Jesus called the crowd to Him and said, “Listen and understand.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai proskalesamenos ton ochlon eipen autois Akouete kai syniete
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
What Defiles a Man
Matthew 15:10–20 — What Defiles a Man. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
Jesus called the crowd to Him and said, “Listen and understand.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai proskalesamenos ton ochlon eipen autois Akouete kai syniete
A man is not defiled by what enters his mouth, but by what comes out of it.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
ton anthrōpon koinoi ou to eiserchomenon eis to stoma alla touto koinoi ton anthrōpon to ekporeuomenon ek tou stomatos
Then the disciples came to Him and said, “Are You aware that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this?”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Tote hoi mathētai proselthontes autō legousin Oidas hoti hoi Pharisaioi eskandalisthēsan akousantes ton logon
But Jesus replied, “Every plant that My heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by its roots.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de Ho apokritheis eipen Pasa phyteia hēn mou ho ouranios ho Patēr ouk ephyteusen ekrizōthēsetai
Disregard them! They are blind guides. If a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
aphete autous eisin typhloi hodēgoi typhlōn de ean typhlos hodēgē typhlon amphoteroi pesountai eis bothynon
Peter said to Him, “Explain this parable to us.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de ho Petros Apokritheis eipen autō Phrason tautēn tēn parabolēn hēmin
“Do you still not understand?” Jesus asked.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
este hymeis kai Akmēn asynetoi de Ho eipen
“Do you not yet realize that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then is eliminated?
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
ou noeite hoti pan to eisporeuomenon eis to stoma chōrei eis tēn koilian kai ekballetai eis aphedrōna
But the things that come out of the mouth come from the heart, and these things defile a man.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de ta ekporeuomena ek tou stomatos exerchetai ek tēs kardias kakeina koinoi ton anthrōpon
For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, and slander.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
gar ek tēs kardias exerchontai ponēroi dialogismoi phonoi moicheiai porneiai klopai pseudomartyriai blasphēmiai
These are what defile a man, but eating with unwashed hands does not defile him.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
tauta estin ta koinounta ton anthrōpon de to phagein aniptois chersin ou koinoi ton anthrōpon
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
⚙ The unit opens with an act before it opens with a word. προσκαλεσάμενος is an aorist middle participle: Jesus calls the crowd to Himself. Ellicott reads the gesture as the argument and says the act was more startling than appears on the surface, since Jesus appealed to no great name and no higher tribunal but removed the case to another court, the unperverted conscience of the common people. Gill fills in the physical picture from the other side: the crowd had withdrawn and stood at a distance out of veneration for the teachers, who would not have them near. Cambridge draws the ecclesiology: this appeal to the multitude as worthier than the Pharisees to receive divine truths is significant of the popular character of the Kingdom of heaven. Then two present imperatives, Ἀκούετε and συνίετε, keep on hearing and keep on putting together. Benson presses the second one hard and honestly: since the whole multitude is told to understand, in our Lord's judgment the whole multitude was capable of understanding the very thing the Pharisees did not. Gill adds the mechanics, that to hear with the outward ear is of no service unless what is heard is understood, and that the way to understand is to hear.
⚙ The Greek fronts τὸν ἄνθρωπον, the man, before any food is mentioned, and repeats κοινοῖ three times. Cambridge gives the literal sense, maketh common, and Pulpit sets the verb against ἁγιάζειν, to set apart for God, so that to be made common is to be pulled out of holy use; ethically applied, Pulpit says, it signifies to contract guilt. Two balanced neuter participles do the rest: the-thing-entering and the-thing-going-out. Barnes reduces it to the moral agent, the man, the soul, which could not be polluted by anything that was eaten. Poole is the most careful of the voices here: he denies that Jesus is speaking of Levitical pollution at all, and grants that one who ate an unclean thing might indeed be defiled by it, yet insists that even then it was not the flesh of the unclean bird or beast that defiled the man, but his sinful lusting after it and eating it in disobedience to the command of God. Ellicott goes much further and says the principle swept away the whole Levitical system of ceremonial purity, while Pulpit refuses that reading and says only that Christ prepared the way for its supersession and made no sudden and violent change. We record the disagreement; the brief does not settle it. What both sides see is the aftershock: Ellicott observes that even after Pentecost Peter still boasted he had never eaten anything common or unclean (Acts 10:14), which is the same word.
⚙ Three Greek words govern this movement, and each is stronger than its English. ἐσκανδαλίσθησαν is aorist passive from σκανδαλίζω, to set a trap: the Pharisees were not merely offended, they were snared, and what tripped them was a sentence. Poole says nothing offends hypocrites more than pressing spiritual worship and slighting external rites; Barnes says they were so zealous of their traditions that they could not endure that their absurdities should be exposed; Cambridge reads the disciples' anxiety as a proof of Pharisaic influence, since they believed Christ would be concerned to have offended those who stood so high in popular favour. Then φυτεία, a New Testament hapax which Cambridge notes the Septuagint uses of the vine, the most carefully cultivated plant, and which Benson and Pulpit alike render plantation rather than plant: a whole set-out growth, not one shoot. Its fate is the future passive ἐκριζωθήσεται, it shall be rooted out, agent unnamed. JFB names the Husbandman anyway from John 15:1 and generalizes, whatsoever is not of the planting of My heavenly Father shall share the same fate; Pulpit narrows it, insisting this is not the last day and not any forcible destruction by human agency but a system passing away to make room for the gospel; Gill splits the referent, doctrines on one side and persons on the other, and reserves for the Father real plants that shall never be plucked up. Last, ἄφετε, the aorist imperative of the releasing verb: let them go. Poole hears Hosea 4:17 in it, Ephraim is joined to idols, let him alone, while Benson hears pastoral freedom, neither court their favour nor dread their displeasure, and Barnes warns that it cannot mean leaving their error unrefuted, since Jesus is at that moment refuting it. Then four occurrences of τυφλός and a root repeated as noun and verb, ὁδηγοί and ὁδηγῇ. Ellicott shows from Romans 2:19 that guide of the blind was the rabbi's own name for his calling, so the title is handed back inverted; Pulpit notices the word order, blind blind if he lead. And ἀμφότεροι, both, closes the escape: Benson says the guides and the guided shall perish together, and the sin of the deceivers is no security to the deceived.
⚙ Peter asks for a παραβολή to be made plain, and the word itself is the confession: Barnes notes it can mean a dark or obscure saying (Psalm 78:2), and Poole that the Hebrews called all dark sayings parables. The plainest sentence in the chapter had become a riddle, because, as Pulpit says, inveterate prejudices die hard. Jesus' reply turns v. 10's command into an accusation with one word: ἀσύνετοί is the alpha-privative of the very verb συνίημι they were told to exercise. Ellicott catches the emphatic pronoun, ye, My disciples, are ye too like the Pharisees; JFB hears grief rather than temper, since slowness of apprehension in His genuine disciples grieves the Saviour; Poole supplies the measure, that God expects proficiency proportionate to the means He gives. Then the argument itself, built on three physical verbs: χωρεῖ, to be given room, ἐκβάλλεται, to be thrown out, and the rare noun ἀφεδρῶνα, the latrine, which BSB declines to render at all. Ellicott states the principle: a process purely physical from first to last cannot in itself bring moral defilement, though the appetites attached to it may, and those appetites were there before the food, among the things that come out of the heart. Against that stands καρδίας, the heart, the genitive of source, and a doubled exit, the participle ἐκπορευόμενα with the indicative ἐξέρχεται. Pulpit defines the noun at full stretch: the heart stands for soul, mind, spirit, will, the whole inner man. Gill makes it a watercourse, the corrupt fountain from which all moral defilement flows and sinful words and actions the impure streams. Then the catalogue, every item plural. Cambridge and Pulpit both see the second table of the Decalogue in the order; JFB glosses διαλογισμοὶ as evil reasonings and points them at the very tradition-building that started this argument, adding that the first shape evil takes when it stirs is reasonings about suggested actions; Ellicott traces an ascent from the trains of thought that are the first suggestions of evil to the βλασφημίαι that have God for their object, and hears in that end point the Pharisees of Matthew 12:24. The unit closes where it began, with unwashed hands, and JFB is right that this is how our Lord sums up the whole searching discourse. Gill will not leave it at diagnosis: nothing short of the blood of Christ can cleanse what this list has exposed.
⚙ Offered to be tested. The hinge of this unit is a single Greek verb used five times, κοινόω, to make common. Not to dirty. To de-consecrate. Pulpit's gloss, that it stands opposed to ἁγιάζειν, to set apart for God, is the key that fits the whole passage, and it reframes the question the Pharisees thought they were asking. They asked what substances carry contagion. Jesus answers a different question: what actually takes a human being out of holy use. And His answer is that nothing which is merely given room in the body (χωρεῖ) and then thrown out (ἐκβάλλεται) into the sewer (ἀφεδρῶνα) can reach that far in. The mouth appears twice in v. 11 and twice more in vv. 17 and 18, and the two appearances mean two different things, as Pulpit saw: an intake valve, and the organ of the heart. Traffic in one direction is digestion. Traffic in the other direction is disclosure.
⚙ What we think the unit is doing, and offer for correction, is this: it does not make the heart worse than the law said, it makes the heart the only place the law was ever aimed. The seven items of v. 19 are not a list of unusually bad people; they are the second table of the Decalogue read backwards, from act to source, as Cambridge and Pulpit both observe. And the sequence is exact, διαλογισμοὶ πονηροί first: evil reasonings, JFB's rendering, the deliberations that talk a sin into plausibility before it is ever done. JFB's further observation is the sharpest thing in this brief: those very reasonings are what built the tradition that nullified the moral law. So the Pharisees' hedge and the murderer's plan come out of one faculty. That is why the unit puts the offence of v. 12 and the catalogue of v. 19 in the same paragraph, and why the plantation the Father did not plant is uprooted in between them.
⚙ And then the honest difficulty, which we do not think this unit closes. Jesus diagnoses; He does not here prescribe. The passage names the fountain and says nothing about cleaning it. If the heart is the source, no washing that begins at the hands can reach it, and the unit offers no substitute ritual. Gill supplies what the text withholds, that nothing short of the blood of Christ can cleanse from this pollution, and Henry, that Christ teaches men to humble themselves and to seek to be cleansed in the Fountain opened for sin and uncleanness. We judge that reading correct but we note that it is a reading, drawn from elsewhere in Scripture and not from these eleven verses, which end, with deliberate anticlimax, on unwashed hands.
Not to dirty, but to de-consecrate: the question is not what touches a man, but what takes him out of holy use.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
⚙ Mark 7:14 to 23 carries this discourse with, as Poole says, very small difference in words, only specifying more sins than Matthew enumerates. The Verifier confirms the link at the level of vocabulary rather than theme: ἐκπορεύομαι (G1607), εἰσπορεύομαι (G1531), κοινόω (G2840) and ἄνιπτος (G449) all recur, and the decisive one is ἀφεδρών (G856), the latrine, which occurs in only two verses of the whole New Testament: Matthew 15:17 and Mark 7:19. Several commentators read Matthew through Mark at just these points: Barnes and JFB both cite Mark's added clause, if any man have ears to hear, let him hear; Ellicott calls Mark's further words, purging all meats, somewhat perplexing; Gill uses Mark's phrase entereth not into the heart to carry Matthew's argument.
Mark 7:15 · Mark 7:18 · Mark 7:19 · Mark 7:20 · Mark 7:21 · Mark 7:23 · Mark 7:2
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G856 ἀφεδρών (in 2 vv, the rarest possible link), G449 ἄνιπτος (in 2 vv), G2840 κοινόω (in 11 vv), G1531 εἰσπορεύομαι (in 18 vv), G1607 ἐκπορεύομαι (in 33 vv). Both refs are Greek New Testament, so shared Strong's numbers are a legitimate verbal basis; this is Gospel parallel, not quotation of one by the other
⚙ The same saying stands in Luke 6:39, and Cambridge notes plainly that the proverb is quoted there in a different connection, as part of the Sermon on the Plain. The verbal overlap is tight and rare. Pulpit treats the saying as proverbial in the wider world too, citing Horace and a Greek adage, and Ellicott judges the proverb probably familiar but says that, as now spoken, it had the character of a prophecy. The βόθυνος also links this verse to Matthew 12:11, where a sheep falls into a pit on the Sabbath, another argument in which Jesus sets a plain fact of ordinary life against a rule of the teachers.
Luke 6:39 · Matthew 12:11
basis: Verifier: Luke 6:39 shares G999 βόθυνος (in 3 vv, rare), G3594 ὁδηγέω (in 5 vv, rare) and G297 ἀμφότερος (in 14 vv); Matthew 12:11 shares G999 βόθυνος (in 3 vv). Greek to Greek, so shared Strong's numbers are a valid verbal basis; Cambridge confirms the saying stands in both places
⚙ κοινόω (G2840) occurs in only eleven verses of the New Testament, and a cluster of them are Peter's. Ellicott presses the irony: even after Pentecost, Peter still boasted that he had never eaten anything common or unclean (Acts 10:14), and Cambridge glosses the verb here by that same phrase. The voice from heaven in Acts 10:15 and 11:9 answers Peter with the verb Jesus used in his hearing: what God has cleansed, do not you make common. Acts 21:28 shows the charge turned into an accusation against Paul, that he has made the holy place common. The Verifier records the link as lexical; the biographical irony is ours and Ellicott's.
Acts 10:15 · Acts 11:9 · Acts 21:28
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G2840 κοινόω (in 11 vv), appearing three times in each of Acts 10:15, 11:9 and 21:28 as well as five times in this unit. All refs are Greek New Testament, so the shared Strong's number is a legitimate verbal basis; no citation of Matthew is claimed
⚙ ψευδομαρτυρία (G5577) occurs in only two verses of Scripture. One is this list of what comes out of the heart and defiles a man. The other is Matthew 26:59, where the chief priests and the whole council seek false testimony against Jesus in order to put Him to death. Barnes describes the sin from the inside, concealing the truth or stating what we know to be false, proceeding from a desire to injure others. Gill defines it as swearing falsely to the hurt of a neighbour's name, person or estate. ⚙ Neither commentator draws the line to the trial; we draw it and mark it as ours. The Verifier confirms only the lexical rarity, and the same Gospel is the source of both verses.
Matthew 26:59
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G5577 ψευδομαρτυρία (in 2 vv, the rarest possible link, and both within Matthew). Greek to Greek, so shared Strong's numbers are a valid verbal basis; the theological connection drawn in the body is machine synthesis and is marked as such
⚙ Two of the unit's key words meet again in Romans 1:21, where Paul says the nations became vain in their διαλογισμοῖς and their καρδία was darkened, using ἀσύνετος in the same context. ἀσύνετος is rare, in five verses, and stands in this unit at v. 16, where the disciples are called it. Cambridge sends the reader instead to the spiritual understanding of Colossians 1:9 and the knowledge in the mystery of Christ of Ephesians 3:4. JFB's gloss of διαλογισμοί as evil reasonings makes the overlap substantive rather than incidental, since Paul is describing the same faculty going wrong.
Romans 1:21
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G801 ἀσύνετος (in 5 vv, rare), G1261 διαλογισμός (in 14 vv) and G2588 καρδία (in 149 vv). The rarity of ἀσύνετος would formally admit a verbal tier Greek to Greek, but we under-claim deliberately: Paul neither cites nor echoes this discourse, and no commentator in the brief connects the two, so the recorded basis is a shared anthropology carried in shared vocabulary
⚙ Cambridge supplies the lexical bridge: φυτεία occurs here only in the New Testament, and the Septuagint uses it of the vine, the most carefully cultivated plant, at 2 Kings 19:29, Ezekiel 17:7 and Micah 1:6. Pulpit calls the comparison of men and trees, plant and doctrine, a common biblical metaphor and cites Psalm 1 and Isaiah 5:7, then quotes Jeremiah 2:21, I had planted thee a noble vine, wholly a right seed, how then art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine unto me. Benson uses the same verse of the Jewish people. Isaiah 60:21 gives the positive counterpart, the branch of the Lord's planting, which is Gill's picture of the plants the Father does plant and which shall never be rooted up. ⚙ Because these are Hebrew texts and this is Greek, no shared Strong's number can be claimed, and none is: the link is a shared figure, carried in part through the Septuagint's use of this very noun.
Isaiah 5:1-7 · Isaiah 60:21 · Psalm 1:3 · Jeremiah 2:21 · Ezekiel 17:7
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's numbers are impossible and no verbal tier is claimed. Basis is a shared planting and uprooting figure, attested by Cambridge (φυτεία used in the LXX of the vine at 2 Kings 19:29, Ezekiel 17:7, Micah 1:6) and by Pulpit, who cites Psalm 1, Isaiah 5:7 and quotes Jeremiah 2:21
⚙ Benson quotes Isaiah 9:16 directly against this verse: though the leaders of the people cause them to err, yet they that are led of them are destroyed. Gill points to Isaiah 42:19, who is blind but my servant, and reports an old Jewish tradition of blind teachers at the time when God should have His tabernacle among them. Isaiah 56:10 gives the watchmen who are blind. Pulpit adds a lexical observation that strengthens the figure without turning it into a quotation: βόθυνος is the Septuagint's word for the Hebrew pachath, the pit in which wild animals are taken, at Isaiah 24:17, 18. ⚙ That is a translation-level contact, not a shared Strong's number, so the tier stays structural.
Isaiah 9:16 · Isaiah 56:10 · Isaiah 42:19 · Isaiah 24:17-18
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's numbers are unavailable and no verbal tier is claimed. Basis is the prophetic motif of blind leaders, cited by Benson (Isaiah 9:16) and Gill (Isaiah 42:19), plus Pulpit's note that the LXX renders Hebrew pachath by βόθυνος at Isaiah 24:17, 18
⚙ Henry states the basis for this thread and states it as Scripture: it is the heart that is desperately wicked, Jeremiah 17:9, for there is no sin in word or deed which was not first in the heart. Pulpit ends his note on v. 19 with Proverbs 4:23, keep thy heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of life, and with the prayer of Psalm 51:10. Genesis 6:5 supplies the root form of the same diagnosis, every imagination of the thoughts of his heart only evil continually, which sits very close to JFB's evil reasonings. ⚙ The unit is therefore not introducing a new anthropology but naming an old one and locating ceremonial washing outside its reach.
Jeremiah 17:9 · Proverbs 4:23 · Genesis 6:5 · Psalm 51:10
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's numbers cannot be cited and no verbal tier is claimed. Basis is a shared doctrine of the heart as the source of sin, adduced here by Henry (Jeremiah 17:9) and Pulpit (Proverbs 4:23, Psalm 51:10)
⚙ The Verifier pairs v. 13 with Luke 17:6 on two genuinely uncommon verbs, φυτεύω (G5452) and ἐκριζόω (G1610). The vocabulary overlap is real and we record it, but the sense runs the other way: in Luke the uprooting is what faith the size of a mustard seed could command of a sycamine tree, not a judgment on a plantation the Father never planted. No commentator in this brief draws the connection. ⚙ We therefore flag it rather than assert it: a reader may verify the lexemes and judge for themselves whether anything more than shared agricultural vocabulary is present. We think probably not.
Luke 17:6
basis: Verifier reports shared Greek lexemes G5452 φυτεύω (in 11 vv) and G1610 ἐκριζόω (in 4 vv), which would formally support a verbal tier Greek to Greek. We decline it: the two contexts use the words to opposite ends and no commentator in the brief connects them, so the link is flagged as lexical coincidence pending verification
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ JFB makes the identification explicitly in the brief, naming the Father of v. 13 as the great Husbandman of John 15:1, and drawing the general rule that whatsoever is not of His planting shall share the plantation's fate. That reading has teeth, because the Old Testament figure it grows out of is a vine that failed: Isaiah's vineyard yielding wild grapes, Jeremiah's noble vine turned degenerate, which Pulpit quotes here. Cambridge notes that the Septuagint uses this very noun φυτεία of the vine. The redemptive-historical motion is therefore from a planting that must be rooted out to a planting that cannot be, and the second is a person: I am the true vine, and My Father is the husbandman. Gill, without leaving Matthew, already describes the Father's real plants as those planted in the likeness of Christ's death and resurrection and grafted into Christ. ⚙ That is why the uprooting of v. 13 is not simply destructive: what is cleared is cleared for a growth the Father did plant.
John 15:1 · Isaiah 5:1-7 · Jeremiah 2:21 · Isaiah 60:21
⚙ This unit diagnoses without prescribing, and both Henry and Gill feel the gap and fill it from the rest of Scripture. Henry: when Christ teaches, He will show men the deceitfulness and wickedness of their own hearts, He will teach them to humble themselves, and to seek to be cleansed in the Fountain opened for sin and uncleanness, which is Zechariah 13:1. Gill, on v. 20: it is only the blood of Christ can cleanse them from the pollution and guilt of them. The logic is the passage's own. If κοινόω means to be taken out of holy use, and the agent is καρδία, then washing that starts at the hands is the wrong instrument at the wrong depth, and what is needed is a cleansing that reaches the conscience. Hebrews 9:13 to 14 argues in exactly those terms, setting the ashes that sanctify the flesh against the blood of Christ that purges the conscience, and Ezekiel 36:26 promises the organ itself replaced. ⚙ Jesus does not say this here. He says it by saying nothing else, and by ending the discourse on unwashed hands.
Zechariah 13:1 · Hebrews 9:13-14 · Ezekiel 36:26 · Titus 1:15
⚙ Ellicott brings John 9:41 into v. 14: the worst of the Pharisees' blindness was that it was self-chosen and they boasted that they saw. That is the hinge of the christological reading. In the same chapter of John, the one who gave sight to a blind man says that He came into the world for judgment, that those who do not see might see and those who see might become blind. Gill sends the reader to Isaiah 42:19 for blind servants; the same prophet's servant is the one sent to open blind eyes. So v. 14's verdict on ὁδηγοί, way-leaders, is not merely negative: a blind guide is condemned because a true one exists, and the unit's own frame has Him calling a crowd to Himself and telling them to hear and understand. ⚙ The one who says let them go is the one who is Himself the way.
John 9:39-41 · Isaiah 42:6-7 · Romans 2:19 · Matthew 15:10
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text: BSB (CC0) with the Berean interlinear and Strong's numbers, Greek, eleven verses, Matthew 15:10 to 20. Two words in the unit are effectively unrendered in the BSB line: ἀφεδρῶνα (G856) at 15:17, the latrine, where BSB stops at “is eliminated,” and τυφλῶν (G5185) at 15:14, the genitive “of blind ones.” Our literal renderings restore both, and the divergence notes say where they were lost.
Voices: ten public-domain commentators are present in the brief and all ten are quoted here. Matthew Henry's entry is a single block on 15:10 to 20 repeated at each verse rather than a per-verse comment, so it is cited once; Poole's notes on several verses are cross-references to his own comments elsewhere in the chapter, which limits what can be quoted from him at 15:10, 15:13, 15:17, 15:18 and 15:19; Geneva's entries at most verses are the bare verse text with no gloss, so Geneva is quoted only where a real note exists, at 15:10. Two Pulpit quotations of secondary authors are recorded in his own words and remain his: Philo on the mouth, and Fillion's distinction between the physical and the moral mouth. Gill's two rabbinic citations (Tzeror Hammor, Zohar) are reported by him; we have not verified them.
Uncertain, and left uncertain: whether this saying abrogates the Levitical food law or only prepares its supersession. Ellicott says the principle swept away the whole Levitical system of ceremonial purity; Pulpit explicitly denies that Christ here abrogated it; Poole grants that Levitical defilement was real while locating the pollution in the disobedience rather than the flesh. The brief does not settle this and neither do we. Also left open: whether φυτεία in v. 13 refers to doctrines, to persons, or to both. Gill allows both, Cambridge says the doctrine of the Pharisees, Benson extends it to the Jewish people as a whole, and that last extension is Benson's and not the verse's.
Machine layer: every paragraph marked ⚙ is fallible synthesis and is offered to be tested, in particular the link from 15:19 to the false testimony of Matthew 26:59, which no commentator in the brief draws, and our judgment that the Luke 17:6 lexical pair is coincidence. One thread is deliberately downgraded to flagged for that reason. No formula quotation of the Old Testament appears in the BSB text of this unit, and no cross-Testament thread here is tiered verbal.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)