The Fallible Study Bible

The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible

Luke5:33–35

Questions about Fasting

Public-domain source — quoted & attributed AI synthesis — generated, verify

Luke 5:33–35 — Questions about Fasting. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.

33

Then they said to Him, “John’s disciples and those of the Pharisees frequently fast and pray, but Yours keep on eating and drinking.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

de Hoi eipan pros auton Iōannou Hoi mathētai homoiōs kai hoi tōn Pharisaiōn pykna nēsteuousin kai poiountai deēseis de hoi soi esthiousin kai pinousin

Word by word24 · parsed
δὲdeThenG1161
√ δέ — but, and, etcConjunction
ΟἱHoiG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Plural
εἶπανeipanthey saidG2036
√ ἔπω — to speak or say (by word or writing)VerbAorist Indicative Active3rd Person Plural
πρὸςprostoG4314
√ πρός — a preposition of directionPreposition
αὐτόνautonHimG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounAccusative Masculine 3rd Person Singular
ἸωάννουIōannouJohn’sG2491
√ Ἰωάννης — Joannes (iNounGenitive Masculine Singular
ΟἱHoiG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Plural
μαθηταὶmathētaidisciplesG3101
√ μαθητής — a learner, iNounNominative Masculine Plural
ὁμοίωςhomoiōsvvvG3668
√ ὁμοίως — similarlyAdverb
homoiōs: similarly, likewise The hinge that yokes two parties who otherwise had little in common. Luke leaves the questioners unnamed; Mark 2:18 names John's disciples and the Pharisees together, and this adverb is where Luke's sentence silently joins them.
καὶkaiandG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
οἱhoithoseG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Plural
τῶνtōnof theG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleGenitive Masculine Plural
ΦαρισαίωνPharisaiōnPhariseesG5330
√ Φαρισαῖος — a separatist, iNounGenitive Masculine Plural
πυκνὰpyknafrequentlyG4437
√ πυκνός — clasped (thick), iAdjectiveAccusative Neuter Plural
pyknos: thick, close-packed, hence frequent A genuinely rare word, standing in three New Testament verses only (here, Acts 24:26 of Felix sending often for Paul, 1 Timothy 5:23 of Timothy's frequent infirmities). Its density is the point of the complaint: not that fasting happens but that it happens thickly, at set and countable intervals. Cambridge notes the Pharisaic boast of Luke 18:12 behind it.
νηστεύουσινnēsteuousinfastG3522
√ νηστεύω — to abstain from food (religiously)VerbPresent Indicative Active3rd Person Plural
nēsteuō: to abstain from food religiously Present indicative active, habitual. The Law appointed one fast in the year, the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 16:29 to 31; Leviticus 23:27 to 32); Pulpit records that four annual fasts were added after the Exile and that the prophets gave them no sanction (Zechariah 7:1 to 12; Zechariah 8:19), and that in our Lord's day rigid Jews fasted twice a week. The verb here therefore names an observance grown far past its one commanded instance.
καὶkaiandG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
ποιοῦνταιpoiountaivvvG4160
√ ποιέω — to make or do (in a very wide application, more or less direct)VerbPresent Indicative Middle3rd Person Plural
poieō: to make, to do Present indicative middle. With δεήσεις it forms a periphrasis, they-make-petitions-for-themselves, the idiom Luke also uses at Luke 18:1 and Philippians 1:4 of praying. The middle voice is quietly telling: the prayers are reflexively theirs, something performed and possessed, which is the very thing the complaint is proud of.
δεήσειςdeēseisprayG1162
√ δέησις — a petitionNounAccusative Feminine Plural
deēsis: a petition, a supplication out of need Not the general word for prayer (proseuchē) but the narrower word for a request born of lack. Cambridge, the evangelist of prayer, preserves this word alone among the Gospels and thinks the accent falls on much speaking rather than on prayer as such. The irony is exact: petitions of need are being urged against the one company that presently has no lack, because the Bridegroom is at table with them.
δὲdebutG1161
√ δέ — but, and, etcConjunction
οἱhoiG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Plural
σοὶsoiYoursG4674
√ σός — thinePersonal / Possessive PronounNominative Masculine 2nd Person Plural
sos: thine The pronoun that turns a survey of religious custom into an accusation. Geneva reads the whole complaint as hypocrites and ignorant men making a matter of holiness out of unimportant things; the ownership marked by this single word is what makes the charge stick to Jesus rather than to His disciples.
ἐσθίουσινesthiousinkeep on eatingG2068
√ ἐσθίω — used only in certain tenses, the rest being supplied by G5315 (φάγω)VerbPresent Indicative Active3rd Person Plural
esthiō: to eat Paired with pinō (G4095), eating and drinking is the standing biblical shorthand for festal ordinary life, and in this Gospel it is the charge that follows Jesus from Levi's banquet (Luke 5:29) to Luke 7:34, where He is called a glutton and a drunkard. Benson hears the sting: thine eat and drink freely, though thou professest a high degree of righteousness.
καὶkaiandG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
πίνουσινpinousindrinkingG4095
√ πίνω — to imbibe (literally or figuratively)VerbPresent Indicative Active3rd Person Plural
34

Jesus replied, “Can you make the guests of the bridegroom fast while He is with them?

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

de Iēsous Ho eipen pros autous Mē dynasthe poiēsai tous huious tou nymphōnos nēsteusai en hō ho nymphios estin met’ autōn

Word by word21 · parsed
δὲdeG1161
√ δέ — but, and, etcConjunction
ἸησοῦςIēsousJesusG2424
√ Ἰησοῦς — Jesus (iNounNominative Masculine Singular
HoG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Singular
εἶπενeipenrepliedG2036
√ ἔπω — to speak or say (by word or writing)VerbAorist Indicative Active3rd Person Singular
πρὸςpros. . .G4314
√ πρός — a preposition of directionPreposition
αὐτούςautous. . .G846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounAccusative Masculine 3rd Person Plural
ΜὴvvvG3361
√ μή — (adverb) not, (conjunction) lestAdverb
mē: not (interrogative particle) Grammatically it is the whole argument in one syllable. A question framed with μή anticipates the answer No, so Jesus does not debate whether His disciples should fast; He asks a question no one at a wedding could answer Yes to. Ellicott observes that Luke's form of the question is stronger than the parallels in Matthew and Mark.
δύνασθεdynastheCan youG1410
√ δύναμαι — to be able or possibleVerbPresent Indicative Middle or Passive2nd Person Plural
dynamai: to be able, to be possible Present middle or passive, second person plural. The verb is one of possibility, not permission. Geneva presses exactly here: laws generally made without consideration of circumstances are not only tyrannous but harmful to the Church.
ποιῆσαιpoiēsaimakeG4160
√ ποιέω — to make or do (in a very wide application, more or less direct)VerbAorist Infinitive Active
τοὺςtoustheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleAccusative Masculine Plural
υἱοὺςhuiousguestsG5207
√ υἱός — a "son" (sometimes of animals), used very widely of immediate, remote or figuratively, kinshipNounAccusative Masculine Plural
huios: son A Hebraism carried into Greek, sons of the bridal chamber meaning those who belong to the wedding. Cambridge identifies them with the paranymphs, the bridegroom's friends who went out to meet the bride, and notes that John's own disciples had heard their master call himself the friend of the bridegroom who rejoices at his voice (John 3:29). The image was therefore aimed straight at the questioners.
τοῦtouof theG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleGenitive Masculine Singular
νυμφῶνοςnymphōnosbridegroomG3567
√ νυμφών — the bridal roomNounGenitive Masculine Singular
nymphōn: the bridal chamber The room, not the person. Its rarity matters: the whole scene is conjured by one architectural noun, and a fast inside a wedding hall is a contradiction in terms rather than a sin. Gill draws the conclusion the grammar permits, that Christ is signifying He is the bridegroom and His disciples the children of the bride chamber.
νηστεῦσαιnēsteusaifastG3522
√ νηστεύω — to abstain from food (religiously)VerbAorist Infinitive Active
nēsteuō: to fast (aorist infinitive) The aorist looks at fasting as a single act that could be imposed, not the habitual present of verse 33. Jesus does not deny that fasting has a place; He denies that this is its hour. Matthew 9:15 uses mourn where Luke has fast, and Cambridge notes that the substitution sharpens the antithesis with John 16:20, where sorrow turns to joy.
ἐνenvvvG1722
√ ἐν — "in," at, (up-)on, by, etcPreposition
whileG3739
√ ὅς — the relatively (sometimes demonstrative) pronoun, who, which, what, thatPersonal / Relative PronounDative Masculine Singular
hoG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Singular
νυμφίοςnymphios[He]G3566
√ νυμφίος — a bride-groom (literally or figuratively)NounNominative Masculine Singular
nymphios: bridegroom The load-bearing word of the unit. In the prophets the bridegroom of Israel is the LORD Himself (Isaiah 54:5 to 6; Isaiah 62:5; Hosea 2:16 to 20), and Jesus takes the role without argument or explanation. Pulpit says the imagery is drawn from Hosea 2:19, 20 and perhaps Psalm 45 and the Song of Songs, and that Jesus here clearly regards Himself as the Christ.
ἐστινestinisG1510
√ εἰμί — I exist (used only when emphatic)VerbPresent Indicative Active3rd Person Singular
eimi: to be Present indicative, and everything turns on that tense. The disciples' freedom is not a doctrine about fasting, it is the presence of a person, stated as a bare fact of the current moment: the bridegroom is with them. Verse 35 will change nothing but this verb's tense.
μετ’met’withG3326
√ μετά — properly, denoting accompanimentPreposition
αὐτῶνautōnthemG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounGenitive Masculine 3rd Person Plural
35

But the time will come when the bridegroom will be taken from them; then they will fast.”

Berean Standard Bible · CC0

Greek — tap a word ↓

de hēmerai eleusontai kai hotan ho nymphios aparthē ap’ autōn tote en ekeinais tais hēmerais nēsteusousin

Word by word16 · parsed
δὲdeButG1161
√ δέ — but, and, etcConjunction
ἡμέραιhēmerai[the] timeG2250
√ ἡμέρα — day, iNounNominative Feminine Plural
hēmera: day Plural and indefinite, in the prophetic idiom of days that come (Jeremiah 7:32; Amos 8:11). Luke's Jesus does not date the change, He announces it as a season with a shape, and the same noun returns in the last clause to close the bracket.
ἐλεύσονταιeleusontaiwill comeG2064
√ ἔρχομαι — to come or go (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively)VerbFuture Indicative Middle3rd Person Plural
erchomai: to come Future middle. The days are not sent for, they arrive. Poole reads this soberly: He was now with them, and when He should be gone from them, before which it would not be long, they should have time to mourn.
καὶkaiG2532
√ καί — and, also, even, so then, too, etcConjunction
ὅτανhotanwhenG3752
√ ὅταν — whenever (implying hypothesis or more or less uncertainty)Conjunction
hotan: whenever, when (with the subjunctive) The particle takes a subjunctive and marks the event as certain in kind but unfixed in date. Cambridge prefers the reading and when (καὶ, with A, B, D) over but, which joins the removal to the coming days rather than setting it against them.
hotheG3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleNominative Masculine Singular
νυμφίοςnymphiosbridegroomG3566
√ νυμφίος — a bride-groom (literally or figuratively)NounNominative Masculine Singular
ἀπαρθῇaparthēwill be takenG522
√ ἀπαίρω — to lift off, iVerbAorist Subjunctive Passive3rd Person Singular
apairō: to lift off, to take away The pivot of the unit, aorist subjunctive passive, and a hapax in the New Testament: it stands in this verse and its synoptic parallels alone. The passive names no agent, which leaves both readings open, that men take Him and that God gives Him up. Cambridge calls this the earliest recorded public intimation of the crucifixion; Pulpit, quoting Godet, hears in it the announcement of a violent death; Benson and Gill read it more plainly as His being taken away by death without pressing the violence. The verb itself will bear the weight, but it does not by itself prove the reading, and the commentators are not agreed on how far to press it.
ἀπ’ap’fromG575
√ ἀπό — "off," iPreposition
αὐτῶνautōnthemG846
√ αὐτός — the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438 (ἑαυτοῦ)) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other personsPersonal / Possessive PronounGenitive Masculine 3rd Person Plural
τότεtotethenG5119
√ τότε — the when, iAdverb
tote: then, at that time A small adverb carrying the whole reversal. Everything Jesus has denied in verse 34 becomes fitting at this word, and the change is not in the law of fasting but in the location of the Bridegroom.
ἐνen. . .G1722
√ ἐν — "in," at, (up-)on, by, etcPreposition
ἐκείναιςekeinais. . .G1565
√ ἐκεῖνος — that one (or (neuter) thing)Demonstrative PronounDative Feminine Plural
ταῖςtais. . .G3588
√ ὁ — the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom)ArticleDative Feminine Plural
ἡμέραιςhēmerais. . .G2250
√ ἡμέρα — day, iNounDative Feminine Plural
νηστεύσουσινnēsteusousinthey will fastG3522
√ νηστεύω — to abstain from food (religiously)VerbFuture Indicative Active3rd Person Plural
nēsteuō: to fast (future indicative active) The same verb the questioners used in verse 33, now in the future and in the mouth of Jesus. Cambridge points to Acts 13:2 to 3 as the record of its fulfilment, the church at Antioch ministering to the Lord and fasting, and Benson adds that they should both hunger and thirst from hardship (1 Corinthians 4:11) and keep religious fasts. What Jesus foretells is not an obligation reimposed but a grief that will need no commanding.

The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.

Grand Commentary — the unit, read whole

synthesis · verify

AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.

i. The complaint that counts fasts — Luke 5:33

The charge is made in the language of arithmetic. πυκνὰ (pykna, G4437) is not simply often but thickly, close-packed, a word that stands in only three New Testament verses; beside it δεήσεις ποιοῦνται, they make petitions for themselves, where Cambridge corrects the smoother English with the single word: Rather, supplications. Luke leaves the questioners unnamed, and Ellicott notes that St Luke is less definite than the other two in stating who the questioners were, Mark alone telling us that both classes were present. Pulpit supplies the legal history the quarrel presupposes: in the Law of Moses one fast only was enjoined, the Day of Atonement; four were added after the Exile; the prophets gave that addition no sanction (Zechariah 7:1 to 12; Zechariah 8:19); and rigid Jews of our Lord's day fasted twice a week. Gill fills in the same picture from the Jewish side, that the Pharisees fasted at least twice in the week and made frequent prayers in the synagogues. Geneva names the disease without pity: hypocrites and ignorant men make a point of making fasting and unimportant things a matter of holiness. ⚙ Notice what the complaint does not say. It does not accuse the disciples of breaking a commandment, because there was no commandment to break. It compares one company's practice with another's and finds the difference intolerable, and the possessive σοὶ, thine, aims the finding at Jesus.

ii. The answer that changes the category — Luke 5:34

Jesus does not defend the practice; He renames the occasion. The question opens with Μὴ, the particle that expects the answer No, and Ellicott observes that Luke's form of the question is somewhat stronger in form than the simple question in the other reports. The men in view are υἱοὶ τοῦ νυμφῶνος, sons of the bridal chamber, and Cambridge identifies them as the friends of the bridegroom, the paranymphs who fetched the bride, adding that the figure would be specially forcible to John's disciples, who had heard their own master speak of the joy of the friend of the bridegroom (John 3:29). Gill states the inference the grammar carries: that He was signifying that He was the bridegroom, and His disciples the children of the bride chamber. Geneva turns the verse against imposed observance, that laws made without consideration of circumstances are not only tyrannous but harmful to the Church, and the causative ποιῆσαι νηστεῦσαι, to make them fast, does put compulsion rather than fasting in the dock. ⚙ The decisive word is the plainest one in the verse, ἐστιν, is. The disciples are not exempt because of a superior doctrine; they are exempt because of who is at the table.

iii. The shadow across the wedding — Luke 5:35

The answer does not end in festival. Pulpit, quoting Godet, describes the turn: the heart of Jesus overflowing with joy in the midst of this feast of publicans, and then the countenance overcast, the shadow of a painful vision passing across His brow, so that in this striking and poetic answer Jesus evidently announces His violent death. The weight rests on ἀπαρθῇ (aparthē, G522), aorist subjunctive passive of a verb that occurs nowhere else in the New Testament; Cambridge says it clearly hints at a violent end and calls the sentence the earliest recorded public intimation of the crucifixion, the private hint having been given to Nicodemus (John 3:14). Benson and Gill read the removal without pressing the violence, Gill saying only that in a short time He, the bridegroom of His church and people, should be taken away by death. ⚙ We report the disagreement rather than settling it: the verb is capable of the stronger reading, the context of a wedding cut short leans toward it, but the lexical evidence alone does not compel it. What is beyond dispute is the shape of the sentence. Fasting returns, but it returns as grief, not as observance. Cambridge marks the point precisely, that it is not said, then shall ye be able to insist on their fasting, and Acts 13:2 to 3 shows the prediction keeping itself.

Read under Sola Scriptura — this tool’s own fallible reading (⚙)

⚙ Offered as a fallible reading, to be tested against the text. The quarrel in these verses is not really about food. It is about whether religion is measured or occasioned. The questioners count: frequently, likewise, twice in the week. Jesus answers with a calendar of one event, and the event is Himself. That is the claim the passage stands or falls on, because in the prophets the bridegroom of Israel is never a man: your Maker is your husband (Isaiah 54:5), as a bridegroom rejoices over his bride, so will your God rejoice over you (Isaiah 62:5), and in that day you will call Me My husband (Hosea 2:16). Jesus steps into that role in a sentence so ordinary that nobody recorded an objection to it. And He does not hold the role serenely. In the same breath He says the Bridegroom will be lifted away, using a verb (apairō) that the New Testament never uses again, in a passive that names no one as the one who does the lifting. So the Christian relation to fasting is set by two facts and not by a rule: the Bridegroom has been taken, and the Bridegroom has come back (Matthew 28:20). A fast that mourns an absence God has ended is a fast that has lost its occasion; a life that has never known the absence has not yet understood the wedding. We under-claim deliberately at one point: whether Jesus here intends the specific manner of His death, or only its fact, is not something this text alone decides, and the commentators before us do not agree.

Not a verse of Scripture but a line of this tool's own fallible reading: they came counting fasts, and He answered with a wedding.

Canonical Threads — out to the whole of Scripture

cross-refs · verify

AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.

The same answer in three Gospels, and the word Matthew changes verbal / quotation: confirmed

Matthew 9:15 and Mark 2:19 to 20 carry the same exchange in the same words, and the Verifier records the shared vocabulary that makes the link verbal rather than merely thematic: νυμφίος (nymphios, G3566, bridegroom) and νηστεύω (nēsteuō, G3522, to fast), both uncommon words, together with υἱός in the idiom sons of the bridal chamber. Cambridge notes one deliberate difference: at Matthew 9:15 the verb is mourn where Luke has fast, which makes the antithesis with John 16:20 more striking. Ellicott and Poole both send the reader to the parallels rather than re-arguing the passage, and Barnes does nothing else. ⚙ The comparison matters for a reason beyond harmony: Luke's is the sharpest form of the question, since the μή construction forbids the answer Yes.

Matthew 9:15 · Mark 2:19 · Mark 2:20

basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G3566 νυμφίος (in 12 vv) and G3522 νηστεύω (in 15 vv), both rare, plus G5207 υἱός in the same Semitic idiom; Greek to Greek synoptic parallel, all refs New Testament

“Frequently”: a rare word, and the two other men it describes verbal / quotation: confirmed

πυκνὰ (pykna, G4437) stands in three New Testament verses only. At Acts 24:26 Felix sends for Paul the oftener, hoping for a bribe; at 1 Timothy 5:23 Paul tells Timothy to take a little wine for his frequent infirmities. ⚙ The lexical link is real and the Verifier records it, but no writer is quoting another: the value of the pairing is that the word is elsewhere used of appetite and of weakness, and here it is used of devotion, counted up as a credential. That is an observation about usage, not a doctrine, and we do not press it further.

1 Timothy 5:23 · Acts 24:26

basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G4437 πυκνός (in 3 vv), a genuinely rare lexeme and therefore a real verbal link; all refs New Testament, and no quotation is claimed between them

The Bridegroom whom the prophets gave to the LORD typological

In the prophets the marriage figure is God's own and no one else's: your Maker is your husband, the LORD of Hosts is His name (Isaiah 54:5 to 6); as a bridegroom rejoices over his bride, so will your God rejoice over you (Isaiah 62:5); in that day you will call Me My husband, and I will betroth you to Me forever (Hosea 2:16 to 20); Jeremiah 2:2 remembers the bride who followed Him in the wilderness. Pulpit states the derivation plainly, that the imagery of the bridegroom is drawn from Hosea 2:19, 20 and perhaps also from the more mystical Scripture, Psalm 45 and the Song of Songs, and adds that Jesus here clearly regards Himself as the Christ. Cambridge points to the Baptist's own use of the figure at John 3:29. ⚙ The force of the link is the substitution. The role the prophets reserve to the LORD is occupied, without preamble and without defence, by the man answering a question about mealtimes.

Isaiah 54:5 · Isaiah 62:5 · Hosea 2:16 · Hosea 2:19 · Jeremiah 2:2 · Psalm 45:1

basis: Cross-Testament, Greek to Hebrew: no shared Strong's number is possible and none is claimed, so this cannot be tiered verbal. The basis is the figural identification recorded by Pulpit (Hosea 2:19, 20; Psalm 45; Song of Songs) and by Cambridge (John 3:29). Attestation is ancient and widely held, not novel

Which fasts were being argued about structural / thematic: confirmed

The Law commands one fast, the Day of Atonement, where Israel is to afflict its souls (Leviticus 16:29 to 31; Leviticus 23:27 to 32). Pulpit records that after the Exile the one fast was increased to four but the prophets gave no sanction to this added ritual, pointing to Zechariah 7:1 to 12 and Zechariah 8:19, where the fasts of the fourth, fifth, seventh and tenth months are questioned and then promised as feasts of joy. Cambridge cites the prophets' own verdict on fasting divorced from goodness: Isaiah 58:3 to 6, Micah 6:6 to 8, Amos 5:21 to 24; Isaiah 58:3 to 7 answers the complaint Why have we fasted and You have not seen, by naming the fast God chose, to loose the chains of injustice and share bread with the hungry, and Joel 2:12 to 13 asks for rent hearts and not garments. ⚙ So the questioners in Luke 5:33 stand on custom, not on command, and the prophets they would have claimed had already ruled against counting.

Leviticus 16:29 · Leviticus 23:27 · Zechariah 7:3 · Zechariah 8:19 · Isaiah 58:3 · Joel 2:12

basis: Cross-Testament, Greek to Hebrew: no shared Strong's lexeme is available or claimed, so the tier is thematic, not verbal. The basis is the institutional and prophetic background of the fasts under dispute, cited in the brief by Pulpit (Zechariah 7:1 to 12; Zechariah 8:19; Leviticus 16:29) and Cambridge (Isaiah 58:3 to 6; Micah 6:6 to 8; Amos 5:21 to 24; Leviticus 16:29)

“Taken away from them” and “cut off from the land of the living” flagged: verify source

Isaiah 53:8 says of the Servant that He was cut off from the land of the living, and the removal in Luke 5:35 is expressed by ἀπαρθῇ (aparthē, G522), a passive verb of lifting away that appears nowhere else in the New Testament. Cambridge says the verb clearly hints at a violent end and calls this the earliest recorded public intimation of the crucifixion; Pulpit, quoting Godet, says Jesus evidently announces His violent death. Benson and Gill do not press it, reading the phrase as being taken away by death. ⚙ We flag this pairing rather than confirm it. Neither commentator in the brief actually cites Isaiah 53 here; the connection is a synthesis of two separate observations, that the verb implies violence and that Isaiah uses a verb of violent removal for the Servant, and it depends on a judgment about the Greek that the sources themselves divide over. Readers should verify it against Isaiah 53 directly and weigh Benson and Gill against Cambridge and Godet.

Isaiah 53:8

basis: Cross-Testament, Greek to Hebrew, so no shared lexeme exists and no verbal tier is possible. Beyond that, the link is contested within the brief itself: Cambridge and Pulpit (quoting Godet) read ἀπαρθῇ as implying a violent end, while Benson and Gill read it only as death and departure, and no source in the brief cites Isaiah 53:8 at this verse. Flagged for verification rather than asserted

Christ in the Unittypology · verify

AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.

He takes the Husband's name ancient/widely-held

⚙ The claim of this unit is made sideways, in an argument about meals, which is part of its force. Asked why His disciples do not fast, Jesus answers with a wedding and puts Himself at the centre of it as ὁ νυμφίος, the bridegroom. In the prophets that title belongs to the LORD: Isaiah 54:5, Isaiah 62:5, Hosea 2:16 to 20. Gill draws the conclusion from the grammar, that Jesus is signifying that He was the bridegroom, and His disciples the children of the bride chamber; Benson has Him say in effect, I am the bridegroom of my church; Pulpit says Jesus here clearly regards Himself as the Christ, identical with the long looked for Divine Deliverer, and traces the imagery to Hosea 2:19, 20, Psalm 45 and the Song of Songs; Cambridge connects it to the Baptist's own words at John 3:29. The line runs on to the marriage of the Lamb (Revelation 19:7) and to the bride Paul presents to Christ (2 Corinthians 11:2; Ephesians 5:31 to 32). This is the ancient and widely held reading, recorded in this brief by Gill, Benson, Pulpit and Cambridge alike.

Isaiah 54:5 · Isaiah 62:5 · Hosea 2:19 · John 3:29 · Ephesians 5:31 · Revelation 19:7

The first public word of the cross ancient/widely-held

⚙ The wedding does not last the sentence. ἀπαρθῇ (aparthē, G522) is passive and agentless: the Bridegroom is not said to leave, He is said to be lifted away. Cambridge calls this the earliest recorded public intimation of His crucifixion, of which a dim hint had been given privately to Nicodemus (John 3:14); Pulpit, citing Godet, hears the announcement of a violent death, and adds that while the intimation to Nicodemus was the first private one, this seems to have been the first public announcement of the last scene of the earth life. Gill reads it simply as being taken away by death, without the emphasis on violence, and Benson likewise speaks of the bridegroom being taken away and the disciples left to toil and sorrow. ⚙ The reading that Jesus foretells His death here is ancient and widely held; the further claim that the verb itself proves the manner of that death is the disputed part, and we leave it disputed. The agentless passive is worth noting on its own: Acts 2:23 will say both things at once, delivered up by God's set purpose and put to death by lawless hands.

John 3:14 · Isaiah 53:8 · Acts 2:23

Why Christian fasting is absence-shaped ancient/widely-held

⚙ Jesus does not abolish fasting and does not command it. He dates it. The disciples will fast when, and because, the Bridegroom is gone, and Cambridge is careful about the form of the words: it is not said, then shall ye be able to insist on their fasting; the Christian fasts would be voluntary, not compulsory, the result of a felt need, not the observance of a rigid command. Acts 13:2 to 3 is the fulfilment, the church at Antioch fasting as it ministers to the Lord, and Benson adds 1 Corinthians 4:11, where the apostles hunger and thirst from hardship rather than from resolution. But the same logic cuts the other way too, and Cambridge draws that conclusion as well: for now the bridegroom is not taken from us but is with us (Matthew 28:20; John 14:16; John 16:7). ⚙ That double movement, absence that is real and presence that is promised, is not a compromise between two commentators; it is what the tense change between verse 34 and verse 35 actually produces, and it is why neither enforced fasting nor a refusal to fast can appeal to this passage as a rule.

Acts 13:2 · Matthew 28:20 · John 16:7 · 1 Corinthians 4:11

Apparatus & Provenance

The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.

Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:

  • Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, (1880s)
  • Charles Ellicott, Commentary for English Readers (1878)
  • Geneva Study Bible, Marginal Notes (1599)
  • Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory (1871)
  • John Gill, Exposition of the Entire Bible (1746–63)
  • Joseph Benson, Commentary on the Old and New Testaments (1810s)
  • Matthew Henry, Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)
  • Matthew Poole, Annotations upon the Holy Bible (1685)
  • The Pulpit Commentary, Spence & Exell, eds. (1880s)

Text. BSB (CC0) with the Berean interlinear and Strong's numbering. One variant is noted in the sources: at Luke 5:35 Cambridge prefers and when over but when, citing the reading καὶ in A, B and D, which joins the removal of the bridegroom to the coming days rather than contrasting them. Pulpit and Cambridge both observe that the words and fasting at Matthew 17:21, Mark 9:29, Acts 10:30 and 1 Corinthians 7:5 are absent from the older authorities and are probably an ascetic interpolation; that affects how the New Testament's overall witness on fasting is weighed, and it is a text-critical judgment of the 1880s that we report rather than endorse.

Sources. Ten commentators are named in the brief, but three of them say almost nothing here: Barnes refers the reader entirely to his notes on Matthew 9:14 to 17, Poole to his notes on Matthew and Mark after one substantive paragraph, and Henry's entry is his concise comment on the whole of Luke 5:27 to 39 rather than on these verses. The unit therefore leans on Cambridge, Pulpit, Gill, Benson, Ellicott and Geneva. Pulpit's most quotable sentences are a quotation of Godet, a nineteenth century Swiss commentator, not of the Pulpit editors themselves; that is marked in the editorial notes.

What is uncertain. First, whether ἀπαρθῇ carries the implication of violence. It is a hapax in the New Testament, so usage elsewhere in the canon cannot settle it, and the sources divide: Cambridge and Godet press it, Benson and Gill do not. Second, the link to Isaiah 53:8 is our own construction and is badged flagged for that reason. Third, Luke does not say who asked the question; Ellicott notes that Luke is less definite than Matthew and Mark, and the identification of the questioners comes from Mark 2:18. Fourth, the lexicon glosses in this brief are truncated at the source (several end mid word, for example G2250 ἡμέρα, day, i); glosses given in the notes above are drawn from the parse and from the sourced entries, and where a gloss is fuller than the brief's fragment it is a standard lexical sense, not a new claim. Fifth, nothing in this unit is a formal quotation of the Old Testament, and every thread pairing this passage with Hebrew Scripture is tiered structural or typological for that reason.

= human, public-domain source, quoted and named. = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)