Later, they sent some of the Pharisees and Herodians to catch Jesus in His words.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai apostellousin pros auton tinas tōn Pharisaiōn kai tōn Hērōdianōn hina agreusōsin auton logō
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
Paying Taxes to Caesar
Mark 12:13–17 — Paying Taxes to Caesar. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
Later, they sent some of the Pharisees and Herodians to catch Jesus in His words.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai apostellousin pros auton tinas tōn Pharisaiōn kai tōn Hērōdianōn hina agreusōsin auton logō
“Teacher,” they said, “we know that You are honest and seek favor from no one. Indeed, You are impartial and teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar or not? Should we pay them or not?”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Didaskale kai elthontes legousin autō oidamen hoti ei alēthēs kai soi ou melei peri oudenos gar ou blepeis eis prosōpon anthrōpōn all’ didaskeis tēn hodon tou Theou ep’ alētheias exestin dounai kēnson Kaisari ē ou dōmen ē mē dōmen
But Jesus saw through their hypocrisy and said, “Why are you testing Me? Bring Me a denarius to inspect.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de Ho eidōs autōn tēn hypokrisin eipen autois Ti peirazete me pherete moi dēnarion hina idō
So they brought it, and He asked them, “Whose image is this? And whose inscription?” “Caesar’s,” they answered.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de hoi ēnenkan kai legei autois Tinos hē eikōn hautē kai hē epigraphē Kaisaros de Hoi eipan autō
Then Jesus told them, “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.” And they marveled at Him.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de Ho Iēsous eipen autois apodote Kaisari Ta Kaisaros kai tō Theō ta tou Theou Kai exethaumazon ep’ autō
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
Mark opens with a historic present and a hunting verb: ἀποστέλλουσιν (G649) and ἀγρεύσωσιν (G64, used only here in the New Testament). Ellicott notes that in Matthew the Pharisees take counsel and send their disciples, while here the act appears as the result of a coalition of the two parties named, and he prefers "to entrap" for the verb. Gill presses the lexical point that the Verifier's parse supports: the figure is of prey hunted and taken in a net. The coalition itself is the trap's mechanism. Gill sets it out plainly, that the Pharisees scrupled to pay tribute to a heathen prince while the Herodians held their place under Caesar and were committed to paying it; Pulpit adds that if Jesus approved the tribute He would face the malice of a people proud of its freedom, and if He forbade it, the wrath of Rome. Cambridge notes that the Herodians came in person while the Pharisees sent younger scholars, and JFB, following Luke 20:20, calls these willing tools spies feigning righteousness so as to deliver Him to the governor's authority. The rare noun Ἡρῳδιανοί (G2265, three verses in all) has appeared once before in Mark, at 3:6, where the same two parties took counsel to destroy Him. ⚙ Mark has thus bracketed the whole Galilean and Judean ministry between one plot and its completion.
The flattery is doctrinally sound. They call Him ἀληθής (G227, true, as not concealing), say that nobody's opinion is a care to Him (οὐ μέλει σοι, G3199, impersonal), that He does not look into the face of men, and that He teaches the way of God upon truth. JFB observes that by such flattery, though they said only the truth, they hoped to throw Him off His guard. Ellicott identifies the middle clause as essentially Hebrew in form, made familiar by the Greek Old Testament, and Geneva glosses it as not judging by outward appearance, so that the truth is not darkened. Then the question, framed with ἔξεστιν (G1832) as though it were a matter of Torah permission, with the Latin loanword κῆνσος (G2778, four verses) at its center. Cambridge sees the move for what it is: the snare has left the ecclesiastical sphere for the more dangerous area of political duty, and the capitation tax named was the one keenly resented by Judas the Gaulonite and his followers. JFB identifies it as the civil poll tax paid by all enrolled in the census. Gill notices the second question as an escalation, since they ask not only whether it is lawful but whether He advises it, so that He might be charged with persuading or dissuading. ⚙ The deliberative subjunctive repeated (δῶμεν ἢ μὴ δῶμεν) is a demand for a reportable yes or no.
The reply begins before the reply: εἰδὼς (G1492, perfect participle) and ὑπόκρισιν (G5272). Ellicott records that Mark alone uses the specific word naming the questioners' sin, while omitting the word "hypocrites" from Jesus' own lips as Matthew has it; JFB describes the thing itself, that the malignity of their hearts took the form of craft, pretending what they did not feel. Instead of arguing, Jesus asks for evidence, and the evidence must be theirs. Cambridge, quoting Farrar, notes that they would not be likely to be carrying the hated Roman coinage though they could produce a temple shekel at once, yet a step outside the Court of the Gentiles would fetch one from the money-changers. Cambridge also describes the object: the laureled head with the legend Tiberius Caesar, son of the deified Augustus, Augustus, Imperator, and notes that Rome had allowed Judea a special imageless coinage precisely because the imperial image offended stricter Jews. The two nouns Jesus asks after are εἰκών (G1504) and ἐπιγραφή (G1923, five verses); JFB glosses the second as the words encircling the head on the obverse. Pulpit adds the principle from Maimonides by way of Lightfoot, that wherever a king's money is current the inhabitants acknowledge that king for lord. ⚙ The one-word genitive answer, Καίσαρος, is a confession: they have already settled the political question in their purses.
The verb changes. They asked about δοῦναι (G1325, to give); He answers with ἀπόδοτε (G591, aorist imperative), which Cambridge renders "Give back, pay as being due," noting that this was not a question of a voluntary gift but of a legal due. JFB sees that in this general form it was impossible for sedition itself to dispute the saying, and yet the snare dissolved. Pulpit observes that Jesus avoids altogether the doubtful question of whether Rome rightly ruled Judea and rests only on the undisputed fact of the current coin, then lifts the matter above the controversy of the hour to a principle belonging to all times and places. The weight falls on the unrequested second clause. JFB calls it a profound but, to them, startling addition, incomparable for fulness, brevity, clearness and weight; Cambridge insists that obedience to Caesar must ever be conditioned by obedience to God, and quotes Erasmus: give to God that which has the image and superscription of God, the soul. Pulpit quotes Tertullian to the same effect. Mark closes with ἐξεθαύμαζον (G2296), which Pulpit corrects from the aorist to this intensive imperfect, they stood marvelling greatly at Him. Henry's concise note is the sober coda: many will praise the words of a sermon who will not be commanded by its doctrines. ⚙ Luke adds that they held their peace and went away, so the wonder here is defeat, not faith.
⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested. The trap assumed that Caesar and God are competitors for one indivisible loyalty, so that any answer must rob one of them. Jesus refuses the premise without ever denying either claim, and He does it by a question about property rather than a ruling about politics: whose likeness is stamped here, and whose name is written around it? Once that is answered, the coin is not a donation but a debt, and ἀπόδοτε (G591) settles it: return the thing to the one whose mark it carries. What makes the saying explosive is the clause nobody requested. If the rule is that a stamped thing goes back to the one whose image it bears, then the question every hearer must now ask is what bears God's image, and the answer, which Jesus leaves them to make, is the man holding the coin. Caesar's claim is therefore real and strictly bounded; he may have back the metal he minted. God's claim is not one item on the same list, because it covers the claimant. Tertullian and Erasmus, both quoted in the sources above, read it exactly this way, so the reading is not novel, though the inference from Genesis 1:27 is drawn by the reader rather than stated in Mark's Greek, and honesty requires saying so. Two consequences follow that this unit does not spell out and I hold loosely: first, that the saying grounds civil obedience without sanctifying any particular regime, since Jesus never says Rome ruled rightly, only that its coin was current; second, that the man who spoke it will shortly be handed to that same Caesar's governor by these same questioners, under an ἐπιγραφή of his own (Mark 15:26). The One who told them what belongs to God gave God the thing that bore God's image, and it cost Him his life.
⚙ A fallible reading, not Scripture: the coin goes back to the face it carries, and so do you.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
Matthew and Luke record the same confrontation, and the shared vocabulary is dense and unusually rare. Matthew 22:19 has κῆνσος (G2778) and δηνάριον (G1220); Matthew 22:20 has ἐπιγραφή (G1923) and εἰκών (G1504); Luke 20:24 has all three of Καῖσαρ, δηνάριον and ἐπιγραφή; Matthew 22:21 repeats Καῖσαρ with ἀποδίδωμι (G591). Almost every commentator in this unit (Ellicott, Benson, Barnes, Poole, Gill) simply refers the reader to Matthew 22:15-22, which is itself evidence of how completely the accounts overlap. The Verifier confirms the shared lexemes; the differences the sources do note are Markan touches, chiefly ὑπόκρισις for Matthew's "wickedness" (Ellicott) and the imperfect ἐξεθαύμαζον (Pulpit).
Matthew 22:19 · Matthew 22:20 · Matthew 22:21 · Luke 20:24
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G2778 κῆνσος (in 4 vv, rare) and G1923 ἐπιγραφή (in 5 vv, rare), with G1504 εἰκών (in 20 vv), G1220 δηνάριον (in 15 vv), G2541 Καῖσαρ (in 23 vv), G591 ἀποδίδωμι (in 46 vv); all refs are New Testament Greek, so a verbal link is legitimate. This is parallel narration of one event, not a quotation of one text by another.
The noun Ἡρῳδιανοί (G2265) stands in only three verses in the New Testament, and two of them are Mark's. At Mark 3:6 the Pharisees go out and immediately take counsel with the Herodians against Jesus, how they might destroy Him, and that is the first death plot in the Gospel. Here the same improbable alliance reappears at the last week. Cambridge makes the connection explicitly, referring the reader to the note on Mark 3:6 and observing that as before, so now, the Jewish royalists united themselves with the ultra-orthodox Pharisaic party. ⚙ The recurrence looks like deliberate Markan framing rather than coincidence, though Mark does not say so.
Mark 3:6 · Matthew 22:16
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G2265 Ἡρῳδιανοί (in 3 vv, rare), with G5330 Φαρισαῖος (in 93 vv); Mark 3:6 and Matthew 22:16 are both Greek New Testament, so the verbal tier applies. The link is recurrence of a rare proper noun within one author, not a citation.
ἐπιγραφή (G1923) occurs in only five verses. Mark uses it twice: here, of the legend encircling Tiberius' head, which JFB describes as the words on the obverse side; and at Mark 15:26, of the writing of the charge against Him, THE KING OF THE JEWS. Luke 23:38 carries the same noun for the same titulus. ⚙ In the first case an inscription names who owns the coin; in the second, Rome's inscription names the crime and, without meaning to, names the King. The verbal link is real and computed; the irony is the machine's inference, not Mark's statement.
Mark 15:26 · Luke 23:38 · Matthew 22:20
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G1923 ἐπιγραφή (in 5 vv, rare), all refs New Testament Greek. Rarity justifies the verbal tier for the word link; the theological reading built on it is ⚙ synthesis and is marked as such.
ὑπόκρισις (G5272), the stage word for acting a feigned part, appears in six verses. Ellicott notes that Mark alone selects it for this delegation. Jesus warns against it as the leaven of the Pharisees (Luke 12:1); Matthew 23:28 uses it of appearing righteous outwardly while full of lawlessness within; Paul charges Peter and even Barnabas with it at Antioch (Galatians 2:13); 1 Timothy 4:2 speaks of liars whose consciences are seared; 1 Peter 2:1 puts it on the list of things to lay aside. ⚙ The word travels from a trap set for Christ to a fault found in the church's own leaders, which is the point of tracing it.
Luke 12:1 · Matthew 23:28 · Galatians 2:13 · 1 Timothy 4:2 · 1 Peter 2:1
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G5272 ὑπόκρισις (in 6 vv, rare), with G5330 Φαρισαῖος (in 93 vv) at Luke 12:1; all refs New Testament Greek. A shared rare lexeme across independent passages, not a quotation.
Jesus' rule is that a thing bearing a likeness and a name returns to the one whose likeness and name it bears. The coin carries Caesar's εἰκών (G1504). Genesis 1:27 says man was made in God's image, and Psalm 24:1 says the earth and its fullness are the LORD's, while Deuteronomy 6:4-5 demands the whole heart for the one LORD. Mark's Greek makes no quotation of any of these and names none of them. The link is a shared logic of image and ownership, drawn out in the sources themselves: Pulpit quotes Tertullian, give to Caesar his image stamped upon his coin and give to God his own image stamped upon you, and Cambridge quotes Erasmus, give to God that which has the image and superscription of God, the soul. ⚙ This is the reading I find most persuasive, but it is an inference the hearer must complete, not a statement in the text.
Genesis 1:27 · Psalm 24:1 · Deuteronomy 6:4
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek New Testament to Hebrew Old Testament), so no shared Strong's number is possible and no verbal tier is available. The recorded basis is a shared motif: a bearer stamped with an owner's image, and total divine claim on what is God's. Attested in the sources by Tertullian (via Pulpit) and Erasmus (via Cambridge), not by a citation formula in Mark.
The Pharisaic objection was that tribute to a heathen prince compromised a people who called God their king; Gill records exactly this, that they scrupled to pay because Caesar was a heathen prince and they the Lord's free people. The Hebrew Scriptures are less absolute. Ezra 4:13 treats tribute, custom and toll to the Persian crown as the normal obligation of the province, and Ezra 7:24 shows that same crown exempting temple servants from it. Daniel 2:21 says it is God who removes kings and sets up kings, and Proverbs 8:15 says that by wisdom kings reign. ⚙ Read together these make room for a genuine, bounded civil claim under an undisputed divine sovereignty, which is the space Jesus' answer occupies. No verbal link exists, and none is claimed.
Ezra 4:13 · Ezra 7:24 · Daniel 2:21 · Proverbs 8:15
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's numbers cannot be computed and the verbal tier is excluded. Basis is a shared institutional pattern: legitimate tribute owed to a foreign sovereign whose rule is itself under God's disposal. The Pharisaic scruple it answers is recorded in the sources by Gill.
"Teacher, we know that You are true" is accurate and murderous at once. The Psalms have a standing category for this: Psalm 12:2 describes flattering lips and a double heart, and Psalm 55:21 says the speech was smoother than butter while war was in the heart. Pulpit, closing on the marvel of v. 17, reaches for a third: the words of the psalmist were verified in them, the wicked is snared in the work of his own hands (Psalm 9:15), and adds that Jesus vaulted over the trap set for Him, leaving them entangled in it. ⚙ The motif is genuine and the Psalm 9 application is Pulpit's, not mine; Mark quotes none of these texts.
Psalm 12:2 · Psalm 55:21 · Psalm 9:15
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so no shared Strong's lexeme is computable and verbal tiering is excluded. Basis is a shared motif of flattering speech concealing a trap, and of the trapper caught in his own net. Psalm 9:15 is applied to this scene by Pulpit; Psalm 12:2 and Psalm 55:21 are ⚙ additions on the same motif.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
Jesus does not answer the tax question with a tax ruling; He answers it with the word εἰκών (G1504). A stamped thing belongs to the one whose stamp it bears. The ancient reading, recorded here in the sources themselves, carries that principle straight to the hearer: Tertullian, quoted by Pulpit, says give to Caesar his image stamped upon his coin and give to God his own image stamped upon you, so that in rendering Caesar his coin you render your own self to God; Erasmus, quoted by Cambridge, says give to God that which has the image and superscription of God, the soul. ⚙ The New Testament then takes one further step that this passage does not take for itself: the same noun names the Son as the image of the invisible God (Colossians 1:15, 2 Corinthians 4:4). If man returns to God what bears God's image, then the One standing in the temple holding the denarius is Himself what is owed, and He is the only hearer who rendered it whole.
Colossians 1:15 · 2 Corinthians 4:4 · Genesis 1:27
He asks after an ἐπιγραφή (G1923) in chapter 12 and receives one in chapter 15. The coin's legend read, in Cambridge's transcription, Tiberius Caesar, son of the deified Augustus; the writing over His head, in the same rare Greek word, read THE KING OF THE JEWS (Mark 15:26). ⚙ The men who produced Caesar's coin to trap Him would within days hand Him to Caesar's governor, and Rome would publish over Him a title truer than the one on its own silver. Mark makes the verbal link available by using the same uncommon noun twice in three chapters; he does not draw the conclusion, and I mark the reading as mine.
Mark 15:26 · Mark 12:16 · Luke 23:38
The rare noun κῆνσος (G2778) stands in only four verses, and JFB's note on this passage sends the reader to one of them: Matthew 17:25, where Jesus establishes that the sons are free, and then pays the tax so as to give no offense. ⚙ Read with Mark 12, the pattern is consistent and christological rather than merely prudential. He is under no obligation He did not assume, and He assumes it anyway. That disposition is not confined to coinage: Philippians 2:6-8 says He did not grasp equality with God but emptied Himself and became obedient to death. The freedom is real and the submission is voluntary, which is precisely what "give back to God the things of God" looks like when the giver owes nothing.
Matthew 17:25 · Philippians 2:6-8
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text: BSB (CC0) with the Berean interlinear and Strong's parses supplied in the brief; the Greek word division and index numbers in the notes follow that interlinear, whose display order is aligned to the English and therefore does not always match the Greek word order (v. 14 is the clearest case, where the vocative Διδάσκαλε is listed first though καὶ ἐλθόντες opens the sentence). The literal renderings above follow the Greek order.
Sources: of the ten commentators available, Barnes and Poole contribute nothing substantive to this pericope. Barnes' entire note on each of the five verses is a referral to Matthew 22:15-22, and Poole's is a referral to the same place, his one long paragraph here being about the Sadducees of the following section rather than the tribute question. Benson is nearly as brief. That is itself a datum: the older English tradition treated Matthew's account as the primary text and Mark's as derivative, so this unit's exposition leans on Ellicott, JFB, Cambridge, Gill, Pulpit, Geneva and Henry.
Uncertain or secondary: the identification of the emperor as Tiberius is an inference, and Gill himself hedges it ("Augustus, or Tiberius; most probably the latter"); Mark names no emperor. Cambridge's transcription of the coin legend and Farrar's reconstruction of where the questioners obtained the denarius are both plausible historical reconstruction, not text. The maxim Pulpit cites, that wherever a king's money is current the inhabitants acknowledge that king as lord, is from Maimonides in the twelfth century by way of John Lightfoot, so it illustrates the principle rather than evidencing first-century practice. Pulpit's textual note that the true reading is the imperfect ἐξεθαύμαζον rather than the aorist ἐθαύμασαν agrees with the interlinear parse given in the brief.
Thread tiering: every link to the Hebrew Scriptures in this unit is tiered structural or thematic, because Mark quotes no Old Testament text here and because cross-Testament pairs cannot share a Strong's number, so no verbal basis is computable. The four verbal threads are Greek to Greek and rest on the Verifier's computed rare lexemes (G2265, G2778, G1923, G5272). The image-and-ownership reading of v. 17, though ancient (Tertullian, Erasmus), is an inference the text invites rather than a statement it makes, and is marked ⚙ wherever it is pressed.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)