From the sixth hour until the ninth hour darkness came over all the land.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai hektēs hōras genomenēs heōs enatēs hōras skotos egeneto eph’ holēn tēn gēn
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Death of Jesus
Mark 15:33–41 — The Death of Jesus. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
From the sixth hour until the ninth hour darkness came over all the land.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai hektēs hōras genomenēs heōs enatēs hōras skotos egeneto eph’ holēn tēn gēn
At the ninth hour, Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?” which means, “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai tē enatē hōra ho Iēsous eboēsen megalē phōnē Elōi Elōi lema sabachthani ho estin methermēneuomenon mou Ho Theos mou ho Theos eis ti enkatelipes me
When some of those standing nearby heard this, they said, “Behold, He is calling Elijah.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai tines tōn parestēkotōn akousantes elegon Ide phōnei Ēlian
And someone ran and filled a sponge with sour wine. He put it on a reed and held it up for Jesus to drink, saying, “Leave Him alone. Let us see if Elijah comes to take Him down.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de tis Dramōn kai gemisas spongon oxous peritheis kalamō epotizen auton legōn Aphete idōmen ei Ēlias erchetai kathelein auton
But Jesus let out a loud cry and breathed His last.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de Ho Iēsous apheis megalēn phōnēn exepneusen
And the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai to katapetasma tou naou eschisthē eis dyo ap’ anōthen heōs katō
When the centurion standing there in front of Jesus saw how He had breathed His last, he said, “Truly this man was the Son of God!”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de ho kentyriōn ho parestēkōs ex enantias autou Idōn hoti houtōs exepneusen eipen Alēthōs houtos ho anthrōpos ēn Huios Theou
And there were also women watching from a distance. Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joses, and Salome.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de Ēsan kai gynaikes theōrousai apo makrothen en hais kai Maria hē Magdalēnē kai Maria hē mētēr Iakōbou tou mikrou kai Iōsētos kai Salōmē
These women had followed Jesus and ministered to Him while He was in Galilee, and there were many other women who had come up to Jerusalem with Him.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
hai ēkolouthoun autō kai diēkonoun autō hote ēn en tē Galilaia kai pollai allai hai synanabasai eis Hierosolyma autō
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
Mark gives the darkness one sentence and no explanation. The verb is ἐγένετο, the flattest possible word for an event simply occurring, and the extent is ὅλην τὴν γῆν, which may mean the whole land or the whole earth. The commentators divide exactly along that seam: Geneva's marginal note (c) restricts it to Palestine and finds the wonder sharper for being local, "at the feast of the passover, and in the full moon"; Pulpit judges that "'Land' is a better rendering than 'earth'"; Gill reports that the Ethiopic version read it as the whole world. On cause they are equally divided and equally candid. Cambridge admits outright that "It is impossible to explain the origin of this darkness," rules out an eclipse on astronomical grounds (the Passover moon was full), and can only offer a guess. Pulpit reaches for Phlegon of Tralles as reported by Eusebius, and for a saying attributed to Dionysius at Heliopolis; both are secondhand and both are disputed, which is why we quote them as testimony about the tradition rather than as evidence about the event. Henry alone reads the darkness theologically: it "signified the cloud which the human soul of Christ was under, when he was making it an offering for sin." Cambridge adds the detail that gives the three hours their shape: "A veil hides from us the incidents of these three hours." ⚙ Mark, who elsewhere crowds his narrative with immediacy, here gives the reader nothing but a clock and a darkness.
Of the seven sayings from the cross gathered from the four Gospels, Cambridge notes that this is the only one Mark records, "and he gives the original Aramaic and its explanation." That double move is the heart of the verse: Ἐλωῒ Ἐλωῒ λεμὰ σαβαχθάνι, then μεθερμηνευόμενον, "being translated." Ellicott is precise about why Mark's spelling differs from Matthew's: Mark "is a closer reproduction of the very sounds of the Aramaic form of the word" while Matthew gives the Hebrew of Psalm 22:1. Gill, working from the other end, says both forms are used "and are both used in Psalm 22:1 , from whence the whole is taken." So the source is not in doubt among these commentators; only the transliteration is. Then the readings part company. Henry fixes on the object of the complaint: "He did not complain that his disciples forsook him, but that his Father forsook him." Geneva hears a conqueror mid-battle, "striving mightily with Satan, sin and death," who "clears himself, crying with a mighty voice." Benson holds both ends of the paradox in a single clause: in these very words "Jesus claims God as his God," while lamenting the withdrawal of the tokens of his love. The Pulpit Commentary goes further than the text and says so, supposing that our Lord recited the whole of Psalm 22 from the cross; it presents that as general supposition, not as report, and we record it at that weight. The crowd, meanwhile, hears one syllable and mistakes it. Cambridge sets out the three possibilities without pretending to decide: they caught only the first sound, or misunderstood, or "spoke in wilful mockery." What follows is a sponge of soldiers' posca on a reed, which Cambridge identifies as "the ordinary drink of the Roman soldiers" and Pulpit distinguishes from the narcotic given to the condemned. Gill connects it to Psalm 69:21. ⚙ Note the grammar of the jeer: the last imperative addressed to Jesus by any human being here is Ἄφετε, let be, and the next verb Mark writes of Jesus is ἀφεὶς, he let go.
Mark's report of the death is six Greek words, and two of them are unusual. Jesus does not simply cry out; he releases a great voice (ἀφεὶς, the verb of sending away), and he does not simply die; he breathes out (ἐξέπνευσεν), in the active voice. Cambridge collects the point through Farrar: the Evangelists avoid the neuter "He died" and choose phrases of yielding up, "as though they would imply with St Augustine that He gave up His life, 'quia voluit, quando voluit, quomodo voluit.'" Pulpit reasons from the physiology of dying men, who ordinarily lose their voices, to the same conclusion, that "he did not die of necessity, but voluntarily," and quotes John 10:18 and Victor Antiochanus in support. Cambridge hears in the loudness itself "the triumphant note of a conqueror"; Gill, following the Syriac, reads the death as a finishing of "his life, his days, his race, his ministry, and the work which was given him to do." Then, without a connecting word of explanation, the veil. Pulpit is careful about which one: two curtains hung in the sanctuary, the outer kalumma and the inner καταπέτασμα, and the one torn is the inner, the barrier of the holy of holies, so that the priest performing the evening office would have been standing between the two when it gave way. Cambridge supplies the dimensions from Josephus and refers the symbolism to Hebrews 9:3 and Hebrews 10:19. Henry states the double effect: terror to the unbelieving, comfort to believers, because it signified "the laying open a new and living way into the holiest by the blood of Jesus." Poole writes no Markan exposition at all here and says so, sending the reader to his notes on Matthew 27:51 and following. ⚙ The grammar carries the theology: ἐσχίσθη is passive with no agent named, and ἀπ’ ἄνωθεν is "from above." Nothing at the height of a man could have started that tear.
The first human being in Mark's Gospel to call Jesus the Son of God is a Roman officer doing his job. Ellicott notes that Mark, "after his manner, uses the actual Latin word" κεντυρίων where Matthew uses Greek, one of the small marks of a Gospel written toward Rome; Gill reminds us what the job was, to watch the condemned so that nobody released him. Benson locates the trigger in the manner of the dying: he cried out "with such strength of voice, and such firm confidence in God, even at the moment when he expired." Cambridge sets that against the soldier's own experience, death seen "on the battle-field, in the amphitheatre at Cæsarea, in tumultuous insurrections in Palestine," and concludes he had never before met "the majesty of a Voluntary Death." Pulpit adds a textual caution worth keeping: the words "so cried out" are absent from the strongest manuscripts he knows, so the evidence the centurion weighed may have been the manner of the death alone. The second witness is a group of women, and Mark's verbs make them permanent rather than incidental: the imperfects ἠκολούθουν and διηκόνουν, kept following and kept serving, and the rare compound συναναβᾶσαι, having come up with him. Geneva reads the contrast bluntly: "Christ, to the great shame of the men who forsook the Lord, chose women for his witnesses." Cambridge calls them "forerunners of the noble army of Holy Women." Gill specifies the service as material support out of their own substance (Luke 8:3), and Pulpit says they "were able to minister to the various needs of his humanity." Ellicott and Cambridge both note the difficulty in the list itself, Salome standing where Matthew has the mother of Zebedee's sons, and James called mikros, little, for reasons nobody can settle. ⚙ Mark names three women here, two of them again at the burial (15:47), and three again at the tomb (16:1). He is laying a chain of continuous eyewitnesses across the only three events his ending requires: that Jesus died, that he was buried, and that the tomb was empty.
⚙ This is the tool's own reading, fallible and offered to be tested against the text. Mark builds this unit out of two tearings and one mishearing. At the baptism the heavens were split (the cognate of ἐσχίσθη at Mark 1:10) and a voice said "You are My beloved Son"; here the veil is split and a man says "Truly this man was the Son of God." Between those two tearings, nobody in Mark's Gospel says that sentence and means it. Demons say it and are silenced, the heavenly voice says it twice, Peter gets near it and is rebuked within six verses. Then the curtain tears, from above, downward, and the confession comes out of the mouth of the executioner. We take that as the architecture of the passage: the barrier is removed from the far side, and the first result is a Gentile who can see. The darkness supports the same reading. Mark declines to explain it, and the commentators who try (Pulpit's Phlegon, Cambridge's atmospheric guess) are honest that they are guessing. What the text gives is a clock: darkness from the sixth hour, the cry at the ninth, which Cambridge identifies as the hour of the evening sacrifice. The lamb in the sanctuary and the man on the cross die at the same hour, and it is the sanctuary curtain that tears. We do not think Mark is arguing this; we think he is arranging it. And we notice what he does not resolve. The cry of Psalm 22:1 is left standing without a comforting gloss, and the loud voice of v. 37 is left without words. Geneva hears a conqueror there, Henry hears the sufferer at his lowest, and Mark supplies no adverb that would settle it. A reading that resolves that tension too quickly has probably stopped reading Mark. The line offered in the pull quote below is this tool's own sentence about the passage; it is not a verse of Scripture and should never be quoted as one.
The curtain tore downward, because nothing standing at the height of a man could have reached where that tear began.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The cry of v. 34 is the first verse of Psalm 22, spoken in Aramaic, with Mark's own Greek translation attached (μεθερμηνευόμενον). Gill states it without hedging: both forms of the divine address "are both used in Psalm 22:1 , from whence the whole is taken." Cambridge says Jesus "gives utterance to the words of the first verse of the xxiind Psalm." Ellicott explains the difference between Mark's and Matthew's spelling as a difference between the Aramaic sound and the Hebrew text. This is the one explicit Old Testament citation in the unit. ⚙ The Pulpit Commentary goes further and supposes that the whole psalm was recited from the cross; that is stated there as general supposition, and we do not adopt it.
Psalm 22:1
basis: Jesus quotes Psalm 22:1 verbatim in Aramaic and Mark translates it, so the quotation itself is not in doubt (Gill, Cambridge and Ellicott all name the source). The tier is nevertheless structural, not verbal, because the refs cross the Testaments: a Greek Gospel and a Hebrew Psalm share no Strong's lexemes, so the Verifier can compute no shared-lexeme basis for this pair and the house rule forbids a verbal tier on a mixed NT and OT thread.
Matthew 27:46 records the identical cry at the identical hour. The Verifier's computed basis is unusually strong: σαβαχθάνι (G4518) occurs in only two verses of the whole Greek New Testament, and those two verses are this one and Matthew's. The hour word hōra and the rare ordinal ennatos (10 verses) are shared as well. Ellicott's whole comment is built on comparing the two forms.
Matthew 27:46
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G4518 σαβαχθάνι (in 2 vv, effectively unique to this pair), G1766 ἔννατος (in 10 vv), G5610 ὥρα (in 99 vv). Both refs are New Testament, so a verbal tier is permitted; the rarity of σαβαχθάνι carries it.
Matthew 27:45 and Luke 23:44 report the same darkness over the same span. The Verifier records genuine shared vocabulary (skotos, hōra, gē, holos), but none of it is rare: σκότος stands in 29 verses, hōra in 99, holos in 97. ⚙ We therefore refuse the verbal tier here even though this is obviously a parallel account. Shared common nouns in a shared scene are evidence of a shared tradition, not of quotation.
Matthew 27:45 · Luke 23:44
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G4655 σκότος (in 29 vv), G5610 ὥρα (in 99 vv), G1093 γῆ (in 223 vv), G3650 ὅλος (in 97 vv). All are common words; deliberately downgraded from verbal to structural because no rare lexeme and no citation formula supports a quotation claim.
Amos 8:9 announces a day when God will cause the sun to go down at noon and darken the earth in broad daylight; Joel 2:2 calls the day of the LORD a day of darkness and gloom; Exodus 10:21 to 23 sets a three-day darkness over Egypt that could be felt while the Israelites had light. ⚙ Mark makes no citation and uses no fulfilment formula. We read the correspondence as figural and widely recognized rather than as a quotation, and the three prophetic texts stand behind the scene at different distances: Amos matches the detail of the hour most closely, Exodus supplies the pattern of judgment darkness, Joel the eschatological register.
Amos 8:9 · Joel 2:2 · Exodus 10:22
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek Gospel to Hebrew prophets), so no shared Strong's lexeme is computable and no verbal tier is available. The link is figural: darkness at midday as the sign of the day of judgment. Ancient and widely held as a reading; Mark himself supplies no citation, which is why this is tiered typological rather than confirmed quotation.
Matthew 27:48 and John 19:29 describe the same act with the same rare equipment. σπόγγος (G4699), a sponge, occurs in three verses of the New Testament and all three are this moment. ὄξος (G3690), the soldiers' sour wine, occurs in five. Cambridge identifies the liquid as posca and Pulpit insists it is not the stupefying drink offered to the condemned. John adds the detail of hyssop, which Gill and Pulpit both take to be the stalk Mark calls a reed.
Matthew 27:48 · John 19:29
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G4699 σπόγγος (in 3 vv), G3690 ὄξος (in 5 vv), G4060 περιτίθημι (in 8 vv), G2563 κάλαμος (in 12 vv), G5143 τρέχω (in 17 vv). All refs are New Testament. σπόγγος at three verses is effectively unique to this scene, which carries the verbal tier.
Gill states the connection directly at this verse: they gave him to drink, "and so fulfilled a prophecy in Psalm 69:21 ." Psalm 69 is among the psalms most often read messianically in the New Testament. ⚙ Mark himself writes no fulfilment formula here; John does at the parallel moment. We record Gill's identification as a reading of the event, and tier it accordingly.
Psalm 69:21
basis: Cross-Testament, so no shared Strong's lexeme is computable and a verbal tier is excluded. The shared element is the concrete motif of sour drink offered to a sufferer, named as a fulfilment by Gill at this verse. Mark supplies no citation formula, so the basis is the motif plus the commentator's identification, not a quotation in the text.
Luke 23:45 reports the same event with the same two uncommon words: σχίζω (G4977, to split) and καταπέτασμα (G2665, the inner veil), together with naos for the sanctuary proper rather than the temple precinct. Luke places the tearing before the death, Mark after it; the vocabulary is nonetheless shared and distinctive.
Luke 23:45
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G2665 καταπέτασμα (in 6 vv), G4977 σχίζω (in 9 vv), G3485 ναός (in 39 vv). Both refs are New Testament. Two uncommon, technically specific lexemes in one clause support the verbal tier; note honestly that the two accounts differ on the sequence relative to the death.
The καταπέτασμα is not a decoration. Exodus 26:31 to 33 commissions the veil of blue, purple and scarlet, worked with cherubim, and says exactly what it is for: it shall divide for you between the holy place and the most holy. Exodus 36:35 records its making; Leviticus 16:2 warns Aaron not to come at any time behind it, on pain of death. Cambridge sends the reader to Hebrews 9:3 and Hebrews 10:19 "for the full symbolism of this," and Pulpit identifies the torn veil as the inner one specifically. Henry names the consequence: a new and living way into the holiest.
Exodus 26:33 · Leviticus 16:2 · Hebrews 10:19
basis: Refs mix Old and New Testament, so no verbal tier is available and no shared Strong's lexeme is computable between the Hebrew and Greek members. The link is figural and institutional: the object Mark names is the object Exodus commissions and Leviticus guards, and Hebrews 10:19 to 20 reads the curtain as the flesh of Christ. Widely held from the patristic period onward; Cambridge names Hebrews as the key, so the reading is not ours alone.
Mark names Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Joses, and Salome at the cross (15:40); Mary Magdalene and Mary of Joses at the burial (15:47); and Mary Magdalene, Mary of James and Salome at the tomb (16:1). The Verifier finds the link in the names themselves, and two of them are among the rarest words in the New Testament: Σαλώμη stands in two verses and Ἰωσῆς in three. ⚙ This is not a thematic echo but a deliberate roster, repeated with small variations across the three scenes Mark's ending depends on.
Mark 15:47 · Mark 16:1
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G4539 Σαλώμη (in 2 vv), G2500 Ἰωσῆς (in 3 vv), G3094 Μαγδαληνή (in 12 vv), G2385 Ἰάκωβος (in 38 vv), G2334 θεωρέω (in 56 vv). All refs are within Mark. Two lexemes of extreme rarity plus the repeated watching verb make this a verbal link in the strict sense.
Mark 15:41 describes the women as συναναβᾶσαι, having gone up together with him to Jerusalem. The verb synanabainō occurs in exactly two verses of the New Testament. The other is Acts 13:31, where Paul tells the synagogue at Antioch that Jesus appeared for many days to those who came up with him from Galilee to Jerusalem, and that these are now his witnesses to the people. Both verses also carry Γαλιλαία. ⚙ The verbal coincidence is exact and, as far as we can see, unremarked by the commentators in this brief; we offer it as a real lexical observation, not as proof that Luke had Mark's sentence in view.
Acts 13:31
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G4872 συναναβαίνω (in 2 vv, so this pair exhausts its New Testament occurrences) and G1056 Γαλιλαία (in 60 vv). Both refs are New Testament. The verbal tier rests on the near-unique compound verb and the shared Galilee-to-Jerusalem itinerary; it is a lexical link, and we make no claim about literary dependence.
Mark 6:3 names the brothers of Jesus as James, Joses, Judas and Simon, and Mark 15:40 names a Mary who is the mother of James the little and of Joses. The shared names are real and the rarity of Ἰωσῆς (three verses) is real. The identification is not. Cambridge states flatly that this Mary is "Mary of Clopas" of John 19:25, sister of the Blessed Virgin; Pulpit follows him; Gill treats "the little" simply as a common Jewish way of distinguishing two men named James and offers rabbinic parallels; Cambridge himself lists three incompatible explanations of the epithet. ⚙ We record the lexical overlap and refuse the identification.
Mark 6:3
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G2500 Ἰωσῆς (in 3 vv), G2385 Ἰάκωβος (in 38 vv), G5207 υἱός (in 344 vv). The lexical basis is genuine, but the inference commonly drawn from it, that the Mary of 15:40 is to be identified with a particular named woman elsewhere, is contested among the very commentators in this brief and is not stated by Mark. Flagged so the reader checks the identification rather than inheriting it.
Psalm 38:11 describes those who love the sufferer standing off at a distance while his kinsmen stand far away. Mark's phrase is ἀπὸ μακρόθεν, a doubled "from afar," applied to the women. ⚙ The correspondence is a matter of posture, not of wording, and the pressure runs both ways: for the psalmist the distance is abandonment, while Pulpit argues that these women "came as near as they could" and were kept back by the soldiers. We offer the echo at low confidence and let the tension stand.
Psalm 38:11
basis: Cross-Testament, so no shared Strong's lexeme is computable and no verbal tier is possible. The shared element is the pattern of the sufferer's own people watching from a distance. No commentator in this brief draws the link, and the sense of the distance differs between the two texts, so the claim is limited to the pattern.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
The grammar of v. 34 holds two things at once and neither commentator in this brief lets go of either. ἐγκατέλιπές is a real aorist: something was actually done. And Ὁ Θεός μου is a real possessive, said twice. Benson takes exactly that double grip: in these words "Jesus claims God as his God," while lamenting his Father's withdrawing the tokens of his love, "while he bare our sins." Henry makes the object of the complaint precise: not that the disciples fled, but that the Father forsook him, and "In this especially he was made sin for us." Geneva describes the same moment as a battle with Satan, sin and death "all three armed with the horrible curse of God." Barnes, commenting on the character of the death, insists on the distinction that keeps the doctrine honest: it does not mean "that God regarded him as a sinner," but that he died "the 'just' for the 'unjust'." ⚙ Mark does not explain the cry and does not soften it. What he does is keep the Aramaic and translate it, as if to say that the reader must hear the sound before receiving the meaning.
Psalm 22:1 · Isaiah 53:12 · 2 Corinthians 5:21
Exodus commissioned the curtain precisely as a divider between the holy and the most holy (Exodus 26:33) and Leviticus made going behind it a capital matter except on one day a year (Leviticus 16:2). Mark reports it split, passively, agentless, ἀπ’ ἄνωθεν, from above. Cambridge refers the symbolism to Hebrews 9:3 and Hebrews 10:19. Pulpit spells out both consequences he sees in it, that the ceremonial dispensation is unfolded and the middle wall of partition broken down so that Gentiles also may draw near, and that "the way to heaven was laid open by our Lord's death." Henry says the same in the register of comfort: it signified "the laying open a new and living way into the holiest by the blood of Jesus." Hebrews 10:19 to 20 makes the identification the commentators are leaning on, that the new and living way is opened through the curtain, that is, through his flesh. ⚙ The direction of the tear is the whole argument: from above, downward, at the hour of the evening sacrifice, and no hand is named.
Hebrews 10:19 · Hebrews 9:3 · Exodus 26:33 · Leviticus 16:2
Mark opens his book "the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God" (Mark 1:1), and then withholds that confession from every human mouth for fifteen chapters. The voice from heaven says it at the baptism and the transfiguration; unclean spirits say it and are silenced; Peter reaches the edge of it and is rebuked. The first human being in this Gospel to say it, and to say it as a verdict, is a Roman officer who has just watched the man die, and Mark gives him the adverb Ἀληθῶς, truly. Cambridge draws out the significance without the literary frame, placing him with the centurion of Matthew 8 and Cornelius of Acts 10 as "a triumvirate of believing Gentile soldiers," and saying that in the manner of that death "All that he had dimly believed of heroes and demigods is transfigured." Benson traces the confession to the strength of the voice and the confidence in God at the moment of expiring. Gill notes that the same confession came from the soldiers with him. ⚙ The reading that the centurion's line answers Mark 1:1 as the closing bracket of the book is a literary observation, ours and many modern readers', not a claim any commentator in this brief makes. The confession's christological weight is ancient; the bracket is the part we mark as novel.
Mark 1:1 · Mark 1:11 · Mark 9:7 · Acts 10:1-2
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text. Scripture is the Berean Standard Bible; the interlinear, parsing and Strong's numbers are the Berean data supplied in the brief. Two textual points inside this unit are worth the reader's attention. At v. 39 Pulpit records that the words "so cried out" are absent from the manuscripts he regards as most important; the Berean text used here retains them, so the reader is seeing a reading that is not universally attested. At v. 34 the Aramaic is transliterated, and Mark's spelling differs from Matthew's; Ellicott explains the difference as Aramaic sound against Hebrew text, while Gill calls both forms Hebrew. We have not adjudicated that.
Sources. Ten commentators are present in the brief and nine are quoted here: Benson, Henry, Barnes, Poole, Gill, Geneva, Cambridge, Pulpit and Ellicott. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown are present but supply only section headings for this passage, pointing the reader to their notes on John 19 and Matthew 27; there is no Markan comment of theirs to quote, and we have not manufactured one. Poole likewise writes no independent exposition here and says so, which is why we quote his deferral rather than a comment he did not make. Barnes' block as supplied is a note on "numbered with the transgressors" (Mark 15:28, Isaiah 53:12) repeated by the source under every verse of this unit; we quote it once, at v. 37, and label it.
Transmission defects in the source text. At v. 39 the Cambridge entry reads "a (or the ) Song of Solomon of God." This is almost certainly an automated Scripture-reference substitution in the digitized source, replacing the word "Son" with a book name; Cambridge's own sentence will have read "Son of God." We have not quoted the corrupted clause. At v. 36 Pulpit's text reads "posen" where Cambridge, describing the same drink, gives "posca"; we quote Pulpit as transmitted and flag the discrepancy. Pulpit's citation "John 21:28" in that same note appears to be an error for John 19:28.
What is uncertain. The cause and extent of the darkness are not stated by Mark and are not settled by the commentators: Cambridge concedes that explanation is impossible, Pulpit's supporting testimonies (Phlegon of Tralles by way of Eusebius, a saying attributed to Dionysius at Heliopolis, remarks of Cyprian and Chrysostom) are secondhand and disputed, and Geneva restricts the darkness to Palestine while Gill records an Ethiopic reading of the whole world. The identity of "Mary the mother of James the little and of Joses" is contested; we have flagged the thread accordingly. The sequence of the veil's tearing relative to the death differs between Mark and Luke. Pulpit's supposition that the whole of Psalm 22 was recited from the cross is presented in that source as supposition and is not adopted here.
What is machine synthesis. Every literal rendering, divergence, word note marked ⚙, the sola reading, the pull quote and all thread bases and tiers are this tool's own fallible work, built on the brief's sourced data. Where a claim is ours and not a commentator's, we have tried to say so in the sentence itself. The link between the split heavens of Mark 1:10 and the split veil of 15:38, the observation about aphete and apheis across vv. 36 and 37, the Acts 13:31 lexical thread, and the reading of the centurion's confession as the closing bracket of Mark 1:1 are all ours; none is asserted by a commentator in this brief.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)