AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
Twelve years under Leviticus 15, and the contact that runs backwards structural / thematic: confirmed
⚙ Cambridge names the statute at v. 25 and again at v. 33, where it explains her trembling: under the law the touch of one afflicted as she was caused ceremonial defilement until the evening. JFB states the same law at v. 27 and then the inference the narrative forces, that the defiling disease could not be communicated to this Healer. Gill says the flux was in itself an uncleanness that unfitted her for the society of others. So ἥψατο (G680) is not a neutral verb in this setting: it is a legal act of contact, and Mark records its result moving outward from Jesus (v. 30, δύναμιν ἐξελθοῦσαν) rather than inward to Him. Mark never cites Leviticus; the law is the frame the commentators supply and the story assumes.
Leviticus 15:19-30
basis: Cross-Testament Greek to Hebrew, so no shared Strong's number is possible and no verbal link is claimed. Recorded basis: Cambridge cites Leviticus 15:19-27 at Mark 5:25 and Leviticus 15:19 at Mark 5:33, JFB states the ceremonial law at Mark 5:27, Gill cites Leviticus 15:25 at Mark 5:33; shared legal pattern of defiling contact.
The hand on the corpse: Numbers 19 and the second touch structural / thematic: confirmed
⚙ The unit's other contact is κρατήσας τοῦ παιδίου τῆς χειρός at v. 41 (G2902, to use strength, hold fast), a grip on the hand of a girl whom the professional mourners, the crowd and JFB alike take to be certainly dead. Numbers 19:11 to 13 makes touching a human corpse a seven day uncleanness requiring the water of purification. Set beside the first half of the unit, both halves of Mark 5:21 to 43 turn on the purity law and both run the wrong way through it. Honesty note: not one voice in this brief cites Numbers 19. Cambridge and Gill supply Leviticus for the woman, nobody supplies Numbers for the child, and the pairing is our own reading of the Torah text, offered as pattern and not as a quotation or an echo Mark signals.
Numbers 19:11-13
basis: Cross-Testament Greek to Hebrew, so no shared Strong's lexeme is available and nothing verbal is claimed. Basis is the plain content of Numbers 19:11-13 (corpse contact defiles) set against Mark 5:41 (κρατέω G2902 of a dead child's hand), a shared legal pattern only. Provenance of the pairing is the machine's, not any voice in this brief.
The fringe, and the healing in His wings flagged: verify source
⚙ Two things need separating here. First, the fringe: Cambridge at v. 28 grounds the tassel of blue on Numbers 15:37 to 40 and Deuteronomy 22:12, and Pulpit at v. 27 says the blue fringe was worn to remind Israel they were God's people. But Mark writes only ἱματίου, garment (G2440); it is Matthew and Luke who write κράσπεδον, the fringe, as Pulpit notes. Second, Malachi 4:2, the sun of righteousness with healing in His wings, which many expositors join to the hem she touched; the ground usually given is that the Hebrew word for wing is also used of the corner or skirt of a garment, and we note that we have not verified that lexical claim from any source in this brief. No voice here makes the link at all, and Mark's own vocabulary does not invite it. We therefore flag the Malachi connection rather than assert it, and we flag the fringe detail as reaching Mark's text from the parallels.
Numbers 15:38-39 · Malachi 4:2
basis: The Numbers 15 half is sourced (Cambridge at Mark 5:28, Pulpit at Mark 5:27) but attaches to κράσπεδον in Matthew and Luke, not to Mark's ἱματίου. The Malachi 4:2 half is unsourced in this brief: no named commentator here joins it, and a Hebrew to Greek pair cannot carry a shared Strong's basis in any case. Verify against a commentator who actually makes the claim before upgrading.
Elijah at Sarepta, Elisha at Shunem, and a word only typological
⚙ Cambridge sets the raising beside its two Old Testament antecedents and reads the difference as the point: there is no crying to the Lord and no stretching upon the child three times, as with Elijah at Sarepta (1 Kings 17:21), and no lying upon the child mouth to mouth and eye to eye, as with Elisha (2 Kings 4:34); He speaks a word and is obeyed instantly. Pulpit records Trench's observation that Elisha also cleared the room first (2 Kings 4:33), which makes even the ἐκβαλὼν πάντας of v. 40 part of the pattern. This is a figural reading of prophet-shaped precedent, and it is ancient and widely held, but it is not a quotation, and Greek against Hebrew can produce no shared lexeme.
1 Kings 17:17-24 · 2 Kings 4:18-37
basis: Cross-Testament Greek to Hebrew: no shared Strong's numbers are possible, so the link is figural, not verbal. Recorded basis: Cambridge at Mark 5:42 explicitly contrasts 1 Kings 17:21 and 2 Kings 4:34, and Pulpit at Mark 5:40 cites Trench on 2 Kings 4:33. Widely held rather than novel; no quotation claimed.
Jairus and the flux: the synoptic parallels, verbally confirmed verbal / quotation: confirmed
⚙ This is the one place in the unit where a verbal badge is honest, because the comparison is Greek to Greek. The Verifier reports the rare lexemes shared with Luke's telling: Ἰάειρος (G2383) stands in only two verses of the canon, here and Luke 8:41, and ῥύσις (G4511) in only three, all of them this single healing. Add ἀρχισυνάγωγος (G752, nine verses) and ἅπτομαι (G680) across Luke 8:44 and 8:47. Matthew 9:20 shares γυνή, ἔτος and δώδεκα. Nearly every commentator in this brief works from the parallels rather than around them: Poole and Barnes refer the reader wholesale to Matthew 9, JFB weighs Matthew's placement of the scene against Mark's, and Ellicott notes that Mark gives the girl's age at the end, Luke at the beginning, Matthew not at all, which he takes as a mark of independence in the three accounts.
Luke 8:41 · Luke 8:44 · Matthew 9:20
basis: Verifier computed bases, all within the Greek New Testament: G2383 Ἰάειρος (in 2 vv, rare) at Luke 8:41; G4511 ῥύσις (in 3 vv, rare) at Luke 8:43 and 8:44; G752 ἀρχισυνάγωγος (in 9 vv) at Luke 8:49 and Luke 8:41; G680 ἅπτομαι (in 33 vv) at Luke 8:44 and 8:47; G1135 γυνή, G2094 ἔτος, G1427 δώδεκα at Matthew 9:20. The rare lexemes carry the verbal tier.
Two rare words, and what they settle verbal / quotation: confirmed
⚙ Mark uses two words in this unit that occur in only one other verse each, and in both cases the rarity does real interpretive work. θυγάτριον (G2365, the diminutive daughterling) appears here at v. 23 and again at Mark 7:25 of the Syrophoenician woman's little daughter, the Gospel's other account of a parent pleading for a girl and of a suppliant who takes a place beneath the table; Cambridge lists the diminutive among Mark's habits of speech. παρακούω (G3878) appears at v. 36 and at Matthew 18:17, where it means refusing to hear, and Pulpit argues from precisely that single parallel that Mark's word carries both senses here, overhearing and not heeding, which is why the Revised reading affects how the verse is translated.
Mark 7:25 · Matthew 18:17
basis: Verifier computed bases, Greek to Greek within the New Testament: G2365 θυγάτριον (in 2 vv, rare) shared with Mark 7:25, alongside G4228 πούς and G1135 γυνή; G3878 παρακούω (in 2 vv, rare) shared with Matthew 18:17. Both are real verbal links between Greek texts; no claim is made that either is a quotation of the other, and Pulpit's argument at Mark 5:36 rests on the same lexical fact.
Polluted in thine own blood: Ezekiel 16 as the commentators' lens typological
⚙ Both JFB and Gill reach for the same Old Testament text when they read the woman figurally. JFB calls her case an emblem of our natural state as fallen creatures and cites Ezekiel 16:5 and 6; Gill closes his note on v. 25 by quoting Ezekiel 16:6, when I passed by thee and saw thee polluted in thine own blood, I said unto thee, when thou wast in thy blood, Live. The shared image is blood as both defilement and helplessness, met by a word that gives life. This is the figural reading of two named expositors, offered here as their reading, not as a link Mark asserts; the tie to Ezekiel's Hebrew cannot be lexical across the Testaments.
Ezekiel 16:5-6
basis: Cross-Testament Greek to Hebrew, so no shared Strong's lexeme and nothing verbal claimed. Recorded basis: JFB at Mark 5:26 cites Ezekiel 16:5, 6 as emblem of the natural state, and Gill at Mark 5:25 quotes Ezekiel 16:6 directly. A figural reading held by these commentators, not a citation by the evangelist.