AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The verb that closes a discourse verbal / quotation: confirmed
⚙ Matthew 19:1 and Matthew 13:53 share the same seam: “when Jesus had finished these words, he removed.” μεταίρω (G3332) appears in only two verses in the whole New Testament, and these are they, paired with τελέω (G5055), Matthew's discourse-closing verb. Pulpit notes the formulary character of the opening, “commencing, as usual, with the formulary, And it came to pass.” The link is structural in effect (Matthew is building a book of five discourses) but verbal in its evidence.
Matthew 13:53
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G3332 μεταίρω (in 2 vv, so these two verses are its entire New Testament range) and G5055 τελέω (in 28 vv), with G3753 ὅτε (in 102 vv); both verses Greek, same author
What God yoked together verbal / quotation: confirmed
⚙ Matthew 19:6 and Mark 10:9 are the same saying in the same words, and συζεύγνυμι (G4801) occurs nowhere else in the New Testament. Geneva glosses the yoke image at Matthew 19:6: God “Has made them yokefellows, as the marriage itself is called a yoke, by a borrowed kind of speech.” Mark is the control text for this whole unit, and Cambridge, Poole and Pulpit all read Matthew through it.
Mark 10:9
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G4801 συζεύγνυμι (in 2 vv, its complete range) and G5563 χωρίζω (in 12 vv); both verses Greek
The scroll of standing-away verbal / quotation: confirmed
⚙ The Pharisees' quotation of Moses in Matthew 19:7 is reported in Mark 10:4 with the same rare noun, ἀποστάσιον (G647), “something separative,” a scroll of standing-apart. Pulpit notes what the document accomplished procedurally: it required a writing “formally prepared and witnessed, necessitating certain delay and publicity,” and Barnes adds that the delay itself was a brake on a husband's anger.
Mark 10:4
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G647 ἀποστάσιον (in 3 vv, rare), G975 βιβλίον (in 29 vv), G630 ἀπολύω (in 61 vv); both verses Greek
Hardness of heart, and whose verbal / quotation: confirmed
⚙ σκληροκαρδία (G4641) occurs in only three verses. One is Matthew 19:8, one is Mark 10:5 (the same conversation), and one is Mark 16:14, where the risen Christ upbraids the eleven for exactly this. Cambridge notes at Matthew 19:8 that interpreters divide over whether the hardness is toward God or toward wives, and Ellicott extends the principle to every concessive law. We take the Mark 16:14 occurrence as the sting: the word the Lord uses of the Pharisees' fathers is the word he uses of his own apostles.
Mark 10:5 · Mark 16:14
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G4641 σκληροκαρδία (in 3 vv, so Matthew 19:8, Mark 10:5 and Mark 16:14 exhaust it); all Greek
Male and female, and one in Christ verbal / quotation: confirmed
⚙ ἄρσην (G730) and θῆλυς (G2338) are both rare in the New Testament, and the cluster that carries them is small: Matthew 19:4, Mark 10:6, Romans 1:27 and Galatians 3:28. The same created pairing that Jesus cites to make marriage indissoluble is the pairing Paul says is transcended in Christ (“there is neither male nor female”) and the pairing Romans 1:27 says is inverted in sin. ⚙ We claim only the lexical cluster and the shared reference to the creation of the sexes; Paul in Galatians is speaking of standing in Christ, not of marriage, and to read him as dissolving Matthew 19:4 would be to overrun both texts.
Mark 10:6 · Galatians 3:28 · Romans 1:27
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G730 ἄῤῥην (in 7 vv) and G2338 θῆλυς (in 5 vv), both rare, plus G1520 εἷς (in 288 vv) with Galatians 3:28 and G746 ἀρχή (in 55 vv) with Mark 10:6; all verses Greek, so a real verbal cluster, though the theological uses differ
“Made them male and female” and “one flesh”: the two quotations structural / thematic: confirmed
⚙ Verses 4 and 5 are not allusions but citations: Genesis 1:27 (with Genesis 5:2) and Genesis 2:24, quoted in Greek. Barnes gives the references and the argument; Poole says Jesus “refers them to the first institution of marriage, and for that to the book of Genesis”; Pulpit records the textual detail that οἱ δύο, “the two,” stands in the Septuagint and Samaritan Pentateuch but not in the present Hebrew of Genesis 2:24, and that “Our Lord adopts the addition as conveying the correct sense.” Ellicott adds that words spoken by Adam, “prompted by the Holy Spirit,” may be heard as “an oracle from God.”
Genesis 1:27 · Genesis 5:2 · Genesis 2:24
basis: Explicit quotation, named in the BSB text itself and in Barnes, Poole and Pulpit at these verses. A Greek to Hebrew pair shares no computable Strong's lexeme, so the Verifier can record no verbal basis and no verbal tier is claimed, even though this is a quotation in fact
Moses' certificate: the statute behind the question structural / thematic: confirmed
⚙ Verse 7 cites Deuteronomy 24:1-4 by content. Barnes, Gill, Poole and Pulpit all name it. Poole shows how the Pharisees had stretched it, reading “some uncleanness” as “any kind of deformity, or natural infirmity, not merely of moral uncleanness”; Pulpit notes that Moses elsewhere forbade divorce outright (Deuteronomy 22:13-19, 28-29), which is decisive against calling the Deuteronomy provision a command to divorce.
Deuteronomy 24:1 · Deuteronomy 22:19
basis: Explicit citation of Moses on the certificate of divorce (Deuteronomy 24:1-4) in the Pharisees' question, with Deuteronomy 22:13-19 adduced by Pulpit as the counter-case. Greek to Hebrew, so no shared Strong's lexeme is computable and no verbal tier is claimed
Circumcise the heart: the diagnosis Israel already had structural / thematic: confirmed
⚙ The hardness Jesus names in verse 8 is not a new charge. The Law itself demanded a circumcised heart (Deuteronomy 10:16), Jeremiah repeated the demand (Jeremiah 4:4), Ezekiel promised the replacement of the stone heart with flesh (Ezekiel 36:26), and Malachi tied divorce directly to covenant faithlessness. Ellicott draws exactly this conclusion, that “hardness of heart” explains whatever else in the Law “strikes us as deviating from the standard of eternal righteousness embodied in the law of Christ.” ⚙ Our own addition is only the chain of texts; the diagnosis is the Lord's.
Deuteronomy 10:16 · Jeremiah 4:4 · Ezekiel 36:26 · Malachi 2:16
basis: Shared motif of the hard and uncircumcised heart, with Malachi 2:14-16 as the prophetic word against divorce. Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so no shared Strong's lexeme exists to compute and the link is tiered thematic, not verbal; the Ezekiel and Jeremiah contacts are ours by motif, not cited by the Gospel text
The eunuch: from the excluded to the named typological
⚙ Deuteronomy 23:1 shut the eunuch out of the assembly of the LORD. Isaiah 56:3-5 answers it directly: let not the eunuch say “I am a dry tree,” for God will give him “a name better than sons and daughters.” In Matthew 19:12 the Lord takes that very word, εὐνοῦχος (G2135), and makes it a vocation “for the sake of the kingdom of the heavens.” Pulpit points the reader to Isaiah 56:3-4 at this verse, and Cambridge notes that men had abstained from marriage “in order to devote themselves to the study of the law.” ⚙ We read the reversal as figural, not as a quotation: Matthew does not cite Isaiah here, and the connection is ours and Pulpit's by motif.
Deuteronomy 23:1 · Isaiah 56:4
basis: Figural reading of the Law's exclusion of the eunuch overturned by Isaiah's promise and taken up as a kingdom vocation. Widely held in substance (Pulpit cross-references Isaiah 56:3-4 at Matthew 19:12) but not a quotation; Greek to Hebrew, so no shared Strong's lexeme is computable and no verbal tier is possible
The same saying, twice before, in Matthew's own book structural / thematic: confirmed
⚙ Matthew has already recorded this ruling twice, at Matthew 5:31-32, and Luke has it at Luke 16:18. Ellicott, Barnes, Gill, Cambridge and Pulpit all send the reader back to Matthew 5:32 rather than re-argue the case, and Benson (citing Macknight) makes the repetition the point: the Pharisees probably knew his opinion already and hoped a third statement would either incense the people or catch him contradicting himself, but “Jesus, always consistent with himself, boldly declared the third time against arbitrary divorces.”
Matthew 5:31 · Matthew 5:32
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexemes G630 ἀπολύω (in 61 vv), G1135 γυνή (in 195 vv), G3056 λόγος (in 318 vv). The lexemes are common rather than rare, so we decline a verbal tier and record this as the same author restating the same ruling
The exception clause: worded differently in every witness flagged: verify source
⚙ This is the one link in the unit we will not certify. Matthew 19:9 carries an exception (“not upon sexual immorality”) that Mark 10:11 and Luke 16:18 do not carry at all, and Matthew's own wording here is contested: Cambridge records that “and shall marry another” is omitted in the Sinaitic manuscript and that “causeth her to commit adultery” has high manuscript authority, while Pulpit reports that Tregelles, Tischendorf, Westcott and Hort omit the εἰ, and that Lachmann imports the clause from Matthew 5:32. Pulpit also notes from Mark that this part of the conversation was spoken “in the house,” to the disciples, and that Matthew 19:10-12 has no parallel anywhere. ⚙ We therefore flag the harmonisation itself: the saying is certainly shared, but any claim about its exact wording, and so about what it exempts, rests on witnesses that disagree.
Mark 10:11 · Luke 16:18
basis: Verifier gives only common shared lexemes for Mark 10:11 (G630 ἀπολύω in 61 vv, G1135 γυνή in 195 vv), so no verbal tier is available; and the substance of the link, the exception clause, is textually contested in Matthew 19:9 (Cambridge on the Sinaitic omissions; Pulpit on Tregelles, Tischendorf, Westcott and Hort, and on Lachmann's importation from Matthew 5:32) and absent from Mark and Luke. Luke 16:18 is our reference from the commentators, not a Verifier candidate