When evening came, Jesus arrived with the Twelve.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai opsias genomenēs erchetai meta tōn dōdeka
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Last Supper
Mark 14:17–26 — The Last Supper. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
When evening came, Jesus arrived with the Twelve.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai opsias genomenēs erchetai meta tōn dōdeka
And while they were reclining and eating, Jesus said, “Truly I tell you, one of you who is eating with Me will betray Me.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai autōn anakeimenōn kai esthiontōn ho Iēsous eipen Amēn legō hymin hoti heis ex hymōn ho esthiōn met’ emou paradōsei me
They began to be grieved and to ask Him one after another, “Surely not I?”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Ērxanto lypeisthai kai legein autō heis kata heis Mēti egō
He answered, “It is one of the Twelve—the one who is dipping his hand into the bowl with Me.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de Ho eipen autois Heis tōn dōdeka ho embaptomenos eis to tryblion met’ emou
The Son of Man will go just as it is written about Him, but woe to that man by whom He is betrayed! It would be better for him if he had not been born.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
hoti ho Huios tou anthrōpou men hypagei kathōs gegraptai peri autou de ouai ekeinō tō anthrōpō di’ hou ho Huios tou anthrōpou paradidotai kalon autō ei ekeinos ho anthrōpos ouk egennēthē
While they were eating, Jesus took bread, spoke a blessing and broke it, and gave it to the disciples, saying, “Take it; this is My body.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai autōn esthiontōn labōn arton eulogēsas eklasen kai edōken autois kai eipen Labete touto estin mou to sōma
Then He took the cup, gave thanks, and gave it to them, and they all drank from it.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai labōn potērion eucharistēsas edōken autois kai pantes epion ex autou
He said to them, “This is My blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai eipen autois Touto estin mou to haima tēs diathēkēs to ekchynnomenon hyper pollōn
Truly I tell you, I will no longer drink of the fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it anew in the kingdom of God.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
amēn legō hymin hoti ou mē piō ouketi ek tou genēmatos tēs ampelou heōs ekeinēs tēs hēmeras hotan pinō auto kainon en tē basileia tou Theou
And when they had sung a hymn, they went out to the Mount of Olives.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai hymnēsantes exēlthon eis to oros tōn Elaiōn
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
Mark opens with a genitive absolute, ὀψίας γενομένης, and a historic present, ἔρχεται: evening having come, He comes with the Twelve. ✦ Pulpit fixes the hour by the law rather than the clock, noting that it was in the evening that the lamb was to be eaten. ✦ Maclaren guards the phrase "with the twelve" from arithmetic, saying that Mark does not mean thereby to specify the number but to define the class of His attendants. ✦ Gill fills in the movement from Bethany and the rejoining of Peter and John. Then the second genitive absolute, ἀνακειμένων καὶ ἐσθιόντων, and the announcement. ✦ Ellicott corrects the posture in four words, better, as they reclined. ⚙ The synthesis worth making is grammatical: the traitor is identified not by name but by a participle of eating, ὁ ἐσθίων μετ’ ἐμοῦ, so that what condemns him is the very intimacy of the table. ✦ Cambridge says the consciousness of the traitor's presence so wrought upon Him that He broke forth into words of yet plainer prediction.
The particle Μήτι expects the answer no, and the rough idiom εἷς κατὰ εἷς sends the question round the table one by one. ✦ Cambridge notices what is absent: none of them said "Is it he?" ✦ Maclaren turns that into the moral reading, that the possibilities of the darkest sin are in each of us. Christ's reply narrows nothing, Εἷς τῶν δώδεκα, one of the Twelve, and then the rare present participle ἐμβαπτόμενος with the rare noun τρύβλιον. ✦ Pulpit marks the tense against Matthew's aorist and calls Mark's form the more graphic; he also observes that the sign still did not single out one man, since several could dip in the same dish. ✦ Cambridge hears Psalm 41:9 in the phrase, one of His own familiar friends. ⚙ Then v. 21 sets two grammatical facts side by side and refuses to dissolve either: the perfect γέγραπται, it stands written, and the woe upon a man who acts. ✦ Henry states the balance exactly, that God's permitting the sins of men does not oblige them to sin; ✦ Gill says the traitor's sin is neither excused nor lessened by the fulfilling of the decrees of God.
Four aorists carry the institution, λαβὼν, εὐλογήσας, ἔκλασεν, ἔδωκεν, and the fifth word is an imperative, Λάβετε. ✦ Cambridge identifies the loaf as one of the unleavened cakes set before Him as Celebrant of the feast, and identifies the cup of v. 23 as probably the third cup, known as the Cup of Blessing. ✦ Ellicott notes the vocabulary split that Mark shares with Matthew, blessing over the bread and giving thanks over the cup. ✦ Pulpit, quoting Augustine, holds the elements and the thing signified apart: these are called sacraments because in them one thing is seen while another is understood; ✦ Gill, reading from the other tradition, calls the bread a figure and representation of the body. ⚙ The two are not reconciled here, and the tool will not pretend to reconcile them. On the cup, ✦ Ellicott insists the participle ἐκχυννόμενον is present, is being shed, and ✦ Cambridge and Pulpit both report that the best manuscripts omit "new" before covenant, so the phrase stands as τὸ αἷμά μου τῆς διαθήκης, the blood of the covenant. ✦ Cambridge sends that wording back to the blood thrown on the people at Exodus 24:8. ✦ Henry draws the pastoral inference from ὑπὲρ πολλῶν, for many: if for many, why not for me?
The oath formula returns, ἀμὴν λέγω ὑμῖν, and with it the strongest negation Greek has, οὐ μὴ with the aorist subjunctive, reinforced by οὐκέτι. ✦ Ellicott reads γενήματος as product rather than fruit and notes that Mark says kingdom of God where Matthew says kingdom of My Father. ✦ Pulpit observes that Jesus calls the wine the fruit of the vine after having spoken of it sacramentally as His blood. ✦ Gill takes the new drinking in a figurative and mystical sense, of the joys of heaven; ✦ Benson keeps it plainer, the next wine I drink will not be earthly, but heavenly. ⚙ The adjective is καινόν, new in kind rather than new in time, and it is accusative, agreeing with the drink and not adverbial, so what is promised is a renewed cup and not merely a later one. Then one participle ends the meal, ὑμνήσαντες. ✦ Cambridge and ✦ Gill agree that this was the Hallel, and ✦ Benson notes that the singing was customary at the close of the Passover. ⚙ Mark spends one word on the singing and three on the destination: they went out to the Mount of Olives.
⚙ Read only from the Greek of these ten verses, the unit is built on one repeated verb and one repeated preposition. παραδίδωμι occurs twice, first future active with a man of the Twelve as its subject (v. 18), then present passive with the Son of Man as its object and no agent named (v. 21); μετ’ ἐμοῦ occurs twice, in the eating and in the dipping, and both times it marks the nearness that makes the handing over a betrayal rather than a capture. Between those two poles Christ puts two objects into the hands of the men at the table, and the grammar of the giving is entirely active: He took, He blessed, He broke, He gave, and the only imperative He speaks is take. The cup saying then attaches His blood to a word, διαθήκη, that has no meaning apart from Israel's Scriptures, and the preposition ὑπέρ makes it blood poured out on behalf of many rather than blood merely spilled. And the last thing Mark records before Gethsemane is that they sang. ⚙ This tool's fallible reading, offered to be tested: the institution is not an interruption of the betrayal narrative but its answer. The handing over that Judas performs is enclosed, before and after, by a handing over that Christ performs, and He performs His first. Mark refuses to say how the bread is the body, and the tool will not supply what Mark withholds.
The traitor's hand and the Savior's hand reach into the same bowl, and only one of them is giving. (This line is the tool's own synthesis, not Scripture.)
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
Mark's τρύβλιον (G5165) appears in only two verses of the New Testament, and ἐμβάπτω (G1686) in only two. Both are shared with Matthew 26:23, which puts the same disclosure in the aorist. ✦ Pulpit sets the forms side by side and judges Mark's present participle the more graphic; the tense is the difference, the vocabulary is not.
Matthew 26:23
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G5165 τρύβλιον (in 2 vv) and G1686 ἐμβάπτω (in 2 vv), both rare, plus G3860 παραδίδωμι (in 117 vv); both refs are Greek New Testament, so shared Strong's numbers are a legitimate verbal basis
ὑμνέω (G5214, to hymn) stands in only four verses of the New Testament. Three of them are here, at the parallel in Matthew 26:30, and at Acts 16:25, where Paul and Silas sing hymns at midnight in the inner prison; the fourth is Hebrews 2:12, where the Son says He will sing praise in the midst of the congregation. ⚙ The tool notes the pattern without claiming Mark alludes to any of them: the word itself is what links the singing before Gethsemane to singing in chains and to the Son's own praise.
Matthew 26:30 · Acts 16:25 · Hebrews 2:12
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G5214 ὑμνέω (in 4 vv), rare, with Matthew 26:30 also sharing G1636 ἐλαία (in 15 vv) and G1831 ἐξέρχομαι (in 212 vv); all refs are Greek New Testament
✦ Cambridge glosses "one of the twelve" at v. 20 as one of His own familiar friends and cites Psalm 41:9, where the man of the psalmist's peace, who ate his bread, lifted his heel against him. ⚙ Mark makes no citation formula here and the shared element is a motif of table fellowship broken, not a quoted line; the tool tiers this conservatively.
Psalm 41:9
basis: Cross Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's numbers are impossible and no verbal tier is available; the recorded basis is the shared motif of a table companion who betrays, as identified by Cambridge at Mark 14:20, with no citation formula in Mark's text
With "new" absent from the best manuscripts (✦ Pulpit, ✦ Cambridge), the cup saying reads τὸ αἷμά μου τῆς διαθήκης, and ✦ Cambridge sends it straight back to Exodus 24:8, where Moses throws the blood on the people and says, behold the blood of the covenant. ⚙ The wording of the cup saying is Exodus's wording; the tier below is not a judgment that the borrowing is weak, but the application of the rule that a link between a Greek text and a Hebrew one cannot be scored verbal, since no shared Strong's lexeme can exist across the Testaments.
Exodus 24:8
basis: Cross Testament (Greek to Hebrew): no shared Strong's lexeme is possible, so the link cannot be tiered verbal even though the phrase blood of the covenant is taken over from Exodus 24:8; basis is the shared covenant ratification formula, identified by Cambridge
✦ Benson reads the cup as the sign of blood shed for establishing the new covenant, so that all who believe may receive its gracious promises. Behind that stand the promise of a covenant not like the one made with the fathers (Jeremiah 31:31-34) and the blood of the covenant by which prisoners are sent out of the waterless pit (Zechariah 9:11). ⚙ Mark quotes neither, and the manuscript question over καινῆς means the word "new" itself may not belong to Mark's text at all. The link is real but figural, and the tool marks it as such.
Jeremiah 31:31-34 · Zechariah 9:11
basis: Cross Testament, figural: a covenant promised in prophecy read as fulfilled in the cup. Widely held in the Christian tradition; Benson states the covenant reading, but Mark carries no citation formula and the adjective new is text critically doubtful here
ὑπὲρ πολλῶν (G5228 with G4183) stands where Isaiah's Servant bears the sin of many and makes many to be accounted righteous (Isaiah 53:11-12). ✦ Henry does not argue the allusion but draws its pastoral force: if for many, why not for me? ⚙ The tool records the Servant reading as figural rather than quoted, since Mark supplies no formula and no shared lexeme can be computed across the Testaments.
Isaiah 53:11-12
basis: Cross Testament, figural: the many of the Servant Song read behind ὑπὲρ πολλῶν. Ancient and widely held, but Mark gives no citation formula, and Greek to Hebrew pairs admit no shared Strong's basis
The loaf Christ breaks is the unleavened bread of the Passover ordinance (Exodus 12:8; Deuteronomy 16:3, the bread of affliction), and ✦ Cambridge accordingly calls it one of the unleavened cakes set before Him as Celebrant. The singing of v. 26 is, on ✦ Cambridge's and ✦ Gill's reading, the Hallel, Psalms 113 through 118. ⚙ Note for honesty: ✦ Pulpit prints the range as Psalm 108 to Psalm 118, which does not match the Hallel as usually defined and is most likely a misprint; the tool records the discrepancy rather than silently correcting the source.
Exodus 12:8 · Deuteronomy 16:3 · Psalm 113:1 · Psalm 118:1
basis: Cross Testament, figural and liturgical: the Passover ordinance supplies the bread and the Hallel supplies the hymn. No shared Strong's basis is computable across Greek and Hebrew; the identification of the hymn is the commentators' (Cambridge, Gill, Benson), not Mark's, and Pulpit's stated range disagrees with theirs
Luke 22:20 and 1 Corinthians 11:25 carry the same three elements as Mark's cup saying: ποτήριον (G4221), διαθήκη (G1242) and, in Luke, ὑπέρ (G5228). ✦ Cambridge records what Paul adds that Mark does not, do this, as oft as ye shall drink it, in remembrance of Me. ⚙ The lexemes are shared but not rare, and the differences in wording are real, so the tool declines a verbal tier here and records a strong structural link within one liturgical tradition.
Luke 22:20 · 1 Corinthians 11:25
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G4221 ποτήριον (in 28 vv), G1242 διαθήκη (in 30 vv), G5228 ὑπέρ (in 139 vv) with Luke 22:20, and G4221, G1242, G4095 πίνω (in 64 vv) with 1 Corinthians 11:25; none is rare enough to carry a verbal tier on its own and the wording differs, so the basis is recorded as shared pattern
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ The striking feature of vv. 22-24, read against the meal Mark has just described, is what is missing: the lamb. ✦ Cambridge states it directly, that in the ordinary Paschal feast the lamb occupied the chief place, that now the type was succeeded by the Antitype, and that of the Jewish Paschal lamb no word is said, the bread and wine being put in its place. The covenant formula fastened to the cup (Exodus 24:8) and the Servant's many (Isaiah 53:11-12) say the same thing in the other direction: the blood that ratifies and the blood that bears sin are here identified with His own. ✦ Henry reads the whole institution as a memorial of Christ's death and calls His precious blood the price of our redemption.
Exodus 12:8 · Exodus 24:8 · Isaiah 53:11-12
⚙ Mark uses one verb, παραδίδωμι, twice in four verses: future active with a man as subject (v. 18), present passive with the Son of Man as object (v. 21). Between them stands the perfect γέγραπται, it stands written. ✦ Pulpit names Psalm 22 as an instance of what is written and adds that this predestined purpose did not lessen the guilt of those who brought the Savior to the cross; ✦ Henry says God's permitting the sins of men does not oblige them to sin; ✦ Gill says the traitor's sin is not excused by the fulfilling of the decrees of God. ⚙ A caution the tool will not hide: the same Pulpit sentence cites "Isaiah 41," which does not read as a passion text and is most probably a misprint for Isaiah 53; Mark himself names no passage, so any identification is the commentator's.
Psalm 22:1 · Isaiah 53:11-12
⚙ The vow of v. 25 is the one place in the unit where Christ speaks of Himself as receiving rather than giving, and He postpones it: οὐ μὴ πίω οὐκέτι, the strongest refusal Greek can frame, until ἐν τῇ βασιλείᾳ τοῦ Θεοῦ. ✦ Gill takes the new drinking of the joys of heaven; ✦ Benson keeps it to the plain sense that the next wine He drinks will not be earthly but heavenly; ✦ Henry calls the supper an earnest and foretaste of the happiness of heaven. ⚙ The tool's own addition, offered as fallible: the adjective καινόν is new in kind, and it agrees with the drink, so the promise is not only that He will drink again but that what He drinks will be renewed. The abstinence between the cross and the kingdom is His, and the supper the Church keeps in the interval is held in the gap He left.
Matthew 26:29 · Luke 22:18
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
⚙ Honesty notes for this unit. Text. Three variants touch these ten verses and the commentators in the brief all flag them. At v. 19 the extra clause "and another said, Is it I?" is absent from the BSB text; ✦ Gill lists the versions and copies that lack it and ✦ Pulpit says it is omitted by the best authorities. At v. 22 the imperative "eat" after "Take" is wanting in many of the best manuscripts (✦ Ellicott, ✦ Cambridge, ✦ Gill), and the interlinear here carries only Λάβετε. At v. 24 the adjective καινῆς, new, before covenant is not sufficiently attested (✦ Pulpit; ✦ Cambridge notes that some of the best manuscripts omit it), so this unit reads "My blood of the covenant" and every reference above to a new covenant is the commentators' theology rather than Mark's wording.
Sources. Four of the eleven authors in the brief say almost nothing about Mark here because they treat the passage at Matthew: ✦ Barnes refers the reader entirely to his notes on Matthew 26:20-35, ✦ JFB refers to Luke and John, and ✦ Poole refers to Matthew 26:20-25 and 26:26-30, saying only that nothing of moment is varied. Their silence is reported, not filled in. ✦ Cambridge's most vivid material (the charoseth, the descent into the city) is quoted by Cambridge from Farrar and Edersheim, which is to say it is nineteenth century reconstruction of Passover practice from later Jewish sources, not evidence from Mark.
What is uncertain. Two discrepancies inside the sources are recorded rather than smoothed: ✦ Pulpit gives the Hallel as Psalm 108 to Psalm 118, where ✦ Cambridge and ✦ Gill simply say the Hallel and the usual range is Psalms 113 through 118; and ✦ Pulpit cites "Isaiah 41" among the Scriptures written of the Son of Man's death. Both look like misprints, and the tool has not silently corrected either. Whether Judas remained for the institution is disputed in the brief itself: ✦ Pulpit reports that most of the Fathers held he was present, ✦ Maclaren says there is no doubt that he partook, ✦ Cambridge has him leaving before the Eucharist is instituted, and ✦ Gill says he drank of the cup. Mark's own text does not say. Finally, the sense in which the bread is the body is left open above on purpose: ✦ Pulpit quotes Augustine that in sacraments one thing is seen and another understood, ✦ Gill calls the bread a figure and representation, and the machine layer has no warrant to decide between them.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)