Then He asked, “To what can we compare the kingdom of God? With what parable shall we present it?
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai elegen Pōs homoiōsōmen tēn basileian tou Theou ē en tini parabolē thōmen autēn
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Parable of the Mustard Seed
Mark 4:30–34 — The Parable of the Mustard Seed. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
Then He asked, “To what can we compare the kingdom of God? With what parable shall we present it?
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai elegen Pōs homoiōsōmen tēn basileian tou Theou ē en tini parabolē thōmen autēn
It is like a mustard seed, which is the smallest of all seeds sown upon the earth.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
hōs kokkō sinapeōs hos hotan on mikroteron pantōn tōn spermatōn sparē epi tēs gēs tōn epi tēs gēs
But after it is planted, it grows to be the largest of all garden plants and puts forth great branches, so that the birds of the air nest in its shade.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai hotan sparē anabainei kai ginetai meizon pantōn tōn lachanōn kai poiei megalous kladous hōste ta peteina tou ouranou dynasthai kataskēnoun hypo autou tēn skian
With many such parables Jesus spoke the word to them, to the extent that they could understand.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai toiautais pollais parabolais elalei ton logon autois kathōs ēdynanto akouein
He did not tell them anything without using a parable. But privately He explained everything to His own disciples.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de ouk elalei autois chōris parabolēs de kat’ idian epelyen panta tois idiois mathētais
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
Mark opens with an imperfect, ἔλεγεν, and a first person plural subjunctive, ὁμοιώσωμεν: how are we to liken the reign of God. Gill notes that the Jewish teachers regularly opened an illustration with exactly such a question, and Cambridge says the same, sending the reader to the parallel at Luke 13:18. Ellicott hears its purpose in the effect: the question puts the minds of the hearers on the stretch so that they may welcome the answer. Pulpit goes further and reads the plural as enlistment, our Lord making his hearers associates in the search for a fitting similitude, and he adds the textual point that the best authorities read πῶς, how, where the older English had the dative. Barnes draws the practical moral, that Jesus sought the plainest and most striking illustration, and turns it into a rule for preachers. ⚙ The grammar and the sources agree on one thing: before the parable is given, the hearer has already been made a participant in the act of comparison.
The comparison is a bare dative with no verb: as to a grain of mustard. Then the sentence loses its footing, ὃς masculine giving way to neuter ὂν μικρότερον, and the phrase “upon the earth” is used twice. Cambridge supplies the decisive fact: “small as a grain of mustard seed” was a Jewish proverb for something exceedingly minute, and the seed is least not of all seeds in the world but of all the husbandman sowed. Pulpit says the same without euphemism, that it is not literally and absolutely true that the mustard seed is less than all seeds, and that the expression is allowable when the smallness of the seed is set against the greatness of what it produces. Gill fills the comparative with history: a preacher in camel's hair, a master with no form nor comeliness, fishermen and illiterate persons, a hundred and twenty disciples at Jerusalem, and grace in the heart so small it can scarcely be discerned by the one who has it. ⚙ Both the lexicon (μικρός covers smallness of dignity as well as size) and the commentators push the same way: this is a claim about contemptibility, not about botany.
Two verbs carry the growth, ἀναβαίνει, it goes up, and γίνεται, it becomes, and the comparative μεῖζον answers v. 31's μικρότερον word for word. Cambridge holds the greatness to its proper scale, the greatest of the garden herbs (λαχάνων, a rare noun for kitchen vegetables), and reports from Thomson that in Judaea the plant reaches the height of a horse and rider; he also observes that the mustard seed is a favourite food of birds, and for the language of the fowls he points to Ezekiel 17:23. Ellicott lists what belongs to Mark alone: the great branches, and the birds lodging under the shadow rather than in the boughs. Gill takes the fowls for saints who come, lodge, abide and continue under the shadow of the Gospel; Poole reads the whole parable prophetically, of the success the Gospel would have after the resurrection, restrained at that moment to a little corner of the world. ⚙ The verb decides more than the identification does: κατασκηνοῦν is to camp down, to pitch a tent, so what the grown plant offers is dwelling, and it offers it to creatures that had no part in the sowing.
Mark states his summary twice, positively with ἐλάλει and negatively with οὐκ ἐλάλει, and both verbs are imperfect: this was the practice. Ellicott notes that “as they were able to hear it” is Mark's own addition, where Matthew instead cites Psalm 78:2. Benson turns the clause into a rule never to be forgotten by those who instruct others, and Poole agrees that Christ disdained not to accommodate his style to his hearers' capacity, adding that other preachers do but trifle with the greatest work under heaven and please themselves with their own noises. Gill allows that reading and then prefers a harder one: that he spoke in parables as they were able to hear without understanding, on purpose that they might not understand. The two readings cannot both be Mark's, and the Greek verb ἀκούειν is only “to hear,” so BSB's “understand” is already a choice between them. Then v. 34 adds the rare ἐπέλυεν, he was untying: Pulpit observes it occurs nowhere else in the Gospels, Ellicott connects it with the noun at 2 Peter 1:20, and Geneva gives the sense best, loosed, explained to them the hard riddles. ⚙ Whatever the veil was for, Mark reports that in private it was taken wholly off: πάντα, all things.
⚙ Fallible reading, offered to be tested. This little parable is put where it is to answer a question the chapter has already raised: if the word is so easily stolen, scorched and choked, what becomes of the kingdom? The answer is not that the losses were exaggerated but that the kingdom's greatness is not measured at the stage where it can be despised. Mark's two comparatives are the argument: smaller than all and greater than all, with nothing in between but sowing and time. And the greatness, when it comes, is not reckoned in height but in hospitality. The plant's whole achievement is branches and shade, and the beneficiaries are birds, who neither sowed nor tended, who arrive from the open sky and camp down (κατασκηνοῦν) in a shelter they did not make. That is the shape of the reign of God in the world: begun in something contemptible, grown into something that houses strangers. Two things restrain this reading. First, the smallness is proverbial, not botanical, and Pulpit and Cambridge are right to say so; nothing here licenses claims about seeds. Second, vv. 33 and 34 keep the parable from becoming self-explanatory: the crowd got the picture and not the meaning, and the meaning came only in private, by a rare verb that means untying a knot. So the parable is itself an instance of what it describes, a small thing that needs the Teacher's own hand before it opens. The following line is our own synthesis, offered as a summary and not as Scripture.
The kingdom is not hidden because it is small; it is small because it is a seed, and a seed is how God buries a kingdom in the ground.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The parable stands also at Matthew 13:31-32 and Luke 13:19, and the Verifier's computed bases show why the link is more than thematic: the fixed phrase κόκκος σινάπεως is shared, and both nouns are rare (σίναπι in five verses, κόκκος in seven). Matthew 13:32 further shares G3398 μικρός and G4690 σπέρμα, and Matthew 13:31 shares G932 βασιλεία, G3850 παραβολή and σίναπι. The differences are where the commentators earn their keep: Cambridge notes that Matthew has the man sow in his field and Luke in his garden, while Mark leaves the sowing impersonal; Ellicott lists Mark's two peculiarities, the great branches and the birds under the shadow. Barnes, Poole and JFB all refer their exposition of the parable to Matthew 13:31-32 rather than treating it here.
Matthew 13:31 · Matthew 13:32 · Luke 13:19
basis: Verifier: shared rare Greek lexemes G4615 σίναπι (in 5 vv) and G2848 κόκκος (in 7 vv), plus G3398 μικρός (43 vv), G4690 σπέρμα (40 vv) at Matthew 13:32 and G932 βασιλεία, G3850 παραβολή at Matthew 13:31. Greek to Greek synoptic parallel, so the verbal tier is available; no claim that one evangelist quotes another
Outside this parable the mustard grain appears in the New Testament only as a measure of faith: Matthew 17:20 and Luke 17:6 use the identical rare pair κόκκος σινάπεως. The image is constant and its application is not: here the least quantity is the kingdom in its beginnings, there it is the faith that moves a mountain or a tree. ⚙ Our reading of the overlap is modest, that Jesus used one proverbial figure of the least measurable quantity (Cambridge documents the proverb) for more than one purpose, so the two sayings interpret each other only at the level of that figure.
Matthew 17:20 · Luke 17:6
basis: Verifier: shared rare Greek lexemes G4615 σίναπι (in 5 vv) and G2848 κόκκος (in 7 vv) in a fixed two-word phrase; all references are Greek New Testament, so the verbal tier applies to the shared wording only, not to a shared meaning
A small shoot set in the ground by God, becoming great, putting out boughs, and birds of heaven nesting in them, is the picture of Ezekiel 17:22-24, where the LORD takes a sprig and plants it on the mountain height. Daniel 4:10-12 and 4:20-21 give the same picture of a great tree whose branches shelter the birds, there of a Gentile king's dominion and there for judgment. Cambridge draws precisely this background, observing that the growth of a worldly kingdom had already been set forth under the image of a tree and that the kingdom of God had been similarly compared, and citing Daniel 4:10-12, Ezekiel 17:22, 17:24 and Ezekiel 31:3-9. ⚙ We read Mark's mustard plant as answering both: it is planted by God as in Ezekiel, and it is emphatically not the world-tree of Daniel, since Mark keeps the comparison inside the kitchen garden (λαχάνων). Where the Old Testament tree is imperial, Mark's is a herb.
Ezekiel 17:22-24 · Daniel 4:10-12 · Daniel 4:20-21
basis: Figural, not verbal: a Greek text and Hebrew texts cannot share Strong's numbers, so no lexeme basis exists or is claimed. The pairing is a reading of the image (small planting, great boughs, birds sheltering) and is ancient and widely held, being named at these very verses by Cambridge
The clause about the birds is the most conventional thing in the parable. Cambridge points to Ezekiel 17:23 for the language; Ezekiel 31:6 has the birds of heaven making their nests in a great tree's boughs, and Psalm 104:12 has them dwelling by the streams among the branches. ⚙ Mark's own contribution, as Ellicott notes, is to move the birds from the branches to the shade beneath them, and his verb κατασκηνοῦν (G2681, four verses) means to camp down rather than to perch. We claim only a shared motif here, and we have not checked the Greek of the Septuagint at these Old Testament verses, so we make no claim about shared wording in translation.
Ezekiel 31:6 · Psalm 104:12
basis: Shared motif (birds of heaven sheltering in or under the boughs of a great plant) with no quotation claimed. Cross-Testament, Greek to Hebrew, so shared Strong's numbers are impossible by definition and none is offered; Cambridge records the Ezekiel background at this verse
The rare noun κόκκος ties this parable to two passages where a single grain must go into the ground before it is anything: John 12:24, the grain of wheat that abides alone unless it falls and dies, and 1 Corinthians 15:37, where what is sown is a bare grain and what rises is not the body sown. The Verifier records κόκκος in only seven verses, and John 12:24 also shares G1093 γῆ while 1 Corinthians 15:37 shares G4687 σπείρω. ⚙ We deliberately do not call this verbal: these are independent uses of one agricultural noun, not a quotation, and the connection we are drawing is the pattern (burial first, magnitude after), which is a reading and not a datum.
John 12:24 · 1 Corinthians 15:37
basis: Verifier: shared rare Greek lexeme G2848 κόκκος (in 7 vv), with G1093 γῆ at John 12:24 and G4687 σπείρω (42 vv) at 1 Corinthians 15:37. Downgraded from verbal on purpose: the shared word is a common noun in independent sayings, and no quotation is claimed
Mark's verb for the private explaining, ἐπέλυεν (G1956), is one of the rarest words in the unit: the Verifier finds it in two verses of the New Testament, here and Acts 19:39, where a matter is to be settled in the lawful assembly. Pulpit states that it occurs nowhere else in the Gospels and connects it with the noun at 2 Peter 1:20, and Ellicott makes the same connection, both then using the coincidence as auxiliary evidence about the genuineness of that Epistle. ⚙ Two cautions. The Acts 19:39 link is a Verifier-computed lexeme match and is solid. The 2 Peter 1:20 link is to a cognate noun that the Verifier did not return as a shared lexeme, and the authorship inference built on it is contested ground in the history of interpretation, so we flag the pairing rather than record it as confirmed.
Acts 19:39 · 2 Peter 1:20
basis: Verifier confirms G1956 ἐπιλύω shared with Acts 19:39 (in 2 vv), a genuinely rare lexeme. The 2 Peter 1:20 half rests on a cognate noun not returned by the Verifier and is asserted by Ellicott and Pulpit in service of a disputed argument about that Epistle's authorship; provenance of that inference should be verified before the link is relied on
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ The parable's first term is contemptibility, and μικρός in the lexicon covers smallness of dignity as well as of size. Gill spells the smallness out in persons rather than in botany: a forerunner in camel's hair and a leathern girdle, a Lord who made no pompous appearance, in whom there was no form nor comeliness, a man of sorrows and acquainted with griefs, of mean descent and occupation, with fishermen for disciples, and at his death a hundred and twenty in Jerusalem. That is the language of Isaiah 53:2-3 applied to the seed. Poole reads the parable prophetically, as foretelling the success the Gospel would have after Christ's resurrection from the dead, which at that moment was restrained to a little corner of the world and met with small acceptance. ⚙ Read together, the parable does not merely predict growth; it makes the shape of the kingdom match the shape of its King, who is first buried and then great. This is the widely-held reading and it is Poole's and Gill's here.
Isaiah 53:2-3 · John 12:24
⚙ Ezekiel 17:22-24 has the LORD himself take a tender sprig from the cedar's top and plant it on a high mountain, where it bears boughs and every bird dwells beneath it, and the nations learn who brought the high tree low and made the low tree high. Cambridge names that passage, with Daniel 4:10-12 and Ezekiel 31:3-9, as the background to this parable's image. The figural reading of Ezekiel's sprig as the Messiah is ancient and widely held. What Mark adds is the shelter: not birds in the branches, as Matthew has it, but birds under the shadow (Ellicott notes the variation), and the verb is to camp down, not to perch. ⚙ Our own reading, which is more specific than any commentator quoted here and should be weighed as such, is that Mark's small detail is where the Gentiles enter the parable: creatures of the open sky, with no part in the sowing, lodging in the shade of a planting God made small on purpose.
Ezekiel 17:22-24 · Ezekiel 31:6
⚙ The unit ends not with the parable but with the Teacher who unties it: ἐπέλυεν, imperfect, his habit with his own. Geneva keeps the metaphor exactly, loosed, explained to them the hard riddles, and Pulpit notes the verb occurs nowhere else in the Gospels. Barnes says the private explaining showed them more at length the spiritual meaning; Gill says it led them into a large knowledge of himself. ⚙ We read this as christological in structure and not only in content: the parables are not a code that a sufficiently clever hearer breaks, and Mark's own summary insists that the untying happened in his presence, with his own, in private. The risen Lord opening the Scriptures and the understanding of his disciples at Luke 24:27 and 24:45 is the same action after the resurrection that Mark records before it. That the private exposition was necessary and gracious is widely held; the tighter claim that the verb makes Christ himself the hermeneutic is our own emphasis.
Luke 24:27 · Luke 24:45 · 2 Peter 1:20
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
⚙ Honesty notes for this unit. (1) Thin Markan commentary. Barnes at vv. 31 and 32, Poole at vv. 31 and 32, and JFB throughout refer the reader to their exposition at Matthew 13:31-32 rather than commenting here; the JFB block supplied at vv. 30, 31, 32 and 34 actually opens on Mark 4:29 (the harvest and the sickle) and is a cross-reference, so it has not been quoted as though it expounded the mustard seed. Matthew Henry's entry is a single Concise note on Mark 4:21-34 and speaks to the growth parables together; it is quoted as such. Geneva's entries at vv. 30, 31 and 32 are only the text of the verse, with no gloss, so Geneva is quoted only where he actually glosses (vv. 33 and 34).
(2) Text. Pulpit reports that in v. 30 the best authorities read πῶς for τίνι in the first clause and τίνι αὐτὴν παραβολῇ θῶμεν in the second; the Berean interlinear used here carries that reading, and the older English wording quoted by some of the commentators reflects the other. In v. 31 the interlinear records “upon the earth” twice (indices 11 to 13 and 14 to 17), which is a real redundancy in the Greek line and not an error introduced in this edition; readers comparing printed texts will find the phrase distributed differently.
(3) Translation choices we have flagged rather than settled. BSB renders ἀκούειν (v. 33) as “understand,” which is an interpretation of a verb that means “to hear”; the two main lines of exposition here (accommodation, in Poole, Benson, Barnes and Geneva; deliberate veiling, preferred by Gill) turn on that very word, and we have not adjudicated between them. BSB also supplies “Jesus” in v. 33 and “anything” in v. 34, where the Greek has neither.
(4) What we do not claim. The smallness of the mustard seed is proverbial, and both Cambridge and Pulpit say plainly that it is not literally the least of all seeds; nothing in this unit should be read as a claim in natural history. Cambridge's report of the plant's size rests on Thomson's nineteenth century travel observation, which he names, and Pulpit's report of a mustard tree in Chile large enough to ride under is a traveller's account at second hand; both are evidence about later observation, not about first century Galilee. We have not consulted the Septuagint, so no claim is made about shared Greek wording between this passage and Ezekiel 17, Ezekiel 31, Daniel 4 or Psalm 104; every Old Testament link in this unit is tiered typological or structural for that reason, as no Greek to Hebrew pair can share a Strong's number. The identification of the birds with saints (Gill) or with the Gentiles (our own suggestion) is interpretation; the text says only that birds are able to lodge there.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)