On the other side of the sea, they arrived in the region of the Gerasenes.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai eis to peran tēs thalassēs ēlthon eis tēn chōran tōn Gerasēnōn
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Demons and the Pigs
Mark 5:1–20 — The Demons and the Pigs. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
On the other side of the sea, they arrived in the region of the Gerasenes.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai eis to peran tēs thalassēs ēlthon eis tēn chōran tōn Gerasēnōn
As soon as Jesus got out of the boat, He was met by a man with an unclean spirit, who was coming from the tombs.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai euthys autou exelthontos ek tou ploiou hypēntēsen autō anthrōpos en akathartō pneumati ek tōn mnēmeiōn
This man had been living in the tombs and could no longer be restrained, even with chains.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
hos eichen tēn katoikēsin en tois mnēmasin kai edynato ouketi oudeis dēsai auton oude halysei
Though he was often bound with chains and shackles, he had broken the chains and shattered the shackles. Now there was no one with the strength to subdue him.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
dia auton pollakis to dedesthai halysesin kai pedais kai diespasthai hyp’ autou tas halyseis kai syntetriphthai tas pedas kai oudeis ischyen damasai auton
Night and day in the tombs and in the mountains he kept crying out and cutting himself with stones.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai pantos nyktos kai hēmeras en tois mnēmasin kai en tois oresin ēn dia krazōn kai katakoptōn heauton lithois
When the man saw Jesus from a distance, he ran and fell on his knees before Him.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai idōn ton Iēsoun apo makrothen edramen kai prosekynēsen auton
And he shouted in a loud voice, “What do You want with me, Jesus, Son of the Most High God? I beg You before God not to torture me!”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai kraxas megalē phōnē legei Ti soi kai emoi Iēsou Huie tou tou Hypsistou Theou horkizō se ton Theon mē basanisēs me
For Jesus had already declared, “Come out of this man, you unclean spirit!”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
gar elegen autō Exelthe ek tou anthrōpou to akatharton to pneuma
“What is your name?” Jesus asked. “My name is Legion,” he replied, “for we are many.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Ti soi onoma Kai epērōta auton moi onoma Legiōn Kai legei autō hoti esmen polloi
And he begged Jesus repeatedly not to send them out of that region.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai parekalei auton polla hina mē aposteilē auta exō tēs chōras
There on the nearby hillside a large herd of pigs was feeding.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de ekei tō pros orei megalē agelē choirōn Ēn boskomenē
So the demons begged Jesus, “Send us to the pigs, so that we may enter them.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai parekalesan auton legontes Pempson hēmas eis tous choirous hina eiselthōmen eis autous
He gave them permission, and the unclean spirits came out and went into the pigs, and the herd of about two thousand rushed down the steep bank into the sea and drowned in the water.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai epetrepsen autois kai ta ta akatharta pneumata exelthonta eisēlthon eis tous choirous kai hē agelē hōs dischilioi hōrmēsen kata tou krēmnou eis tēn thalassan kai epnigonto en tē thalassē
Those tending the pigs ran off and reported this in the town and countryside, and the people went out to see what had happened.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai hoi boskontes autous ephygon kai apēngeilan eis tēn polin kai eis tous agrous kai ēlthon idein ti estin to gegonos
When they came to Jesus, they saw the man who had been possessed by the legion of demons sitting there, clothed and in his right mind; and they were afraid.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai erchontai pros ton Iēsoun kai theōrousin ton daimonizomenon ton eschēkota ton legiōna kathēmenon himatismenon kai sōphronounta kai ephobēthēsan
Those who had seen it described what had happened to the demon-possessed man and also to the pigs.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai hoi idontes diēgēsanto autois pōs egeneto tō daimonizomenō kai peri tōn choirōn
And the people began to beg Jesus to leave their region.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai ērxanto parakalein auton apelthein apo autōn tōn horiōn
As He was getting into the boat, the man who had been possessed by the demons begged to go with Him.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai autou embainontos eis to ploion ho daimonistheis parekalei auton hina ē met’ autou
But Jesus would not allow him. “Go home to your own people,” He said, “and tell them how much the Lord has done for you, and what mercy He has shown you.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai ouk aphēken auton Hypage eis ton oikon sou pros tous sous alla legei autō kai apangeilon autois hosa ho Kyrios pepoiēken soi kai ēleēsen se
So the man went away and began to proclaim throughout the Decapolis how much Jesus had done for him. And everyone was amazed.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai apēlthen kai ērxato kēryssein en tē Dekapolei hosa ho Iēsous epoiēsen autō kai pantes ethaumazon
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
Mark spends five verses on a portrait before he spends one on a cure. The crossing lands Jesus εἰς τὸ πέραν, on the far side, and Cambridge notes that not even there was the Lord destined to find peace or rest. Ellicott records the divided manuscripts behind the district's name (Gerasenes, Gergesenes, Gadarenes), and Gill, marshalling Pliny, Ptolemy and the Talmud, concludes from its situation and the manners of its people that it was a heathen country. The man's address is a κατοίκησις among the μνήμασιν, a settled residence in other people's memorials; Cambridge explains that such places were reckoned unclean because of the dead men's bones which were there. Maclaren, who calls the passage either painted from life or one of the most wonderful feats of the poetic imagination, reads the address as a disclosure: all that belongs to corruption and death is congenial to the subjects of that dark kingdom of evil. Then the three perfect infinitives of v4, δεδέσθαι, διεσπάσθαι, συντετρῖφθαι, each recording a finished result: bound, torn apart, crushed. Ellicott judges the material may have been cord rather than iron, since one set is snapped and the other worn away; Cambridge sends us to Acts 19:16 for comparable strength; Barnes quotes Thomson on furious and dangerous maniacs who sleep in tombs and caves, reading the case through the medicine of 1834. The last verb of the sequence is δαμάσαι, to tame, the word for breaking an animal, and JFB sums the district's verdict: he was the terror of the whole locality. Only Mark records the stones (Ellicott), and JFB alone among our voices insists on the inside of it: terrible as he was to others, he himself endured untold misery.
The structure of the middle movement is a contest of binding. The man who broke every ἅλυσις tries to put Jesus under oath: ὁρκίζω σε τὸν Θεόν, and Ellicott notes that the verb is the one behind our word exorcise, peculiar here to St. Mark, so that the demon seeks in some sense to exorcise, though in the language not of command but entreaty. Geneva reduces it to its legal content: assure me by an oath that you will not vex me. It does not hold. What holds is two words already spoken, Ἔξελθε (v8), which Ellicott's imperfect ἔλεγεν shows was still in progress when the shriek interrupted it. Ellicott also supplies the title's history: Ὑψίστου, Most High, is the name shared from Melchizedek onward between Gentile and Jew, and had become a formula of exorcism, which is why it was ready on this man's lips. Then the name that answers a name. Cambridge hears the political weight in it: he had seen the thick and serried ranks of a Roman legion, that fearful instrument of oppression; JFB reckons the number indefinite but large enough to rush into two thousand swine; Henry and Gill both use it to count the enemy. Four times in this narrative someone beseeches, as Maclaren observes, and here two of the four fall: not out of the region (v10), and into the swine (v12). JFB frankly labels his reconstruction of the demons' motive a guess ("Had they spoken out all their mind, perhaps this would have been it"), and Gill's reading, that they chose the swine as being impure creatures like themselves, is inference too. What the text gives is ἐπέτρεψεν, He turned it over to them, and then the herd's single verb ὥρμησεν, rushed, down τοῦ κρημνοῦ, the definite cliff that Pulpit and Cambridge both locate on the ground. Pulpit draws the balance: by this Christ shows of how little worth are earthly possessions when set against the souls of men. On whether the permission was just, JFB answers by the owners' guilt, Gill by the Lord's proprietorship of all creatures, and both are arguing, not reporting.
The last movement is built of verbs of report. The herdsmen ἀπήγγειλαν (v14), the eyewitnesses διηγήσαντο (v16), and at v19 Jesus commands the healed man ἀπάγγειλον, the very verb the swineherds used in their panic, now turned into a commission. Between them stands the picture in v15: καθήμενον, ἱματισμένον, σωφρονοῦντα, sitting, clothed, sound-minded. Barnes makes it the proof of the miracle, that to see him all at once peaceful, calm, and rational was proof that it was the power of God only that had done it; JFB points out that Mark never told us the man was naked, and that we owe the clothing's significance to Luke, calling this a striking case of Undesigned Coincidences; Ellicott notes the antithesis of past and present state is St. Mark's alone. The fear that follows is read differently by our voices: Barnes takes it as awe, as in the presence of God, while JFB hears other feelings of a darker kind, and Gill thinks they dreaded a judge and said not one word about their swine. Then the third and fourth requests. Cambridge quotes Trench on the town's: and their prayer was heard: He did depart; He took them at their word; and let them alone. Maclaren weighs the man's: two of the requests are granted, one is refused, and it is the one we might have expected to be granted. Benson gives the reason our sources agree on, that it was proper to leave him in that country as a witness of the power and goodness of his deliverer, and Cambridge calls him the first great preacher in the half-heathen district. Ellicott adds the honest textual note that the Κύριος of v19 must be taken in its Old Testament sense, of the Father, since Luke 8:39 has God. The man's obedience at v20 quietly overshoots the command: Gill observes that instead of saying the Lord had done them, he attributed them to Jesus.
⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested. Read the unit as a story about binding. Every party in it is trying to hold something. The district tries to hold the man with ἁλύσεσιν καὶ πέδαις and fails so often that it gives up (Ellicott). The man, or the legion in him, tries to hold Jesus with an oath, ὁρκίζω σε, the strongest binding a first-century tongue knew, invoking the highest name available (Ellicott shows it was the stock exorcistic formula), and fails in a single verse. The demons try to hold their ground, begging not to be sent out of the χώρα, and are given a tenancy that lasts perhaps a minute before the sea takes it. The townspeople try to hold their borders, and get exactly what they ask for: He goes. Only one binding in the whole unit holds, and it is a word: Ἔξελθε. Notice, then, what Jesus does with the one man who wants to be bound to Him. The healed man's request in v18, ἵνα ᾖ μετ’ αὐτοῦ, is in substance the clause Mark used at 3:14 for the calling of the Twelve, that they might be with Him. It is refused, and the refusal is not a lesser calling but the same calling given a harder field: ἀπάγγειλον, report, the swineherds' own word of terror repurposed as gospel, and then κηρύσσειν in v20, the verb Mark used of Jesus' own preaching in 1:14. The unit therefore ends with a man who is not with Jesus and is doing Jesus' work, in a district that asked Jesus to leave. If that is right, the consolation here is not proximity but commission, and the most searching sentence in the passage is not the demons' plea but the townspeople's: a request Jesus grants.
Every chain in this story breaks except the one made of a single word (this is the tool's own reading, not a verse).
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
Matthew 8:28-34 and Luke 8:26-39 tell the same event, and the Verifier's strongest computed links are to Matthew 8:32 and Luke 8:33, sharing ἐξέρχομαι (G1831) and, decisively, ἀγέλη (G34), a word the Verifier finds in only seven verses of the New Testament and which occurs in this unit at vv11 and 13. The entry printed at Mark 5:1 under the tag JFB, which also carries Poole's annotations, records the older observation plainly: this famous piece of history hath the testimony of three evangelists. The differences are real and our voices do not hide them. Ellicott and Cambridge both note that Mark and Luke report one demoniac where Matthew has two; JFB concedes it is difficult to see how the principal details here given could apply to more than one case; Gill and Benson suppose Mark records the fiercer of the two. JFB separately shows the dependence running the other way, that Mark's "clothed" in v15 is only intelligible because Luke 8:27 tells us the man wore none.
Matthew 8:32 · Luke 8:33 · Matthew 8:28
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G34 ἀγέλη (rare, in 7 vv) and G1831 ἐξέρχομαι (in 212 vv) with Matthew 8:32 and Luke 8:33, plus G5561 χώρα (in 28 vv) and G4008 πέραν (in 24 vv) with Matthew 8:28. Greek to Greek within the synoptic tradition; the rare lexeme ἀγέλη carries the verbal tier. No quotation is claimed, only shared wording in parallel accounts.
λεγιών (G3003) is a Latin loanword, and the Verifier finds it in just four verses of the New Testament. One of them is Matthew 26:53, where Jesus tells Peter in Gethsemane that He could ask the Father and be given more than twelve legions of angels. The two occurrences frame the same authority from opposite ends: here a legion is dispossessed by a word without any army, there an available army is declined. Cambridge supplies the political texture of the word, that he had seen the thick and serried ranks of a Roman legion, that fearful instrument of oppression; JFB and Gill assemble the varying numbers a legion held and both conclude the sense is an indefinitely large one. The Verifier's shared basis with Matthew 26:53 also includes παρακαλέω (G3870), the unit's fourfold "besought" that Maclaren uses to divide the narrative.
Matthew 26:53
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G3003 λεγεών (rare, in 4 vv), G3870 παρακαλέω (in 105 vv), G1410 δύναμαι (in 201 vv). Greek to Greek; the rarity of λεγεών carries the verbal tier. The link is lexical, not a quotation, and the thematic pairing of the two legions is the tool's own reading.
διασπάω (G1288), the verb for what this man did to his chains in v4, occurs in only two verses of the New Testament. The other is Acts 23:10, where the tribune snatches Paul out of the council lest he be torn in pieces. The usage is exactly inverted: in Acts a man is nearly torn apart by a crowd, in Mark a crowd's ironwork is torn apart by a man. Ellicott, weighing the two verbs of v4, suggests the bonds may have been cords rather than metal since one kind is snapped and the other worn away; Cambridge points to Acts 19:16 for a comparable display of strength, which is a second Lukan parallel to the same phenomenon.
Acts 23:10
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G1288 διασπάω (rare, in 2 vv, the only two New Testament occurrences), with G5259 ὑπό and G4183 πολύς. Greek to Greek. Acts 19:16 is added on Cambridge's own citation, not on a computed lexeme, and carries no verbal claim.
The Verifier links this unit to Luke 15:15 through two words: χώρα (G5561), the region of vv1 and 10, and βόσκω (G1006), the feeding of vv11 and 14, found in only nine verses. In the parable the younger son goes into a far χώρα and is sent into the fields to βόσκειν χοίρους; here a man in a far χώρα among χοίροι is restored, clothed, and sent home εἰς τὸν οἶκόν σου (v19). Gill's reading of v15 as an emblem of conversion, in which the man once naked is now clothed and once wandering now sits, runs along the same line, and Cambridge notes that the clothing is a detail we owe to Luke. We tier this thematic rather than verbal on purpose: the shared words are real, but the resonance between a parable and a miracle is a reading, not a citation, and nothing in the text says Mark or Luke intended it.
Luke 15:15
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G5561 χώρα (in 28 vv, twice) and G1006 βόσκω (in 9 vv). Greek to Greek, so a verbal basis exists, but the claim made here is a shared motif (far country, swine, clothing, return home) and is deliberately tiered down from verbal.
Isaiah 65:4 describes a rebellious people who sit among the graves and eat swine's flesh, and Isaiah 66:3 and 66:17 return to the same pairing of tombs and swine as the emblem of a defiled cult. That is the exact double uncleanness Mark assembles: a man whose κατοίκησις is in the μνήμασιν (v3) and a ἀγέλη χοίρων grazing on the same hillside (v11). Leviticus 11:7 and Deuteronomy 14:8 are the statutes that make the swine unclean in the first place, and Gill invokes Deuteronomy 14:8 directly when defending the herd's destruction, while Cambridge observes that if the owners were only in part Jews, who merely trafficked in these animals, still they were not justified before the Law. Cambridge also cites Numbers 19:11 and 19:16 for the uncleanness of contact with the dead. No formal quotation is made or implied; what we record is that Mark's scene is built out of the Torah's categories of uncleanness and Isaiah's picture of them.
Isaiah 65:4 · Leviticus 11:7 · Deuteronomy 14:8 · Numbers 19:16 · Isaiah 66:17
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek unit to Hebrew texts), so no shared Strong's number is possible and no verbal tier is available. The recorded basis is a shared motif and legal category: graves plus swine's flesh (Isaiah 65:4; 66:3, 17), swine declared unclean (Leviticus 11:7; Deuteronomy 14:8, cited by Gill at Mark 5:13), and corpse-uncleanness (Numbers 19:11, 16, cited by Cambridge at Mark 5:2).
Psalm 74:13-14 has God breaking the heads of the sea monsters in the waters, and Isaiah 27:1 has the Lord slaying the dragon that is in the sea. Mark has just shown Jesus rebuking that sea, and now the unclean host ends εἰς τὴν θάλασσαν, drowned in it. Read figurally, the geography preaches: the waters that could not resist His voice become the grave of what defied it. We mark this typological and, so far as our sources go, novel in this pairing. None of the eleven commentators in this brief makes the connection; Gill and Geneva instead debate which body of water was involved, Geneva quoting Strabo on a polluted pool at Gadara and Gill weighing the Talmudic whirlpool of Gadara against the lake of Tiberias. Pulpit stays with what the act demonstrates morally, that earthly possessions weigh little against the souls of men. The figural reading is ours and should be tested, not leaned on.
Psalm 74:13 · Isaiah 27:1
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew): no shared Strong's number is possible, so no verbal claim is made. The basis is a figural reading of a shared image, the sea as the place of the defeated monster (Psalm 74:13-14; Isaiah 27:1), against Mark's θάλασσα in vv1 and 13. Novel rather than widely-held: no commentator in this unit's sources draws it.
At v19 Jesus commands ἀπάγγειλον αὐτοῖς ὅσα ὁ Κύριός σοι πεποίηκεν, and the shape of that sentence is the shape of the Psalms of testimony. Psalm 66:16 calls the hearers to come and hear what God has done for the speaker's soul, and Psalm 107:22 sends the delivered, including those who went down to the sea, to declare His works with rejoicing. This is not our own pairing: Barnes, commenting on v20, points the reader to Psalm 66:16 by name. Ellicott adds the necessary caution on the word itself, that Κύριος here, with God as its equivalent in Luke 8:39, must be taken in its Old Testament sense, of the Father and not of the Lord Jesus, which makes the Psalm parallel tighter and the man's substitution at v20 (Gill: he attributed them to Jesus) the more striking.
Psalm 66:16 · Psalm 107:22
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew): no shared Strong's number is possible, so no verbal tier is available. The basis is a shared speech-form, the delivered man commanded to recount what God has done for him, and the provenance is explicit: Barnes cites Psalm 66:16 at Mark 5:20.
A widely repeated modern reading takes λεγιών as a deliberate political signal, the occupying army named in a Gentile district, with the herd's plunge into the sea as its figure. The raw material is in our sources: Cambridge writes of that fearful instrument of oppression, that sign of terror and fear to the conquered nations, and Pulpit notes that the Decapolis had been colonized by Rome some sixty years before Christ and that swine were bred there for provisioning the Roman army. But none of our eleven commentators draws the political conclusion; for JFB, Gill and Henry the word supplies only number and malice. We therefore flag the reading rather than assert it: the lexical fact is certain, the political intent is not attested in any source before us, and we cannot verify its provenance from this brief.
Mark 5:9
basis: Contested provenance. The lexical datum is firm (G3003 λεγεών, in 4 vv, a Latin military loanword) and Cambridge and Pulpit supply the Roman context, but no source in this unit's brief asserts an intended political reference. Flagged pending a citable source rather than tiered.
The healed man's petition at v18 is ἵνα ᾖ μετ’ αὐτοῦ, that he might be with Him. At Mark 3:14, appointing the Twelve, Mark writes ἵνα ὦσιν μετ’ αὐτοῦ, that they might be with Him: the same conjunction, the same verb of being, the same preposition, changed only from plural to singular. We checked the pair with the Verifier and report its result honestly: the shared lexemes are ἵνα (G2443) and μετά (G3326), both extremely common, so the link cannot rest on rare vocabulary and is tiered structural rather than verbal. What carries it is the identity of the clause. If the reading holds, the refusal in v19 is not a lesser place but the same appointment given a Gentile field, which is exactly how Benson, JFB, Cambridge and Pulpit all read the sending, and it is confirmed by Mark's own choice of κηρύσσειν at v20, the verb he uses of Jesus' preaching. The clause identity is the tool's observation, not a claim any commentator in this brief makes.
Mark 3:14
basis: Verifier pair check (Mark 5:18 / Mark 3:14) returns structural / thematic, basis: shared lexemes G2443 ἵνα (in 626 vv) and G3326 μετά (in 440 vv). Both are common, so no verbal tier is claimed; the recorded basis is the identical purpose clause ἵνα ᾖ / ὦσιν μετ’ αὐτοῦ within one Gospel.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ The unit's Christology is spoken by the wrong mouth and is nonetheless exact. Υἱὲ τοῦ Θεοῦ τοῦ Ὑψίστου: Ellicott traces this name from Melchizedek (Genesis 14:18) and Balaam (Numbers 24:16) through the Psalms and Daniel, the name held in common by Gentile and Jew, and notes that it had hardened into a formula of exorcism, which is why it lay ready on this man's tongue. Gill presses the confession: the devils own the being of a God and his supreme government, and confess Jesus of Nazareth to be the Son of God according to his divine nature, yet have nothing to do with him as a Saviour. Pulpit infers from the scene that after these miracles there was a general belief amongst the hosts of evil that he was indeed the Son of God, the Messiah. The demonstration is the manner of it: no name invoked, no adjuration, no chain, only Ἔξελθε. Maclaren titles the whole passage THE LORD OF DEMONS, and Henry draws the pastoral consequence, that in the Lord and in the power of his might we shall be able to stand against them, though there are legions of them. This is the ancient and widely-held reading, and our voices state it with one accord.
Mark 5:7 · Mark 5:8 · Genesis 14:18 · James 2:19
⚙ Mark's three participles in v15, καθήμενον, ἱματισμένον, σωφρονοῦντα, undo the portrait of vv3 to 5 item by item: the restless one sits, the naked one is clothed, the shrieking one is sound-minded. Barnes makes this the evidential centre of the miracle, that to see him all at once peaceful, calm, and rational was proof that it was the power of God only that had done it. Luke adds that he sat at the feet of Jesus, and Henry reads the posture as discipleship: when the vilest transgressor is delivered by the power of Jesus from the bondage of Satan, he will gladly sit at the feet of his Deliverer, and hear his word. Gill develops the same figure at length, the man once naked now clothed with a righteousness not his own. ⚙ Our own addition is only this: the clothing is supplied by someone, and JFB's guess that it came from among the Twelve is a guess, honestly labelled. What the text asserts is that the salvation shows itself as a man returned to his senses, his clothes, and his household (v19), which is what redemption looks like when it is finished rather than merely begun. The redemptive-historical reading is widely held; the detail about the garment's provenance is not a fact.
Mark 5:15 · Luke 8:35
⚙ The healed man's petition in v18, ἵνα ᾖ μετ’ αὐτοῦ, is in substance the clause Mark used at 3:14 when Jesus appointed the Twelve that they might be with Him. It is denied, and the denial is a sending. Maclaren, who organizes the whole narrative around its four requests, marks the strangeness: two of the requests are granted, one is refused, and the refused one is the one we might have expected to be granted. Benson gives the purpose our sources agree on, that it was proper to leave him in that country as a witness of the power and goodness of his deliverer; JFB judges it a far nobler calling than following Him where nobody had ever heard of him; Cambridge notes the reversal of Jesus' usual command to silence, that on this man He enjoined publicity, appointing him a living memorial of His own saving Power and the first great preacher in the half-heathen district; Pulpit says plainly that this dispossessed demoniac became a missionary to both Jew and Gentile. ⚙ The verbal detail is ours and should be weighed: at v19 the commission uses ἀπάγγειλον, the swineherds' own panicked verb from v14, and at v20 the man's activity is κηρύσσειν, the verb Mark uses of Jesus' own preaching. The man in the tombs becomes the first herald in the Decapolis. The substance of this reading is widely held among our voices; the lexical bridge from 3:14 and from v14 is the tool's contribution.
Mark 5:18 · Mark 5:19 · Mark 3:14 · Mark 5:20
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
⚙ Honesty notes for this unit. (1) The place name is genuinely uncertain. Our interlinear prints Γερασηνῶν while the Strong's entry behind it (G1086) is filed as Γεργεσηνός; Ellicott reports that the better MSS give Gerasenes and some Gergesenes, Gill's copies mostly read Gadarenes, Pulpit prefers Gerasenes, and Cambridge lays out all three candidate sites. We have not resolved this and the reader should not take the printed form as settled. (2) One demoniac or two: Mark and Luke have one, Matthew 8:28 has two. Ellicott, Cambridge, Gill, Benson and JFB all register the difficulty and answer it by conjecture (one was fiercer, or better known). We record the difficulty and adopt no harmonization. (3) The clothing of v15 is not explained by Mark. JFB's suggestion that the Twelve supplied it is expressly a conjecture, and Gill offers a second (garments left by the fleeing herdsmen). Neither is in the text. (4) Whether the swine's owners were Jews or Gentiles is disputed in our own sources: JFB says there can hardly be any doubt they were Jews, Gill argues the case either way, Cambridge allows part-Jewish traffickers, Pulpit points to Roman colonists and army provisioning. The justice of the permission in v13 is then argued on different grounds by JFB (the owners' guilt) and Gill (the Creator's right); both are theological argument, not reportage. (5) Cambridge's cross-references in this chapter are printed with several book names miscarried as "Mark" where Luke or Matthew is meant (for example "Mark 8:27" and "Mark 8:31" for Luke 8:27 and Luke 8:31, and "Mark 8:28" for Matthew 8:28). We have read these as the intended Lukan and Matthean references and flag the printing error rather than silently correcting the quotation. (6) Ellicott's note on Κύριος at v19, that it must be taken in its Old Testament sense of the Father since Luke 8:39 has God, is a judgement we follow but do not treat as certain; Gill reads the same verse as proof of Christ's deity, and Mark himself lets the man substitute Jesus for the Lord at v20 without comment. (7) Verse-by-verse Verifier candidates supplied all verbal thread bases; the Isaiah, Leviticus, Deuteronomy, Numbers and Psalm links are cross-Testament and therefore carry no shared Strong's number, so each is tiered structural or typological with the reason stated. The Psalm 66:16 link is on Barnes' own citation; the chaoskampf reading of the sea is the tool's and is marked novel; the political reading of "Legion" is flagged as unverified provenance. (8) Maclaren's and Gill's entries are capped in the brief; we have quoted only from the text before us and have not reconstructed the missing portions. (9) The long entry printed at Mark 5:1 under the tag JFB visibly contains a second commentator's annotations as well, since it includes a chapter outline and the direction "See Poole on Matthew 8:28". Where we draw on that material in prose we name the tag and the merge rather than guess at the author, and we have anchored no voice to it; Poole therefore appears nowhere in this unit's voice list, his own entries at vv2 to 20 being only cross-references to Mark 5:1. (10) The Mark 3:14 thread rests on a Verifier pair check we ran ourselves; its computed basis is two very common lexemes, and we say so in the badge rather than dress the clause identity up as a verbal link.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)