AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The rare word for talking: Matthew's mountain and Mark's verbal / quotation: confirmed
Matthew leaves the content of the mountain conversation blank; Mark uses the same uncommon compound and Luke supplies the subject. The Verifier confirms the shared lexeme συλλαλέω (G4814, in only 6 verses) between Matthew 17:3 and Mark 9:4, alongside the shared names Elijah (G2243, 29 verses) and Moses (G3475, 79 verses), and παραλαμβάνω (G3880, 49 verses) between Matthew 17:1 and Mark 9:2. Ellicott, Benson, Cambridge and Barnes all report from Luke that the topic was the exodos to be accomplished at Jerusalem, and Ellicott notes that word recurs in the New Testament only at 2 Peter 1:15, in a passage recalling this mountain.
Mark 9:2 · Mark 9:4 · Luke 9:33
basis: Verifier: rare shared Greek lexeme G4814 συλλαλέω (in 6 vv) with Mark 9:4, plus G2243 Ἡλίας (29 vv), G3475 Μωσεύς (79 vv) and G3880 παραλαμβάνω (49 vv) with Mark 9:2. Greek to Greek, so the verbal tier is available. Luke 9:33 is included on the shared names only, a weaker basis than the Mark link.
Metamorphosed: the verb Paul turns on the church verbal / quotation: confirmed
μετεμορφώθη is not a special-purpose word for this event. The Verifier finds the lexeme in only four verses of the Greek Scriptures, and one of them is 2 Corinthians 3:18, where believers with unveiled face are being changed into the same image from glory to glory; the noun πρόσωπον is shared as well. Ellicott records that everywhere outside this scene and its Mark parallel the word is rendered "transformed" and used spiritually, and Henry, reading the episode pastorally, expects it to "give them an idea of the glory prepared for them, when changed by his power and made like him." Pulpit quotes Gregory to the same end, that the Transfiguration announces "the glory of the final resurrection." The link is a real verbal one; what is inferred rather than stated is that Paul had this mountain in view.
2 Corinthians 3:18
basis: Verifier: rare shared Greek lexeme G3339 μεταμορφόω (in 4 vv) plus G4383 πρόσωπον (71 vv). Greek to Greek verbal link between Matthew 17:2 and 2 Corinthians 3:18; the theological inference that Paul alludes to this event is ours and is not part of the recorded basis.
Full of light: the cloud and the lamp structural / thematic: confirmed
The adjective for the cloud, φωτεινή, is rare enough to be worth following. The Verifier finds G5460 in only four verses, two of which are the lamp saying of Matthew 6:22 and Luke 11:34, where the single eye makes the whole body phōteinon, full of light. In Matthew the same word therefore covers both the vessel that holds God's presence on the mountain and the body of the disciple whose eye is sound; and on the mountain the disciples' eyes are exactly what fail them, pressed into the ground in v. 6 and lifted again only in v. 8. The verbal tie is real; the reading we draw from it is ours.
Matthew 6:22 · Luke 11:34
basis: Verifier: rare shared Greek lexeme G5460 φωτεινός (in 4 vv) with G3788 ὀφθαλμός (85 vv) in both Matthew 6:22 and Luke 11:34. Deliberately downgraded from the verbal tier the rarity would allow: the adjective is used in two different senses (a luminous cloud, a body full of light) and no quotation or citation is involved, so the honest basis is a rare shared lexeme inside a shared motif of light.
Overshadowed: the cloud that covers and the fear of entering it verbal / quotation: confirmed
ἐπισκιάζω (G1982) occurs in only five verses by the Verifier's count, and one of them is Luke 9:34, the parallel, which adds what Matthew omits: they feared as they entered into the cloud. Poole builds his whole note on that addition, that the cloud encompassed all six figures and "This still increased their fear"; Pulpit agrees that the apostles were within its influence though outside its immediate contact. Barnes reads the verb against its own root, insisting it here means to be diffused over rather than to shade, which is a real and unresolved disagreement with Poole's "something of a shadow in it."
Luke 9:34
basis: Verifier: rare shared Greek lexeme G1982 ἐπισκιάζω (in 5 vv), with G3507 νεφέλη (21 vv) and G5399 φοβέω (92 vv). Greek to Greek parallel account, so the verbal tier is available.
The voice out of the cloud: three Old Testament texts in one sentence structural / thematic: confirmed
The Father's words are a composite. Pulpit names two of the sources outright, Psalm 2:7 ("Thou art my Son") and Isaiah 42:1 ("Behold my Servant ... my Chosen in whom my soul delighteth"), calling them "fontal in the earlier Scriptures"; Benson, Poole and Pulpit all identify the closing command with Deuteronomy 18:15, the prophet like Moses "unto him shall ye hearken," and Poole draws the irony that Moses, standing there, "saw what he had before prophesied of ... fulfilled." Note the tier honestly: the citation is explicit in the text, but the link runs from Greek Matthew to Hebrew Psalms, Isaiah and Deuteronomy, so no shared Strong's lexeme can be computed and the verbal tier is unavailable by construction, not by doubt.
Psalm 2:7 · Isaiah 42:1 · Deuteronomy 18:15
basis: Named by Pulpit (Psalm 2:7, Isaiah 42:1) and by Benson, Poole and Pulpit (Deuteronomy 18:15). The quotation is explicit in the text, but the link is cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so shared Strong's numbers cannot be computed and the verbal tier is unavailable; basis is commentator attestation plus the composite wording itself.
Elijah must come first: Malachi, and a dispute the brief does not settle structural / thematic: confirmed
The scribes' doctrine in v. 10 is Malachi's. Pulpit cites both halves, the Messenger of Malachi 3:1 and the Elijah of Malachi 4:5, and argues that the two are distinct figures which the Jewish reading collapsed into one; Gill cites Malachi 4:6 as the true gloss on "restore all things," read through Luke 1:17; Poole documents the tradition from Jewish sources and from the questioning of John in John 1:21. The commentators then divide, and we record the division rather than resolving it: Ellicott holds the prophecy fulfilled in the Baptist and warns that those still awaiting a personal Elijah place themselves with those whose perception Christ condemned; Pulpit holds that v. 11's present and future tenses require a literal future coming; Cambridge reports both positions without choosing. Cross-Testament, so no verbal tier.
Malachi 4:5 · Malachi 3:1 · Luke 1:17
basis: Explicit in the text (the scribes' doctrine and Christ's concession) and named by Pulpit, Gill, Poole, Barnes, Cambridge and Ellicott. Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew) for Malachi, so shared Strong's lexemes cannot be computed and the verbal tier is unavailable. The interpretation is contested among these same sources; only the citation is confirmed here.
Two men on a mountain, a shining face, and booths of branches typological
Every furnishing of this scene has a precedent. Moses went up into a mountain and the cloud covered it six days (Exodus 24:12-18); he came down with a shining face that made Israel afraid to approach (Exodus 34:29-35), which Ellicott and Barnes both cite for v. 2, and Ellicott again for the disciples' fear in v. 6. Elijah met God at a mountain after forty days (1 Kings 19:8-13). The cloud filling the tabernacle and the temple so that the priests could not stand to minister (Exodus 40:34-35, 1 Kings 8:10-11) is named by Ellicott, Benson, Barnes, Poole, Gill and Pulpit. Peter's three σκηναί are the booths of Leviticus 23:42-43, as Gill, Barnes, Pulpit and Cambridge all say. This is a figural reading of the mountain as the second Sinai, and it is the ancient and widely-held one, not our invention; the tier is typological because it reads pattern and fulfilment, not quotation, and because it is cross-Testament no verbal basis exists.
Exodus 24:12-18 · Exodus 34:29-35 · Exodus 40:34-35 · 1 Kings 19:8-13 · 1 Kings 8:10-11 · Leviticus 23:42-43
basis: Figural reading of the Transfiguration as a second Sinai, attested across the brief (Ellicott, Benson, Barnes, Poole, Gill, Pulpit, Cambridge cite these exact passages). Cross-Testament, so no shared Strong's basis is computable; widely-held rather than novel.
Falling facedown before the voice structural / thematic: confirmed
The collapse of v. 6 follows a fixed pattern. Benson lists the precedents himself: Genesis 15:12, Isaiah 6:5, Ezekiel 2:1, Daniel 10:8, Revelation 1:17, adding that "human nature could not of itself support such manifestations." Pulpit adds Isaiah 6:5-7 and Daniel 10:8-10 for the touch that restores. The pattern is tight: hearing or seeing, prostration, a touch, a word forbidding fear, then standing (compare Daniel 8:17-18, Daniel 10:9, Ezekiel 1:28). What Matthew does with it is distinctive: the one who touches and raises is the one whose glory knocked them down.
Daniel 8:17-18 · Daniel 10:9 · Ezekiel 1:28 · Isaiah 6:5
basis: Shared prophetic call pattern (voice, prostration, touch, do not fear, raised), with the specific references supplied by Benson and Pulpit. Cross-Testament, so no shared Strong's lexeme can be computed; no quotation is claimed.
The eyewitness claim, and a provenance the brief itself disputes flagged: verify source
2 Peter 1:16-18 claims first-hand presence: not cunningly devised fables, but eyewitnesses of his majesty, who heard the voice out of the excellent glory on the holy mount. Barnes, Benson, Poole, Gill and Pulpit all use it as Peter's own corroboration, and Gill leans on it for the clause "in whom I am well pleased" which Mark and Luke lack. But Ellicott flags the source in the same breath as he uses it, allowing it evidential weight only "though with less certainty, owing to the doubt which hangs over the genuineness of that Epistle." We flag it rather than settle it: the passage's relevance is not in question, its authorship is contested within our own sources.
2 Peter 1:16-18
basis: No Verifier lexeme basis was computed for this pair. The link is thematic and explicit in 2 Peter's own wording, but authorship of 2 Peter is disputed inside the brief itself: Ellicott grants it weight only with reservation about the Epistle's genuineness, while Barnes, Benson, Poole, Gill and Pulpit treat it as Peter's testimony. Verify before relying on it as apostolic corroboration.