That same day Jesus went out of the house and sat by the sea.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
En ekeinē tē hēmera ho Iēsous exelthōn tēs oikias ekathēto para tēn thalassan
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Parable of the Sower
Matthew 13:1–9 — The Parable of the Sower. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
That same day Jesus went out of the house and sat by the sea.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
En ekeinē tē hēmera ho Iēsous exelthōn tēs oikias ekathēto para tēn thalassan
Such large crowds gathered around Him that He got into a boat and sat down, while all the people stood on the shore.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai polloi ochloi synēchthēsan pros auton hōste auton embanta eis ploion kathēsthai kai pas ho ochlos heistēkei epi ton aigialon
And He told them many things in parables, saying, “A farmer went out to sow his seed.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai elalēsen autois polla en parabolais legōn Idou ho speirōn exēlthen tou speirein
And as he was sowing, some seed fell along the path, and the birds came and devoured it.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai en auton tō speirein men ha epesen para tēn hodon kai ta peteina elthonta katephagen auta
Some fell on rocky ground, where it did not have much soil. It sprang up quickly because the soil was shallow.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de Alla epesen epi ta petrōdē hopou ouk eichen pollēn gēn kai exaneteilen eutheōs dia gēs to echein mē bathos
But when the sun rose, the seedlings were scorched, and they withered because they had no root.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de hēliou anateilantos ekaumatisthē kai exēranthē dia to echein mē rhizan
Other seed fell among thorns, which grew up and choked the seedlings.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de Alla epesen epi tas akanthas kai hai akanthai anebēsan kai epnixan auta
Still other seed fell on good soil and produced a crop—a hundredfold, sixtyfold, or thirtyfold.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de Alla epesen epi tēn kalēn tēn gēn kai edidou karpon men ho hekaton de ho hexēkonta de ho triakonta
He who has ears, let him hear.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Ho echōn ōta akouetō
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
Matthew gives one main verb to the opening scene and it is not a verb of motion: ἐκάθητο, imperfect, "he was sitting." The leaving of the house is a participle hung on it. Cambridge identifies the posture flatly: sitting is "The usual position of a Jewish teacher," and Gill records that the convention had the doctor sit and the hearers stand, which is exactly what v. 2 then describes with its pluperfect εἱστήκει. Pulpit reads endurance in that tense, a crowd that had taken its stand and stayed. Ellicott supplies the day's back-story from chapter 12, the Pharisaic malice and the plots, and argues that these drove the Lord to a form of teaching "better also as a test of character"; that is Ellicott's reconstruction of motive, offered as inference, and we flag it as such. What the text itself says is smaller and stranger: the crowd is συνήχθησαν, a passive, gathered rather than gathering, and so large that the teacher must put water between himself and it. Henry takes the improvised pulpit as an instruction in worship, not to covet what is stately "but to make the best of the conveniences God in his providence allots to us." JFB, with a different instinct, hears an eyewitness: "How graphic this picture!"
Ellicott marks παραβολαῖς as the word's first appearance in Matthew and notes that the disciples' question at v. 10 shows the form was new to them; he traces the Greek term to the Septuagint's rendering of Hebrew mashal. Cambridge draws the boundary: parables "differ from fables in being pictures of possible occurrences." Benson and Poole, independently, give nearly identical rules of reading, and both insist that the main scope of a parable, not its incidental furniture, is what instructs. Barnes lists four purposes, including the one modern readers flinch at, to conceal from part of the audience what was meant for others. Then the Greek itself: ἐξῆλθεν stands first in the clause, and Pulpit reads the fronting as attention drawn "not so much to the sower himself as to his action." Ellicott and Pulpit both hold the article, the sower, against BSB's "A farmer": Ellicott's sower is "the man whose form and work were so familiar ... to the peasants of Galilee," which is how an article can be both definite and anonymous.
The structure is carried by a single repeated verb, ἔπεσεν, falling four times over four grounds, and Matthew keeps the seeds plural where Mark and Luke have one collective, which Pulpit notices: "the seeds are, so to speak, each singled out." The three failures fail differently and the vocabulary is precise about it. On the road the loss is instant and total: κατέφαγεν, eaten down. Ellicott has the picture, hard smooth surface, grain lying on top, birds already following the sower; Gill identifies the birds from Matthew 13:19 as the evil one's, and Henry says Satan "is the great thief of sermons." On rock the loss is fast and hot: Ellicott's mordant sentence is that growth was rapid "through the very circumstance which was afterwards fatal," and Cambridge supplies the physics, sun on thin soil warming the rock beneath. Pulpit hears the Greek turning on itself, the seedling's ἐξανέτειλεν answered by the sun's ἀνατείλαντος: "It can hardly be accidental." Among thorns the loss is slow: Ellicott notes the thorns were invisible at sowing time, their roots left under a field that looked cleared, and that the ears "were slowly strangled till they died away." Two of the three failures, then, are failures of what is underground and unseen at the moment of sowing. That is the parable's anatomy, and it is why the verdict cannot be delivered on the day.
Ellicott holds the article here too, "the good ground," and the doubled attributive τὴν καλὴν τὴν γῆν presses on the adjective. καλός is Strong's "fair, good, honest, meet, well, worthy": Gill's "good, honest hearted hearers" is a fair gloss of a word that is not merely agricultural. The yield verb is ἐδίδου, imperfect: it kept giving, and Pulpit notes that Matthew's choice of give over Luke's make means "effort is not implied." Ellicott documents the hundredfold from Isaac at Genesis 26:12 and Gill adds Pliny and the rabbis, so the number is extraordinary without being fantastic. Barnes then puts up a fence we have tried to respect: "Parables are designed to teach some general truth, and the circumstances should not be pressed too much in explaining them," which forbids reading the three-to-one ratio of failure as a census. And the close is a command, third person present imperative, ἀκουέτω, over a story left publicly unexplained. Poole: our Saviour left "the generality of the hearers to study out his meaning." Pulpit sees that the formula is not merely an appendix but "in itself a summary of the chief lesson of the parable." Gill splits the hearing in two, external and internal, which is the whole difference between the four soils.
⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested against the text. Read the parable as a defence of the Sower rather than as a taxonomy of hearers. Four times Matthew writes the same verb, ἔπεσεν, and never once writes that the sower stopped, changed his aim, or sowed less. He walks the same field, scatters at the same rate, over road and rock and thorn and good soil alike. If the parable were about method, that is incompetence; because it is about the word, it is generosity. Note also what the failures have in common: on the road the problem is what has been walked over it, on the rock what lies under it, among thorns what was left rooting below a surface that looked cleared. Only the first failure is visible on the day of sowing. So the parable is not a tool for sorting the crowd on the beach, and Barnes is right to forbid pressing the proportions; the sole test it gives is καρπός, fruit, and fruit arrives late. Which means the honest use of this parable is self-examination and patience, not diagnosis of the person next to you. Gill and Henry both hear the failures as descriptions of heart, and Matthew 13:19-23 backs them; where we hesitate to follow Gill is in his certainty that the rocky ground was never a real saint, because v. 6 states only that there was no root, and the burden of proof for the rest lies on a doctrine brought in from elsewhere. And the last word is not a verdict but an imperative in the present tense: keep hearing. The line that follows is ours, not Scripture, and carries no authority of its own.
The sower's hand never slows for the road, the rock, or the thorns; the only place the story hurries is the ground that dies.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
Mark 4:4-8 and Luke 8:5 carry the parable in substantially the same Greek, and the Verifier confirms lexeme overlap verse by verse, including the rare καυματίζω and ῥίζα at Mark 4:6 against Matthew 13:6. The differences are small and real, and the commentators log them: Pulpit notes Matthew singles the seeds out as plurals where Mark and Luke take them collectively; Ellicott cites Luke 8:6's "because they lacked moisture" beside Matthew's "no root"; Pulpit notes Mark's numbers ascend where Matthew's descend, and Luke keeps only the hundredfold. Poole judges the variations immaterial "being they are in the parable."
Mark 4:4 · Mark 4:5 · Mark 4:6 · Mark 4:7 · Mark 4:8 · Luke 8:5
basis: Verifier: Mark 4:6 shares G2739 καυματίζω (in 4 vv, rare), G4491 ῥίζα (in 16 vv), G393 ἀνατέλλω (in 9 vv); Mark 4:5 shares G4098 πίπτω (in 86 vv) and G4183 πολύς; Mark 4:4 and Luke 8:5 share G4687 σπείρω (in 42 vv) and G3844 παρά. Greek to Greek, and the rare shared καυματίζω carries the tier.
The parable in this unit is left unexplained in public; the explanation comes privately at Matthew 13:18-23, and the Verifier confirms the lexical tie through σπείρω at 13:20 and 13:23, with εὐθέως at 13:20 picking up v. 5's haste. This is the one authority that outranks every commentator here, and it is what licenses Gill to name the birds as the evil one, Henry to read the thorns as worldly care, and Gill again to identify the sower from 13:37 as the Son of Man.
Matthew 13:19 · Matthew 13:20 · Matthew 13:23 · Matthew 13:37
basis: Verifier: Matthew 13:23 shares G4687 σπείρω (in 42 vv) twice with this unit plus G3303 μέν; Matthew 13:20 shares G4687 σπείρω twice plus G2112 εὐθέως (in 86 vv). Same book, same discourse, same speaker; Greek to Greek.
ἐκαυματίσθη (G2739) occurs in only four verses: Matthew 13:6, Mark 4:6, and Revelation 16:8-9, where the fourth bowl gives the sun power to scorch men with fire and they blaspheme the name of God and do not repent. Both places are heat on what has no defence; both end in no fruit. We claim no citation and no authorial intent: the commentators here do not draw this line, and Matthew shows no awareness of the Apocalypse. What is confirmed is that the same rare verb names the fate of the rootless seedling and the fate of the unrepentant under judgment.
Revelation 16:8 · Revelation 16:9
basis: Verifier: shared G2739 καυματίζω (in 4 vv, rare) at both Revelation 16:8 and 16:9, with G2246 ἥλιος (in 32 vv) also shared at 16:8. Greek to Greek, rare lexeme. Verbal link only: no quotation and no dependence is claimed in either direction.
James 1:11 puts ἀνατέλλω, ἥλιος and ξηραίνω in one sentence, exactly the trio of Matthew 13:6, and applies it to the rich man fading in the midst of his pursuits. Matthew 13:22 will name the deceitfulness of riches as the thorn rather than the sun, so the two passages cross rather than duplicate; but the picture of a sun that rises and dries out what looked alive is common property, and James's so also will the rich man fade away is the same verdict given to a different soil.
James 1:11
basis: Verifier: shared G393 ἀνατέλλω (in 9 vv, rare), G2246 ἥλιος (in 32 vv), G3583 ξηραίνω (in 15 vv). Greek to Greek, three shared lexemes of which one is rare. The shared vocabulary is confirmed; the application differs, and no literary dependence is asserted.
Jeremiah 4:3 tells Judah to break up the fallow ground and not sow among thorns, which is the parable's third soil stated as a command centuries before it was told as a story. Both Gill and Pulpit reach for the verse at Matthew 13:7, Pulpit noting that thorns "were sure to be close by" and Gill citing Jeremiah directly. The prophet addresses the field's owner and tells him to prepare the ground; the parable addresses everyone and asks what kind of ground they are.
Jeremiah 4:3
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's numbers are impossible by definition and no verbal tier can apply. The basis is the shared agricultural figure of seed among thorns, and the recorded citation of Jeremiah 4:3 at this verse by both Gill and Pulpit.
Ellicott anchors the parable's top number in Genesis 26:12, where Isaac sowed in the land and reaped a hundredfold in the same year, and the LORD blessed him; he suggests the episode "had probably helped to make it the standard of a more than usually prosperous harvest." Gill cites the same verse, adding Pliny on Byzacium and a rabbinic report. The point of the cross-reference is restraint: the hundredfold is a remembered blessing in Israel's own story, not an impossible figure invented for effect.
Genesis 26:12
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so no shared Strong's lexeme is possible and the link cannot be tiered verbal. The basis is the shared hundredfold yield formula, recorded by Ellicott, Gill and Pulpit at Matthew 13:8.
Henry and Gill both close the thorn soil with Hebrews 6:8, the ground that bears thorns and thistles, is rejected, is near to being cursed, and whose end is burning. Henry: worldly cares "are entangling, vexing, scratching, and their end is to be burned, Heb 6:8." The connection is real in the commentators and the imagery is shared, but Matthew's v. 7 says only that the thorns choked the seed. The fire is Hebrews' contribution.
Hebrews 6:8
basis: No Verifier-computed lexeme match was returned for this pair, so no verbal claim is made. The recorded basis is the shared figure of thorn-bearing ground under curse, cited at this verse by Henry and by Gill independently.
αἰγιαλός (G123), the wave-dashed beach of v. 2, is a rare word, and Acts 27:39 is one of only six New Testament verses that use it: Paul's crew sighting a bay with a beach onto which they hope to drive the ship. We record the link modestly and without theological weight. It is topography, not typology, and its value is that it confirms the concreteness Pulpit claims for the detail: the evangelist names a specific kind of shore, sand or pebble, the way a witness would.
Acts 27:39
basis: Verifier: shared G123 αἰγιαλός (in 6 vv, rare) plus G4143 πλοῖον (in 62 vv) and G2250 ἡμέρα. Greek to Greek and lexically real, but deliberately not tiered verbal: the shared rare noun is an item of setting with no shared claim, motif or quotation, so the honest tier is the lower one.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ The article Ellicott and Pulpit defend, the sower rather than a farmer, is what makes the identification possible at all. Jesus supplies it himself at Matthew 13:37, and Gill draws the line: by the sower "is meant the Son of Man ... which is Jesus Christ himself," adding that he is called the sower "by way of eminency." Henry reaches the same conclusion by a wider route: "The seed sown is the word of God. The sower is our Lord Jesus Christ, by himself, or by his ministers." Both then widen it to preachers without losing the first referent, which is the apostolic pattern: the ministers sow because the Lord sows through them. The reading is ancient and near-universal in the commentators gathered here.
Matthew 13:37 · Mark 4:14
⚙ Matthew uses one verb, ἐξέρχομαι (G1831), for Jesus leaving the house in v. 1 and for the sower going out in v. 3. Gill takes the parable's verb theologically: the sower "went forth from his own house to his field; which, as applied to Christ, may intend his incarnation, his coming into this world by the assumption of human nature, his appearance in the public ministry, in the land of Judea." Note the register: Gill says may intend, and we keep his caution. What the Greek supplies is not proof but a resonance Matthew arranged, a teacher who has just gone out of a house telling of a sower who goes out; and Gill extends the going into the present, Christ going forth still "in his ministers, and by his Spirit, in the preaching of the Gospel."
Matthew 13:3 · Matthew 13:37
⚙ Offered as our own reading, and marked novel as applied to this parable. Every soil in the story is judged by whether the seed can get under its surface, and the two slow deaths, rock and thorn, are failures of what lies below the visible line. The parable therefore stakes everything on burial: nothing here bears fruit that has not first gone down out of sight. John 12:24 states the principle in the same agricultural figure and applies it to Christ himself, the grain of wheat that must fall into the earth and die or remain alone. We do not claim Matthew intends that; the commentators in this brief do not make the connection, and the parable's own explanation at Matthew 13:18-23 reads the seed as the word, not as the Son. What we do claim is that the two figures are governed by one logic, and that the Sower of v. 3 will himself go into the ground before the hundredfold of v. 8 arrives.
John 12:24 · Matthew 13:8
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text. Two places in this unit turn on the critical text and both are recorded by the commentators, not by us. At v. 2 Pulpit and JFB both judge the article before πλοῖον to be a wrong insertion in the Received Text (JFB: "the article in the received text lacks authority"), while Cambridge notes that the received Greek reads "the ship or boat" and Pulpit observes the article would suggest the particular boat kept waiting for him. The interlinear this brief uses has εἰς πλοῖον without the article. At v. 9 Pulpit notes that the Revised Version omits the infinitive "to hear" after "ears," and our interlinear likewise shows only ὦτα with no ἀκούειν; the BSB rendering "He who has ears" follows the shorter text.
Sources. Henry's entry in this brief is a single block covering 13:1-23 and is repeated at every verse; we have therefore used it sparingly and only where its content is specific to the verse in hand. Geneva's entries at vv. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are the verse text alone with no note, so Geneva is quoted once, from its substantive gloss at v. 2. JFB's entry is likewise repeated verbatim at vv. 3 through 9 and is quoted only at v. 2, where it is verse-specific. Poole at vv. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 reads only "See Poole on Matthew 13:9"; his substantive note is quoted from 13:3 and 13:9. Three entries are capped in this brief, all of them at 13:3 (Benson, Poole and Gill); no quotation above is taken from a capped region, and we did not need the remainders for anything claimed here.
What is uncertain. Ellicott's account of why Jesus turned to parables on this day is a reconstruction of motive from chapter 12 and is presented as such. Gill's argument at v. 6 that the rocky ground was never a genuine believer is a doctrinal position imported into the verse; v. 6 says only that there was no root. Gill's reading of the thorns' end as everlasting fire comes from Hebrews 6:8, not from Matthew 13:7. Our own christological third entry is marked novel and rests on a figure from John, not on anything Matthew or the commentators here assert. The three cross-Testament threads (Genesis 26:12, Jeremiah 4:3) and the Hebrews 6:8 thread carry no Verifier lexeme basis, either because the languages differ or because no match was returned, and all are tiered structural for that reason. The Acts 27:39 thread has a genuine rare shared lexeme but is deliberately tiered below verbal, because a shared noun of setting is not a shared claim.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)