AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
Mark's telling of the same three days: the two rarest words in the unit verbal / quotation: confirmed
Mark 8:1 to 10 is the parallel narrative, and JFB and Poole both simply refer the reader there instead of expounding Matthew. The Verifier makes the overlap measurable rather than impressionistic: Mark 8:3 shares with Matthew 15:32 the two rarest lexemes in this unit, νῆστις (G3523, fasting, present in only two verses of the Greek New Testament) and ἐκλύω (G1590, to be unstrung, in five), along with ὁδός (G3598, the road). Two two-verse and five-verse lexemes in one sentence is verbal contact, not coincidence; it is a Synoptic parallel within Greek, so no quotation of Scripture is being claimed, only that the two evangelists record the same words.
Mark 8:3 · Mark 8:8 · Mark 8:7
basis: Verifier: Matthew 15:32 and Mark 8:3 share G3523 νῆστις (in 2 vv) and G1590 ἐκλύω (in 5 vv), plus G3598 ὁδός (in 99 vv); Mark 8:7 shares the rare diminutive G2485 ἰχθύδιον (in 2 vv) with Matthew 15:34; Mark 8:8 shares G5526 χορτάζω (in 15 vv) and G2033 ἑπτά. Greek to Greek, and both New Testament, so no Testament boundary is crossed
κυλλός: made whole here, cut off there verbal / quotation: confirmed
The word BSB renders “crippled” in vv. 30 and 31 is κυλλός (G2948), and the Verifier finds it in only four verses of the Greek New Testament. Two of them are this unit; the others are Matthew 18:8 and Mark 9:43, where a hand is cut off and the maimed body is judged a better thing than a whole body in hell. Barnes and Pulpit both send the reader to Matthew 18:8 for the word's meaning, and the same passage shares χωλός (G5560, lame, in 14 vv) and πούς (G4228, foot) with Matthew 15:30. The verbal link is firm and the theology is deliberately unresolved: here the Lord restores what the disciple is elsewhere told to lose.
Matthew 18:8 · Mark 9:43
basis: Verifier: shared rare lexeme G2948 κυλλός (in 4 vv) with Matthew 18:8 and Mark 9:43, plus G5560 χωλός (in 14 vv) and G4228 πούς (in 86 vv) with Matthew 18:8; all three passages Greek and New Testament, so this is verbal contact between Gospel texts, not a quotation of Scripture
Two feedings, two basket words, and the Lord's own audit verbal / quotation: confirmed
Ellicott's case against collapsing this miracle into the feeding of the five thousand rests on the vocabulary: “the words rendered in both narratives by ‘basket’ in the Authorised version are not the same in the Greek. Here the word is σπνρις (spuris), the hamper in which provisions were packed... while in the other it was the κόφινος (cophinus).” The Verifier confirms the lexical bridges: Matthew 14:20 shares χορτάζω (G5526, in 15 vv) and φάγω with Matthew 15:37, and Matthew 16:10 shares ἄρτος and ἑπτά. Matthew 16:9 to 10 is Christ Himself auditing both events by their numbers and their basket words, which Ellicott, Gill, Poole and Pulpit all treat as decisive. Within the Gospels, so no Old Testament quotation is in view.
Matthew 14:20 · Matthew 16:10 · Mark 8:19 · Mark 8:20 · Luke 9:17
basis: Verifier: shared G5526 χορτάζω (in 15 vv) and G5315 φάγω with Matthew 14:20 and Luke 9:17; shared G740 ἄρτος (in 89 vv) and G2033 ἑπτά (in 63 vv) with Matthew 16:10 and Mark 8:19 to 20, and G4214 πόσος (in 27 vv) with Mark 8:19 to 20; all New Testament Greek, and Matthew 16:9 to 10 is an internal citation of both feedings by the Lord Himself
The catalogue that answers the question sent from prison structural / thematic: confirmed
Matthew 11:5 and Luke 7:22 answer John's messengers with a list: blind, lame, deaf. The Verifier shows all three of the unit's diagnostic lexemes shared with both verses, χωλός (G5560, in 14 vv), τυφλός (G5185, in 46 vv) and κωφός (G2974, in 12 vv). Here in vv. 30 to 31 the same catalogue is not spoken but performed, twice, forwards and then in reverse. We tier this structural rather than verbal on purpose: the words really are shared, but neither passage cites the other, and the list is a stock Messianic catalogue rather than a quotation.
Matthew 11:5 · Luke 7:22
basis: Verifier: shared G5560 χωλός (in 14 vv), G5185 τυφλός (in 46 vv), G2974 κωφός (in 12 vv) with both Matthew 11:5 and Luke 7:22; a genuine verbal overlap deliberately tiered structural because no citation is made in either direction and none of the lexemes is rare enough to force a quotation claim
Isaiah's signs, unquoted structural / thematic: confirmed
Gill is the one voice in this unit who names the prophecy: the lame walking and the blind seeing were “prophesied of the times of the Messiah, and as things to be effected by him, Isaiah 35:5.” Isaiah 35:5 to 6 promises opened eyes, unstopped ears, a leaping lame man and a singing dumb tongue; Isaiah 29:18 to 19 promises the deaf hearing and the poor rejoicing, and two verses later has the house of Jacob sanctifying the God of Israel, which is the very doxology of v. 31. Matthew supplies no citation formula here, and a Greek text cannot share Strong's numbers with a Hebrew one, so this cannot be tiered verbal at all: the basis is a matched motif plus a named commentator's identification.
Isaiah 35:5 · Isaiah 35:6 · Isaiah 29:18 · Isaiah 29:23 · Psalm 41:13
basis: No shared Strong's lexeme is computable across Testaments (Greek to Hebrew), so a verbal tier is impossible in principle; the recorded basis is Gill's explicit identification of Isaiah 35:5 at Matthew 15:31 plus the item for item match of the healing catalogue, and the covenant title “the God of Israel” which stands in Isaiah 29:23 and Psalm 41:13. Matthew gives no quotation formula
A table spread in a desolation structural / thematic: confirmed
The disciples' word for the place is ἐρημίᾳ (G2047), rare at four verses, and the Verifier's one candidate outside the Synoptic parallels is Hebrews 11:38, of those who wandered “in deserts, and in mountains,” sharing both ἐρημία and ὄρος (G3735) with Matthew 15:29 and 33. Behind the question itself lies Israel's, recorded at Psalm 78:19: can God spread a table in the wilderness? Pulpit reaches for the same history unprompted, citing Exodus 17 and Numbers 11 as the precedent for the disciples' failure of memory. Isaiah 25:6 sets the answer on a mountain, a feast of fat things for all peoples. Cross-Testament, so tiered structural: the mountain and the spread table are a shared pattern, not a quotation.
Psalm 78:19 · Exodus 16:4 · Isaiah 25:6 · Hebrews 11:38
basis: Verifier: Hebrews 11:38 shares the rare G2047 ἐρημία (in 4 vv) and G3735 ὄρος (in 63 vv), Greek to Greek; the Old Testament refs share no computable lexeme with a Greek text and rest on the motif of food given in a wilderness (Exodus 16, Psalm 78:19) and a feast on a mountain (Isaiah 25:6), with Pulpit citing Exodus 17 and Numbers 11 at Matthew 15:33. No quotation is claimed
The shepherd who feeds the flock himself typological
Geneva reads v. 29 as shepherding before any bread appears: “in the midst of wolves he gathers together and cares for his flock.” The shape of Ezekiel 34 is the same shape as this unit, and in that order: one shepherd set over the flock, the weak and the sick sought out and healed, the flock fed and made to lie down. Psalm 23 has the lying down, the table and the not wanting. Matthew's own verb χορτάζω is a foddering word, which fits a flock better than a dinner party. This is a figural reading of the narrative rather than anything Matthew states, and it is the ancient and widely held one, standing in Geneva here and assumed by Henry's whole treatment.
Ezekiel 34:23 · Ezekiel 34:16 · Psalm 23:1 · Psalm 23:5
basis: Figural, not verbal: Greek to Hebrew allows no shared Strong's number. The basis is the sequence shared with Ezekiel 34 (one shepherd, the sick healed, the flock fed and laid down) plus the fodder sense of G5526 χορτάζω at Matthew 15:33 and 37; attested in this unit by Geneva's flock gloss at Matthew 15:29. Ancient and widely held rather than novel
Took, gave thanks, broke, kept giving: the sequence that will be kept at the table verbal / quotation: confirmed
Verse 36 runs ἔλαβεν, εὐχαριστήσας, ἔκλασεν, ἐδίδου. The same four verbs, in that order, carry the institution of the Supper, where Luke 22:19 and 1 Corinthians 11:24 use the thanksgiving participle rather than Matthew 26:26's blessing. Checked directly, the Verifier returns shared G2806 κλάω (in 14 vv), G2168 εὐχαριστέω (in 37 vv), G740 ἄρτος, G2983 λαμβάνω and G1325 δίδωμι between Matthew 15:36 and Luke 22:19. Pulpit's judgment that the thanksgiving here was “the efficient cause of the multiplication of the food” fits the pattern without needing it. What is claimed is only the shared formula, Greek to Greek within the New Testament: neither passage cites the other, and no commentator in this brief connects them.
Luke 22:19 · 1 Corinthians 11:24 · Matthew 26:26
basis: Verifier pair check, Matthew 15:36 to Luke 22:19: shared G2806 κλάω (in 14 vv), G2168 εὐχαριστέω (in 37 vv), G740 ἄρτος (in 89 vv), G2983 λαμβάνω (in 243 vv), G1325 δίδωμι (in 378 vv); Matthew 15:36 to 1 Corinthians 11:24 shares G2806 and G2168. All New Testament Greek, so no Testament boundary is crossed; the link is a shared verbal sequence, not a citation
Magadan, Magdala, Dalmanutha, Migdol: a destination the sources cannot fix flagged: verify source
Verse 39's place name is unsettled at every level. Ellicott and Cambridge both report that the better manuscripts read Magadan, the familiar Magdala having displaced it; Mark says Dalmanutha, which Gill makes a place inside the coasts of Magdala and Ellicott identifies with Ain el Barideh; Poole records the older guesses that these were one town with two names, or two towns nearby. Barnes then adds a further identification, that Magdala “was probably the same place which was formerly called Migdol, Joshua 19:38,” and Cambridge floats Rawlinson's Magdolus of Herodotus while itself suspecting that Herodotus “has mistaken Migdol for Megiddo.” Gill repeats both the Herodotus and the Megiddo suggestions. We record the link and flag it: the provenance is disputed by the very sources that propose it, and no lexical check is possible across Testaments.
Joshua 19:38 · Mark 8:10
basis: Contested provenance. Barnes' equation of Magdala with Migdol (Joshua 19:38) is offered as probable, not established; Cambridge reports Rawlinson's Magdolus identification and then doubts it as a possible confusion with Megiddo; Ellicott and Cambridge prefer the reading Magadan over Magdala, and Mark 8:10 has Dalmanutha instead. Greek to Hebrew allows no shared Strong's basis. Verify before relying on it