a word must still walk the eight days, the birds, the cedar and hyssop and scarlet yarn. What εἰς μαρτύριον αὐτοῖς means is genuinely open: Cambridge takes it as evidence to the priests that the miracle is real, while noting that the same phrase elsewhere in Luke means witness against. Then the reversal completes itself. Ellicott observes that the verbs of v. 15 are in the tense that implies continuous action; the report keeps travelling and the crowds keep converging, and Cambridge judges plainly that the leper disobeyed his strict injunction, disobedience natural, and perhaps venial; but certainly not commendable. Geneva reads the consequence theologically: Christ would rather be well known by his doctrine than by miracles. Henry, on the same verse, draws the opposite application, commending us to spread abroad Christ's fame; we let the two stand against each other. ⚙ And the verse that closes the unit closes the exchange: the periphrastic imperfect ἦν ὑποχωρῶν, matched to the imperfects of v. 15, in the plural ἐρήμοις. The man Leviticus 13:46 had sentenced to dwell alone outside is now inside the town; Jesus is outside it. Benson says the grammar implies that he frequently did this and that though no one was ever more busily employed, he found time for pious and devout retirement. Poole presses the example: Christ had no idle hours, he was always either preaching or healing, or praying. Ellicott notes that the praying is peculiar to St. Luke.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ Read only from the text, the unit is about what the Law could diagnose and could not do. Leviticus 13 gives a priest the competence to declare a man unclean and Leviticus 14 gives him a rite to perform once someone else has made the man clean, but the Law never provides a means of cleansing; in the whole Old Testament leprosy is removed only when God removes it, for Miriam at Numbers 12 and for Naaman at 2 Kings 5, which is why the king of Israel tore his clothes and said: Am I God, to kill and to make alive, that this man sends to me to cure a man of his leprosy. That is the question this passage places in front of the reader, and the passage answers it without a word of argument: a hand, a single verb in the first person, and a passive imperative. We would say further, and offer it to be tested: the leper had located the question correctly. He never asked whether Jesus could; he asked what Jesus wanted. The gospel here is not a demonstration of power, since he already conceded that, but a disclosure of will, and the disclosure costs Jesus the town. He goes where the leper had been, and the leper goes where Jesus had been. Nothing in Luke says that trade was deliberate, so we do not claim it as Luke's point; we only observe that Luke reports both movements in matched imperfects and lets them stand side by side. The commentators divide on the leper's publicity, Henry commending it and Cambridge calling it disobedience, and we do not think the text settles it. What the text does settle is that the man was told to go to the priest, and that the one who healed him refused to let the healing become the message.

He never doubted the power; he asked only for the will, and the will is what Jesus gave him. (An interpretive line from this commentary, not a verse of Scripture.)

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

What Moses prescribed: the whole rite of the cleansed leper structural / thematic: confirmed

⚙ Jesus does not quote the Law here, he invokes it by its author: καθὼς προσέταξεν Μωϋσῆς, just as Moses prescribed. The legislation referred to is Leviticus 14:2-32, the ceremony for the day of the leper's cleansing: the two living birds, the cedar wood and scarlet yarn and hyssop, the shaving and washing, and the offerings of the eighth day. The isolation the man had been living under is Leviticus 13:45-46, torn clothes, unkempt hair, covered lip, the cry Unclean, unclean, and dwelling alone outside the camp. Cambridge urges the reader to study the rites for himself and observes from Leviticus 14:4-10 how heavy an expense the offering entailed; he also records that the priest alone could legally pronounce the man clean, which is the whole reason for the errand.

Leviticus 14:2-32 · Leviticus 13:45-46

basis: Cross-Testament link (Greek Gospel to Hebrew Torah), so no shared Strong's lexeme is possible and the cross-Testament rule forbids a verbal tier. The recorded basis is the text's own explicit appeal to named legislation: Jesus cites Moses as legislator (G4367 προστάσσω, rare, in 7 vv) rather than reproducing any wording of Leviticus, so this is an appeal to the Law, not a quotation of it.

Am I God, to kill and to make alive: the only precedents are God's own acts structural / thematic: confirmed

⚙ In the Old Testament leprosy is cleansed exactly twice, and God does it both times: Miriam at Numbers 12:10-15, shut outside the camp seven days after Moses cries for her healing, and Naaman at 2 Kings 5:1-14. The king of Israel's reaction at 2 Kings 5:7, tearing his clothes and asking whether he is God, to kill and to make alive, that this man sends to him to cure a man of his leprosy, is precisely the question raised by Luke 5:13, and Luke raises it without comment. Cambridge, counting the same precedents, notes that the leper's faith must have been intense because hitherto there had been but one instance of a leper cleansed by miracle, and he sends the reader to Luke 4:27 and 2 Kings 5. ⚙ We state the inference and mark it as ours: the passage puts Jesus in the position the king of Israel said belonged to God alone, and Luke lets the grammar do it rather than a title.

2 Kings 5:7 · 2 Kings 5:1-14 · Numbers 12:10-15 · Luke 4:27

basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew) for the Kings and Numbers refs, so no shared Strong's lexeme exists and the cross-Testament rule forbids a verbal tier; the basis is the shared narrative pattern of leprosy removed only by direct divine act, which Cambridge records at Luke 5:12 by citing Luke 4:27 and 2 Kings 5. The Luke 4:27 ref is Greek to Greek but is included here as the commentator's own cross-reference, not as a lexeme match from the Verifier.

Contact that runs the wrong way typological

⚙ Leviticus 5:3 makes touching human uncleanness a guilt-bearing act, and Numbers 5:2-3 puts the leper outside the camp precisely so that contact cannot happen. In Luke 5:13 the contact happens and the transfer reverses: ἥψατο (middle voice, he attached himself to him) is followed not by defilement but by ἡ λέπρα ἀπῆλθεν. Cambridge calls this a distinct violation of the letter, but not of course of the spirit of the Mosaic law, and states the reversal directly: Jesus was not polluted by the touch, but the leper was cleansed. Citing H. de St Victore, he reads the touching as a type of Christ taking our humanity upon him and remaining undefiled, which makes this a figural reading with ancient standing rather than a modern one.

Leviticus 5:3 · Numbers 5:2-3 · Leviticus 13:46

basis: A figural reading, and an ancient and widely-held one: Cambridge attributes it to H. de St Victore and Pulpit reports Ambrose to the same effect. Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so no shared lexeme can be computed and no verbal tier is available; the basis is the legal rule of transferred uncleanness being visibly inverted by the narrative.

If You are willing: the willingness of the God who heals structural / thematic: confirmed

⚙ The leper's whole question is volitional, and Psalm 103:3 is the standing scriptural answer to it: the LORD who forgives all your iniquities and heals all your diseases, with forgiveness and healing named in one breath, as this episode names cleansing and restoration in one act. The contrast with Naaman is instructive in reverse: at 2 Kings 5:11 Naaman was angry because Elisha did not come out and wave his hand over the place, expecting a gesture and receiving a bare command; here the leper expects nothing but a decision and receives both the gesture and the word.

Psalm 103:3 · 2 Kings 5:11

basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's numbers cannot be computed and the verbal tier is unavailable by rule. The basis is a shared motif, the divine will to heal as the thing at issue, plus a deliberate narrative contrast with 2 Kings 5:11. No quotation is claimed; the Psalm is not cited by Luke and the connection is editorial.

λέπρα in four verses: the synoptic report of one touch verbal / quotation: confirmed

⚙ The noun λέπρα occurs in only four verses of the Greek New Testament, and the Verifier's top two candidates for this unit are two of them. Matthew 8:3 and Mark 1:41-42 tell the same episode with the same rare vocabulary: the stretching out of the hand, θέλω, καθαρίζω, and the leprosy departing. Cambridge remarks that the two words in the original are accurately preserved by all three Evangelists, and Ellicott, Barnes, JFB and Poole all simply refer the reader from Luke to Matthew 8:2-4.

Matthew 8:3 · Mark 1:41 · Mark 1:42

basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G3014 λέπρα (in 4 vv, rare), G2511 καθαρίζω (in 30 vv), G2309 θέλω (in 199 vv), G1614 ἐκτείνω (in 14 vv), G565 ἀπέρχομαι (in 116 vv). Candidate scores Matthew 8:3 at 0.70, Mark 1:42 at 0.60, Mark 1:41 at 0.18. All refs are New Testament Greek, so the cross-Testament rule does not apply.

προστάσσω: the rare verb of an ordinance given verbal / quotation: confirmed

προσέταξεν is rare, seven verses in all, and every occurrence marks an authoritative ordinance being obeyed: Joseph doing as the angel of the Lord prescribed at Matthew 1:24, Cornelius at Acts 10:33 saying the household is present to hear all that has been prescribed by the Lord, and Peter at Acts 10:48 prescribing baptism. Here it stands with ἱερεῖ and προσένεγκε, the same triple that the Verifier finds at Mark 1:44 and Matthew 8:4, the synoptic parallels to this very command.

Mark 1:44 · Matthew 8:4 · Acts 10:33 · Matthew 1:24

basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G4367 προστάσσω (in 7 vv, rare), G2409 ἱερεύς (in 31 vv), G4374 προσφέρω (in 45 vv); candidate scores Mark 1:44 at 0.48, Matthew 8:4 at 0.33, Acts 10:33 at 0.15, Matthew 1:24 at 0.14. All refs are New Testament Greek, so no cross-Testament restriction applies.

καθαρισμός: the rite word, from the temple to the cross verbal / quotation: confirmed

⚙ The noun καθαρισμός (a completed purification, as distinct from the verb of cleansing in v. 13) stands in seven verses. Luke uses it once before, at Luke 2:22, for the days of purification according to the Law of Moses when the infant Jesus is brought to the temple; John 2:6 uses it of the stone jars set for the purification of the Jews; Hebrews 1:3 uses it for the Son having made purification for sins before he sat down; and 2 Peter 1:9 uses it of the cleansing from a believer's former sins, now forgotten. ⚙ We note the trajectory of the one word and claim nothing more from it: Luke reports the vocabulary, he does not draw the line.

Luke 2:22 · John 2:6 · Hebrews 1:3 · 2 Peter 1:9

basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G2512 καθαρισμός (in 7 vv, rare); candidate scores Luke 2:22 at 0.16, John 3:25 at 0.15, John 2:6 at 0.14, 2 Peter 1:9 at 0.14, Hebrews 1:3 at 0.14. The verbal tier records the shared rare lexeme only; no claim is made that any of these passages quotes another. All refs are New Testament Greek.

ὑποχωρέω: the verb Luke uses twice and no one else uses at all verbal / quotation: confirmed

ὑποχωρέω, to vacate or withdraw, stands in two verses of the Greek New Testament, here and Luke 9:10, where Jesus takes the returning apostles and withdraws privately to a town called Bethsaida and the crowds follow him there too. Both are Luke's, both follow a surge of public success, and both are immediately overtaken by the crowd. Cambridge calls the retirement here a sort of Levitical quarantine which the multitudes disregarded as soon as they discovered where he was; Ellicott stresses that the praying is peculiar to St. Luke throughout his Gospel.

Luke 9:10

basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G5298 ὑποχωρέω (in 2 vv, the rarest lexeme in this unit) and G4172 πόλις (in 155 vv); candidate score 0.51. Both refs are Lukan Greek, so no cross-Testament restriction applies. The verbal link is lexical and authorial, not a quotation.

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

I am willing: the will of God spoken in the first person ancient/widely-held

⚙ The single most loaded word in the unit is a verb of volition used twice, once as a question and once as an answer. The leper conceded the power and asked only about the will, and Jesus answers with Θέλω, his own bare indicative. Cambridge describes it as a prompt echo to the ripe faith of the leper, accurately preserved by all three Evangelists. Under the Law only God cleanses leprosy (Numbers 12:13-15; 2 Kings 5:7, where the king protests that only God kills and makes alive), so the question Am I God is being answered by a man stretching out his hand. Henry states the pastoral form of the same reading: if any sinner asks whether the Lord will look upon such a one, the answer is yes, he will. Geneva states the doctrinal form: that Christ, by healing the leper with only his touch and sending him to the priest, witnesses that it is he through whom all we who are unclean according to the law are pronounced pure and clean by the witness of God himself. Psalm 103:3 had already joined forgiving iniquity and healing diseases in one line; here the two are done in one act.

Matthew 8:3 · Mark 1:41 · Psalm 103:3 · 2 Kings 5:7

The touch that is not defiled: the exchange in miniature ancient/widely-held

⚙ Every law of contact in Leviticus 5:3 and Numbers 5:2-3 runs one direction, from the unclean to the clean. Luke reports the direction reversed in a single sentence, and the ancient reading of that reversal is already in our sources. Cambridge, citing H. de St Victore, says His touching the leper, yet remaining clean, is a type of His taking our humanity upon Him, remaining undefiled, and adds that even so he touched our sinful nature yet without sin. Pulpit, quoting Ambrose, grounds the authority behind it: Jesus, because he is the Lord of the Law, does not obey the Law, but makes the Law. ⚙ We add only the qualifier the passage itself supplies: this is not the Law set aside, because the next thing Jesus does is send the man to the priest with the offering Moses prescribed. The touch does not abolish Leviticus; it does what Leviticus could not do and then submits the result to Leviticus for certification. Hebrews 4:15 and 2 Corinthians 5:21 name the same pattern in doctrinal language.

Leviticus 5:3 · Numbers 5:2-3 · 2 Corinthians 5:21 · Hebrews 4:15

The places traded: he goes in, and Jesus goes outside novel

⚙ This reading is our own and we mark it as such. Leviticus 13:46 sentences the leper to dwell alone, his dwelling outside the camp. By Luke 5:15 the man is inside the towns and the report about Jesus is going everywhere; by Luke 5:16 Jesus is in the desolate places, and Luke marks the two motions with matched imperfects, συνήρχοντο against ἦν ὑποχωρῶν. Mark 1:45 makes the practical cause explicit, that Jesus could no longer enter a town openly. Cambridge comes closest to the observation when he calls the retirement a sort of Levitical quarantine, but he draws no conclusion from it, and Luke draws none either. ⚙ We offer the pattern to be tested against Hebrews 13:12-13, where Jesus suffers outside the gate and the readers are called to go out to him there. The vocabulary is not shared and the connection is thematic; the exchange of places may be Luke's design or may be nothing more than the consequence of crowds, and we do not claim to know which.

Leviticus 13:46 · Mark 1:45 · Hebrews 13:12-13

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

Text: BSB (CC0) with the Berean interlinear and Strong's numbers; parses, glosses and lexeme frequencies are taken from the supplied brief and not recomputed here.

Sources actually usable at this passage are fewer than the author list suggests. Barnes, JFB and (for vv. 12 to 15) Poole do not comment on Luke here at all; each simply refers the reader to Matthew 8:2-4 or Mark 1:45, so no substantive quotation from them exists to cite, and we have not cited them rather than pad the apparatus. Poole is quoted only at v. 16, where he does write at length. Gill's note on v. 12 is capped in our brief after a long clinical description of ancient leprosy drawn from Galen, Aretaeus and others; we quote only the theological conclusion that follows it and have not opened the remainder, so nothing in this synthesis depends on the capped text.

Cross-reference provenance: the Verifier's candidate list for this Greek unit contains only Greek texts, so every Old Testament link in the threads above (Leviticus 13 and 14, Leviticus 5:3, Numbers 5 and 12, 2 Kings 5, Psalm 103) is editorial, established by the passage's own explicit appeal to what Moses prescribed and by the shared subject matter, not by any computed lexeme match. Greek to Hebrew links cannot share Strong's numbers, so none of them is tiered verbal. Only the Greek to Greek threads carry the verbal tier, and there it records nothing more than a shared rare lexeme, never a claim that one passage quotes another.

Genuinely uncertain in this unit: the sense of εἰς μαρτύριον αὐτοῖς in v. 14, which Cambridge reads as evidence for the priests while noting the same phrase means witness against them at Luke 9:5 and Mark 6:11; the reason for the command to silence, for which Chrysostom, Cambridge and Pulpit each supply a different motive and Luke supplies none; the moral status of the leper's publicity, on which Henry and Cambridge flatly disagree; the location, which Cambridge and Pulpit place at Hattin on the strength of Matthew 8:1 while Poole says there is no certainty of that; and the content of the prayer in v. 16, which Gill concedes is not known. The third christ entry (the exchange of places) is our own reading and is marked novel.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)