AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The dust actually shaken: Paul and Barnabas at Antioch verbal / quotation: confirmed
Luke narrates the command of v. 14 being carried out in the same two uncommon words. ἐκτινάσσω (G1621, to shake violently) stands in only four verses in the Greek New Testament and κονιορτός (G2868, blown dust) in only five, and Acts 13:51 has both, of Paul and Barnabas leaving Pisidian Antioch. Gill, Barnes, Ellicott, Cambridge and Pulpit all cite the verse at this point, Cambridge adding Acts 18:6. The Verifier confirms the shared lexemes; both texts are Greek, so the link is genuinely verbal.
Acts 13:51 · Acts 18:6
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G1621 ἐκτινάσσω (in 4 vv) and G2868 κονιορτός (in 5 vv), both rare, plus G4228 πούς (in 86 vv); Greek to Greek, so a real verbal link. Acts 18:6 is added on the commentators' testimony (Cambridge, Gill), not on a Verifier basis.
The same kit, three times refused verbal / quotation: confirmed
The equipment list is repeated in every Synoptic sending, and the shared vocabulary is distinctive rather than generic: ζώνη (G2223, belt) stands in only seven verses and Mark 6:8 has it with ὁδός and παραγγέλλω; πήρα (G4082, food-wallet, six verses) and ὑπόδημα (G5266, sandal, ten verses) tie this verse to the sending of the Seventy in Luke 10:4; χιτών (G5509, ten verses) ties it to Luke 9:3. The famous discrepancy over the staff falls inside this same cluster, and JFB, Barnes, Poole and Ellicott each resolve it by the force of κτήσησθε, acquire rather than carry.
Mark 6:8 · Luke 9:3 · Luke 10:4
basis: Verifier: Mark 6:8 shares G2223 ζώνη (in 7 vv), G3853 παραγγέλλω (in 31 vv), G3598 ὁδός (in 99 vv); Luke 10:4 shares G4082 πήρα (in 6 vv), G5266 ὑπόδημα (in 10 vv), G3598 ὁδός; Luke 9:3 shares G5509 χιτών (in 10 vv), G1417 δύο, G3598 ὁδός. Several rare lexemes, all Greek to Greek.
Search it out: a verb used three times in the New Testament verbal / quotation: confirmed
ἐξετάζω (G1833, to test thoroughly by questioning) occurs in only three verses of the Greek New Testament, and the company it keeps is striking. Herod uses it to have the magi “search out carefully” concerning the child (Matthew 2:8); John uses it of the disciples by the sea who “durst not ask” the risen Lord who he was (John 21:12); and here the Twelve are to use it on a strange town. Pulpit is right that “much more is implied than merely asking some chance passer-by,” and cross-references Matthew 2:8 for exactly this reason. ⚙ We record the rare lexical link and leave any ironic reading of it as our own suggestion, not a claim of the text.
Matthew 2:8 · John 21:12
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G1833 ἐξετάζω (in 3 vv), one of the rarest links available in the New Testament; Greek to Greek. The thematic irony we draw from it is machine synthesis and is marked as such.
The lost sheep and the shepherds who lost them structural / thematic: confirmed
“Lost sheep” is not a fresh metaphor. Pulpit says the words “recall Jeremiah 50:6 (27:6, LXX.), ‘My people hath been lost sheep’”; Poole quotes the same prophetic sentence with its own explanation, “their shepherds have caused them to go astray”; JFB adds Ezekiel 34:2-6, where the shepherds feed themselves and the flock is scattered; Gill says respect “seems to be had” to Jeremiah. The charge in the phrase falls on Israel's teachers, which is why Matthew 9:36 has just described the crowds as sheep without a shepherd. This is a cross-Testament link: Matthew's Greek and Jeremiah's and Ezekiel's Hebrew cannot share Strong's numbers, so no verbal tier is possible here, and the basis is the motif plus the commentators' testimony.
Jeremiah 50:6 · Ezekiel 34:6 · Matthew 9:36
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's numbers are impossible by definition and no verbal tier may be claimed. Basis is the shared shepherd and scattered-flock pattern, recorded by Pulpit (Jeremiah 50:6), Poole (the same verse), JFB (Jeremiah 50:6, 17; Ezekiel 34:2-6) and Gill. Matthew 9:36 is added from the same Gospel context, cited by Benson and Pulpit.
Sodom, kept in the New Testament's memory verbal / quotation: confirmed
The two city-names of v. 15 return together across the New Testament as the standing example of judgment: Paul quotes Isaiah 1:9 at Romans 9:29, and both 2 Peter 2:6 and Jude 1:7 hold up the cities as a set example. Barnes cites 2 Peter 2:6 and Jude 1:7 at exactly this point, and Gill notes that the Jews of the time held the men of Sodom to have no part in the world to come (Mishnah Sanhedrin 10:3). Both names are rare in the Greek New Testament.
Romans 9:29 · 2 Peter 2:6 · Jude 1:7
basis: Verifier: Romans 9:29 shares G1116 Γόμοῤῥα (in 4 vv) and G4670 Σόδομα (in 9 vv), both rare; Greek to Greek. 2 Peter 2:6 and Jude 1:7 register on the Verifier only through the common G4172 πόλις (in 155 vv), and are joined here on the commentators' citation (Barnes), not on a rare-lexeme basis.
Fire from heaven and a door shut on a poor man typological
The comparison in v. 15 reaches back to Genesis 19:24-25, where the Lord rained fire and brimstone on Sodom and Gomorrah and overthrew the cities and all the plain. Barnes names the destruction and its site; Poole names Genesis 19:24 explicitly; Ellicott observes that these cities “stood out, in the history of the world, as most conspicuous for their infamy.” ⚙ The figural reading is that the overthrow of the plain becomes the measuring rod for a refusal of the gospel, so that a closed door in a Galilean village is weighed against fire from heaven and found heavier. This reading is ancient and widely held among the sourced voices; it cannot be tiered verbal, because Matthew's Greek and Genesis's Hebrew share no Strong's numbers.
Genesis 19:24-25 · Matthew 11:23-24
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew): no shared Strong's lexemes are possible, so the link is figural, not verbal. Basis is the explicit naming of Sodom and Gomorrah in the verse itself plus the destruction narrative cited by Barnes (Genesis 19:24-25) and Poole (Genesis 19:24). Widely held, not novel.
More bearable in the day of judgment: a refrain in Matthew and Luke structural / thematic: confirmed
The same sentence recurs at Matthew 11:24, of Capernaum, and in Luke's charge to the Seventy at Luke 10:12. Cambridge's entire note on v. 15 is the cross-reference to Matthew 11:24; Pulpit notes the parallel in Luke and warns that the combination of contexts in Luke 10 is “an instructive warning against accepting the present position of our Lord's sayings as the final indication of the occasion upon which they were delivered.” The shared lexemes are real but common, so this is recorded as pattern rather than quotation.
Matthew 11:24 · Luke 10:12
basis: Verifier: Matthew 11:24 shares G2920 κρίσις (in 46 vv) and G2228 ἤ; Luke 10:12 shares G4172 πόλις (in 155 vv) and G2228 ἤ. All common lexemes, so no rare-word basis exists for a verbal tier; the link is the repeated saying-pattern, cited by Cambridge and Pulpit.
Gold, silver, copper: the three metals a herald will not carry structural / thematic: confirmed
The triad χρυσός / ἄργυρος / χαλκός (G5557, G696, G5475) is uncommon in the Greek New Testament, and where it recurs it is nearly always under judgment on wealth: the cargo of fallen Babylon (Revelation 18:12), the rusted riches that testify against their owners (James 5:3), the idols of Athens (Acts 17:29), and the materials tested by fire on the foundation (1 Corinthians 3:12). ⚙ We record the shared vocabulary; the thematic reading, that the mission is deliberately stripped of the metals that elsewhere stand under fire, is our synthesis and is offered as such.
Revelation 18:12 · James 5:3 · 1 Corinthians 3:12 · Acts 17:29
basis: Verifier: Revelation 18:12 shares G5557 χρυσός (in 9 vv), G5475 χαλκός (in 5 vv), G696 ἄργυρος (in 5 vv); James 5:3, 1 Corinthians 3:12 and Acts 17:29 share G5557 and G696. Rare lexemes are present, but there is no quotation and no argument from one passage to another, so the tier is deliberately held at structural rather than verbal.