Then the Pharisees went out and conspired to trap Jesus in His words.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Tote hoi Pharisaioi poreuthentes elabon symboulion hopōs pagideusōsin auton en logō
The Fallible · Synthetic · Study Bible
Paying Taxes to Caesar
Matthew 22:15–22 — Paying Taxes to Caesar. Each verse below carries the full apparatus: the Berean Standard Bible, the vocalized original (tap any word), and a parsed breakdown of every term transcribed from the interlinear. Synthesized commentary, canonical threads, and the reading of Christ gather at the end, over the whole unit.
Then the Pharisees went out and conspired to trap Jesus in His words.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Tote hoi Pharisaioi poreuthentes elabon symboulion hopōs pagideusōsin auton en logō
They sent their disciples to Him along with the Herodians. “Teacher,” they said, “we know that You are honest and that You teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. You seek favor from no one, because You pay no attention to external appearance.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
kai apostellousin autōn tous mathētas autō meta tōn Hērōdianōn Didaskale legontes oidamen hoti ei alēthēs kai didaskeis tēn hodon tou Theou en alētheia kai soi melei peri ou oudenos gar ou blepeis eis prosōpon anthrōpōn
So tell us what You think: Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar or not?”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
oun eipon hēmin ti soi dokei exestin dounai kēnson Kaisari ē ou
But Jesus knew their evil intent and said, “You hypocrites, why are you testing Me?
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
de ho Iēsous Gnous autōn tēn ponērian eipen hypokritai Ti peirazete me
Show Me the coin used for the tax.” And they brought Him a denarius.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
epideixate moi to nomisma tou kēnsou de Hoi prosēnenkan autō dēnarion
“Whose image is this,” He asked, “and whose inscription?”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Tinos hē eikōn hautē Kai legei autois kai hē epigraphē
“Caesar’s,” they answered. So Jesus told them, “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.”
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kaisaros Legousin autō oun Tote legei autois Apodote Kaisari ta Kaisaros kai tō Theō ta tou Theou
And when they heard this, they were amazed. So they left Him and went away.
Berean Standard Bible · CC0
Greek — tap a word ↓
Kai akousantes ethaumasan kai aphentes auton apēlthan
The verse-by-verse work is done. What follows gathers the whole unit. All three layers below are machine-generated (⚙). Weigh them; they have no authority.
AI synthesis — woven from the public-domain voices above and the original text; generated and fallible.
Matthew opens with a departure and a committee. The Pharisees, having heard themselves described in three parables, go out and ἔλαβον συμβούλιον, take counsel, a rare noun that in the Gospels almost always names a formal decision to destroy Jesus. Gill fills in the motive with unusual care: they were provoked "to the last degree" yet "durst they not use any violence for fear of the people," so they withdrew to a chamber; Pulpit names it the hall of the Sanhedrin. The purpose verb is παγιδεύσωσιν, and both Cambridge and Pulpit record that it appears nowhere else in the New Testament: Cambridge glosses it "as a fowler ensnares birds," Geneva that it is "derived from snares which hunters lay," Barnes adding the mechanics of leading a bird under the net before springing it. Note what Barnes also observes about the object: "in word" is singular and the possessive "his" is supplied by translators. They are not trapping something He said. They are building a net for something He has not yet said.
The delegation is a scandal of political arithmetic. Pharisees who held foreign rule a blasphemy send their own students alongside Herodians who lived by Rome's favor; Pulpit's line is the best in the brief, that "hatred, like poverty, makes men acquainted with strange companions," and Benson calls the alliance "a very memorable proof of the keenness of that malice which could thus cause them to forget so deep a quarrel with each other." The commentators disagree openly about who the Herodians were: Ellicott lays out two contradictory theories and concedes the matter is "conjecture," Gill catalogues and demolishes half a dozen identifications, Poole ends with the honest shrug that their principles are "not so plain, nor of much concern to us to know." Then comes the flattery, and every word of it is true. He is ἀληθής, one who conceals nothing; He teaches the way of God in truth; He does not βλέπεις εἰς πρόσωπον ἀνθρώπων, look into the face of men. Barnes shows that last phrase is the Bible's standing idiom for partiality and gathers the chain: Leviticus 19:15, Deuteronomy 16:19, Acts 10:34, James 2:1, 1 Peter 1:17. Henry makes the right use of the irony: "What they said of Christ was right; whether they knew it or not, blessed be God we know it."
The question is engineered so that either answer destroys Him. Pulpit and Ellicott set out the two jaws: say yes and He loses the crowd as a traitor courting their oppressors, forfeiting any Messianic claim; say no and He is denounced to Pilate as a fomenter of sedition, which Luke 23:2 shows is the charge they eventually laid anyway. Ellicott specifies the tax: the Latin κῆνσος, a poll tax of one denarius a head, felt as a deeper humiliation than customs because it was levied on the person, and already the occasion of armed resistance under Judas of Galilee. Cambridge supplies the scriptural pretext claimed for refusal, Deuteronomy 17:15, and immediately undercuts it with history: Israel had been tributary in turn to Assyria, Babylon, Egypt and Persia. Jesus answers first not the question but the questioners. Γνοὺς stands before the verb of speech, and Barnes draws the inference: the knowledge "proves that he was omniscient," since "no more man has the power of discerning the motives of others." Gill says it flatly, that He "saw the wickedness of their hearts," and Henry gives the pastoral form: "Whatever mask the hypocrite puts on, our Lord Jesus sees through it." The one word ὑποκριταί, stage players, ends the performance.
He refuses to rule and asks for an exhibit instead. Pulpit sees the strategy exactly: "he gives no decision about the matter in dispute, such as they desired. He virtually rebukes their dissimulation, and makes their own action supply the verdict which they demanded." The word He uses for the coin is νόμισμα, not ordinary money but what is legally reckoned as value. Barnes notes the currency distinction that makes the request lethal: temple dues were paid in the Jewish shekel and Rome's tax in foreign coin, so "their having that coin about them, and using it, was proof that they themselves held it lawful to pay the tribute; and their pretensions, therefore, were mere hypocrisy." Cambridge adds that Jewish coins bore no royal effigy at all. Ellicott states the conclusion the object itself pronounces: "wherever it passed current, it was a witness that the independence of the country had passed away." Then the two questions: whose εἰκών, whose ἐπιγραφή. Gill, from rabbinic sources, confirms that Jewish coinage carried writing but no human form because "it is forbidden to make the form of a man." Pulpit reads the legend of a Tiberian denarius as naming the emperor son of the divine Augustus and, on the reverse, chief priest. If Pulpit's transcription is even roughly right, the object they produced in the temple court claimed divinity and priesthood for Caesar, and they had it in their purses.
They answer with one word, and the one word is the verdict. Gill and Cambridge both cite the rabbinic principle of currency, that he is king whose coin passes current, Gill quoting it from Maimonides as an agreement that "he is their Lord, and they are his servants." Now the verb. They had asked about δοῦναι, to give; He commands ἀπόδοτε, give back, pay what is owed, which Cambridge glosses "pay back as due" and Pulpit "give back, as a due." That prefix is the whole answer: the tax is not a concession wrung from God's people but a debt discharged. And in the same breath the second creditor appears, with an article the first half lacks, τὰ τοῦ Θεοῦ. Poole states the logic: "His right and God's right are two distinct things." Ellicott, alone among these voices, sees what the saying does not do: it fixes no boundary line for particular cases, and "least of all does it sanction the identification of the claims of this or that form of ecclesiastical polity with the 'things that are God's.'" Cambridge notes Paul expanding the same principle at Romans 13:1 and following, where the Verifier confirms Paul reaching for this very verb. Benson turns the answer on each half of the delegation in turn: render to Caesar, ye Pharisees, what you already acknowledge to be his; and ye Herodians, zealous for Caesar, see that you render to God what is God's.
They ἐθαύμασαν, and then they leave. Barnes: "It was so wise; it so clearly detected their wickedness and foiled their aim, that they were confounded, and retired covered with shame." Ellicott balances the ledger: the Herodians could not charge Him with forbidding the tribute, and the Pharisees heard the duty toward God "pressed as strongly as they had ever pressed it." Poole's summary is the plainest: they go away "having played their game and got nothing." But Pulpit records what the wonder was worth, that these men or their comrades later had "the effrontery to accuse Jesus of forbidding to pay tribute to Caesar." Henry draws the conclusion the whole unit exists to force: "Christ is, and will be, the wonder, not only of his friends, but of his enemies. They admire his wisdom, but will not be guided by it; his power, but will not submit to it."
⚙ Read under Sola Scriptura and offered to be tested, this passage is not primarily about taxation. Two objects govern it: a coin bearing an image and an inscription, and a man bearing the image of God. Jesus is not dividing reality into a public sphere where Caesar rules and a private one where God does. He is applying a single principle twice: what carries a likeness returns to the one whose likeness it carries. The silver bears Tiberius, so let the silver go to Tiberius, and the loss is nothing. But the argument does not stop at the edge of the coin, because the question He asked was whose, and by that test man is not Caesar's at all. This is why the answer pressed the Pharisees harder than the Herodians: Ellicott is right that the Herodians could not indict Him, and right that the Pharisees heard their own doctrine turned on them. They had come pretending to fear an idolatrous claim on what belongs to God, while carrying in their purses the emperor's claim to be son of a god and chief priest, and while withholding from God the one thing that carries His stamp, themselves. The ⚙ synthesis here, which no voice in this brief states in these terms and which may be pressed too far: the trap failed not because Jesus found a clever middle path between two parties but because He changed the unit of account. They asked what the state may take. He answered what everything owes, and left them holding a coin that answered their question before they asked it.
Everything in the scene has an owner's mark on it, including the men asking who owns what.
AI-generated connections. Each carries a verification badge with a recorded basis; contested links are flagged.
The rare noun συμβούλιον (symboulion, G4824) stands in only eight verses of the New Testament, and the Verifier's candidates show where. Matthew 12:14 has the Pharisees take counsel against Jesus after the withered hand; Mark 3:6 has them do it "with the Herodians," the same coalition as here, which Pulpit and Ellicott both take to be the earlier league now renewed; Acts 25:12 has Festus confer with his consilium before sending Paul to Caesar. The sense in Acts is different, a governor's standing council rather than a plot, and that difference should be stated rather than smoothed over. But within the Gospels the word functions almost as a technical term: when Matthew and Mark want to say that a formal decision has been taken against Jesus, this is the noun they reach for, and in Mark 3:6 as here the purpose conjunction ὅπως (G3704) follows it.
Mark 3:6 · Matthew 12:14 · Acts 25:12
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G4824 συμβούλιον (in 8 vv, rare) with Mark 3:6, Matthew 12:14 and Acts 25:12; Mark 3:6 also shares G3704 ὅπως (in 52 vv) and G5330 Φαρισαῖος (in 93 vv). A rare shared lexeme across Greek texts, not a quotation of one by another; the sense in Acts 25:12 differs.
Of the five New Testament verses that contain ἐπιγραφή (epigraphē, G1923), three are this question and its synoptic parallels (Mark 12:16, Luke 20:24) and the other two are the inscription fixed over the crucified Jesus (Mark 15:26, Luke 23:38). The Verifier supplies all four as candidates on the strength of that one lexeme. Ellicott and Cambridge both insist on the translation "inscription" rather than the older "superscription," and Pulpit reconstructs what the denarius said: the emperor's name and titles, including Pontifex Maximus. Within a week the same noun will be used for a placard naming another king, written by the same imperial authority and for a different purpose. This thread records the lexical fact only; the figural reading built on it is in the christ section below and is marked as novel there.
Mark 12:16 · Mark 15:26 · Luke 23:38
basis: Verifier: shared Greek lexeme G1923 ἐπιγραφή (in 5 vv, very rare) with Mark 12:16, Mark 15:26 and Luke 23:38; Mark 12:16 additionally shares G2541 Καῖσαρ (in 23 vv) and G1504 εἰκών (in 20 vv). All Greek to Greek; a rare word shared, not a citation.
All three synoptics carry this episode, and the Verifier's strongest candidate for the unit is Mark 12:14, sharing ὁδός, βλέπω and πρόσωπον with Matthew 22:16, which is to say the flattering speech is transmitted in nearly the same words. Mark 12:13 shares λόγος and the rare party name Ἡρωδιανοί (G2265, in only three verses), and Luke 20:24 shares Caesar, denarius and inscription. Cambridge, Barnes, Poole and Pulpit all read the three accounts together and take details from Luke that Matthew omits, above all Luke 20:20, that the envoys were spies who "should feign themselves just men." JFB gives no exposition here at all, referring the reader entirely to Mark 12:13-34, which is why no JFB voice is quoted in this unit.
Mark 12:13 · Mark 12:14 · Luke 20:24
basis: Verifier: Mark 12:14 shares G3598 ὁδός (in 99 vv), G991 βλέπω (in 117 vv), G4383 πρόσωπον (in 71 vv); Mark 12:13 shares G3056 λόγος (in 318 vv), G5330 Φαρισαῖος (in 93 vv) and the rare G2265 Ἡρωδιανοί (in 3 vv); Luke 20:24 shares G2541 Καῖσαρ (in 23 vv), G1220 δηνάριον (in 15 vv), G1923 ἐπιγραφή (in 5 vv). Synoptic parallels of one narrative in the same language.
When Paul writes, in the words Pulpit quotes at this verse, "Render to all their dues" and "tribute to whom tribute is due" (Romans 13:7), he uses the verb Jesus used here, ἀποδίδωμι (G591). The Verifier, asked directly about the pair, returns the shared lexeme and rates the link structural rather than verbal, since apodidōmi stands in forty six verses and is not rare enough to carry a quotation claim on its own. Cambridge states the relation in exactly the right direction: "St Paul expands this principle, which underlies our Lord's answer," citing Romans 13:1 and following and 1 Peter 2:13-17. The 1 Peter reference is Cambridge's, not a computed lexical link, and is included on that authority.
Romans 13:7 · 1 Peter 2:13-17
basis: Verifier pair check on Matthew 22:21 and Romans 13:7: shared Greek lexeme G591 ἀποδίδωμι (in 46 vv), tiered structural because the lexeme is common; 1 Peter 2:13-17 is added on Cambridge's citation with no computed lexeme.
Jesus asks whose εἰκών the coin bears, and the answer settles the case. The image of God in man at Genesis 1:26 to 27 is the obvious counterweight, and the Verifier is blunt about what can and cannot be proved: asked to pair Matthew 22:20 with Genesis 1:27, it reports "no shared original-language lexeme found in the index," because the Hebrew there is a different word in a different language and no Strong's number is common to both. The observation that the Greek Old Testament renders Genesis 1:26 with this same noun comes from outside this brief and should be checked rather than trusted here. So the link is argued, not computed: the logic of "whose likeness is stamped on it" is the logic of the whole reply, and if a coin goes to the man whose image it bears, the argument does not stop at the purse. Neither Barnes, who notes only that princes struck their likeness on coinage, nor Gill, who documents from the rabbis that Jewish coins bore no human form, makes this move. It is marked here as figural and fallible.
Genesis 1:26-27
basis: Verifier pair check on Matthew 22:20 and Genesis 1:27 returns no shared original-language lexeme; Greek to Hebrew links cannot be verbal. Recorded as a figural reading of image and ownership, argued from the logic of the reply, widely held in later exposition but not stated by any voice in this brief.
The dilemma assumed that paying a pagan emperor must insult God's kingship over Israel. The Old Testament had already refused that assumption. Daniel, standing before a Babylonian king, says that God removes kings and sets up kings (Daniel 2:21) and that the Most High rules the kingdom of men and gives it to whomever He wills (Daniel 4:17, 4:25); Proverbs puts the reigning of kings in the gift of Wisdom (Proverbs 8:15); Jeremiah commands submission to Nebuchadnezzar as God's own arrangement (Jeremiah 27:6-8); and Ezra records a Persian king funding the temple and exempting its servants from tax (Ezra 6:8-10, 7:24), so that imperial revenue and the worship of God had coexisted within living memory of the Second Temple. Cambridge makes the historical half of this point when it answers the Deuteronomy 17:15 argument by listing Israel's successive overlords: Assyria, Babylon, Egypt and Persia. The theological half, that the emperor's de facto authority is itself an ordinance of God, is Ellicott's, and Benson gives the reason in a parenthesis: magistrates "are God's deputies, and rule by his authority."
Daniel 2:21 · Daniel 4:17 · Proverbs 8:15 · Jeremiah 27:6-8 · Ezra 6:8-10
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so no shared Strong's number is possible and no verbal claim is made. The basis is a shared motif, God's disposal of Gentile kingship and Israel's tribute to it, argued from the cited texts and from Cambridge's list of Israel's successive overlords.
Matthew's hapax παγιδεύω names the device; the Psalms and Proverbs had already described it working through praise. no truth is in the mouth of the wicked, who flatter with the tongue (Psalm 5:9); the double heart speaks with flattering lips (Psalm 12:2-3); the enemy hides his hatred behind charming speech and is not to be believed (Proverbs 26:24-28); and the hunted man prays to be kept from the snares laid for him (Psalm 141:9). These are summaries of those texts, not quotations of them. Read together with verse 16 the pattern is exact: a flawless compliment used as a net. None of the voices in this brief draws this particular connection; Cambridge comes nearest with the judgment that "nothing could exceed the insidious hypocrisy of this attack on Jesus. His enemies approach Him as a teacher whom they trust."
Psalm 5:9 · Psalm 12:2-3 · Proverbs 26:24-28 · Psalm 141:9
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew), so no shared lexeme and no verbal claim. Shared motif of flattering speech laid as a snare, matching the hapax G3802 παγιδεύω and the flattery of v. 16; the connection is the synthesis author's, not a voice's.
The flatterers' last clause is a quotation of Israel's own law about judges, turned into a compliment. that God does not lift the face and takes no bribe is the confession of Deuteronomy 10:17; the judge is commanded not to regard the face of the poor or the great in Leviticus 19:15; Jehoshaphat charges his judges that with the LORD there is no injustice or partiality (2 Chronicles 19:7); and the LORD tells Samuel that man looks at the outward appearance but He looks at the heart (1 Samuel 16:7). Barnes assembles most of this chain at verse 16 and states the rule, that in Scripture regarding the person "is in the Bible uniformly used to denote partiality." The irony belongs to the narrative rather than to any commentator: within two verses the one who does not look at faces has read their hearts, which is 1 Samuel 16:7 acted out on the men quoting it.
Deuteronomy 10:17 · Leviticus 19:15 · 1 Samuel 16:7 · 2 Chronicles 19:7
basis: Cross-Testament (Greek to Hebrew): G4383 πρόσωπον renders the Hebrew idiom of the lifted or regarded face, but no shared Strong's number exists across the languages, so no verbal tier. Basis is the shared legal idiom of impartiality, with Barnes's own list of Leviticus 19:15, Deuteronomy 16:19, Acts 10:34, James 2:1 and 1 Peter 1:17.
Both Cambridge and Barnes report that the command not to set a foreigner over Israel (Deuteronomy 17:15) was understood to forbid paying tribute to any foreign power, and Barnes attributes to Herod's party the counter-reading that the verse governs only a voluntary choice of king and not subjection by force, crediting the whole reconstruction to Dr Prideaux. That reading of the verse would explain the dilemma neatly, which is a reason to be careful with it. Neither commentator cites a primary source, the verse itself says nothing about tribute, and the tax question in this unit is put in terms of lawfulness in general rather than of that text. Gill and Poole, who quote rabbinic material freely elsewhere in this unit, do not use Deuteronomy 17:15 here at all. Recorded as a contested reconstruction of the background, not as an established basis.
Deuteronomy 17:15
basis: No shared lexeme is possible (Greek to Hebrew) and no verbal claim is made. The link rests entirely on Cambridge's and Barnes's unsourced assertion about how Deuteronomy 17:15 was interpreted, Barnes citing only Prideaux; provenance of the interpretation is unverified and the verse itself does not mention tribute.
AI-generated reading; weigh it against the text.
⚙ The question that ends the argument is a question about likeness. Barnes notes only the numismatic convention, that "the likeness of the reigning prince was usually struck on the coins," and Gill documents from the rabbis that Jewish coinage refused human figures because "it is forbidden to make the form of a man." Set those two facts side by side and the reply has a third term that the scene does not name: the New Testament's own use of εἰκών for Christ, the image of God (2 Corinthians 4:4, Colossians 1:15) and the exact imprint of His nature (Hebrews 1:3). If what bears Caesar's image returns to Caesar, then what bears God's image returns to God, and the one who bears it without alloy is standing in the temple court holding the coin. The apostolic titles are ancient and explicit; the application of them to this scene is the synthesis author's and is offered to be tested.
2 Corinthians 4:4 · Colossians 1:15 · Hebrews 1:3 · Genesis 1:26-27
⚙ The Verifier's own lexical data carries this: ἐπιγραφή occurs in only five New Testament verses, and outside this pericope and its parallels the only inscriptions so named are the one over the cross (Mark 15:26, Luke 23:38). Jesus asks whose inscription is on the silver; within the week the same imperial authority writes an inscription about Him, and it names Him king. The parallel is a matter of vocabulary and timing, and no voice in this brief draws it: Ellicott and Cambridge go no further than correcting "superscription" to "inscription," and Pulpit reconstructs only the denarius legend. Marked novel. What can be said without overclaiming is that Matthew's Gospel moves in a few chapters from a coin whose writing declares Caesar lord to a placard whose writing, meant as mockery, declares the truth.
Mark 15:26 · Luke 23:38
⚙ Christ's verb is ἀπόδοτε, pay back what is due, and Barnes puts the harder of his two readings of "the things that are God's" as "their hearts, lives, property, and influence all to God, as his due." On that reading the command He gives is a debt no one in the crowd had discharged, and Pulpit says as much: had the Jews rendered God his dues, they would never have been reduced to paying tribute at all. Poole and Henry both keep the two rights distinct without collapsing either, Henry noting that Christ "did not interpose as a judge in matters of this nature, for his kingdom is not of this world, but he enjoins peaceable subjection to the powers that be." The redemptive-historical reading, which the voices here do not state: the man who commanded this rendering is the only one who performed it, paying Caesar's tax (Matthew 17:25, which the Verifier links to this unit by shared vocabulary) and rendering to God everything that bore God's likeness, including His own life. Paul's expansion of the principle in Romans 13:7 stands on the obedience of the one who spoke it.
Matthew 17:25 · Romans 13:7
The biblical text is the Berean Standard Bible (BSB), public domain (CC0). Hebrew/Greek text, transliteration, morphology and Strong’s are transcribed from the Berean interlinear (CC0) + Strong’s lexicons (PD); the literal renderings, divergence notes, word notes and all synthesis are this tool’s own work (⚙) — fallible; verify them.
Named voices, quoted verbatim from public-domain works:
Text: BSB (CC0) with the Berean interlinear and Strong's numbers; parses and lexicon glosses are taken from the brief and not adjusted. Several lexicon entries in the source are truncated mid-phrase (G591 "to give away, i", G1504 "a likeness, i", G2778 "properly, an enrollment ('census'), i"), and the interlinear prints the placeholder "vvv" for the two instances of οὐ in v. 16 and ". . ." where BSB supplies no separate English word; notes here work from the Greek and the parse rather than from those artifacts.
Sources: ten commentators are present. Nine are quoted. JFB is not, because its entry for this whole section is a cross-reference only ("For the exposition, see on Mr 12:13-34") and contains no exposition of Matthew's wording. The Gill entry at v. 16 and the Poole entry at v. 17 are capped in the brief (about 3,378 and 1,288 further characters respectively); neither cap was opened, so quotations from those two entries are drawn from the visible portion only, and any argument they make later in those entries is not represented here.
Uncertain: the identity of the Herodians is genuinely unsettled in the sources and is reported as such, not resolved. Pulpit's transcription of the denarius legend is corrupted in the printed text and is flagged in the voice note; the general description of a laureate Tiberius with a Pontifex Maximus reverse is Pulpit's and Ellicott's, not this synthesis's. The claim that the Greek Old Testament uses εἰκών at Genesis 1:26 comes from outside this brief and is marked as needing verification; the Verifier explicitly found no shared lexeme between Matthew 22:20 and Genesis 1:27, and the image thread is tiered typological on that basis. The Verifier's candidate list for this unit contains only Greek New Testament texts, so every Old Testament contact recorded above (Genesis, Daniel, Proverbs, Jeremiah, Ezra, the Psalms, Deuteronomy, Leviticus, 1 Samuel, 2 Chronicles) is argued from motif or from a commentator's own citation and is tiered structural, typological or flagged accordingly. Coin values given by Gill, Poole, Barnes and Geneva are in their own eighteenth and nineteenth century currencies and are reported, not converted.
✦ = human, public-domain source, quoted and named. ⚙ = machine synthesis, to be verified. Flagged cross-references are left visible on purpose — the verifier working in the open. “Search the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)