AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The crumbs and the little dogs: Matthew's parallel verbal / quotation: confirmed
Matthew 15:21-28 tells the same encounter, and the two accounts share the two rarest words in the unit. κυνάριον (G2952, little dog) occurs in only four verses in the New Testament, and ψιχίον (G5589, crumb) in only two, both of them this exchange and Matthew's. The Verifier ranks Matthew 15:27 and Matthew 15:26 as the top two candidates for this unit on exactly that basis. The differences are as instructive as the agreement: Matthew has her call him Son of David and records “great is thy faith”; Mark has neither, but alone preserves “let the children first be filled,” which Ellicott flags as peculiar to him, and Ellicott also notes that Mark's “eat of the children's crumbs” varies slightly from Matthew's “crumbs that fall from their masters' table.” JFB and Cambridge both reconstruct the full dialogue by going to Matthew for the links Mark omits.
Matthew 15:26 · Matthew 15:27 · Matthew 15:22
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G2952 κυνάριον (in 4 vv) and G5589 ψιχίον (in 2 vv), both rare, plus G3483 ναί (in 30 vv) and G740 ἄρτος; Greek to Greek within the New Testament, so the verbal tier is available
Two little daughters: Jairus and the Syrophoenician verbal / quotation: confirmed
θυγάτριον (G2365, a daughterling) occurs in only two verses in the whole New Testament, and both are Mark's: 5:23, where a ruler of the synagogue falls at his feet for his little daughter, and 7:25, where a Canaanite mother falls at his feet for hers. The Verifier confirms the shared lexeme. Mark gives both petitioners the same posture, falling at his feet. The cures then go different ways, and the difference should not be blurred: Jairus gets Jesus in the house, taking the child by the hand, while this mother gets a sentence and a walk home. ⚙ We take the pairing as deliberate composition rather than coincidence, though Mark makes no comment on it: a ruler of the synagogue and a woman of the stock of Canaan reach for the same rare diminutive, and neither is finally refused.
Mark 5:23
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G2365 θυγάτριον (in 2 vv), a maximally rare word occurring only here and at Mark 5:23; both texts Greek, no quotation claimed, the link is lexical
Ἑλληνίς: the only other Greek woman in the New Testament verbal / quotation: confirmed
The feminine noun Ἑλληνίς (G1674) occurs in only two verses. Here it marks the first Gentile in Mark's Gospel to receive anything from Jesus' hand; at Acts 17:12 it marks the prominent Greek women who believed at Berea when the word went to a European city. Barnes and Ellicott both explain that in Jewish usage the term classified religion rather than ancestry, and Ellicott compares the later use of “Frank” in the East for any European. ⚙ Placing the two verses side by side is our own observation of what the rare word joins: the same label stands over the woman who argued for crumbs and over the households that later received the whole loaf.
Acts 17:12
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G1674 Ἑλληνίς (in 2 vv), the only two occurrences in the New Testament; both Greek texts, lexical link only, no quotation
Those who could not stay hidden verbal / quotation: confirmed
Mark says Jesus οὐκ ἠδυνήθη λαθεῖν, could not be hidden, and then a woman προσέπεσεν, falls at his feet. Luke 8:47 uses both rare verbs of another woman, who saw that she had not escaped notice and fell down before him; Mark 3:11 uses προσπίπτω of the unclean spirits that fall before him, and in the same chapter Mark notes that his fame had already reached Tyre and Sidon, which JFB and Pulpit both cite to explain how she had heard. The same two verbs therefore carry the concealment that failed and the posture that answered it.
Luke 8:47 · Mark 3:11
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G2990 λανθάνω (in 6 vv) and G4363 προσπίπτω (in 8 vv) with Luke 8:47, and G4363 with Mark 3:11; both rare, all texts Greek, no quotation claimed
Elijah went to Phoenicia too typological
Cambridge makes the link explicitly at v. 24: as Elijah travelled out of his own land into Phoenicia, so Jesus now goes to the borders of Tyre. The shape is the same in every particular Mark reports: a prophet of Israel withdrawing from official hostility into Gentile territory, received by a woman who is not an Israelite, and restoring her child. ⚙ Where 1 Kings gives a raising from death and Mark an exorcism, the figural reading is that the second answers the first. This is a typological claim and we mark it as such. It cannot be a verbal link: 1 Kings is Hebrew and Mark is Greek, so no shared Strong's lexeme is possible between them, and none is asserted.
1 Kings 17:8-24
basis: Cross-Testament (Hebrew to Greek), so no shared Strong's number can be computed and none is claimed; the basis is the shared narrative pattern of prophet, Phoenician territory, Gentile woman, restored child, named at this verse by the Cambridge Bible. Widely held, not novel
Let the children first be fed: Israel's priority structural / thematic: confirmed
The premise Jesus states and the woman concedes is Israel's prior claim on the bread. Deuteronomy 7:6 and 14:2 name Israel a people holy to the LORD, chosen out of all peoples for his own possession; Psalm 147:19-20 says he declared his word to Jacob and has not dealt so with any nation. Gill reads Mark's πρῶτον straight into the apostolic practice of preaching to the Jew first and then to the Gentile, which is Paul's formula at Romans 1:16. ⚙ The thread is a motif, not a citation: Mark quotes none of these texts and neither do we claim he does.
Deuteronomy 7:6 · Deuteronomy 14:2 · Psalm 147:19-20 · Romans 1:16
basis: Cross-Testament and cross-language, so no shared lexeme is computable; the Verifier returned no candidate for these pairs. Recorded basis is the shared motif of Israel's covenantal priority, drawn by Gill from πρῶτον. No quotation claimed
The foreigner at the table: the promise she reached for structural / thematic: confirmed
Her argument assumes that the household of God has a floor as well as a table, and Israel's own Scriptures had said so before her. Genesis 12:3 promises that in Abraham all the families of the earth will be blessed; 1 Kings 8:41-43 has Solomon pray for the foreigner who comes from a far country toward that house; Isaiah 49:6 calls the servant a light to the nations, and Isaiah 56:3-8 tells the foreigner who has joined himself to the LORD not to say “the LORD will surely separate me from his people,” for his house shall be called a house of prayer for all peoples. ⚙ Mark does not cite any of these, and the woman does not quote them. We record the connection as thematic only, and note that it is the reading behind Cambridge's and Pulpit's figural comments rather than an explicit New Testament use of the Old.
Genesis 12:3 · 1 Kings 8:41-43 · Isaiah 49:6 · Isaiah 56:3-8
basis: Cross-Testament (Hebrew to Greek): shared Strong's numbers are impossible and none is asserted. Basis is the shared motif of the foreigner admitted to the house of God, with no quotation or verbal echo claimed
Tyre under the oracles, Tyre under the table structural / thematic: confirmed
Tyre and Sidon are not neutral ground in the canon. Isaiah 23:1-18 and Ezekiel 28:1-23 pronounce judgment on Tyre's pride and commerce, and Joel 3:4-8 charges Tyre and Sidon with selling the children of Judah. Cambridge fills in the history Mark assumes: Hiram's cedar for David and Solomon, and then Ahab's marriage to the daughter of Ithobal king of Tyre, which brought in the worship of Baal. ⚙ Our reading is that Mark chooses the one border in Israel's memory most saturated with judgment, and stages there the one scene in which a Gentile out-argues the Messiah into mercy. The link is thematic and geographical; no quotation exists, and a verbal tier would be impossible in any case across the language boundary.
Isaiah 23:1-18 · Ezekiel 28:1-23 · Joel 3:4-8
basis: Cross-Testament (Hebrew to Greek), no shared Strong's lexeme computable or claimed. Basis is the shared subject, Tyre and Sidon, and the motif of judgment on Phoenicia against which Mark's setting is read; the historical background is sourced from the Cambridge Bible note at 7:24
The frame of borders: 7:24 and 7:31 structural / thematic: confirmed
Mark encloses this episode between two statements of territory. The Verifier confirms that 7:31 shares ὅριον (G3725), Τύρος (G5184) and ἐξέρχομαι (G1831) with 7:24. The third of these is the same verb Mark uses twice of the demon that has gone out, so the departure from the borders and the departure of the spirit are told with one word. ⚙ That overlap is our observation; the shared lexemes are the Verifier's.
Mark 7:31
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G3725 ὅριον (in 11 vv), G5184 Τύρος (in 11 vv) and G1831 ἐξέρχομαι (in 212 vv). The lexemes are real, but only moderately uncommon, and what we are claiming is a framing pattern and not a quotation, so we tier this thematic and under-claim on purpose
Fed full: the verb of the loaves structural / thematic: confirmed
Jesus does not say the children must be served, but that they must be χορτασθῆναι, fed to the full. We checked the pairs with the Verifier ourselves, and G5526 χορτάζω (fifteen verses) is shared with Mark 6:42, where the five thousand in Jewish territory ate and were satisfied, and with Mark 8:8, where the crowd on the far side of the lake ate and were satisfied in the same words. Mark has therefore placed this refusal between two satisfied crowds and built the refusal out of their verb. ⚙ Our reading is that the sequence answers the saying: the children are fed first in chapter 6, this woman is answered in chapter 7, and the loaves are broken again beyond the border in chapter 8. Gill reaches the same order by a different road, saying that when the Jews had despised the provision the Gentiles would have plenty set before them, eat of them, and be filled.
Mark 6:42 · Mark 8:8
basis: Verifier pair check run by us: shared Greek lexeme G5526 χορτάζω (in 15 vv) with both Mark 6:42 and Mark 8:8; the Verifier itself tiers both pairs structural / thematic, and we keep that tier rather than claiming a quotation