Then Jesus said to them, “Do you not understand this parable? Then how will you understand any of the parables?
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai legei autois Ouk oidate tautēn tēn parabolēn kai pōs gnōsesthe pasas tas parabolas
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Parable of the Sower Explained
Mark 4:13–20 — The Parable of the Sower Explained. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
Then Jesus said to them, “Do you not understand this parable? Then how will you understand any of the parables?
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai legei autois Ouk oidate tautēn tēn parabolēn kai pōs gnōsesthe pasas tas parabolas
The farmer sows the word.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Ho speirōn speirei ton logon
Some are like the seeds along the path, where the word is sown. As soon as they hear it, Satan comes and takes away the word that was sown in them.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de houtoi eisin hoi para tēn hodon hopou ho logos speiretai kai euthys hotan akousōsin ho Satanas erchetai kai airei ton logon ton esparmenon eis autous
Some are like the seeds sown on rocky ground. They hear the word and at once receive it with joy.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai houtoi eisin homoiōs hoi speiromenoi epi ta petrōdē hoi hotan akousōsin ton logon euthys lambanousin auton meta charas
But they themselves have no root, and they remain for only a season. When trouble or persecution comes because of the word, they quickly fall away.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai echousin en heautois ouk rhizan alla eisin proskairoi eita thlipseōs ē diōgmou genomenēs dia ton logon euthys skandalizontai
Others are like the seeds sown among the thorns. They hear the word,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai alloi eisin hoi speiromenoi eis tas akanthas houtoi eisin hoi akousantes ton logon
but the worries of this life, the deceitfulness of wealth, and the desire for other things come in and choke the word, and it becomes unfruitful.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai hai merimnai tou aiōnos kai hē apatē tou ploutou kai hai epithymiai peri ta loipa eisporeuomenai sympnigousin ton logon kai ginetai akarpos
Still others are like the seeds sown on good soil. They hear the word, receive it, and produce a crop—thirtyfold, sixtyfold, or a hundredfold.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai ekeinoi eisin hoi sparentes epi tēn tēn kalēn gēn hoitines akouousin ton logon kai paradechontai kai karpophorousin hen triakonta kai hen hexēkonta kai hen hekaton
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
⚙ Mark alone records the second question, and Ellicott, Cambridge and Pulpit all say so. It is built on two different verbs: οἴδατε is perfect, the knowledge you already possess, and γνώσεσθε is future middle from γινώσκω, the knowledge that comes by working at a thing. BSB renders both “understand,” so the English reader cannot see that Jesus moves from a settled grasp to a growing one. Ellicott hears in the future “an ever-growing insight,” not only into spoken parables but into those of nature and of life. Barnes gives the reason the question is sharper for these hearers than for the crowd: they were themselves to be teachers. JFB reads the tone against the grain of the word “rebuke,” taking it as a summons to attend to the exposition about to be given. Cambridge and Benson agree on why this parable and not another is the test case: it is the simplest pattern of a parable, and, in Benson's phrase, the foundation of all those that follow.
⚙ Five Greek words: Ὁ σπείρων σπείρει τὸν λόγον. The subject is a participle, “the sowing one,” an agent identified only by what he does, and BSB's “The farmer” supplies a noun the Greek withholds. JFB makes this reticence the point: since the seed is the word of God, every scatterer of that seed must be regarded as a sower, and though Matthew 13:37 names the Son of Man as the sower of good seed, those are the great unseen parties, whose agents among men are the preachers. Cambridge widens it in three steps, to Christ who came forth from the Father, to his Apostles, and to all who go in his name. Gill spends his note not on the sower but on the seed, unfolding λόγος as the word of life and truth, of peace and reconciliation, of faith and righteousness, of salvation, all of it in and by Jesus Christ; Pulpit adds Matthew's fuller title, “the word of the kingdom.” The one constant of the next six verses is set here: eight occurrences of λόγος in eight verses, one seed, four grounds.
⚙ The first failure is theft. αἴρει (G142) is to lift up and carry off what lies loose, and JFB's reading turns on exactly that: the word makes no impression but lies loosely on the surface until the wicked one finds some frivolous subject to draw the attention away. Henry's image is the older one, the devil busy about careless hearers as the fowls of the air go about seed lying above ground; Pulpit locates the hardness in habit, a heart rendered callous by the custom of sinning. Two grammatical facts keep this from being a story about a careless moment. The participle ἐσπαρμένον is perfect: the word really was sown into them, and stays described that way after it is gone. And Ellicott notes the textual point, that the better manuscripts read simply “in them,” not “in their hearts.”
⚙ The second failure is depth. τὰ πετρώδη is rock-like places, sheet rock under a skin of earth, and the missing thing is named once: ῥίζαν, root. Gill distinguishes the word lodged in the natural affections from the root of grace, “no heart work, only speculative notions, and flashy affections”; Pulpit grants this hearer real delight in the beauty, justice and purity of the word, and then says he has more of the rock than of the good soil. What English hides is that πρόσκαιροί is a predicate adjective, not a statement of duration: they are temporary, of the passing kind, a word used in only four verses of the Greek canon. Cambridge digs into θλῖψις as pressure that burdens the spirit, noting that “tribulation” carries the threshing roller, tribulum, in its own history. And the last verb is passive: σκανδαλίζονται, they are tripped, entrapped, which is the same verb Mark will use of those offended at Jesus in 6:3 and of the disciples in 14:27. Henry's summary is blunt and worth keeping: impressions that are not deep will not last.
⚙ Pulpit catches the textual signal at the head of 4:18: the best authorities read καὶ ἄλλοι, “and others,” where the two earlier soils were introduced with “these,” and this marks a considerable difference between the classes. The preposition shifts too: the seed goes εἰς the thorns, into them, where 4:16 and 4:20 have ἐπί, upon. Nothing in this ground refuses or starves the seed. It has company. Cambridge takes μέριμναι at its root as distracting anxieties that cut a man in sunder, and Pulpit insists on the literal τοῦ αἰῶνος, “of the age,” temporal cares incident to the era in which one's lot is cast. Gill reads ἀπάτη as riches that are deceitful, especially when trusted in, and which once obtained do not give the satisfaction they promised; Pulpit compares riches to thorns because they pierce, and cites Paul at 1 Timothy 6:10. Benson takes the third rival, the desires concerning other things, as the most searching of all, since any desire not leading to happiness in God tends directly to barrenness of soul, and since such desires enter where they were not before. The verb that kills is συμπνίγουσιν, choke together, strangle, a word in only five verses; JFB's picture of what is left after the strangling is the most quotable thing any of these commentators says here, a fagged, hurried and heartless formalism that is at length all the religion of such persons.
⚙ The grammar changes at the last soil. The participle is aorist passive, σπαρέντες, “those who were sown,” against the present participles of the two failing soils; the hearing is present indicative, ἀκούουσιν, still going on, against the aorist participle of 4:18; and the receiving is the compound παραδέχονται, to welcome alongside, against the plainer λαμβάνουσιν that the rocky soil also managed. JFB describes the resulting heart as soft and tender, stirred to its depths on the great things of eternity and jealously guarded from worldly engrossments, and adds from Luke that it bears fruit with patience. Gill will not let the fruit be a human achievement: such hearers are made good men by the grace of God, for there is none good naturally. The threefold yield is read the same way by all of them: JFB takes thirty as the lowest and a hundred as the highest degree, Pulpit reports Jerome's symmetry of three bad conditions against three grades of good, and Gill states the principle exactly, that all bring forth good fruit of the same quality though not of the same quantity. JFB notes that a hundredfold is a rare return in ordinary husbandry, pointing to Genesis 26:12. Henry ends where the unit's own logic ends, asking that by God's new-creating grace our hearts may become good ground.
⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested against the text. Count the verbs. Hearing happens in all four grounds: ἀκούσωσιν at 4:15, ἀκούσωσιν at 4:16, ἀκούσαντες at 4:18, ἀκούουσιν at 4:20. Joy happens (4:16, μετὰ χαρᾶς). Growth happens, since 4:19 can only say ἄκαρπος of a plant that had something to choke. So the parable does not separate hearers into those who received the word and those who did not; it separates them by what became of a word that was genuinely sown into every one of them, and the perfect participle ἐσπαρμένον in 4:15 is the text's own insistence on that.
⚙ Then notice who acts. Almost every decisive verb about the sowing is passive or agentless: the word is sown (4:15), they are being sown (4:16, 4:18), they were sown (4:20), they are tripped up (4:17). The active verbs belong either to the adversary (Satan comes and lifts away, 4:15), to the intruders (the anxieties, the deceit and the desires enter in and choke, 4:19), or, once only, to the good ground itself: they hear, they welcome, they bear fruit (4:20). The parable therefore reads as an account of a field under two kinds of pressure with one kind of seed, and it never once says how bad ground becomes good. That silence is the gap, and we will not fill it from this text. What the text does say is that the only soil credited with an active verb of fruit is the one described by a completed passive, “those who were sown.” Gill, reading the same asymmetry, says such hearers are made good men by the grace of God; Henry prays for new-creating grace. We judge that reading consistent with Mark, and we note honestly that Mark 4:13 to 4:20 states it nowhere explicitly.
⚙ One consequence we would press on ourselves before pressing it on any reader: everything this unit disqualifies is something a religious life can display. Speed (4:15, 4:16, 4:17 all turn on εὐθύς), gladness, endurance for a season, even near-ripe growth. The only thing it cannot counterfeit is fruit borne while the hearing is still going on. The line that follows is our synthesis, not Scripture.
All four grounds heard the same word; only one of them was still hearing it at harvest.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
Jesus' explanation of the sower is recorded three times, and the Verifier's strongest candidates for this unit are all synoptic: Matthew 13:22 scores highest on shared lexemes, with Matthew 13:20, 13:21, 13:23 and Luke 8:14, 8:15 close behind. The shared vocabulary is exactly the parable's own: σπείρω (G4687), λόγος (G3056), ἀκούω (G191), ἄκανθα (G173). The differences are as instructive as the agreement. Ellicott notes that the second question of 4:13 is Mark's alone; Cambridge and JFB both reach to Luke for “lacks moisture” (Luke 8:6) and for the honest and good heart that bears fruit with patience (Luke 8:15); Cambridge observes that Luke expands Mark's one word for cares into cares, riches and pleasures (Luke 8:14). Barnes and Poole simply refer the reader across, Barnes to Matthew 13:18-23 and Poole to his own note on Mark 4:3.
Matthew 13:18-23 · Luke 8:11-15
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes across Mark 4:13-20 and Matthew 13:20-23 / Luke 8:14-15, including G4687 σπείρω (in 42 vv), G173 ἄκανθα (in 11 vv), G3056 λόγος (in 318 vv), G191 ἀκούω (in 398 vv). Greek to Greek, all refs in the New Testament: these are three records of one discourse, not one text citing another.
The adjective Mark uses of the rocky ground in 4:17, πρόσκαιροί (G4340), stands in only four verses of the Greek canon, and the Verifier surfaces two of the others. At Hebrews 11:25 Moses chooses ill treatment with the people of God over the πρόσκαιρον enjoyment of sin; at 2 Corinthians 4:18 the things seen are πρόσκαιρα while the things unseen are eternal. Read together, the word is not mainly about how long these hearers last but about which order they belong to. That is also why Mark 4:19 matters to 4:17: the anxieties there are “of the age” (τοῦ αἰῶνος, which Pulpit insists on translating literally), so the shallow hearer and the crowded hearer fail by the same clock.
2 Corinthians 4:18 · Hebrews 11:25
basis: Verifier: shared rare Greek lexeme G4340 πρόσκαιρος (in 4 vv), Greek to Greek, all refs in the New Testament. A rare-lexeme verbal link, not a quotation: neither epistle cites Mark.
συμπνίγουσιν (G4846, 4:19) is a rare compound, five verses in all, and its use is almost confined to this parable: Mark 4:7 in the telling, Mark 4:19 in the explaining, the synoptic parallels at Matthew 13:22 and Luke 8:14, and then Luke 8:42, where the crowds press so closely on Jesus on the way to Jairus' house that the same verb is used of the throng. The overlap is verbal and, we think, worth noticing without overreading: nothing in Luke 8:42 is about the word of God. What the shared vocabulary does establish is the kind of violence the verb names. It is not a refutation or a rejection of the word but a pressing in from all sides until there is no air, which is precisely how JFB describes the result, a religion reduced to the dregs of attention, interest and time.
Mark 4:7 · Luke 8:42
basis: Verifier: shared rare Greek lexeme G4846 συμπνίγω (in 5 vv), Mark 4:7 at 0.30 and Luke 8:42 at 0.20. Greek to Greek, all refs in the New Testament. Verbal only: the Luke 8:42 parallel is vocabulary, and we make no thematic claim there.
The noun for cares in 4:19, μέριμναι (G3308), is rare, six verses, and the Verifier pairs Mark 4:19 with Luke 21:34, where hearts are weighed down with dissipation, drunkenness and the μέριμναι of life so that that day comes on them suddenly. The mechanism is the same in both places and it is a mechanism of attention, not of doctrine. Cambridge's gloss on the original sense, distracting anxieties that cut a man in sunder, describes what makes such a hearer fruitless here and unready there.
Luke 21:34 · Luke 8:14
basis: Verifier: shared rare Greek lexeme G3308 μέριμνα (in 6 vv) at Luke 21:34 (0.17), with G1438 ἑαυτοῦ and G1565 ἐκεῖνος also shared; Luke 8:14 shares G191 ἀκούω and G173 ἄκανθα (in 11 vv). Greek to Greek, New Testament only.
⚙ The single defect of the second soil is named in one word, ῥίζαν (G4491, 4:17), and the Old Testament had already made that word the whole of a doctrine. Jeremiah 17:5-8 sets the man who trusts in man as a shrub in the desert, in a salt land not inhabited, against the man who trusts the LORD as a tree planted by water, whose roots reach the stream, which does not fear when heat comes and does not cease to bear fruit; Psalm 1:3 says the same of the man whose delight is the law of the LORD. Mark 4:17's heat is θλῖψις and διωγμός, and Cambridge's note on pressure and the threshing roller fits the figure. We claim only a shared pattern here, not a citation: Jesus does not quote Jeremiah, and no shared word can be demonstrated across the languages.
Jeremiah 17:5-8 · Psalm 1:3
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's numbers are impossible and no verbal tier is available. Basis is a shared figure: root or rootlessness deciding whether a plant survives heat and bears fruit. No quotation is claimed.
⚙ Thorns are not neutral vegetation in the Hebrew Scriptures. They are the ground's sentence in Genesis 3:18, and in Jeremiah 4:3 Judah is told to break up the fallow ground and not sow among thorns, while Hosea 10:12 pairs breaking up fallow ground with sowing righteousness and reaping mercy. Mark 4:18 sends the seed εἰς τὰς ἀκάνθας, into the thorns, and Pulpit's observation stands: this ground presents fewer obstacles than the rock, which is why it is the most dangerous of the three. Gill's description of hearers immoderately careful about the things of this life is the moral equivalent of unbroken ground. Again this is a pattern link only; Jesus quotes neither prophet, and the Greek ἄκανθα cannot be traced to a Hebrew lexeme by Strong's number.
Jeremiah 4:3 · Hosea 10:12 · Genesis 3:18
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew): no shared Strong's lexemes are possible, so the tier cannot be verbal. Basis is the shared prophetic figure of sowing into thorny or unbroken ground. G173 ἄκανθα is rare in the Greek canon (in 11 vv) but that frequency supports only the Greek to Greek links above.
⚙ ἡ ἀπάτη τοῦ πλούτου (4:19) has an Old Testament hinterland that the commentators reach for instinctively. Psalm 49:6 describes those who trust in their wealth and boast in the abundance of their riches, and then buries them; Proverbs 11:28 says he who trusts in his riches will fall, while the righteous flourish like foliage, which is the parable's own vegetable figure. Ezekiel 33:31 is the closest structural match to this soil in particular: a people who come and sit and hear the prophet's words and do not do them, because their heart goes after their gain. That is hearing plus barrenness, the exact combination Mark 4:18-19 describes. Pulpit's note that riches pierce like thorns, with 1 Timothy 6:10, extends the same indictment into the New Testament. Tiered as a pattern, not a quotation.
Psalm 49:6 · Proverbs 11:28 · Ezekiel 33:31
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so no shared Strong's lexeme can be recorded and the tier cannot be verbal. Basis is a shared pattern: hearing or professing while the heart follows gain, ending in barrenness or fall.
⚙ Isaiah 55:10-11 already used this parable's physics: rain and snow come down and do not return without watering the earth, making it bring forth and sprout and give seed to the sower and bread to the eater, and so God's word does not return to him empty but accomplishes what he purposed. Mark 4:14 puts the seed as τὸν λόγον and Mark 4:20 ends with a yield of thirty, sixty and a hundred. Held together, the two passages say something neither says alone: Isaiah guarantees the word's success without accounting for soils, and Mark accounts for soils without denying the harvest. We read the figural correspondence as genuine and old, and we flag that Jesus does not cite Isaiah here and that the word-as-seed and rain-as-word figures are not identical.
Isaiah 55:10-11
basis: Cross-Testament figural reading (Greek to Hebrew), so no shared Strong's basis exists and no verbal tier is available. Widely held as a figural correspondence in Christian reading; we mark it typological rather than verbal because Mark 4:13-20 contains no formal quotation of Isaiah.
The verb of the good soil, καρποφοροῦσιν (G2592, 4:20), returns a few verses later at Mark 4:28, where the earth brings forth fruit of itself, the man not knowing how, blade then head then full grain; the Verifier records the shared lexeme along with εἶτα (G1534) and γῆ (G1093). This is the nearest Mark comes to answering the question our sola reading leaves open. The sower's explanation grades the grounds and never says how a ground becomes good; the next parable says the growth is hidden from the sower himself.
Mark 4:28
basis: Verifier: Mark 4:28 (0.20) shares G2592 καρποφορέω (in 8 vv), G1534 εἶτα (in 14 vv) and G1093 γῆ (in 223 vv). Greek to Greek within one chapter of Mark; a verbal link by rare shared lexeme, not a quotation.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ Mark 4:14 declines to say who the sower is: Ὁ σπείρων is a participle, “the sowing one,” and the identification is left to the rest of the canon. The commentators fill it in with one voice but by different routes. JFB reasons that since the seed is the word of God, everyone who scatters that seed is a sower, and notes that where Matthew 13:37 does name the sower it is the Son of Man, with the devil as the sower of tares, those being the great unseen parties whose agents among men are the preachers. Cambridge applies the participle first to Christ, who “came forth from the Father and was come into the world” (John 16:28), then to his Apostles, then to all who go in his name, and adds 1 Peter 1:23 and 1 John 3:9 on the seed of the new birth. Gill takes the seed itself Christward: the word is the word of life and truth, of peace and reconciliation, of faith and righteousness, of salvation, all of it to be found in and by Jesus Christ. Pulpit adds Matthew's title, the word of the kingdom, which in Mark's Gospel has a single herald. On this reading the parable is Jesus describing the reception of his own preaching, and Mark 4:13 to 4:20 is therefore his own account of what is happening while he speaks.
Matthew 13:37 · John 16:28 · 1 Peter 1:23
⚙ The parable grades four soils and never explains how one of them came to be good. That silence is the place where the commentators, without exception here, reach for grace. Gill says the good ground stands for those made good men by the grace of God, since there is none good naturally and none that does good, no not one. On the rocky soil he says the stony hearts are not taken away and hearts of flesh are not given, which is Ezekiel 36:26 read as the missing act. Henry closes his note on the whole block with a petition, that by God's new-creating grace our hearts may become good ground and the good seed of the word produce in our lives good words and works through Jesus Christ. The grammar of 4:20 is at least consistent with this: the fruitful are introduced by an aorist passive participle, σπαρέντες, something done to them and completed, before any active verb of theirs appears. We state plainly that the inference is ours and theirs, and that this unit does not spell it out.
Ezekiel 36:26 · Mark 4:20 · 2 Corinthians 5:17
⚙ A reading we mark as ours and as going beyond what this unit says. Every liability the parable names fell on Jesus in Mark's own narrative and did not produce the parable's failures. Σατανᾶς came (Mark 1:13, and the accusation of 3:23 that Cambridge sends us back to) and lifted nothing away. θλῖψις and διωγμός came because of the word, and the verb Mark uses of others being tripped, σκανδαλίζω, is used of those offended at him (6:3) and of the disciples scattered at his arrest (14:27), never of him. Thorns came literally, pressed on his head (Mark 15:17), the ground's own curse from Genesis 3:18. And John 12:24 has him say that unless the grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies it remains alone, but if it dies it bears much fruit, which is the language of 4:20's καρποφοροῦσιν transposed to his own body. The grain-of-wheat reading of Christ's death is ancient; the specific move of reading Mark's four soils back onto Christ as the one rooted hearer is ours, and we offer it as a synthesis to be tested, not as the plain sense of the paragraph.
John 12:24 · Mark 14:27 · Mark 15:17
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text. BSB (CC0) with the Berean interlinear and Strong's numbers; parses and glosses in the notes above are taken from that interlinear and not re-derived. Two artifacts of the source data should be stated plainly rather than quietly smoothed. At Mark 4:20 the interlinear lists the article τὴν twice in succession (word indices 6 and 7) before καλὴν γῆν; we treat that as a duplication in the data, not as a feature of the Greek, and we have written no note on index 7. At Mark 4:13 index 3 and Mark 4:17 index 17 the gloss field reads “vvv,” a placeholder where the English of the negative Οὐκ and of the adverb εὐθύς has been folded into a neighbouring word; we glossed both from the parse and the lexicon instead.
Variants. Ellicott records that at 4:15 the better manuscripts read simply “in them” (εἰς αὐτούς) rather than “in their hearts,” the longer reading being an assimilation to Matthew 13:19; our literal rendering follows the shorter text, which is also what the interlinear carries. Pulpit records at 4:18 that the best authorities read καὶ ἄλλοι, “and others,” rather than “these,” and our divergence note depends on that reading.
Sources. Coverage in this unit is uneven and the reader should know it. Matthew Henry's concise note is a single block on Mark 4:1-20 and is reprinted identically under every verse, so the three excerpts quoted from him are pointed lines lifted from one continuous paragraph, not three separate comments. Joseph Benson's note likewise covers 4:13-20 as a block filed under 4:13. Albert Barnes writes substantively only on 4:13 and refers the reader to Matthew 13:18-23 for the rest; Matthew Poole refers throughout to his own note on Mark 4:3, so neither is quoted beyond 4:13. The Geneva notes in our text are, with one exception, the verse printed without comment; the exception is the marginal gloss (f) at 4:19, which is what we quote. Our transcriptions of the Pulpit Commentary at 4:18 (“condition of soft”) and of the Cambridge Bible at 4:17 (“thids image”) contain obvious misprints, which we have quoted as printed and flagged in the editorial notes rather than emended.
What is uncertain. The genitive in ἡ ἀπάτη τοῦ πλούτου (4:19) is genuinely open between “the deceit that riches practise” and “the deceit that riches are,” and we have not decided it. The force of ὁμοίως at 4:16 is disputed: Pulpit takes it of the mode of interpretation, most English versions take it of the likeness between hearers and seed, and both are possible. Cross-Testament threads in this unit (Isaiah 55, Jeremiah 4 and 17, Hosea 10, Psalm 49, Proverbs 11, Ezekiel 33 and 36, Genesis 3) rest on shared figures only: there is no formal quotation of the Old Testament anywhere in Mark 4:13-20, no shared Strong's lexeme is possible across the languages, and every such thread here is tiered structural or typological for that reason. The reading in our third Christ entry, which maps the four soils onto Christ himself, is our own synthesis and is marked novel.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)