When Jesus had finished these parables, He withdrew from that place.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai egeneto hote ho Iēsous etelesen tautas tas parabolas metēren ekeithen
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Rejection at Nazareth
Matthew 13:53–58 — The Rejection at Nazareth. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
When Jesus had finished these parables, He withdrew from that place.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai egeneto hote ho Iēsous etelesen tautas tas parabolas metēren ekeithen
Coming to His hometown, He taught the people in their synagogue, and they were astonished. “Where did this man get such wisdom and miraculous powers?” they asked.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai elthōn eis autou tēn patrida edidasken autous en autōn tē synagōgē hōste autous ekplēssesthai Pothen toutō hautē hē sophia kai hai dynameis kai legein
“Isn’t this the carpenter’s son? Isn’t His mother’s name Mary, and aren’t His brothers James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas?
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
estin ouch houtos ho tou tektonos huios ouch autou hē mētēr legetai Mariam kai autou hoi adelphoi Iakōbos kai Iōsēph kai Simōn kai Ioudas
Aren’t all His sisters with us as well? Where then did this man get all these things?”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
eisin ouchi pasai autou hai adelphai pros hēmas kai pothen oun toutō panta tauta
And they took offense at Him. But Jesus said to them, “Only in his hometown and in his own household is a prophet without honor.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai eskandalizonto en autō de Ho Iēsous eipen autois ei mē en tē patridi kai en tē autou oikia estin prophētēs Ouk atimos
And He did not do many miracles there, because of their unbelief.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai ouk epoiēsen pollas dynameis ekei dia autōn tēn apistian
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
⚙ The unit opens on a joint in Matthew's own carpentry. Καὶ ἐγένετο ὅτε ἐτέλεσεν is not narrative filler: Pulpit names it exactly, "the formula marks the end of an excerpt from the discourses," and cross-refers his note at Matthew 11:1. The Verifier confirms what Pulpit's eye caught, that teleō and hote recur at Matthew 7:28, 11:1 and 19:1, the closing seams of Matthew's five discourse blocks. Then comes μετῆρεν, a verb the Verifier finds in only two New Testament verses, this one and Matthew 19:1, which Pulpit also records. Gill supplies the concrete: he departed from the house he was in and from Capernaum, where he had spent some time. Cambridge, meanwhile, refuses to tidy the chronology, holding "with great probability" that Luke's Nazareth narrative refers to a different and earlier visit; Ellicott concedes that a dislocation of some kind must be admitted in any case, given the almost entire absence of trustworthy notes of sequence; JFB, against the majority of harmonists, holds this was the first and only visit. The FSSB records the disagreement and settles nothing.
⚙ Twice in three verses Nazareth asks πόθεν, whence, and both times the sentence has no verb: only a cold dative, "to this one." They ask after the source of the σοφία and the δυνάμεις, and then answer themselves with a trade and a family register. Benson, quoting Doddridge, turns their own premise against them: the meanness of Christ's education was itself a demonstration that such teaching must come from some extraordinary and divine influence. Gill reaches the same conclusion from the other end, observing that they knew he had never been put to school nor learned letters of men, and did not know that he was the wisdom of God and the power of God. Poole supplies the diagnosis that governs the whole unit: astonishment and admiration flow from ignorance and are no indication of any saving work, and these same astonished men are by and by scandalized. On τέκτων, Barnes presses Mark's harder form ("the carpenter") as near proof that Jesus worked the bench to the age of thirty, and says the infidel who sneers at it praises Peter the Great for the same descent; Benson cites Justin Martyr and the Jewish canon that every parent teach a child a trade; Poole notes soberly that the word will not tell us whether wood or iron. On the brothers and sisters, the FSSB declines to arbitrate: Cambridge judges the cousin and step-brother theories were only ever propounded to protect an assumption; Pulpit follows Lightfoot for sons of Joseph by a former wife; Benson takes them for cousins; and JFB, having laid out all three, says outright that he prefers to leave the vexed question dubiously. Geneva alone names the moral of the questioning: men sin not only through ignorance but knowingly lay stumbling blocks in their own way.
⚙ ἐσκανδαλίζοντο ἐν αὐτῷ is imperfect and it is in him, not at some saying of his: the trap they keep falling over is his person. Ellicott hears the same verb as Matthew 11:6 and states the mechanism, that they could not reconcile the new wisdom with the commonness of the earlier life, and so did not believe. Poole answers with indignation, calling malice and prejudice unreasonable, since their very knowledge of his family should have forced the conclusion that he came by neither this wisdom nor these works by any human means. Henry puts the perversity in one line: they should have respected him the more because he was one of themselves, but therefore they despised him. The reply is a proverb built on the rare word ἄτιμος and the unit's pivot word πατρίς, and Pulpit notices the positive edge in the exceptive construction, that there will ever be some to honour him; he also offers Jeremiah 11:21 and 12:6 as a possible background. Then v. 58, where the commentators openly divide. Benson holds the power was not disarmed, only unexercised where few sick were brought. Barnes holds the miracles would have been useless to the purposes of the mission among men not in a condition to judge evidence. Gill says he would not, judging them unworthy, lest their condemnation be increased. Ellicott, reading Mark's stronger "could not," concludes that the wonder-working power was not absolute and unconditioned but depended on the faith of those who came. Pulpit locates the hindrance in the absence of moral conditions rather than of power, and notes the precise word: complete apistia, not the disciples' oligopistia. Every one of them insists, with Barnes and Gill from Mark 6:5, that a few sick folk were still healed.
⚙ This is the tool's own fallible reading, offered to be tested by Scripture. Matthew has just finished seven parables about a sowing that mostly fails, a field full of tares, a net that brings up bad fish, and about a kingdom hidden in things too small and too ordinary to look like a kingdom. He then puts down the parables and shows one. Nazareth is the rocky ground with a name and an address. The chapter's verdict, that seeing they do not see, is acted out by men who have seen most and known him longest, and who reason from the workshop to the impossibility of the workman. Notice what they get right: the wisdom is real, the powers are real, and their πόθεν is the correct question, the same question the servants ask about the tares in v. 27 of this chapter. Unbelief here is not ignorance of the evidence; it is possession of the evidence with an unwillingness to follow it home. And the closing verse cuts both ways against us. Against a triumphalism that treats power as automatic: he did not do many mighty works there. Against a fatalism that treats faith as the engine: he still healed a few. Matthew's διὰ with the accusative gives a reason, not a defeat. The FSSB does not claim to settle what Matthew's "did not" and Mark's "could not" together mean; Benson, Barnes, Gill, Ellicott and Pulpit give four different accounts of it, and the honest result is a boundary rather than a formula. What the text will bear is this: the God who took a carpenter's bench for thirty years does not force himself past a door that knows him and keeps him out. The line below is our own summary sentence, not Scripture.
They knew everything about him except him, and called that knowledge a reason.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
⚙ The opening clause is a formula, not a transition. The same pairing of ὅτε (G3753) with ἐτέλεσεν (teleō, G5055) closes the Sermon on the Mount at Matthew 7:28, the mission charge at Matthew 11:1, and the community discourse at Matthew 19:1. Pulpit names the formula here and cross-refers his own note at Matthew 11:1. The link to Matthew 19:1 is tighter still: the Verifier finds the verb μετῆρεν (metairō, G3332) in only two verses of the New Testament, this one and that, and Pulpit observes it comes there in the same connexion. All refs are within Matthew, so the verbal tier involves no cross-Testament claim.
Matthew 19:1 · Matthew 11:1 · Matthew 7:28
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G5055 teleō (in 28 vv) and G3753 hote (in 102 vv) across Matthew 7:28, 11:1, 19:1; plus the rare G3332 metairō (in only 2 vv, this verse and Matthew 19:1). Greek to Greek within one book, no quotation of another text claimed.
⚙ The unit turns twice on πατρίς (patris, G3968), a noun the Verifier finds in only eight New Testament verses, and this unit holds two of its occurrences (vv. 54, 57). The proverb built on it recurs at Mark 6:4, Luke 4:24 and John 4:44. Ellicott, Cambridge, JFB and Pulpit all set the Synoptic parallels side by side and dispute whether Luke narrates this same visit; Pulpit adds that in John 4:44 the word appears, following Westcott, in a special sense of Judaea, even though the saying there is almost identical with our v. 57. The rare lexeme and the near-identical saying make the verbal link secure; all four references are Greek, so no cross-Testament claim is involved.
Mark 6:4 · Mark 6:1 · Luke 4:24 · Luke 4:23 · John 4:44
basis: Verifier: shared rare Greek lexeme G3968 patris (in only 8 vv) at Mark 6:1, Mark 6:4, Luke 4:23, Luke 4:24, John 4:44, with G4396 prophētēs (in 138 vv) in the proverb itself; Greek to Greek.
⚙ The adjective Jesus applies to the prophet at home, ἄτιμος (atimos, G820), is rare: the Verifier finds it in four New Testament verses. Paul takes it up twice. At 1 Corinthians 4:10 he sets the apostles' dishonour against the Corinthians' honour; at 1 Corinthians 12:23 he argues that the members of the body reckoned less honourable are clothed with the greater honour. ⚙ Neither passage quotes this one and neither commentator in this unit draws the line; the connection recorded here is the shared rare lexeme and the shared logic that in the kingdom the un-honoured place is the characteristic place. Greek to Greek throughout.
1 Corinthians 4:10 · 1 Corinthians 12:23
basis: Verifier: shared rare Greek lexeme G820 atimos (in only 4 vv). Deliberately downgraded from verbal: the lexeme is genuinely rare, but Paul quotes nothing here and at 1 Corinthians 12:23 uses the word in another sense (the less presentable members of the body), so only the shared word and the shared pattern are claimed.
⚙ Inside Matthew 13 itself the interrogative πόθεν (pothen, G4159) is put into two mouths. At v. 27 the householder's servants ask whence the field has tares; at vv. 54 and 56 the townsmen ask whence this man has wisdom and powers. The Verifier confirms the shared lexeme along with the negative particle οὐχί (G3780) that heads the Nazarene questions. ⚙ This is a structural observation rather than a quotation: the chapter that began by explaining why the sowing fails ends by naming the field where it failed.
Matthew 13:27
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G4159 pothen (in 26 vv) and G3780 ouchi (in 51 vv) within Matthew 13. A genuine verbal recurrence, but tiered structural because no citation or proverb is being reused, only a motif.
⚙ ἀπιστία (apistia, G570) is not a common word: the Verifier finds it in eleven New Testament verses. Mark 6:6, the direct parallel, adds that Jesus marvelled because of it and went round the villages teaching, which Poole quotes in full. Hebrews 3:12 uses the same noun for the evil heart of unbelief that turns away from the living God, in an argument about the generation who heard and did not enter rest. ⚙ Hebrews does not cite Matthew and the settings differ; what is recorded here is the shared rare lexeme and the shared pattern of hearing without entering. Greek to Greek.
Mark 6:6 · Hebrews 3:12
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G570 apistia (in 11 vv) at Mark 6:6 and Hebrews 3:12, with G1321 didaskō (in 91 vv) shared with Mark 6:6. Tiered structural rather than verbal because Hebrews makes no citation of this passage and the lexeme carries different settings.
⚙ Hebrews 11:14 uses the same rare noun πατρίς (G3968) that governs this unit, but of the patriarchs who declare plainly that they seek a homeland. The Verifier records the shared lexeme. ⚙ The irony is the FSSB's own and is offered as a reading, not a demonstration: the one who has no honour in his patris is the one through whom a better patris is given to those who confess themselves strangers. Hebrews is not commenting on Matthew and no commentator in this unit makes the link, so nothing beyond the word and the inverted pattern is claimed.
Hebrews 11:14
basis: Verifier: shared rare Greek lexeme G3968 patris (in only 8 vv). Deliberately tiered structural, not verbal: the sense differs (native town versus heavenly homeland) and no quotation or allusion is claimed in either direction.
⚙ Pulpit suggests, at the words "and in his own house," that Jeremiah's experience may have given rise to the proverb: the men of Anathoth who sought his life (Jeremiah 11:21) and the brothers and father's house who dealt treacherously with him (Jeremiah 12:6). ⚙ The FSSB records this as a figural and possible reading only. This is a Greek to Hebrew pairing, so no shared Strong's lexeme can exist and no verbal tier is possible; Pulpit himself says "possibly," and the Gospel text neither quotes Jeremiah nor names him here.
Jeremiah 11:21 · Jeremiah 12:6
basis: Basis is Pulpit's own suggestion at Matthew 13:57 ("Possibly Jeremiah's experience ... gave rise to this proverb"), a pattern link only. Cross-Testament Greek to Hebrew, so shared Strong's numbers are impossible and no verbal claim is made. Widely-noted among commentators, but stated here as possible, not demonstrated.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ The crowd's sneer is the Gospel's best evidence for the reality of the incarnation. JFB draws the inference exactly: these particulars of our Lord's human history testify first to his true and real humanity, because during all his first thirty years his townsmen had discovered nothing about him different from other men; secondly to the divine character of his mission, since these very Nazarenes proclaim the unparalleled character of his teaching; and thirdly to his humility, in that he gave no indication of what he was for thirty years. Barnes pushes the same point through τέκτων: the Son of God spent the greatest part of his life in honest, useful, obscure industry, and it staggers the faith of many that he should. Benson calls it an additional proof of the humiliation of the blessed Redeemer for our sakes. ⚙ The workshop is not a gap before the ministry; it is the first long chapter of the self-emptying that Philippians 2:7 names, and Isaiah 53:2 had already denied the Servant any stately form or majesty that would draw men to him. ⚙ Neither text is quoted by Matthew here and no voice in this brief cites them; the link is the FSSB's own reading of a pattern the commentators describe without naming these verses.
Philippians 2:7 · Isaiah 53:2 · Mark 6:3
⚙ The unit is John 1:11 in narrative form, and the Greek presses it: the rejection happens in his πατρίς, his father-land, and reaches into his οἰκία, his household. Ellicott notes the proverb reads like a saying often on his lips, telling of a prolonged experience of unbelief in all its forms; Poole and Henry both mark the perversity that familiarity became the ground of contempt. Mark's fuller form, which JFB and Poole both cite, adds "among his own kin," and John 7:5 records that his own brothers did not believe in him. ⚙ Isaiah 53:3 had already named the pattern: despised and rejected of men. The one whom the servants of the parable would have asked the householder about is himself the man from nowhere that his own town cannot place.
John 1:11 · John 7:5 · Isaiah 53:3
⚙ This reading is the tool's own and is marked as such. Nazareth's whole argument is an argument from building: we know the trade, we know the family, therefore we know the man. Within Matthew's own book the answer comes eight chapters later, when Jesus takes Psalm 118:22 on his lips and names himself the stone the builders rejected, which became the head of the corner (Matthew 21:42), and 1 Peter 2:4 takes up the same figure of a stone rejected by men but chosen and precious with God. ⚙ No commentator in this unit draws the line from the τέκτων of 13:55 to the builders of 21:42, and the Greek words differ, so the connection claimed here is thematic and interpretive only: the craftsman's son is judged unfit by the builders of his own town, and is the one stone they cannot do without.
Matthew 21:42 · Psalm 118:22 · 1 Peter 2:4
⚙ The last verse guards two errors at once. Ellicott, reading Mark's stronger "could do no mighty works," concludes that the wonder-working power was not absolute and unconditioned but depended on the faith of those who came to him; Barnes replies that we are not to suppose his power was limited, only that men so prejudiced were not in a condition to judge evidence; Gill says he would not, judging them unworthy; Benson says he did not judge it proper to obtrude his miracles on people who brought him few sick. ⚙ The FSSB does not choose among these. What the Greek gives is διὰ with the accusative, a cause and not a conquest, and a negated πολλὰς rather than a negated verb: a few were still healed (Mark 6:5, cited here by Barnes, Gill, Poole and JFB). The Christ who is not honoured at home does not therefore stop healing; he stops proving.
Mark 6:5 · Matthew 11:6 · Hebrews 3:12
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
⚙ Text and translation. The base text is the BSB (CC0) with the Berean interlinear parse and Strong's numbers; the Greek surfaces, glosses and parsings above are sourced, not reconstructed. Two textual points recorded by the commentators bear on the reading: Pulpit judges that αὐτοῦ is not genuine with πατρίδι in v. 57, so that "his own country" should be simply "the country," and that the insertion of idia lacks sufficient authority; and Ellicott notes that manuscript authority favours "Joseph" over "Joses" in v. 55, with Pulpit adding that Joses is the Graecised form.
⚙ What is genuinely uncertain. First, the harmony. Cambridge, Ellicott, JFB and Pulpit disagree over whether Luke 4:16-30 records this visit or an earlier one, and Ellicott concedes that a dislocation of some kind must be admitted in any case. This synthesis takes no position. Second, the brothers and sisters. JFB lays out three views and declines to decide; Cambridge, Barnes, Benson and Pulpit each take a different one. The lexicon entry for ἀδελφός (G80) itself allows "near or remote," so the Greek does not settle it and neither do we. Third, v. 58. Matthew's "did not do" and Mark's "could not do" are harmonised four different ways by the commentators quoted here; the FSSB records the range and asserts none of them as the meaning.
⚙ What is machine synthesis. Every thread basis comes from the Verifier's computed shared-lexeme output, reproduced in the badges with frequencies. The Jeremiah thread is tiered typological because it is a cross-Testament pairing where shared Strong's numbers are impossible, and because Pulpit offers it as a possibility only. The Hebrews 11:14 and Matthew 13:27 threads are deliberately tiered structural though the shared lexemes are real: no quotation is being claimed in either direction. The third Christ entry (the rejected stone) is marked novel because no voice in this brief draws it and the Greek vocabulary differs; it is offered to be tested, not relied on. Gill's Antioch schoolmaster anecdote and his report of Epiphanius on the sisters' names are late tradition, flagged as such in the editorial notes and used for nothing.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)