As soon as Jesus was alone with the Twelve and those around Him, they asked Him about the parable.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai hote egeneto kata monas tois dōdeka syn hoi peri auton ērōtōn auton tas parabolas
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Purpose of Jesus’ Parables
Mark 4:10–12 — The Purpose of Jesus’ Parables. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
As soon as Jesus was alone with the Twelve and those around Him, they asked Him about the parable.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai hote egeneto kata monas tois dōdeka syn hoi peri auton ērōtōn auton tas parabolas
He replied, “The mystery of the kingdom of God has been given to you, but to those on the outside everything is expressed in parables,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai elegen autois to mystērion tēs basileias tou Theou dedotai Hymin de ekeinois tois exō ta panta ginetai en parabolais
so that, ‘they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never understanding; otherwise they might turn and be forgiven.’”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
hina Blepontes blepōsin kai mē idōsin Kai akouontes akouōsin kai mē syniōsin Mē pote epistrepsōsin Kai aphethē autois
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
Mark alone records who asked. Ellicott notes that where Matthew has simply “the disciples,” here “the presence of others besides the Twelve is directly asserted,” and Pulpit says the same, adding that “besides the twelve, there were seventy other disciples.” JFB reads the second group as “probably those who followed Him most closely and were firmest in discipleship, next to the Twelve,” while Gill wonders whether they were those who later became the seventy. Maclaren turns the observation into an architecture: Christ at the centre of three circles, the crowd outermost, then the loosely attached, then the Twelve. ⚙ The Greek supports two named groups and implies the third: οἱ περὶ αὐτὸν σὺν τοῖς δώδεκα, those around Him together with the Twelve, the preposition σύν (G4862) binding more tightly than μετά would. And the verb is imperfect, ἠρώτων: they kept asking. Pulpit further records that the best text has the plural τὰς παραβολάς, so the question was not “what does the sower mean?” but “why do You teach like this?” Cambridge places the scene after the crowds were dismissed, reading Mark as anticipating Matthew 13:36; Gill and Barnes agree only on the plain sense, that He had withdrawn.
The answer begins with a perfect passive. Pulpit reports the textual fact that decides its shape: “The Greek verb γνῶναι, to know, is not found in the best manuscripts,” so the sentence runs “to you the mystery of the kingdom of God has been given.” Not knowledge about the mystery: the mystery. δέδοται (G1325) is perfect, a completed gift with a standing result, and it names no giver, which Pulpit supplies from the wider canon: “it is his own gift which he bestows on the disciples of Christ, and denies to others.” Cambridge does the lexical work on μυστήριον (G3466, a rare word, 27 verses), distinguishing the initiation rites of Eleusis from the biblical sense and applying the word here to the Gospel itself, with 1 Corinthians 2:7, Romans 16:25 and Ephesians 1:9. Ellicott notes that the phrase for the second group, τοῖς ἔξω, “is peculiar to St. Mark”; Geneva glosses it “strangers, and such ones as are not of us”; Benson recalls that the Jews used it of the heathen and extends it to obstinate unbelief. Gill describes the effect with care: the sayings are “wrapped up in dark sayings, and figurative expressions,” heard, even enjoyed, and not understood. ⚙ One grammatical detail deserves more than it usually gets. The verb in the second half, γίνεται (G1096), is the same root Mark used a verse earlier of Jesus coming to be alone. For those outside, the whole of it comes to be in parables. Something happens to the teaching on the way across.
Maclaren does not flinch: “The statement of His reason for the use of parables is startling. It sounds as if those who needed light most were to get least of it.” His own resolution is that a parable by nature both reveals and hides, that the eye may dwell on the coloured glass or on the light through it, and that both effects, being foreseen, must be embraced in Christ’s purpose, though he then distinguishes design from desire. Ellicott takes a different road: Mark “characteristically gives the words of Isaiah 6:9, but not as a quotation,” and the apparent purpose is Hebrew idiom, “the acceptance of a foreseen result” stated as intention. Benson states the sequence that both readings assume: “They would not see before; now they could not.” Cambridge reads the parables as at once attractive and penal, penal in “withdrawing the light from such as loved darkness and were wilfully blind.” ⚙ Three grammatical facts should be kept in front of any reader weighing these: the doubled participles (Βλέποντες βλέπωσιν, ἀκούοντες ἀκούωσιν) are Semitic emphasis, not Greek style; the negated verbs shift root, from surface looking to recognition (ὁράω) and from hearing to putting together (συνίημι, G4920, 25 verses); and ἐπιστρέψωσιν is active, which Pulpit presses: the sinner is not said to be prevented from being turned, he is said not to turn. The final verb, ἀφεθῇ, is passive and, in the best text, objectless. Mark has already told us who lets sins go on earth.
⚙ Offered to be tested, and fallible. Read Mark 4:10-12 inside Mark rather than inside a system, and two things hold at once. First, the division is real and God-made: δέδοται is a perfect passive with no agent but one, and nothing in v. 10 suggests the inner circle earned its place, since they are there asking because they did not understand either. Second, the shut door is never described as bolted from inside the house. The verb of turning is active. The verb of forgiveness is passive and its object is omitted, so the clause names forgiveness itself as the unreached thing, and Mark 2:5-10 has already declared that the Son of Man has authority on earth to grant exactly that. So the ἵνα of v. 12, whatever else it means, cannot mean that Jesus wished the forgiveness withheld, because Mark has him giving it away in chapter 2 and dying for it in chapter 14. ⚙ My reading, weaker than Maclaren's and stronger than Ellicott's: the parable is a form of mercy that has become a form of judgment, and it does so by leaving the hearer free. It does not argue; it waits. To a hearer who will not come and ask, it is a story and nothing more, and that is precisely the verdict, because the failure at v. 12 is συνίημι, the failure to put the pieces together, and the remedy for that failure is what the Twelve are doing at v. 10: asking. Mark's own warning against complacency comes at 8:17-21, where he charges the identical failure against the Twelve themselves. Whoever is inside is inside by gift and stays there by asking.
The parable does not argue; it waits. (This line is synthesis, not Scripture.)
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
Verse 12 is Isaiah 6:9-10 in all but the formula of citation. Ellicott states the point exactly: Mark “characteristically gives the words of Isaiah 6:9, but not as a quotation, and perhaps in a less accurate form,” and Gill simply notes, “The passage referred to is in Isaiah 6:9.” In Isaiah the words are part of a prophet’s commission: he is sent to a people whose hearing will only confirm them. ⚙ Mark’s final clause is the telling difference. Where the Septuagint of Isaiah 6:10 ends in healing, Mark ends in forgiveness being let go for them (ἀφεθῇ αὐτοῖς), and Pulpit records that the best text omits “their sins.” That wording sits closer to the Aramaic Targum’s rendering of the verse than to the Greek Old Testament, a textual point taken up in the apparatus below.
Isaiah 6:9 · Isaiah 6:10
basis: The link is a formally near verbatim echo, attested by Ellicott and Gill, but it cannot be tiered verbal here: the refs cross the Testaments, so no shared Strong's lexeme can be computed (Greek Mark against Hebrew Isaiah), and the Verifier records no lexical basis. Tiered structural and stated plainly: this is a quotation in substance whose verbal basis is not machine-checkable across languages.
Matthew 13:11-15 and Luke 8:10 carry the same exchange, and the differences are the sort a reader should see. Ellicott notes that Mark’s “them that are without” is peculiar to him, Matthew giving “to them” and Luke “to the rest”; Mark has the singular mystery where Matthew and Luke have the plural; and Matthew 13:13 replaces Mark’s ἵνα with the causal ὅτι, then quotes Isaiah in full and formally at 13:14-15. JFB and Barnes both simply refer the reader to Matthew 13:10-17. The Verifier confirms the lexical overlap.
Matthew 13:11 · Matthew 13:13 · Matthew 13:15 · Luke 8:10
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G3466 μυστήριον (rare, in 27 vv), G4920 συνίημι (rare, in 25 vv), G1994 ἐπιστρέφω (in 35 vv), G3850 παραβολή (in 48 vv), G1325 δίδωμι (in 378 vv), G932 βασιλεία (in 154 vv). Two rare lexemes plus a shared saying within the Synoptic tradition; all refs are New Testament, so the verbal tier is available.
Luke closes Acts with Paul in Rome pronouncing Isaiah 6:9-10 over those who would not be persuaded, and the Verifier finds the same rare vocabulary of failed understanding and unturned hearts. ⚙ The placement matters: what Jesus says over a Galilean crowd in Mark 4, Paul says over Rome at the end of the apostolic mission, which makes the saying not a local incident but the shape of the word’s reception through the whole book. Barnes points the reader in a third direction, to John 12:39-40, where the same Isaiah text is applied to those who saw the signs and did not believe.
Acts 28:26 · Acts 28:27
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G1994 ἐπιστρέφω (in 35 vv), G4920 συνίημι (rare, in 25 vv), G991 βλέπω (in 117 vv), G191 ἀκούω (in 398 vv). Both passages render the same Isaiah oracle in Greek, and both refs are New Testament, so the verbal tier applies. John 12:39-40, named by Barnes in the body, is not listed here because the Verifier supplies no computed basis for it.
Mark’s phrase joins two words that Daniel 2 holds together: a mystery that no wise man, enchanter or astrologer can produce (Daniel 2:27), which the God of heaven reveals (Daniel 2:28-30), concerning a kingdom that will not be destroyed, so that the pagan king confesses Israel’s God as a revealer of mysteries (Daniel 2:47). ⚙ In Daniel the mystery is disclosed to a single faithful man and hidden from the professionals of the court; in Mark 4:11 it is given to a circle of fishermen and hidden from those who are technically inside Israel’s religion. Cambridge, reading the Greek word, applies it not to Daniel but to the Gospel itself and to 1 Corinthians 2:7 and Ephesians 1:9. The Daniel connection here is my own reading, offered as motif, not as citation.
Daniel 2:27 · Daniel 2:28 · Daniel 2:47
basis: No shared Strong's number is possible: the link crosses Testaments and languages (Greek Mark against Hebrew and Aramaic Daniel), and the Verifier lists no candidate here. The recorded basis is a shared motif, a mystery concerning a kingdom which human wisdom cannot reach and God discloses to a chosen few. No quotation is claimed.
Mark builds a habit out of this scene. At 4:34 he tells us that Jesus spoke to the crowd only in parables and explained everything privately to His disciples; at 7:17, when He had entered a house away from the crowd, they ask Him about the parable in the same words; at 12:12 the leaders perceive that He spoke a parable against them and go away. ⚙ Read together, the pattern says what v. 11 says structurally: the dividing line in Mark is not education but proximity and inquiry, and Mark places the Twelve on the wrong side of comprehension at 8:17-21 to keep the reader from resting in the privilege of v. 11.
Mark 4:34 · Mark 7:17 · Mark 12:12
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G3850 παραβολή (in 48 vv) and G3753 ὅτε (in 102 vv) with Mark 7:17, and G3850 παραβολή with Mark 12:12. Neither lexeme is rare enough to carry a verbal tier on its own and no quotation is involved, so the link is recorded as a repeated narrative pattern within one Gospel, deliberately tiered structural rather than verbal.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ The perfect passive of v. 11 gives the disciples a thing, not a topic: “to you the mystery of the kingdom of God has been given,” with Pulpit noting that the best manuscripts have no verb “to know.” Cambridge, working on the word itself, applies μυστήριον to the Gospel and cites 1 Corinthians 2:7, Romans 16:25 and Ephesians 1:9, where Paul names the mystery as hidden before the ages and now made known, and as the will of God set forth in Christ. ⚙ Follow that line and the disclosure and the thing disclosed are the same: the reign of God has come near in the person standing in the boat, which is why the mystery is singular in Mark, and why it can be given rather than merely taught. Colossians 2:2-3 makes the identification explicit, the mystery of God being Christ himself. This is the apostolic reading, and Cambridge records it.
1 Corinthians 2:7 · Ephesians 1:9 · Colossians 2:2 · Romans 16:25
⚙ Isaiah 6 begins with a throne and a seraphic Sanctus and ends with a commission to preach to people who will not perceive. John, quoting the same verses at John 12:40, adds at 12:41 that Isaiah said these things because he saw His glory and spoke of Him. Barnes sends the reader of Mark 4:12 to exactly that passage. ⚙ If John is right, then the Lord whose word hardened Judah in the temple vision is the same Lord teaching from the boat, and the hardening oracle in Mark is not a new severity but the continuation of a single ministry of the word, now standing in a body. That is what makes the ending different: in Isaiah the word is spoken from a throne, in Mark it is sown by a man who will be rejected by the very hearing He describes.
Isaiah 6:1 · John 12:40 · John 12:41
⚙ A Markan observation, offered as my own and testable by anyone with a concordance. The last verb of v. 12 is ἀφεθῇ (G863), and Pulpit records that the best text omits “their sins,” leaving the bare “it should be forgiven them.” Two chapters earlier Mark had staked his whole Christology on that verb: the paralytic is told his sins are forgiven, the scribes ask who can forgive but God alone, and Jesus answers that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins (Mark 2:5-10). ⚙ So v. 12 does not describe a forgiveness that is unavailable; it describes people not walking through a door Mark has already shown open, and standing in that doorway is the one who says the hardening words. The severity of v. 12 and the mercy of Mark 2 are the same person, which is the strongest argument the Gospel itself makes against reading the ἵνα as a wish for their ruin.
Mark 2:5 · Mark 2:7 · Mark 2:10
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text. Three readings shape this unit, all recorded by the Pulpit Commentary from the manuscript evidence available to its editors. (1) At 4:10 the best reading is the plural τὰς παραβολάς, “the parables,” against the singular behind BSB’s “the parable.” (2) At 4:11 the verb γνῶναι, “to know,” is absent from the best manuscripts, so the clause reads “to you the mystery of the kingdom of God has been given,” not “to know the mystery.” BSB follows this shorter text. (3) At 4:12 τὰ ἁμαρτήματα, “their sins,” is omitted, leaving the impersonal “and it should be forgiven them.”
The Isaiah form. Mark’s final clause ends in forgiveness, where the Septuagint of Isaiah 6:10 ends in healing; the wording is commonly held to stand closer to the Aramaic Targum of Isaiah, which reads in terms of forgiveness, than to the Greek Old Testament. That observation is not supplied by any commentator in this brief and is not machine verified here; it is reported as the standard text-critical judgement and should be checked against a critical edition of the Targum before being relied on. Ellicott says only that Mark gives the words of Isaiah 6:9 “not as a quotation, and perhaps in a less accurate form.”
Sources. The commentary entries for Matthew Henry and Albert Barnes on all three verses are block notes on Mark 4:1-20 and cross-references to Matthew 13 rather than verse-level comment, so they are cited here sparingly and by their actual content. Matthew Poole’s entries on all three verses are pointers to his note on Mark 4:3 and contain no comment on this unit; he is therefore not quoted. The Maclaren entry is capped in this brief at its first portion, and only that portion has been used.
What is uncertain. The force of ἵνα in v. 12 is the live question, and this unit does not settle it. The particle is telic in ordinary Greek usage; Matthew 13:13 has causal ὅτι; Ellicott resolves it by Hebrew idiom, Benson by prior refusal, Maclaren by distinguishing design from desire, Cambridge by calling the parables penal as well as attractive. Every one of those is an interpretation laid over the grammar, and the synthesis above says so rather than choosing for the reader. The Daniel 2 thread carries no computed lexical basis and is tiered accordingly.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)