At that time Herod the tetrarch heard the reports about Jesus
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
En ekeinō tō kairō Hērōdēs ho tetraarchēs ēkousen tēn akoēn Iēsou
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
The Beheading of John
Matthew 14:1–12 — The Beheading of John. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
At that time Herod the tetrarch heard the reports about Jesus
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
En ekeinō tō kairō Hērōdēs ho tetraarchēs ēkousen tēn akoēn Iēsou
and said to his servants, “This is John the Baptist; he has risen from the dead! That is why miraculous powers are at work in him.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai eipen tois autou paisin Houtos estin Iōannēs ho Baptistēs autos ēgerthē apo tōn nekrōn kai touto dia hai dynameis energousin en autō
Now Herod had arrested John and bound him and put him in prison on account of Herodias, his brother Philip’s wife,
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
gar Ho Hērōdēs kratēsas ton Iōanēn edēsen auton kai apetheto en phylakē dia Hērōdiada tēn autou tou adelphou Philippou gynaika
because John had been telling him, “It is not lawful for you to have her.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
gar Iōannēs elegen autō ho Ouk exestin soi echein autēn
Although Herod wanted to kill John, he was afraid of the people, because they regarded John as a prophet.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai thelōn apokteinai auton ephobēthē ton ochlon hoti eichon auton hōs prophētēn
On Herod’s birthday, however, the daughter of Herodias danced before them and pleased Herod
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
tou Hērōdou Genesiois genomenois de hē thygatēr tēs Hērōdiados ōrchēsato en tō mesō kai ēresen tō Hērōdē
so much that he promised with an oath to give to her whatever she asked.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
hothen hōmologēsen meth’ horkou dounai autē ho ean aitēsētai
Prompted by her mother, she said, “Give me here on a platter the head of John the Baptist.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de probibastheisa hypo autēs tēs mētros Hē phēsin Dos moi Hōde epi pinaki tēn kephalēn Iōannou tou Baptistou
The king was grieved, but because of his oaths and his guests, he ordered that her wish be granted
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai ho basileus lypētheis dia tous horkous kai tous synanakeimenous ekeleusen dothēnai
and sent to have John beheaded in the prison.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai pempsas ton Iōannēn apekephalisen en tē phylakē
John’s head was brought in on a platter and presented to the girl, who carried it to her mother.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai autou hē kephalē ēnechthē epi pinaki kai edothē tō korasiō kai ēnenken tē autēs mētri
Then John’s disciples came and took his body and buried it. And they went and informed Jesus.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai autou hoi mathētai proselthontes ēran to ptōma kai ethapsan auton kai elthontes apēngeilan tō Iēsou
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
Matthew dates the scene not by a year but by a καιρός, a fitted occasion, and Cambridge and JFB independently identify it: this is the season of the mission of the Twelve, when the kingdom's noise had grown loud enough to carry to Tiberias. The tetrarch "heard the hearing" of Jesus, a cognate pair the English flattens to "heard the reports." He never hears the Preacher; he hears only what is said. Ellicott is careful not to overread the delay, noting the words "do not necessarily imply that no tidings had reached him till now," and Barnes puts it down to a man "of much dissoluteness of morals" who "did not think it a matter worthy of much regard."
Then the verdict, spoken not from a throne but to his own παισίν, his household men rather than his slaves (Ellicott's point, and JFB's "counsellors or court-ministers"): This is John the Baptist; he himself was raised from the dead. The pronoun is emphatic, as Cambridge insists, "he himself, in his own person," and the verb is aorist passive, a divine passive with no named agent. A guilty conscience has constructed a resurrection. The commentators divide over whether the man was a Sadducee: Benson says he was, and gives us the unit's sharpest line, that "Sadducism staggers when conscience awakes"; Cambridge reads the same sentence as proof that he was not. Ellicott holds both together, finding that "the superstitious terror of a conscience stained with guilt is stronger than his scepticism as a Sadducee." JFB compresses the whole psychology: the murdered prophet "haunted his guilty breast like a specter." Pulpit adds a point of another kind, that Herod's theory is an oblique witness to the miracles themselves, since "Herod's utterance is not such as a forger would have imagined."
Verses 3 to 12 are a flashback, and Matthew tells it in procedure: κρατήσας, seized; ἔδησεν, bound; ἀπέθετο, put away. Pulpit lists the stages exactly, "capture, binding, imprisonment in a place where he was quite out of the way," and notes that the middle-voice verb for shelving a man is the same one the Greek Old Testament uses when Ahab puts Micaiah away (2 Chronicles 18:26). Ellicott and Cambridge both locate the cell at Machaerus from Josephus, Cambridge adding the detail that there "Antipas had a palace and a prison under one roof."
The cause is given twice, once as a woman's name and once as a sentence. John kept saying it, the imperfect refusing to stop: οὐκ ἔξεστίν σοι ἔχειν αὐτήν. Barnes names both crimes, adultery and incest, and grounds the second in Leviticus 18:16; Poole and Gill cite the same text; Gill works the case through in detail and concludes that Herod's sin was "very aggravated and complicated." Benson catches the register of the prophet's speech: "John's words were rough, like his raiment. He would not break the force of truth by using soft words even to a king." Gill adds that in this John "came in the spirit of Elijah," the comparison Ellicott has already made at verse 1, setting Herod and Herodias against Ahab and Jezebel.
Verse 5 then exposes the machinery of the man. He wills the killing (a present participle, a standing desire) and is made afraid of the crowd, who hold John as a prophet. Gill's gloss is the exact grammar of the verse: the fear was of "not God, but the multitude." Henry names the disease in one sentence: "Men fear being hanged for what they do not fear being damned for." Pulpit and Cambridge both note that Mark's fuller account reverses the pressure, with Herodias desiring John's death while Herod feared and protected him, and Pulpit judges the two accounts to be independent oral traditions from a common basis rather than copies. We record the tension and do not dissolve it.
The trap is a party. Γενεσίοις is plural, birthday ceremonies, and Gill records that the rabbinic list of "the feasts of idolaters" includes precisely "the birthday of kings"; Ellicott notes such feasts were the fashion of imperial Rome. The only other birthday feast in Scripture is Pharaoh's (Genesis 40:20), which also ended with a head taken off. The daughter of Herodias ὠρχήσατο ἐν τῷ μέσῳ, danced in the midst, and Ellicott insists on the preposition: "literally, in the midst of them, as they reclined on their couches indolently gazing." Barnes judges that "no modest woman would have appeared in this manner before the court"; Pulpit, that "such a dance with men sitting round would be specially abhorrent to the Jewish mind." Ellicott reads the mother's calculation without flinching: she "knew the tetrarch's weak point" and "sought to bend him to her will, even though it were by the sacrifice of her daughter's modesty."
The oath follows as water from a spring (ὅθεν, "whence"), and the verb Matthew chooses is ὡμολόγησεν, the New Testament's verb of confession. Barnes is blunt: "To please a wanton girl, the monarch called the eternal God to witness his willingness to give her half his kingdom." Gill calls it "a very foolish promise, and a rash oath." Poole states the rule that explains every remaining verse: "Those who have got over the point of lawfulness in an action, have nothing to consult but convenience."
Then the shove. προβιβασθεῖσα is passive and forceful; Cambridge corrects the older "instructed" to "impelled, instigated," and Pulpit notes that the word "implies that the girl herself would not have thought of it." She asks in the imperative and asks for here, on the spot, and Gill sees why: before the wine wears off. Benson measures the request against the offer, that "she demanded the holy Baptist's head, as of greater value to her than the half of the kingdom."
Verse 9 is where the man is finally weighed. He is grieved, but the participle is subordinate and the main verb is commanded. Barnes destroys the excuse: "No oath could justify a man in committing murder"; Poole reaches for the maxim that an oath cannot be a bond of iniquity. And both Barnes and Ellicott find the true cause not in the oath at all but in the couch: Barnes calls the guests "the strongest reason why Herod murdered John," and Ellicott names it "a false regard for public opinion." Pulpit adds the detail that damns the room: "Observe that these said nothing to stop him." Poole had seen it too, listing among the lessons of the scene "the genius of flattering courtiers, not one of them interposes to save the Baptist's life."
Matthew spends one verb on the death: ἀπεκεφάλισεν, and it is active and third singular, so that grammatically the king himself beheads John. Gill notes the killing was done in private, "without giving him a hearing, or allowing him to speak for himself." Against that brevity Ellicott sets the only estimate the New Testament will allow of this man, "intensity of purpose, dauntless courage, profound humility, self-denial carried to its highest point," and asks what elements of moral greatness could go beyond them. Benson asks the harder question and does not answer it: "How mysterious is the providence of God, which left the life of so holy a man in such infamous hands!"
Verse 11 is written almost entirely in passives, brought and given, with no agent named, until the one active verb, which belongs to a child. Matthew calls her κορασίῳ, a neuter diminutive, the little girl. Barnes: "What an offering to a woman!" Cambridge recalls the classical parallel of Fulvia piercing the tongue of the murdered Cicero, and Ellicott, who reports the legend of Salome's own beheading on the ice, immediately labels it "a tradition or legend" and sets against it the sober record of Josephus. Poole writes the epitaph: "Thus died this great man, to satisfy the malice and lust of a lewd and imperious woman; and to teach us what we must expect, it we will be faithful to the trust which God reposes in us."
The unit ends with two small motions of love. The disciples draw near and lift the πτῶμα, the fallen thing, and bury it, and Cambridge finds in Herod's permission "some proof of forbearance, if not of kindness." Then they go and report to Jesus. Ellicott believes the two whom John had sent from prison were among them; Benson thinks they "probably continued their attendance upon him"; Gill reads the whole act as a confession that their master had pointed them to the Messiah all along. Pulpit notes honestly that Mark attaches this same reporting clause to the returning Twelve and suspects a confusion in the underlying source. Matthew, whatever the source history, has built a chapter that begins with a rumor entering a palace and ends with the truth entering the presence of the Lord.
⚙ This is a fallible reading, offered to be tested by Scripture and by better readers. Matthew has arranged this unit around a single word: ἠγέρθη. Herod is the first person in this Gospel to say of a man that he was raised from the dead, and he says it about the wrong man, for the wrong reason, out of the wrong motive. His theology is not too small; it is too late. A conscience that will not repent will still manufacture doctrine, and what it manufactures will be a horror rather than a hope: a risen prophet loose in Galilee with unearthly powers, coming for him. That is the difference the Gospel keeps insisting on. The resurrection of Jesus is announced by angels to women who came to mourn; a counterfeit resurrection is announced by a murderer to his household at a moment when he cannot sleep.
The second thing the Greek presses is the arithmetic of fear. This man fears the crowd (verse 5), fears the taunt of his dinner guests (verse 9), and fears a ghost (verse 2). He fears everything except God, and so every fear he has becomes a lever in someone else's hand. Herodias found the lever and pulled it. Set beside him is a man in a chain whose only recorded speech in this unit is five words about what is not permitted, spoken in the imperfect tense, which means he never stopped saying them. One of these men is free.
And the last thing, which is where the unit turns outward: Matthew closes with the verb of the messenger. The disciples bury a corpse and then take the news to Jesus. That is all they do, and it is the only right thing done in twelve verses. The Gospel does not tell us what he said to them. It tells us that when the forerunner's voice was cut off, the men who had listened to it knew exactly whose door to go to, which is what a forerunner is for.
Herod's conscience preached a truer sermon than his court ever heard, and he answered it with a sword.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
Mark 6:17-29 is the sustained parallel, and the Verifier's bases are dense and unusually rare: Ἡρωδιάς (G2266) occurs in only six verses of the New Testament, πίναξ (G4094) in five, and both stand in Mark 6:22 and 6:28 against Matthew 14:3, 14:6, 14:8 and 14:11. Mark supplies what Matthew omits: the half of the kingdom (Mark 6:23, cited here by Gill, Ellicott and Poole), the girl's errand out of the room to her mother (Mark 6:24, noted by Ellicott and Barnes), the executioner (Mark 6:27, whose Latin title speculator Gill documents at length from Seneca and the rabbis), and the striking note that Herod feared John and heard him gladly (Mark 6:20, quoted by Poole and Ellicott). Pulpit judges the two accounts independent: "it is quite impossible to suppose that either evangelist had the words of the other in front of him," and calls them "two oral traditions starting from a common basis."
Mark 6:17 · Mark 6:22 · Mark 6:25 · Mark 6:27 · Mark 6:28
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes across a Greek to Greek parallel, including the rare G2266 Ἡρωδιάς (in 6 vv) at Mark 6:22 and 6:19, and the rare G4094 πίναξ (in 5 vv) at Mark 6:28, plus G2264 Ἡρώδης (40 vv), G910 Βαπτιστής (12 vv), G5438 φυλακή (45 vv), G2776 κεφαλή (67 vv). The rarity of πίναξ and Ἡρωδιάς carries the verbal tier; no claim is made that either evangelist copied the other.
τετράρχης (G5076) is one of the rarest office-words in the New Testament, occurring in four verses in all: here, Luke 3:19 (where the same Herod is reproved by John for Herodias and "for all the evils he had done," cited by Gill and Cambridge), Luke 9:7 (where the tetrarch hears and is perplexed, the passage Poole sets beside Matthew's), and Acts 13:1. That last is the sting. Among the prophets and teachers at Antioch is Manaen, named as the foster-brother of Herod the tetrarch. Ellicott, writing on verse 1, wonders aloud whether Manaen was among Herod's first informants about Jesus. The same rare word that labels the murderer in Matthew 14:1 labels, in Acts, the household that produced a man who laid hands on Barnabas and Saul. ⚙ The reading of that juxtaposition is ours; the lexical link is the Verifier's.
Luke 3:19 · Luke 9:7 · Acts 13:1
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G5076 τετράρχης (in 4 vv, one of the rarest office-titles in the New Testament) linking Matthew 14:1 to Luke 3:19, Luke 9:7 and Acts 13:1, with G2264 Ἡρώδης (40 vv) and G191 ἀκούω (398 vv) alongside. Greek to Greek; a real verbal link, not a quotation of one text by another.
ὀρχέομαι (G3738) occurs in four verses of the New Testament: Matthew 14:6, its Marcan parallel, and the twin sayings of Matthew 11:17 and Luke 7:32, where Jesus likens his generation to children in the marketplace calling out that they piped and no one danced, they mourned and no one wept. That saying is spoken directly about John the Baptist and his hearers, in the same chapter in which Matthew records that none born of women is greater than John. Two chapters later, in Matthew's own narrative order, the generation that would not dance to the pipe of the kingdom dances at a tetrarch's birthday, and the dance costs John his head. ⚙ The irony is our reading; the shared rare lexeme is the Verifier's recorded basis, and we claim no quotation of one passage by the other.
Matthew 11:17 · Luke 7:32
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G3738 ὀρχέομαι (in 4 vv, rare), linking Matthew 14:6 to Matthew 11:17 and Luke 7:32. Greek to Greek within one Testament. The lexical link is confirmed; the interpretive contrast drawn from it is ⚙ synthesis.
πίναξ (G4094), the serving dish twice named in this unit (verses 8 and 11), occurs in only five verses of the New Testament, and outside the Baptist's death its notable appearance is Luke 11:39, where the Lord tells the Pharisees that they cleanse the outside of the cup and of the platter while within they are full of robbery and wickedness. Cambridge defines the object precisely: "a flat wooden trencher" on which meat was served. ⚙ We do not claim Luke 11:39 alludes to Herod's feast or the reverse. We note only that Scripture uses this rare word for the one vessel whose clean outside and foul inside the Lord made a parable, and that in Matthew 14 a court with immaculate manners has a prophet's head carried in on one.
Luke 11:39
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G4094 πίναξ (in 5 vv, rare) between Matthew 14:8, 14:11 and Luke 11:39. The lexeme is rare enough to carry a verbal tier, but we deliberately under-claim: no quotation or allusion is asserted in either direction, only a shared object and a shared motif of a clean vessel and a foul content.
John's five words in verse 4 are not a private opinion. Barnes names the ground, that such marriages "were expressly forbidden, Leviticus 18:16"; Poole says Herod lived with her "contrary to the express law of God, Leviticus 18:16"; Gill cites the same verse and works out why the levirate provision does not cover the case, since Philip was living and there was issue. The Gospel does not quote Leviticus; it presupposes it. A prophet standing before a throne is doing nothing but reading the Torah aloud.
The link cannot be tiered verbal: Matthew is Greek and Leviticus is Hebrew, so no shared Strong's lexeme is available, and the Verifier offers none. The basis is the unanimous testimony of the sourced commentators that this is the statute in view, plus the substantive agreement of the prohibition with the charge.
Leviticus 18:16
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's numbers are impossible and no verbal tier can be claimed. Recorded basis: Barnes, Poole and Gill all independently identify Leviticus 18:16 as the statute behind οὐκ ἔξεστίν σοι ἔχειν αὐτήν, and the content of the prohibition matches the charge.
Ellicott makes the figure twice and without hedging: John had "the very spirit of Elijah in his dealings with Ahab and Jezebel," and at verse 5 he finds "a struggle of conscience against passion in the weak and wicked tetrarch, as there was in Ahab in his relations with Elijah. In Herodias, as in Jezebel, there was no halting between two opinions." Gill reaches the same conclusion from the other end, that John's reproof "made it manifest, that he came in the spirit of Elijah." The pattern is exact: a weak king who half respects the prophet, a queen who does not, a word about a marriage and a murder, and a prophet who must be hunted because he will not stop speaking.
This is a figural reading, not a verbal one, and it cannot be otherwise: Matthew is Greek, Kings is Hebrew. It is also ancient and widely held rather than novel, being the reading the Gospel itself invites wherever it calls John the Elijah who was to come.
1 Kings 19:2 · 1 Kings 21:20 · 1 Kings 21:25
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew): no shared Strong's lexeme is possible and none is claimed. The figural link is named explicitly in the sourced commentary (Ellicott at Matthew 14:1 and 14:5; Gill at 14:4), and is ancient and widely held rather than novel.
Matthew 11:11 and Matthew 14:2 share the name John, the epithet Βαπτιστής (G910, a word in only twelve verses) and the verb ἐγείρω (G1453). In 11:11 the Lord says that among those born of women none has arisen greater than John the Baptist; in 14:2 a murderer says that John the Baptist was raised from the dead. The verb is common (138 verses) and so cannot by itself carry a verbal tier; the joint presence of the rarer G910 is what makes the pair worth recording. ⚙ The reading we draw is that Matthew lets the same vocabulary be spoken once by the Lord in praise and once by a guilty man in terror, and that the Gospel's own resurrection announcement, when it comes, will use the passive that Herod here abused.
Matthew 11:11 · Matthew 28:6
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G910 Βαπτιστής (in 12 vv) and G1453 ἐγείρω (in 138 vv) with G2491 Ἰωάννης (132 vv) between Matthew 14:2 and Matthew 11:11. ἐγείρω is too common to justify a verbal tier on its own, so the pairing is recorded as thematic; the reference to Matthew 28:6 is ⚙ canonical comparison, not a Verifier-computed base.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ Read the shape of verses 3 to 12 and it is the shape of the Passion in miniature: a righteous man is seized, bound, put away; a ruler examines him and finds him just; that ruler would rather release him but fears the crowd and fears his peers; a public occasion forces the ruler's hand; he yields against his own conscience; the body is asked for by disciples and laid in a grave. Matthew narrates John's end in the same order in which he will narrate his Lord's. The commentators feel the parallel without naming it a type: Cambridge finds Herod "a type of the worst of tyrants"; Ellicott finds in verse 9 a man ruled by "a false regard for public opinion," which is precisely Pilate's disease; Barnes finds the same failure of nerve, a ruler "afraid of the charge of cowardice."
The Lord himself makes the connection explicit elsewhere in Matthew, teaching that Elijah has already come and they did to him whatever they wished, and that so also the Son of Man is about to suffer at their hands (Matthew 17:12). That sentence is the warrant for this whole reading, and it is his, not ours. The forerunner runs before, and the road he runs down ends at a grave that other men have to dig for him.
Matthew 17:12 · Matthew 27:57
⚙ Herod's sentence in verse 2 is formally orthodox and materially false. ἠγέρθη ἀπὸ τῶν νεκρῶν is the Gospel's own resurrection formula, an aorist passive whose unnamed agent is God, and it is the first time in Matthew that anyone applies it to a human being. The man who applies it is the man who cut the head off. JFB describes the effect exactly: the murdered prophet "haunted his guilty breast like a specter and seemed to him alive again and clothed with unearthly powers in the person of Jesus." Ellicott says the tetrarch meant something stronger than a ghost or a transmigration: "It was nothing less than John himself."
What this does in the Gospel's argument is set two resurrections side by side. One is a terror invented by a conscience that will not repent, and it makes its author more afraid, not more free. The other is announced at an empty tomb with the words "he is not here, for he has risen," and it makes cowards into witnesses. Herod's is a resurrection without repentance, which is exactly what judgment will be for those who want no other kind. We mark the observation as novel in its verbal form, though the moral substance, that a guilty conscience produces its own hell, is Henry's and Ellicott's before it is ours.
Matthew 14:2 · Matthew 28:6 · Matthew 16:21
Henry draws the conclusion the last verse asks for: "When the under shepherds are smitten, the sheep need not be scattered while they have the Great Shepherd to go to." That is the whole meaning of the report in verse 12. John's disciples do not disband and do not avenge; they bury their master and walk to Jesus. Ellicott believes the two whom John had sent from prison were among them, and traces the rest of the movement into Acts, where Apollos and the disciples at Ephesus still carry John's baptism. Gill reads their coming as the proof that John had taught them to expect the Messiah, and Benson thinks they "probably continued their attendance upon him."
⚙ And the pattern reaches further than this chapter. The smiting of the shepherd and the scattering of the sheep is a prophetic word the Lord will take on his own lips on the night he is betrayed (Matthew 26:31, citing Zechariah 13:7). Here the under-shepherd is struck and the sheep are not scattered, because the Great Shepherd is standing a day's walk away and they know it. Later the Shepherd himself will be struck and the sheep will scatter, and he will gather them again himself. The attestation is ancient in substance (Henry states it, and the Zechariah citation is the Lord's own), though the arrangement of the two scenes against each other is ours.
Matthew 26:31 · Zechariah 13:7 · Acts 19:3
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text. Greek interlinear, glosses, Strong's numbers and parses are the Berean data supplied in the brief; the English base text is the BSB. At verse 3 the interlinear gives the name as Ἰωάνην with a single nu, against Ἰωάννης elsewhere in the unit; that is an orthographic variant in the underlying text, not a different person, and no argument here rests on it. Three verses carry gloss placeholders in the source data (the "vvv" and ". . ." markers at 14:4 word 5, 14:6 words 3, 11, 12, and 14:9 word 8); the literal renderings above follow the Greek words and parses, not the placeholders.
What comes from outside Scripture. A good deal of what readers think they know about this chapter is Josephus, not Matthew. The prison at Machaerus (Ellicott, Cambridge, Gill, all citing Antiquities xviii), the name Salome for the dancing girl (Ellicott, Gill, Barnes, all from Josephus), Herod's later banishment to Lugdunum, and the political motive Josephus gives for the arrest (fear of sedition rather than the reproof of the marriage) are all extra-biblical. Gill notes the divergence of motive plainly and prefers the Gospel's account; Ellicott reports the Josephan version without harmonizing it. The story that Salome died when ice severed her head is traced by both Gill and Benson to Nicephorus, a late source, and Ellicott labels it "a tradition or legend." Jerome's account of Herodias piercing the tongue (Benson, Gill) is likewise patristic tradition, not Scripture. None of it is treated here as fact.
Real unresolved difficulties. (1) The identity of "Philip": Pulpit records that Josephus names Herodias' first husband simply "Herod," and that critics including Ewald and Schurer therefore suppose Matthew and Mark confused Herodias with her daughter; Pulpit answers the objection but does not pretend it vanishes. (2) Herod's theological party: Benson takes him for a Sadducee and reads verse 2 as conscience overriding his creed; Cambridge reads the same verse as proof he was not a Sadducee. Both are printed above, with an editorial note, and we do not adjudicate. (3) Who said "John is risen": Luke 9:7-9 has the report circulating among others and Herod doubtful; Matthew and Mark have Herod asserting it. Poole, Pulpit and Barnes each attempt a reconciliation, and Pulpit's is candid that the difference is real. (4) The final clause of verse 12: Pulpit observes that in Mark 6:30 the same reporting language belongs to the returning Twelve, and suspects "some confusion had arisen in the source before St Matthew used it." (5) The location of the feast: if the killing was at Machaerus and the banquet in Tiberias, verse 8's "here" is a problem; Pulpit sets out the difficulty and leaves it open.
Voices. Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary treats 14:1 to 14:12 as a single block, so the same text is attached to every verse in the source; his two excerpts here are therefore written over the whole unit, not over the verses where they appear. JFB's note on verse 2 is likewise repeated across verses 3 to 11 in the source data, and his fuller exposition of this material is referred out to Mark 6:17-29 and is not in the brief. Several Geneva entries in this unit are the verse text only, with no gloss; only the genuinely annotated Geneva notes have been used. Ten distinct commentators are cited across the twelve verses.
What is ⚙ and therefore fallible. Every observation marked ⚙, every tier judgment, the sola reading and the pullquote, and the christological readings above are machine synthesis offered to be tested. Where a rare shared lexeme could have carried a verbal tier and the interpretive point was ours rather than the text's, we have deliberately tiered down (see the πίναξ thread). No cross-Testament link in this unit is tiered verbal, because Greek and Hebrew share no Strong's numbers and any such claim would be false on its face.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)